SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Scoring method
                                                                           Bachman & Palmer



                                                 Defining the criteria for what constitutes
                One where the score is
                                                 ‘successful completition’
                defined as the number of
                test     tasks   successfully
                completed, so that we count      Determining whether responses will be
                and add up the number of         scored as right or wrong, or with varying
                correct responses.               degrees of correctness.

                                                 Language ability consists of multiple
 Two main                                        components, and this involves separate,
approaches                                       analytic, ratings for each of the specific
                                                 components included in the contruct
                Define several levels on one
                                                 definition.
                or more rating scales of
                language ability, and then to
                                                 Scale levels should be criterion
                rate responses to test tasks
                                                 referenced, with the lowest level on our
                in terms of these scales.
                                                 rating scales defined as ‘no evidence of’
                                                 the abililty and the highest level as
                                                 ‘evidence of mastery of’ the ability.

                Defining rating scales in terms of the areas of language ability to be
Specifying      assessed.
the scoring
  method        Determining the number of levels of ability on the different scales.

                                          Compensatory
                Componential rating                                   Both allow profiles
   Rating
                scale                     Non-Compensatory            of language ability
   scales
                                                                      to be reported
                Analytic rating scale
                Demand on resources
                                          Preparing raters
Anticipatin
                       Causes of          Obtaining a sufficient number of ratings
g problems
                     inconsistency
                                          Estimating the degree of consistency of ratings

                                          Initial specifications
                The development of a
                   scoring method is
  Trialing                                Try-out
                 iterative and cycling.
                                          Analysis
                                          Revision




Andrea Castillo Bilchi

More Related Content

Similar to Summary (chart)

Characteristics of a good test
Characteristics of a good testCharacteristics of a good test
Characteristics of a good testBoyet Aluan
 
The Scientific Method
The Scientific MethodThe Scientific Method
The Scientific Methodmmj24
 
validity its types and importance
validity its types and importancevalidity its types and importance
validity its types and importanceIerine Joy Caserial
 
Chapter 6 - Standardized Measurement & Assessment
Chapter 6 - Standardized Measurement & AssessmentChapter 6 - Standardized Measurement & Assessment
Chapter 6 - Standardized Measurement & Assessmentkjhatzi
 
Rating scales Chapter 7 by Ahmet YUSUF
Rating scales Chapter 7  by Ahmet YUSUFRating scales Chapter 7  by Ahmet YUSUF
Rating scales Chapter 7 by Ahmet YUSUFأحمد يوسف
 
Intro to rubric
Intro to rubricIntro to rubric
Intro to rubricsaitjbp
 
Vi perfm-appraisal[1]
Vi perfm-appraisal[1]Vi perfm-appraisal[1]
Vi perfm-appraisal[1]komporg4s
 
Maryland SLOs: Quality Assurance
Maryland SLOs: Quality AssuranceMaryland SLOs: Quality Assurance
Maryland SLOs: Quality AssuranceKimberly Fleming
 
Building your assessments to meet course objectives -detc
Building your assessments to meet course objectives -detcBuilding your assessments to meet course objectives -detc
Building your assessments to meet course objectives -detcostromae
 
Training need analysis timetable
Training need analysis timetableTraining need analysis timetable
Training need analysis timetableHj Arriffin Mansor
 
Australian Animals
Australian AnimalsAustralian Animals
Australian Animalsrobynscott
 
Web quest-template-pdf-format1371
Web quest-template-pdf-format1371Web quest-template-pdf-format1371
Web quest-template-pdf-format1371robynscott
 

Similar to Summary (chart) (18)

Scoring Method (C-Map)
Scoring Method (C-Map)Scoring Method (C-Map)
Scoring Method (C-Map)
 
Characteristics of a good test
Characteristics of a good testCharacteristics of a good test
Characteristics of a good test
 
The Scientific Method
The Scientific MethodThe Scientific Method
The Scientific Method
 
validity its types and importance
validity its types and importancevalidity its types and importance
validity its types and importance
 
