SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 8
Republic of the Philippines
                                                                Laguna State Polytechnic University
                                                                     San Pablo City Campus
                                                                          San Pablo City


                                                                     EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

             Title: RELATED FACTORS AND ENGLISH PROFICIENCY OF FIRST YEAR STUDENTS AT PRUDENCIA D. FULE MEMORIAL
                                         NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC YEAR 2011 – 2012


Rationale:

       Public Secondary Institutions seek to produce highly skilled and competitive students, discover and enhance different aptitudes and interest in order to equip
them with skills for productive endeavour and interactive communication. That is why one of the very important is that the secondary students would be proficient
in English language not just on how they convey ideas and thoughts but rather to perpetuate in a proper intellectual exchanges. Hence, this study aims to find out
and address the factor that affects the English proficiency of the first year students who are enrolled in Prudencia D. Fule Memorial National High School during the
academic year 2011-2012.

Significance of the Study


       The study will be significant to the following:
Teachers and Instructors. The findings and implications of this study will give them ability in making English subjects more effectual teachers especially for those
specializing English, for it will benefit them in a way of identifying the factors underlying English proficiency;
Students. For it will help them to improve and be competent in using the second language;
Parents. To furnish and give aid for their children an interest to learn the complexities of English language; and
Researchers, for it will help them gain satisfaction for knowing some insights about the given problem and develop research skills to be more productive in the
field that they had chosen to belong in the future profession.
Statement of the Problem             Hypotheses     Statistical Treatment      Findings & Conclusions          Recommendations

        The aim of the study is to find                                                                                Based on the findings
out the factor that affects the English                                                                         and conclusions made in the
proficiency of the first year students                                                                          study,     the    following
who are enrolled in Prudencia                                                                                   recommendations are hereby
National High School during the                                                                                 presented:
academic year 2011-2012.

       Specifically, the study sought
to answer the following questions:


       1. What is the profile of the
          respondents in terms of:

           1.1 Age;                                    Frequency and Percentage 1.1 Out of 30 respondents,
                                                       Distribution             majority of are 12 years old
                                                                                with a frequency and
                                                                                percentage of (seventeen) 17
                                                                                or 57 percent. Second is 11
                                                                                years old having (eleven) 11
                                                                                or 23 percent, then followed
                                                                                by 13 and 14 years of age
                                                                                having little interval, in
                                                                                company of (four) 4 or 13
                                                                                percent and (two) 2 or 7
                                                                                percent. This entails that
                                                                                most of the respondents
                                                                                chosen by random sampling
                                                                                are in age of 12 which is the
                                                                                accepted age as a freshmen
                                                                                in high school level.
1.2 Gender; and              Frequency and Percentage 1.2     Majority    of    the
                                Distribution             respondents     are    female
                                                         students having a frequency
                                                         of (twenty) 20 or 67 percent
                                                         and they outnumbered the
                                                         male students with only (ten)
                                                         10 or 33 percent or half than
                                                         that of female respondents.


   1.3 Section?                 Frequency and Percentage 1.3 section B soared high
                                Distribution             with (thirteen) 13 or 43
                                                         percent     of     the   total
                                                         respondents, succeeded by
                                                         section C having a frequency
                                                         of (nine) 9 or 30 percent and
                                                         lastly section A with only
                                                         (eight) 8 or 27 percent. This
                                                         implies that section B has the
                                                         most number of first year
                                                         students      subjected     as
                                                         representative       in    the
                                                         population.



2. How do the respondents
   perceive the influence of
   the following factors on
   their English proficiency:
2.1 Teachers‟             Weighted      mean   and    2.1 Teachers‟ competencies     For the concern of students‟
    Competencies;         Standard Deviation         (mean = 4.7) and interpreted    improvement, teachers may
                                                     as „Agree‟, This implies that   suit the interest particularly
                                                     English Proficiency level of    those specializing in English
                                                     high school students has        so that they will encourage
                                                     relation on how their English   students to study more the
                                                     teacher has certain qualities   basic structure of English
                                                     to demonstrate, assist, and     grammar.
                                                     teach that corresponds in
                                                     English subject.



2.2 Physical Condition;   Weighted      mean   and 2.2 Physical condition (mean
    and                   Standard Deviation       = 4.6) and interpreted as
                                                   „Agree‟. This indicates that
                                                   physical     condition      is
                                                   mutually related to the
                                                   English Proficiency of first
                                                   year students, in addition,
                                                   since the mean lies to the
                                                   4.21 – 5.0 values scale, it is
                                                   strongly    supported    that
                                                   readiness and physically
                                                   preparedness of respondents
                                                   are essential when it comes
                                                   to measuring proficiency
                                                   level.


