SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 12
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Electrophysiological measures of low-level vision reveal
spatial processing deficits and hemispheric asymmetry in
autism spectrum disorder
Francesca Pei # $
Department of Psychology, Stanford University,
Stanford, CA, USA
Stanford Autism Center at Packard Children’s Hospital,
Department of Psychiatric, School of Medicine, Stanford
University, Stanford, CA, USA
Stefano Baldassi # $
Department of Psychology, Stanford University,
Stanford, CA, USA
Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology,
and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Anthony M. Norcia # $
Department of Psychology, Stanford University,
Stanford, CA, USA
There is accumulating evidence from electrophysiological
studies that low-level visual processing is atypical in
individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs).
Abnormalities in early stages of sensory processing are of
interest because they could lead to downstream
functional deficits in social or cognitive domains. Using
steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs), we studied
how well spatial information is transmitted over a wide
range of spatial frequencies (2–30 cycles/deg), including
those at the limit of visibility (visual acuity). SSVEPs were
recorded over 128 channels in 16 ASD participants
between 5 and 17 years old and 17 age-matched,
neurotypical (NT) participants. We observed a selective
reduction of the amplitude of the SSVEP second harmonic
pattern reversal response between 5 and 17 cycles/deg.
Responses measured at the fourth harmonic were normal
at all spatial frequencies tested, as were responses at the
lowest and highest spatial frequencies at the second
harmonic. The reduction of second harmonic responses
occurred preferentially over right occipital electrodes.
Because response abnormalities are restricted to a
specific response harmonic and to specific ranges of
spatial frequency, we can rule out nonspecific differences
between the ASD participants and the NT controls. This
particular pattern of loss, combined with the observed
exaggeration of the loss over the right hemisphere,
suggests that a highly specific neural substrate early in the
visual pathway is compromised in ASD.
Introduction
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevel-
opmental disorder characterized by impairment of
communication skills and social interaction and by
repetitive patterns of stereotyped behaviors. In addition
to these core deficits, a variety of sensory abnormalities
have been described in ASD patients since the
discovery of the disorder. Early reports noted that the
response to sensory stimuli in ASD was similar to that
in deaf–blind children (Kanner, 1943; Wing, 1969).
Later studies reported a high rate of sensory abnor-
malities, mostly on the basis of questionnaires admin-
istered to the parents (Baranek, David, Poe, Stone, &
Watson, 2006; Klintwall et al., 2011). Such abnormal-
ities have been described across all sensory domains
(Marco, Hinkley, Hill, & Nagarajan, 2011). One study
(Leekam, Nieto, Libby, Wing, & Gould, 2007) reported
that up to 90% of individuals with ASD show tactile,
auditory, or visual hypersensitivity or hyposensitivity.
Because sensory symptoms and abnormal reactions to
sensory stimuli are so common, they are now part of
the diagnostic criteria for ASD in the fifth edition of
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(American Psychiatric Association, 2000a).
Citation: Pei, F., Baldassi, S., & Norcia, A. M. (2014). Electrophysiological measures of low-level vision reveal spatial processing
deficits and hemispheric asymmetry in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Vision, 14(11):3, 1–12, http://www.journalofvision.
org/content/14/11/3, doi:10.1167/14.11.3.
Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 1http://www.journalofvision.org/content/14/11/3
doi: 10.1167/14.11.3 ISSN 1534-7362 Ó 2014 ARVOReceived November 3, 2013; published September 5, 2014
The high prevalence of sensory disturbances in ASDs
has led to the suggestion that at least some of the high-
level deficits in social interaction and communication in
ASDs could be explained in terms of downstream
consequences of lower-level sensory and perceptual
abnormalities (Behrmann et al., 2006; Caron, Mottron,
Berthiaume, & Dawson, 2006). Abnormal visual
perception in ASDs on performance-based assessment
was first demonstrated as a local versus global feature-
integration bias (Happe, 1996; Mottron & Belleville,
1993; Pei et al., 2009; Plaisted, O’Riordan, & Baron-
Cohen, 1998; Plaisted, Swettenham, & Rees, 1999).
People with ASD showed a strong bias for details and
local characteristics of the task in tests such as the
embedded figure test (Jolliffe & Baron-Cohen, 1997;
Shah & Frith, 1983) or the block design subtest of the
Wechsler intelligence quotient (IQ) battery (Shah &
Frith, 1983; Venter, Lord, & Schopler, 1992). These
reports of superior visual performance in ASD
contributed to the development of the weak central
coherence hypothesis (Frith, 1989) and the enhanced
perceptual functioning hypothesis (Mottron et al.,
2006) of ASD. The local bias effect led researchers to
focus on visual search, a task that ASD observers seem
to perform with less or no influence of the number of
distractors (O’Riordan & Passetti, 2006; O’Riordan,
Plaisted, Driver, & Baron-Cohen, 2001), possibly due
to diminished peripheral visual crowding (Baldassi et
al., 2009) that in turn fits with the difficulties ASD
observers experience in visual integration tasks. How-
ever, it has been argued that the deficit of global form
processing in autism is far from understood because of
a lack of studies using stimuli that control for the
presence of low spatial frequency structure in the test
material (Dakin & Frith, 2005).
Subsequent research (Milne et al., 2002, 2006;
Pellicano, Gibson, Maybery, Durkin, & Badcock, 2005;
Spencer et al., 2000) found elevated thresholds in ASD
on coherent motion tasks in which sensitivity to motion
is determined on the basis of the fraction of coherently
moving dots needed by the observer to discriminate the
direction of motion. Because motion direction cannot
be estimated on the basis of small regions of a coherent
motion display, this task is believed to tap global
processing mechanisms in the extrastriate cortex
(Newsome & Pare, 1988; Williams & Sekuler, 1984).
Bertone, Mottron, Jelenic, and Faubert (2003) de-
scribed deficits in second-order motion that were
interpreted as a deficit in the perception of complex
stimuli rather than as a deficit in the early detector
along the magnocellular stream. However, direction
discrimination thresholds are elevated for moving
gratings in ASD participants and their siblings,
suggesting that lower-level motion processing is, in fact
abnormal and may be a genetically mediated risk factor
for ASD (Koh, Milne, & Dobkins, 2010a).
The integrity of low-level spatial mechanisms that
feed higher-order visual processes has been less well
studied. The spatial frequency hypothesis in ASD
proposes that the detail-oriented bias in ASD reflects
enhanced sensitivity to high spatial frequencies or a
reduced sensitivity to low spatial frequencies (Behr-
mann et al., 2006; Kemner & van Engeland, 2006;
Milne et al., 2002). The studies performed based on this
hypothesis have used widely differing techniques to
measure visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, and the
results have been at least partially inconsistent (for a
review see Koh et al., 2010a, b). For example, a recent
study measured visual acuity, triggering a debate about
the possibility of a supernormal acuity—within the
range of predator birds—in ASD (Ashwin, Ashwin,
Rhydderch, Howells, & Baron-Cohen, 2009). However,
the methodology used in that study has been ques-
tioned and has led to several follow-up studies that did
not replicate the effect (Bach & Dakin, 2009; Bolte et
al., 2012; Crewther & Sutherland, 2009).
Visual acuity is just one aspect of spatial contrast
sensitivity. Several behavioral studies have measured
contrast sensitivity thresholds at different spatial
frequencies and have found no significant difference
between ASD and neurotypical (NT) age-matched
controls (Behrmann et al., 2006; Bertone & Faubert,
2003; Bertone, Mottron, Jelenic, & Faubert, 2005; Koh,
Milne, & Dobkins, 2010b; Pellicano et al., 2005). In
contrast to these results, lower thresholds have been
found in a high-risk population of 6-month-old siblings
of children with ASD (McCleery, Allman, Carver, &
Dobkins, 2007). Behavioral spatial acuity and contrast
sensitivity measures appear to be largely unaffected in
ASD, but tasks involving more integrative processing
are adversely affected.
Electrophysiological recordings are particularly use-
ful in neurodevelopmental disorders as measures of
sensory processing because they do not require any task
performance or language/comprehension abilities.
Event-related potential (ERP) data show specific neural
abnormalities in ASD that are related to low-level
visual processing. ERP responses for Navon stimuli
and motion stimuli have been compared by Sutherland
