SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 98
Download to read offline
Guanxi   psychological contract
Guanxi
psychological contract




                         1
1960                                                                   Argyris
1960                       psychological work contract
                                          Argyris     1960
foreman


                                                                              ….




              Guanxi


       1992
                        Jacobs, 1979             1948




                                               2000




                       Janssens, Sels & Brande, 2003         Herriot   2001


                                    2
Rousseau 1995




                2001




1.



2.



3.

4.




                       3
Guanxi



                 2000
         social tie
                                       interpersonal connections       Xin & Pearce,
1996
                                   1982




                          1999


                          1997                1998


                                  social capital                    social exchange
                                                                          Butterfield,
1983                       Pye, 1982                                          1988

                                                                             objective
guanxi                                                             subjective guanxi
                                                       1996
                                         Guanxi base



  .




                                          4
Jacob, 1979
1992
                                                                      Farth, Earley,
& Lin, 1997; Farth, Tsui, Xin, & Cheng, 1998; Ho, 1998; Jacob, 1979; Yang, 1994;
Tsui & Farh, 1997; Tsui, Farh, & Xin, 2000




                                                        2007



1999
                                    ...              1997




                                              2000




                                                                        Farh et al.,
1998
                identity                                                    Dunfee
& Warren, 2001                      1995              1996


  Kiong & Kee, 1998
                                                               1999




                1988


                                          5
1989              1999




                              non-job related               Chan, 1995; Chang and Holt,
1991; Yan, 1996; Yang, 1994



                                                                          1988




                                                                                 1993
                                                                            Foa & Foa,
1976                     1989                   1999




                                             1981
                                     1988                  1996
                                                    1988
           Tedeschi & Riess, 1981


                1988

                                         6
1993
                                                                         2008
                            Park & Luo, 2001
       Standifird & Marshall, 2000




1993



                                                               Chan, 1995; Chang
& Holt, 1991; Chen & Peng, 2008; Yan, 1996; Yang, 1994
                              Park & Luo, 2001              2002




    Schein   1980




             mutuality    Davis and Newstrom 1989




                            Rousseau     1989
  belief


                                                         Rousseau


                                     perception



                                         7
Levinson, Price, Munder, Mandl and Solley 1962
                      Morrison   1994             Levinson
                                                     predictability
interdependence                  psychological distance                    changeable
           crisis management      Rousseau 1995
       1
                  2
   3


       4
                                                                         2004
                            1
                                                             2            promise
                                                      Rousseau & Parks, 1993
                                                                                 3
                  individual perception       Rousseau & Tijoriwala, 1998

                                                      1
                                                                      2
                                                                          1999
                        3
   4                                                          5
                                 6
           …
Robinson, Kraatz, & Rousseau, 1994




  MacNeil 1985                                             transactional contract
           relational contract            Rousseau and Parks      1993




                                          8
organiztion-specific skills




                                                         mutual adjustment


                 2002          Rousseau       1995




                                                                       Rousseau and
Wade-Benzoni 1994       Rousseau 1995         Tsui, Pearce, Porter, and Tripoli 1997
       Hui, Lee, and Rousseau 2004




                                          Hui, Lee, & Rousseau, 2004; Rousseau,
1995     Rousseau   2000
                                     hybrid contract




                                                                transitional contract
                                               (                   )




                                          9
2004




                             MacNeil 1985             Rousseau 1995



    Rousseau   1995        Tsui et al.   1997




                         Rousseau, 2000




                   social network


                                                                               informal
networks                            social identity
                                                 attitudes       perceptions
  behaviors                         Ho & Levesque, 2005; Rice & Aydin, 1991
                                                                          Burt, 1992;
Ibarra, 1995; Podolny & Baron, 1997


Van Dyne and Ang 1998




                                          Ho, Rousseau, and Levesque 2006




  Mitchell, 1969                          emic perspective
                                                                      Yeung & Tung,


                                            10
1996                                                                         place
              security          trust                  prescribed role     Hammond
& Glenn, 2004




              1988




                         1993


  Yan, 1996                             Chan, Cheng, & Szeto, 2002; Yang, 1994

                                            employment relationship
                                                            Coyle-Shapiro & Conway
  2005
                                                       Blau, 1964           MacNeil
  1985                                                                           Blau
  1964                                                 Robinson, Kraatz, & Rousseau,
1994
                                          Millward, 1998




                                            11
Chen & Peng, 2008            1994                      1989
1990                     1991              1988
                                     1985            1999              2002
                     Chan, 1995; Chang & Holt, 1991; Chen & Peng, 2008; Yan,
1996; Yang, 1994
                 Park & Luo, 2002            2002



           MacNeil, 1985; Rousseau, 1995; Rousseau & Parks, 1993
                                             2004


                                                     Robinson & Morrison, 1995;
Rousseau, 1995
                                       Hui, Lee, & Rousseau, 2004; Rousseau,
1995; Rousseau & Wade-Benzoni, 1994; Tsui, Pearce, Porter, & Tripoli, 1997


                                                              Rousseau, 2000
                                                                          1988




                                      12
3-1




                        3-1




      1-1

      1-2




                1
            [       ]

 1




                              13
2007             2008


                                                   1                 2
             3
1                2                  3
                       3-1


                 3-1




                                                   1988            1999


        2007




    3                           5                              3
                                3                        3
3        6             20                    Likert                  1
         2                  3            4    5
                                                             3-2

                                    14
3-2


         1.
         2.
         3.
         4.
         5.                          (
                            )
         6.
         7.
         8.
         9.
         10.
         11.

         12.
         13.
         14.

         15.
         16.

         17.
         18.
         19.
         20.




         Rousseau    1989
belief




                                     2004

                                15
1                          1   11   11     2
           12      15          4             15                     Likert
            1                      2              3            4
     5      6
                                            3-3


                         3-3


           1.
           2.
           3.
           4.
           5.
           6.
           7.
           8.
           9.
           10.
           11.
           12.
           13.
           14.
           15.




     105           95                                          92
                 87.6%



1.




                                       16
7 8 14 18
                                  3-4


     3-4



     1.
     2.
     3.
     4.
     5.
     6.
     7.
     8.
     9.
     10.
     11.
     12.
     13.
     14.
     15.
     16.
     17.
     18.
     19.
     20.




2.


            6 7 11
                            3-5




                       17
3-5


       1.
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7.
       8.
       9.
       10.
       11.
       12.
       13.
       14.
       15.




                  97    10     7        97     11   22




670         482        71.9%                               44
      438                               65.3         3-6


                                   18
3-6

                                                                    %
                                          670               100.0
                                          188                28.1
                                          482                71.9
                                          438                90.9
                                          44                  9.1
                                                    65.3%




                                                                           3-7



                                           246              56.16%               192
     43.84%



                                                                           26 34
279           63.7             25    87             19.86                  35
72            16.44



                                                264           60.27
                 138       31.51                                36               8.22



                                                    216         49.32
          189          43.15                           33           7.53
                                                7              3                  4




                                     19
41.16
        4                  1                141              32.19    13             126
28.77   35          75             17.12      5               96        21.91



                                                                             79.43
            4                  3             141             32.19      37           147
33.56   7 11        96              21.92         11            54           12.32


                     3-7                                        N=438

                                                                              %
                                                       192           43.84
                                                       246           56.16
            25                                         87            19.86
                                                                                           30.25
            26 34                                      279            63.7
            35                                         72            16.44
                                                       36             8.22
                                                       264           60.27
                                                       138           31.51
                                                       189           43.15
                                                       33             7.53
                                                       216           49.32
            1                                          141           32.19
            13                                         126           28.77                 41.16
            35                                         75            17.12
            5                                          96            21.91
            3                                          141           32.19
            37                                         147           33.56                 79.43
            7 11                                       96            21.92
            11                                         54            12.32




                                             20
3-2




              3-2




      1-1

       1-1a

       1-1b

      1-2

       1-2a




                    21
4-1
4.23                 0.47                                4.05              0.42
              3.95                 0.52                3.72           0.52
                     3.70                 0.56
                       3




         4-1
       4.03                 0.91                         3.97              1.06
                      3.66                 1.09
                               3.5




         4-1
                                                                P   0.05     P    0.01




                                                  22
4-1                                            N 438



          3.95           0.52     0.118*   0.186** -0.081   0.278** 0.142** 0.247**    0.259**
          4.05           0.42              0.305** 0.183** 0.370** 0.139** 0.109*      0.170**
          3.70           0.56                       0.210** 0.275** 0.099* 0.193**     0.054
          3.72           0.52                               0.189** 0.145** 0.017      0.054
          4.23           0.47                                       -0.054  0.050     -0.023
          4.03           0.91                                               0.641** 0.601**
          3.97           1.06                                                         0.520**
          3.66           1.09
*              P    0.05
**             P    0.01


                                                    2
                                              [     ]


         4-2                                               P   0.05




                          4-2                                     N 438

                                                                            t

                                                                           0.569
                                3.97       0.587        3.94      0.478
                                                                           1.269
                                4.09       0.423        4.04      0.427
                                                                           2.119*
                                3.77       0.531        3.65      0.590
                                                                          -1.424
                                3.68       0.560        3.75      0.502
                                                                          -1.535
                                4.20       0.497        4.27      0.459
                                                                          -0.306
                                4.02       0.883        4.05      0.937
                                4.04       0.993        3.93      1.112    1.124
                                3.69       1.106        3.64      1.086    0.485
     *               P     0.05



 2



                                               23
25           26 34                     35
                     4-3     ANOVA




                                                                                                     P
                                                                                       3
     0.05   P    0.01                        Scheffe`s method                  [           ]




                             4-3                                   N 438

                                                                  F                Scheffe
                25           a     26 34     b    35          c

