Argumentative Essay On Welfare

The Influence Of Drugs On Welfare
A)The first thought I had when I heard the topic of whether or not welfare recipients should be
drug trusted was that it would be interesting. My second opinion was that no we should not drug
test welfare recipients. I understand that some people are on welfare do drugs, but it's a really low
number. I do accept my first opinion that came into my head.
B)The reasons for my opinions is that we shouldn't drug them, it's not fair to hold everyone
accountable for those that do abuse the system. A lot of them do work, it's a misconception that
they don't because they are lazy or because they do drugs. I feel this way because I've known
people who have been on welfare. They've never abused it, they actually used it for what the
purpose was for.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Should Welfare Recipients be Tested for Drugs? Welfare was created in 1935 by Franklin D.
Roosevelt. It is the closest technique or practice of our country to socialism. It helped families
during the Great Depression, but has been abused thoroughly within our country. Many citizens
would like to do away with the system, but many resist this because it is their only income. Lots of
skeptical citizens see it as the root of much of our country's debt, but there is no easy way for it to
be eliminated. Many steps have been taken to reduce the abusement and eventually do away with the
system. This includes drug testing for welfare recipients. There are multiple issues with this idea and
lots of people would like keep the system. Taxpayers that dislike what the government has come to,
fear that...show more content...
We are weaker in all aspects, and are continuing down that path. The beginning of the path was from
socialists growing popularity in our country. Welfare is one of the roots of this growing issue. Our
country is digging themselves a grave by creating laws that go against what our country was founded
on. Although many argue that the constitution gives citizens privacy to avoid drug tests, it never
mentioned welfare. The founding fathers produced a strong country in the beginning, and would
be appalled with our country today. The country they made was strong and free, and that must be
restored. The first step in this action would be to get rid of the unneeded and abused system of
welfare. Since our country would go into another depression we can't do this at once. We must
take it piece by piece and begin by cutting down the abuse of the system. This could be the first
step in getting our country back. Welfare recipients should be drug tested because American taxes
should be used legally, the tests will give an incentive to get off drugs, welfare should be used for
those in need not those who need drugs, and helps reduce the national

Child Welfare Essay
Ethics and Social Justice | HUM220 A02
Module 5, Assignment 1: Analyzing a Social Policy
6/2013
In the past, more importantly today, many social policies have been created by humans, and can
therefore also be destroyed by them as well. Social policies were designed to resolve issues that are
"considered important by a mass of voters, media, and political actors" (Argosy, 2013). Social
policy are only the start of help for some, yet they aren't always effective, rational, or socially just
(Argosy, 2013).
An important social problem at hand is child welfare. "The protection of children from harm by
their families and the provision of safe havens for children who are maltreated in their home...show
more content...
Theories behind the actually cause of child abuse, neglect, and/or maltreatment vary from person to
person. It is stated from one source, that child abuse is due to factors such as psychological
problems, mental illness, family issues, and financial struggles. A person who is "not in their right
mind," or better stated– 'mentally ill' and suffering psychological problems, could harm a child, and
it is not always intentional. Those who are under the influence of drugs or stressed could easily
harm their children. Also, "financial problems could invoke parents or other members of the family
to abuse children as an outlet of their emotions" (Gibson, 2008). I cannot begin, as an individual who
suffered abuse (not by my parents), to choose just one important reason of child abuse, because the
cause itself is multifaceted– a result of multiple factors at play. There are socio–economic causes of
child abuse: family income levels, different cultural values, and institutionalized manifestations of
child abuse. There are family environments & parental profiles that take part in the causes of child
abuse: Child rearing practices, single parenting, past involvement in abuse, and domestic violence;
ages & maturity of the parents, and more (Zentactics, 2008). Each cause varies on the attitude, and
disposistion of the parent, caregiver, or guardian, at a