2.3 School Environment?   Weighted      mean   and 2.3 School environment Institutions may provide
                          Standard Deviation       (mean = 4.5) and interpreted instructional materials such
                                                   as „Agree‟. This tell us that as Audio media since the
even School Environment is       respondents      has     low
                                                            crucial in developing English    frequency rate in verbal
                                                            Proficiency with the total       responsiveness and specially
                                                            mean of 4.5 and states the       provide good environmental
                                                            influence      of      school    atmosphere for learners.
                                                            atmosphere and development
                                                            of    English     proficiency
                                                            matters.


3. What is the level of
   students‟ Proficiency in
   English with reference to:

   3.1 spelling;                Frequency, Percentage       3.1 The overall mean is 0.64
                                Distribution and Weighted   with the verbal interpretation
                                mean                        of „Satisfactory‟. It can
                                                            clearly    see     that    the
                                                            respondents         performed
                                                            moderately in Spelling.



   3.2 vocabulary range;        Frequency, Percentage       3.2 The second part of the
                                Distribution and Weighted   test gained an overall mean
                                mean                        of 0.55 and the respondents
                                                            achieved „Fair‟ proficiency
                                                            level.



   3.3 verbal responsiveness    Frequency, Percentage       3.3 With an average of
                                Distribution and Weighted   percentage of fifteen (15)
mean                             and a mean of 0.15 with
                                                                                                 corresponding achievement
                                                                                                 of „Needs improvement‟ this
                                                                                                 entails that the Verbal
                                                                                                 Responsiveness is the most
                                                                                                 difficult part of English
                                                                                                 Proficiency Test.


   3.4 pluralizing; and                                         Frequency, Percentage            3.4 Fifty – five (55) percent
                                                                Distribution and Weighted        and an overall mean of 0.15.
                                                                mean                             This implies that respondents
                                                                                                 achieved „Fairly‟ on the
                                                                                                 Pluralizing test.




   3.5 subject and verb                                         Frequency, Percentage            3.5 With an average of 66
   agreement?                                                   Distribution and Weighted        percent and 0.66 mean. The
                                                                mean                             respondents succumb to the
                                                                                                 level of „Satisfactory‟ and
                                                                                                 performed vast range of
                                                                                                 scores with the last part of
                                                                                                 English Proficiency Test.



4. Is there a significant       There     is   no     significant Pearson Product Moment         4. All the said factors are
   relationship between the     relationship between the profile Correlation of Coefficient at   significantly related to the
   profile of the respondents   of the respondents and their 0.05 level of significance          result of English Proficiency
   and their level of English   level of English Proficiency.                                    Test of first year students.
   Proficiency?                                                                                  Age having r = 0.25 and p =
-0.0625, gender r = 0.56, p =
                                                                                                -0.3136 and section r = -
                                                                                                .077, p = 0.0329 since all p
                                                                                                values are less than 0.05
                                                                                                level of significance. This
                                                                                                only proves that there is a
                                                                                                significant      relationship
                                                                                                between the variables.

                                                                                                The hypothesis that there is
                                                                                                no significant relationship
                                                                                                between the profile of the
                                                                                                respondents and their level
                                                                                                of English Proficiency is
                                                                                                „Rejected‟.


5. Is there a significant       There is no significant          Pearson Product Moment 5. The correlation between               Since physical condition of
   relationship       between   relationship between English     Correlation of Coefficient at the Proficiency – related         the respondents also related
   English proficiency level    Proficiency level and the        0.05 level of significance    variables such as Teachers‟       to English Proficiency and
   and the proficiency –        proficiency - related factors.                                 competencies (r = -0.07, p =      likewise recommended that
   related variables?                                                                          0.0443), Physical condition       the    parents     are   vital
                                                                                               (r = -0.11, p = 0.0121), and      provocative when it comes to
                                                                                               school environment (r =           their children‟s physical
                                                                                               0.12, p = -0.0144) are all        condition      according    to
                                                                                               significantly related to the      colloquium             experts
                                                                                               English Proficiency Test          (International       Language
                                                                                               since the p – values are less     studies Association, 2001)
                                                                                               than     0.05     level      of   have been mentioned as one
                                                                                               significance. This attests that   of the recommendations, to
                                                                                               all the laid factors and          wit:
                                                                                               variables    influence      the
                                                                                               development of English               “Parents are direct
Proficiency.                     response indicator
                                                                    for their young
                                   The hypothesis that there is     and influentially
                                   no significant relationship      provide        such
                                   between English Proficiency      learners‟ needs to
                                   level and the proficiency -      gave interest; help
                                   related factors is „Rejected‟.   them (children) to
                                                                    develop journal or
                                                                    diary;     schedule
                                                                    periodic parent –
                                                                    teacher meetings
                                                                    so that parents can
                                                                    discern        their
                                                                    progress; enforce
                                                                    rules frequently to
                                                                    limit them to play
                                                                    and provide a
                                                                    pleasant climate
                                                                    so that when they
                                                                    go     to    school
                                                                    predicaments is
                                                                    partially reduced”.




