SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 75
Natural Resources Conservation
           Programs
Indiana State Parks & Reservoirs




The mission of the Division of State Parks and Reservoirs is to manage and
interpret our unique natural, wildlife and cultural resources; to provide for
compatible recreational opportunities; and to sustain the integrity of those
resources for future generations.
Natural Areas Management on State Parks

The mission of the natural areas program is to promote, maintain and
   restore the integrity of our native ecological communities using sound
   science to ensure appropriate composition, structure, and function
   that reflects original Indiana landscapes.
• While providing opportunities for hiking, biking, camping, canoeing and
  many other forms of outdoor recreation, the state parks contain some of
  the finest natural areas in the state and Midwest.

•    These areas and others are currently home to more than 180 species
    listed as rare, threatened, or endangered on both state and federal lists.

• Most of these special areas require some form of active management to
  remain ecologically intact.
Active Management
• Deer reductions - State parks have managed
  the impacts of over browsing deer since 1993.
• Goose reductions - State parks have managed
  the impacts of overabundant geese since
  2007.
• Invasive Species Management
• Prescribed Fire
Other projects
• Dunes Creek daylighting project
• Prophetstown wetland restoration
• Brown Co. Little Blue Creek oak restoration
  project
Wildlife Management on Reservoirs

• The mission of the wildlife management
  program is to professionally restore, create,
  manage and conserve habitat suitable for
  native game species that results in diverse
  outdoor recreational experiences for hunters
  and other users alike.
• Managing game and non-game wildlife on
  reservoirs is largely about maintaining the proper
  resources that different populations of wildlife
  need, such as food, water, shelter, and other
  special needs. These are all components of
  habitat.
• Strong habitat management requires managers to
  use a handful of different tools and
  techniques. The most important of these is
  succession control, or manipulating how and
  where old fields mature into forests of different
  ages and structures. Other techniques include the
  use of prescribed fire and maintaining food plots
  and agricultural areas.
•   Reservoir Habitat Proportions
•   Crops 10%
•   Food Plots 3%
•   Grasses/Annual Weeds 12%
•   Mature Woodlands 48%
•   Successional Areas 25%
Crop Leases
• Eight reservoirs leased 47 units over 5,597
  acres for a four year period.
• Cumulative revenue from the four year lease
  will be approximately $657,500.00
  ($164,000.00 annually).
Trapping Leases
• Lease agreements generally include details
  such as allowable trap sets and species
  specific Information.
• Twenty-one units are currently leased by 13
  individuals. Cumulative revenue from the two
  year lease period will be approximately
  $3,200.
Recruitment/Retention Initiative
• Div. of Parks and Reservoirs has begun a new
  recruitment/retention initiative on IDNR reservoirs.
• A total of 21 events were held with more than 540 in
  attendance.
• Events regularly included partnerships with local and
  national organizations (friends groups, Dick’s Sporting
  Goods, Indiana State Trappers Association, local bait
  shops, 4-H, etc.). Most events have been very
  successful and we anticipate even more progress as we
  build and tweak the program.
Initiative Objectives
• Cultivate the value of outdoor sports.
• Promote the continuing heritage and
  significance of outdoor sports.
• Expose potential and existing newcomers to
  activities and skill sets.
• Create a better understanding of the wildlife
  management profession and related
  methods/techniques.
Div. of Fish & Wildlife
• Mission Statement
  Our mission is to professionally manage
  Indiana's fish and wildlife for present and
  future generations, balancing ecological,
  recreational, and economic benefits.
• In 1919, the Indiana state legislature established the Department of
  Conservation (today known as the Department of Natural
  Resources) and created a Division of Fish and Game (today called
  the Division of Fish and Wildlife). This division was granted the
  statutory responsibility of providing for the care of wild animal
  populations, on public and private property along with a program of
  management to serve the best interests of the resources and the
  people of Indiana.
• These programs were funded by hunters and anglers through the
  sale of hunting and fishing licenses. In 1937 and again in 1951,
  sportsmen and women increased their contribution to conservation
  funding by supporting creation of a federal excise tax on hunting
  and fishing equipment, called the wildlife and sport fish restoration
  grant program. These programs, which rely on the number of
  hunting and fishing licenses sold by each state for distribution of
  funds, continue to this day. In 1995 Indiana conservationists again
  demonstrated their commitment to conservation by supporting a
  voluntary income tax check-off program to fund non game and
  endangered wildlife conservation in Indiana.
Fisheries Programs
 PROGRAM                                       PURPOSE
• Fisheries Management:               protect fisheries
  resources & make fishing better
• Public Access:                      develop & maintain
  boating and fishing access to rivers and lakes
• Aquatic Invasive Species:          manage impacts of
  invasives such as Asian carp
• Contaminants:                     recover fish kill
  damages from responsible parties & restore habitats
• Lake and River Enhancement: reduce sediment &
  nutrient pollution
FUNDING SOURCES
Fisheries Management and Public Access programs
   are funded by dedicated license revenue,
   matched with 75% federal Sport Fish Restoration
   Funds for eligible activities. The Aquatic Invasive
   Species Program is funded with a blend of
   dedicated and federal monies, including federal
   funds from the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative.
   The Contaminants Program uses dedicated
   license revenue and the federal Sport Fish
   Restoration match as well as funds recovered
   from polluters (for non-salary restoration project
   expenses). The Lake and River Enhancement
   Program is funded from a boating fee that ranges
   from $5-$25 depending on boat value.
Wildlife Programs
 PROGRAM                                              PURPOSE
• Private Lands:               The Private Lands Unit is responsible for the
   management of wildlife populations and the restoration, enhancement, and
   maintenance of wildlife habitats on the privately-owned landscape of Indiana
• Public lands:                The Public Lands Unit is responsible for managing
   habitat quality and quantity on over 146,000 acres of public land for hunting,
   fishing, shooting, wildlife viewing, and a host of other compatible outdoor
   recreation activities.
• Diversity/Management:               The Diversity and Management unit oversees
   conservation projects and management of over 100 eligible species of greatest
   conservation need, including federal and state endangered and other rare species.
• Research:                              The Wildlife Research Unit is responsible for
   assessing the overall health and management of legally-harvested wildlife
   populations at multiple spatial scales; development and implementation of harvest
   recommendations and strategies; development and implementation of statewide
   population and harvest monitoring programs; constituent surveys and disease
   monitoring protocols; and serve as the Department’s experts regarding those
   wildlife species.
Funding Sources
• Research, Public Lands, and Private Lands programs are funded by
  dedicated license revenue, matched with 75% federal Sport Fish
  Restoration Funds for eligible activities with the remainder from various
  federal USDA grants, the Deer Research and Management Fund, and the
  Game Bird Habitat Restoration Fund.
• In almost every case, all the citizens of Indiana are deriving benefit from
  these services while only a small portion actually directly support those
  services through hunting and fishing license sales which are stable to
  declining in revenue. For instance, approximately 70% of the users on Fish
  and Wildlife Areas are non consumptive users that may never purchase a
  license. Those percentages are probably comparable for private lands.
• The Diversity and Management Program receives limited funding from the
  federal State Wildlife Grant Program and donations to the Nongame Fund,
  through the state income tax check-off. In almost every case, all the
  citizens of Indiana are deriving benefit from these services while only a
  small portion actually supports those services through the tax check off
  program which results in inconsistent and inadequate funding.
Environmental Programs
PROGRAM                                              PURPOSE
• Environmental Reviews:          Conduct environmental reviews for
  early coordination requests and permit applications for
  construction projects to minimize the impacts to fish, wildlife, and
  botanical resources and their habitat. This program is funded by
  dedicated license revenue, with 75% of the costs paid for by federal
  grant funds for eligible activities.
• Operations/Permitting:          Review and issue over twenty-five
  different types of commercial licenses and permits. Coordinate and
  oversee the administrative rule promulgation process for the
  Division of Fish and Wildlife to revise existing administrative rules
  and create new rules when needed for biological, social, or
  enforcement purposes. These programs are funded by dedicated
  license revenue.
Div. Of Nature Preserves
• Indiana's system of Nature Preserves was
  established by a 1967 act of the General
  Assembly. The system's purpose is to provide
  permanent protection for significant natural
  areas within the state.
• The first dedicated nature preserve was Pine
  Hills Nature Preserve in Shades State Park in
  1969.
• There are 242 Nature Preserves in IN.
• This represents more than 32,000 acres
  spread throughout Indiana.
• We work closely with many others in
  dedicating significant natural areas, for
  instance DNR State Parks, DNR Forestry, DNR
  Fish and Wildlife, Nature Conservancy and
  local land trusts, as well as local county park
  systems.
Nature Preserve Program
• provides in perpetuity protection for lands
  dedicated by the Natural Resources
  Commission, who accept the easement for the
  State. Numerous ownerships (agencies, local
  governments, universities, land trusts, etc).
• Funding for Nature Preserve staff, and Nature
  Preserve management is from a blend of
  General Funds and other funds (trust funds,
  federal grants, NRD funds, etc).
Division Programs
•   Nursery Inspections and Certification
•   Apiary Inspections
•   Quarantines
•   Permits and Licenses
•   Issuance of Phytosanitary Certificates
•   Exotic and Invasive Pest Surveys and
    Monitoring
All programs are covered under 312 IAC Article 18 under
authority of IC 14-24.
• Nature Preserve programs, similar in nature,
  are in place in Illinois, Kentucky, and Ohio.
• Due to the numerous license plates available
  to Hoosiers, funding for land acquisition
  through IHT is down; land acquisition funding
  is needed to secure critical additions to
  existing nature preserves, and to secure
  protection for Indiana’s few remaining natural
  areas.
Natural Heritage Program
• Tracks information on rare species, high quality
  natural areas, and managed lands.
• Heritage Programs are found in all 50 states, and
  numerous countries.
• Funding comes from General Funds, Office of
  Surface Mining funds, and other sources.
• Serves as the “Lands Unsuitable for Mining”
  database for the Division of Reclamation
  (required by the federal Office of Surface Mining).
Lake Michigan Coastal Program
• Federally funded program that provides
  funding (approximately $750,000 annually,
  with funding determined by a state’s
  population and number of miles of shoreline)
  to governmental agencies and non-profit in
  Indiana’s coastal area to help protect coastal
  resources.
• Funds can be for resource restoration, land acquisition, and
  planning:
1. Protection and restoration of significant natural and cultural
   resources.
2. Programs to prevent the loss of life and property in coastal hazard
   areas.
3. Improved public access for recreational purposes.
4. Revitalized urban waterfronts and ports.
5. Improved coordination among government agencies in policy and
   decision-making processes.
6. Pollution prevention initiatives, including non-point source
   pollution into coastal waters.