Speech On Animal Cruelty
Animal Cruelty
Something that I haven't consider is how the way they kill the animals to get the meat. And how
they are treated. They should at least not kill them like that. It horrible the way they do. They are
not thinking what pain and suffer the animals go through when they are killing them savagely. And
how they treat them is no way any human should be treating an animal. They should really consider
other ways of doing it but not in a savagely way.
When chickens are put in cages they are all being stuffed together and they can even stretch out
their wings or even some of them don't even get to see the sun of light or even smell fresh air from
outside because they are all in cages. When they get them out, some farmers throw them around until
they are dead. They will bash their heads with their cages. Or some of the farmers will slice their
throat. When they kill a baby chicken, they don't even let them grow. Ones they are hatch they get
killed. Some of the farmers throw the chickens all together in a bag so they could suffocate or they
will throw them into a machine so they could be killed. It's horrible because they take them away
from their mother when they hatch. When the cows are killed it is horrible they put them a machine
that spins them around and then they slice their throat. They're still alive when they throw them and
live them to die. You could hear themsuffering. They don't even bother cleaning up after them they
just leave them all together. Some

Welfare Reform Argumentative Essay
The intentions of welfare reform is simply to reduce dependency, reduce child poverty, and to
strengthen marriages (in line citation website). However, taking away a low income families
chance for help is not going to help their poverty. The idea of getting rid of the help a family
needs, in order to help the family end their poverty is contradictory. This is more likely to leave
families stuck in poverty, or even send them below if their aid gets removed.
Welfare reform sparked a great deal of interest in the 1990's when President Clinton called together
a speech calling for dramatic changes to the welfare policy. In his speech he stated "No one who
works full–time and has children at home should be poor anymore. No one who can work should
...show more content...
Did you know that around 15 million Americans, and single mother and their children are on
welfare? Sometimes working 20 hours is not a possibility for a full time single parent, due to the
expenses of babysitters, and schooling. These parents have only one option, which is to apply for
welfare to get the assistance required to cover those expenditures so they will be able to work the
20 hours mandatory. Other single parents cannot find a job or have a challenging time keeping them
due to mild disabilities and mental health issues( in line citation interview), which are out of their
control. This causes worthy families to lose their rights to their children. When that happens
numerous children will be taken away from their homes and placed into child protection services.
Which could lead to countless future difficulties within the child's life, when in fact this contradicts
the intentions of the welfare reform act. Even though this problem can be completely avoided if
benefits were not cut or denied. Although, the main idea of the welfare reform act is to insure the
well–being of young children, the loss of benefits could leave many children poverty stricken.
Which, ironically is what Clinton and others involved were trying to

Persuasive Essay On Welfare
Did you know that right around 35% of Americans are receiving some form of government
assistance? Growing up, 1 out of 3 of friends were given food stamps or housing assistance. Welfare
is given to a person if unable to support themselves or their families. Unfortunately, the problem with
many people having this assistance is people abusing the process. Requirements are set for welfare
to be helpful and successful for families. One issue that is happening is not having people working
or saving up while receiving money or food stamps. The point of welfare is to have programs to help
citizen's get out of the hole to be able to live on their own. Drugs and alcohol have had an impact
who gets accepted and who gets denied. Laws need to be placed so not everyone can have
assistance if using drugs. Receiving assistance comes with mental and health issues that need to be
brought to attention and taken care of. To never have gone through what some people have, it is
difficult for the author to relate to. It is tough for people to understand why people do the things
they do and why those people receive welfare. If welfare did not exist, an outrageous amount of
people would be left on the street with nothing and no one to help them get through what they are
going through. The author has family members that get assistance from the government and to see
the family not have that assistance anymore would be heartbreaking and stressful. Overall, there are
problems with welfare that need to

