SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 3
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
[ Focus ]
“Failing the common people”
India has an independent judiciary. Nonetheless, the gaps between
codified law and grassroots reality are wide. The Delhi-based
Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Judicial Reforms wants
matters to change. Prashant Bhushan, one of its leaders, explained
what is wrong with the courts and what could make a difference in a
D+C/E+Z-interview.
[ Interview with Prashant Bhushan ]
In any democracy, the judicial branch of government has to be
sufficiently independent to check and balance the
administrative authorities. On the other hand, every branch of
government must be held accountable. To whom is the judiciary
accountable?
Practically speaking, the judiciary in India is not accountable to anyone.
The only method of holding a judge accountable under the Constitution
is to remove him by way of impeachment. The procedure for initiating
impeachment has been found to be totally impractical, so it really does
not ever happen. To start impeachments proceedings requires the
signatures of 100 members of Lok Sabha, the lower house of
parliemant, or 50 members of the Rajya Sabha, the upper house. Such
numbers are virtually impossible.
Why is that so?
Politicians are unwilling to sign impeachment motions against judges of
the High Court or the Supreme Court, since all of them fear a judicial
backlash against their respective parties. The judiciary has been
resisting any attempt to set up an independent constitutional body
which can investigate complaints against judges. They have been
saying that at best, the judiciary can only be accountable to itself. But
we self-accountability really amounts to non-accountability, because
enforcing rules upon oneself is about enormous conflicts of interest.
In what respects are courts not living up to their official duties?
Those who are in authority are happy with a dysfunctional,
unaccountable and corrupt judiciary. Such a judiciary will not hold
abusing power to account, and it is easy for those in power to strike
deals with corrupt judges. It is the common people of India who need a
functional, accountable and honest judiciary. The courts in India are
inaccessible to the common people of India who cannot afford lawyers.
They have also become very elitist and anti poor. They function with
enormous lethargy and have become largely corrupt.
Indian government bodies have a reputation of corruption. Are
you saying that the courts are no different?
Transparency International found the judiciary in India to be the second
most corrupt institution after the police. A corrupt judiciary will naturally
not be successful in holding other institutions of the state to account.
There are however honourable exceptions and several judges in
various High Courts and some in the Supreme Court have done an
admirable job in holding those in executive authority to account.
What kind of reforms would make the courts perform better?
We need to set up many more courts at the village level. These courts
should allow common people access without the help of lawyers. In
other words, they must not be burdened with strict, but meaningless
procedures. Local courts would help to speed up the disposal of cases,
many of which drag on for years if not decades. We also need
independent, full-time statutory commissions for the appointment and
removal of judges in the Higher Judiciary. And we nee suitably trained
judges who understand the problems of common people.
Many laws are not strictly enforced in India – and many are
http://www.inwent.org/ez/articles/151331/index.en.shtml
inwent.org/ez/…/index_p.en.shtml 1/3
either out-dated or were probably not designed in an
implementable way in the first place. What does that mean for
judicial action?
Many laws are indeed outdated and impractical – and thus not
enforced. But many other laws are not implemented because the rich
and powerful are able to subvert the law enforcement machinery
including the judiciary. In India, judges can find anyone disobeying their
orders guilty of contempt of court, a criminal offence. In theory, that is a
powerful tool of enforcement. But very often judges don’t bother to
enforce their rulings – especially when they would have to be enforced
against the powerful.
Indian courts have a reputation of environmental activism,
thanks to a series of innovative rulings in the 1980s and 1990s.
Yes, but if one examines the recent record of the Supreme Court in its
environmental activism, two trends are immediately clear:
– When environmental protection comes into conflict with socio-
economic rights of the poor and the marginalised, the poor usually get
short shrift and
– when environmental protection comes into conflict with powerful
vested commercial and corporate interests or what is perceived by the
Court to be “development”, environmental protection usually get short
shrift.
India’s labour legislation is strongly in favour of formally
employed staff, but it applies only to a small fraction of the
workforce. Conditions for contract workers in industries or
agriculture are much harsher. What are the implications in
everyday life?
Even the legislation and judgments which support labour in the
organised economy is not being enforced. This has been particularly
so since India embarked upon neoliberal economic policies. There are,
laws to protect contract labour in industries too, but there is no legal
protection for agricultural or domestic labour. This needs to be rectified
by legislation and proper enforcement.
Are the courts class-biased?
There can be little doubt that the Indian courts, generally speaking, are
failing to protect the socio-economic rights of the common people who
constitute the vast majority of the Indian population. Part of the reason
lies in the class structure of the Indian judiciary. The higher judiciary in
India almost invariably comes from the elite section of the society – and
that is hardly different in the USA and other powerful, western nations,
where courts tend to rule in favour of the establishment. The Indian
judiciary, however, has become a self-appointing and self-perpetuating
oligarchy. The Indian judges appoint themselves ever since the
Supreme Court passed a remarkably self-serving judgment by which
the judiciary appropriated the power of appointment from the
government.
There is an inherent tension in the Indian constitution. The
fundamental rights are conservative in the sense of protecting
property and other personal rights of the well-to-do. The
directive principles, on the other hand, outline an agenda of
redistribution and wide-reaching empowerment. To what extent
does that trouble the legal professions?
The Supreme Court’s interpretation of fundamental rights has been
quite progressive in theory, and it has declared that the right to life
includes the right to live with dignity. However, that is not being
enforced. And governments are flouting the directive principles of
equality with impunity in the era of neoliberalism. None of this troubles
the influential sections of the legal profession, which makes enormous
money from the well heeled.
Questions by Hans Dembowski
Prashant Bhushan
is a Supreme-Court lawyer in Delhi and a member of the Working
[Print] [Top] [Imprint] © D+C 2007 - 2009
Committee of the Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Judicial
Reforms.
»» prashantbhush@gmail.com
»» http://www.judicialreforms.org/
Related Articles
»» Read more about India
»» Read more about Law, Judiciary, Public administration
»» Read more about Poverty reduction
»» Read more about Social policy, social development
D+C, 2009/06, Focus, Page 232 - 233