• Staff are funded with a blend of cigarette tax funds and matching
  federal funds.
• All eligible states (great lake or ocean coasts) have a coastal
  program.
Division of Forestry
Nursery Section
• Mission
  To grow and distribute to Indiana landowners,
  high quality native plant materials for
  conservation plantings. Conservation
  plantings include plantings for timber, wildlife,
  windbreaks, soil and water protection, mine
  reclamation, carbon sequestering and
  education
Who We Serve


            2%
      20%         30%   Mineland Reclamation
                        Environmental Programs
15%                     Timber Production
                   8%
            25%         Wildlife Habitat
                        Windbreak Establishment
                        Arbor Day
FY       Conifers   Hardwoods   Total       Revenues


07-08    757,151    2,918,832   3,675,983   $1,265,610


08-09    700,000    2,832,005   3,532,005   $1,283,532


09-10    384,562    2,845,280   3,229,842   $1,166,013


10-11    395,162    2,786,678   3,181,840   $1,053,231


*11-12   400,000    2,800,000   3,200,000   $1,200,000
STATE FOREST SECTION
Indiana’s State Forest System
• Working lands managed for multiple benefits
  – 13 State Forests
  – 156,000 acres
  – Includes 17 nature preserves (2,369 acres)
  – Timber, wildlife, hunting, foraging, camping, lakes,
    firewood
  – 4,500 acres forest restoration activities annually
      • Reforestation, forest improvement, invasive species, erosion
        control.
      • Funded by timber revenues, capital funding and operating
        budgets
      • Approx $200,000/year
State Forests- Surrounding States
  (Only Indiana and Ohio Certified as Well Managed by
international certification systems –Green Certification)
Indiana State Forests
             Conserving Biodiversity
• Sustainable Forest Resource Management
    • Timber harvests and restoration activities administered by professional
      foresters at all forests
    • Forest management results in habitat diversity, supporting high species
      diversity
    • Several Nature Preserves established and managed
• Certified as well managed by FSC & SFI
    •   14 million board feet green certified hardwoods sold last FY
    •   Approximately $3 million (15% returned to counties)
    •   Harvest approximately 50% of annual growth
    •   State Forest continue to increase in timber volume
• Forest Research
    – HEE project (a 100 year effort)
          – In Eastern US only Missouri has a similar project
    – Independent research projects ongoing (2011: 15 projects, 11 partners)
    – Continuous Forest Inventory system remeasured
Indiana State Forests
                         Conservation Concerns
•   Public support
     •   Indiana DNR and the Division of Forestry has a long positive history -the envy of many states
•   Protection of important lands
     – Consolidating ownership improves sustainability
     – General land acquisition funding has declined while land availability has gone up
•   Management of invasive species (plants, animals, insects, disease)
     – Work never ends
     – Reintroduction of American Chestnut a possibility
•   Protecting species of greatest conservation need
     – Indiana bat habitat conservation plan
     – Environmental Assessment completed for 2008-2027
     – Research includes management effects on endangered species
•   Sustainable lakes
     – Aging lakes filling with sediment
     – Maintenance and repair of aging dams
PRIVATE LANDS SECTION
Private Lands Management
• The Division spends approx. $1.2 million/year to fund
  District Forester operations. Most of this money goes to
  salary and support to administer the Classified Forest and
  Wildlands Program.
• The Division works with the USDA Natural Resources
  Conservation Service to provide cost share money to assist
  private landowners in completing forestry practices. In
  2009-2010 $2.2 million in assistance was provided
• The Licensed Timber Buyers Program regulates the
  purchase of logs or standing timber from both public and
  private lands. The law offers landowners legal remedies if
  the landowner thinks that their trees have been wrongfully
  cut or if the landowner is not paid for the trees as agreed.
  The $80 thousand collected in fees supports the program.
Classified Forest & Wildlands Program

                 Program authorized March 10,1921.

                 Purpose: To encourage timber
                 production, wildlife habitat, and
                 protect water quality on private
                 lands.

                 Landowner incentive: Property tax
                 reduction (Assessed value for
                 enrolled land = $1/acre)

                 Program administered by the
                 Division of Forestry
Classified Forest & Wildlands Program
                                      Program Growth
                                             Classified Program Enrollment
                                                        Classified Forest 1921 -2005
                                                Classifed Forest & Wildlands 2006-present
700,000

600,000

500,000

400,000

300,000                                                                                                                                 ACRES ENROLLED
200,000

100,000

     0
          1925

                 1930

                        1935

                               1940

                                      1945

                                             1950

                                                    1955

                                                           1960

                                                                  1965

                                                                         1970

                                                                                1975

                                                                                       1980

                                                                                              1985

                                                                                                     1990

                                                                                                            1995

                                                                                                                   2000

                                                                                                                          2005

                                                                                                                                 2010
   The 5 year average (2005-2010) for program growth is 19,800 acres/year. Program
   growth is expected to remain near this rate or higher, depending on staffing levels.
Classified Forest & Wildlands Program
           Comparison to Surrounding States’
              Forest Tax Law Programs
Wisconsin                                                         Indiana
Managed Forest Law                                                Classified Forest & Wildlands
•Property tax deduction (amount                                   •Property tax deduction (Assessed
depend on if public access is                                     value = $1/acres)
granted)                                                          •Management plan required
•10 acre minimum                                                  •10 acre minimum
•Management plan required                                         •No public access required
•Green certification through FSC &                                •Green certification through FSC &
ATFS.                                                             ATFS.

                                                                  Michigan
Illinois                                                          Commercial Forest Program
Forestry Development Act             Ohio                         •Property tax deduction
•Open to forest land in counties     Ohio Forest Tax Law          •State pays counties $1.20/enrolled
with < 3 million inhabitants         • Property tax deduction     acres
•Property tax deduction              •10 acres minimum            • Enrolled land open for public
(assessed value at 1/6 value)        •Management plan             hunting, trapping & fishing
•Management plan require             required
•No public access required           •No public access required
Division of Forestry
   “Green” Forest Certification
• State Forests
  – Forest Stewardship Council
    (FSC) & Sustainable Forestry
    Initiative (SFI)
  – 153,000 acres certified
  – 12,000,000 BdFT
• Classified Forest & Wildlands
  – American Tree Farm System &
    Forest Stewardship Council
  – 555,000+ acres certified
  – 35,000,000 BdFT
FIRE SECTION
Division of Forestry
               Fire Management
Four Focal Areas
1.   Fire Suppression
        Operational Suppression & Assistance
        Technical Assistance
        Predictive Services
2.   Fire prevention
        Public Awareness
        K-5 Programming
3.   Assistance to Rural & Volunteer Fire Departments
        Volunteer Fire Assistance Grants (VFA)
        Federal Excess Personal Program (FEPP)
        Rural Wildland Fire Suppression Training
4.   Prescribed Fire
        Ecological Burning
        Fuel Reduction / Mitigation
Fire Suppression
• Fire Operations
   – State Lands
   – Private lands
   – Partner Agencies
• Technical Assistance
   – Working remotely to assist
     Fire Departments with
     firefighting strategy and
     tactics.
• Predictive Services
   – Seasonal Outlooks
   – Fuels monitoring
   – Drought Task Force
Fire Prevention
        • Public Awareness
          – Education of the masses
            on the dangers of
            wildfires emphasizing Fire
            Prevention.
          – Hazard Mitigation
        • K-5 Programming
          – Fire Safety
          – Good Fire vs. Bad Fire
          – Responsibility
Assistance to Rural / Volunteer
           Fire Departments
• Volunteer Fire Assistance (VFA)
  – Pass through grant from USDA Forest Service
  – 50/50 Program up to $10,000.00 total grant
     • Maximum $5,000.00 Grant Funds / $5,000.00 Fire Dept.
     • Geared toward improving response to wildfires and
       improving ISO ratings.
     • Water handling, pumps, protective gear, communications.
• Federal Excess Property Program (FEPP)
  – Agreement in place to acquire excess federal
    property and reassign to rural fire departments
  – Trucks, generators, fire apparatus, etc.
Prescribed Fire
• Ecological Burning
  – Maintaining Fire Dependent
    Habitat
  – Habitat Restoration
  – Oak Regeneration
• Fuel Reduction / Mitigation
  – Rx Fire applied to lessen
    effects of fire in critical
    areas
Indiana’s Unique Approach
Benefits…
• Directed support of Rural & Volunteer Fire Departments
   – A proportionally small fire staff supports local level efforts to
     limit State level expense.
• Utilization of Multiple-duty Departmental Personnel
   – Support for Fire operations is provided by fire trained personnel
     in DNR’s land holding divisions.
• Leveraged funding through recurrent federal grants
  focused on Wildland Fire Assistance in the State.
Detractors…
• Staff size is not commensurate with the demand for
  service – especially during the spring and fall operational
  fire seasons.
FOREST INVENTORY SECTION
Forest Resource Information
Forest Inventory & Analysis (FIA)
Continuous Forest Inventory (CFI)
•State Forest Properties System
•Classified Forest System
FIA
• Federal Forest Service Program administered by
  the DNR Division of Forestry
• Ongoing assessment since the 1950s
• Statewide assessment survey of forestland across
  all ownerships representing all 4.5 million acres
  of forests in Indiana
• Approx $175,000 annually for the base program
  from the USFS
• DoF adds approx $80,000 annually to double the
  intensity of the survey
CFI Properties System
• Internal forest assessment survey of DoF
  owned/managed lands
• Estimated cost $100,000 annually
• Install and measure 800 plots annually equally
  dispersed throughout all properties
• Currently in the fourth year (80% of total
  sample)
CFI Classified Forest System
• Internal forest assessment survey of privately
  owned lands enrolled in the classified forest
  system
• Estimated cost $100,000 annually
• Install and measure 500 plots annually equally
  dispersed throughout the state on classified
  forest tracts
• Currently in the first year of the program
Division of Entomology and Plant
            Pathology
 Who are we? What do we do?



