14 19

ISSN: 2277 – 9043
International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Electronics Engineering
Volume 1, Issue 5, July 2012

SURVEY OF ENERGY EFFICIENT
MULTICAST ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN
MANET
Ranjeet Jaiswal1, Manish Chand Sahu2, Ankur Mishra3 Sanjay Sharma4
OIST Bhopal1, 3, 4, LNCT Bhopal2
Research scholor1, 2, 3, Asst. Professor3
Ranjeet.jaiswal87@gmail.com1 , manishsahu7710@gmail.com2 , ankur_2469@yahoo.co.in3 ,
Sanjaysharma@oriental.ac.in3

Abstract-- Although establishing correct and efficient disk, system memory (DRAM), keyboard/mouse, CDROM
routes is an important design issue in mobile ad hoc drive, flash drives, I/O subsystem, and the wireless network
networks (MANETs), a more challenging goal is to provide
interface card .
energy efficient routes because mobile nodes’ operation time
A typical example from Toshiba 410 CDT mobile
is the most critical limiting factor. This article surveys and
analyses the energy aware routing protocols proposed for computer demon straits that nearly 36% of power
MANETs. They minimize either the active communication consumed is by the display, 21% by the CPU/memory,
energy required to transmit or receive packets or the inactive 18% by the wireless interface, and 18% by the hard drive.
energy consumed when a mobile node stays idle but listens to Consequently, energy conservation has been largely
the wireless medium for any possible communication requests considered in the hardware design of the mobile terminal
from other nodes. Transmission power control approach and [10] and in components such as CPU, disks, displays, etc.
load distribution approach belong to the former category, Signiﬁcant additional power savings may result by
and sleep/power-down mode approach belongs to the latter
incorporating low-power strategies into the design of
category. While it is not clear that any particular algorithm
network protocols used for data communication.
or a class of algorithms is the best for all scenarios, each
protocol has definite advantages/disadvantages and is well- In ad hoc networks, nodes communicate with each other by
suited for certain situations. The purpose of this paper is to way of radio signals, which are broadcast in nature.
facilitate the research efforts in combining the existing Broadcast is a unique case of multicast, wherein all nodes
solutions to offer a more energy efficient routing mechanism. in the network should get the broadcast message.
Multicasting is a communication process in which the
transmission of packets (message) is initiated by a single
Keywords: Mobile Ad hoc Networks; Multicast user and the message is received by one or more end users
Routing Protocols; Energy Efficiency, Security; Review of the network. Multicasting in wired and wireless
Survey networks has been advantageous and used as a vital
technology in many applications such as audio/ video
I. INTRODUCTION
conferencing, corporate communications, collaborative and
Mobile ad hoc networks comprise freely roaming groupware applications, distance learning, stock quotes,
wireless nodes that cooperatively make up for the distribution of software, news and etc [1]. Under multicast
absence of fixed infrastructure; that is, the nodes communications, a single stream of data can be shared with
themselves support the network functionality. Nodes multiple recipients and data is only duplicated when
transiently associate with their peers that are within the required.
radio connectivity range of their transceiver and
However, it would be a difficult and challenging task to
implicitly agree to assist in provision of the basic
offer energy efficient and reliable multicast routing in
network services. These associations are dynamically
MANETs. It might not be possible to recharge / replace a
created and torn down. Studies show that the signiﬁcant
mobile node that is powered by batteries during a mission.
consumers of power in a typical laptop are the
The inadequate battery lifetime imposes a limitation on the
microprocessor (CPU), liquid crystal display (LCD), hard
network performance. To take full advantage of the lifetime

14

All Rights Reserved © 2012 IJARCSEE

ISSN: 2277 – 9043
of nodes, traffic should be routed in a way that energy These protocols have unique attributes and utilize different
consumption is minimized. In recent years, various energy recovery mechanisms on energy consumption.
efficient multicast routing protocols have been proposed.