Más contenido relacionado

Was ist angesagt?

''Independence of Indian judiciary and supreme court of India''
''Independence of Indian judiciary and supreme court of India'' ''Independence of Indian judiciary and supreme court of India''
''Independence of Indian judiciary and supreme court of India'' AMANSONI105
 
Judicial Activism
Judicial ActivismJudicial Activism
Judicial Activismshainks023
 
Indian judiciary(Introduction, Problems and Solution)
Indian judiciary(Introduction, Problems and Solution)Indian judiciary(Introduction, Problems and Solution)
Indian judiciary(Introduction, Problems and Solution)RahulKriplani1
 
Hypothesis judicial
Hypothesis judicialHypothesis judicial
Hypothesis judicialBanti Sagar
 
Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”
Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”
Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”Asian Paint Bangladesh Ltd
 
Role of judiciary in defining the nature of the constitution
Role of judiciary in defining the nature of the constitutionRole of judiciary in defining the nature of the constitution
Role of judiciary in defining the nature of the constitutiondasguptatrishita
 
Judicial activism
Judicial activism Judicial activism
Judicial activism Ram Mohan
 
Judicial Activism vis-a-vis Environment in India
Judicial Activism vis-a-vis Environment in IndiaJudicial Activism vis-a-vis Environment in India
Judicial Activism vis-a-vis Environment in IndiaShivani Sharma
 
Administrative Law
Administrative LawAdministrative Law
Administrative Lawcpjcollege
 
Relationship between bar and bench
Relationship between bar and benchRelationship between bar and bench
Relationship between bar and benchKaran Valecha
 
Vajiram and Ravi - Current-affair- Magazine November 2021
Vajiram and Ravi - Current-affair- Magazine November 2021Vajiram and Ravi - Current-affair- Magazine November 2021
Vajiram and Ravi - Current-affair- Magazine November 2021Vajiram Ravi
 
Providing Free Legal Aid
Providing Free Legal AidProviding Free Legal Aid
Providing Free Legal AidLovepreet Kaur
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

''Independence of Indian judiciary and supreme court of India''
''Independence of Indian judiciary and supreme court of India'' ''Independence of Indian judiciary and supreme court of India''
''Independence of Indian judiciary and supreme court of India''
 