Argumentative Essay On Drug Testing
The decision whether a person who is on welfare should be drug tested or not is a continuing
controversy. When I chose this topic, before any information was researched, I agreed that welfare
recipients should be drug tested. As I was researching information to back up my claim, I discovered
that there was more accurate evidence that backed up the counter argument. This convinced me to
agree with my counter argument. Although some people believe it is a good idea to test a welfare
recipient for drug use, it actually can do more harm than good.
Drug test is a test created in order to determine if one uses or has been using any form of a
non–prescribed drugs. The test can be verified in various ways. Drug testing is a common
requirement held for one who is seeking future employment with a specific company. The test is
also used for various businesses, private groups, and organizations. Using illegal drugs can have
many bad consequences and cannot just cause serious trouble for the person using them but for
the company as well. One factor that shows how it can be pointless of having to drug test one
who is on welfare is because how much it costs. Issuing out drug test to people on welfare can be
an expensive thing especially if the person who is drug tested test ends up coming back negative.
When that happens one can say that the testing is a waste of both time and especially money. For
years most people believed that being able to drug test people who need financial

Argumentative Essay: The Animal Welfare Act
Seventy percent of the human population in America are on at least one prescription drug. That
means that thirty percent is either lucky enough to not need one or make the choice to not take them.
Animals, on the other hand, have never and will never be given the choice, Tramadol or
Hydrocodone, for the pain that humans inflict. Although animal testing contributes to life saving
cures, innocent animals are tested and harmed inhumanely because organizations don't follow
Animal Welfare Act rules. Animals are not the same as humans, therefore the same result cannot be
attained. There are other alternative testing methods that now exist and can replace the need for
animals. It is humanity's duty to provide a voice for these innocent animals. Dating...show more
content...
The Animal Welfare Act takes a huge part in the testing. The act was passed in 1996 to establish
regulations in zoos, aquariums, puppy mills, animal dealers, circuses, and research facilities. In order
to abide by the regulation, minimum care must be provided, included housing, handling, sanitation,
nutrition, veterinary care and extreme weather conditions. Despite the name "Animal" Welfare Act,
it does not cover all animals. "Exact numbers aren't available because mice, rats, birds, and cold
blooded animals– who make up more than 99 percent of animals used in experiments– are not
covered by even the minimal protections of the Animal Welfare Act and therefore go uncounted."
("Animal Testing 101"). Equally Important, animal are also very different from humans. They may
be biologically similar but their brains do not work like ours. "A neurologically complex disease like
schizophrenia is hard to model in an animal in the first place– you can't ask a mouse questions, after
all–– so testing if a drug reduces symptoms is even more difficult." ("About Animal Testing".)
Obviously the negatives, AWA and differences biologically conquer the

Persuasive Essay On Child Welfare
Misery, abandonment, and no love, how can one let a child grow up with thoughts so negative
running through their minds? Children are removed from their homes, forced to live in strangers
houses, and expected to behave like they live in a stable living environment. All this is occurring so
fast, that they can't process their situation and feel like they don't have anyone in the world that
loves them. Although our nation claims to be doing the best they can with child welfare, the entire
program has focused their efforts on removing children from their homes instead of focusing on the
child's emotional needs. Mr. President, we need to fix this issue now because children are the future.
When a family is torn apart because allegations of abuse, neglect, or financial issues, placing a child
in foster care, rather than trying to fix the problem, can only further damage a child's well being.
Society understands our current system is awful, but no one is protesting for a reform, or they're
aren't trying hard enough. Child safety is the number one objective of the system, but it's not
working like it should. "In 2015, over 670,000 children spent time in U.S. foster care" (Foster
Care). Of those 670,000 cases, more than half could be eliminated with a reform in the system. The
focus should be on keeping families together, rather than taking them apart. Child welfare has a
mission, to have "continuous improvement of child protective systems address services to be
provided, social