and Crewther (2010) in people with high scores on the
autism spectrum quotient (AQ), a scale that measures
the prevalence of behaviors associated with ASD
(Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Skinner, Martin, &
Clubley, 2001; Brugha et al., 2012). The AQ is
correlated with scores on the Autism Diagnostic
Observation Schedule (ADOS), the current research
standard for the diagnosis of ASD, but it is only weakly
predictive of criterion scores for ASD. Participants
with high AQ scores showed weaker initial cortical
responses to low-contrast stimuli and diminished
identification of the global components in the Navon
task. This was interpreted as a delay in primary visual/
Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, & Norcia 2
prestriate cortical processing of magnocellular input
(Sutherland & Crewther, 2010). A follow-up study in a
similar participant group also found deficits in the
earliest recordable response components and larger-
than-normal responses when measured over a range of
contrasts (Jackson et al., 2013). The ERP in an object
boundary detection paradigm was found to be abnor-
mal in ASD, with differences emerging as early as 120
ms after stimulus presentation (Vandenbroucke,
Scholte, van Engeland, Lamme, & Kemner, 2008),
implying a deficit in early to midlevel cortical process-
ing stages. Using Gabor patches of different spatial
frequencies, Milne, Scope, Pascalis, Buckley, and
Makeig (2009) found a general reduction in latency for
the ASD group but also a more specific increase in low
a-band power in the components located in or near the
left cingulate gyrus in the participants with ASD,
suggesting that different low-level strategies were used
during the task by ASD versus typical participants.
ERP abnormalities have been found in the process-
ing of suprathreshold spatial frequency gratings. ERP
alterations at 6 cycles/deg (cpd) were found in the N80
component, while atypical processing of both high- and
low-frequency gratings occurred later in the P100
response (Boeschoten, Kenemans, van Engeland, &
Kemner, 2007). Jemel, Mimeault, Saint-Amour, Ho-
sein, and Mottron (2010) recorded visual evoked
potentials (VEPs) from vertical sinusoidal achromatic
gratings at different spatial frequencies. The N80
component elicited by grating from 2.8 to 8 cpd was
smaller at low contrast levels in ASD versus control
groups. Taken together, the ERP results suggest that
suprathreshold processing at very early stages of the
visual pathway may be disrupted in ASD.
To further quantify the extent to which very low-
level visual deficits may be present in ASD, we
measured steady-state visual evoked potentials
(SSVEPs) in response to a wide range of spatial
frequencies using the sweep technique (Norcia & Tyler,
1985). This method has several advantages for use in
populations with neurodevelopmental disorders. It can
be used to estimate sensory thresholds (e.g., the limits
of neuronal performance) as well as responsiveness at
suprathreshold levels and, importantly, it does not
require observers to engage in behavioral tasks,
potentially increasing its application over a greater
range of severities in clinical populations. The use of
grating stimuli reduces the complexity of visual
processing to the minimum level, and an analysis of the
SSVEP scalp topography from high-density electroen-
cephalography (EEG) recordings allows us to make a
rough assessment as to whether the underlying
generators of the response lie in the early visual cortex.
ASD participants show reductions in the VEP
response recorded over the early visual cortex to a
specific range of spatial frequencies (approximately 5–
17 cpd), and these reductions are restricted to a specific
temporal component of the VEP recording, the second
harmonic. We also find a relative reduction of signal
amplitude over the right hemisphere. These differences
in the way spatial frequency information is processed in
the autistic brain suggest that early cortical mechanisms
are altered in ASD. Taken together, the patterns of
deficit we observe may constitute a biomarker for ASD.
Methods and materials
Participants
Sixteen children with ASD (5–17 years old; mean age
¼ 9.2 years) participated in the study. They were
recruited through the Lucile Packard Children’s
Hospital at Stanford, the Interactive Autism Network
at Autism Speaks, and local parents’ associations. The
diagnosis of ASD was made on the basis of the fourth
edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2000b)
since at the time of the assessment the fifth edition of
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
had not been published. Each diagnosis was confirmed
by an experienced clinician using the ADOS instrument
(Lord et al., 1989). Subjects with mental retardation
due to genetic and neurological pathology of other
kinds were excluded from the study. Control partici-
pants were typically developing, age-matched children
(n¼17; mean age¼8.6 years) with no history of serious
medical, psychiatric, or neurological conditions who
were recruited through local schools. Because SSVEP
testing involves no instructions or tasks, is relatively
unaffected by attention, and is not affected by IQ (as is
a measure used in infants), we did not match the
participants on cognitive level. Because SSVEP grating
acuity is adult-like at age 5 (Norcia & Manny, 2003;
Norcia & Tyler, 1985), we pooled the results across all
ages. All participants had normal or correct-to-normal
vision, as also confirmed by the results of the study.
Informed consent was obtained from a parent or
guardian of the child, and an assent was signed by the
participant whenever possible. The Institutional Re-
view Board at Stanford University approved the
experimental protocol.
Experimental paradigm
Vertical, sine-wave luminance gratings were pre-
sented as gray-scale images on a contrast-linearized
cathode ray tube (CRT) (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA)
1600 · 1200 pixels and a vertical refresh rate of 72 Hz
over a field size of 378 by 288 at a mean luminance of
Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, & Norcia 3
50 cd/m2
. The gratings were presented at 80% contrast
and were contrast reversed with a square-wave
temporal profile at 7.5 Hz. The contrast reversal was
precisely synchronized to the vertical refresh rate of the
monitor (60 Hz). The participants sat at a viewing
distance of 1.5 m and were asked to look at the center
of the screen for the duration of individual trials that
lasted 12.8 s. When necessary, a researcher stood
behind the screen while holding a control device to stop
recording when the subject was not fixating in the
center of the screen. The fixation was monitored by
observing the centration of the corneal reflection of the
display monitor in the participants’ pupils. This
measure is accurate to approximately 48, a small
fraction of the grating display area (Allen, Tyler, &
Norcia, 1996).
We used a steady-state sweep VEP technique that
has been used many times before to measure spatial
frequency response functions both in NT infants,
children, and adults and in clinical populations
(Almoqbel, Leat, & Irving, 2008; Norcia & Manny,
2003). Following typical practice, the spatial frequency
of the grating was swept in equal linear increments (10)
over trials lasting 12 s. The spatial frequency range (2–
30 cpd) was chosen based on previous studies using
adults and older children as one that would span the
full range between very visible and invisible, including
the acuity range (Norcia & Manny, 2003; Skoczenski &
Norcia, 1999). The trial began with 1 s of an
unrecorded flickering 2-cpd grating in order to avoid
artifacts from the transient stimulus onset. Ten trials
were recorded for each subject, and all 10 trials in both
groups were used for the final analysis.
VEP recording and analysis
The EEG data were collected using a 128-channel
HydroCell Geodesic Sensor Net (Electrical Geodesics
Inc., Eugene, OR), bandpass filtered from 0.1 to 50 Hz
and digitized at a rate of 432 Hz (Net Amps 300 TM,
Electrical Geodesics). Individual electrodes were ad-
justed until impedances were below 60 kX before
starting the recording.
Artifact rejection was performed off-line according
to a sample-by-sample threshold procedure to remove
noisy electrodes and replace them with the average of
the six nearest neighboring electrodes. The EEG was
then rereferenced to the common average of all the
remaining electrodes. Epochs with more than 20% of
the data samples exceeding 100 lV were excluded on a
sensor-by-sensor basis; this is the criterion used for
normal adults. Typically, these epochs included eye
movements or blinks.
The 7.5-Hz pattern reversal response is an SSVEP
and is traditionally analyzed in the frequency domain
via Fourier analysis. The SSVEP amplitude in each 1-s
epoch corresponding to the spatial frequency steps in
the stimulus sweep was determined by a discrete
Fourier transform (Norcia & Tyler, 1985). Within a
subject, the amplitude and phase values were averaged
coherently (i.e., the average considered both phase and
amplitude values) over the 10 trials recorded in each
participant. Thresholds in the sweep VEP method were