Judicial Activism
Judicial ActivismJudicial Activism
Judicial Activism
 
Judicial activism
Judicial activismJudicial activism
Judicial activism
 
Free legal aid
Free legal aidFree legal aid
Free legal aid
 
Indian judiciary(Introduction, Problems and Solution)
Indian judiciary(Introduction, Problems and Solution)Indian judiciary(Introduction, Problems and Solution)
Indian judiciary(Introduction, Problems and Solution)
 
Hypothesis judicial
Hypothesis judicialHypothesis judicial
Hypothesis judicial
 
Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”
Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”
Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”
 
Role of judiciary in defining the nature of the constitution
Role of judiciary in defining the nature of the constitutionRole of judiciary in defining the nature of the constitution
Role of judiciary in defining the nature of the constitution
 
Judicial Reforms in India
Judicial Reforms in IndiaJudicial Reforms in India
Judicial Reforms in India
 
Judicial activism
Judicial activism Judicial activism
Judicial activism
 
Lokpal bill
Lokpal billLokpal bill
Lokpal bill
 
Indian Legal System
Indian Legal SystemIndian Legal System
Indian Legal System
 
Legalliteracy
LegalliteracyLegalliteracy
Legalliteracy
 
Judicial Activism vis-a-vis Environment in India
Judicial Activism vis-a-vis Environment in IndiaJudicial Activism vis-a-vis Environment in India
Judicial Activism vis-a-vis Environment in India
 
Judiciary
JudiciaryJudiciary
Judiciary
 
Administrative Law
Administrative LawAdministrative Law
Administrative Law
 
Relationship between bar and bench
Relationship between bar and benchRelationship between bar and bench
Relationship between bar and bench
 
Vajiram and Ravi - Current-affair- Magazine November 2021
Vajiram and Ravi - Current-affair- Magazine November 2021Vajiram and Ravi - Current-affair- Magazine November 2021
Vajiram and Ravi - Current-affair- Magazine November 2021
 
Providing Free Legal Aid
Providing Free Legal AidProviding Free Legal Aid
Providing Free Legal Aid
 
Judicial activism
Judicial activismJudicial activism
Judicial activism
 

Ähnlich wie 5 bhushan campaign_for_judicial_accountability_in_india_development_and_cooperation_international_journal

Assignment Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”
Assignment Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”Assignment Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”
Assignment Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”Asian Paint Bangladesh Ltd
 
THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docx
THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docxTHE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docx
THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docxSOMOSCO1
 
Basic of Administrative law
 Basic of Administrative law Basic of Administrative law
Basic of Administrative lawKeshav Choudhary
 
Ppt ch 5 the judiciary class 8
Ppt ch 5 the judiciary class 8Ppt ch 5 the judiciary class 8
Ppt ch 5 the judiciary class 8jyotiBisht31
 
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESSMAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESSJamia Millia Islamia
 
CLASS 8 JUDICIARY.pptx
CLASS 8 JUDICIARY.pptxCLASS 8 JUDICIARY.pptx
CLASS 8 JUDICIARY.pptxPavanKumar3775
 
Is the Rule of Law is ensured in our Country or not?
Is the Rule of Law is ensured in our Country or not?Is the Rule of Law is ensured in our Country or not?
Is the Rule of Law is ensured in our Country or not?A K DAS's | Law
 
Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118
Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118
Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118Raviforjustice Raviforjustice
 
Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118
Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118
Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118Raviforjustice Raviforjustice
 
Critical Analysis of Dicey Rule of Law
Critical Analysis of Dicey Rule of LawCritical Analysis of Dicey Rule of Law
Critical Analysis of Dicey Rule of LawManish Kumar
 
Note on self advocacy
Note on self advocacyNote on self advocacy
Note on self advocacyShaun Menon
 

Ähnlich wie 5 bhushan campaign_for_judicial_accountability_in_india_development_and_cooperation_international_journal (20)

Assignment Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”
Assignment Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”Assignment Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”
Assignment Assignment On: “How much Rule of Law is ensure in Bangladesh”
 
Judiciary
JudiciaryJudiciary
Judiciary
 
AVENGERS
AVENGERSAVENGERS
AVENGERS
 
THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docx
THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docxTHE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docx
THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN SOCIETY.docx
 
Booklet for cf ja&r
Booklet for cf ja&rBooklet for cf ja&r
Booklet for cf ja&r
 
Basic of Administrative law
 Basic of Administrative law Basic of Administrative law
Basic of Administrative law
 