                      October 21st, 2009
                      Scott Kinzie
                      Nursery Inspector/Compliance Officer
• Our Mission is to Manage Plant and Apiary
  Pests for the Preservation and Protection of
  Cultivated and Natural Resources, to
  Facilitate Trade, and to Enhance the Quality
  and Appreciation of the Environment.
Small Division - - Large Outreach
                        Nursery Industry


                                 Logging/Timber Industry



                         The Bee Industry (Apiary)


                                 Exporters


                    Private Campgrounds (Firewood)

           Homeowners
Nurseries and Nursery Dealers
      Inspection and Licensing Program
• Required under IC 14-24
  “The division shall issue a certificate following an
  inspection that discloses that the nursery stock is
  apparently free from pests and pathogens”.
• This is an annual inspection and license which is required
  to sell plants within Indiana and to move and sell plants
  into other states.
• License fee - $50 and inspection fee $3/acre for nurseries
  growing plants in Indiana.
• Approximately 400 nurseries and 2,000 nursery dealers
Nurseries and Nursery Dealers
   Inspection and Licensing Program cont.
• Fees currently recover approximately 65% of program.
  Funded by general funds and dedicated account.
• All other states have nursery licensing program. The fees
  vary by state and Indiana is below some state fees.
Apiary Inspections
• Required under IC 14-24
  Inspection of bees being shipped out of Indiana to meet
  requirements of other states.
• Done upon request of Apiarist.
• No cost for Inspection or issuance of inspection
  certificate.
• General funds used to support cost of the inspection. No
  dedicated funds used and limited federal grant funds used
  when available.
• Not all states have an Apiary program.
Pest and Pathogen Permits

• Required under IC 14-24
  Permits from Division required to move pests and
  pathogens and plants with pest and pathogens within and
  into Indiana.
• Done primarily for research and education purposes.
• No cost for permit.
• General and dedicated funds used to support staff time to
  review and issue permits.
• Other states have similar permitting process.
• Some states charge for permit.
• Still an effective program as without it pests and
  pathogens maybe introduced and spread within.
Phytosanitary Program

• Required under Plant Pest Act and International Plant
  Protection Conventions.
  Agricultural, horticultural and silvicultural plants, plant
  products and other commodities moving in international
  trade must meet the destination countries entry
  requirements to prevent introduction of a pest or
  pathogen.
• Plants and plant products must be inspected by state or
  federal inspector who then issues phytosanitary
  document.
• Phytosanitary document issued by Entomology costs $50
  + $6 processing fee. Issued by USDA cost is $112 + $6.
Phytosanitary Program

• General and dedicated funds used to support staff time to
  inspect and issue document.
• Other states issue Phytosanitary documents and their
  costs are similar or greater than Indiana’s.
• Still an effective program as it is required to help Indiana
  businesses move corn, soybeans, popcorn, lumber and
  logs in international trade.
• Issue 2,000 to 3,000 phytosanitary documents per year.
• Funds go into Division’s Dedicated account.
Indiana Heritage Trust &
Indiana Natural Resources Foundation
History of NRF and IHT
 NRF established in 1990
 IHT established in 1992
 NRF Board populates the IHT Trust Committee by statute
 IHT is a funding mechanism for DNR land acquisition
 NRF is much broader in scope
 From 1992 – 2007 IHT and NRF had the same Executive Director
  which was a DNR employee.
 In 2007, through the leadership of the NRF, the NRF hired its first
  ever Executive Director to work solely for NRF.
Composition of
             16 Member Project Committee:
   Director – Division of Fish and Wildlife
   Director – Division of Forestry
   Director – Division of Nature Preserves
   Director – Division of State Parks
   Director – Division of Outdoor Recreation
   Director – Division State Museums and Historic Sites
 10 Individual citizens appointed by the Governor…
        Citizen appointees must have a demonstrated interest or experience
        in::
               1) Conservation or natural resources
               2) management of public property
       At least 1 member shall be appointed from each congressional district
Composition of
            17 Member Trust Committee:
 12 Members of the Natural Resources Foundation
       Not more than 6 of whom may be of the same political affiliation
       At least one member appointed from each congressional district
  2 Members of the Senate appointed by the president pro
 tempore
 2 members of the House of Representatives appointed by
 the speaker
 The Treasurer of State of the Treasurer’s designee
IHT Funds Allocated

     For each $100,000 in revenue, the funds by law must be
                   allocated into specific accounts:
1.   Stewardship Account 5% of $100,000      $5,000
2.   State Parks Account            10% of balance     $9,500
3.   State Forests Account          10% of balance     $9,500
4.   Nature Preserves Account       10% of balance     $9,500
5.   Fish and Wildlife Account      10% of balance     $9,500
6.   Outdoor Rec./ Historic Sites   10% of balance     $9,500
7.   Discretionary Account 50% of balance    $47,500

                          Total:   $100,000
How an idea becomes a funded project
                                          Proposal is reviewed and
                                          essential details verified.                          All proposed projects are
Projects are submitted to                    Local officials are                               heard and voted on at the
   Trust for funding                       notified of each project.                            IHT Project Committee
     consideration                        Project is summarized on                                     meeting
                                              various forms for
                                             Committee review


 Governor’s office
reviews the projects                      A letter is prepared                              All proposed projects are
and sends a letter to                        and sent to the                                heard and voted on at the
 the DNR Director                         Governor detailing                                 Indiana Heritage Trust
   approving the                         all approved projects                                Committee Meeting
     proposals



                            Projects enter Land
                            Acquisition process
                                                                        =Internal Process              =External Process
How an approved project is completed

                                               All due diligence is               Documents are
   Division of Land                          complete including title          reviewed, signed by
Acquisition begins work                     work, appraisal, environm         grantor and returned to
      on project                             ental, surveys. Price is                  DNR
                                                    negotiated.




   Documents are
recorded, final title
      policy                                                             Documents are prepared an
                                            Check is issued and
issued, entered into                                                    entered into the signature and
                                            closing completed
 GIS, sent to State                                                           approval process
    Land Office




                        Petition Local Government Finance to
                                 remove from tax rolls
Projects Proposed by Division

         IHT Project Distribution

                       State Parks
                           9%


                                     Forestry
                                      25%
Nature Preserves
      42%                                                         Outdoor Rec

                                                Fish & Wildlife   Historic Sites
                                                     14%          Nature Preserves

      Historic Sites                                              State Parks
                               Outdoor Rec
           4%                                                     Forestry
                                   6%

                                                                  Fish & Wildlife
Acres Acquired by Division
           1996-2007 % Acreage Totals by Division


                           Outdoor
                          Recreation
             Forestry        2%
              19%

  Historic Sites                                         Fish & Wildlife
       2%                                                State Parks
                                                         Nature Preserves
                                       Fish & Wildlife   Historic Sites
                                            53%          Forestry
Nature Preserves
                                                         Outdoor Recreation
      16%


            State Parks
                8%
Accomplishments
   Protected 51,658 acres since inception
   Projects in 56 Counties
   345 completed projects
   #1 selling vanity plate every year


Ongoing challenges
 Funding
 Payment in lieu of taxes

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Resource depletion and conservation
Resource depletion and conservationResource depletion and conservation
Resource depletion and conservationArghyadeep Saha
 
Conservation of natural resources and environment
Conservation of natural resources and environmentConservation of natural resources and environment
Conservation of natural resources and environmenthome
 
6. management of natural resources
6. management of natural resources6. management of natural resources
6. management of natural resourcesAbhay Goyal
 
conservation of natural resources
conservation of natural resourcesconservation of natural resources
conservation of natural resourcesmrunal asatkar
 
Natural resource management
Natural resource management Natural resource management
Natural resource management shamshad ahmad
 
management of natural resources
management of natural resourcesmanagement of natural resources
management of natural resourcesRahul Malhotra
 
Management of natural resources
Management of natural resourcesManagement of natural resources
Management of natural resourcesNihaad Mohammed
 
Management of natural resources ppt
Management of natural resources pptManagement of natural resources ppt
Management of natural resources pptSiraj Haider
 
World nature conservation day
World nature conservation dayWorld nature conservation day
World nature conservation daySarthak Bhardwaj
 
Environmental science project by u.subhash (1)
Environmental  science project by u.subhash (1)Environmental  science project by u.subhash (1)
Environmental science project by u.subhash (1)vardhamanece
 
Conservation OF NATURAL RESOURCES.
Conservation OF NATURAL RESOURCES.Conservation OF NATURAL RESOURCES.
Conservation OF NATURAL RESOURCES.RAJKUMARPOREL
 
X biology full notes chapter 5
X biology full notes chapter 5X biology full notes chapter 5
X biology full notes chapter 5neeraj_enrique
 
Natural Resource Conservation Initiative & Optimization Initiative
Natural Resource Conservation Initiative & Optimization Initiative Natural Resource Conservation Initiative & Optimization Initiative
Natural Resource Conservation Initiative & Optimization Initiative Uflex Ltd.
 