                      3.98            3.98             3.83
                                                                  2.411
                      0.53            0.52             0.53
                      4.15            4.07             3.96           *
                                                                  3.191
                      0.39            0.42             0.42
                      3.96            3.71             3.53           **
                                                                           a       bacbc
                                                                  9.000
                      0.51            0.58             0.44
                      3.77            3.77             3.49           **
                                                                           a       c       bc
                                                                  9.375
                      0.26            0.52             0.59
                      4.12            4.26             4.22
                                                                  1.744
                      0.51            0.46             0.50

                     4.13             4.09             3.76           **
                                                                           bc
                                                                  4.440
                     0.78             0.85             1.13
                     4.08             4.08             3.50
                                                                  9.982** a        c       bc
                     0.82             1.01             1.27
                     3.70             3.72             3.40
                                                                  2.682
                     1.19             0.99             1.35
*                    P 0.05
**                   P 0.01

 3




                                                 24
4-4




                    4-4                                N 438

                                                         F                  Scheffe
                           a          b           c


             3.64              3.95        4.03                **
                                                                        a    bac
                                                       8.040
             0.57              0.50        0.53
             3.86              4.07        4.09                *
                                                                        a    bac
                                                       4.380
             0.52              0.40        0.42
             3.31              3.77        3.67                    **
                                                                        a    bac
                                                       11.319
             0.63              0.52        0.58
             3.60              3.74        3.72
                                                       1.030
             0.63              0.48        0.57
             4.28              4.22        4.27
                                                       0.683
             0.56              0.47        0.45


             3.61              4.01        4.20                **
                                                                        a    c
                                                       6.281
             1.06              0.94        0.75
             3.25              3.98        4.16              **
                                                                        a    bac
                                                      10.960
             1.38              1.05        0.89
             3.52              3.62        3.78
                                                       1.341
             1.57              1.10        0.89
*             P     0.05
**            P     0.01




     4-5


                                      25
P   0.01




             4-5                                               N 438

                                                           F           Scheffe
                  a              b               c


           3.92           3.61            4.03
                                                                   a    bbc
                                                       10.331**
           0.55           0.51            0.48
           4.07           4.12            4.04
                                                       0.581
           0.45           0.26            0.42
           3.72           3.88            3.66
                                                       2.377
           0.59           0.56            0.54
           3.67           4.02            3.72
                                                                   a    bbc
                                                       6.392**
           0.59           0.36            0.47
           4.31           4.03            4.21
                                                                   a    b
                                                       5.640**
           0.54           0.46            0.40


           3.89           4.63            4.06
                                                                   a    bbc
                                                       9.772**
           0.98           0.86            0.81
           4.02           3.91            3.95
                                                       0.305
           1.20           1.00            0.93
           3.48           4.00            3.77
                                                                   a    bac
                                                       5.553**
           1.26           0.74            0.94
 *           P 0.05
 **          P 0.01




                                                                            1
13    35              5                              4-6




                                     26
13




               4-6                                                                N 438

                                                                                  F       Scheffe
           1            a        13       b    35         c   5          d


               4.02                3.86            3.99           3.95
                                                                              2.291
               0.56                0.55            0.44           0.48
               4.11                4.13            4.01           3.93                    a   d
                                                                              5.362**
               0.39                0.43            0.38           0.46                    b   d
               3.72                3.75            3.80           3.53                    b   d
                                                                              4.052**
               0.57                0.62            0.52           0.45                    c   d
               3.70                3.88            3.65           3.60                    b   c
                                                                              5.904**
               0.45                0.50            0.61           0.55                    b   d
               4.26                4.27            4.25           4.15
                                                                              1.538
               0.46                0.49            0.51           0.42


               4.06                4.03            4.14           3.91
                                                                              0.908
               0.85                0.99            0.84           0.92
               4.04                3.88            4.05           3.95
                                                                              0.675
               1.18                1.17            0.96           0.73
               3.56                3.63            3.70           3.82
                                                                              1.113
               1.20                1.17            1.03           0.82
*               P     0.05
**              P     0.01




                             3                37          7 11               11
     4-7
                        P        0.05     P   0.01




                                                                                              11




                                                   27
4-7                                        N 438




               3.92           3.99       3.98          3.87
               0.56           0.49       0.50          0.57
               4.15           4.05       3.97          4.02
               0.43           0.39       0.43          0.44
               3.77           3.75       3.70          3.41
               0.55           0.53       0.60          0.54
               3.74           3.75       3.83          3.40
               0.43           0.55       0.45          0.68
               4.22           4.22       4.25          4.31
               0.47           0.49       0.44          0.50


               4.14           4.10       4.01          3.61
               0.86           0.78       0.93          1.18
               4.14           3.96       4.07          3.43
               1.12           0.86       1.00          1.30
               3.60           3.78       3.65          3.54
               1.19           0.81       1.15          1.36
*                  P   0.05
**                 P   0.01




                              mutiple regression




                                         4-1




         4-8
                                                   F          5.559       P
     0.001

                                           28
P
  0.05
                                                                                            R2
Adjusted R2
               R2        0.037 3.7%                                                  3.7%



                                                                                          F
13.405                        P   0.001




                                                                        R2        0.085   8.5%
                                          8.5%




                   4-8




                                                       0.121*          0.216***
                                                       0.112*          0.041
                                                                       0.140**
                                                       0.043
                                                       5.559***       13.405***
                       F
                       R2                              0.037           0.085
                       Adjusted R2                     0.030           0.078
                   *      P   0.05 **         P   0.01 ***        P   0.001




         4-9
                                        VIF
               F         0.409




                                                  29
4-9




                                                   0.038
                                                   -0.030
                    F                               0.409
                    R2                              0.002
                    Adjusted R2                    -0.003
                *    P   0.05 **   P    0.01 ***      P     0.001




       4-10



                          4-10



1-1a



1-1b



1-2a




                                       30
Guanxi




         2007    2008




            31
1.              2003

2.              2004

3.              2000
4.              1988
      239-288
5.              1993
                                 :
6.              1999                                                        30    7-10
7.                        2006                        -
                            3 25-48
8.                               1989
                                        95-112
9.              1994
10.                      1989
                                                             213-239
11.             2000     SPSS
12.                      2000
13.             1997
14.                                                   2005
                                                                             23       201-257
15.                              2002



16.              2002                                                            18   175-226
17.             2003

18.                       2007                                                            21

19.                                        2007                    Guanxi
      26   1     47-70
20.             2002
21.             1980
22.             1981

23.             1992                                                                      12      143-157
24.             2008                              -

25.             1949                                                                      57-84




                                                  32
26.             1999                                                       12 261-288
27.                     1997                                7    282-338
28.             1988                                                            5
      155-238
29.             1990                                              28        47-64
30.             1994
31.                    1991                                            32      219-232
32.             2005

33.                     2001
             10         4    101-128
34.                     2004                                     —
                         11            2       1-32
35.             2000

36.          1982                                                             345-360

37.             2000
38.                     1999                                               12 291-312
39.                      2001
                                181-198
40.             1948
41.             1988
      7-43
42.             2000
                         181-208
43.             2002
44.             2002                                                   —
                                  21   4     101-127
45.             2006                              Guanxi

46.             1997
47.             1998
48.             1999                                        12    105-179
49.             2001
50.             2000                                                                13
      277-316
51.             2005

52.             1993

53.             2002
                                   229-255
54.             1996

55.             1993


                                                       33
1992
56.            1998

57.            2007                                         —

58.            1996
59.            2000

60.                                             1997
                               39   1   75-92
61.                          1995
               4     2-41
62.                         2001
      43   2   207
63.            2005

64.            2000

65.            2003




1. Alan. P. Fiske. (1991). Structures of Social Life: The four Elementary forms of Human Relations.
    New York: The Free Press.
2. Alston, J. P. (1989). Wa, guanxi, and inhwa: Managerial principles in Japan, China, and Korea.
    Business Horizons, 32(2), 26-31.
3. Ang, S. H., & Leong, S. M. (2000). Out of the months of babes: Business ethics and youths in Asia.
    Journal of Business Ethics, 28(2), 129-144.
4. Argyris, C. P. (1960). Understanding Organizational Behavior. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
5. Armstrong, R. W., & Seng, T. B. (2000). Corporate-customer satisfaction in the banking industry of
    Singapore. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18(3), 97-111.
6. Barnard,C.I. (1938). The Functions of the Executive.Cambridge,Mass: Harvard University Press.
7. Bian, Yanjie. (1997). Bringing Strong Ties Back In: Indirect Connection, Bridges and Job Search in
    China. American Sociological Review, 62.
8. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
9. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, M.A. Harvard
    University Press.
10.Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42,
    339-365.
11.Butterfield, R. A. (1983). The development and use of culturally appropriate curriculum for
    American Indian students. Peabody Journal of Education, 61, 50-66.
12.Cavanaugh, M. A. & Noe, R. A. (1999). Antecedents and consequences of relational components of
    the new psychological contract. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20: 323-340.
13.Chan, M. L. (1995). Jiaoji, Jiaoqing and enterprise management. Thoughts and Speech, 33(3):
    261–293. (In Chinese.)
14.Chan, R. Y. K., Cheng, L. T. W., & Szeto, R. W. F. (2002). The dynamics of guanxi and ethics for
    Chinese executives. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(4), 327-336.