estimated subject by subject by extrapolating amplitude
versus spatial frequency function to zero amplitude.
Group-average spatial frequency response functions
for the ASD and NT participants were formed by
incoherently averaging (using amplitudes only) the
individual subject amplitudes recorded at the second
(15 Hz) and fourth (30 Hz) harmonics of the stimulus
temporal frequency.
Acuity estimation
Grating acuity was estimated from the spatial
frequency response functions by regressing the VEP
amplitude versus spatial frequency function to zero
amplitude using criteria described in detail in previous
publications (Norcia, Clarke, & Tyler, 1985; Norcia &
Tyler, 1985). Briefly, an automatic scoring algorithm
searched the VEP record, starting from the highest
spatial frequency bin, for sections of the record that
exceeded a statistical criterion for the presence of an
evoked response that was monotonically increasing
with decreasing spatial frequency and whose phase was
either constant or decreasing in delay. Using this search
criterion, an approximately linear portion of the
suprathreshold response function was selected for the
regression to zero amplitude.
Results
As is typical of steady-state pattern-reversal re-
sponses (Regan, 1989), the recorded SSVEPs were
dominated by even harmonic response components.
Here reliable responses were consistently present at
both the second (15 Hz) and fourth (30 Hz) harmonics.
As can be seen in Figure 1, each harmonic component
was distributed over electrodes centered on the
occipital pole. SSVEP amplitudes were maximal at the
Oz electrode in both the NT and ASD groups.
Because the focus of activity at Oz in both groups
was maximal, we quantified the differences between
groups as a function of spatial frequency and response
harmonics at three electrodes—occipital channels O1,
Oz, and O2—that are centered on the maximum.
Figure 2 shows the group-average spatial frequency
tuning functions at each of these channels for the
Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, & Norcia 4
Figure 1. Topographic maps of the vector-average spectral amplitude collapsed across all spatial frequencies at the second and fourth
harmonics for both NT and ASD participants.
Figure 2. Amplitude of the sweep VEPs for the second harmonic (top) and the fourth harmonic (bottom) for three locations on the
scalp: O1 (left), Oz (Baca et al., 2009), and O2 (right). Electrodes are placed according to the 10-10 channels system map. Each graph
shows spatial frequency tuning functions for NT (filled circles) and ASD (open squares) observers. Error bars report the standard error
of the mean.
Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, & Norcia 5
second and fourth harmonics in the top and bottom
panels, respectively. The open squares plot data from
the ASD group, and the filled circles plot data from the
NT observers.
The second harmonic spatial frequency tuning
function had a peak at ;8 cpd in the NT group and a
second limb above ;15 cpd, consistent with previous
results with similar stimuli (Parry, Murray, & Hadjize-
nonos, 1999; Strasburger, Murray, & Remky, 1993). At
each electrode, second harmonic amplitudes were lower
in the ASD group between 5 and 17 cpd. ASD and NT
amplitudes were similar outside of this range of spatial
frequencies and at all spatial frequencies at the fourth
harmonic. Second harmonic response amplitude at the
spatial frequency of the largest response in the NT group
was 30% to 40% larger than it was in the ASD group at
Oz (p ¼ 0.087) and was more than a factor of two larger
at O2 (p ¼ 0.01). Responses at O1 were not significantly
different (p ¼ 0.35). The peak spatial frequency of the
fourth harmonic function was slightly lower (5 cpd) in
both groups, but there was no difference in amplitude at
any of the electrodes. The locations of the peaks and the
results of two-tailed t-tests for each harmonic and
electrode are indicated in Figure 2 by the arrows with
corresponding p-values. The top-center panel also plots
the average grating acuity thresholds (the two isolated
points with error along the x-axis) calculated from
individual-participant vector-averaged functions, along
with the standard error of the mean. Grating acuities did
not differ between the ASD and NT groups (25.8 6 1.47
cpd in the NT group and 24.6 6 1.99 cpd in the ASD
group, p ¼ 0.11, ns).
To confirm that the reported significant differences
between groups were not due to a small number of
individual participants in either group or unequal
variance between groups and to show the power of the
statistical effects, we compared the group differences on
10,000 bootstrap samples of the two groups. This
allowed us to create a distribution-free, empirical
sampling distribution that we used to confirm the
difference we report from conventional t-tests.
Table 1 summarizes the statistical analysis per-
formed. For each electrode and harmonic (first and
second columns from left, respectively), we report the
output of our two-tailed t-tests. The third column from
left reports the degrees of freedom (df), which is always
31 except for the second harmonic at O2. In this specific
condition the data do not fulfill the assumption of
homoscedasticity and the results are corrected accord-
ing to Levene’s test for equality of variances. The
central column (t) reports the value of t, while the
column labeled p reports the p-values returned com-
paring the empirical data. We also performed the same
comparisons on log-transformed data because this
transformation equalized the variances between
groups. Each of these comparisons showed p-values
equal to or smaller than those reported in Table 1.
The two rightmost columns in Figure 2 report the
power, measured as the proportion of significant t-test
comparisons, and the median p-value. In particular, the
power column clearly indicates that the difference
grows steadily only in the second harmonic by moving
the recording site from left to right, and the t-test is
very powerful for electrode O2. At the fourth harmonic
the channel showing the largest trend was significant in
only about 12% of the bootstrap samples, implying no
difference between groups at this harmonic.
Discussion
SSVEP responses show that ASD has a highly
specific effect on the processing of spatial information
in the early visual cortex. The effect we observe is
restricted to a subset of the full range of spatial
frequencies tested and to the second harmonic. There
are no group-level differences at any spatial frequency
at the fourth harmonic. Our results are particularly
clear on the specifically visual and neural nature of the
difference because the selectivity of the deficits rules out
nonspecific group-level differences in quality of fixa-
tion, accommodation, or motion artifacts. Each of
these possible sources of group differences should affect
both the second and fourth harmonics because they
affect either the quality of the input or the quality of
Electrode Harmonic df t p Power Median p
O1 (left) Second 31 À0.944 0.353 0.167 0.303
Fourth 31 0.986 0.332 0.125 0.302
Oz (central) Second 31 À1.767 0.087 0.409 0.079
Fourth 31 0.698 0.491 0.088 0.389
O2 (right) Second 24.34 À2.759 0.011 0.782 0.009
Fourth 31 À0.391 0.699 0.072 0.461
Table 1. Results of the three 2-tailed t-test comparisons of peak amplitudes between groups for each of the three channels and for
each of the two harmonics considered (second column). Levene’s test of homoscedasticity was significant only at O2 for the second
harmonic component (degrees of freedom corrected accordingly). The two rightmost columns report the power measured as the
proportion of significant t-test comparison.
Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, & Norcia 6
the evoked potential recording equivalently. Similarly,
variations in attention between the groups would be
unlikely to explain differences between the two
harmonics because they are measured simultaneously
from the same data record.
Two previous behavioral studies (Behrmann et al.,
2006; Koh et al., 2010b) made detailed measurements
of contrast sensitivity over the range of spatial
frequencies where we found second harmonic deficits
(5–17 cpd). These studies found no differences in
threshold sensitivity between ASD and NT controls. It
is possible that the effects we observe are restricted to
high levels of sensory input and may thus reflect a
failure of the regulation of contrast gain rather than
changes in absolute sensitivity.
What might underlie the specific loss seen at the
second harmonic? A previous SSVEP spatial frequency
tuning study suggested that the second harmonic of the
SSVEP pattern reversal response is generated by
separate channels operating at lower versus higher
spatial frequencies (Strasburger et al., 1993). Our
results are consistent with separate spatial processing
mechanisms because the response at 2 cpd is normal
but the response over the range of 8.2 to 14.4 cpd is not.
However, this cannot be the whole story. First, we find
another range of spatial frequencies above the limit of
Strasburger et al.’s (1993) higher spatial frequency
mechanism where responses are normal. This suggests
the presence of a third spatial channel. Second, our