Chapter 6 - Standardized Measurement & Assessment
Chapter 6 - Standardized Measurement & AssessmentChapter 6 - Standardized Measurement & Assessment
Chapter 6 - Standardized Measurement & Assessment
 
Assessment
AssessmentAssessment
Assessment
 
Rating scales Chapter 7 by Ahmet YUSUF
Rating scales Chapter 7  by Ahmet YUSUFRating scales Chapter 7  by Ahmet YUSUF
Rating scales Chapter 7 by Ahmet YUSUF
 
Rubrics ppt
Rubrics pptRubrics ppt
Rubrics ppt
 
Intro to rubric
Intro to rubricIntro to rubric
Intro to rubric
 
Grading Ppt
Grading PptGrading Ppt
Grading Ppt
 
Command Terms
Command TermsCommand Terms
Command Terms
 
Wordyslides withnotes amlit_btsngradeslides
Wordyslides withnotes amlit_btsngradeslidesWordyslides withnotes amlit_btsngradeslides
Wordyslides withnotes amlit_btsngradeslides
 
Vi perfm-appraisal[1]
Vi perfm-appraisal[1]Vi perfm-appraisal[1]
Vi perfm-appraisal[1]
 
Maryland SLOs: Quality Assurance
Maryland SLOs: Quality AssuranceMaryland SLOs: Quality Assurance
Maryland SLOs: Quality Assurance
 
Building your assessments to meet course objectives -detc
Building your assessments to meet course objectives -detcBuilding your assessments to meet course objectives -detc
Building your assessments to meet course objectives -detc
 
Training need analysis timetable
Training need analysis timetableTraining need analysis timetable
Training need analysis timetable
 
Australian Animals
Australian AnimalsAustralian Animals
Australian Animals
 
Web quest-template-pdf-format1371
Web quest-template-pdf-format1371Web quest-template-pdf-format1371
Web quest-template-pdf-format1371
 

More from Diego ElCretino

Unit II Technology and Inventions Inglés IAPB 2014
Unit II Technology and Inventions Inglés IAPB 2014Unit II Technology and Inventions Inglés IAPB 2014
Unit II Technology and Inventions Inglés IAPB 2014Diego ElCretino
 
Is TV a danger? CEIA MASS 2013
Is TV a danger? CEIA MASS 2013Is TV a danger? CEIA MASS 2013
Is TV a danger? CEIA MASS 2013Diego ElCretino
 
Wth is Facebook? CEIA MASS 2013
Wth is Facebook? CEIA MASS 2013Wth is Facebook? CEIA MASS 2013
Wth is Facebook? CEIA MASS 2013Diego ElCretino
 
Cognates & False Cognates CEIA MASS 2013
Cognates & False Cognates CEIA MASS 2013Cognates & False Cognates CEIA MASS 2013
Cognates & False Cognates CEIA MASS 2013Diego ElCretino
 
Nemo Phrasal Verbs Tutorial
Nemo Phrasal Verbs TutorialNemo Phrasal Verbs Tutorial
Nemo Phrasal Verbs TutorialDiego ElCretino
 
Proyecto de Mejoramiento Educativo
Proyecto de Mejoramiento EducativoProyecto de Mejoramiento Educativo
Proyecto de Mejoramiento EducativoDiego ElCretino
 
Journal of Communication Disorders
Journal of Communication DisordersJournal of Communication Disorders
Journal of Communication DisordersDiego ElCretino
 
SDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Singing
SDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Singing SDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Singing
SDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Singing Diego ElCretino
 
If i were a boy beyoncé
If i were a boy beyoncéIf i were a boy beyoncé
If i were a boy beyoncéDiego ElCretino
 
Listening Test 2 Module 2 Unit III Entertainment
Listening Test 2 Module 2 Unit III EntertainmentListening Test 2 Module 2 Unit III Entertainment
Listening Test 2 Module 2 Unit III EntertainmentDiego ElCretino
 
SDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Toy Story
SDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Toy StorySDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Toy Story
SDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Toy StoryDiego ElCretino
 
PPT sample listening class
PPT sample listening classPPT sample listening class
PPT sample listening classDiego ElCretino
 