Management of natural resources.ppt
Management of natural resources.pptManagement of natural resources.ppt
Management of natural resources.pptahamed01
 
Common property RIGHT by abhinav
Common property RIGHT by abhinavCommon property RIGHT by abhinav
Common property RIGHT by abhinavDEVIKA ANTHARJANAM
 
MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CLASS X D
MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CLASS X D MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CLASS X D
MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CLASS X D Shephali Bose
 
Management of natural resources priti
Management of natural resources pritiManagement of natural resources priti
Management of natural resources pritiShephali Bose
 
Management of natural resources
Management of natural resourcesManagement of natural resources
Management of natural resourcesMasetro
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Natural Resources and Conservation
Natural Resources and ConservationNatural Resources and Conservation
Natural Resources and Conservation
 
Resource depletion and conservation
Resource depletion and conservationResource depletion and conservation
Resource depletion and conservation
 
Conservation of natural resources and environment
Conservation of natural resources and environmentConservation of natural resources and environment
Conservation of natural resources and environment
 
6. management of natural resources
6. management of natural resources6. management of natural resources
6. management of natural resources
 
conservation of natural resources
conservation of natural resourcesconservation of natural resources
conservation of natural resources
 
Natural resource management
Natural resource management Natural resource management
Natural resource management
 
management of natural resources
management of natural resourcesmanagement of natural resources
management of natural resources
 
Management of natural resources
Management of natural resourcesManagement of natural resources
Management of natural resources
 
Management of natural resources ppt
Management of natural resources pptManagement of natural resources ppt
Management of natural resources ppt
 
World nature conservation day
World nature conservation dayWorld nature conservation day
World nature conservation day
 
Environmental science project by u.subhash (1)
Environmental  science project by u.subhash (1)Environmental  science project by u.subhash (1)
Environmental science project by u.subhash (1)
 
Conservation OF NATURAL RESOURCES.
Conservation OF NATURAL RESOURCES.Conservation OF NATURAL RESOURCES.
Conservation OF NATURAL RESOURCES.
 
X biology full notes chapter 5
X biology full notes chapter 5X biology full notes chapter 5
X biology full notes chapter 5
 
Global depletion and conservation of natural resources
Global depletion and conservation  of natural resourcesGlobal depletion and conservation  of natural resources
Global depletion and conservation of natural resources
 
Natural Resource Conservation Initiative & Optimization Initiative
Natural Resource Conservation Initiative & Optimization Initiative Natural Resource Conservation Initiative & Optimization Initiative
Natural Resource Conservation Initiative & Optimization Initiative
 
Management of natural resources.ppt
Management of natural resources.pptManagement of natural resources.ppt
Management of natural resources.ppt
 
Common property RIGHT by abhinav
Common property RIGHT by abhinavCommon property RIGHT by abhinav
Common property RIGHT by abhinav
 
MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CLASS X D
MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CLASS X D MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CLASS X D
MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CLASS X D
 
Management of natural resources priti
Management of natural resources pritiManagement of natural resources priti
Management of natural resources priti
 
Management of natural resources
Management of natural resourcesManagement of natural resources
Management of natural resources
 

Ähnlich wie Indiana DNR Natural Resources Conservation Programs - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force

Government and bussiness - economy and the environment
Government and bussiness - economy and the environmentGovernment and bussiness - economy and the environment
Government and bussiness - economy and the environmentJenniferEbascoVicent
 
2009 Workshop STC Handout 7 23 09
2009 Workshop STC Handout 7 23 092009 Workshop STC Handout 7 23 09
2009 Workshop STC Handout 7 23 09Brad Jordahl Redlin
 
Sustain and unsustainable use of Biological resources
Sustain and unsustainable use of Biological resourcesSustain and unsustainable use of Biological resources
Sustain and unsustainable use of Biological resourcesRaheel Hayat Rahee
 
SEAKFHP unveils draft strategic action plan at 2013 SE AK Watershed Symposium
SEAKFHP unveils draft strategic action plan at 2013 SE AK Watershed SymposiumSEAKFHP unveils draft strategic action plan at 2013 SE AK Watershed Symposium
SEAKFHP unveils draft strategic action plan at 2013 SE AK Watershed Symposiumseakfhp
 
ACSP Certification
ACSP CertificationACSP Certification
ACSP Certificationclecour
 
Chapter 11 presen part 2
Chapter 11 presen  part 2Chapter 11 presen  part 2
Chapter 11 presen part 2Yavapai College
 
Nisqually Watershed Stewardship Plan: Status Report 2018 Draft Presentation
Nisqually Watershed Stewardship Plan: Status Report 2018 Draft PresentationNisqually Watershed Stewardship Plan: Status Report 2018 Draft Presentation
Nisqually Watershed Stewardship Plan: Status Report 2018 Draft PresentationNisqually River Council
 
Paths to Fisheries Subsidies Reform: Creating sustainable fisheries through t...
Paths to Fisheries Subsidies Reform: Creating sustainable fisheries through t...Paths to Fisheries Subsidies Reform: Creating sustainable fisheries through t...
Paths to Fisheries Subsidies Reform: Creating sustainable fisheries through t...The Rockefeller Foundation
 
Approved Kashwakamak Lake Sustainability Plan - July 2016
Approved Kashwakamak Lake Sustainability Plan - July 2016Approved Kashwakamak Lake Sustainability Plan - July 2016
Approved Kashwakamak Lake Sustainability Plan - July 2016Scott_A_Bennett
 
New Farm Bill Potential for the Great Lakes-Logan, 2012
New Farm Bill Potential for the Great Lakes-Logan, 2012New Farm Bill Potential for the Great Lakes-Logan, 2012
New Farm Bill Potential for the Great Lakes-Logan, 2012Healthy Lakes, Healthy Lives
 
Conservation approach Fish Genetics and Resource Management (FiGR)
Conservation approach Fish Genetics and Resource Management (FiGR)Conservation approach Fish Genetics and Resource Management (FiGR)
Conservation approach Fish Genetics and Resource Management (FiGR)Ranjan Wagle
 
marygriffingcc2014
marygriffingcc2014marygriffingcc2014
marygriffingcc2014GWT
 
EQIP LWG Sep 2007 Linkedin
EQIP LWG Sep 2007 LinkedinEQIP LWG Sep 2007 Linkedin
EQIP LWG Sep 2007 LinkedinScott Harger
 
NACD Summer Meeting Joint_Chief LRP Presentation_Final.pptx
NACD Summer Meeting Joint_Chief LRP Presentation_Final.pptxNACD Summer Meeting Joint_Chief LRP Presentation_Final.pptx
NACD Summer Meeting Joint_Chief LRP Presentation_Final.pptxIselaOrtiz10
 
Sustainable Fisheries in the Indian Context
Sustainable Fisheries in the Indian ContextSustainable Fisheries in the Indian Context
Sustainable Fisheries in the Indian ContextMohanJoseph Modayil
 
NOAA Ecosystem Goal Fisheries Management Program
NOAA Ecosystem Goal Fisheries Management ProgramNOAA Ecosystem Goal Fisheries Management Program
NOAA Ecosystem Goal Fisheries Management ProgramMichael Newbold
 
Making regional and national policies and processes to secure Rangelands and ...
Making regional and national policies and processes to secure Rangelands and ...Making regional and national policies and processes to secure Rangelands and ...
Making regional and national policies and processes to secure Rangelands and ...Francois Stepman
 
Community Based Conservation
Community Based ConservationCommunity Based Conservation
Community Based ConservationByron Mitchell
 

Ähnlich wie Indiana DNR Natural Resources Conservation Programs - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force (20)

Government and bussiness - economy and the environment
Government and bussiness - economy and the environmentGovernment and bussiness - economy and the environment
Government and bussiness - economy and the environment
 
2009 Workshop STC Handout 7 23 09
2009 Workshop STC Handout 7 23 092009 Workshop STC Handout 7 23 09
2009 Workshop STC Handout 7 23 09
 
Sustain and unsustainable use of Biological resources
Sustain and unsustainable use of Biological resourcesSustain and unsustainable use of Biological resources
Sustain and unsustainable use of Biological resources
 
SEAKFHP unveils draft strategic action plan at 2013 SE AK Watershed Symposium
SEAKFHP unveils draft strategic action plan at 2013 SE AK Watershed SymposiumSEAKFHP unveils draft strategic action plan at 2013 SE AK Watershed Symposium
SEAKFHP unveils draft strategic action plan at 2013 SE AK Watershed Symposium
 
ACSP Certification
ACSP CertificationACSP Certification
ACSP Certification
 
Chapter 11 presen part 2
Chapter 11 presen  part 2Chapter 11 presen  part 2
Chapter 11 presen part 2
 
Nisqually Watershed Stewardship Plan: Status Report 2018 Draft Presentation
Nisqually Watershed Stewardship Plan: Status Report 2018 Draft PresentationNisqually Watershed Stewardship Plan: Status Report 2018 Draft Presentation
Nisqually Watershed Stewardship Plan: Status Report 2018 Draft Presentation
 
Paths to Fisheries Subsidies Reform: Creating sustainable fisheries through t...
Paths to Fisheries Subsidies Reform: Creating sustainable fisheries through t...Paths to Fisheries Subsidies Reform: Creating sustainable fisheries through t...
Paths to Fisheries Subsidies Reform: Creating sustainable fisheries through t...
 