channel properties are not strictly determined by their
spatial frequency tuning: The fourth harmonic response
component shows no effect over the entire range. Given
the mass nature of the SSVEP, it is likely that multiple
underlying generators contribute to the recorded signal.
Our results indicate that a subset of these multiple
generators is specifically affected by ASD. It will be
important in future research to determine the underly-
ing neural substrates that contribute to the second and
fourth harmonics in order to pinpoint the neural basis
of the ASD deficit we have observed.
Visual acuity
By recording SSVEPs over a wide range of spatial
frequencies, we were also able to objectively estimate
the visual acuity threshold without the task demands of
psychophysical experiments. We found no difference in
grating acuity in the ASD and control groups,
consistent with the results of more recent behavioral
studies (Bach & Dakin, 2009; Tavassoli, Latham, Bach,
Dakin, & Baron-Cohen, 2011). These results further
reinforce that the two groups were equally able to
comply with the task demands for fixation and
accommodation despite the absence of a requirement
for performance of a specific behavioral task.
Hemispheric asymmetry
Another important result of the present study is the
selective reduction of the SSVEP response over the
right hemisphere. Right-hemisphere deficits in VEP
responses have been reported in a previous study. The
evoked response to photic stimulation over the right
occipital cortex was depressed when measured at 11
fixed temporal frequencies (3–24 Hz) in a group of
children aged 6 to 14 years with the diagnosis of autism
without significant mental retardation (Lazarev, Pon-
tes, & deAzevedo, 2009). Our findings confirm and
extend this previous report of right-hemisphere alter-
ations of the visual response in ASD. Additional
evidence for right-hemisphere sensory deficits comes
from a magnetoencephalography study on auditory
processing (Orekhova et al., 2012). Orekhova et al.
(2012) found a relationship between the severity of the
sensory modulation abnormalities and the lack of
normal rightward lateralization of P100 in ASD
children. The right hemisphere in autistic people also
fails to respond to auditory temporal novelty (Ore-
khova et al., 2009). Finally, broadband EEG power has
an abnormal distribution suggestive of a loss in the
right hemisphere when measured in boys with autism
between 3 and 8 years old (Stroganova et al., 2007).
At the behavioral level, abnormal brain lateralization
has also been implicated in an eye tracking study
performed in a group at high risk for ASD (infant
siblings of children with an ASD diagnosis). High-risk
infants did not show a left visual field fixation bias like
the one displayed by low-risk infants (Dundas, Gastgeb,
& Strauss, 2012). Typically developing children prefer-
entially fixate the left part of the face. Information from
the left visual field is projected to the right hemisphere,
which is known to be associated with face processing
abilities, with notable lateralization in the right fusiform
gyrus (Haxby, Hoffman, & Gobbini, 2000).
Vulnerability of one hemisphere versus another may be
due to the two cerebral hemispheres having different
developmental trajectories in normal development: The
right hemisphere develops more quickly during typical
fetal development (Geschwind & Galaburda, 1985;
Hellige, 1993). Differential developmental sequences may
expose the two hemispheres differentially to environ-
mental influences or may indicate that separate genetic
programs control the development of the two hemi-
spheres. The ASD phenotype we observe could result
from either of these two factors or a combination of both.
Relationship of the present findings to higher-
level visual cognition
Studying the early visual system can provide
information on brain circuitry as well as on the extent
Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, & Norcia 7
to which low-level visual anomalies may influence
higher-level vision and cognition. The visual world
contains a wide range of spatial scales that constantly
change while we are moving closer to or farther away
from objects. The difficulty of processing visual targets
can be predicted in typically developed subjects by
using the results of spatial contrast sensitivity tests
(Owsley & Sloane, 1987). This relationship may,
however, break down in autism, especially at high levels
of input. The method used here to identify spatial
processing deficits may be useful in determining
whether certain spatial frequency bands contribute to
deficits on other tasks, such as ones involving local and
global dimensions (Blakemore & Campbell, 1969;
Brady & Oliva, 2012). Several studies in this area have
suggested that the processing of local and more global
aspects of both hierarchical and face stimuli is related
to the processing of specific spatial frequencies (Bad-
cock, Whitworth, Badcock, & Lovegrove, 1990;
Boeschoten, Kemner, Kenemans, & van Engeland,
2005; Goffaux, Gauthier, & Rossion, 2003; Goffaux,
Hault, Michel, Vuong, & Rossion, 2005; Han, Yund, &
Woods, 2003; Jemel, Mottron, & Dawson, 2006;
LaGasse, 1993; Ruiz-Soler & Beltran, 2006). It would
be informative to compare neural measures of spatial
processing such as the ones performed here with
behavioral ones to determine whether one is predictive
of the other, as would be the case if the local processing
bias of subjects with ASD for these and other visual
stimuli is related to a pervasive abnormality in spatial
frequency analysis (Deruelle, Rondan, Gepner, &
Tardif, 2004; Plaisted, Dobler, Bell, & Davis, 2006).
A challenge for future research is relating the
suprathreshold processing deficits we have observed to
behavioral responses. The SSVEP deficit we have
observed is not simply a deficit at certain spatial
frequencies. Some of the evoked response, that portion
contained in the fourth harmonic, is not affected in ASD.
Exactly what aspect of behavior would be associated with
the fourth rather than the second harmonic is not
completely clear at this point. What is needed is a better
understanding of the nonlinear mechanisms that give rise
to the SSVEP and further exploration of the full range of
spatial and temporal frequencies that form the limits of
spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity. Further inves-
tigation of this topic is needed in order to better
understand at which point of the neural pathway the
deficits we observe are generated. It will also be important
to determine whether the highly selective pattern of
response alterations we have observed here is specific to
ASD or whether it occurs in other forms of intellectual
disability. This is particularly important to establish if one
wishes to use quantitative neural measurements such as
those presented here to guide treatment, intervention, and
optimization of the stimulation used, especially given the
proliferation of electronic device-based applications
dedicated to a wide population of autistic users.
Conclusions
Our results add to the accumulating body of
evidence suggesting that deficits at the earliest stages of
sensory processing are associated with autism. Since the
visual system is organized hierarchically, abnormalities
in higher-level functions may be at least partially due to
downstream effects of abnormalities occurring at
earlier stages. Quantitative and efficient SSVEP mea-
surements of low-level visual processing mechanisms
may ultimately help us understand the overall abilities
of people with ASD to interpret and make full sense of
the visual world. Conversely, the specificity of the
deficits we find is difficult to explain on the basis of
deficits in higher-level cognitive functions such as
language, task comprehension or performance issues,
or IQ. Rather, our results point to what could be a very
specific biological substrate that is altered in ASD.
Key points:
 Sensory processing abnormalities are common in
ASD.
 The visual system can be used as an entry point to
study brain activity and system regulation.
 We can use task-absent VEP tests to study very low-
level visual functions that can potentially provide
new biomarkers for the diagnosis of the disorder
early in life.
 The spatial processing abnormalities and the brain
hemispheric asymmetry that we have found may
undermine high-level cognitive functions and inter-
fere with the child’s interaction with the visual
world.
Keywords: autism, vision, visual evoked potential,
spatial frequency, visual perception
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Simons Foundation
for Autism Research Initiative (SFARI) and by the
Bass Society for Pediatric Scholars. We thank all the
families and children who dedicated their time to help
us with our research project.
Commercial relationships: none.
Corresponding author: Francesca Pei.
Email: fpei@stanford.edu.
Address: Department of Psychology, Stanford Uni-
versity, Stanford, CA, USA.
Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi,  Norcia 8
References
Allen, D., Tyler, C. W.,  Norcia, A. M. (1996).
Development of grating acuity and contrast sensi-
tivity in the central and peripheral visual field of the
