Samuel Benin
POLICY SEMINAR
Virtual Event - The political economy of COVID-19: Impacts on agriculture and food policies
OCT 22, 2020 - 08:30 AM TO 10:00 AM EDT
call girls in moti bagh DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
Impact of COVID-19 on the fiscal space for agricultural transformation in Africa
1. Samuel Benin
Deputy Division Director, Africa Regional Office, IFPRI
Virtual event on:
The political economy of COVID-19:
Impacts on agriculture and food policies
October 22, 2020
Impact of COVID-19 on the fiscal space
for agricultural transformation in Africa
2. Fiscal policies in response to the Covid-19 pandemic in Africa
52
15
20
35
18
6
13
22 18
3
37
15 16
4
0
11
22
33
44
55
Health
Agriculture
Other
Taxes,licenses,etc.
Loans
Tax-deductible
donations
Informalsubsector
Importtax
VAT
Prices
Vulnerable
Laidoff
Incometax/Utilities
Pension
Sector Businesses/Private
sector
Markets Households
Fig 1. Covid-19 response fiscal policies: targets and
instruments (number of African countries)
Not stated; 63%Reprioritize (incl.
defer debt); 23%
Contingency
fund; 8%
Loans; 6%
Fig 2. Sources of financing Covid-19
response policies (% of African countries)
African countries using different fiscal policies to deal with
the health effects and socioeconomic impacts (Fig 1).
The cost of the policies is estimated at 1% of GDP ( US$32
billion) for African countries.
While few of the countries have stated how these will be
financed (Fig 2); the fiscal space seems limited (Fig 3).
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Ethiopia
Egypt
Ghana
Guinea-Bissau
Mauritius
Senegal
SouthAfrica
Tunisia
LIDCs
EMs
G20
AEs
Fig 3. Fiscal space for Covid-19 response
policies, selected African countries and
regional averages (% of GDP)
Additional spending
and forgone revenue
Loans, equities, and
guarantees
Data sources: Based on IMF covid-19 policy tracker and emergency financial assistance by
region (IMF 2000 https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19)
3. Concern for CAADP and Africa’s agricultural transformation
Fiscal space in Africa improved in 2000-2007; but has shrunk since the
global financial crisis (Fig 4).
Interest payments has been rising rapidly since the global financial
crisis (6%/yr) and squeezing public investment in especially agriculture
and infrastructure (Fig 5).
Spending on agriculture is already too low (< 1% of GDP/yr).
CAADP = Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme
Data sources: Based on GFS (IMF 2020), SPEED (IFPRI 2020), WDI (World Bank 2020), Kose et al.
(2020: http://www.worldbank.org/en/research/brief/fiscal-space), and BR reports (AUC 2018, 2020).
57
92 79 92 94 100
43
8 21 8 6
0
1st BR 2nd BR 1st BR 2nd BR 1st BR 2nd BR
Overall Government
agriculture
expenditure
(indicator 2.1i)
Enhancing
agricultural
investment
(theme 2)
Fig 6: CAADP Biennial Review (BR):
progress in achieving goals of the
Malabo Declaration (% of countries)
Not-on-track
On track
Will further retard progress in CAADP:
Fewer countries on-track overall
None on-track for the targets on
enhancing agricultural investment
1
6
11
16
21
0
20
40
60
80
2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018
Index
%ofGDP
Fig 4: Fiscal space since 2000
(average for Africa)
General government gross debt, % of GDP
Total external debt stocks, % of GDP
Long-term debt ratings, index from 1-21
2.1 3.0 1.9
5.7
6.4
6.4
3.0
2.0 2.5
11.1 12.0 14.1
2000-2006 2007-2009 2010-2017
Fig 5: Government
expenditure (% of GDP)
Other functions Interest
Social Infrastructure, etc.
Agriculture
4. Increasing fiscal space and building back better
Increasing efficiency spending. Critical
investments (e.g. infrastructure) to:
Mitigate or reduce impacts of shocks
Facilitate more effective and efficient
responses to shocks
Increasing ODA and refocusing its purpose (Fig 7)
Broadening the revenue base and increasing
efficiency in revenue collection:
Including more of informal sector for greater
growth prospects
More progressive taxes
Institutionalizing fiscal rules and stabilization
funds for flexibility in managing shocks
Using medium-term expenditure frameworks for
credibility and transparency in budgeting
Data sources: Based on GFS (IMF 2020), CRS (OECD 2020), and
WDI (World Bank 2020)
0
3
6
9
12
0
2
4
6
8
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
%oftotalODA
%ofGDP
Fig 7: ODA to Africa
Other ODA,
% of GDP
Emergency
response
ODA, % of
GDP
Emergency
response
ODA, % of
total ODA