Approved Kashwakamak Lake Sustainability Plan - July 2016
Approved Kashwakamak Lake Sustainability Plan - July 2016Approved Kashwakamak Lake Sustainability Plan - July 2016
Approved Kashwakamak Lake Sustainability Plan - July 2016
 
New Farm Bill Potential for the Great Lakes-Logan, 2012
New Farm Bill Potential for the Great Lakes-Logan, 2012New Farm Bill Potential for the Great Lakes-Logan, 2012
New Farm Bill Potential for the Great Lakes-Logan, 2012
 
Conservation approach Fish Genetics and Resource Management (FiGR)
Conservation approach Fish Genetics and Resource Management (FiGR)Conservation approach Fish Genetics and Resource Management (FiGR)
Conservation approach Fish Genetics and Resource Management (FiGR)
 
marygriffingcc2014
marygriffingcc2014marygriffingcc2014
marygriffingcc2014
 
EQIP LWG Sep 2007 Linkedin
EQIP LWG Sep 2007 LinkedinEQIP LWG Sep 2007 Linkedin
EQIP LWG Sep 2007 Linkedin
 
NACD Summer Meeting Joint_Chief LRP Presentation_Final.pptx
NACD Summer Meeting Joint_Chief LRP Presentation_Final.pptxNACD Summer Meeting Joint_Chief LRP Presentation_Final.pptx
NACD Summer Meeting Joint_Chief LRP Presentation_Final.pptx
 
Sustainable Fisheries in the Indian Context
Sustainable Fisheries in the Indian ContextSustainable Fisheries in the Indian Context
Sustainable Fisheries in the Indian Context
 
NOAA Ecosystem Goal Fisheries Management Program
NOAA Ecosystem Goal Fisheries Management ProgramNOAA Ecosystem Goal Fisheries Management Program
NOAA Ecosystem Goal Fisheries Management Program
 
Federal Programs for Watershed Restoration by John Hudson
Federal Programs for Watershed Restoration by John HudsonFederal Programs for Watershed Restoration by John Hudson
Federal Programs for Watershed Restoration by John Hudson
 
Dan inouye's record pdf
Dan inouye's record pdfDan inouye's record pdf
Dan inouye's record pdf
 
Making regional and national policies and processes to secure Rangelands and ...
Making regional and national policies and processes to secure Rangelands and ...Making regional and national policies and processes to secure Rangelands and ...
Making regional and national policies and processes to secure Rangelands and ...
 
Community Based Conservation
Community Based ConservationCommunity Based Conservation
Community Based Conservation
 

Mehr von Indiana Wildlife Federation

Indiana’s Water Supply: Managing the resource, avoiding conflict - Sustainabl...
Indiana’s Water Supply: Managing the resource, avoiding conflict - Sustainabl...Indiana’s Water Supply: Managing the resource, avoiding conflict - Sustainabl...
Indiana’s Water Supply: Managing the resource, avoiding conflict - Sustainabl...Indiana Wildlife Federation
 
Water Quality: An Indiana Primer - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 3...
Water Quality: An Indiana Primer - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 3...Water Quality: An Indiana Primer - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 3...
Water Quality: An Indiana Primer - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 3...Indiana Wildlife Federation
 
Indiana's Wildlife - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
Indiana's Wildlife - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11Indiana's Wildlife - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
Indiana's Wildlife - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11Indiana Wildlife Federation
 
Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...
Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...
Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...Indiana Wildlife Federation
 
Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...
Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...
Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...Indiana Wildlife Federation
 
Environmental Stewardship - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 9/28/11N...
Environmental Stewardship - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 9/28/11N...Environmental Stewardship - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 9/28/11N...
Environmental Stewardship - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 9/28/11N...Indiana Wildlife Federation
 
Biodiversity in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
Biodiversity in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11Biodiversity in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
Biodiversity in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11Indiana Wildlife Federation
 
Freshwater in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
Freshwater in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11Freshwater in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
Freshwater in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11Indiana Wildlife Federation
 
Phosphorus in Our Lawn Fertilizer: Threatening Indiana's Water from Lawn to Lake
Phosphorus in Our Lawn Fertilizer: Threatening Indiana's Water from Lawn to LakePhosphorus in Our Lawn Fertilizer: Threatening Indiana's Water from Lawn to Lake
Phosphorus in Our Lawn Fertilizer: Threatening Indiana's Water from Lawn to LakeIndiana Wildlife Federation
 

Mehr von Indiana Wildlife Federation (10)

Indiana’s Water Supply: Managing the resource, avoiding conflict - Sustainabl...
Indiana’s Water Supply: Managing the resource, avoiding conflict - Sustainabl...Indiana’s Water Supply: Managing the resource, avoiding conflict - Sustainabl...
Indiana’s Water Supply: Managing the resource, avoiding conflict - Sustainabl...
 
Water Quality: An Indiana Primer - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 3...
Water Quality: An Indiana Primer - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 3...Water Quality: An Indiana Primer - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 3...
Water Quality: An Indiana Primer - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 3...
 
Managing Indiana’s Air Resources
Managing Indiana’s Air ResourcesManaging Indiana’s Air Resources
Managing Indiana’s Air Resources
 
Indiana's Wildlife - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
Indiana's Wildlife - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11Indiana's Wildlife - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
Indiana's Wildlife - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
 
Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...
Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...
Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...
 
Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...
Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...
Status of Indiana’s Forest Resources - Sustainable Natural Resources Task For...
 
Environmental Stewardship - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 9/28/11N...
Environmental Stewardship - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 9/28/11N...Environmental Stewardship - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 9/28/11N...
Environmental Stewardship - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 9/28/11N...
 
Biodiversity in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
Biodiversity in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11Biodiversity in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
Biodiversity in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
 
Freshwater in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
Freshwater in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11Freshwater in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
Freshwater in Indiana - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force 11/10/11
 
Phosphorus in Our Lawn Fertilizer: Threatening Indiana's Water from Lawn to Lake
Phosphorus in Our Lawn Fertilizer: Threatening Indiana's Water from Lawn to LakePhosphorus in Our Lawn Fertilizer: Threatening Indiana's Water from Lawn to Lake
Phosphorus in Our Lawn Fertilizer: Threatening Indiana's Water from Lawn to Lake
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024DONAL88 GACOR
 
Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...
Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...
Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...Eticketing.co
 
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdfClash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdfMuhammad Hashim
 
Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...
Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...
Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...World Wide Tickets And Hospitality
 
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptxPGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptxaleonardes
 
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptxBenifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptxsherrymieg19
 
PPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports Rivalry
PPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports RivalryPPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports Rivalry
PPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports Rivalryanirbannath184
 
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptxBADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptxvillenoc6
 
Italy Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docx
Italy Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docxItaly Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docx
Italy Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docxWorld Wide Tickets And Hospitality
 
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWEProject & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWEDeShawn Ellis
 
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docxJORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docxArturo Pacheco Alvarez
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (12)

DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
DONAL88 >LINK SLOT PG SOFT TERGACOR 2024
 
Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...
Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...
Turkey Vs Georgia Vincenzo Montella's Squad Selection for Turkey's Euro 2024 ...
 
NATIONAL SPORTS DAY WRITTEN QUIZ by QUI9
NATIONAL SPORTS DAY WRITTEN QUIZ by QUI9NATIONAL SPORTS DAY WRITTEN QUIZ by QUI9
NATIONAL SPORTS DAY WRITTEN QUIZ by QUI9
 
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdfClash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
Clash of Titans_ PSG vs Barcelona (1).pdf
 
Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...
Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...
Spain Vs Italy Showdown Between Italy and Spain Could Determine UEFA Euro 202...
 
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptxPGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
PGC _ 3.1 _ Powerpoint (2024) scorm ready.pptx
 
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptxBenifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
Benifits of Individual And Team Sports-Group 7.pptx
 
PPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports Rivalry
PPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports RivalryPPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports Rivalry
PPT on INDIA VS PAKISTAN - A Sports Rivalry
 
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptxBADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
BADMINTON EQUIPMENTS / EQUIPMENTS GROUP9.pptx
 
Italy Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docx
Italy Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docxItaly Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docx
Italy Vs Albania Euro Cup 2024 Italy's Strategy for Success.docx
 
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWEProject & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
Project & Portfolio, Market Analysis: WWE
 
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docxJORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
JORNADA 2 LIGA MUROBASQUETBOL1 2024.docx
 

Indiana DNR Natural Resources Conservation Programs - Sustainable Natural Resources Task Force

