This session was presented at #SIDLIT2017 on Thursday, August 3, 2017 and focused on how to spot fake news. Several steps were outlined to verify the accuracy of everything from email chain letters to websites to Facebook postings. Included in the session is information on known fake news sites, and key characteristics of bogusness. The presentation also discusses critical thinking, logical fallacies, useful sites for checking the veracity of information commonly found online as well as steps everyone can take to fight the prevalence of fake news (the bad news phenomenon).
3. What’s the Problem?
“The fictions and fabrications that comprise fake news
are but a subset of the larger bad news phenomenon,
which also encompasses many forms of shoddy,
unresearched, error-filled, and deliberately misleading
reporting that do a disservice to everyone….”
from “We Have a Bad News Problem, Not a
Fake News Problem” by David Mikkelson,
Snopes.com founder
4. A FACT: IS A STATEMENT THAT IS
TRUE AND CAN BE VERIFIED OBJECTIVELY, OR
PROVEN. IN OTHER WORDS, A FACT IS
TRUE AND CORRECT NO MATTER WHAT.
Source: Study.com.
5. What’s the Problem?
“Facts are stubborn things; and
whatever may be our wishes, our
inclinations, or the dictates of our
passion, they cannot alter the
state of facts and evidence.”
John Adams
6. An OPINION: HOWEVER, IS A STATEMENT
THAT HOLDS AN ELEMENT OF BELIEF; IT TELLS HOW
SOMEONE FEELS. AN OPINION IS NOT ALWAYS TRUE
AND CANNOT BE PROVEN. OPINIONS OFTEN
INCLUDE BIASED WORDS (BEAUTIFUL, MISERABLE,
EXCITING, FRIGHTFUL)
Source: Study.com and Broward College, College Readiness Course, see https://goo.gl/IdF8cg.
7. True! Also called Pomato, see wikipedia.org, Modernfarmer.com,
Businessinsider.com, Telegraph.co.uk, BBC.com and more
8. “Do some investigating. Research the
factual claims in the story to see if there
is published evidence to support or
contradict them. Challenge the teller of
the tale to produce evidence that what
they've told you is true. The burden of
proof is on them. “
Thoughtco.com from “Eight Ways to Spot an
Urban Legend.”
9. Check sources, if a post or article makes
claims based on a specific source:
•Check to be sure the source says what
is claimed.
•Check the affiliation of the source.
•Check the credentials of the “authority.”
•Have the results been replicated?
•Are other news outlets or sources
reporting the “news?”
10. Google it:
“How reliable is telegraph.co.uk” or
“How reliable is MSNBC?” and then
“How reliable is Washington Examiner?”
When sites or publications are cited, check them out…
11.
12. How to Prove a Fact
To test whether a statement
is a fact, ask these three
questions:
Can the statement be
proved or demonstrated to be
true?
Can the statement be
observed in practice or
operation?
Can the statement by
verified by witnesses,
manuscripts, or documents?
Fact Opinion
Is objective Is subjective
Is
discovered
Is Created
States
reality
Interprets
reality
Can be
verified
Cannot be
verified
Presented
with
unbiased
words
Presented
using
biased
words
Source: Broward College, College Readiness Course,
see https://goo.gl/IdF8cg.
15. “The book is always better than the film adaption.”
It is believed that Vice President Pence was involved in a secret
meeting that resulted in Comey’s firing.
"The founding fathers, in their
genius, created a system of
three co-equal branches of
government and a built-in
system of checks and
balances," Clapper said on State
of the Union.* “I feel as though
that is under assault and is
eroding.“ – James Clapper
16. “The book is always better than the film adaption.”
It is believed that Vice President Pence was involved in a secret
meeting that resulted in Comey’s firing.
"The founding fathers, in their
genius, created a system of
three co-equal branches of
government and a built-in
system of checks and
balances," Clapper said on State
of the Union.* “I feel as though
that is under assault and is
eroding.“ – James Clapper
17. Critical Thinking: What Is It?
"Disciplined thinking that is clear, rational,
open-minded, and informed by evidence”
Dictionary.com and Linda Elder, September, 2007, coauthor, The Miniature Guide to Critical
Thinking Concepts and Tools, Foundation for Critical Thinking Press, 2008).
18. Logical Fallacies
Common errors in reasoning
Undermine logic of your argument.
Can be either illegitimate arguments or irrelevant
points
Often identified by lack of evidence that supports the
claim.