Figure: 1 Multicast routing

II. MULTICAST ROUTING PROTOCOL DESIGN: ISSUES Unlike wired networks, MANETs are characterized by scant
AND CHALLENGES capacity caused by the noise and interference inherent in
wireless transmission and multipath fading. Efficient multicast
The particular features of MANETs make the design of a routing protocols are expected to provide a fair number of
multicast routing protocol a challenging one. These protocols control packets transmitted through the network relative to the
must deal with a number of issues, including, but not limited to, number of data packets reaching their destination intact, and
high dynamic topology, limited and variable capacity, limited methods to improve and increase the available capacity need to
energy resources, a high bit error rate, a multihop topology, and be considered.
the hidden terminal problem. The requirements of existing and
future multicast routing protocols and the issues associated with C. Energy Consumption
these protocols that should be taken into consideration are listed
Energy efficiency is an important consideration in such an
in what follows [2, 3, and 6].
environment. Nodes in MANETs rely on limited battery power
A. Topology, Mobility, and Robustness for their energy. Energy-saving techniques aimed at minimizing
the total power consumption of all nodes in the multicast group
In MANETs, nodes are free to move anywhere, anytime, and at (minimize the number of nodes used to establish multicast
different speeds. The random and continued movement of the connectivity, minimize the number of overhead controls, etc.)
nodes leads to a highly dynamic topology, especially in a high- and at maximizing the multicast life span should be considered.
mobility environment. A multicast routing protocol should be
robust enough to react quickly with the mobility of the nodes D. Quality of Service and Resource Management
and should adapt to topological changes in order to avoid
Providing quality of service (QoS) assurance is one of the
dropping a data packet during the multicast session, which
greatest challenges in designing algorithms for MANET
would create a low packet delivery ratio (PDR: the number of no
multicasts. Multicast routing protocols should be able to reserve
duplicate data packets successfully delivered to each destination
different network resources to achieve QoS requirements such
versus the number of data packets supposed to be received at
as, capacity, delay, delay jitter, and packet loss. It is very
each destination). It is very important to minimize control
difficult to meet all QoS requirements at the same time because
overhead while creating and maintaining the multicast group
of the peculiarities of ad hoc networks. Even if this is done, the
topology, especially in an environment with limited capacity.
protocol will be very complex (many routing tables, high control
B. Capacity and Efficiency overhead, high energy consumption, etc.). As a result, doing so
will not be suitable for these networks with their scarce

15


ISSN: 2277 – 9043
resources, and resource management and adaptive QoS methods Ad-hoc Multicast Routing Protocol Utilizing Increasing id-
are more convenient than reservation methods for MANETs. numbers (AMRIS) are proactive multicast routing protocols.
Periodic broadcast of network topology updates are needed to
E. Security and Reliability compute the shortest path from the source to every destination,
which consumes a lot of bandwidth. In Table 3 gives the
Security provisioning is a crucial issue in MANET multicasting
Characteristic comparison of proactive Multicast Routing
due to the broadcast nature of this type of network, the existence
Protocol.
of a wireless medium, and the lack of any centralized
infrastructure. This makes MANETs vulnerable to
eavesdropping, interference, spoofing, and so forth. Multicast
routing protocols should take this into account, especially in
some applications such as military (battlefield) operations,
national crises, and emergency operations. Reliability is
particularly important in multicasting, especially in these
applications, and it becomes more difficult to deliver reliable
data to group members whose topology varies. A reliable
multicasting design depends on the answers of the following
three questions. By who are the errors detected? How are error
Figure: 2 Classification of Multicast routing protocols
messages signalled? How are missing packets retransmitted?
A. Ad-hoc Multicast Routing (AMRoute)
F. Scalability
Ad-hoc Multicast Routing (AMRoute) is a tree based
A multicast routing protocol should be able to provide an
multicast routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks.
acceptable level of service in a network with a large number of
AMRoute creates a multicast shared-tree over mesh. AMRoute
nodes. It is very important to take into account the
relies on the existence of an underlying unicast routing protocol.
nondeterministic characteristics (power and capacity limitations,
AMRoute has two key phases: mesh creation and tree creation.
random mobility, etc.) of the MANET environment in coping
This protocol can be used for networks in which only a set of
with this issue.
nodes supports AMRoute routing function. It is only one logical
(III) CLASSIFICATION OF MULTICAST ROUTING core in the multicast tree, which is responsible for group
PROTOCOLS IN MANET member maintenance and multicast tree creation. In this routing
protocol builds a user- multicast tree, in which only the group
This section describes some of the existing multicast routing members are included; because non-members are not included
protocols used in MANETs. We classify them into three in the tree, the links in the tree are virtual links. In other words,
categories, according to their layers of operation. The categories they are in fact multi-hop IP-in-IP tunnels and AMRoute
are the Proactive Multicast Routing Protocol, Reactive Multicast depends on the underlying unicast routing protocol to deal with
Routing Protocol and Hybrid Multicast Routing Protocols. network dynamics, although it has no privilege for unicast
routing protocols. AMRoute creates an efficient and robust
In this paper, we will classify the proposals that tried to pose shared tree for each group. It helps keep the multicast delivery
general ideas of how applying multicast concept in MANETs. tree unchanged with changes of network topology, as long as
The classification of these proposals will be mentioned under paths between tree members and core nodes exist via mesh
different viewpoints as shown in Figure 2 links. When mobility is present, AMRoute suffers from loop
formation, creates no optimal trees, and requires higher
1. Proactive Multicast Routing Protocols
overhead to assign a new core. Also, AMRoute suffers from a
Conventional routing protocols such as Ad-hoc Multicast single point of failure of the core node.
Routing (AMRoute), Core-Assisted Mesh Protocol (CAMP) and