Essay On Welfare Drug Testing
The Possibility and Effects of Drug Testing Welfare Recipients
One of the many goals of the American Welfare System is to provide financial assistance to U.S
citizens who are unable to support themselves. Government funds are provided in hopes that many
of these able bodied citizens will eventually find a way to become financially independent and
economically productive. However, there is a percentage of welfare recipients that use their
government funding to purchase and abuse illicit drugs. When welfare is abused in this manner, the
system loses credibility and the long–term goals of seeing financially self–sufficient citizens, and
economic progress on both micro and macro levels, are not only compromised, they are regressed by
the negative impacts of illegal drug use. The most common (and commonly debated) method of
weeding out citizens who choose to abuse the welfare system is enforcing mandatory drug testing on
all welfare recipients. This method is an ongoing controversy involving elements of legality,
economics, budget analysis, a violation of rights, the allocation of government funds, and
discriminatory stereotypes of welfare recipients. Regardless of the diverse array of fundamental
complexities involved with executing or rejecting this preventative procedure, most Americans'
opinions are simply based...show more content...
Their studies show various results, and their opinions are manipulated by their ideology and how
they believe these policies could potentially affect the future, which cannot be verified by data
because they are applying their statistics to a hypothetical situation. Many of their qualitative
statistics, data, and firsthand knowledge has led them to assume what the widespread implications
of drug testing welfare recipients will lead to, but they do not appear to possess a solid equation that
will predict the outcome of the

Argument Essay: Drug Testing for Welfare
The Push for Drug Testing of Welfare Recipients
United States lawmakers face one of the most pressing issues of our time–welfare reform. New
screening processes, often considered a direct violation of constitutional rights, have already been
enacted in many states. Strong evidence exists, asserting that the practice of administering drug
testing to welfare recipients will cost the U.S. taxpayers more money in the long run, stigmatize
applicants and participants, and serve only the purpose of making the pharmaceutical companies
more powerful. In order to protect the constitutional rights of potential welfare recipients, United
States lawmakers should avoid further criminalizing the poor by submitting them to drug testing and
/or a...show more content...
Her personal information has been entered into the welfare system's database, which may be
accessed by law enforcement officers without any basis for suspicion [...]. All of this has occurred
before she has received a single welfare check (645).
There is no doubt that those Americans in need of assistance have been subjected to unconstitutional
treatment by the welfare program. As a result of the criminal actions of a few, all of the needy are
being unfairly scrutinized. The implementation of unfounded drug testing in addition to the already
criminalizing application process will only serve to further stigmatize the needy–and all in the name
of the mighty dollar. Some believe that it is not the quest to save money that is the driving force
behind the push for this legislation. Rather, it is a desire to make millions for the pharmaceutical
companies that lawmakers are seeking to achieve.
Lobbyist interference from multi–million dollar pharmaceutical companies has heavily influenced
Washington lawmakers' policymaking. These pharmaceutical companies have their hand in much of
the United States lawmaking practice. These powerful corporations stand to make a lot of money
from the sale of drug testing supplies and services to the U.S. government. Macdonald reports:
[...] several Republican lawmakers in Congress have pushed hard for the mandatory drug testing of
anyone, anywhere, applying for welfare. Leading the charge in the senate is Orrin Hatch [...]

For a long time now, since the accomplished formation of a stable government, the U.S government
has had programs and passed laws that either dealt with issues of or influence family. Many of
these "family" programs and laws currently in place today are frequently and commonly debated.
One of the most debated and most labored over "family" programs or law is Welfare. The argument
is whether or not to, and how welfare should be cut or minimized.
The debate is simple enough, but the argument on welfare's benefits and drawbacks is not. On the pro
side of the argument, on which I stand, welfare aids poor families as well as the economy and may
help to reduce crime.
Welfare's benefits far out weigh its drawbacks. Welfare...show more content...
The purpose of welfare is to aid a person with monetary need in getting by until they can find a job
to support themselves, but this seldom occurs. Some argue that there are plenty of poor families
that get along without welfare and its benefits. These people argue that the heads of these families
have multiple jobs and work extremely hard to get by, while others just sit and collect a welfare
check from the government. I feel that this is unfair to the hard workers, and unfair to us tax payers.
Others say that these people are in their present situation because of their own ill choices in life and
that the government owes them nothing. It is also true that there exist a great number of people that
abuse the welfare program. These individuals may enroll in welfare without the intention of ever
getting a job. Others trade foodstamps for cash or drugs.
These ideas, or facts, can be used as a valid argument for the dismantling, or at least minimizing, of
the welfare program.
Currently steps are being taken by the government to reduce the number of welfare recipients as
well as to minimize spending on the program itself. The president recently introduced his
"Workfare" plan. This plan, by forcing individuals to both work and search for work and by
ultimately truncating their welfare benefits, should reduce both the number of people