  • 2.
  • 3. Indiana State Parks & Reservoirs The mission of the Division of State Parks and Reservoirs is to manage and interpret our unique natural, wildlife and cultural resources; to provide for compatible recreational opportunities; and to sustain the integrity of those resources for future generations.
  • 4. Natural Areas Management on State Parks The mission of the natural areas program is to promote, maintain and restore the integrity of our native ecological communities using sound science to ensure appropriate composition, structure, and function that reflects original Indiana landscapes.
  • 5. • While providing opportunities for hiking, biking, camping, canoeing and many other forms of outdoor recreation, the state parks contain some of the finest natural areas in the state and Midwest. • These areas and others are currently home to more than 180 species listed as rare, threatened, or endangered on both state and federal lists. • Most of these special areas require some form of active management to remain ecologically intact.
  • 6. Active Management • Deer reductions - State parks have managed the impacts of over browsing deer since 1993. • Goose reductions - State parks have managed the impacts of overabundant geese since 2007. • Invasive Species Management • Prescribed Fire
  • 7. Other projects • Dunes Creek daylighting project • Prophetstown wetland restoration • Brown Co. Little Blue Creek oak restoration project
  • 8. Wildlife Management on Reservoirs • The mission of the wildlife management program is to professionally restore, create, manage and conserve habitat suitable for native game species that results in diverse outdoor recreational experiences for hunters and other users alike.
  • 9. • Managing game and non-game wildlife on reservoirs is largely about maintaining the proper resources that different populations of wildlife need, such as food, water, shelter, and other special needs. These are all components of habitat. • Strong habitat management requires managers to use a handful of different tools and techniques. The most important of these is succession control, or manipulating how and where old fields mature into forests of different ages and structures. Other techniques include the use of prescribed fire and maintaining food plots and agricultural areas.
  • 10. Reservoir Habitat Proportions • Crops 10% • Food Plots 3% • Grasses/Annual Weeds 12% • Mature Woodlands 48% • Successional Areas 25%
  • 11. Crop Leases • Eight reservoirs leased 47 units over 5,597 acres for a four year period. • Cumulative revenue from the four year lease will be approximately $657,500.00 ($164,000.00 annually).
  • 12. Trapping Leases • Lease agreements generally include details such as allowable trap sets and species specific Information. • Twenty-one units are currently leased by 13 individuals. Cumulative revenue from the two year lease period will be approximately $3,200.
  • 13. Recruitment/Retention Initiative • Div. of Parks and Reservoirs has begun a new recruitment/retention initiative on IDNR reservoirs. • A total of 21 events were held with more than 540 in attendance. • Events regularly included partnerships with local and national organizations (friends groups, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Indiana State Trappers Association, local bait shops, 4-H, etc.). Most events have been very successful and we anticipate even more progress as we build and tweak the program.
  • 14. Initiative Objectives • Cultivate the value of outdoor sports. • Promote the continuing heritage and significance of outdoor sports. • Expose potential and existing newcomers to activities and skill sets. • Create a better understanding of the wildlife management profession and related methods/techniques.
  • 15. Div. of Fish & Wildlife • Mission Statement Our mission is to professionally manage Indiana's fish and wildlife for present and future generations, balancing ecological, recreational, and economic benefits.
  • 16. • In 1919, the Indiana state legislature established the Department of Conservation (today known as the Department of Natural Resources) and created a Division of Fish and Game (today called the Division of Fish and Wildlife). This division was granted the statutory responsibility of providing for the care of wild animal populations, on public and private property along with a program of management to serve the best interests of the resources and the people of Indiana. • These programs were funded by hunters and anglers through the sale of hunting and fishing licenses. In 1937 and again in 1951, sportsmen and women increased their contribution to conservation funding by supporting creation of a federal excise tax on hunting and fishing equipment, called the wildlife and sport fish restoration grant program. These programs, which rely on the number of hunting and fishing licenses sold by each state for distribution of funds, continue to this day. In 1995 Indiana conservationists again demonstrated their commitment to conservation by supporting a voluntary income tax check-off program to fund non game and endangered wildlife conservation in Indiana.
  • 17. Fisheries Programs PROGRAM PURPOSE • Fisheries Management: protect fisheries resources & make fishing better • Public Access: develop & maintain boating and fishing access to rivers and lakes • Aquatic Invasive Species: manage impacts of invasives such as Asian carp • Contaminants: recover fish kill damages from responsible parties & restore habitats • Lake and River Enhancement: reduce sediment & nutrient pollution
  • 18. FUNDING SOURCES Fisheries Management and Public Access programs are funded by dedicated license revenue, matched with 75% federal Sport Fish Restoration Funds for eligible activities. The Aquatic Invasive Species Program is funded with a blend of dedicated and federal monies, including federal funds from the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. The Contaminants Program uses dedicated license revenue and the federal Sport Fish Restoration match as well as funds recovered from polluters (for non-salary restoration project expenses). The Lake and River Enhancement Program is funded from a boating fee that ranges from $5-$25 depending on boat value.
  • 19. Wildlife Programs PROGRAM PURPOSE • Private Lands: The Private Lands Unit is responsible for the management of wildlife populations and the restoration, enhancement, and maintenance of wildlife habitats on the privately-owned landscape of Indiana • Public lands: The Public Lands Unit is responsible for managing habitat quality and quantity on over 146,000 acres of public land for hunting, fishing, shooting, wildlife viewing, and a host of other compatible outdoor recreation activities. • Diversity/Management: The Diversity and Management unit oversees conservation projects and management of over 100 eligible species of greatest conservation need, including federal and state endangered and other rare species. • Research: The Wildlife Research Unit is responsible for assessing the overall health and management of legally-harvested wildlife populations at multiple spatial scales; development and implementation of harvest recommendations and strategies; development and implementation of statewide population and harvest monitoring programs; constituent surveys and disease monitoring protocols; and serve as the Department’s experts regarding those wildlife species.
  • 20. Funding Sources • Research, Public Lands, and Private Lands programs are funded by dedicated license revenue, matched with 75% federal Sport Fish Restoration Funds for eligible activities with the remainder from various federal USDA grants, the Deer Research and Management Fund, and the Game Bird Habitat Restoration Fund. • In almost every case, all the citizens of Indiana are deriving benefit from these services while only a small portion actually directly support those services through hunting and fishing license sales which are stable to declining in revenue. For instance, approximately 70% of the users on Fish and Wildlife Areas are non consumptive users that may never purchase a license. Those percentages are probably comparable for private lands. • The Diversity and Management Program receives limited funding from the federal State Wildlife Grant Program and donations to the Nongame Fund, through the state income tax check-off. In almost every case, all the citizens of Indiana are deriving benefit from these services while only a small portion actually supports those services through the tax check off program which results in inconsistent and inadequate funding.
  • 21. Environmental Programs PROGRAM PURPOSE • Environmental Reviews: Conduct environmental reviews for early coordination requests and permit applications for construction projects to minimize the impacts to fish, wildlife, and botanical resources and their habitat. This program is funded by dedicated license revenue, with 75% of the costs paid for by federal grant funds for eligible activities. • Operations/Permitting: Review and issue over twenty-five different types of commercial licenses and permits. Coordinate and oversee the administrative rule promulgation process for the Division of Fish and Wildlife to revise existing administrative rules and create new rules when needed for biological, social, or enforcement purposes. These programs are funded by dedicated license revenue.
  • 22. Div. Of Nature Preserves • Indiana's system of Nature Preserves was established by a 1967 act of the General Assembly. The system's purpose is to provide permanent protection for significant natural areas within the state.
  • 23. • The first dedicated nature preserve was Pine Hills Nature Preserve in Shades State Park in 1969. • There are 242 Nature Preserves in IN. • This represents more than 32,000 acres spread throughout Indiana. • We work closely with many others in dedicating significant natural areas, for instance DNR State Parks, DNR Forestry, DNR Fish and Wildlife, Nature Conservancy and local land trusts, as well as local county park systems.
  • 24. Nature Preserve Program • provides in perpetuity protection for lands dedicated by the Natural Resources Commission, who accept the easement for the State. Numerous ownerships (agencies, local governments, universities, land trusts, etc). • Funding for Nature Preserve staff, and Nature Preserve management is from a blend of General Funds and other funds (trust funds, federal grants, NRD funds, etc).
  • 25. Division Programs • Nursery Inspections and Certification • Apiary Inspections • Quarantines • Permits and Licenses • Issuance of Phytosanitary Certificates • Exotic and Invasive Pest Surveys and Monitoring All programs are covered under 312 IAC Article 18 under authority of IC 14-24.
  • 26. • Nature Preserve programs, similar in nature, are in place in Illinois, Kentucky, and Ohio. • Due to the numerous license plates available to Hoosiers, funding for land acquisition through IHT is down; land acquisition funding is needed to secure critical additions to existing nature preserves, and to secure protection for Indiana’s few remaining natural areas.
  • 27. Natural Heritage Program • Tracks information on rare species, high quality natural areas, and managed lands. • Heritage Programs are found in all 50 states, and numerous countries. • Funding comes from General Funds, Office of Surface Mining funds, and other sources. • Serves as the “Lands Unsuitable for Mining” database for the Division of Reclamation (required by the federal Office of Surface Mining).
  • 28. Lake Michigan Coastal Program • Federally funded program that provides funding (approximately $750,000 annually, with funding determined by a state’s population and number of miles of shoreline) to governmental agencies and non-profit in Indiana’s coastal area to help protect coastal resources.
  • 29. • Funds can be for resource restoration, land acquisition, and planning: 1. Protection and restoration of significant natural and cultural resources. 2. Programs to prevent the loss of life and property in coastal hazard areas. 3. Improved public access for recreational purposes. 4. Revitalized urban waterfronts and ports. 5. Improved coordination among government agencies in policy and decision-making processes. 6. Pollution prevention initiatives, including non-point source pollution into coastal waters. • Staff are funded with a blend of cigarette tax funds and matching federal funds. • All eligible states (great lake or ocean coasts) have a coastal program.
  • 31. Nursery Section • Mission To grow and distribute to Indiana landowners, high quality native plant materials for conservation plantings. Conservation plantings include plantings for timber, wildlife, windbreaks, soil and water protection, mine reclamation, carbon sequestering and education
  • 32. Who We Serve 2% 20% 30% Mineland Reclamation Environmental Programs 15% Timber Production 8% 25% Wildlife Habitat Windbreak Establishment Arbor Day
  • 33. FY Conifers Hardwoods Total Revenues 07-08 757,151 2,918,832 3,675,983 $1,265,610 08-09 700,000 2,832,005 3,532,005 $1,283,532 09-10 384,562 2,845,280 3,229,842 $1,166,013 10-11 395,162 2,786,678 3,181,840 $1,053,231 *11-12 400,000 2,800,000 3,200,000 $1,200,000
  • 35. Indiana’s State Forest System • Working lands managed for multiple benefits – 13 State Forests – 156,000 acres – Includes 17 nature preserves (2,369 acres) – Timber, wildlife, hunting, foraging, camping, lakes, firewood – 4,500 acres forest restoration activities annually • Reforestation, forest improvement, invasive species, erosion control. • Funded by timber revenues, capital funding and operating budgets • Approx $200,000/year
  • 36. State Forests- Surrounding States (Only Indiana and Ohio Certified as Well Managed by international certification systems –Green Certification)
  • 37. Indiana State Forests Conserving Biodiversity • Sustainable Forest Resource Management • Timber harvests and restoration activities administered by professional foresters at all forests • Forest management results in habitat diversity, supporting high species diversity • Several Nature Preserves established and managed • Certified as well managed by FSC & SFI • 14 million board feet green certified hardwoods sold last FY • Approximately $3 million (15% returned to counties) • Harvest approximately 50% of annual growth • State Forest continue to increase in timber volume • Forest Research – HEE project (a 100 year effort) – In Eastern US only Missouri has a similar project – Independent research projects ongoing (2011: 15 projects, 11 partners) – Continuous Forest Inventory system remeasured