Ppt ch 5 the judiciary class 8
Ppt ch 5 the judiciary class 8Ppt ch 5 the judiciary class 8
Ppt ch 5 the judiciary class 8
 
buddingLAWYERS
buddingLAWYERSbuddingLAWYERS
buddingLAWYERS
 
anmolmittal420
anmolmittal420anmolmittal420
anmolmittal420
 
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESSMAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS
 
Introduction to law
Introduction to lawIntroduction to law
Introduction to law
 
CLASS 8 JUDICIARY.pptx
CLASS 8 JUDICIARY.pptxCLASS 8 JUDICIARY.pptx
CLASS 8 JUDICIARY.pptx
 
Is the Rule of Law is ensured in our Country or not?
Is the Rule of Law is ensured in our Country or not?Is the Rule of Law is ensured in our Country or not?
Is the Rule of Law is ensured in our Country or not?
 
Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118
Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118
Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118
 
Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118
Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118
Judges revolt the last nail on the coffin of judicial credibility-190118
 
DMPG
DMPGDMPG
DMPG
 
Critical Analysis of Dicey Rule of Law
Critical Analysis of Dicey Rule of LawCritical Analysis of Dicey Rule of Law
Critical Analysis of Dicey Rule of Law
 
judiciary.pptx
judiciary.pptxjudiciary.pptx
judiciary.pptx
 
Note on self advocacy
Note on self advocacyNote on self advocacy
Note on self advocacy
 
09 chapter 4
09 chapter 409 chapter 4
09 chapter 4
 

Mehr von judicialreform

Against the law_ag_noorani
Against the law_ag_nooraniAgainst the law_ag_noorani
Against the law_ag_nooranijudicialreform
 
Affidavit of mid day vitusha
Affidavit of mid day vitushaAffidavit of mid day vitusha
Affidavit of mid day vitushajudicialreform
 
Affidavit of mid day tayal
Affidavit of mid day tayalAffidavit of mid day tayal
Affidavit of mid day tayaljudicialreform
 
Access to justice by videh upadhyay
Access to justice by videh upadhyayAccess to justice by videh upadhyay
Access to justice by videh upadhyayjudicialreform
 
Above the law_ag_noorani
Above the law_ag_nooraniAbove the law_ag_noorani
Above the law_ag_nooranijudicialreform
 
A curious case on hc judges in apex court
A curious case on hc judges in apex courtA curious case on hc judges in apex court
A curious case on hc judges in apex courtjudicialreform
 
A conflict between law and morality
A conflict between law and moralityA conflict between law and morality
A conflict between law and moralityjudicialreform
 
114 lc on gram nayalaya
114 lc on gram nayalaya114 lc on gram nayalaya
114 lc on gram nayalayajudicialreform
 
15th june invite hindi
15th june invite hindi15th june invite hindi
15th june invite hindijudicialreform
 
12 dna calcutta_high_court_judge_challenges_impeachment_move
12 dna calcutta_high_court_judge_challenges_impeachment_move12 dna calcutta_high_court_judge_challenges_impeachment_move
12 dna calcutta_high_court_judge_challenges_impeachment_movejudicialreform
 
11 hindu no_evidence_to_prosecute_justice_nirmal_yadav
11 hindu no_evidence_to_prosecute_justice_nirmal_yadav11 hindu no_evidence_to_prosecute_justice_nirmal_yadav
11 hindu no_evidence_to_prosecute_justice_nirmal_yadavjudicialreform
 
9 basic structure of the constitution revisited
9  basic structure of the constitution revisited9  basic structure of the constitution revisited
9 basic structure of the constitution revisitedjudicialreform
 
8 the limits of judicial activism infochange
8  the limits of judicial activism infochange8  the limits of judicial activism infochange
8 the limits of judicial activism infochangejudicialreform
 
7 hindu sudershan_reddy_to_head_sen_impeachment_panel
7 hindu sudershan_reddy_to_head_sen_impeachment_panel7 hindu sudershan_reddy_to_head_sen_impeachment_panel
7 hindu sudershan_reddy_to_head_sen_impeachment_paneljudicialreform
 

Mehr von judicialreform (20)

Against the law_ag_noorani
Against the law_ag_nooraniAgainst the law_ag_noorani
Against the law_ag_noorani
 