19. Logical Fallacies
• Slippery Slope
• Hasty Generalization
• Moral Equiivalence
• Post hoc ergo propter hoc
• Genetic Fallacy
• Begging the Claim
• Circular Argument
• Either/Or
• Ad hominem
• Ad populum
• Red Herring
• Straw Man
20. “I have come to the conclusion that…most people are
so locked into a particular world view that they tend to
reject any information, no matter how well supported,
that contradicts their cherished assumptions…It’s
scary, actually how polarized we have become.”
from David Emery, from 2008, author of About.com’s (now Thoughtco.com’s)
Urban Legends page
21. Philosophical “Spectrum of Change”
What is meant by terms like conservative, liberal, moderate…
“The paradigm does not assume that a person is always in the same position on
virtually every issue….” –Mark Scherer, Historian
REACTIONARY:
wants change, “turn
back the clock” to
the way things were
in an earlier time or
era
CONSERVATIVE:
change only makes
things worse, thus
change itself
becomes a threat
MODERATE:
willing to embrace
change rather
evenly, accepting
some, rejecting
others in balanced
measure
LIBERAL:
searches for
consistent change,
optimistic that
forward movement
is positive and
brings progress
REVOLUTIONAR
Y: finds little to
preserve, wants
radical change,
“start all over”
22. What’s the Problem?
* From a study by computer scientists at Columbia University and the French National Institute.* From a study by computer scientists at Columbia University and the French National Institute.
If people have deeply
held views, they’re
unlikely to change.
59% of readers
share without
reading.
Compounded by…
25. What’s the Solution? “You simply must approach
the internet with skepticism.
It’s chock full of
misinformation, and a lot of
it shows up in your email
inbox.” [and on Facebook]
Leo Notenboom, 18 years
Programmer at Microsoft, author,
blogger and podcaster.
26. Meme (pronounced Mee-m)
A cultural item that is transmitted by repetition and
replication in a manner analogous to the biological
transmission of genes.
Dictionary.com
A cultural item in the form
of an image, video,
phrase, etc., that is
spread via the Internet
and often altered in a
creative or humorous way.
27. “Hear ye my fellow
citizens, to believe all
prose posted on the
Internet is to court folly.”
28. What’s the Solution?
Stay skeptical, read and think critically.
Everything in print is not necessarily true. Too good to be true,
it’s probably not true.
Question what you read.
Evaluate each paragraph or statement, is it fact or opinion.
Evaluate the author and the source.
Understand if a natural bias exists (Heritage Foundation vs
Occupy Democrats).
Understand the difference between an informed opinion and an
expert opinion (well-informed person vs. expert in their field).
29. What’s the Solution?
Don’t accept simple answers, most issues are complex.
Beware of news that distracts (click bait) from important issues.
Messages with warnings of good or dire results if you
share/don’t share, just delete.
Beware of generalizations. A study, argument or “fact” that
starts with biased words (always, sometimes, never) is opinion,
not fact.
Don’t live in an information (Facebook) Bubble, read outside
your comfort zone, world view, philosophical spectrum.
Be aware that a single publication may include news, editorial
content, rumor and opinion (not mutually exclusive); e.g.
Borowitz Report, New Yorker.
30.
31. Finally: Read, evaluate, carefully consider what you
share verbally, on Facebook, email and Twitter.
34. Indications of Bogusness!
Anonymous
author
Author
supposedly
famous
Message
riddled with
spelling errors
Quotes
legitimate
source but not
substantiated
1 2
3 4
Source: “That Chain E-mail Your Friend Sent to You Is (Likely) Bogus. Seriously.” by Lori Robertson, FactCheck.org,
posted on March 18, 2008. Also see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fm0LwscDYHs
35. Indications of Bogusness!
Author loves all
caps and
exclamation
points
The message
argues that it is
NOT false
Do the Facts
support the
conclusion?
There’s math
involved, “Do
the Math!”
5 6
7
8
Source: “That Chain E-mail Your Friend Sent to You Is (Likely) Bogus. Seriously.” by Lori Robertson, FactCheck.org,
posted on March 18, 2008.
36. • Is it a fair comparison; was the economic setting the same in
the two months mentioned?
• Did media outlets report this news?
• Can the decrease in the National Debt be attributed to the
new president?
• Are the figures quoted, correct?
Source: www.aol.com/article/news/2017/02/25/trump-tweets-wildly-misleading-comparison-of-the-national-debt-
i/21721587/
37. Resources to Check
www.snopes.com - founded by David Mikkelson in 1994 based
on interest in urban legends. Now oldest and largest fact-
checking site on web, widely regarded by journalists, folklorists,
and laypersons as an essential resource.
www.factcheck.org/ project of Annenberg Public Policy Center,
accepts no funds from corporations, unions, partisan
organizations or advocacy groups. Funded by Annenberg grants
and individuals with donors of $1K or more listed on site.
www.politifact.com/ fact-checking site that rates accuracy of
claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.
goo.gl/JJnPtk Thoughtco.com’s Urban Legend’s page.
goo.gl/tEh8TH Facecrooks.com scam alert site reports
Facebook related scams.
38. Fake News Sites (Satire to Seriousness)
www.callthecops.net Stories: Steven Seagal on short list for new
FBI director. Touted as “America’s most trusted source for
public safety news”…not!