                                                       34
15.Chang, H. C., & Holt, G. R. (1991). The concept of yuan and Chinese interpersonal relationship. In
   S. Ting-Toomey & F. Korzenny(Eds.), Cross-culture
16.Chen, X.-P., & Peng, S. (2008). Guanxi dynamics: Shifts in the closeness of ties between chinese
   coworkers. Management and Organization Review, 4(1):63-80.
17.Chung, W.K. & Hamilton, G.G. (2001). Social Logic as Business Logic: Guanxi, Trustworthiness,
   and the Embeddedness of Chinese Business Practices. Applebaum RP et al (Eds). Rules and
   Networks: The Legal Culture of Global Business Transaction, Oxford, Hart Publications,
   pp325-346.
18.Coyle-Shapiro, J. & Conway, N. (2005). Exchange relationships: An examination of psychological
   contracts and perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 4, 774-781.
19.Coyle-Shapiro, J. & Kessler, I. (2000). Consequences of the psychological contract for the
   employment relationship: A large scale survey. Journal of Management Studies, 37(7), 903-930.
20.Coyle-Shapiro, J. & Kessler, I. (2002). Contingent and non-contingent working in local government:
   Contrasting psychological contracts. Public Administration, 80: 77-101.
21.Coyle-Shapiro, J. & Kessler, I. (2003). The employment relationship in the UK public sector: A
   psychological contract perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2),
   213-230.
22.Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16,
   297-334.
23.Davis, K. & Newstrom, J. W. (1989). Human Behavior at Work: Organizational Behavior, 8th ED.,
   McGraw Hill.
24.Dunfee, T. W., & Warren, D. E. (2001). Is guanxi ethical? A normative analysis of doing business in
   China. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3), 191-204.
25.Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational
   support. Journal Of Applied Psychology, Vol.71, No.3, pp.500-507.
26.Fan, Y. (2002a). Guanxi's consequences: Personal gains at social cost. Journal of Business Ethics,
   38(4), 371-380.
27.Fan, Y. (2002b). Questioning guanxi: Definition, classification and implications. International
   Business Review, 11(5), 543-561.
28.Farh, J., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. (1998). The influence of relational demography and
   Guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4), 471-488.
29.Farth, J. L., Earley, P.C., Lin, S.C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and
   organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.42,
   pp.421-444.
30.Foa, E. & Foa, V. (1976). Resource Theory Social Exchange, In J. Thibaut, J. Spence & R. Carson
   (Eds.), Contemporary Trends in Social Psychology, Morristown, N. J.: General Learning Press.
31.Granovetter, Mark. (1990). The Old and the New Economic Sociology: A history and an Agenda. Pp.
   89-112, in Beyond the Marketplace: Rethinking Economy and Society, edited by Roger Friedland
   and A. F. Robertson. New York: Aldine deGruyter.
32.Guest, D. E. & Conway, N. (2002). Communicating the Psychological Contract: an Employer
   Perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, (12), pp.22-38.
33.Guzzo, R. A., Noonan, K. A., & Elorn, E. (1994). Expatriate managers and psychological contract.
   Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4): 617-626.
34.Hammond, S. C., & Glenn, L. M. (2004). The ancient practice of Chinese social networking:
   Guanxi and social network theory. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 6(1/2), 24-31.
35.Herriot, P. (2001). The employment relationship: a psychological perspective. London: Routledge.
36.Ho, D. Y. F. 1998 . Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance An analysis based on
   methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 1-16.
37.Ho, V. T. & Levesque, L. L. (2005). With a little help from my friend (and substitutes): Social
   referents and influence in psychological contract fulfillment. Organiztion Science, 16, 275-289.
38.Ho, V. T., Rousseau, D. M., & Levesque, L. L. (2006). Social networks and the psychological
   contract: Structural holes, cohesive ties, and beliefs regarding employer obligations. Human
   Relations, 59, 4, 459-481.
39.Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, New York: Harcourt Brace and

                                                 35
World.
40.Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Psychological homeostasis and jen: Conceptual tools for advancing
   psychological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 73, 23-44.
41.Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D.M. (2004). Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 311-321.
42.Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, Opportunity and Diversity of Social Circles in Managerial Managers'
   Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 673-703.
43.Jacobs, J. B. (1979). A preliminary model of particularistic ties in Chinese political alliances:
   Kan-ch’ing and kuan-hsi in a rural Taiwanese township. The China Quarterly, 77, 237-273.
44.Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second-generation Little Jiffy. Psychological, 35, 401-415.
45.Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research, International Ed. New York, NY:
   Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
46.Kiong, T. C., & Kee, Y. P. (1998). Guanxi bases, Xinyong and Chinese Business. British Journal of
   Sociology, 49(1), 75-96.
47.Lee, D. J., Pae, J. H., & Wong, Y. H. (2001). A model of close business relationship in China
   (guanxi). European Journal of Marketing, 35(1/2), 51-69.
48.Lester, S. W., Claire, E., & Kickul, J. (2001). Psychological contracts in the 21st century: What
   Employees value most and how well organizations are responding to these expectations. Humman
   resource planning,Vol.24 ,No.1, p.10-21.
49.Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and Organization.
   Administrative Scuence Quarterly.Vol.9, No.4, pp.370-390.
50.Levinson, H., Price, C., Munder, K., Mandl, H., & Solley, C. (1962). Men, Management and Mental
   Health. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.Lewis-McClear, K., & Taylor, M. S. (1997). Not seeing eye-to-ete:implications of discrepant
   psychological contracts and contract violation for the employment relationship. Academy Of
   Management Proceedings, p.335-340.
52.Li, F. (1998). Perceived indebtedness: A relational methodological perspective. An unpublished
   Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Psychology, University of Honk Kong.
53.Lincoln, Y. S. (1990). The making of a constructivist: A remembrance of transformations past. In G.
   Guba (Ed.). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
54.Lo, S. & Aryee, S. (2003). Psychological contract breach in a Chinese context: An integrative
   approach. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4): 1005-1020.
55.MacNeil, I. R. (1985). Relational contracts: What we do and do not know. Wisconsin Law Review,
   483-525.
56.McFarlane Shore, L. & Tetrick, L.E. (1994). The psychological contract as an explanatory
   framework in the employment relationship. Trends in Organizational Behavior, 1, 91-109.
57.Millward, L. J. & Hopkins, L. M. (1998). Psychological Contracts, Organizational and Job
   Commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 16, 1530.
58.Mitchell, J. C. (1969). Social networks and urban situations. Manchester University Press.
59.Morrison, D. (1994). Psychological contracts and change. Human Resource Management, 33,
   P.353-372.
60.Park, Seung Ho, & Luo, Yadong. (2001). Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational
   networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 455-477.
61.Peng, S.Q. (1998). Guanxi in trust: An indigenous study of Chinese interpersonal trust.
   Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong.
62.Podolny, Joel M. & James N. Baron. (1997). Relationships and Resources: Social Networks and
   Mobility in the Workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673-693.
63.Pye, L. W. (1982). Chinese commercial negotiating style. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn
   & Hain.
64.Redding, S. G. (1990). The Spirit of Chinese capitalism. New York: deGruyter.
65.Restubog, S. L., Bordia, P., Krebs, S. A., & Tang, R. L. (2005). The role of leader-member exchange
   in the psychological contract breach—subordinates’ performance relationship. 2005 Academy
   of Management Annual Meeting, Honolulu.
66.Rice, R. E. & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity


                                                 36
as a mechanism for social informationn processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 219-244.
67.Robert H. Silin. (1970). Leadership and Values. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
68.Robinson, S. L. & Morrison E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: the effect of
   unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 289-198.
69.Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contracts. Administrative Science
   Quarterly, 41, 574-599.
70.Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and
   violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 525-546.
71.Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M.S. & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the
   psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 137-152.
72.Rousseau, D. M. & Tijoriwala, S. A. (1998). Assessing psychological contracts: Issues, alternatives
   and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 675-695.
73.Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee
   Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121-139.
74.Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New Hire Perceptions of their Own and their Employer's Obligations: A
   study of Psychological Contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, (11), pp.389-400.
75.Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and
   unwritten agreements. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
76.Rousseau, D. M. (2000). Psychological contract inventory technical report.
77.Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological
   contracts. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 511-541.
78.Rousseau, D. M., & Greller, M. M. (1994). Human resource practices: administrative contract
   Makers. Human Resource Management, 33, 385-401.
79.Rousseau, D. M., & Parks, M. J. (1993). The contracts of individuals and organizations. In
   Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 15, 1-47.
80.Rousseau, D. M., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (1994). Linking Strategy and Human Resource Practices:
   How Employee and Customer Contracts are Created. Human Resource Management, 33, 463-489.
81.Schein, E. H. (1980). Organization Psychology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
82.Seibert, R,T., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C.(2001). A social capital theory of career success.
   Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219-2367.
83.Standifird, S. S. & Marshall, R. S. (2000). The transaction cost advantage of guanxi-based business
   practices. Journal of World Business, 35(1), 21-42.
84.Suazo, M. M., Turnley, W. H., & Mai-Dalton, R. R. (2005). Antecedents of psychological contract
   breach: The role of similarity and leader-member exchange. 2005 Academy of Management Annual
   Meeting, Honolulu.
85.Szeto, R. & Wright, P. C. (2006). Business networking in the Chinese context: Its role in the
   formation of guanxi, social capital and ethical foundations. Management Research News, 29(7),
   425-438.
86.Tedeschi, J. T. & Riess, M. (1981). Identities, the phenomenal self, and laboratory research. In J. T.
   Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression maneagement theory and social psychological research. New York:
   Academic Press.
87.Tsang, E. W. K. (1998). Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing
   business in China? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 64-73.
88.Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J. L. (1997). Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and Guanxi in the
   Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24(1), 56-79.
89.Tsui, A. S., Farh, J. L., & Xin, K. P. (2000). Guanxi in the Chinese context. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, &
   E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and Organizations in the Chinese context. London: MacMillan.
90.Tsui, A.S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L.W., & Tripoli, A.M. (1997). Alternative Approaches to the
   Employee-organization Relationship: Does Investment in Employees Pay off? Academy of
   management Journal, (40), pp.1089-1121.
91.Turnley, W. H. & Feldman, D. C. (1998). Psychological contract violations during organizational
   restructuring. Human Resource Management, 37, 71-83.
92.Turnley, W. H. & Feldman, D. C. (1999). A discrepancy model of psychological contract