human infant. Vision Research, 36(13), 1945–1953.
Almoqbel, F., Leat, S. J.,  Irving, E. (2008). The
technique, validity and clinical use of the sweep
VEP. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 28(5),
393–403, doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00591.x.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000a). Diagnostic
criteria from DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC:
American Psychiatric Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000b). Electronic
DSM-IV-TR plus [CD-ROM].
Ashwin, E., Ashwin, C., Rhydderch, D., Howells, J., 
Baron-Cohen, S. (2009). Eagle-eyed visual acuity:
An experimental investigation of enhanced per-
ception in autism. Biological Psychiatry, 65(1), 17–
21, doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.06.012.
Baca, C. B., Cheng, E. M., Spencer, S. S., Vassar, S.,
Vickrey, B. G.,  Multicenter Study of Epilepsy
Surgery. (2009). Racial differences in patient
expectations prior to resective epilepsy surgery.
Epilepsy and Behavior, 15(4), 452–455, doi:10.1016/
j.yebeh.2009.05.010.
Bach, M.,  Dakin, S. C. (2009). Regarding ‘‘Eagle-
eyed visual acuity: An experimental investigation of
enhanced perception in autism.’’ Biological Psychi-
atry, 66(10), e19–e20, doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.
02.035.
Badcock, J. C., Whitworth, F. A., Badcock, D. R., 
Lovegrove, W. J. (1990). Low-frequency filtering
and the processing of local-global stimuli. Percep-
tion, 19(5), 617–629.
Baldassi, S., Pei, F., Megna, N., Recupero, G.,
Viespoli, M., Igliozzi, R., . . . Cioni, G. (2009).
Search superiority in autism within, but not outside
the crowding regime. Vision Research, 49(16),
2151–2156, doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.06.007.
Baranek, G. T., David, F. J., Poe, M. D., Stone, W. L.,
 Watson, L. R. (2006). Sensory Experiences
Questionnaire: Discriminating sensory features in
young children with autism, developmental delays,
and typical development. Journal of Child Psy-
chology and Psychiatry, 47(6), 591–601, doi:10.
1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01546.x.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin,
J.,  Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum
quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/
high-functioning autism, males and females, scien-
tists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and
Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5–17.
Behrmann, M., Avidan, G., Leonard, G. L., Kimchi,
R., Luna, B., Humphreys, K.,  Minshew, N.
(2006). Configural processing in autism and its
relationship to face processing. Neuropsychologia,
44(1), 110–129, doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.
2005.04.002.
Bertone, A.,  Faubert, J. (2003). How is complex
second-order motion processed? Vision Research,
43(25), 2591–2601.
Bertone, A., Mottron, L., Jelenic, P.,  Faubert, J.
(2003). Motion perception in autism: A ‘‘complex’’
issue. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(2), 218–
225, doi:10.1162/089892903321208150.
Bertone, A., Mottron, L., Jelenic, P.,  Faubert, J.
(2005). Enhanced and diminished visuo-spatial
information processing in autism depends on
stimulus complexity. Brain, 128(Pt. 10), 2430–2441,
doi:10.1093/brain/awh561.
Blakemore, C.,  Campbell, F. W. (1969). Adaptation
to spatial stimuli. Journal of Physiology, 200(1),
11P–13P.
Boeschoten, M. A., Kemner, C., Kenemans, J. L., 
van Engeland, H. (2005). The relationship between
local and global processing and the processing of
high and low spatial frequencies studied by event-
related potentials and source modeling. Brain
Research Cognitive Brain Research, 24(2), 228–236,
doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.021.
Boeschoten, M. A., Kenemans, J. L., van Engeland, H.,
 Kemner, C. (2007). Abnormal spatial frequency
processing in high-functioning children with per-
vasive developmental disorder (PDD). Clinical
Neurophysiology, 118(9), 2076–2088, doi:10.1016/j.
clinph.2007.05.004.
Bolte, S., Schlitt, S., Gapp, V., Hainz, D., Schirman, S.,
Poustka, F., . . . Walter, H. (2012). A close eye on
the eagle-eyed visual acuity hypothesis of autism.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,
42(5), 726–733, doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1300-3.
Brady, T. F.,  Oliva, A. (2012). Spatial frequency
integration during active perception: Perceptual
hysteresis when an object recedes. Frontiers in
Psychology, 3, 462,doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00462.
Brugha, T. S., McManus, S., Smith, J., Scott, F. J.,
Meltzer, H., Purdon, S., . . . Bankart, J. (2012).
Validating two survey methods for identifying cases
of autism spectrum disorder among adults in the
community. Psychological Medicine, 42(3), 647–
656, doi:10.1017/S0033291711001292.
Caron, M. J., Mottron, L., Berthiaume, C.,  Dawson,
M. (2006). Cognitive mechanisms, specificity and
Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi,  Norcia 9
neural underpinnings of visuospatial peaks in
autism. Brain, 129(Pt. 7), 1789–1802, doi:10.1093/
brain/awl072.
Crewther, D. P.,  Sutherland, A. (2009). The more he
looked inside, the more Piglet wasn’t there: Is
autism really blessed with visual hyperacuity?
Biological Psychiatry, 66(10), e21–e22, doi:10.1016/
j.biopsych.2009.02.036.
Dakin, S.,  Frith, U. (2005). Vagaries of visual
perception in autism. Neuron, 48(3), 497–507, doi:
10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.018.
Deruelle, C., Rondan, C., Gepner, B.,  Tardif, C.
(2004). Spatial frequency and face processing in
children with autism and Asperger syndrome.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,
34(2), 199–210.
Dundas, E., Gastgeb, H.,  Strauss, M. S. (2012). Left
visual field biases when infants process faces: A
comparison of infants at high- and low-risk for
autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and
Developmental Disorders, 42(12), 2659–2668, doi:
10.1007/s10803-012-1523-y.
Geschwind, N.,  Galaburda, A. M. (1985). Cerebral
lateralization. Biological mechanisms, associations,
and pathology: III. A hypothesis and a program for
research. Archives of Neurology, 42(7), 634–654.
Goffaux, V., Gauthier, I.,  Rossion, B. (2003). Spatial
scale contribution to early visual differences be-
tween face and object processing. Brain Research
Cognitive Brain Research, 16(3), 416–424.
Goffaux, V., Hault, B., Michel, C., Vuong, Q. C., 
Rossion, B. (2005). The respective role of low and
high spatial frequencies in supporting configural
and featural processing of faces. Perception, 34(1),
77–86.
Frith, U. (1989). Autism and ‘‘theory of mind.’’ In C.
Gillberg (Ed.), Diagnosis and treatment of autism
(pp. 33–52). New York: Plenum Press.
Han, S., Yund, E. W.,  Woods, D. L. (2003). An ERP
study of the global precedence effect: The role of
spatial frequency. Clinical Neurophysiology,
114(10), 1850–1865.
Happe, F. G. (1996). Studying weak central coherence
at low levels: Children with autism do not succumb
to visual illusions. A research note. Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(7), 873–877.
Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A.,  Gobbini, M. I. (2000).
The distributed human neural system for face
perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(6), 223–
233.
Hellige, J. B. (1993). Hemispheric asymmetry: What’s
right and what’s left. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Jackson, B. L., Blackwood, E. M., Blum, J., Car-
ruthers, S. P., Nemorin, S., Pryor, B. A., . . .
Crewther, D. P. (2013). Magno- and parvocellular
contrast responses in varying degrees of autistic
trait. PLoS One, 8(6), e66797, doi:10.1371/journal.
pone.0066797.
Jemel, B., Mimeault, D., Saint-Amour, D., Hosein, A.,
 Mottron, L. (2010). VEP contrast sensitivity
responses reveal reduced functional segregation of
mid and high filters of visual channels in autism.
Journal of Vision, 10(6):13, 1–13, http://www.
journalofvision.org/content/10/6/13, doi:10.1167/
10.6.13. [PubMed] [Article]
Jemel, B., Mottron, L.,  Dawson, M. (2006).
Impaired face processing in autism: Fact or
artifact? Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders, 36(1), 91–106, doi:10.1007/
s10803-005-0050-5.
Jolliffe, T.,  Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Are people with
autism and Asperger syndrome faster than normal
on the Embedded Figures Test? Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 527–534.
Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective
contact. Nervous Child, 2(3), 217–250.
Kemner, C.,  van Engeland, H. (2006). ERPs and eye
movements reflect atypical visual perception in
pervasive developmental disorder. Journal of Au-
tism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 45–54.
Klintwall, L., Holm, A., Eriksson, M., Carlsson, L. H.,
Olsson, M. B., Hedvall, A., . . . Fernell, E. (2011).
Sensory abnormalities in autism. A brief report.
Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 795–
800, doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.10.021.
Koh, H. C., Milne, E.,  Dobkins, K. (2010a).
Contrast sensitivity for motion detection and
direction discrimination in adolescents with autism