16


ISSN: 2277 – 9043
B. Ad hoc Multicast Routing Protocol utilizing increasing id- protocol. CAMP modifies this table when a multicast group
numbers (AMRIS) joins or leaves the network. A Multicast Routing Table (MRT)
is based on the Routing Table that contains the set of known
AMRIS [7] is a proactive shared tree based multicast routing groups. Moreover, all member nodes maintain a set of caches
protocol, which is independent of the fundamental unicast that Sender Forwarder Receiver contain previously seen data
routing protocol. In AMRIS, the tree maintenance procedure packet information and unacknowledged membership requests.
operates continuously and locally to ensure a node’s connection The creation and maintenance of meshes are main parts of
to the multicast session delivery tree. In AMRIS, the tree CAMP.
maintenance procedure operates continuously and locally to
ensure a node’s connection to the multicast session delivery tree. AMROUTE AMRIS CAMP
AMRIS is an on-demand protocol that constructs a shared Structure of multicast
delivery tree to support multiple senders and receivers within a routing Tree Tree Mesh
multicast session. AMRIS dynamically assigns every node (on
demand) in a multicast session with an ID number known as Loop Free NO Yes yes

msm-id. The msm-id provides a heuristic height to a node and Dependencey on
the ranking order of msm-id numbers directs the flow of unicasting Routing
Protocols Yes No Yes
datagram in the multicast delivery tree. Every node calculates its
msm-id during the initialization phase, which is initiated by a
special node called S-id. Normally, the S-id is the source node if Scalability Fair Fair Good
there is only one source for the session. Otherwise, the S-id is Comtol Packet flooding Flat Flat Flat
the source node that has the minimum msm-id. The S-id Perodic Message
broadcasts a NEW_SESSION message to its neighbours. When Requirement Yes Yes Yes
a node wants to join the multicast session, it chooses one of its
neighbours which has the smaller msm-id as its parent and send
it a JOIN-REQ message. If the neighbour is in the tree (if the 2. Reactive Multicast Routing Protocols
tree has been built), it answers with a JOIN-ACK message, Traditional routing protocols such as On Demand Multicast
which means the joining is successful; otherwise (when it is the Routing Protocol (ODMRP) and Multicast Ad-hoc on-demand
first time to build the tree), the neighbour forwards JOIN-REQ Distance Vector (MAODV) are Reactive multicast routing
to its own neighbours and waits for the reply, which is repeated protocols. Reactive routing that means discovers the route when
until the JOIN-REQ arrives at an on-tree node or the source. As needed. Reactive routing protocols are well suited for a large-
a result, a delivery tree rooted from the source is formed to scale, narrow-band MANET with moderate or low mobility. In
include all the group members and some relay non-members. Table 4 gives the Characteristic comparison of Reactive
AMRIS repairs the broken links by performing local route repair Multicast Routing Protocol.
without the need for any central controlling node, thereby
reducing the control overhead. A. On-Demand Multicast Routing Protocol (ODMRP)
On-Demand Multicast Routing Protocol (ODMRP) [8] is a
C. Core-Assisted Mesh protocol (CAMP)
reactive mesh based multicast routing protocol. ODMRP is
Core-Assisted Mesh protocol (CAMP) [10] is a proactive not only a multicast routing protocol, but also provides unicast
multicast routing protocol based on shared Meshes-The mesh routing capability. The source establishes and maintains group
structure provides at least one path from each source to each membership and multicast mesh on demand if it needs to send
receiver in the multicast group. CAMP relies on an underlying data packets to the multicast group, which is somewhat similar
unicast protocol which can provide correct distances to all to MAODV. A set of nodes, which is called forwarding group,
destinations within finite time. Every node maintains a Routing participate in forwarding data packets among group members.
Table (RT) that is created by the underlying unicast routing All the states in ODMRP are soft states, which are refreshed by
the control messages mentioned above or data packets, which