Persuasive Essay On Social Welfare Policy
Social welfare policy is "defined as acts, laws, and rules that help improve the lives of people in
the community" . Social welfare policy includes social security, justice, unemployment insurance,
living conditions, health care, child protection, and educational policy. During the English Poor
Laws, it provided relief for the poor as well as work for the able bodied in workhouses. The primary
goal for social welfare policies is to reduce poverty. President Ronald Reagan proposed the "Trickle
Down" method which was a theory that provided economic benefits to those with upper–level
incomes. In the past, these social welfare programs was not enough to dismiss the issues of
inflation and equality within the economic system. Social Welfare policies have developed over
the years but there is still a ongoing issue on poverty. According to the Census on poverty, "In
2016 there were 40.6 million people in poverty, 2.5 million fewer than in 2015 and 6.0 million
fewer than in 2014" (Semega and Kollar 2017). Welfare assistance may result in families being
trapped in poverty. Some may argue that one of the reasons why there is poverty in America now
is due to social welfare programs that give a minimal amount of money to aid the poor. According
to Eternity, "facts and figures on the subject of poverty must be parsed: There are "beggars" living
paycheck–to–paycheck, a step away from slipping into poverty. There are "beggars" mired in deep
poverty, handed down generationally. And there

Welfare Is A Good Idea
Welfare is a good idea that financially helps those in need and provides people with an income
when they are unable to earn a monthly wage; however, when this system is abused it is no
longer efficient. Welfare was intended for people who are permanently disabled mentally or
physically and are unable to work, but welfare has become an option for every American, even
those who do not want to work but are capable of doing so. The American Economy has started to
decline because of this due to many people realizing they can get more money with less effort. This
problem has only grown worse over time since its creation. Even the hardworking American doesn't
make as much as a welfare recipient since the system of welfare pays more...show more content...
Over time the feeling of embarrassment has begun to fade away and more people have begun
receiving welfare without feeling remorse. According to a recent study, the government spends
$131.9 billion dollars Moore 2 annually on welfare which, if certain recipients stopped receiving
money, could be drastically decreased. Many welfare recipients have children; some recipients
have more children to get more money. These children are majorly affected by seeing their
parents get money. Most children do not understand how the system works and think the "nice"
government is giving their parents money for doing nothing. This would have many
physiological effects on the children who witnesses this and destroys their drive to do anything
for themselves. This has been seen in many European welfare states; welfare is recognized to
contribute to social depression and destroy parts of society as a hole (Forde, Ian, Ruth Bell, and
Michael G. Marmot 1). As the children grow up, they may not learn how the system works and
believe that they can do the same thing their parents have done and get welfare money as well. If
too many children witness this, overtime the economy will steadily lose workers, causing those
who do work to work harder and cause many American factories to move overseas away from the
people who actually need the jobs. This will cause America to go into the next Great Depression and
possibly not recover. A shocking