40. Fake News Sites (Satire to Seriousness)
www.callthecops.net Stories: “Steven Seagal on short list for
new FBI director.” Touted as “America’s most trusted source for
public safety news”…not!
www.theonion.com Stories: “’Leaking sure is cool, huh, guys?’
says disguised John Kelly to White House aides,” and “U.S.
forces take control of White House.”
41.
42. Fake News Sites (Satire to Seriousness)
www.callthecops.net Stories: “Steven Seagal on short list for
new FBI director.” Touted as “America’s most trusted source for
public safety news”…not!
www.theonion.com Stories: “’Leaking sure is cool, huh, guys?’
says disguised John Kelly to White House aides,” and “U.S.
forces take control of White House.”
www.infowars.com Stories: “Millions voted illegally in the 2016
presidential election,” “Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting
a hoax,” “Boston Marathon bombing a hoax,” and “Democratic
Party hosting child sex slave ring out of pizza restaurant.”
43.
44. Fake News Sites (Satire to Seriousness)
www.callthecops.net Stories: “Steven Seagal on short list for
new FBI director.” Touted as “America’s most trusted source for
public safety news”…not!
www.theonion.com Stories: “’Leaking sure is cool, huh, guys?’
says disguised John Kelly to White House aides,” and “U.S.
forces take control of White House.”
www.infowars.com Stories: “Millions voted illegally in the 2016
presidential election,” “Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting
a hoax,” “Boston Marathon bombing a hoax,” and “Democratic
Party hosting child sex slave ring out of pizza restaurant.”
thenewyorkevening.com Stories: “Malia Obama expelled
from Harvard,” “Owning a car gives you freedoms the
government doesn’t want you to have,” and “Chinese security
firm remotely hacks tesla brakes.”
45.
46. Additional Sources
Logical Fallacies owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/03/
Defining Critical Thinking
www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766
Fake News in the Workplace
www.forbes.com/sites/markmurphy/2017/07/30/fake-news-has-officially-
And Survey Results
www.leadershipiq.com/blogs/leadershipiq/study-fake-news-hits-the-work
Facebook Bubble:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/16/facebook-bias-bubbl
50. Kansas Policy Institute
Vision: We envision every Kansan having the opportunities
provided through personal freedom to achieve prosperity and
overall well-being, and the State of Kansas being a model of
economic freedom and student-focused education to be
emulated across the country
Mission: Kansas Policy Institute is an independent think tank
guided by the constitutional principles of limited government and
personal freedom. We specialize in student-focused education
and tax and fiscal policy at the state and local level, empowering
citizens, legislators, and other government officials with
objective research and creative ideas to promote a low-tax, pro-
growth environment that preserves the ability of governments to
provide high quality services.
51. Kansas Policy Institute
Vision: We envision every Kansan having the opportunities
provided through personal freedom to achieve prosperity and
overall well-being, and the State of Kansas being a model of
economic freedom and student-focused education to be
emulated across the country
Mission: Kansas Policy Institute is an independent think tank
guided by the constitutional principles of limited government and
personal freedom. We specialize in student-focused education
and tax and fiscal policy at the state and local level, empowering
citizens, legislators, and other government officials with
objective research and creative ideas to promote a low-tax, pro-
growth environment that preserves the ability of governments to
provide high quality services.
Underlining added by the presenter.
52. Fact or Opinion or Mixed?
Now Trump is saying that police should rough people
up and "not be too nice." Good grief. Must he say the
wrong thing every single time? Doesn't he understand
that we have a bit of a problem with police shootings
and brutality? Police have an incredibly difficult job.
Don't give them advice that will hurt innocents and get
the police in trouble. Almost as bad were the police
who cheered the suggestion. That certainly won't
reassure those worried about interacting with police.
Any encounter with Trump ends up making both Trump
and the other person look worse, and the social fabric
gets a little more frayed every time he opens his
mouth.
Exploring Fake News & Alternative Facts [Revised]
Troubling Report Finds Millions of Americans Forced to Make Ends Meet by Getting Up and Going to Work Every Day.
What’s the Problem?
“The fictions and fabrications that comprise fake news are but a subset of the larger bad news phenomenon, which also encompasses many forms of shoddy, unresearched, error-filled, and deliberately misleading reporting that do a disservice to everyone….”
from “We Have a Bad News Problem, Not a Fake News Problem” by David Mikkelson, Snopes.com founder
A FACT: is a statement that is true and can be verified objectively, or proven. In other words, a fact is true and correct no matter what. From Study.com
What’s the Problem?
“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
John Adams
An OPINION: however, is a statement that holds an element of belief; it tells how someone feels. An opinion is not always true and cannot be proven. Opinions often include biased words (beautiful, miserable, exciting, frightful)Source: Study.com and Broward College, College Readiness Course, see https://goo.gl/IdF8cg.
There’s a plant called the “TomTato” which is a cherry tomato plant with Potatoes as roots. It yields large quantities of both Tomatoes and spuds.