17


ISSN: 2277 – 9043
achieves higher robustness. ODMRP uses a forwarding group to maintain the sequence number. The group leader is by default
concept for multicast packet transmission, in which each the first node joining the group, but could also be another node
multicast group G is associated with a forwarding group (FG). when the first node leaves the group. The main drawbacks of
Nodes in FG are in charge of forwarding multicast packets of MAODV are long delays and high overheads associated with
group G. In a multicast group of ODMRP, the source manages fixing broken links in conditions of high mobility and traffic
the group membership, establishes and updates the multicast load. Also, it has a low packet delivery ratio in scenarios with
routes on demand. Like reactive unicast routing protocols, high mobility, large numbers of members, or a high traffic load.
ODMPR comprises two main phases: the request phase and the Because of its dependence on AODV, MAODV is not flexible.
reply phase. When a multicast source has a packet to send but it Finally, it suffers from a single point of failure, which is the
has no routing and group membership information, it floods a multicast group leader.
Join Request packet to the entire network. Join Request packets
ODMRP MAODV
are member-advertising packets with piggybacked data payload.
When a node receives a non-duplicate JOIN Request, it stores Multicast delivery Mesh Core based tree
the upstream node ID in its routing table and rebroadcasts the structure
packet. When the JOIN Request packet reaches a multicast Loop free Yes Yes
receiver, the receiver refreshes or creates an entry for the source Periodic message Yes No
in Member Table and broadcasts JOIN TABLE packets requirement
periodically to its neighbours. When a node receives a JOIN
TABLE packet, it checks each entry of the table to find out if Routing hierarchy Flat Flat
there is an entry in the table whose next node ID field matches
its ID. If there is a match, the node recognizes that it is on the scalability Fare Fare
path to the source, thus it is part of the forwarding group. Then it
sets the FG_FLAG and broadcasts its own JOIN TABLE built
3. Hybrid Multicast Routing Protocols
upon matched entries. Consequently, each member of a
Traditional routing protocol such as Optimized Polymorphic
forwarding group propagates the JOIN TABLE packets until the
Hybrid Multicast Routing Protocol (OPHMR) is the Hybrid
multicast source is reached via the shortest path. This process
multicast routing protocol. Hybrid routing protocol attempts to
constructs (or updates) the routes from sources to receivers and
discover balance between the two such as proactive for
builds a mesh of nodes, the forwarding group.
neighbourhood, reactive for far away.
B. Multicast Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector
1. Optimized Polymorphic Hybrid Multicast Routing
(MAODV) Multicast operation of Ad-hoc On-demand Distance
Protocol (OPHMR)
Vector (MAODV) [10] is a reactive tree-based multicast routing
This protocol [9] is invested with different operational modes
protocol. MAODV is an extension of the unicast routing
that are either proactive or reactive based on a MN’s power
protocol Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV). Using
remainder, mobility level, and vicinity density level. It attempts
MAODV, all nodes in the network maintain local connectivity
to address the issues of power efficiency, latency, and protocol
by broadcasting “Hello” messages with TTL set to one. Every
overhead in an adaptive manner. OPHMR’s reactive behaviour
node maintains three tables, a Routing
is based on the On-Demand Multicast Routing Protocol
Table (RT), a Multicast Routing Table (MRT) and a Request
(ODMRP). It’s relatively simplistic. It generates on-demand
Table. RT stores routing information and has the same
route paths for multicast message requests. OPHMR’s proactive
function as in AODV. In unicast routing operations, every
behaviour is based on the Multicast Zone Routing (MZR)
destination has a unique sequence number. Likewise every
protocol. It builds a zone around each Mobile Node (in hops)
multicast group also has a sequence number to indicate the
and periodically sends updates within each defined zone. For
freshness of the multicast routing information.
added efficiency, OPHMR utilizes an optimizing scheme
Thus, one and only one group leader is elected to broadcast
adapted from the Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR)
periodical GROUP HELLO messages throughout the MANET