spectrum disorders and their siblings. Neuropsy-
chologia, 48(14), 4046–4056, doi:10.1016/j.
neuropsychologia.2010.10.008.
Koh, H. C., Milne, E.,  Dobkins, K. (2010b). Spatial
contrast sensitivity in adolescents with autism
spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Devel-
opmental Disorders, 40(8), 978–987, doi:10.1007/
s10803-010-0953-7.
LaGasse, L. L. (1993). Effects of good form and spatial
frequency on global precedence. Perception and
Psychophysics, 53(1), 89–105.
Lazarev, V. V., Pontes, A.,  deAzevedo, L. C. (2009).
EEG photic driving: Right-hemisphere reactivity
deficit in childhood autism. A pilot study. Interna-
Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi,  Norcia 10
tional Journal of Psychophysiology, 71(2), 177–183,
doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.08.008.
Leekam, S. R., Nieto, C., Libby, S. J., Wing, L., 
Gould, J. (2007). Describing the sensory abnor-
malities of children and adults with autism. Journal
of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(5), 894–
910, doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0218-7.
Lord, C., Rutter, M., Goode, S., Heemsbergen, J.,
Jordan, H., Mawhood, L.,  Schopler, E. (1989).
Autism diagnostic observation schedule: A stan-
dardized observation of communicative and social
behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders, 19(2), 185–212.
Marco, E. J., Hinkley, L. B., Hill, S. S.,  Nagarajan,
S. S. (2011). Sensory processing in autism: A review
of neurophysiologic findings. Pediatric Research,
69(5 Pt. 2), 48R–54R, doi:10.1203/PDR.
0b013e3182130c54.
McCleery, J. P., Allman, E., Carver, L. J.,  Dobkins,
K. R. (2007). Abnormal magnocellular pathway
visual processing in infants at risk for autism.
Biological Psychiatry, 62(9), 1007–1014, doi:10.
1016/j.biopsych.2007.02.009.
Milne, E., Scope, A., Pascalis, O., Buckley, D., 
Makeig, S. (2009). Independent component analy-
sis reveals atypical electroencephalographic activity
during visual perception in individuals with autism.
Biological Psychiatry, 65(1), 22–30, doi:10.1016/j.
biopsych.2008.07.017.
Milne, E., Swettenham, J., Hansen, P., Campbell, R.,
Jeffries, H.,  Plaisted, K. (2002). High motion
coherence thresholds in children with autism.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(2),
255–263.
Milne, E., White, S., Campbell, R., Swettenham, J.,
Hansen, P.,  Ramus, F. (2006). Motion and form
coherence detection in autistic spectrum disorder:
Relationship to motor control and 2:4 digit ratio.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,
36(2), 225–237, doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0052-3.
Mottron, L.,  Belleville, S. (1993). A study of
perceptual analysis in a high-level autistic subject
with exceptional graphic abilities. Brain and Cog-
nition, 23(2), 279–309, doi:10.1006/brcg.1993.1060.
Mottron, L., Dawson, M., Souli`eres, I., Hubert, B., 
Burack, J. (2006). Enhanced perceptual functioning
in autism: an update, and eight principles of autistic
perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders, 36(1), 27–43.
Newsome, W. T.,  Pare, E. B. (1988). A selective
impairment of motion perception following lesions
of the middle temporal visual area (MT). Journal of
Neuroscience, 8(6), 2201–2211.
Norcia, A. M., Clarke, M.,  Tyler, C. W. (1985).
Digital filtering and robust regression techniques
for estimating sensory thresholds from the evoked
potential. IEEE Engineering and Medicine in
Biology, 4, 26–32.
Norcia, A. M.,  Manny, R.E. (2003). Development of
vision in infants. In P. L. Kaufman  A. Alm
(Eds.), Adler’s physiology of the eye (10th ed., pp.
531–551). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
Norcia, A. M.,  Tyler, C. W. (1985). Spatial frequency
sweep VEP: Visual acuity during the first year of
life. Vision Research, 25(10), 1399–1408.
Orekhova, E. V., Stroganova, T. A., Prokofiev, A. O.,
Nygren, G., Gillberg, C.,  Elam, M. (2009). The
right hemisphere fails to respond to temporal
novelty in autism: Evidence from an ERP study.
Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(3), 520–529, doi:10.
1016/j.clinph.2008.12.034.
Orekhova, E. V., Tsetlin, M. M., Butorina, A. V.,
Novikova, S. I., Gratchev, V. V., Sokolov, P. A.,
. . . Stroganova, T. A. (2012). Auditory cortex
responses to clicks and sensory modulation diffi-
culties in children with autism spectrum disorders
(ASD). PLoS One, 7(6), e39906, doi:10.1371/
journal.pone.0039906.
O’Riordan, M.,  Passetti, F. (2006). Discrimination in
autism within different sensory modalities. Journal
of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(5), 665–
675, doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0106-1.
O’Riordan, M. A., Plaisted, K. C., Driver, J.,  Baron-
Cohen, S. (2001). Superior visual search in autism.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Per-
ception and Performance, 27(3), 719–730.
Owsley, C.,  Sloane, M. E. (1987). Contrast
sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of ‘real-
world’ targets. British Journal of Ophthalmology,
71(10), 791–796.
Parry, N. R., Murray, I. J.,  Hadjizenonos, C. (1999).
Spatio-temporal tuning of VEPs: Effect of mode of
stimulation. Vision Research, 39(21), 3491–3497.
Pei, F., Baldassi, S., Procida, G., Igliozzi, R., Tancredi,
R., Muratori, F.,  Cioni, G. (2009). Neural
correlates of texture and contour integration in
children with autism spectrum disorders. Vision
Research, 49(16), 2140–2150, doi:10.1016/j.visres.
2009.06.006.
Pellicano, E., Gibson, L., Maybery, M., Durkin, K., 
Badcock, D. R. (2005). Abnormal global process-
ing along the dorsal visual pathway in autism: A
possible mechanism for weak visuospatial coher-
ence? Neuropsychologia, 43(7), 1044–1053, doi:10.
1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.10.003.
Plaisted, K., Dobler, V., Bell, S.,  Davis, G. (2006).
Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi,  Norcia 11
The microgenesis of global perception in autism.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,
36(1), 107–116, doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0047-0.
Plaisted, K., O’Riordan, M.,  Baron-Cohen, S.
(1998). Enhanced visual search for a conjunctive
target in autism: A research note. Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(5), 777–783.
Plaisted, K., Swettenham, J.,  Rees, L. (1999).
Children with autism show local precedence in a
divided attention task and global precedence in a
selective attention task. Journal of Child Psychology
and Psychiatry, 40(5), 733–742.
Regan, D. (1989). Human brain electrophysiology:
Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in
science and medicine. New York: Elsevier.
Ruiz-Soler, M.,  Beltran, F. S. (2006). Face percep-
tion: An integrative review of the role of spatial
frequencies. Psychological Research, 70(4), 273–
292, doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0215-z.
Shah, A.,  Frith, U. (1983). An islet of ability in
autistic children: A research note. Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry, 24(4), 613–620.
Skoczenski, A. M.,  Norcia, A. M. (1999). Develop-
ment of VEP Vernier acuity and grating acuity in
human infants. Investigative Ophthalmology and
Visual Science, 40(10), 2411–2417, http://www.iovs.
org/content/40/10/2411. [PubMed] [Article]
Spencer, J., O’Brien, J., Riggs, K., Braddick, O.,
Atkinson, J.,  Wattam-Bell, J. (2000). Motion
processing in autism: Evidence for a dorsal stream
deficiency. Neuroreport, 11(12), 2765–2767.
Strasburger, H., Murray, I. J.,  Remky, A. (1993).
Sustained and transient mechanisms in the steady-
state visual-evoked potential—Onset presentation
compared to pattern reversal. Clinical Vision
Sciences, 8(3), 211–234.
Stroganova, T. A., Nygren, G., Tsetlin, M. M.,
Posikera, I. N., Gillberg, C., Elam, M., 
Orekhova, E. V. (2007). Abnormal EEG laterali-
zation in boys with autism. Clinical Neurophysiol-
ogy, 118(8), 1842–1854, doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.
05.005.
Sutherland, A.,  Crewther, D. P. (2010). Magnocel-
lular visual evoked potential delay with high autism
spectrum quotient yields a neural mechanism for
altered perception. Brain, 133(Pt. 7), 2089–2097,
doi:10.1093/brain/awq122.
Tavassoli, T., Latham, K., Bach, M., Dakin, S. C., 
Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). Psychophysical measures
of visual acuity in autism spectrum conditions.
Vision Research, 51(15), 1778–1780, doi:10.1016/j.
visres.2011.06.004.
Vandenbroucke, M. W., Scholte, H. S., van Engeland,
H., Lamme, V. A.,  Kemner, C. (2008). A neural
substrate for atypical low-level visual processing in
autism spectrum disorder. Brain, 131(Pt. 4), 1013–
1024, doi:10.1093/brain/awm321.
Venter, A., Lord, C.,  Schopler, E. (1992). A follow-
up study of high-functioning autistic children.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33(3),
489–507.
Williams, D. W.,  Sekuler, R. (1984). Coherent global
motion percepts from stochastic local motions.
Vision Research, 24(1), 55–62.
Wing, L. (1969). Handicaps of autistic children—A
comparative study. Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 10(1), 1–40, doi:
10.1111/J.1469-7610.1969.Tb02066.X.
Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi,  Norcia 12