                                                    37
violations. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 367-386.
93.Turnley, W. H. & Feldman, D. C. (2000). Re-examining the Effects of Psychological Contract
   Violations: Unmet Expectations and Job Dissatisfaction as Mediators. Journal of Organizational
   Behavior, 21, 25-42.
94.Van Dyne, L. & Ang, S. (1998). Organizational citizenship behavior of contingent workers in
   Singapore. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 692-703.
95.Whitley, R. D. (1992). Business System in East Asia. London : Sage.
96.Wong, Y. H. (1998). The dynamics of guanxi in China. Singapore Management Review, 20(2),
   25-42.
97.Xin, K. R. & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional
   support. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6), 1641-1658.
98.Xin, K., Farh, J.L., Cheng, B.S., & Tsui, A.S. (1999). Guanxi and vertical dyads: Evidence from
   Taiwan and the PRC, Paper Presented at the Conference of the Asian Association o fSocial
   Psychology, Taipei, Taiwan.
99.Yan, Y. (1996). The culture of guanxi in a north China village. The China Journal, 35: 1–25.
100.Yang, M. M. (1994). Gifts, favors and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca,
   NY: Cornell University Press.
101.Yeung, I. Y. & Tung, R. L.(1996). Achieving business success in Confucian societies: the
   importance of Guanxi(connections). Organizational Dynamics, 25(2), 54-65.
102.Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.




                                                 38
SWOT        SPACE




       39
4
                2005                       [       ]




                                                       2006
        5
[           ]




                       SPACE




    4
                           932   15
    5
                           345

                                      40
1957
                    1979


       2005                Forbes
2006




 2-1


              2-1




                    41
1957
                                      1964
                            1970
1979
                  1993
                                             1995
                      9924     1999


        2-2
                                       2-1


                      2-2



1957

1964

1970
1972
1975

                  ,
1979


1983


              ,
1984




                               42
,
1985
                                   AUTO CAD

                  ,
1986
                                        ,     CWQC       ,
1987
                                                     ,
              ,
                       ,
                       ,                                     ,
1988




1989


1990
              ,
1991

1992
                               ,

1993

       BVQI                ISO-9002
1994

1995
                      ISO-9002
1997
                              ,
1998

1999

2000
                           ,
2001
          2002


                                   43
2-1
          2002




1.
     1
     2
     3
     4
     5
     6

                 44
7



2.
                                1995
2-3


                                       Faultless
         OEM   ODM

                     2-3




                           45
2-3

C500     C700                 T720       T730




C100     C770                 C800       T120




                     T980




C380     T420                 R510       R850




                     B840




                     8000




             http://www.fuhsing.com.tw


                   46
1.



                2-4


                 2-4




                                           2004
     120   /           05        150-180          /




2.




                                                      43-45%
               35%
     3-4
               2004


                            47
3.

                                       Faultless                     OEM
     ODM


           9                                   2-5
                                                             2001
911                  02




               2-5
               1999       2000         2001          2002    2003
       /                  92.91        93.94         93.29   92.76
               92.97%
       /                  75.22        78.23         77.91   77.54
               64.99%




       2-6                 2000         2005


                                               EPS




                                  48
2-6

                                                               EPS
2000   1561   2480   558   22.49%        267   10.76%   157      1.0
2001   1622   2747   642   23.36%        366   13.31%   535      3.29
2002   1701   2549   565   22.16%        291   11.42%   302      1.78
2003   1753   3042   650   21.38%        359   11.81%   425      2.42
2004   1874   4367   792   21.38%        464   10.63%   511      2.86
2005   1920   4602   611   13.28%        226   4.91%    1311     6.83




                                    49
,




    DIY




     50
OEM   ODM
                           3-1   :


    3-1




,                           ,


                      ,

          51
:

1.

     Schlage Kwikset Weiser Master         ,



2.

     Home Depot Wal-Mart           ,



3.




1.



     3-2

                       3-2


1.                            1.
                                   PRO-E
2.         ANSI-G2
                              2.       CAD/CAM
3.         One-piece




                             52
3-2


4.                                 3.

5.       UL                        4.

6.                                 5.
7.                                 6.

8.                                 7.

9.                                 8.

10.             /         /        9.

11.                                10.
                    EN1154:1997
          ANSI-G1
12.           ANSI-G1

13.



14.




2.
     1




     2                   OEM


                                  53
/



3




        54
SWOT

                                                    6
                    Andrews 1980 [                      ]
                                                                           S strength
           W weakness                                                  O opportunity
             T    threat




                       Andrews                               SWOT
                                           7
4-1               David 1986           [       ]            SWOT



                                 4-1                    SWOT




 6
      Andrews, K. R. (1980). The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Irwin, Homewood.
 7
      David, F. R. (1986). Fundamentals of Strategic Management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

                                                   55
4-1
                 4-2




4-3




            56
1.Home Depot   Wal-Mart        1.

                               2.
2.


                               3.

3.
                               4.

4.
                               5.

                               6.




                          57
S            W
    O   S            W
        O            O



    T   S            W
        T            T       —




1.S-O




2.W-O




3.S-T




                58
4.W-T




       SPACE
         SPACE
      SPACE      The Strategic Position and Action Evaluation
                                                                 8
Rowe, Mason, Dickel, Mann and Mockler 1994                   [       ]
                                                         SPACE
      Financial Strength, FS                        Competitive Advantage, CA
                                                         Environmental Stability,
ES                      Industry Strength, IS
            FS    CA ES        IS
            strategy posture


              SPACE


                                                        Rowe                 SPACE
                                    4-5




  8
      Rowe, Mason, Dickel, Mann and Mockler. (1994). Strategic Management: A
      Methodological Approach(4th), p.259, Massachusedts: Addison-Wesley Puldishing Co.

                                          59
4-5 SPACE


                  FS                                                  ES
1.             (Return on investment)              1.          (Technological changes)
2.             (Leverage)                          2.            (Rate of inflation)
3.        (Liquidity)                              3.            (Demand variability)
4.          /                  (Capital            4.                      (Price range of
   required versus capital available)              5.              (Barriers to entry into
5.          (Cash flow)                            6.          (Competitive pressure/rivalry)
6.                  (Ease of exit from             7.              (Price elasticity of
   market)                                           demand)
7.          (Risk involved in business)            8.            (Pressure from substitute
8.             (Inventory turnover)
9.                          (Use of
   economies of scale and experience)
                   CA                                                IS
1.              (Market share)                     1.         (Growth potential)
2.           (Product quality)                     2.       (Profit potential)
3.                (Product life cycle)             3.            (Financial stability)
4.                (Product replacement cycle)      4.            (Technological know-how)
5.              (Customer loyalty)                 5.         (Resource utilization)
6.                (Competition’s capacity          6.            (Capital intensity)
   utilization)                                    7.                  (Ease of entry into
7.           (Technological know-how)                market)
8.           (Vertical integration)                8.                    (Productivity ,
9.                  (Speed of new-product            capacity
   introductions)                                  9.                  (Manufacturers’
                                                     bargaining
                Rowe, Mason, Dickel, Mann and Mockler. (1994). Strategic Management A
                Methodological Approach(4th), p.259, Massachusedts Addison-Wesley Puldishing
                Co.




           SPACE
          SPACE                             4-1                        FS
     IS                                   +1 +6
                                ES                        CA
     1      6                                                            4-6


                                              60
×
                    FS         CA           ES         IS
        (IS+CA,FS+ES)                    (X,Y)        (X,Y)




                4-1 SPACE


                4-6 SPACE


FS IS    6      5         4          3            2      1
ES CA   -1     -2        -3         -4           -5     -6




                          61
SPACE                                 1               Aggressive
posture




                                                      2
  Competitive posture




                                                      3
  Conservative posture
                                    product competitiveness




                                                                4
           Defensive posture


  competitiveness




    Rowe et al. 1994       SPACE           Porter


                               62
4-2       SPACE                                           Porter




                             R&D                                R&D
                                                                       Porter
                                  acquisition


                                             survival tactics




            4-2 SPACE                             Porter


            Rowe et al. 1994                                            Miles and
                     9
Snow 1978 [              ]                                       Miles and Snow


 9
     Miles, R. and Snow, C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process,
     McGraw-Hill, New York.


                                        63
Rowe et al.   1994
SPACE                             SPACE
   4-7
                 4-7 SPACE



            FS




            IS
        Know-how




                             64
4-7 SPACE



 ES




CA




                    …




SPACE




            SPACE       4-8

            65
4-8              SPACE


         FS
                      1            4     4
                      1            5     5
                     1.5           5    7.5
                     1.5           4     6
FS        22.5÷4 5.625                   22.5
         IS
                      1            4     4
     Know-how
                      1            3     3
                      1            4     4
                      1            2     2
                     1.5           4     6
IS        19÷5 3.8                       19


          ES
                     1.5           -4   -6
                      1            -2   -2
                      1            -3   -3
                      1            -2   -2
                      1            -3   -3
ES        -16÷5   -3.2                   -16
         CA
                     1.5           -2    -3
                      1            -2    -2
                      1            -3    -3
                      1            -2    -2
                      1            -2    -2
                     1.5           -2    -3
                     1.5           -2    -3
                     1.5           -1   -1.5
                      1            -4    -4
CA         -23.5÷9 -2.61                 -23.5




                             66
4-7   SPACE
    FS                  IS                           ES                    CA
                                                     4-8
SPACE                              X          Y
X                   CA+IS          +1.19       -2.31+3.8           Y
    ES+FS      +2.425      -3.2+5.625                                  SPACE
                             4-3




                                        FS
                                             5.625

                                                            (Aggressive)

                                                           1.9 2.425




                    -2.61                                    3.8
         CA                                                            IS




                                             -3.2




                                        ES
                     4-3               SPACE




                                        67
SWOT      SATTY
                                  …




           SPACE




                                      Miles
and Snow




                   Porter


           OEM ODM




                             68
69
70
71
:Stogdill R.M. and Coons,1957




10
     Stogdily, R. M. and Coons, A. E. Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement, Columbus:
     Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research, Monograph No.88., 1957.