Comments: I’m not buying it.
From what I’ve seen, tomatoes and potatoes and capsicum pepper cultivars are interchangeable. Basically anything in the nightshade family will work.
True! Also called Pomato, see wikipedia.org, Modernfarmer.com, Businessinsider.com, Telegraph.co.uk, BBC.com and more
“Do some investigating. Research the factual claims in the story to see if there is published evidence to support or contradict them. Challenge the teller of the tale to produce evidence that what they've told you is true. The burden of proof is on them. “
Thoughtco.com from “Eight Ways to Spot an Urban Legend.”
Thoughco.com is one of six brands or sites that are part of dotdash.com, formerly known as about.com. Thoughtco deals with life-long learning and one of the other brands is Lifewire which has the subtitle of Tech Untangled.
Check sources, if a post or article makes claims based on a specific source:
Check to be sure the source says what is claimed.
Check the affiliation of the source.
Check the credentials of the “authority.”
Have the results been replicated?
Are other news outlets or sources reporting the “news?”
When sites or publications are cited, check them out…
A judgment on a source’s reliability should not be based on a single rating or single occurrence. Many publications offer news, opinion, humor and satire.
Google: “How reliable is telegraph.co.uk” or “How reliable is MSNBC?” and then “How reliable is Washington Examiner?”
How to Prove a Fact
To test whether a statement is a fact, ask these three questions:
Can the statement be proved or demonstrated to be true?
Can the statement be observed in practice or operation?
Can the statement by verified by witnesses, manuscripts, or documents?
Source: Broward College, College Readiness Course, see https://goo.gl/IdF8cg.
Opinionated and Biased Words
Watch out for Qualifiers!
All, always, appear, believe, could, every, has/have to, I feel
it is believed, likely, may, might, must, Never
Often, ought to, possibly, probably, seem, should, only, sometimes, think, usually
“The book is always better than the film adaption.”
It is believed that Vice President Pence was involved in a secret meeting that resulted in Comey’s firing.
"The founding fathers, in their genius, created a system of three co-equal branches of government and a built-in system of checks and balances," Clapper said on State of the Union.* “I feel as though that is under assault and is eroding.“ – James Clapper
Hosted by CNN's Jake Tapper, State of the Union features interviews with top newsmakers on politics and policy -- covering Washington, the country and the world.
“The book is always better than the film adaption.”
It is believed that Vice President Pence was involved in a secret meeting that resulted in Comey’s firing.
"The founding fathers, in their genius, created a system of three co-equal branches of government and a built-in system of checks and balances," Clapper said on State of the Union.* “I feel as though that is under assault and is eroding.“ – James Clapper
Hosted by CNN's Jake Tapper, State of the Union features interviews with top newsmakers on politics and policy -- covering Washington, the country and the world.
Defining critical thinking http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766
Critical thinking is self-guided, self-disciplined thinking which attempts to reason at the highest level of quality in a fair-minded way. People who think critically consistently attempt to live rationally, reasonably, empathically. They are keenly aware of the inherently flawed nature of human thinking when left unchecked. They strive to diminish the power of their egocentric and sociocentric tendencies. They use the intellectual tools that critical thinking offers – concepts and principles that enable them to analyze, assess, and improve thinking. They work diligently to develop the intellectual virtues of intellectual integrity, intellectual humility, intellectual civility, intellectual empathy, intellectual sense of justice and confidence in reason. They realize that no matter how skilled they are as thinkers, they can always improve their reasoning abilities and they will at times fall prey to mistakes in reasoning, human irrationality, prejudices, biases, distortions, uncritically accepted social rules and taboos, self-interest, and vested interest. They strive to improve the world in whatever ways they can and contribute to a more rational, civilized society. At the same time, they recognize the complexities often inherent in doing so. They avoid thinking simplistically about complicated issues and strive to appropriately consider the rights and needs of relevant others. They recognize the complexities in developing as thinkers, and commit themselves to life-long practice toward self-improvement. They embody the Socratic principle: The unexamined life is not worth living , because they realize that many unexamined lives together result in an uncritical, unjust, dangerous world. ~ Linda Elder, September, 2007, coauthor, The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools, Foundation for Critical Thinking Press, 2008).
"Disciplined thinking that is clear, rational, open-minded, and informed by evidence:http://www.dictionary.com/browse/critical-thinking
“Fallacies are common errors in reasoning that will undermine the logic of your argument. Fallacies can be either illegitimate arguments or irrelevant points, and are often identified because they lack evidence that supports their claim. Avoid these common fallacies in your own arguments and watch for them in the arguments of others.”
Simply put, while facts may be accurate, the conclusion drawn from those facts may be illogical.
Slippery Slope: This is a conclusion based on the premise that if A happens, then eventually through a series of small steps, through B, C,..., X, Y, Z will happen, too, basically equating A and Z. So, if we don't want Z to occur, A must not be allowed to occur either. Example: If we ban Hummers because they are bad for the environment eventually the government will ban all cars, so we should not ban Hummers.