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

IMPLICATOut(1)
IMPLICATOut(1)IMPLICATOut(1)
IMPLICATOut(1)haniiszah
 
Emily_Kelly_CV_January 2017
Emily_Kelly_CV_January 2017Emily_Kelly_CV_January 2017
Emily_Kelly_CV_January 2017Emily Kelly
 
Brain-Computer Interface and States of Vigilance
Brain-Computer Interface and States of VigilanceBrain-Computer Interface and States of Vigilance
Brain-Computer Interface and States of VigilanceStephen Larroque
 
Visual Evoked Potential in Normal and Amblyopic Children
Visual Evoked Potential in Normal and Amblyopic ChildrenVisual Evoked Potential in Normal and Amblyopic Children
Visual Evoked Potential in Normal and Amblyopic Childreniosrjce
 
Genetics science utility by Andy Goren
Genetics science utility by Andy GorenGenetics science utility by Andy Goren
Genetics science utility by Andy GorenVR Foundation
 
Optical Coherence Tomography in Multiple Sclerosis: a Structural & Functional...
Optical Coherence Tomography in Multiple Sclerosis: a Structural & Functional...Optical Coherence Tomography in Multiple Sclerosis: a Structural & Functional...
Optical Coherence Tomography in Multiple Sclerosis: a Structural & Functional...Manal AlRomeih
 
The Impact of Neurodegeneration on Network Connectivity: A Study of Change De...
The Impact of Neurodegeneration on Network Connectivity: A Study of Change De...The Impact of Neurodegeneration on Network Connectivity: A Study of Change De...
The Impact of Neurodegeneration on Network Connectivity: A Study of Change De...rockbam
 
Katoh_et_al-2015-Brain_and_Behavior
Katoh_et_al-2015-Brain_and_BehaviorKatoh_et_al-2015-Brain_and_Behavior
Katoh_et_al-2015-Brain_and_BehaviorRhea Kimpo
 
StefaniaButaPoster_48X36_3col_black
StefaniaButaPoster_48X36_3col_blackStefaniaButaPoster_48X36_3col_black
StefaniaButaPoster_48X36_3col_blackCandice Jaimungal
 
Theoretical Neuroscience and Deep Learning Theory
Theoretical Neuroscience and Deep Learning TheoryTheoretical Neuroscience and Deep Learning Theory
Theoretical Neuroscience and Deep Learning TheoryMLReview
 

Was ist angesagt? (10)

IMPLICATOut(1)
IMPLICATOut(1)IMPLICATOut(1)
IMPLICATOut(1)
 
Emily_Kelly_CV_January 2017
Emily_Kelly_CV_January 2017Emily_Kelly_CV_January 2017
Emily_Kelly_CV_January 2017
 
Brain-Computer Interface and States of Vigilance
Brain-Computer Interface and States of VigilanceBrain-Computer Interface and States of Vigilance
Brain-Computer Interface and States of Vigilance
 
Visual Evoked Potential in Normal and Amblyopic Children
Visual Evoked Potential in Normal and Amblyopic ChildrenVisual Evoked Potential in Normal and Amblyopic Children
Visual Evoked Potential in Normal and Amblyopic Children
 
Genetics science utility by Andy Goren
Genetics science utility by Andy GorenGenetics science utility by Andy Goren
Genetics science utility by Andy Goren
 
Optical Coherence Tomography in Multiple Sclerosis: a Structural & Functional...
Optical Coherence Tomography in Multiple Sclerosis: a Structural & Functional...Optical Coherence Tomography in Multiple Sclerosis: a Structural & Functional...
Optical Coherence Tomography in Multiple Sclerosis: a Structural & Functional...
 