________________________________
      WENDY C. SAN JUAN
            Researcher

More Related Content

Similar to Executive summary

correlatinal between the lack of resources to the academic performance of Gra...
correlatinal between the lack of resources to the academic performance of Gra...correlatinal between the lack of resources to the academic performance of Gra...
correlatinal between the lack of resources to the academic performance of Gra...MarkPauloDDagmante
 
Student accommodation and integration presentation
Student accommodation and integration presentationStudent accommodation and integration presentation
Student accommodation and integration presentationsad614
 
3_I's_Presentation[1].pptx
3_I's_Presentation[1].pptx3_I's_Presentation[1].pptx
3_I's_Presentation[1].pptxCelsoPalmaGil
 
SAMPLE-RESEARCH-HANDOUTS.docx
SAMPLE-RESEARCH-HANDOUTS.docxSAMPLE-RESEARCH-HANDOUTS.docx
SAMPLE-RESEARCH-HANDOUTS.docxdoleGamer
 

Similar to Executive summary (6)

Religious diversity Poland
Religious diversity PolandReligious diversity Poland
Religious diversity Poland
 
correlatinal between the lack of resources to the academic performance of Gra...
correlatinal between the lack of resources to the academic performance of Gra...correlatinal between the lack of resources to the academic performance of Gra...
correlatinal between the lack of resources to the academic performance of Gra...
 
Student accommodation and integration presentation
Student accommodation and integration presentationStudent accommodation and integration presentation
Student accommodation and integration presentation
 
3_I's_Presentation[1].pptx
3_I's_Presentation[1].pptx3_I's_Presentation[1].pptx
3_I's_Presentation[1].pptx
 
SAMPLE-RESEARCH-HANDOUTS.docx
SAMPLE-RESEARCH-HANDOUTS.docxSAMPLE-RESEARCH-HANDOUTS.docx
SAMPLE-RESEARCH-HANDOUTS.docx
 
Research.pptx
Research.pptxResearch.pptx
Research.pptx
 

More from Carie Justine Estrellado

Blundering Leadership Missteps by School Administrators (Tamara Arnott) ).docx
Blundering Leadership Missteps by School Administrators (Tamara Arnott) ).docxBlundering Leadership Missteps by School Administrators (Tamara Arnott) ).docx
Blundering Leadership Missteps by School Administrators (Tamara Arnott) ).docxCarie Justine Estrellado
 
UCSP Understanding Culture, Society, and Politics
UCSP Understanding Culture, Society, and PoliticsUCSP Understanding Culture, Society, and Politics
UCSP Understanding Culture, Society, and PoliticsCarie Justine Estrellado
 
examination for comprehensive exam practice problem
examination for comprehensive exam practice problemexamination for comprehensive exam practice problem
examination for comprehensive exam practice problemCarie Justine Estrellado
 
Political science (political culture and subculture)
Political science (political culture and subculture)Political science (political culture and subculture)
Political science (political culture and subculture)Carie Justine Estrellado
 
declamation piece for high school, english TRAGEDY
declamation piece for high school, english TRAGEDYdeclamation piece for high school, english TRAGEDY
declamation piece for high school, english TRAGEDYCarie Justine Estrellado
 

More from Carie Justine Estrellado (20)

Lesson Plan for demo
Lesson Plan for demoLesson Plan for demo
Lesson Plan for demo
 
searching for local literatures.docx
searching for local literatures.docxsearching for local literatures.docx
searching for local literatures.docx
 
post pandemic education
post pandemic educationpost pandemic education
post pandemic education
 
mindfulness
mindfulnessmindfulness
mindfulness
 
Blundering Leadership Missteps by School Administrators (Tamara Arnott) ).docx
Blundering Leadership Missteps by School Administrators (Tamara Arnott) ).docxBlundering Leadership Missteps by School Administrators (Tamara Arnott) ).docx
Blundering Leadership Missteps by School Administrators (Tamara Arnott) ).docx
 