In this example, the author is equating banning Hummers with banning all cars, which is not the same thing.
Hasty Generalization: This is a conclusion based on insufficient or biased evidence. In other words, you are rushing to a conclusion before you have all the relevant facts. Example:
Even though it's only the first day, I can tell this is going to be a boring course.
In this example, the author is basing his evaluation of the entire course on only the first day, which is notoriously boring and full of housekeeping tasks for most courses. To make a fair and reasonable evaluation the author must attend not one but several classes, and possibly even examine the textbook, talk to the professor, or talk to others who have previously finished the course in order to have sufficient evidence to base a conclusion on.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc: This is a conclusion that assumes that if 'A' occurred after 'B' then 'B' must have caused 'A.' Example:
I drank bottled water and now I am sick, so the water must have made me sick.
In this example, the author assumes that if one event chronologically follows another the first event must have caused the second. But the illness could have been caused by the burrito the night before, a flu bug that had been working on the body for days, or a chemical spill across campus. There is no reason, without more evidence, to assume the water caused the person to be sick.
Genetic Fallacy: This conclusion is based on an argument that the origins of a person, idea, institute, or theory determine its character, nature, or worth. Example:
The Volkswagen Beetle is an evil car because it was originally designed by Hitler's army.
In this example the author is equating the character of a car with the character of the people who built the car. However, the two are not inherently related.
Begging the Claim: The conclusion that the writer should prove is validated within the claim. Example:
Filthy and polluting coal should be banned.
Arguing that coal pollutes the earth and thus should be banned would be logical. But the very conclusion that should be proved, that coal causes enough pollution to warrant banning its use, is already assumed in the claim by referring to it as "filthy and polluting."
Circular Argument: This restates the argument rather than actually proving it. Example:
George Bush is a good communicator because he speaks effectively.
In this example, the conclusion that Bush is a "good communicator" and the evidence used to prove it "he speaks effectively" are basically the same idea. Specific evidence such as using everyday language, breaking down complex problems, or illustrating his points with humorous stories would be needed to prove either half of the sentence.
Either/or: This is a conclusion that oversimplifies the argument by reducing it to only two sides or choices. Example:
We can either stop using cars or destroy the earth.
In this example, the two choices are presented as the only options, yet the author ignores a range of choices in between such as developing cleaner technology, car-sharing systems for necessities and emergencies, or better community planning to discourage daily driving.
Ad hominem: This is an attack on the character of a person rather than his or her opinions or arguments. Example:
Green Peace's strategies aren't effective because they are all dirty, lazy hippies.
In this example, the author doesn't even name particular strategies Green Peace has suggested, much less evaluate those strategies on their merits. Instead, the author attacks the characters of the individuals in the group.
Ad populum: This is an emotional appeal that speaks to positive (such as patriotism, religion, democracy) or negative (such as terrorism or fascism) concepts rather than the real issue at hand. Example:
If you were a true American you would support the rights of people to choose whatever vehicle they want.
In this example, the author equates being a "true American," a concept that people want to be associated with, particularly in a time of war, with allowing people to buy any vehicle they want even though there is no inherent connection between the two.
Red Herring: This is a diversionary tactic that avoids the key issues, often by avoiding opposing arguments rather than addressing them. Example:
The level of mercury in seafood may be unsafe, but what will fishers do to support their families?
In this example, the author switches the discussion away from the safety of the food and talks instead about an economic issue, the livelihood of those catching fish. While one issue may affect the other it does not mean we should ignore possible safety issues because of possible economic consequences to a few individuals.
Straw Man: This move oversimplifies an opponent's viewpoint and then attacks that hollow argument.
People who don't support the proposed state minimum wage increase hate the poor.
In this example, the author attributes the worst possible motive to an opponent's position. In reality, however, the opposition probably has more complex and sympathetic arguments to support their point. By not addressing those arguments, the author is not treating the opposition with respect or refuting their position.
Moral Equivalence: This fallacy compares minor misdeeds with major atrocities.
That parking attendant who gave me a ticket is as bad as Hitler.
In this example, the author is comparing the relatively harmless actions of a person doing their job with the horrific actions of Hitler. This comparison is unfair and inaccurate.