                                                72
Peter Drucker




                     2-1




                73
4.4        2-2




                 2-3




      74
Peter Principle




Packard's Law


                     75
A   A   Jim Collins, 2002

          A   A   Good to Great                       Jim
Collins




                                           2003




                                       /     ,2005/11/13




                   2006




                                  76
77
3



                    3

1.   20%

2.   60%

3.   20%




                        60%


                        60%




               78
8




79
100




80
81
82
“   ”




        83
“            ”            5
    5




                 5
                     12




        84
85
...




      86
Raymond A.Noe    2005                                                           -
                                                 11
      P302-303                               [        ]




          Gary C. Wendt




11
                 W. C. Symond, “Basic Training for CEOs.” ,Business Week, June 11, 2001.



                                       87
IBM   Mecrk &
Company



   M A Group Inc.   1999




                     2006        10
     7




                            88
A   A   Good to Great                                        Jim
Collins




                                                      trait theories




                  behavioral theories of Leadership




                                  89
1




                                           Robert R•Blake                  Jane
S•Mouton     1964
                    9
                            2                      1
  9                               8l                           “
 ”       “     ”
                    (1,1)   (1,9)          (9,1)       (5,5)       (9,9)
                                   (9,9)




                             90
F. E. Fiedler
Theory of Contingency




           3



                        91
Hersey              Blanchard
                          Hersey


Hersey                                    4     M1-
                   M2-                    M3-
         M4-




                         92
2006                     2006                   6
                        9
    Viacom                                             CGC
Challenger, Gray & Christmas         2006
                                       1,400    2005     1,322
   2004      663




    Corporate Library
   1,600           CGC


                                            •   Larry Bossidy
           21




   EMBA




                                93
6   EMBA
              2004   1
    CHEERS



         94
Need Hierarchy
Theory
  7




         95
Formal Education        IBM




benchmarks




                          96
mentor




         97

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptxunit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptxBkGupta21
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Mark Simos
 
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxDigital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfGen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfAddepto
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationSlibray Presentation
 
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersGenerative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersRaghuram Pandurangan
 
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii SoldatenkoFwdays
 
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptxThe State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxUse of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Mattias Andersson
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfAlex Barbosa Coqueiro
 
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxA Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanDatabarracks
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenHervé Boutemy
 
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Commit University
 
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your BrandWordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brandgvaughan
 

Recently uploaded (20)

unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptxunit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
unit 4 immunoblotting technique complete.pptx
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
 
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxDigital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfGen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
 
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersGenerative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
 
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
 
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptxThe State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
The State of Passkeys with FIDO Alliance.pptx
 
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxUse of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Use of FIDO in the Payments and Identity Landscape: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
 
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special EditionDMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
 
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxA Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
A Deep Dive on Passkeys: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
 
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
 
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC CataList - Tech Forum 2024
 
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your BrandWordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
 

Featured

2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by HubspotMarius Sescu
 
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPTEverything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPTExpeed Software
 
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsProduct Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsPixeldarts
 
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthHow Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthThinkNow
 
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfAI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfmarketingartwork
 
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024Neil Kimberley
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)contently
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024Albert Qian
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsKurio // The Social Media Age(ncy)
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Search Engine Journal
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summarySpeakerHub
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Tessa Mero
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentLily Ray
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best PracticesVit Horky
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementMindGenius
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...RachelPearson36
 

Featured (20)

2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
 
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPTEverything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
 
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsProduct Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
 
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthHow Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
 
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfAI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
 
Skeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture CodeSkeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture Code
 
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
 
How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations
 
Introduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data ScienceIntroduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data Science
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project management
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
 