Community quarantine classfications
Community quarantine classficationsCommunity quarantine classfications
Community quarantine classfications
 
Poverty
PovertyPoverty
Poverty
 
Poverty
PovertyPoverty
Poverty
 
Comprehensive reviewer for teachers
Comprehensive reviewer for teachersComprehensive reviewer for teachers
Comprehensive reviewer for teachers
 
UCSP Understanding Culture, Society, and Politics
UCSP Understanding Culture, Society, and PoliticsUCSP Understanding Culture, Society, and Politics
UCSP Understanding Culture, Society, and Politics
 
Deped career immersion
Deped career immersionDeped career immersion
Deped career immersion
 
sample quiz 4
sample quiz 4sample quiz 4
sample quiz 4
 
mindful breathing (Philippines)
mindful breathing (Philippines)mindful breathing (Philippines)
mindful breathing (Philippines)
 
Education 402
Education 402Education 402
Education 402
 
comprehensive exam for masters example
comprehensive exam for masters examplecomprehensive exam for masters example
comprehensive exam for masters example
 
examination for comprehensive exam practice problem
examination for comprehensive exam practice problemexamination for comprehensive exam practice problem
examination for comprehensive exam practice problem
 
factors affecting academic performance
factors affecting academic performancefactors affecting academic performance
factors affecting academic performance
 
Political science (political culture and subculture)
Political science (political culture and subculture)Political science (political culture and subculture)
Political science (political culture and subculture)
 
Sample quiz 3
Sample quiz 3Sample quiz 3
Sample quiz 3
 
declamation piece for high school, english TRAGEDY
declamation piece for high school, english TRAGEDYdeclamation piece for high school, english TRAGEDY
declamation piece for high school, english TRAGEDY
 