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/03/ logical fallacies
“I have come to the conclusion that…most people are so locked into a particular world view that they tend to reject any information, no matter how well supported, that contradicts their cherished assumptions…It’s scary, actually how polarized we have become.”
from David Emery, from 2008, author of About.com’s (now Thoughtco.com’s) Urban Legends page
Bursting the Facebook bubble: we asked voters on the left and right to swap feeds The Guardian, November 16, 2016.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/16/facebook-bias-bubble-us-election-conservative-liberal-news-feed
Philosophical “Spectrum of Change”
What is meant by terms like conservative, liberal, moderate…
REVOLUTIONARY: finds little to preserve, wants radical change, “start all over”
LIBERAL: searches for consistent change, optimistic that forward movement is positive and brings progress
MODERATE: willing to embrace change rather evenly, accepting some, rejecting others in balanced measure
CONSERVATIVE: change only makes things worse, thus change itself becomes a threat
REACTIONARY: wants change, “turn back the clock” to the way things were in an earlier day
“The paradigm does not assume that a person is always in the same position on virtually every issue but it does assume some consistency…the relative nature of these terms must be understood in their use. For example, a revolutionary would consider a liberal rather moderate; likewise, to a reactionary a conservative is liberal.” Mark Scherer, Historian, author of the 3-volume The Journey of a People.
What’s the Problem?
If people have deeply held views, they’re unlikely to change.
“People are more willing to share an article than read it….This is typical of modern information consumption. People form an opinion based on a summary, or a summary of summaries, without making the effort to go deeper.”
From a study by a group of computer scientists at Columbia University and the French National Institute based on a dataset of over 2.8 million online news articles that were shared via Twitter.
59% of links shared on Twitter have never actually been clicked by that person’s followers…that is, we share without reading.
The first is a factor of attention span; attention spans are at an all-time low, and most users make snap decisions about articles based on their first impressions, which happen to be headlines.
The second is a factor of effort. It takes considerably less time and effort to share an article than it does to actually read it. It also comes with greater rewards; sharing an article is likely to earn you attention from friends and social media followers, or demonstrate that you’ve read the article, whereas actually reading it doesn’t earn you anything extrinsic.
From Forbes.com
Why doesn’t anyone read anymore? “In the age of readily available information and countless ways to get it, we seem to be losing touch with our powers of comprehension.”
From April 1, 2014 NPR.ORG post
4.7K reactions
360 Comments
295 Shares
The implication was that anyone who commented on the article certainly didn’t actually read it—resulting in more than one layer of irony as social users (and proven non-readers) fervently commented their outrage at the idea that people were non-readers.
Comments: I still read books. I love the smell and feel of turning the page.
Comment #2: Me too!
IFLScience.com recently conducted a similar experiment, publishing an article titled Marijuana Contains “Alien DNA” From Outside Of Our Solar System, NASA Confirms. The article, as of now, has over 141,000 shares, and it isn’t about marijuana or alien DNA at all – it’s an experiment to see how many shares it could attract with an outrageous headline alone. IFLScience states within the post that “We here at IFLS noticed long ago that many of our followers will happily like, share, and offer an opinion on an article – all without ever reading it.”
What is IFLScience? PRO-SCIENCE
These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias, but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Notes: IFL Science is a website that publishes the lighter side of science. A word of caution with IFL Science is they do present some stories with a left of center bias. (12/12/2016) from Media Bias/Fact Check
What’s the Solution?
“You simply must approach the internet with skepticism. It’s chock full of misinformation, and a lot of it shows up in your email inbox.” [and on Facebook]
Leo Notenboom, 18 years Programmer at Microsoft, author, blogger and podcaster.ng
Everything in print is not necessarily true.
We all share news in the digital age, let’s be sure it’s accurate.
“…forwarding email that is in fact wrong is kind of like putting garbage in the inboxes of all your friends and family; at best, you’re wasting their time, and at worst, you’re causing unnecessary anxiety.” Leo Notenboom
Meme (pronounced Mee-m)
A cultural item that is transmitted by repetition and replication in a manner analogous to the biological transmission of genes.
A cultural item in the form of an image, video, phrase, etc., that is spread via the Internet and often altered in a creative or humorous way.
You Lost Your Phone and it’s on silent?
Too bad, if you liked it, you shoulda put a ring on it.
“Hear ye my fellow citizens, to believe all prose posted on the Internet is to court folly.”
What’s the Solution?
Stay skeptical, read and think critically.
Everything in print is not necessarily true. Too good to be true, it’s probably not true.
Question what you read.
Evaluate each paragraph or statement, is it fact or opinion.
Evaluate the author and the source.
Understand if a natural bias exists (Heritage Foundation vs Occupy Democrats).
Understand the difference between an informed opinion and an expert opinion (well-informed person vs. expert in their field).
What’s the Solution?
Don’t accept simple answers, most issues are complex.
Beware of news that distracts (click bait) from important issues.
Messages with warnings of good or dire results if you share/don’t share, just delete.
Beware of generalizations. A study, argument or “fact” that starts with biased words (always, sometimes, never) is opinion, not fact.
Don’t live in an information (Facebook) Bubble, read outside your comfort zone, world view, philosophical spectrum.
Be aware that a single publication may include news, editorial content, rumor and opinion (not mutually exclusive); e.g. Borowitz Report, New Yorker.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/16/facebook-bias-bubble-us-election-conservative-liberal-news-feed “Bursting the Facebook bubble: we asked voters on the left and right to swap feeds” from The Guardian.