18


ISSN: 2277 – 9043
protocol. It used to decrease the amount of control overhead that Systems, 2004.
[6]. M.C.C. De, H. Gossain, D.P. Agrawal, Multicast over Wireless
is produced. OPHMR is, after a very lengthy period of time,
Mobile Ad-hoc Networks: Present and Future Directions, IEEE
able to extend battery life and enhance the survivability of the Network, 52–59, 2003.
mobile ad hoc nodes. As a result, it decreases the end-to-end [7]. J. G. Jetcheva and D. B. Johnson: Adaptive Demand-Driven
delay and increases the packet delivery ratio. Multicast Routing in Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks,
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Mobile
andAd-hoc Networking & Computing (MobiHOC), pages 33 - 44,
IV. CONCLUSION Long Beach, CA, October 2001.
[8]. M. Maleki and M. Pedram, Lifetime-Aware Multicast Routing in
A mobile ad hoc network (MANET) consists of autonomous Wireless Ad hoc Networks, Proceedings of IEEE Wireless
Communications and Networking Conference, 2004.
mobile nodes, each of which communicates directly with the
[9]. Adel Ben Mnaouer, Lei Chen, Chuan Heng Foh, Juki Wirawan
nodes within its wireless range or indirectly with other nodes in Tantra, "OPHMR: An Optimized Polymorphic Hybrid Multicast
a network. In order to facilitate secure and reliable Routing Protocol for MANET," IEEE Transactions on Mobile
communication within a MANET, an efficient routing protocol Computing, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 551-562, May 2007,
doi:10.1109/TMC.2007.1030
is required to discover routes between mobile nodes. The field
[10]. CHRISTINE E. JONES, KRISHNA M. SIVALINGAM,
of MNAET is rapidly growing due to the many advantages and PRATHIMA AGRAWAL and JYH CHENG CHEN, “A Survey of
different application areas. Energy efficiency and security are Energy Efficient Network Protocols for Wireless Networks”,
some challenges faced in MANETs, especially in designing a Wireless Networks 7, 343–358, 2001Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Manufactured in The Netherlands.
routing protocol. In this paper, we surveyed a number of energy
[11]. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J.J. Madruga, E.L. Dept. of Comput. Eng.,
efficient multicast routing International California Univ., Santa Cruz, CA, “The core-assisted mesh 11] C. C.
protocols and secure multicast routing protocols. In many cases, Chiang, M. Gerla, and L. Zhang, “Adaptive shared tree multicast in
it is difficult to compare these protocols with each other directly mobile wireless networks,” Proceeding of GLOBECOM, pp. 1817–
1822, November1998. Protocol” 06 August 2002.
since each protocol has a different goal with different
assumptions and employs mechanisms to achieve the goal.
According to the study, these protocols have different strengths
and drawbacks. A multicast protocol can hardly satisfy all
requirements. In other words, one routing protocol cannot be a
solution for all energy efficient and security issues that are faced
in MANETs, but rather each protocol is designed to provide the
maximum possible requirements, according to certain required
scenarios.
V. REFERENCES

[1]. X. Chen, J. Wu, Multicasting Techniques in Mobile Ad-hoc
Networks, Computer Science Department, South-west Texas State
University, San Marcos, The Handbook of Ad-hoc Wireless
Networks (2003) pp. 25–40.
[2]. M. Mohammed, Energy Efficient Location Aided Routing Protocol
for Wireless MANETs, International Journal of Computer Science
and Information Security, vol. 4, 2009.
[3]. M. Cheng, J. Shun, M. Min, Y. Li and W. Wu, Energy-Efficient
Broadcast and Multicast Routing in Multihop Ad Hoc Wireless
Networks, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 6,
no. 2, pp. 213–223, 2006.
[4]. L Junhai, X Liu, Y Danxia, Research on Multicast Routing Protocols
for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks Computer Networks – Elsevier, 2008.
[5]. R. Vaishampayan, J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, Energy Efficient and
Robust Multicast Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, Proceedings
of the IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor

19


14 19

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (16)

Similar to 14 19

Similar to 14 19 (20)

More from Ijarcsee Journal

More from Ijarcsee Journal (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

14 19