Executive summary

  • 1. Republic of the Philippines Laguna State Polytechnic University San Pablo City Campus San Pablo City EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Title: RELATED FACTORS AND ENGLISH PROFICIENCY OF FIRST YEAR STUDENTS AT PRUDENCIA D. FULE MEMORIAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC YEAR 2011 – 2012 Rationale: Public Secondary Institutions seek to produce highly skilled and competitive students, discover and enhance different aptitudes and interest in order to equip them with skills for productive endeavour and interactive communication. That is why one of the very important is that the secondary students would be proficient in English language not just on how they convey ideas and thoughts but rather to perpetuate in a proper intellectual exchanges. Hence, this study aims to find out and address the factor that affects the English proficiency of the first year students who are enrolled in Prudencia D. Fule Memorial National High School during the academic year 2011-2012. Significance of the Study The study will be significant to the following: Teachers and Instructors. The findings and implications of this study will give them ability in making English subjects more effectual teachers especially for those specializing English, for it will benefit them in a way of identifying the factors underlying English proficiency; Students. For it will help them to improve and be competent in using the second language; Parents. To furnish and give aid for their children an interest to learn the complexities of English language; and Researchers, for it will help them gain satisfaction for knowing some insights about the given problem and develop research skills to be more productive in the field that they had chosen to belong in the future profession.
  • 2. Statement of the Problem Hypotheses Statistical Treatment Findings & Conclusions Recommendations The aim of the study is to find Based on the findings out the factor that affects the English and conclusions made in the proficiency of the first year students study, the following who are enrolled in Prudencia recommendations are hereby National High School during the presented: academic year 2011-2012. Specifically, the study sought to answer the following questions: 1. What is the profile of the respondents in terms of: 1.1 Age; Frequency and Percentage 1.1 Out of 30 respondents, Distribution majority of are 12 years old with a frequency and percentage of (seventeen) 17 or 57 percent. Second is 11 years old having (eleven) 11 or 23 percent, then followed by 13 and 14 years of age having little interval, in company of (four) 4 or 13 percent and (two) 2 or 7 percent. This entails that most of the respondents chosen by random sampling are in age of 12 which is the accepted age as a freshmen in high school level.
  • 3. 1.2 Gender; and Frequency and Percentage 1.2 Majority of the Distribution respondents are female students having a frequency of (twenty) 20 or 67 percent and they outnumbered the male students with only (ten) 10 or 33 percent or half than that of female respondents. 1.3 Section? Frequency and Percentage 1.3 section B soared high Distribution with (thirteen) 13 or 43 percent of the total respondents, succeeded by section C having a frequency of (nine) 9 or 30 percent and lastly section A with only (eight) 8 or 27 percent. This implies that section B has the most number of first year students subjected as representative in the population. 2. How do the respondents perceive the influence of the following factors on their English proficiency:
  • 4. 2.1 Teachers‟ Weighted mean and 2.1 Teachers‟ competencies For the concern of students‟ Competencies; Standard Deviation (mean = 4.7) and interpreted improvement, teachers may as „Agree‟, This implies that suit the interest particularly English Proficiency level of those specializing in English high school students has so that they will encourage relation on how their English students to study more the teacher has certain qualities basic structure of English to demonstrate, assist, and grammar. teach that corresponds in English subject. 2.2 Physical Condition; Weighted mean and 2.2 Physical condition (mean and Standard Deviation = 4.6) and interpreted as „Agree‟. This indicates that physical condition is mutually related to the English Proficiency of first year students, in addition, since the mean lies to the 4.21 – 5.0 values scale, it is strongly supported that readiness and physically preparedness of respondents are essential when it comes to measuring proficiency level. 2.3 School Environment? Weighted mean and 2.3 School environment Institutions may provide Standard Deviation (mean = 4.5) and interpreted instructional materials such as „Agree‟. This tell us that as Audio media since the
  • 5. even School Environment is respondents has low crucial in developing English frequency rate in verbal Proficiency with the total responsiveness and specially mean of 4.5 and states the provide good environmental influence of school atmosphere for learners. atmosphere and development of English proficiency matters. 3. What is the level of students‟ Proficiency in English with reference to: 3.1 spelling; Frequency, Percentage 3.1 The overall mean is 0.64 Distribution and Weighted with the verbal interpretation mean of „Satisfactory‟. It can clearly see that the respondents performed moderately in Spelling. 3.2 vocabulary range; Frequency, Percentage 3.2 The second part of the Distribution and Weighted test gained an overall mean mean of 0.55 and the respondents achieved „Fair‟ proficiency level. 3.3 verbal responsiveness Frequency, Percentage 3.3 With an average of Distribution and Weighted percentage of fifteen (15)
  • 6. mean and a mean of 0.15 with corresponding achievement of „Needs improvement‟ this entails that the Verbal Responsiveness is the most difficult part of English Proficiency Test. 3.4 pluralizing; and Frequency, Percentage 3.4 Fifty – five (55) percent Distribution and Weighted and an overall mean of 0.15. mean This implies that respondents achieved „Fairly‟ on the Pluralizing test. 3.5 subject and verb Frequency, Percentage 3.5 With an average of 66 agreement? Distribution and Weighted percent and 0.66 mean. The mean respondents succumb to the level of „Satisfactory‟ and performed vast range of scores with the last part of English Proficiency Test. 4. Is there a significant There is no significant Pearson Product Moment 4. All the said factors are relationship between the relationship between the profile Correlation of Coefficient at significantly related to the profile of the respondents of the respondents and their 0.05 level of significance result of English Proficiency and their level of English level of English Proficiency. Test of first year students. Proficiency? Age having r = 0.25 and p =
  • 7. -0.0625, gender r = 0.56, p = -0.3136 and section r = - .077, p = 0.0329 since all p values are less than 0.05 level of significance. This only proves that there is a significant relationship between the variables. The hypothesis that there is no significant relationship between the profile of the respondents and their level of English Proficiency is „Rejected‟. 5. Is there a significant There is no significant Pearson Product Moment 5. The correlation between Since physical condition of relationship between relationship between English Correlation of Coefficient at the Proficiency – related the respondents also related English proficiency level Proficiency level and the 0.05 level of significance variables such as Teachers‟ to English Proficiency and and the proficiency – proficiency - related factors. competencies (r = -0.07, p = likewise recommended that related variables? 0.0443), Physical condition the parents are vital (r = -0.11, p = 0.0121), and provocative when it comes to school environment (r = their children‟s physical 0.12, p = -0.0144) are all condition according to significantly related to the colloquium experts English Proficiency Test (International Language since the p – values are less studies Association, 2001) than 0.05 level of have been mentioned as one significance. This attests that of the recommendations, to all the laid factors and wit: variables influence the development of English “Parents are direct
  • 8. Proficiency. response indicator for their young The hypothesis that there is and influentially no significant relationship provide such between English Proficiency learners‟ needs to level and the proficiency - gave interest; help related factors is „Rejected‟. them (children) to develop journal or diary; schedule periodic parent – teacher meetings so that parents can discern their progress; enforce rules frequently to limit them to play and provide a pleasant climate so that when they go to school predicaments is partially reduced”. ________________________________ WENDY C. SAN JUAN Researcher