Satire from the Borowitz Report
Comedians protest Scaramucci’s ouster
Trump Supporters Furious that they still have health care.
Finally: Read, evaluate, carefully consider what you share verbally, on Facebook, email and Twitter.
On 23 December 2014, the website Alliance for Natural Health published an article titled “Half of All Children Will Be Autistic by 2025, Warns Senior Research Scientist at MIT.” It described a dire
prognostication made “at a conference” in early December by Stephanie Seneff, PhD (whose web biographydescribed her as a “Senior Research Scientist at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory,” not an individual specializing in epidemiology.) The precise location, date, and general scope of the December 2014 conference in question was not disclosed in the article, but a reference was made to the general subject of genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
The headline’s reference to looming autism diagnosis spikes was continued in the article’s first line: “Evidence points to glyphosate toxicity from the overuse of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide.”
The article conflated a number of unrelated claims and beliefs about autism and its causes, jumping from pesticides to vaccines and back again in the course of its travels. A USDA report issued in December 2014 about acceptable levels of pesticides (that made no mention at all of autism) was among the cited material:
Both the article and Seneff’s biography mention work with the group AutismOne, a group of parents (not scientists) who’ve espoused the fervent belief autism is caused not by genetic factors but environmental contaminants.
The real cause of increasing autism prevalence?
Autism vs. Organic Food sales
The author is anonymous. Practically all e-mails we see fall into this category, and anytime an author is unnamed, the public should be skeptical. If the story were true, why would the author not put his or her name on it?
The author is supposedly a famous person. Of course, e-mails that are attributed to legitimate people turn out to be false as well. Those popular messages about a Jay Leno essay and Andy Rooney’s political views are both baloney. And we found that some oft-quoted words attributed to Abraham Lincoln were not his words at all.
There’s a reference to a legitimate source that completely contradicts the information in the e-mail. Some e-mails will implore readers to check out the claims, even providing a link to a respected source. We’re not sure why some people don’t click on the link, but we implore you to do so. Go ahead, take the challenge. See if the information you find actually backs up the e-mail. We’ve examined three such emails in which the back-up material clearly debunks the e-mail itself. One message provided a link to the Tax Foundation, but anyone who followed it would have found an article saying the e-mail’s figures were all wrong. Another boasted that Snopes.com had verified the e-mail, but Snopes actually said it was false. Update, Nov. 19, 2014: Phishing attempts have become more sophisticated, so before you click on a hyperlink in the email make sure that it is in fact the correct URL and will bring you to the respected source you want.
The message is riddled with spelling errors. Ask yourself, why should you trust an author who is not only anonymous but partially illiterate?
Source: “That Chain E-mail Your Friend Sent to You Is (Likely) Bogus. Seriously.” by Lori Robertson, FactCheck.org, posted on March 18, 2008. Also see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fm0LwscDYHs
The author just loves using exclamation points. If the author had a truthful point to make, he or she wouldn’t need to put two, three, even five exclamation points after every other sentence. In fact, we’re developing another theory here: The more exclamation points used in an e-mail, the less true it actually is. (Ditto for excessive use of capital letters.)
The message argues that it is NOT false. This tip comes from Emery, who advises skepticism for any message that says, “This is NOT a hoax!”
There’s math involved. Check it. One message that falsely claimed more soldiers died during Bill Clinton’s term than during George W. Bush’s urged, “You do the Math!” We did. It’s wrong.
Do the Facts support the conclusion?
Source: “That Chain E-mail Your Friend Sent to You Is (Likely) Bogus. Seriously.” by Lori Robertson, FactCheck.org, posted on March 18, 2008.
“On Saturday morning, President Donald Trump took to Twitter to point out a fact he thought the media was underreporting: the decrease in the national debt in his first month.
"The media has not reported that the National Debt in my first month went down by $12 billion vs a $200 billion increase in Obama first mo[nth]," tweeted Trump.
Is it a fair comparison; was the economic setting the same in the two months mentioned?
Did media outlets report this news?
Can the decrease in the National Debt be attributed to the new president?
Are the figures quoted, correct?
https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/02/25/trump-tweets-wildly-misleading-comparison-of-the-national-debt-i/21721587/
www.snopes.com - founded by David Mikkelson in 1994 based on interest in urban legends. Now oldest and largest fact-checking site on web, widely regarded by journalists, folklorists, and laypersons as an essential resource.
www.factcheck.org/ project of Annenberg Public Policy Center, accepts no funds from corporations, unions, partisan organizations or advocacy groups. Funded by Annenberg grants and individuals with donors of $1K or more listed on site.
www.politifact.com/ fact-checking site that rates accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.
goo.gl/JJnPtk Thoughtco.com’s Urban Legend’s page.
goo.gl/tEh8TH Facecrooks.com scam alert site reports Facebook related scams.