Arguments Against Welfare Drug Testing
Chase Sulewski 4
Argumentative Essay
Welfare drug test
Welfare is for people who don't have enough income to live off of and is supposed to be for helping
them out with things like food, clothing, and most basic necessities. 61% of people not on welfare
are against it and believe people who receive welfare don't use it for the intended reason and
basically look at it as free money. There is 21.3% of the population on government assist. That's
approximately 52.2 million peaple participating in it right now. They get food stamps from the govt
and sell them to buy drugs or alcohol which is probably the reason they are on it in the first place. If
they did a drug test beforehand, then they would know to not accept that person because the money
more than likely would only buy them their next high; therefore, welfare recipients should receive
drug tests before being accepted....show more content...
Plus, most people when looking for a job will have to pass a drug test in order to get the job.
Welfare should be the same if not more strict because tax money is what pays for welfare. If we
keep giving money to them and there are no drug test waiting for them down the road then they
are just gonna keep doing what they did before to get in the situation and it will be easier because
they are getting it for basically nothing. Testing them would ensure the taxpayers money isnt being
wasted on someones drugs and that is actually helping someone the way it was intended. Some
Senior citizens are even on welfare which is kind of suprising but it's a a small percentage being
13% over 65 years

Argumentative Essay On Animal Welfare
Health, benefit, well–being, progress, care, profit, thriving, all words that are synonyms to welfare.
Animal welfare has been an agricultural issue for several decades. Animal welfare refers to the
physical, emotional, and mental state an animal is in. There are several organization in the United
States along with other corporations around the world that have the same mission; to promote animal
welfare. This issue has a deep–rooted history, various legislative acts being voted on and passed, as
well as many effects from these organizations, and legislative bills. Animal farms find their first
start in 7500 BC where goats and sheep were farmed for their resources such as wool, milk, and
meat (Early Farming). Even 7,000 years before Jesus...show more content...
When these laws are passed, producers are burdened with rules and regulations that they must
follow. For example, it could be involving the slaughter, transportation, or shelter the livestock is
housed in. The law could require a certain amount of square footage or acreage per a selected
number of livestock. Next the middleman is affected. The middleman could be anyone from a
grocery store owner to an owner of a store that sells things that use animal products. Usually the
laws require farmers to use a more expensive route to caring for an animal thus the farmer has to
raise his or her prices when selling the animal or product. The grocery store owner then would
have to pay more for the animal products he is purchasing, but he would also be able to advertise
depending on the product that his products were organic, antibiotic free, or free of animal testing.
This could both benefit or drawback his business depending on the consumers in the area. The
consumer is the final group to be affected by animal welfare acts. There are both positive and
negatives to the consumer side. The positives to the consumer side is that they can take advantage of
antibiotic free, organic, animal testing free and other specialized products. If consumers are
conscious of what they are putting in and on their bodies they would appreciate the choices these
laws allow them. The

Persuasive Essay On Child Welfare
Laws in most states mandate that reasonable efforts be provide to families who become involved
with child welfare agencies. Social workers, on behalf of the agency toil to provide reasonable
efforts to families. Presumptively, reasonable efforts are provided for families to mitigate the issues
that brought them to the attention of child protection agency.
Child welfare systems are designed to ensure the safety and well–being of children and families. The
mission of this system is a noble one and can be very rewarding and beneficial for all involved.
Ironically, that same system that is designed to help families in times of crisis can be, harsh and
challenging to families and social workers.
It is a reasonable argument that child welfare service entities are necessary as it is all too frequent
that child abuse/neglect cases are heard all over the nation and is ultimately a world health issues.
Increasing social issues such as unstable families, poverty, crime, poor education, lack of access to
health care and mental health services are some of the factors that contribute to this continuous
epidemic that affects many people from various socio–economic classes. Many nations have taken
steps to enhance and improve efforts in the fight against the mistreatment of children.
Awareness and recognition of child maltreatment issues has had a positive impact upon many
families who have benefited from the interventions being offered. In the United States, billions of
dollars are

