This document summarizes a panel discussion on improving marketing effectiveness. The panel discussed four key areas to push the effectiveness agenda forward: 1) Moving beyond effectiveness by small increments and trying new approaches, 2) Treating effectiveness as a competitive sport to stand out from competitors, 3) Taking a more holistic view of return on investment beyond just direct sales, and 4) Introducing the language of risk and reward to marketing. The panelists from companies like Google, Adidas, and iris advocated for balancing short-term metrics with long-term brand building and finding new ways to measure the impact of marketing on future growth.
Welcome to EffWeek – we’ve partnered with the IPA
Wanted to give you a snapshot of the the latest thinking and perspectives in the industry
But we also want to push the conversation forward
Les Binet and Peter Field have updated the work of the long and the short of it to understand marketing effectiveness in the digital era
Fran Cassidy has led a project supported by CIMA and the IPA to understand the state of effectiveness culture in organisations
And the global investment firm Jefferies has been reseraching the CFO and City perpective.
We’re going to have some serious debate from Thinkbox
And to save them one debate I’m going to try starting with a definition
Always good to start these things with a definition
Clear on the business objective of marketing. What commercial outcome are we trying to create (both long and short term) (laddering up marketing objectives)
Driven by an evidenced view. This is about consistent, objective measurement.
But it’s not just about results. It’s about how results are used to drive future behaviours. And its about making clear decisions about what we should and shouldn’t do.
And it’s not a one off. It’s about a learning culture that combines planning, actioning and refining activity to constantly driving the business forward
A lot of organisations feel like they’re progressing. With a fast trajectory to it.
Over three quarters of organisations interviewed have increased resource, or created major new decision/reporting systems for effectiveness in the last 3 years.
Over a third have created specialist units in the last 3 years.
We are focussing more on this now. The budget is as big as the capital expenditure but has none of the rigour.
Commercial Finance Manager
Out of 10
Getting better or worse?
Crisis of growth.
Top line isn’t growing, so increased focus on bottom line. Efficiency over effectiveness
Patrick Barwise, London Business School
Martin Deboo, Jefferies
Budgets falling
Like football managers
Overall Responsibility still sits within the broad Marketing function.Differing levels of competence, but whilst all are confident they are improving their understanding, some feel they have created already solution that works well, or will do in next 12-24 months.
More involvement from board – which is q good thing / finance
Brand lost its currency – and point – in the boardroom
And boardroom more involved
Sales = current performance
Brand = future performance
We need everyone to understand this
Future performance is of course hard to measure. Brand measures are a proven way of understanding future performance
NB – those metrics that turn into KPIs – sometimes change – 20-40% change per year.
You have to get the leadership teams comfortable with the language and they have to understand and have confidence in the data, such as econometrics, so you don’t waste time challenging the data and discussing generalities, but having meaningful and nuanced discussions about what we should do.
Its to help create the oxygen to build funds to invest back into brands.
Reference to de risking
So that’s where we should be now. But how can we push the agenda forward?
Panel – effectiveness agenda for modern age
But looking at that data another way. Click throughs on banner advertising average around the 0.2% mark. Behaviourally targeted advertising are hitting up to 1.4%.
Which means the ad is being ignored by only 98.6% of people
Could we call that a win?
And we only need to turn to the IPA databank to remind ourselves that great creativity should aim not to drive incremental improvement, but a multiplier effect.
The fact that this stuff doesn’t come through isn’t built on what has gone before, but through creative leaps
And we only need to turn to the IPA databank to remind ourselves that great creativity should aim not to drive incremental improvement, but a multiplier effect.
The fact that this stuff doesn’t come through isn’t built on what has gone before, but through creative leaps
By the time it’s proven, it often doesn’t work any more
Always need to keep moving forward
From a looking back culture to a learning culture
Not enough to use variations
More of a test and learn approach
Future performance is of course hard to measure. Brand measures are a proven way of understanding future performance
But when we do test and learn, think more broadly about returns. Needs to be about more than ROI
ROI focuses on short term and ignores long term profit growth. Must find proxys for long term impact
Price elasticity has lost a lot of focus –marketing can uniquely impact consumer’s willingness to pay a premium for your brand
Future performance is of course hard to measure. Brand measures are a proven way of understanding future performance
Future performance is of course hard to measure. Brand measures are a proven way of understanding future performance
Welcome to EffWeek – we’ve partnered with the IPA
Wanted to give you a snapshot of the the latest thinking and perspectives in the industry
But we also want to push the conversation forward