  • 38. Indiana State Forests Conservation Concerns • Public support • Indiana DNR and the Division of Forestry has a long positive history -the envy of many states • Protection of important lands – Consolidating ownership improves sustainability – General land acquisition funding has declined while land availability has gone up • Management of invasive species (plants, animals, insects, disease) – Work never ends – Reintroduction of American Chestnut a possibility • Protecting species of greatest conservation need – Indiana bat habitat conservation plan – Environmental Assessment completed for 2008-2027 – Research includes management effects on endangered species • Sustainable lakes – Aging lakes filling with sediment – Maintenance and repair of aging dams
  • 40. Private Lands Management • The Division spends approx. $1.2 million/year to fund District Forester operations. Most of this money goes to salary and support to administer the Classified Forest and Wildlands Program. • The Division works with the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service to provide cost share money to assist private landowners in completing forestry practices. In 2009-2010 $2.2 million in assistance was provided • The Licensed Timber Buyers Program regulates the purchase of logs or standing timber from both public and private lands. The law offers landowners legal remedies if the landowner thinks that their trees have been wrongfully cut or if the landowner is not paid for the trees as agreed. The $80 thousand collected in fees supports the program.
  • 41. Classified Forest & Wildlands Program Program authorized March 10,1921. Purpose: To encourage timber production, wildlife habitat, and protect water quality on private lands. Landowner incentive: Property tax reduction (Assessed value for enrolled land = $1/acre) Program administered by the Division of Forestry
  • 42. Classified Forest & Wildlands Program Program Growth Classified Program Enrollment Classified Forest 1921 -2005 Classifed Forest & Wildlands 2006-present 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 ACRES ENROLLED 200,000 100,000 0 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 The 5 year average (2005-2010) for program growth is 19,800 acres/year. Program growth is expected to remain near this rate or higher, depending on staffing levels.
  • 43. Classified Forest & Wildlands Program Comparison to Surrounding States’ Forest Tax Law Programs Wisconsin Indiana Managed Forest Law Classified Forest & Wildlands •Property tax deduction (amount •Property tax deduction (Assessed depend on if public access is value = $1/acres) granted) •Management plan required •10 acre minimum •10 acre minimum •Management plan required •No public access required •Green certification through FSC & •Green certification through FSC & ATFS. ATFS. Michigan Illinois Commercial Forest Program Forestry Development Act Ohio •Property tax deduction •Open to forest land in counties Ohio Forest Tax Law •State pays counties $1.20/enrolled with < 3 million inhabitants • Property tax deduction acres •Property tax deduction •10 acres minimum • Enrolled land open for public (assessed value at 1/6 value) •Management plan hunting, trapping & fishing •Management plan require required •No public access required •No public access required
  • 44. Division of Forestry “Green” Forest Certification • State Forests – Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) & Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) – 153,000 acres certified – 12,000,000 BdFT • Classified Forest & Wildlands – American Tree Farm System & Forest Stewardship Council – 555,000+ acres certified – 35,000,000 BdFT
  • 46. Division of Forestry Fire Management Four Focal Areas 1. Fire Suppression  Operational Suppression & Assistance  Technical Assistance  Predictive Services 2. Fire prevention  Public Awareness  K-5 Programming 3. Assistance to Rural & Volunteer Fire Departments  Volunteer Fire Assistance Grants (VFA)  Federal Excess Personal Program (FEPP)  Rural Wildland Fire Suppression Training 4. Prescribed Fire  Ecological Burning  Fuel Reduction / Mitigation
  • 47. Fire Suppression • Fire Operations – State Lands – Private lands – Partner Agencies • Technical Assistance – Working remotely to assist Fire Departments with firefighting strategy and tactics. • Predictive Services – Seasonal Outlooks – Fuels monitoring – Drought Task Force
  • 48. Fire Prevention • Public Awareness – Education of the masses on the dangers of wildfires emphasizing Fire Prevention. – Hazard Mitigation • K-5 Programming – Fire Safety – Good Fire vs. Bad Fire – Responsibility
  • 49. Assistance to Rural / Volunteer Fire Departments • Volunteer Fire Assistance (VFA) – Pass through grant from USDA Forest Service – 50/50 Program up to $10,000.00 total grant • Maximum $5,000.00 Grant Funds / $5,000.00 Fire Dept. • Geared toward improving response to wildfires and improving ISO ratings. • Water handling, pumps, protective gear, communications. • Federal Excess Property Program (FEPP) – Agreement in place to acquire excess federal property and reassign to rural fire departments – Trucks, generators, fire apparatus, etc.
  • 50. Prescribed Fire • Ecological Burning – Maintaining Fire Dependent Habitat – Habitat Restoration – Oak Regeneration • Fuel Reduction / Mitigation – Rx Fire applied to lessen effects of fire in critical areas
  • 51. Indiana’s Unique Approach Benefits… • Directed support of Rural & Volunteer Fire Departments – A proportionally small fire staff supports local level efforts to limit State level expense. • Utilization of Multiple-duty Departmental Personnel – Support for Fire operations is provided by fire trained personnel in DNR’s land holding divisions. • Leveraged funding through recurrent federal grants focused on Wildland Fire Assistance in the State. Detractors… • Staff size is not commensurate with the demand for service – especially during the spring and fall operational fire seasons.
  • 53. Forest Resource Information Forest Inventory & Analysis (FIA) Continuous Forest Inventory (CFI) •State Forest Properties System •Classified Forest System
  • 54. FIA • Federal Forest Service Program administered by the DNR Division of Forestry • Ongoing assessment since the 1950s • Statewide assessment survey of forestland across all ownerships representing all 4.5 million acres of forests in Indiana • Approx $175,000 annually for the base program from the USFS • DoF adds approx $80,000 annually to double the intensity of the survey
  • 55. CFI Properties System • Internal forest assessment survey of DoF owned/managed lands • Estimated cost $100,000 annually • Install and measure 800 plots annually equally dispersed throughout all properties • Currently in the fourth year (80% of total sample)
  • 56. CFI Classified Forest System • Internal forest assessment survey of privately owned lands enrolled in the classified forest system • Estimated cost $100,000 annually • Install and measure 500 plots annually equally dispersed throughout the state on classified forest tracts • Currently in the first year of the program
  • 57. Division of Entomology and Plant Pathology Who are we? What do we do? October 21st, 2009 Scott Kinzie Nursery Inspector/Compliance Officer
  • 58. • Our Mission is to Manage Plant and Apiary Pests for the Preservation and Protection of Cultivated and Natural Resources, to Facilitate Trade, and to Enhance the Quality and Appreciation of the Environment.
  • 59. Small Division - - Large Outreach Nursery Industry Logging/Timber Industry The Bee Industry (Apiary) Exporters Private Campgrounds (Firewood) Homeowners
  • 60. Nurseries and Nursery Dealers Inspection and Licensing Program • Required under IC 14-24 “The division shall issue a certificate following an inspection that discloses that the nursery stock is apparently free from pests and pathogens”. • This is an annual inspection and license which is required to sell plants within Indiana and to move and sell plants into other states. • License fee - $50 and inspection fee $3/acre for nurseries growing plants in Indiana. • Approximately 400 nurseries and 2,000 nursery dealers
  • 61. Nurseries and Nursery Dealers Inspection and Licensing Program cont. • Fees currently recover approximately 65% of program. Funded by general funds and dedicated account. • All other states have nursery licensing program. The fees vary by state and Indiana is below some state fees.
  • 62. Apiary Inspections • Required under IC 14-24 Inspection of bees being shipped out of Indiana to meet requirements of other states. • Done upon request of Apiarist. • No cost for Inspection or issuance of inspection certificate. • General funds used to support cost of the inspection. No dedicated funds used and limited federal grant funds used when available. • Not all states have an Apiary program.
  • 63. Pest and Pathogen Permits • Required under IC 14-24 Permits from Division required to move pests and pathogens and plants with pest and pathogens within and into Indiana. • Done primarily for research and education purposes. • No cost for permit. • General and dedicated funds used to support staff time to review and issue permits. • Other states have similar permitting process. • Some states charge for permit. • Still an effective program as without it pests and pathogens maybe introduced and spread within.
  • 64. Phytosanitary Program • Required under Plant Pest Act and International Plant Protection Conventions. Agricultural, horticultural and silvicultural plants, plant products and other commodities moving in international trade must meet the destination countries entry requirements to prevent introduction of a pest or pathogen. • Plants and plant products must be inspected by state or federal inspector who then issues phytosanitary document. • Phytosanitary document issued by Entomology costs $50 + $6 processing fee. Issued by USDA cost is $112 + $6.
  • 65. Phytosanitary Program • General and dedicated funds used to support staff time to inspect and issue document. • Other states issue Phytosanitary documents and their costs are similar or greater than Indiana’s. • Still an effective program as it is required to help Indiana businesses move corn, soybeans, popcorn, lumber and logs in international trade. • Issue 2,000 to 3,000 phytosanitary documents per year. • Funds go into Division’s Dedicated account.
  • 66. Indiana Heritage Trust & Indiana Natural Resources Foundation
  • 67. History of NRF and IHT  NRF established in 1990  IHT established in 1992  NRF Board populates the IHT Trust Committee by statute  IHT is a funding mechanism for DNR land acquisition  NRF is much broader in scope  From 1992 – 2007 IHT and NRF had the same Executive Director which was a DNR employee.  In 2007, through the leadership of the NRF, the NRF hired its first ever Executive Director to work solely for NRF.
  • 68. Composition of 16 Member Project Committee:  Director – Division of Fish and Wildlife  Director – Division of Forestry  Director – Division of Nature Preserves  Director – Division of State Parks  Director – Division of Outdoor Recreation  Director – Division State Museums and Historic Sites  10 Individual citizens appointed by the Governor…  Citizen appointees must have a demonstrated interest or experience in:: 1) Conservation or natural resources 2) management of public property  At least 1 member shall be appointed from each congressional district
  • 69. Composition of 17 Member Trust Committee:  12 Members of the Natural Resources Foundation  Not more than 6 of whom may be of the same political affiliation  At least one member appointed from each congressional district  2 Members of the Senate appointed by the president pro tempore  2 members of the House of Representatives appointed by the speaker  The Treasurer of State of the Treasurer’s designee
  • 70. IHT Funds Allocated For each $100,000 in revenue, the funds by law must be allocated into specific accounts: 1. Stewardship Account 5% of $100,000 $5,000 2. State Parks Account 10% of balance $9,500 3. State Forests Account 10% of balance $9,500 4. Nature Preserves Account 10% of balance $9,500 5. Fish and Wildlife Account 10% of balance $9,500 6. Outdoor Rec./ Historic Sites 10% of balance $9,500 7. Discretionary Account 50% of balance $47,500 Total: $100,000
  • 71. How an idea becomes a funded project Proposal is reviewed and essential details verified. All proposed projects are Projects are submitted to Local officials are heard and voted on at the Trust for funding notified of each project. IHT Project Committee consideration Project is summarized on meeting various forms for Committee review Governor’s office reviews the projects A letter is prepared All proposed projects are and sends a letter to and sent to the heard and voted on at the the DNR Director Governor detailing Indiana Heritage Trust approving the all approved projects Committee Meeting proposals Projects enter Land Acquisition process =Internal Process =External Process
  • 72. How an approved project is completed All due diligence is Documents are Division of Land complete including title reviewed, signed by Acquisition begins work work, appraisal, environm grantor and returned to on project ental, surveys. Price is DNR negotiated. Documents are recorded, final title policy Documents are prepared an Check is issued and issued, entered into entered into the signature and closing completed GIS, sent to State approval process Land Office Petition Local Government Finance to remove from tax rolls
  • 73. Projects Proposed by Division IHT Project Distribution State Parks 9% Forestry 25% Nature Preserves 42% Outdoor Rec Fish & Wildlife Historic Sites 14% Nature Preserves Historic Sites State Parks Outdoor Rec 4% Forestry 6% Fish & Wildlife
  • 74. Acres Acquired by Division 1996-2007 % Acreage Totals by Division Outdoor Recreation Forestry 2% 19% Historic Sites Fish & Wildlife 2% State Parks Nature Preserves Fish & Wildlife Historic Sites 53% Forestry Nature Preserves Outdoor Recreation 16% State Parks 8%
  • 75. Accomplishments  Protected 51,658 acres since inception  Projects in 56 Counties  345 completed projects  #1 selling vanity plate every year Ongoing challenges  Funding  Payment in lieu of taxes