Guanxi psychological contract: A review of the literature

  • 1. Guanxi psychological contract
  • 3. 1960 Argyris 1960 psychological work contract Argyris 1960 foreman …. Guanxi 1992 Jacobs, 1979 1948 2000 Janssens, Sels & Brande, 2003 Herriot 2001 2
  • 4. Rousseau 1995 2001 1. 2. 3. 4. 3
  • 5. Guanxi 2000 social tie interpersonal connections Xin & Pearce, 1996 1982 1999 1997 1998 social capital social exchange Butterfield, 1983 Pye, 1982 1988 objective guanxi subjective guanxi 1996 Guanxi base . 4
  • 6. Jacob, 1979 1992 Farth, Earley, & Lin, 1997; Farth, Tsui, Xin, & Cheng, 1998; Ho, 1998; Jacob, 1979; Yang, 1994; Tsui & Farh, 1997; Tsui, Farh, & Xin, 2000 2007 1999 ... 1997 2000 Farh et al., 1998 identity Dunfee & Warren, 2001 1995 1996 Kiong & Kee, 1998 1999 1988 5
  • 7. 1989 1999 non-job related Chan, 1995; Chang and Holt, 1991; Yan, 1996; Yang, 1994 1988 1993 Foa & Foa, 1976 1989 1999 1981 1988 1996 1988 Tedeschi & Riess, 1981 1988 6
  • 8. 1993 2008 Park & Luo, 2001 Standifird & Marshall, 2000 1993 Chan, 1995; Chang & Holt, 1991; Chen & Peng, 2008; Yan, 1996; Yang, 1994 Park & Luo, 2001 2002 Schein 1980 mutuality Davis and Newstrom 1989 Rousseau 1989 belief Rousseau perception 7
  • 9. Levinson, Price, Munder, Mandl and Solley 1962 Morrison 1994 Levinson predictability interdependence psychological distance changeable crisis management Rousseau 1995 1 2 3 4 2004 1 2 promise Rousseau & Parks, 1993 3 individual perception Rousseau & Tijoriwala, 1998 1 2 1999 3 4 5 6 … Robinson, Kraatz, & Rousseau, 1994 MacNeil 1985 transactional contract relational contract Rousseau and Parks 1993 8
  • 10. organiztion-specific skills mutual adjustment 2002 Rousseau 1995 Rousseau and Wade-Benzoni 1994 Rousseau 1995 Tsui, Pearce, Porter, and Tripoli 1997 Hui, Lee, and Rousseau 2004 Hui, Lee, & Rousseau, 2004; Rousseau, 1995 Rousseau 2000 hybrid contract transitional contract ( ) 9
  • 11. 2004 MacNeil 1985 Rousseau 1995 Rousseau 1995 Tsui et al. 1997 Rousseau, 2000 social network informal networks social identity attitudes perceptions behaviors Ho & Levesque, 2005; Rice & Aydin, 1991 Burt, 1992; Ibarra, 1995; Podolny & Baron, 1997 Van Dyne and Ang 1998 Ho, Rousseau, and Levesque 2006 Mitchell, 1969 emic perspective Yeung & Tung, 10
  • 12. 1996 place security trust prescribed role Hammond & Glenn, 2004 1988 1993 Yan, 1996 Chan, Cheng, & Szeto, 2002; Yang, 1994 employment relationship Coyle-Shapiro & Conway 2005 Blau, 1964 MacNeil 1985 Blau 1964 Robinson, Kraatz, & Rousseau, 1994 Millward, 1998 11
  • 13. Chen & Peng, 2008 1994 1989 1990 1991 1988 1985 1999 2002 Chan, 1995; Chang & Holt, 1991; Chen & Peng, 2008; Yan, 1996; Yang, 1994 Park & Luo, 2002 2002 MacNeil, 1985; Rousseau, 1995; Rousseau & Parks, 1993 2004 Robinson & Morrison, 1995; Rousseau, 1995 Hui, Lee, & Rousseau, 2004; Rousseau, 1995; Rousseau & Wade-Benzoni, 1994; Tsui, Pearce, Porter, & Tripoli, 1997 Rousseau, 2000 1988 12
  • 14. 3-1 3-1 1-1 1-2 1 [ ] 1 13
  • 15. 2007 2008 1 2 3 1 2 3 3-1 3-1 1988 1999 2007 3 5 3 3 3 3 6 20 Likert 1 2 3 4 5 3-2 14
  • 16. 3-2 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ( ) 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Rousseau 1989 belief 2004 15
  • 17. 1 1 11 11 2 12 15 4 15 Likert 1 2 3 4 5 6 3-3 3-3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 105 95 92 87.6% 1. 16
  • 18. 7 8 14 18 3-4 3-4 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 2. 6 7 11 3-5 17
  • 19. 3-5 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 97 10 7 97 11 22 670 482 71.9% 44 438 65.3 3-6 18
  • 20. 3-6 % 670 100.0 188 28.1 482 71.9 438 90.9 44 9.1 65.3% 3-7 246 56.16% 192 43.84% 26 34 279 63.7 25 87 19.86 35 72 16.44 264 60.27 138 31.51 36 8.22 216 49.32 189 43.15 33 7.53 7 3 4 19
  • 21. 41.16 4 1 141 32.19 13 126 28.77 35 75 17.12 5 96 21.91 79.43 4 3 141 32.19 37 147 33.56 7 11 96 21.92 11 54 12.32 3-7 N=438 % 192 43.84 246 56.16 25 87 19.86 30.25 26 34 279 63.7 35 72 16.44 36 8.22 264 60.27 138 31.51 189 43.15 33 7.53 216 49.32 1 141 32.19 13 126 28.77 41.16 35 75 17.12 5 96 21.91 3 141 32.19 37 147 33.56 79.43 7 11 96 21.92 11 54 12.32 20
  • 22. 3-2 3-2 1-1 1-1a 1-1b 1-2 1-2a 21
  • 23. 4-1 4.23 0.47 4.05 0.42 3.95 0.52 3.72 0.52 3.70 0.56 3 4-1 4.03 0.91 3.97 1.06 3.66 1.09 3.5 4-1 P 0.05 P 0.01 22
  • 24. 4-1 N 438 3.95 0.52 0.118* 0.186** -0.081 0.278** 0.142** 0.247** 0.259** 4.05 0.42 0.305** 0.183** 0.370** 0.139** 0.109* 0.170** 3.70 0.56 0.210** 0.275** 0.099* 0.193** 0.054 3.72 0.52 0.189** 0.145** 0.017 0.054 4.23 0.47 -0.054 0.050 -0.023 4.03 0.91 0.641** 0.601** 3.97 1.06 0.520** 3.66 1.09 * P 0.05 ** P 0.01 2 [ ] 4-2 P 0.05 4-2 N 438 t 0.569 3.97 0.587 3.94 0.478 1.269 4.09 0.423 4.04 0.427 2.119* 3.77 0.531 3.65 0.590 -1.424 3.68 0.560 3.75 0.502 -1.535 4.20 0.497 4.27 0.459 -0.306 4.02 0.883 4.05 0.937 4.04 0.993 3.93 1.112 1.124 3.69 1.106 3.64 1.086 0.485 * P 0.05 2 23
  • 25. 25 26 34 35 4-3 ANOVA P 3 0.05 P 0.01 Scheffe`s method [ ] 4-3 N 438 F Scheffe 25 a 26 34 b 35 c 3.98 3.98 3.83 2.411 0.53 0.52 0.53 4.15 4.07 3.96 * 3.191 0.39 0.42 0.42 3.96 3.71 3.53 ** a bacbc 9.000 0.51 0.58 0.44 3.77 3.77 3.49 ** a c bc 9.375 0.26 0.52 0.59 4.12 4.26 4.22 1.744 0.51 0.46 0.50 4.13 4.09 3.76 ** bc 4.440 0.78 0.85 1.13 4.08 4.08 3.50 9.982** a c bc 0.82 1.01 1.27 3.70 3.72 3.40 2.682 1.19 0.99 1.35 * P 0.05 ** P 0.01 3 24
  • 26. 4-4 4-4 N 438 F Scheffe a b c 3.64 3.95 4.03 ** a bac 8.040 0.57 0.50 0.53 3.86 4.07 4.09 * a bac 4.380 0.52 0.40 0.42 3.31 3.77 3.67 ** a bac 11.319 0.63 0.52 0.58 3.60 3.74 3.72 1.030 0.63 0.48 0.57 4.28 4.22 4.27 0.683 0.56 0.47 0.45 3.61 4.01 4.20 ** a c 6.281 1.06 0.94 0.75 3.25 3.98 4.16 ** a bac 10.960 1.38 1.05 0.89 3.52 3.62 3.78 1.341 1.57 1.10 0.89 * P 0.05 ** P 0.01 4-5 25
  • 27. P 0.01 4-5 N 438 F Scheffe a b c 3.92 3.61 4.03 a bbc 10.331** 0.55 0.51 0.48 4.07 4.12 4.04 0.581 0.45 0.26 0.42 3.72 3.88 3.66 2.377 0.59 0.56 0.54 3.67 4.02 3.72 a bbc 6.392** 0.59 0.36 0.47 4.31 4.03 4.21 a b 5.640** 0.54 0.46 0.40 3.89 4.63 4.06 a bbc 9.772** 0.98 0.86 0.81 4.02 3.91 3.95 0.305 1.20 1.00 0.93 3.48 4.00 3.77 a bac 5.553** 1.26 0.74 0.94 * P 0.05 ** P 0.01 1 13 35 5 4-6 26
  • 28. 13 4-6 N 438 F Scheffe 1 a 13 b 35 c 5 d 4.02 3.86 3.99 3.95 2.291 0.56 0.55 0.44 0.48 4.11 4.13 4.01 3.93 a d 5.362** 0.39 0.43 0.38 0.46 b d 3.72 3.75 3.80 3.53 b d 4.052** 0.57 0.62 0.52 0.45 c d 3.70 3.88 3.65 3.60 b c 5.904** 0.45 0.50 0.61 0.55 b d 4.26 4.27 4.25 4.15 1.538 0.46 0.49 0.51 0.42 4.06 4.03 4.14 3.91 0.908 0.85 0.99 0.84 0.92 4.04 3.88 4.05 3.95 0.675 1.18 1.17 0.96 0.73 3.56 3.63 3.70 3.82 1.113 1.20 1.17 1.03 0.82 * P 0.05 ** P 0.01 3 37 7 11 11 4-7 P 0.05 P 0.01 11 27
  • 29. 4-7 N 438 3.92 3.99 3.98 3.87 0.56 0.49 0.50 0.57 4.15 4.05 3.97 4.02 0.43 0.39 0.43 0.44 3.77 3.75 3.70 3.41 0.55 0.53 0.60 0.54 3.74 3.75 3.83 3.40 0.43 0.55 0.45 0.68 4.22 4.22 4.25 4.31 0.47 0.49 0.44 0.50 4.14 4.10 4.01 3.61 0.86 0.78 0.93 1.18 4.14 3.96 4.07 3.43 1.12 0.86 1.00 1.30 3.60 3.78 3.65 3.54 1.19 0.81 1.15 1.36 * P 0.05 ** P 0.01 mutiple regression 4-1 4-8 F 5.559 P 0.001 28
  • 30. P 0.05 R2 Adjusted R2 R2 0.037 3.7% 3.7% F 13.405 P 0.001 R2 0.085 8.5% 8.5% 4-8 0.121* 0.216*** 0.112* 0.041 0.140** 0.043 5.559*** 13.405*** F R2 0.037 0.085 Adjusted R2 0.030 0.078 * P 0.05 ** P 0.01 *** P 0.001 4-9 VIF F 0.409 29
  • 31. 4-9 0.038 -0.030 F 0.409 R2 0.002 Adjusted R2 -0.003 * P 0.05 ** P 0.01 *** P 0.001 4-10 4-10 1-1a 1-1b 1-2a 30
  • 32. Guanxi 2007 2008 31
  • 33. 1. 2003 2. 2004 3. 2000 4. 1988 239-288 5. 1993 : 6. 1999 30 7-10 7. 2006 - 3 25-48 8. 1989 95-112 9. 1994 10. 1989 213-239 11. 2000 SPSS 12. 2000 13. 1997 14. 2005 23 201-257 15. 2002 16. 2002 18 175-226 17. 2003 18. 2007 21 19. 2007 Guanxi 26 1 47-70 20. 2002 21. 1980 22. 1981 23. 1992 12 143-157 24. 2008 - 25. 1949 57-84 32
  • 34. 26. 1999 12 261-288 27. 1997 7 282-338 28. 1988 5 155-238 29. 1990 28 47-64 30. 1994 31. 1991 32 219-232 32. 2005 33. 2001 10 4 101-128 34. 2004 — 11 2 1-32 35. 2000 36. 1982 345-360 37. 2000 38. 1999 12 291-312 39. 2001 181-198 40. 1948 41. 1988 7-43 42. 2000 181-208 43. 2002 44. 2002 — 21 4 101-127 45. 2006 Guanxi 46. 1997 47. 1998 48. 1999 12 105-179 49. 2001 50. 2000 13 277-316 51. 2005 52. 1993 53. 2002 229-255 54. 1996 55. 1993 33
  • 35. 1992 56. 1998 57. 2007 — 58. 1996 59. 2000 60. 1997 39 1 75-92 61. 1995 4 2-41 62. 2001 43 2 207 63. 2005 64. 2000 65. 2003 1. Alan. P. Fiske. (1991). Structures of Social Life: The four Elementary forms of Human Relations. New York: The Free Press. 2. Alston, J. P. (1989). Wa, guanxi, and inhwa: Managerial principles in Japan, China, and Korea. Business Horizons, 32(2), 26-31. 3. Ang, S. H., & Leong, S. M. (2000). Out of the months of babes: Business ethics and youths in Asia. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(2), 129-144. 4. Argyris, C. P. (1960). Understanding Organizational Behavior. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press. 5. Armstrong, R. W., & Seng, T. B. (2000). Corporate-customer satisfaction in the banking industry of Singapore. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18(3), 97-111. 6. Barnard,C.I. (1938). The Functions of the Executive.Cambridge,Mass: Harvard University Press. 7. Bian, Yanjie. (1997). Bringing Strong Ties Back In: Indirect Connection, Bridges and Job Search in China. American Sociological Review, 62. 8. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 9. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, M.A. Harvard University Press. 10.Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365. 11.Butterfield, R. A. (1983). The development and use of culturally appropriate curriculum for American Indian students. Peabody Journal of Education, 61, 50-66. 12.Cavanaugh, M. A. & Noe, R. A. (1999). Antecedents and consequences of relational components of the new psychological contract. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20: 323-340. 13.Chan, M. L. (1995). Jiaoji, Jiaoqing and enterprise management. Thoughts and Speech, 33(3): 261–293. (In Chinese.) 14.Chan, R. Y. K., Cheng, L. T. W., & Szeto, R. W. F. (2002). The dynamics of guanxi and ethics for Chinese executives. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(4), 327-336. 34