Summary Of The Welfare Approach
In this article the welfare approach discussed in Sandel's Justice is used. The welfare approach
recognizes that maximizing welfare, improving the standard of living, and aiding economic
growth promote prosperity. The article "White House to Announce Steps to Ease Access to
Student Aid" informs us that the President will announce a plan that makes financial aid for
students easier to access. Making financial aid more accessible to the public can promote many
benefits. One of those benefits is a higher number of students enrolling in college because more
students will be able to afford it. When more of our citizens go to college the welfare of our country
and the standard of living improves. Those students will go on to graduate with degrees

Animal welfare versus animal rights is very controversial, but yet interesting subject. There is a huge
debate between Animal Rights activists and Animal Welfare activists. Animal Welfare refers to the
state of the animal; the treatment that an animal receives is covered by other terms such as animal
care,animal husbandry, and humane treatment. Animal Welfare activists believe that animals should
be treated humanely and fairly, but do not have the same rights as humans. Animal Rights is a belief
that animals have the right to live free from use in medical research, hunting, and other services to
humans. Animal Rights activists do not distinguish between human and animals. They believe that
there is no rational difference between an animal's...show more content...
One of these practices Animal Rights activists advocate against is factory farming. Factory farming
is a system of rearing livestock using intensive methods, by which poultry, pigs, or cattle are
confined indoors under strictly controlled conditions. Factory farming is necessary due to the high
demand to feed our growing population. Most of these factory farms have intensive operations. An
intensive livestock operation refers to a farm or farm operation engaged in raising, breeding, or
feeding beef or dairy cattle, horses, swine, sheep, goats, poultry/fowl, turkeys/ducks, or other
livestock in concentrations of 300 or more animal units. Another practice used in factory farming is
confinement systems. Confinement system is any system of raising poultry or other livestock in
which the animals are kept from contact with the ground primarily as a sanitary measure. Using this
system helps keep our food from being contaminated and making the general public sick. At these
farms, livestock animals are confined into small pens with hundreds of other animals. Confining
these animals in such small space can lead to the spread of disease. To combat this spread, farmers
put loads of antibiotics in the animal's feed. Another problem with having such a large amount of
animals confined into a singular space is fighting. When the animals get into fights,

Argument for Welfare in the United States Essay
Can a single mother of three working full time for minimum wage afford to pay ' by herself ' for
food, clothing, transportation, childcare, occupational training and medical care? Without
government aid, the obvious answer is no. Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF), as described
by Robert Kuttner, is a government aid program designed 'to help all of the working poor rise out of
poverty.' It includes tuition reimbursements, wage supplements, and above all, childcare? (Kuttner).
It creates a more equal opportunity for those at a disadvantage to improve themselves and their
situation. TANF, 'which limits the time families can remain onwelfare, appears to be a smashing
success' (Cohn). First, if eligibility were to become stricter, seeking...show more content...
(Dr. Adams). Citing the aforementioned requirements, it is obvious that making eligibility stricter
would not help, but, for three specific reasons, would instead hurt the nation?s welfare system.
First, if the government were to make welfare eligibility stricter it would impede on the attempts
of those below the poverty line trying to find a job. TANF ?can free up additional dollars for
work related expenses and other basic needs and thus aid families? efforts to move from welfare to
work? (Sard and Daskal). It is needed to help pay for those ?necessities that often accompany
employment, such as additional clothing and food costs, child care, and transportation to and from
work? (Sard and Daskal). The program does not just hand out money, but provides the aid needed to
?achieve self–sufficiency? through employment (Cohn). Without the additional money for clothing,
food costs, child care, and transportation, an individual would not be able to maintain employment
and abide by the TANF requirements. It is evident that TANF is necessary for those individuals that
live in poverty and are seeking employment. If the requirements were to become stricter, the number
of the employed and those living below the poverty line would increase simultaneously.
Second, those in need cannot become productive members of society if an education or occupational
training is not in

Argumentative Essay On Welfare

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Paper Writing Service College

More from Paper Writing Service College (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Argumentative Essay On Welfare