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Mineland Reclamation 30%Env. Programs 8%Timber 25%Windbreak 20%Wildlife 15%A. Day 2%
  2. *estimated
  3. Capital funding is major funding mechanism for forest restoration activities on State ForestsOver 4,700 acres of forest restoration work on Indiana’s State Forests was completed in 2010. This work positions these forests for continued health and productivity, providing jobs, wood products and other forest benefits for Hoosiers today and tomorrow. Primary work included reforestation of retired agricultural fields (117 acres), control of invasive plant species (403 acres), prescribed fires, timber stand improvements (3,996 acres) and wildlife habitat activity (213 acres).
  4. Maintaining a wide variety of forest types, size classes and structure creates diversehabitat conditions which can support an equally diverse array of native flora and fauna. Prior to European settlement, the diversity of Indiana’s forests was maintained by a combination of natural disturbance events and Native American activities. These early events, such as landscape-scale wildfires, wind events, and small-scale clearing for agriculture created a patchwork forest of various size and age classes. This variety of forest conditions is the foundation of the wide range of diversity of plants and animals found in Indiana’s forests today. Many of these landscape scale events have been eliminated or altered in today’s Indiana forests. Carefully planned and executed timber harvests are used to bring back the positive effects of these earlier events to our forests while managing against the unacceptable negative aspects.The Continuous Forest Inventory program established a good number research plots in each State Forest that are measured every 5 years to track forest changes and sustainability issues.The HEE Hoosier Ecosystem Expirement established research study areas at MoRgan Monroe and Yellowwood State forests to study forest interactions, species diversity, and particular species in detail under several land management regimes. This long term project is partnering with several universities and is intended to continue for 100 years. State Forests provide ideal study areas due to size and activity as working forests.
  5. American Chestnut was wiped out in the early 1910’s by the Chestnut Blights. Genetic researchers are only a few years away from developing blight resistant strains that could help return this species to Indiana.Forestry’s Yellowwood Lake in Brown County and Starve Hollow Lake in Jackson county have sediment removal projects completed or underway.For nearly a decade, management activities on State Forest properties have been conducted in accordance with a series of special guidelines and strategies designed to protect the federally endangered Indiana bat and its habitat. Management guidelines and strategies address various habitat requirements throughout the year, and include vital protection measures for the caves where bats hibernate through the winter and maternity roosts where females and their young find cover during the summer. To further complement the DoF’s efforts to protect Indiana bat habitat on State Forests, a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) is currently being developed in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). An HCP is a legally binding agreement between the USFWS and either a private entity or a state that specifies conservation measures that will be implemented to minimize and mitigate harm to threatened or endangered species. In exchange for the HCP, the USFWS can issue a permit that would allow a landowner to proceed with an activity that is legal in all other respects but results in the incidental taking of a listed species. Once adopted, the DoF’s HCP will be the first ever to have addressed Indiana bat management concerns on an actively managed forest, providing a positive model for other states, natural resource agencies, and forest managers.The DoF recently developed a draft Environmental Assessment to evaluate the possible short- and long-term habitat impacts from the maximum management intensity necessary to maintain the current proportion of oak-hickory forest across the State Forest system. Researchers, land managers, and conservationists agree, maintaining the oak-hickory forest type throughout the Central Hardwood region is of critical importance to the native wildlife species found here, and the DoF believes future management should emphasize the preservation of this essential, yet threatened, forest type. The status, habitat requirements, and major threats of each listed species found on State Forests were evaluated to determine possible direct and cumulative impacts. Though the DoF is exempt from completing and Environmental Assessment for each of its forest management activities we took this initiative to better understand potential impacts of such a large system-wide program.The DoF provides substantial support for research on State Forests that investigates issues and questions related to forest management and wildlife conservation. Among the species of greatest conservation need that are currently being studied on State Forests: the state endangered cerulean warbler and numerous other neotropical migrant bird species, Indiana bats and other forest bat species, timber rattlesnakes, and box turtles. Recent past research on forest bats, including the federally endangered Indiana bat, has provided a better understanding of what species can be found on State Forests and which habitats are used most often by bats. Research on wildlife populations and habitat is critical for effective management and conservation; the DoF recognizes this need and dedicates a significant proportion of timber sale revenue towards such research efforts
  6. In July 2010, the Classified Forest Program and the Classified Wildlife Habitat Program merged to create the Classified Forest &amp; Wildlands Program. The Classified Wildlife Habitat Program brought over 90,340 acres to the combined program.
  7. Fire Operations*State Lands – Primary suppression response with local fire departments on state owned lands including suppression, holding, mop-up and rehab responsibilities.*Private lands – Keep fires small… Protection of Indiana’s natural and cultural resources from the devastating effect of wildfire.*Partner Agencies - Maintain reciprical assistance agreements for fire suppression with federal agencies also providing fire suppression including Big Oaks NWR, Hoosier NF and Indiana Dunes National LakeshoreTechnical Assistance is provided to fire departments remotely addressing suppression techniques, smoke management and equipment use.Predictive Services – Seasonal outlooks and forecasts are generated for use by departmental, rural fire personnel and the Indiana Department of Homeland Security.Close coodination with partners regarding bans on open burning. Integral partner of the Indiana Drought Task Force providing fire behavior, fuels and fire severity input.
  8. Ecological burning is one of the most cost-effective methods utilized for maintaining habitat. Additionally, it is a necessary element in sustaining the fire dependent ecosystems found within the state including some forests, savannas, prairies and wetland complexes.Fire utilized to reduce fuels, especially heavy fuels, has proven effective in reducing the severity of fire and associated real costs when wildfire does strike.
  9. Indiana has a unique approach to managing the State’s Wildland Fire Program. Michigan, Ohio and Kentucky maintain higher levels of operational fire staffing and support personnel within their respective programs. Some comparison can be made to Illinois, however that program has been growing steadily over the last several years. All states work closely with local level fire personnel (rural &amp; volunteer), however they do not maintain the level of dependence that Indiana does. Indiana does keep the overall cost of the program to a minimum, however a need for growth is evident considering increasing needs, incident complexity, preparedness levels, etc.