1. Public Workshop Meeting #3 December 8, 2010

2. 2 Meeting Agenda Project Update Overview of Tech Memos 3.2 and 6.1 Update on Tech Memos 4.1 and 4.3 Summary of Workshop #2 Concepts Alignments and Streetscapes Work Session to Evaluate and Recommend Concept for Further Review Public Comments Next Steps

3. Project Process WE ARE HERE

4. Technical Memorandum 3.2 Overview Project Purpose and Need Project Goals and Objectives By Key Elements Project Evaluation Criteria By Key Elements

5. Purpose of This Project Address corridor congestion and safety problems Serve future north-south traffic Serve expected population growth in the area Damascus Happy Valley Pleasant Valley Plan area Gresham Serve the growing demand for regional travel

6. Key Project Elements Project Implementation Corridor Alignment Land Use/ Transportation Integration Streetscape Features

7. Corridor Alignment Goals Improve mobility for: Through traffic Local community Freight traffic Minimize impacts to: Environmental resources Cultural resources Social Provide flexibility for: Changing socio-economic conditions Development opportunities

8. Streetscape Cross Section Goals Provide an aesthetically pleasing design. . . That supports the character of the adjoining land uses That preserves rural character Integrate “green streets” design with the natural features Improve safety for all users Support healthy and walkable communities

9. Technical Memorandum 4.1 and 4.3 Update Existing Transportation Conditions Added Six Intersections North of the Study Area Updated Intersection Peak Hour Volumes Conducted Daily Traffic Counts on 172nd and 190th No Significant Operational Changes Future Transportation Conditions (Year 2035) Change in Mitigation Requirement at One Intersection Roundabout/Signal at 172nd/Vogel Financially Constrained Improvements Assumed for Six New Study Intersections Additional Improvements Required at Three New Study Intersections

10. Technical Memorandum 6.1 Overview Relevant Design Standards Clackamas County City of Damascus City of Gresham City of Happy Valley Metro Project Goals and Objectives Context Sensitive Design Approach and Changes for the 172nd Corridor

12. Center turn lane – 12-14 feet

13. Bike lanes – 6 feet on both sides

14. Sidewalks – 6-8 feet

15. Landscape strip – 5-7 feetSource: City of Happy Valley TSP

17. Collectors: 500 Feet

19. Technical Memorandum #6.2 Overview Alignment Concepts 61 Sketches Created Two Solution Types Emerged (System/Transition) 18 Unique Concepts were Developed Cross-Section Concepts 28 Sketches Created Two Solution Types Emerged (Symmetrical/Offset) 2-Lane/3-Lane/4-Lane/5-Lane 18 Unique Concepts were Developed

20. Alignment Concepts (System Plans) 8 System Concepts Utilize New and Existing East-West, North-South Grid System to Connect 172nd and 190th

21. Alignment Concepts (Transitional Plans) 10 Concepts Continuous Southwest to Northeast Connections between 172nd and 190th

22. Cross-Section Concepts (Symmetrical) Same features on both sides of Centerline 11 Concepts

23. Cross-Section Concepts (Offset) Unbalanced Geometric Configurations 7 Concepts (Not Recommended)

24. Evaluation of Alignments (Pros/Cons)

25. Evaluation of Alignments (Scoring)

30. Pros/Cons

31. ScoresPosters for Streetscape Concepts Use “Notes” Section of Your Handout to Provide Feedback Today’s Goal is to narrow the Alignment and Streetscape groups to 5 concepts each and provide recommendations to the PMT

32. Workbook

33. Scorecard

34. Next Steps Process Feedback from PAC, Virtual Workshop #3, and Public Workshop #3 (December 8) PMT to Meet December 16th to narrow the 18 Corridor Alignment and Streetscape Concepts Down to 5 for Further Review Report back to PAC and the public regarding the PMT’s recommendations for concepts to be further reviewed in the next round

35. Thanks!