  • 36. 15.Chang, H. C., & Holt, G. R. (1991). The concept of yuan and Chinese interpersonal relationship. In S. Ting-Toomey & F. Korzenny(Eds.), Cross-culture 16.Chen, X.-P., & Peng, S. (2008). Guanxi dynamics: Shifts in the closeness of ties between chinese coworkers. Management and Organization Review, 4(1):63-80. 17.Chung, W.K. & Hamilton, G.G. (2001). Social Logic as Business Logic: Guanxi, Trustworthiness, and the Embeddedness of Chinese Business Practices. Applebaum RP et al (Eds). Rules and Networks: The Legal Culture of Global Business Transaction, Oxford, Hart Publications, pp325-346. 18.Coyle-Shapiro, J. & Conway, N. (2005). Exchange relationships: An examination of psychological contracts and perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 4, 774-781. 19.Coyle-Shapiro, J. & Kessler, I. (2000). Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: A large scale survey. Journal of Management Studies, 37(7), 903-930. 20.Coyle-Shapiro, J. & Kessler, I. (2002). Contingent and non-contingent working in local government: Contrasting psychological contracts. Public Administration, 80: 77-101. 21.Coyle-Shapiro, J. & Kessler, I. (2003). The employment relationship in the UK public sector: A psychological contract perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 213-230. 22.Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334. 23.Davis, K. & Newstrom, J. W. (1989). Human Behavior at Work: Organizational Behavior, 8th ED., McGraw Hill. 24.Dunfee, T. W., & Warren, D. E. (2001). Is guanxi ethical? A normative analysis of doing business in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3), 191-204. 25.Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal Of Applied Psychology, Vol.71, No.3, pp.500-507. 26.Fan, Y. (2002a). Guanxi's consequences: Personal gains at social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(4), 371-380. 27.Fan, Y. (2002b). Questioning guanxi: Definition, classification and implications. International Business Review, 11(5), 543-561. 28.Farh, J., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B. (1998). The influence of relational demography and Guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4), 471-488. 29.Farth, J. L., Earley, P.C., Lin, S.C. (1997). Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.42, pp.421-444. 30.Foa, E. & Foa, V. (1976). Resource Theory Social Exchange, In J. Thibaut, J. Spence & R. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary Trends in Social Psychology, Morristown, N. J.: General Learning Press. 31.Granovetter, Mark. (1990). The Old and the New Economic Sociology: A history and an Agenda. Pp. 89-112, in Beyond the Marketplace: Rethinking Economy and Society, edited by Roger Friedland and A. F. Robertson. New York: Aldine deGruyter. 32.Guest, D. E. & Conway, N. (2002). Communicating the Psychological Contract: an Employer Perspective. Human Resource Management Journal, (12), pp.22-38. 33.Guzzo, R. A., Noonan, K. A., & Elorn, E. (1994). Expatriate managers and psychological contract. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4): 617-626. 34.Hammond, S. C., & Glenn, L. M. (2004). The ancient practice of Chinese social networking: Guanxi and social network theory. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 6(1/2), 24-31. 35.Herriot, P. (2001). The employment relationship: a psychological perspective. London: Routledge. 36.Ho, D. Y. F. 1998 . Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance An analysis based on methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 1-16. 37.Ho, V. T. & Levesque, L. L. (2005). With a little help from my friend (and substitutes): Social referents and influence in psychological contract fulfillment. Organiztion Science, 16, 275-289. 38.Ho, V. T., Rousseau, D. M., & Levesque, L. L. (2006). Social networks and the psychological contract: Structural holes, cohesive ties, and beliefs regarding employer obligations. Human Relations, 59, 4, 459-481. 39.Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, New York: Harcourt Brace and 35
  • 37. World. 40.Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Psychological homeostasis and jen: Conceptual tools for advancing psychological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 73, 23-44. 41.Hui, C., Lee, C., & Rousseau, D.M. (2004). Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 311-321. 42.Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, Opportunity and Diversity of Social Circles in Managerial Managers' Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 673-703. 43.Jacobs, J. B. (1979). A preliminary model of particularistic ties in Chinese political alliances: Kan-ch’ing and kuan-hsi in a rural Taiwanese township. The China Quarterly, 77, 237-273. 44.Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second-generation Little Jiffy. Psychological, 35, 401-415. 45.Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research, International Ed. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. 46.Kiong, T. C., & Kee, Y. P. (1998). Guanxi bases, Xinyong and Chinese Business. British Journal of Sociology, 49(1), 75-96. 47.Lee, D. J., Pae, J. H., & Wong, Y. H. (2001). A model of close business relationship in China (guanxi). European Journal of Marketing, 35(1/2), 51-69. 48.Lester, S. W., Claire, E., & Kickul, J. (2001). Psychological contracts in the 21st century: What Employees value most and how well organizations are responding to these expectations. Humman resource planning,Vol.24 ,No.1, p.10-21. 49.Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and Organization. Administrative Scuence Quarterly.Vol.9, No.4, pp.370-390. 50.Levinson, H., Price, C., Munder, K., Mandl, H., & Solley, C. (1962). Men, Management and Mental Health. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 51.Lewis-McClear, K., & Taylor, M. S. (1997). Not seeing eye-to-ete:implications of discrepant psychological contracts and contract violation for the employment relationship. Academy Of Management Proceedings, p.335-340. 52.Li, F. (1998). Perceived indebtedness: A relational methodological perspective. An unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Psychology, University of Honk Kong. 53.Lincoln, Y. S. (1990). The making of a constructivist: A remembrance of transformations past. In G. Guba (Ed.). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. 54.Lo, S. & Aryee, S. (2003). Psychological contract breach in a Chinese context: An integrative approach. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4): 1005-1020. 55.MacNeil, I. R. (1985). Relational contracts: What we do and do not know. Wisconsin Law Review, 483-525. 56.McFarlane Shore, L. & Tetrick, L.E. (1994). The psychological contract as an explanatory framework in the employment relationship. Trends in Organizational Behavior, 1, 91-109. 57.Millward, L. J. & Hopkins, L. M. (1998). Psychological Contracts, Organizational and Job Commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 16, 1530. 58.Mitchell, J. C. (1969). Social networks and urban situations. Manchester University Press. 59.Morrison, D. (1994). Psychological contracts and change. Human Resource Management, 33, P.353-372. 60.Park, Seung Ho, & Luo, Yadong. (2001). Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 455-477. 61.Peng, S.Q. (1998). Guanxi in trust: An indigenous study of Chinese interpersonal trust. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong. 62.Podolny, Joel M. & James N. Baron. (1997). Relationships and Resources: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace. American Sociological Review, 62, 673-693. 63.Pye, L. W. (1982). Chinese commercial negotiating style. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain. 64.Redding, S. G. (1990). The Spirit of Chinese capitalism. New York: deGruyter. 65.Restubog, S. L., Bordia, P., Krebs, S. A., & Tang, R. L. (2005). The role of leader-member exchange in the psychological contract breach—subordinates’ performance relationship. 2005 Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Honolulu. 66.Rice, R. E. & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity 36
  • 38. as a mechanism for social informationn processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 219-244. 67.Robert H. Silin. (1970). Leadership and Values. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 68.Robinson, S. L. & Morrison E. W. (1995). Psychological contracts and OCB: the effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 289-198. 69.Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contracts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574-599. 70.Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. (2000). The development of psychological contract breach and violation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 525-546. 71.Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M.S. & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 137-152. 72.Rousseau, D. M. & Tijoriwala, S. A. (1998). Assessing psychological contracts: Issues, alternatives and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 675-695. 73.Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121-139. 74.Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New Hire Perceptions of their Own and their Employer's Obligations: A study of Psychological Contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, (11), pp.389-400. 75.Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 76.Rousseau, D. M. (2000). Psychological contract inventory technical report. 77.Rousseau, D. M. (2001). Schema, promise and mutuality: The building blocks of the psychological contracts. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 511-541. 