Anzeige
Textile Rigging Multihulls Mag Mar 2010
Textile Rigging Multihulls Mag Mar 2010
Nächste SlideShare
Rubber Hump  BrochureRubber Hump Brochure
Wird geladen in ... 3
1 von 2
Anzeige

Más contenido relacionado

Anzeige

Textile Rigging Multihulls Mag Mar 2010

  1. #05 36 PRACTICAL ADVICE FROM THE EDITORIAL TEAM Text and photos : Gilles Ruffet Textile standing rigging Textile rigging has us fantasising... It’s attractive, light and has a ‘racing’ look. But it is also practical and useful aboard our catamarans... TEXTILE STANDING RIGGING HAS US FANTASISING: IT’S EXPENSIVE, CERTAIN PEOPLE SAY. NOT AS STRONG AS STAINLESS, SAY OTHERS, OR NOT JUSTIFIABLE. IT IS CERTAINLY LESS VISIBLE THAN A CARBON MAST (THEREFORE NOT SO GOOD FOR THE OWNER’S EGO). IN THE CHOICE OF A RIG, VARIOUS ELEMENTS HAVE TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT: THE PRICE, OF COURSE, ELONGATION, INEVITABLY, AND BREAKING STRENGTH, QUITE OBVIOUSLY. TODAY WE ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT KEVLAR, PBO, AND THE ONE THAT RISKS MAKING ALL THE OTHERS OBSOLETE: DYNEX DUX®. KEVLAR®: GOOD aloft. But it is also twice the FOR CRUISING price. The other problem with RUNNING RIGGING: THREE CHEERS FOR SK 90. Kevlar® is an aramid fibre, a Kevlar comes from its predispo- polymer whose real name is sition to creep. To decrease Launched at the last Mets in poly paraphenylene terephtha- this phenomenon, a tip is to Amsterdam, by the ropemaker lamide (culture is like jam, the use a larger diameter; varia- Lancelin, and Blew Stoub, SK 90 less you have, the more you tions in length will then be finds its field of application mainly spread it out...). It is the trade negligible. Kevlar rigging in the running rigging. Compared name registered by its inven- seems to be quite well-suited with SK75 and SK78, SK90 to cruising use. Like all synthe- Dyneema® offers a large increase in tor, Du Pont de Nemours. The tic fibres, it is sensitive to strength (much greater breaking problem with Kevlar lies in the chafe. It is therefore essential strength) as well as in increase difficulty of making splices, to protect the parts concerned; in elasticity module (lower thus the ends are associated for example, where the genna- elongation). This fibre can therefore with bi-cone type terminals. On be used for jib, gennaker or main a 50-foot cruising cat, Kevlar ker sheet rubs, etc... One tech- nique consists of replacing the sheets, or for running backstay allows substantial weight purchases. For the standing rigging, saving, compared with the use lower part of a shroud with a stainless cable. A reinforced it can be used to make strops. of stainless steel, and this where it is most needed, i.e. sheath will also do the job, but A Colligo Marine lashing: attractive and strong!
  2. As strong as a cable... 37 guaranteed to last for more other fibres, these terminals Dux® doesn’t absorb water than three years... The main can therefore only be made up (compared to Vectran), and advantage of PBO comes from in the factory...or by an expe- last but not least, it is no more its lack of creep (less than rienced rigger. expensive to fit to a multihull 0.2%) - less than single strand! Advantages: light. than stainless steel rigging. PBO rigging allows 70% Disadvantages: its price… As for the terminals: the weight saving aloft. PBO Use: standing rigging for racing process is not too technical, cannot be terminated by a boats. and an experienced amateur splice, or even knotted, so the should be able to carry it out. DYNEX DUX®: ends present some difficulties. Otherwise, you can call on a A FIFTH OF THE WEIGHT OF Navtec offers bi-conic type professional rigger: Blew Stoub STAINLESS STEEL, A THIRD terminals which are quite in Lorient, Tripp Line Rigging replacing it when it is worn to OF THE PRICE OF PBO! similar to those used with its limit will perhaps be quite Kevlar®. They are cheaper Dynex Dux® is nothing other complicated. Kevlar is very sen- than those offered by the than Dyneema® which has sitive to UV, and must be pro- British company, Future Fibres undergone a treatment to tected in an ad hoc way. (represented in France by Blew make it even stronger. Here Advantages: light, not too Stoub, in Lorient), which pass then is a new fibre which is expensive. the continuous fibre back and light, very strong, doesn’t Disadvantages: difficult splicing forth through two thimbles, the creep and is not very expen- etc, creep, sensitive to chafe ends; the whole assembly is sive. The strength and creep of and UV. then enclosed in a heat-shrunk PBO, for the price of stainless Use: cruising or racing. polyurethane sheath. This pro- steel! cess is more expensive than The main disadvantage of PBO: EXPENSIVE AND NOT that offered by Navtec, but it is Dynex® is its creep. A new VERY LONG-LASTING also lighter. Navtec also offers arrival on the exotic fibre This is polyphenilene – 2.6 terminals in titanium, but the market, Dynex Dux® is, accor- bezobisoxazole (culture...), in cost then becomes similar to ding to Colligo Marine, the A Vectran lacing to tighten a the form of microscopic that of Future Fibres. Unlike the “first 12-strand rope which PBO lower shroud. filaments. It is produced by just offers similar characteristics to one manufacturer, the 1 x 19 stainless steel cable.” Olivier Cusin in La Rochelle, Japanese company, Toyobo. What exactly are these charac- etc. Dynex Dux’s only slight PBO appeared at the begin- teristics? On paper, it has lots shortcoming comes perhaps ning of the 2000s, and was at of advantages. Firstly, its from the fact that it is a bit stiff first used mainly on big racing strength, as it is advertised as to begin with, and it takes boats, for technical manufactu- being 15 to 45% stronger, a few days sailing for it to ring reasons (difficulties in pro- according to its diameter, than become softer. ducing small fibres). PBO rigs Dynex® . Next, it doesn’t Note however, that there is not are expensive. If you have the creep. In fact, on a Dynex rig, yet any long-term experience means... However, just like creep can be as much as 2 to with this miracle product... Vectran, its resistance to UV is 3%, which means that lashings Advantages: Light, does not poor, and it is therefore essen- have to be tightened regularly. creep. tial to protect it with a sheath. Here it is considered to be Disadvantages: Rough to begin PBO remains delicate and has negligible. Anti-UV protection with. the shortest of lifespans; thus On the Fast Cat 435, here is is ensured by a synthetic Use: cruising, racing. even with a sheath (or a the link between the textile sheath: aesthetically, it coating) to protect it from UV, shroud and the lower stainless therefore appears like a woven it does not appear to be steel terminal. fibre. Other qualities: Dynex SINGLE STRAND VERSUS DYNEX DUX®. Let’s take the example of a fast multihull, a 12-metre racing trimaran with a 17.5-metre rotating wing mast, supported by 10mm diameter cap shrouds, 18 metres long, and 8mm diameter shrouds, 14 metres long (we can consider that the bottlescrews have already been replaced by lashings). The forestay is considered to be in stainless steel, but it supports roller reefing gear, and stainless steel is retained. IN SINGLE STRAND STAINLESS STEEL. A single strand stainless steel cable, 10mm in diameter (1 x 19 of 2mm) weighs 0.495 kg per metre, the cap shrouds will therefore weigh: 36 x 0.495 = 17.82 kg. A single strand stainless steel cable, 8mm in diameter (1 x 19 of 1.6 mm), weighs: 0.317 kg per metre, the shrouds will therefore weigh: 28 x 0,317 = 8.876 kg. Giving a total weight of: 26.696 kg. To which must be added the terminals, which can be estimated at 5 kilos. The weight of the lashings is negligible. Giving an approximate total of: 30 kilos. IN DYNEX DUX®. Colligo Marine, in Arizona, in the United States, considers that for an equivalent strength, 11mm Dynex Dux® should be used for the cap shrouds, and 9mm for the shrouds; with its titanium terminals . A reel (100m) of 11mm weighs 8.3 kg, giving 0.083 kg per metre, and, for our 36 metres: 2.988 kilos for the cap shrouds. A reel of 9mm weighs 5.4 kg, giving 0.054 kg per metre, and for our 28 metres: 1,512 kilos. Giving a standing rigging weight of 4.5 kilos. With the titanium terminals, this gives a total of approximately 6 kilos. The weight saving is nearly 24 kilos aloft. This is certainly not huge, but kilos aloft are the most penalising. In addition, we can also make savings on the running rigging (the halyards). Pitching is reduced; we therefore sail faster! Colligo Marine in the United States, supplied us with an estimate of 1,379.32 US $ exc. taxes for the 11mm cap shrouds in Dynex Dux®, with termi- nals, lashings etc., and 995.72 US $ for the 9mm shrouds, and their peripherals. Giving a total of 2,375. 04 US $ exc. taxes, or (at end of December rates) 1,646.89€ exc. taxes. Of course the prices elsewhere will be noticeably different. The differential with stainless steel single strand is therefore not very great. Colligo products are distributed in France on the one hand by Delta Voiles, and on the other, by Christian Malardeau, the Corsair trimaran importer.
Anzeige