Affidavit of mid day vitusha
Affidavit of mid day vitushaAffidavit of mid day vitusha
Affidavit of mid day vitusha
 
Affidavit of mid day tayal
Affidavit of mid day tayalAffidavit of mid day tayal
Affidavit of mid day tayal
 
Activists
ActivistsActivists
Activists
 
Activists
ActivistsActivists
Activists
 
Accountability sc epw
Accountability sc epwAccountability sc epw
Accountability sc epw
 
Access to justice by videh upadhyay
Access to justice by videh upadhyayAccess to justice by videh upadhyay
Access to justice by videh upadhyay
 
Above the law_ag_noorani
Above the law_ag_nooraniAbove the law_ag_noorani
Above the law_ag_noorani
 
A supreme embt_ht
A supreme embt_htA supreme embt_ht
A supreme embt_ht
 
A curious case on hc judges in apex court
A curious case on hc judges in apex courtA curious case on hc judges in apex court
A curious case on hc judges in apex court
 
A conflict between law and morality
A conflict between law and moralityA conflict between law and morality
A conflict between law and morality
 
114 lc on gram nayalaya
114 lc on gram nayalaya114 lc on gram nayalaya
114 lc on gram nayalaya
 
30 01 judges
30 01 judges30 01 judges
30 01 judges
 
15th june invite hindi
15th june invite hindi15th june invite hindi
15th june invite hindi
 
Cover page tehelka
Cover page tehelkaCover page tehelka
Cover page tehelka
 
12 dna calcutta_high_court_judge_challenges_impeachment_move
12 dna calcutta_high_court_judge_challenges_impeachment_move12 dna calcutta_high_court_judge_challenges_impeachment_move
12 dna calcutta_high_court_judge_challenges_impeachment_move
 
11 hindu no_evidence_to_prosecute_justice_nirmal_yadav
11 hindu no_evidence_to_prosecute_justice_nirmal_yadav11 hindu no_evidence_to_prosecute_justice_nirmal_yadav
11 hindu no_evidence_to_prosecute_justice_nirmal_yadav
 
9 basic structure of the constitution revisited
9  basic structure of the constitution revisited9  basic structure of the constitution revisited
9 basic structure of the constitution revisited
 
8 the limits of judicial activism infochange
8  the limits of judicial activism infochange8  the limits of judicial activism infochange
8 the limits of judicial activism infochange
 
7 hindu sudershan_reddy_to_head_sen_impeachment_panel
7 hindu sudershan_reddy_to_head_sen_impeachment_panel7 hindu sudershan_reddy_to_head_sen_impeachment_panel
7 hindu sudershan_reddy_to_head_sen_impeachment_panel
 

5 bhushan campaign_for_judicial_accountability_in_india_development_and_cooperation_international_journal

