Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.

Binaries – Seeing Differences as Relationships

Presentation by Wiebke Loosen & Armin Scholl held at the ECREA Journalism Studies Section Conference, 15 February 2019, Vienna, Austria

  • Loggen Sie sich ein, um Kommentare anzuzeigen.

  • Gehören Sie zu den Ersten, denen das gefällt!

Binaries – Seeing Differences as Relationships

  1. 1. Binaries⏋ Seeing Differences as Relationships Wiebke Loosen & Armin Scholl 15 February 2019 | Vienna| ECREA Journalism Studies Section Conference
  2. 2. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna Wiebke Loosen | January 24, 2019 | Amsterdam
  3. 3. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna Wiebke Loosen | January 24, 2019 | Amsterdam draw a distinction
  4. 4. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna Wiebke Loosen | January 24, 2019 | Amsterdam
  5. 5. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna Wiebke Loosen | January 24, 2019 | Amsterdam journalism
  6. 6. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna Wiebke Loosen | January 24, 2019 | Amsterdam Look at the distinction of “journalism” in the context of its distinction from something else
  7. 7. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna Wiebke Loosen | January 24, 2019 | Amsterdam journalism everything else but journalism
  8. 8. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna Wiebke Loosen | January 24, 2019 | Amsterdam Realize that the excluded “everything but journalism” is as important for the identification of “journalism” as the marking of “journalism” as different from “everything but journalism”.
  9. 9. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna Wiebke Loosen | January 24, 2019 | Amsterdam journalism everything else but journalism (Baecker, https://catjects.wordpress.com/2013/04/02/george-spencer-brown-wird-90/)
  10. 10. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna „Draw a distinction and a universe comes into being“ 10
  11. 11. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna Breaking Binaries? 11 • Do binaries hinder us from coping with the (increasing?) complexity of journalism? • Is it really the case that binaries obscure to observe certain transformations, occurrences etc. – or do they rather allow to do so? → Questioning the proposition that we must break binaries in order to be able explore the diverse meanings of journalism
  12. 12. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna Clarifying Binaries 12 • Arguing for a) making distinctions, b) considering both sides of the distinction, c) understanding differences as relationships, and d) asking who makes a distinction (second-order observation) • Such a clarification is not only a cognitive and philosophical exercise but also of normative and practical interest
  13. 13. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna Rehabilitating binaries 13 • The criticism of binaries, dichotomies and boundaries neglects their - epistemological status, - pragmatic meaning, and - strategic use. • Complexity « Binaries • Without binaries no observation of blurring boundaries
  14. 14. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna Epistemological and normative value of binaries within journalism (research) 14 Binaries are 1) dynamic rather than stable, 2) pragmatic relationships rather than given ontologies, and 3) serve a strategic purpose of legitimation, which has emerged as boundary work (cf. Carlson 2016).
  15. 15. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna Exemplary Applications 15 • Typical diagnosis: continuous evolution towards blurring boundaries and breaking binaries • Soft news/hard news • Fact/fiction • Public/private Ø Empirical observation: distinctions are rather re-arranged, re-sorted, or re-grouped
  16. 16. ► Loosen & Scholl | 15 February 2019 | Vienna Conclusion 16 • Dichotomies, binaries and boundaries should not be ruled out as unreliable or invalid logical tools. • Instead: Using them as process-related and observer-related categories rather than ontological realities. • Binaries are more stable than we might expect and re-emerge in different guises • The blurring of boundaries (re-)stimulates negotiations of demarcations lines

×