More from Diego ElCretino (20)

Ecosystem
EcosystemEcosystem
Ecosystem
 
Old Traditional Games
Old Traditional GamesOld Traditional Games
Old Traditional Games
 
Taxonomia Marzano
Taxonomia MarzanoTaxonomia Marzano
Taxonomia Marzano
 
Unit II Technology and Inventions Inglés IAPB 2014
Unit II Technology and Inventions Inglés IAPB 2014Unit II Technology and Inventions Inglés IAPB 2014
Unit II Technology and Inventions Inglés IAPB 2014
 
Is TV a danger? CEIA MASS 2013
Is TV a danger? CEIA MASS 2013Is TV a danger? CEIA MASS 2013
Is TV a danger? CEIA MASS 2013
 
Task (Facebook)
Task (Facebook)Task (Facebook)
Task (Facebook)
 
Wth is Facebook? CEIA MASS 2013
Wth is Facebook? CEIA MASS 2013Wth is Facebook? CEIA MASS 2013
Wth is Facebook? CEIA MASS 2013
 
Cognates & False Cognates CEIA MASS 2013
Cognates & False Cognates CEIA MASS 2013Cognates & False Cognates CEIA MASS 2013
Cognates & False Cognates CEIA MASS 2013
 
In Magazine
In MagazineIn Magazine
In Magazine
 
Nemo Phrasal Verbs Tutorial
Nemo Phrasal Verbs TutorialNemo Phrasal Verbs Tutorial
Nemo Phrasal Verbs Tutorial
 
Proyecto de Mejoramiento Educativo
Proyecto de Mejoramiento EducativoProyecto de Mejoramiento Educativo
Proyecto de Mejoramiento Educativo
 
Journal of Communication Disorders
Journal of Communication DisordersJournal of Communication Disorders
Journal of Communication Disorders
 
Unit plan 2011
Unit plan 2011Unit plan 2011
Unit plan 2011
 
SDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Singing
SDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Singing SDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Singing
SDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Singing
 
If i were a boy lyrics
If i were a boy lyricsIf i were a boy lyrics
If i were a boy lyrics
 
If i were a boy beyoncé
If i were a boy beyoncéIf i were a boy beyoncé
If i were a boy beyoncé
 
Listening Test 2 Module 2 Unit III Entertainment
Listening Test 2 Module 2 Unit III EntertainmentListening Test 2 Module 2 Unit III Entertainment
Listening Test 2 Module 2 Unit III Entertainment
 
SDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Toy Story
SDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Toy StorySDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Toy Story
SDL Listening Module 2 Unit 3 Toy Story
 
PPT sample listening class
PPT sample listening classPPT sample listening class
PPT sample listening class
 
Unit Plan sample PTP
Unit Plan sample PTPUnit Plan sample PTP
Unit Plan sample PTP
 

Summary (chart)

  • 1. Scoring method Bachman & Palmer Defining the criteria for what constitutes One where the score is ‘successful completition’ defined as the number of test tasks successfully completed, so that we count Determining whether responses will be and add up the number of scored as right or wrong, or with varying correct responses. degrees of correctness. Language ability consists of multiple Two main components, and this involves separate, approaches analytic, ratings for each of the specific components included in the contruct Define several levels on one definition. or more rating scales of language ability, and then to Scale levels should be criterion rate responses to test tasks referenced, with the lowest level on our in terms of these scales. rating scales defined as ‘no evidence of’ the abililty and the highest level as ‘evidence of mastery of’ the ability. Defining rating scales in terms of the areas of language ability to be Specifying assessed. the scoring method Determining the number of levels of ability on the different scales. Compensatory Componential rating Both allow profiles Rating scale Non-Compensatory of language ability scales to be reported Analytic rating scale Demand on resources Preparing raters Anticipatin Causes of Obtaining a sufficient number of ratings g problems inconsistency Estimating the degree of consistency of ratings Initial specifications The development of a scoring method is Trialing Try-out iterative and cycling. Analysis Revision Andrea Castillo Bilchi