  • 1. [ Focus ] “Failing the common people” India has an independent judiciary. Nonetheless, the gaps between codified law and grassroots reality are wide. The Delhi-based Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Judicial Reforms wants matters to change. Prashant Bhushan, one of its leaders, explained what is wrong with the courts and what could make a difference in a D+C/E+Z-interview. [ Interview with Prashant Bhushan ] In any democracy, the judicial branch of government has to be sufficiently independent to check and balance the administrative authorities. On the other hand, every branch of government must be held accountable. To whom is the judiciary accountable? Practically speaking, the judiciary in India is not accountable to anyone. The only method of holding a judge accountable under the Constitution is to remove him by way of impeachment. The procedure for initiating impeachment has been found to be totally impractical, so it really does not ever happen. To start impeachments proceedings requires the signatures of 100 members of Lok Sabha, the lower house of parliemant, or 50 members of the Rajya Sabha, the upper house. Such numbers are virtually impossible. Why is that so? Politicians are unwilling to sign impeachment motions against judges of the High Court or the Supreme Court, since all of them fear a judicial backlash against their respective parties. The judiciary has been resisting any attempt to set up an independent constitutional body which can investigate complaints against judges. They have been saying that at best, the judiciary can only be accountable to itself. But we self-accountability really amounts to non-accountability, because enforcing rules upon oneself is about enormous conflicts of interest. In what respects are courts not living up to their official duties? Those who are in authority are happy with a dysfunctional, unaccountable and corrupt judiciary. Such a judiciary will not hold abusing power to account, and it is easy for those in power to strike deals with corrupt judges. It is the common people of India who need a functional, accountable and honest judiciary. The courts in India are inaccessible to the common people of India who cannot afford lawyers. They have also become very elitist and anti poor. They function with enormous lethargy and have become largely corrupt. Indian government bodies have a reputation of corruption. Are you saying that the courts are no different? Transparency International found the judiciary in India to be the second most corrupt institution after the police. A corrupt judiciary will naturally not be successful in holding other institutions of the state to account. There are however honourable exceptions and several judges in various High Courts and some in the Supreme Court have done an admirable job in holding those in executive authority to account. What kind of reforms would make the courts perform better? We need to set up many more courts at the village level. These courts should allow common people access without the help of lawyers. In other words, they must not be burdened with strict, but meaningless procedures. Local courts would help to speed up the disposal of cases, many of which drag on for years if not decades. We also need independent, full-time statutory commissions for the appointment and removal of judges in the Higher Judiciary. And we nee suitably trained judges who understand the problems of common people. Many laws are not strictly enforced in India – and many are http://www.inwent.org/ez/articles/151331/index.en.shtml inwent.org/ez/…/index_p.en.shtml 1/3
  • 2. either out-dated or were probably not designed in an implementable way in the first place. What does that mean for judicial action? Many laws are indeed outdated and impractical – and thus not enforced. But many other laws are not implemented because the rich and powerful are able to subvert the law enforcement machinery including the judiciary. In India, judges can find anyone disobeying their orders guilty of contempt of court, a criminal offence. In theory, that is a powerful tool of enforcement. But very often judges don’t bother to enforce their rulings – especially when they would have to be enforced against the powerful. Indian courts have a reputation of environmental activism, thanks to a series of innovative rulings in the 1980s and 1990s. Yes, but if one examines the recent record of the Supreme Court in its environmental activism, two trends are immediately clear: – When environmental protection comes into conflict with socio- economic rights of the poor and the marginalised, the poor usually get short shrift and – when environmental protection comes into conflict with powerful vested commercial and corporate interests or what is perceived by the Court to be “development”, environmental protection usually get short shrift. India’s labour legislation is strongly in favour of formally employed staff, but it applies only to a small fraction of the workforce. Conditions for contract workers in industries or agriculture are much harsher. What are the implications in everyday life? Even the legislation and judgments which support labour in the organised economy is not being enforced. This has been particularly so since India embarked upon neoliberal economic policies. There are, laws to protect contract labour in industries too, but there is no legal protection for agricultural or domestic labour. This needs to be rectified by legislation and proper enforcement. Are the courts class-biased? There can be little doubt that the Indian courts, generally speaking, are failing to protect the socio-economic rights of the common people who constitute the vast majority of the Indian population. Part of the reason lies in the class structure of the Indian judiciary. The higher judiciary in India almost invariably comes from the elite section of the society – and that is hardly different in the USA and other powerful, western nations, where courts tend to rule in favour of the establishment. The Indian judiciary, however, has become a self-appointing and self-perpetuating oligarchy. The Indian judges appoint themselves ever since the Supreme Court passed a remarkably self-serving judgment by which the judiciary appropriated the power of appointment from the government. There is an inherent tension in the Indian constitution. The fundamental rights are conservative in the sense of protecting property and other personal rights of the well-to-do. The directive principles, on the other hand, outline an agenda of redistribution and wide-reaching empowerment. To what extent does that trouble the legal professions? The Supreme Court’s interpretation of fundamental rights has been quite progressive in theory, and it has declared that the right to life includes the right to live with dignity. However, that is not being enforced. And governments are flouting the directive principles of equality with impunity in the era of neoliberalism. None of this troubles the influential sections of the legal profession, which makes enormous money from the well heeled. Questions by Hans Dembowski Prashant Bhushan is a Supreme-Court lawyer in Delhi and a member of the Working
  • 3. [Print] [Top] [Imprint] © D+C 2007 - 2009 Committee of the Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Judicial Reforms. »» prashantbhush@gmail.com »» http://www.judicialreforms.org/ Related Articles »» Read more about India »» Read more about Law, Judiciary, Public administration »» Read more about Poverty reduction »» Read more about Social policy, social development D+C, 2009/06, Focus, Page 232 - 233