78.Rousseau, D. M., & Greller, M. M. (1994). Human resource practices: administrative contract Makers. Human Resource Management, 33, 385-401. 79.Rousseau, D. M., & Parks, M. J. (1993). The contracts of individuals and organizations. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 15, 1-47. 80.Rousseau, D. M., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (1994). Linking Strategy and Human Resource Practices: How Employee and Customer Contracts are Created. Human Resource Management, 33, 463-489. 81.Schein, E. H. (1980). Organization Psychology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 82.Seibert, R,T., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C.(2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 219-2367. 83.Standifird, S. S. & Marshall, R. S. (2000). The transaction cost advantage of guanxi-based business practices. Journal of World Business, 35(1), 21-42. 84.Suazo, M. M., Turnley, W. H., & Mai-Dalton, R. R. (2005). Antecedents of psychological contract breach: The role of similarity and leader-member exchange. 2005 Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Honolulu. 85.Szeto, R. & Wright, P. C. (2006). Business networking in the Chinese context: Its role in the formation of guanxi, social capital and ethical foundations. Management Research News, 29(7), 425-438. 86.Tedeschi, J. T. & Riess, M. (1981). Identities, the phenomenal self, and laboratory research. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression maneagement theory and social psychological research. New York: Academic Press. 87.Tsang, E. W. K. (1998). Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 64-73. 88.Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J. L. (1997). Where guanxi matters: Relational demography and Guanxi in the Chinese context. Work and Occupations, 24(1), 56-79. 89.Tsui, A. S., Farh, J. L., & Xin, K. P. (2000). Guanxi in the Chinese context. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and Organizations in the Chinese context. London: MacMillan. 90.Tsui, A.S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L.W., & Tripoli, A.M. (1997). Alternative Approaches to the Employee-organization Relationship: Does Investment in Employees Pay off? Academy of management Journal, (40), pp.1089-1121. 91.Turnley, W. H. & Feldman, D. C. (1998). Psychological contract violations during organizational restructuring. Human Resource Management, 37, 71-83. 92.Turnley, W. H. & Feldman, D. C. (1999). A discrepancy model of psychological contract 37
  • 39. violations. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 367-386. 93.Turnley, W. H. & Feldman, D. C. (2000). Re-examining the Effects of Psychological Contract Violations: Unmet Expectations and Job Dissatisfaction as Mediators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 25-42. 94.Van Dyne, L. & Ang, S. (1998). Organizational citizenship behavior of contingent workers in Singapore. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 692-703. 95.Whitley, R. D. (1992). Business System in East Asia. London : Sage. 96.Wong, Y. H. (1998). The dynamics of guanxi in China. Singapore Management Review, 20(2), 25-42. 97.Xin, K. R. & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6), 1641-1658. 98.Xin, K., Farh, J.L., Cheng, B.S., & Tsui, A.S. (1999). Guanxi and vertical dyads: Evidence from Taiwan and the PRC, Paper Presented at the Conference of the Asian Association o fSocial Psychology, Taipei, Taiwan. 99.Yan, Y. (1996). The culture of guanxi in a north China village. The China Journal, 35: 1–25. 100.Yang, M. M. (1994). Gifts, favors and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 101.Yeung, I. Y. & Tung, R. L.(1996). Achieving business success in Confucian societies: the importance of Guanxi(connections). Organizational Dynamics, 25(2), 54-65. 102.Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall. 38
  • 40. SWOT SPACE 39
  • 41. 4 2005 [ ] 2006 5 [ ] SPACE 4 932 15 5 345 40
  • 42. 1957 1979 2005 Forbes 2006 2-1 2-1 41
  • 43. 1957 1964 1970 1979 1993 1995 9924 1999 2-2 2-1 2-2 1957 1964 1970 1972 1975 , 1979 1983 , 1984 42
  • 44. , 1985 AUTO CAD , 1986 , CWQC , 1987 , , , , , 1988 1989 1990 , 1991 1992 , 1993 BVQI ISO-9002 1994 1995 ISO-9002 1997 , 1998 1999 2000 , 2001 2002 43
  • 45. 2-1 2002 1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 44
  • 46. 7 2. 1995 2-3 Faultless OEM ODM 2-3 45
  • 47. 2-3 C500 C700 T720 T730 C100 C770 C800 T120 T980 C380 T420 R510 R850 B840 8000 http://www.fuhsing.com.tw 46
  • 48. 1. 2-4 2-4 2004 120 / 05 150-180 / 2. 43-45% 35% 3-4 2004 47
  • 49. 3. Faultless OEM ODM 9 2-5 2001 911 02 2-5 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 / 92.91 93.94 93.29 92.76 92.97% / 75.22 78.23 77.91 77.54 64.99% 2-6 2000 2005 EPS 48
  • 50. 2-6 EPS 2000 1561 2480 558 22.49% 267 10.76% 157 1.0 2001 1622 2747 642 23.36% 366 13.31% 535 3.29 2002 1701 2549 565 22.16% 291 11.42% 302 1.78 2003 1753 3042 650 21.38% 359 11.81% 425 2.42 2004 1874 4367 792 21.38% 464 10.63% 511 2.86 2005 1920 4602 611 13.28% 226 4.91% 1311 6.83 49
  • 51. , DIY 50
  • 52. OEM ODM 3-1 : 3-1 , , , 51
  • 53. : 1. Schlage Kwikset Weiser Master , 2. Home Depot Wal-Mart , 3. 1. 3-2 3-2 1. 1. PRO-E 2. ANSI-G2 2. CAD/CAM 3. One-piece 52
  • 54. 3-2 4. 3. 5. UL 4. 6. 5. 7. 6. 8. 7. 9. 8. 10. / / 9. 11. 10. EN1154:1997 ANSI-G1 12. ANSI-G1 13. 14. 2. 1 2 OEM 53
  • 55. / 3 54
  • 56. SWOT 6 Andrews 1980 [ ] S strength W weakness O opportunity T threat Andrews SWOT 7 4-1 David 1986 [ ] SWOT 4-1 SWOT 6 Andrews, K. R. (1980). The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Irwin, Homewood. 7 David, F. R. (1986). Fundamentals of Strategic Management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. 55
  • 57. 4-1 4-2 4-3 56
  • 58. 1.Home Depot Wal-Mart 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 6. 57
  • 59. S W O S W O O T S W T T — 1.S-O 2.W-O 3.S-T 58
  • 60. 4.W-T SPACE SPACE SPACE The Strategic Position and Action Evaluation 8 Rowe, Mason, Dickel, Mann and Mockler 1994 [ ] SPACE Financial Strength, FS Competitive Advantage, CA Environmental Stability, ES Industry Strength, IS FS CA ES IS strategy posture SPACE Rowe SPACE 4-5 8 Rowe, Mason, Dickel, Mann and Mockler. (1994). Strategic Management: A Methodological Approach(4th), p.259, Massachusedts: Addison-Wesley Puldishing Co. 59
  • 61. 4-5 SPACE FS ES 1. (Return on investment) 1. (Technological changes) 2. (Leverage) 2. (Rate of inflation) 3. (Liquidity) 3. (Demand variability) 4. / (Capital 4. (Price range of required versus capital available) 5. (Barriers to entry into 5. (Cash flow) 6. (Competitive pressure/rivalry) 6. (Ease of exit from 7. (Price elasticity of market) demand) 7. (Risk involved in business) 8. (Pressure from substitute 8. (Inventory turnover) 9. (Use of economies of scale and experience) CA IS 1. (Market share) 1. (Growth potential) 2. (Product quality) 2. (Profit potential) 3. (Product life cycle) 3. (Financial stability) 4. (Product replacement cycle) 4. (Technological know-how) 5. (Customer loyalty) 5. (Resource utilization) 6. (Competition’s capacity 6. (Capital intensity) utilization) 7. (Ease of entry into 7. (Technological know-how) market) 8. (Vertical integration) 8. (Productivity , 9. (Speed of new-product capacity introductions) 9. (Manufacturers’ bargaining Rowe, Mason, Dickel, Mann and Mockler. (1994). Strategic Management A Methodological Approach(4th), p.259, Massachusedts Addison-Wesley Puldishing Co. SPACE SPACE 4-1 FS IS +1 +6 ES CA 1 6 4-6 60
  • 62. × FS CA ES IS (IS+CA,FS+ES) (X,Y) (X,Y) 4-1 SPACE 4-6 SPACE FS IS 6 5 4 3 2 1 ES CA -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 61
  • 63. SPACE 1 Aggressive posture 2 Competitive posture 3 Conservative posture product competitiveness 4 Defensive posture competitiveness Rowe et al. 1994 SPACE Porter 62
  • 64. 4-2 SPACE Porter R&D R&D Porter acquisition survival tactics 4-2 SPACE Porter Rowe et al. 1994 Miles and 9 Snow 1978 [ ] Miles and Snow 9 Miles, R. and Snow, C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, McGraw-Hill, New York. 63
  • 65. Rowe et al. 1994 SPACE SPACE 4-7 4-7 SPACE FS IS Know-how 64
  • 66. 4-7 SPACE ES CA … SPACE SPACE 4-8 65
  • 67. 4-8 SPACE FS 1 4 4 1 5 5 1.5 5 7.5 1.5 4 6 FS 22.5÷4 5.625 22.5 IS 1 4 4 Know-how 1 3 3 1 4 4 1 2 2 1.5 4 6 IS 19÷5 3.8 19 ES 1.5 -4 -6 1 -2 -2 1 -3 -3 1 -2 -2 1 -3 -3 ES -16÷5 -3.2 -16 CA 1.5 -2 -3 1 -2 -2 1 -3 -3 1 -2 -2 1 -2 -2 1.5 -2 -3 1.5 -2 -3 1.5 -1 -1.5 1 -4 -4 CA -23.5÷9 -2.61 -23.5 66
  • 68. 4-7 SPACE FS IS ES CA 4-8 SPACE X Y X CA+IS +1.19 -2.31+3.8 Y ES+FS +2.425 -3.2+5.625 SPACE 4-3 FS 5.625 (Aggressive) 1.9 2.425 -2.61 3.8 CA IS -3.2 ES 4-3 SPACE 67
  • 69. SWOT SATTY … SPACE Miles and Snow Porter OEM ODM 68
  • 70. 69
  • 71. 70
  • 72. 71
  • 73. :Stogdill R.M. and Coons,1957 10 Stogdily, R. M. and Coons, A. E. Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement, Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research, Monograph No.88., 1957. 72
  • 74. Peter Drucker 2-1 73
  • 75. 4.4 2-2 2-3 74
  • 77. A A Jim Collins, 2002 A A Good to Great Jim Collins 2003 / ,2005/11/13 2006 76
  • 78. 77
  • 79. 3 3 1. 20% 2. 60% 3. 20% 60% 60% 78
  • 80. 8 79
  • 82. 81
  • 83. 82
  • 84. ” 83
  • 85. ” 5 5 5 12 84
  • 86. 85
  • 87. ... 86
  • 88. Raymond A.Noe 2005 - 11 P302-303 [ ] Gary C. Wendt 11 W. C. Symond, “Basic Training for CEOs.” ,Business Week, June 11, 2001. 87
  • 89. IBM Mecrk & Company M A Group Inc. 1999 2006 10 7 88
  • 90. A A Good to Great Jim Collins trait theories behavioral theories of Leadership 89
  • 91. 1 Robert R•Blake Jane S•Mouton 1964 9 2 1 9 8l “ ” “ ” (1,1) (1,9) (9,1) (5,5) (9,9) (9,9) 90
  • 92. F. E. Fiedler Theory of Contingency 3 91
  • 93. Hersey Blanchard Hersey Hersey 4 M1- M2- M3- M4- 92
  • 94. 2006 2006 6 9 Viacom CGC Challenger, Gray & Christmas 2006 1,400 2005 1,322 2004 663 Corporate Library 1,600 CGC • Larry Bossidy 21 EMBA 93
  • 95. 6 EMBA 2004 1 CHEERS 94
  • 97. Formal Education IBM benchmarks 96
  • 98. mentor 97