Facecrook’s motto: “Don’t get crooked by the book.”
Fake News Sites (Satire to Seriousness)
www.callthecops.net Stories: Steven Seagal on short list for new FBI director. Touted as “America’s most trusted source for public safety news”…not!
Steven Seagal on short list for new FBI director.
National Donut Day adds 1% body fat to NYPD’s fittest cop.
http://www.callthecops.net/
Fake News Sites (Satire to Seriousness)
www.theonion.com Stories: “’Leaking sure is cool, huh, guys?’ says disguised John Kelly to White House aides,” and “U.S. forces take control of White House.”
Home Depot releases new bluetooth cordless hose
Fake News Sites (Satire to Seriousness)
www.infowars.com Stories: “Millions voted illegally in the 2016 presidential election,” “Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting a hoax,” “Boston Marathon bombing a hoax,” and “Democratic Party hosting child sex slave ring out of pizza restaurant.”
Seymour Hersh claims Seth Rich was DNC Email Leaker
Today on the Alex Jones Show
CNN is fake News Contest
Fake News Sites (Satire to Seriousness)
thenewyorkevening.com Stories: “Malia Obama expelled from Harvard,” “Owning a car gives you freedoms the government doesn’t want you to have,” and “Chinese security firm remotely hacks tesla brakes.”
FEMA investigator’s Shock 9/11 Claim: ‘Vault contents emptied before attack…They knew it was going to happen’
Two American Man Beats Muslim refugee to death for raping 13 year old girl. Do You support this?
Robert Redford says Michelle and Barack Obama Should Get Five Years in Prison. Do You Support Him?
Jut in Kathy Griffin leaving US for four years because of Trump Presidency. Do You Support This?
Tehnology and Jut misspelled.
Gowdy was right! Comey lied under oath! Bombshell proof emerges.
Tehnology (spelling)
Additional Sources
Logical Fallacies owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/03/
Defining Critical Thinking www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766
Fake News in the Workplace www.forbes.com/sites/markmurphy/2017/07/30/fake-news-has-officially-infected-the-workplace-and-its-bad/#17caee93ca3b
And Survey Results www.leadershipiq.com/blogs/leadershipiq/study-fake-news-hits-the-workplace
Facebook Bubble: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/16/facebook-bias-bubble-us-election-conservative-liberal-news-feed
https://askleo.com/why_shouldnt_i_forward_this_email_asking_me_to_forward_to_everyone_i_know/
https://www.thoughtco.com/ways-to-spot-an-urban-legend-3298274
https://www.thoughtco.com/urban-legends-4132595
Did Janet Reno ever actually say such a thing? No. There’s no public record of Janet Reno having declared anything like this. Moreover, Reno was suffering from late-stage Parkinson’s disease during the final years of her life and had difficulty speaking at all. When the New York Times attempted to interview her in the summer of 2016 (after Donald Trump had become the GOP nominee), they were unable to do so, even with the help of Reno’s sister.
We can safely assume that Reno, a lifelong Democrat, did not support Donald Trump for president, but there’s no evidence she ever expressed the sentiment that he would not be elected during her lifetime. Like similar claims that conservative gadfly Phyllis Schlafly, who died in September 2016, said “There will be a woman president over my dead body,” it’s just an attempt at ironic humor at the expense of the recently deceased.
Kansas Policy Institute
Vision: We envision every Kansan having the opportunities provided through personal freedom to achieve prosperity and overall well-being, and the State of Kansas being a model of economic freedom and student-focused education to be emulated across the country
Mission: Kansas Policy Institute is an independent think tank guided by the constitutional principles of limited government and personal freedom. We specialize in student-focused education and tax and fiscal policy at the state and local level, empowering citizens, legislators, and other government officials with objective research and creative ideas to promote a low-tax, pro-growth environment that preserves the ability of governments to provide high quality services.
Kansas Policy Institute
Vision: We envision every Kansan having the opportunities provided through personal freedom to achieve prosperity and overall well-being, and the State of Kansas being a model of economic freedom and student-focused education to be emulated across the country
Mission: Kansas Policy Institute is an independent think tank guided by the constitutional principles of limited government and personal freedom. We specialize in student-focused education and tax and fiscal policy at the state and local level, empowering citizens, legislators, and other government officials with objective research and creative ideas to promote a low-tax, pro-growth environment that preserves the ability of governments to provide high quality services.
Underlining added by the presenter.
Fact or Opinion or Mixed?
Now Trump is saying that police should rough people up and "not be too nice." Good grief. Must he say the wrong thing every single time? Doesn't he understand that we have a bit of a problem with police shootings and brutality? Police have an incredibly difficult job. Don't give them advice that will hurt innocents and get the police in trouble. Almost as bad were the police who cheered the suggestion. That certainly won't reassure those worried about interacting with police. Any encounter with Trump ends up making both Trump and the other person look worse, and the social fabric gets a little more frayed every time he opens his mouth.