The Impact of Neurodegeneration on Network Connectivity: A Study of Change De...
The Impact of Neurodegeneration on Network Connectivity: A Study of Change De...The Impact of Neurodegeneration on Network Connectivity: A Study of Change De...
The Impact of Neurodegeneration on Network Connectivity: A Study of Change De...
 
Katoh_et_al-2015-Brain_and_Behavior
Katoh_et_al-2015-Brain_and_BehaviorKatoh_et_al-2015-Brain_and_Behavior
Katoh_et_al-2015-Brain_and_Behavior
 
StefaniaButaPoster_48X36_3col_black
StefaniaButaPoster_48X36_3col_blackStefaniaButaPoster_48X36_3col_black
StefaniaButaPoster_48X36_3col_black
 
Theoretical Neuroscience and Deep Learning Theory
Theoretical Neuroscience and Deep Learning TheoryTheoretical Neuroscience and Deep Learning Theory
Theoretical Neuroscience and Deep Learning Theory
 

Ähnlich wie Pei electrophysiological measures of low level vision reveal spatial deficits and hemispheric asymmetry in autism spectrum disorder

Wilkinson_et_al-2016-Brain_and_Behavior
Wilkinson_et_al-2016-Brain_and_BehaviorWilkinson_et_al-2016-Brain_and_Behavior
Wilkinson_et_al-2016-Brain_and_BehaviorMolly Wilkinson
 
The risk of cognitive impairment assosiated with congenital deafness in child...
The risk of cognitive impairment assosiated with congenital deafness in child...The risk of cognitive impairment assosiated with congenital deafness in child...
The risk of cognitive impairment assosiated with congenital deafness in child...MaritLobben
 
Perception of shapes targeting local and globalprocesses in .docx
Perception of shapes targeting local and globalprocesses in .docxPerception of shapes targeting local and globalprocesses in .docx
Perception of shapes targeting local and globalprocesses in .docxdanhaley45372
 
Autism review article
Autism review articleAutism review article
Autism review articleAmolSawant52
 
Infancy and autism: Progress, prospects, and challenges
Infancy and autism: Progress, prospects, and challengesInfancy and autism: Progress, prospects, and challenges
Infancy and autism: Progress, prospects, and challengesELINA KREBS
 
Memory for Intentions Screening Test
Memory for Intentions Screening TestMemory for Intentions Screening Test
Memory for Intentions Screening TestColin MacKichan
 
Dermatoglyphic anomalies and neurocognitive deficits in sibling
Dermatoglyphic anomalies and neurocognitive deficits in siblingDermatoglyphic anomalies and neurocognitive deficits in sibling
Dermatoglyphic anomalies and neurocognitive deficits in siblingCA. Sanjay Ruia
 
Efficacy of Sensory and Motor Interventions for Children with Autism
Efficacy of Sensory and Motor Interventions for Children with AutismEfficacy of Sensory and Motor Interventions for Children with Autism
Efficacy of Sensory and Motor Interventions for Children with Autismhaniiszah
 
Sensory Enrichment Therapy Second RCT Design Study
Sensory Enrichment Therapy Second RCT Design StudySensory Enrichment Therapy Second RCT Design Study
Sensory Enrichment Therapy Second RCT Design StudyGreg Wootton, MOTR/L
 
Holt et al. (2015) NeuroImageClinical Looming Controls and Patients
Holt et al. (2015) NeuroImageClinical Looming Controls and PatientsHolt et al. (2015) NeuroImageClinical Looming Controls and Patients
Holt et al. (2015) NeuroImageClinical Looming Controls and PatientsStephanie DeCross
 
1-s2.0-S1878929319303378-main.pdf
1-s2.0-S1878929319303378-main.pdf1-s2.0-S1878929319303378-main.pdf
1-s2.0-S1878929319303378-main.pdfgayathri448667
 
Visual Dysfunction in Parkinson Disease
Visual Dysfunction in Parkinson DiseaseVisual Dysfunction in Parkinson Disease
Visual Dysfunction in Parkinson DiseaseAde Wijaya
 
Mirella Dapretto, PhD: Sensory Over-Responsivity in ASD: Insights from Neuroi...
Mirella Dapretto, PhD: Sensory Over-Responsivity in ASD: Insights from Neuroi...Mirella Dapretto, PhD: Sensory Over-Responsivity in ASD: Insights from Neuroi...
Mirella Dapretto, PhD: Sensory Over-Responsivity in ASD: Insights from Neuroi...Semel Admin
 
The Etiology Of Autism Essay
The Etiology Of Autism EssayThe Etiology Of Autism Essay
The Etiology Of Autism EssaySamantha Ross
 
A-V-P300 Response Control 8-11-13
A-V-P300 Response Control 8-11-13A-V-P300 Response Control 8-11-13
A-V-P300 Response Control 8-11-13Leah Klein Borden
 
Literatür1
Literatür1Literatür1
Literatür1TK57338
 
Vanni Vipp2010 presentation_bu
Vanni Vipp2010 presentation_buVanni Vipp2010 presentation_bu
Vanni Vipp2010 presentation_buhansvanni
 
Vanni Vipp2010 presentation_bu
Vanni Vipp2010 presentation_buVanni Vipp2010 presentation_bu
Vanni Vipp2010 presentation_buhansvanni
 

Ähnlich wie Pei electrophysiological measures of low level vision reveal spatial deficits and hemispheric asymmetry in autism spectrum disorder (20)

Wilkinson_et_al-2016-Brain_and_Behavior
Wilkinson_et_al-2016-Brain_and_BehaviorWilkinson_et_al-2016-Brain_and_Behavior
Wilkinson_et_al-2016-Brain_and_Behavior
 
The risk of cognitive impairment assosiated with congenital deafness in child...
The risk of cognitive impairment assosiated with congenital deafness in child...The risk of cognitive impairment assosiated with congenital deafness in child...
The risk of cognitive impairment assosiated with congenital deafness in child...
 
Perception of shapes targeting local and globalprocesses in .docx
Perception of shapes targeting local and globalprocesses in .docxPerception of shapes targeting local and globalprocesses in .docx
Perception of shapes targeting local and globalprocesses in .docx
 
Autism review article
Autism review articleAutism review article
Autism review article
 
Infancy and autism: Progress, prospects, and challenges
Infancy and autism: Progress, prospects, and challengesInfancy and autism: Progress, prospects, and challenges
Infancy and autism: Progress, prospects, and challenges
 
Memory for Intentions Screening Test
Memory for Intentions Screening TestMemory for Intentions Screening Test
Memory for Intentions Screening Test
 
Dermatoglyphic anomalies and neurocognitive deficits in sibling
Dermatoglyphic anomalies and neurocognitive deficits in siblingDermatoglyphic anomalies and neurocognitive deficits in sibling
Dermatoglyphic anomalies and neurocognitive deficits in sibling
 
ANT Paper In Sage.Pdf
ANT Paper In Sage.PdfANT Paper In Sage.Pdf
ANT Paper In Sage.Pdf
 
Efficacy of Sensory and Motor Interventions for Children with Autism
Efficacy of Sensory and Motor Interventions for Children with AutismEfficacy of Sensory and Motor Interventions for Children with Autism
Efficacy of Sensory and Motor Interventions for Children with Autism
 
Sensory Enrichment Therapy Second RCT Design Study
Sensory Enrichment Therapy Second RCT Design StudySensory Enrichment Therapy Second RCT Design Study
Sensory Enrichment Therapy Second RCT Design Study
 
Holt et al. (2015) NeuroImageClinical Looming Controls and Patients
Holt et al. (2015) NeuroImageClinical Looming Controls and PatientsHolt et al. (2015) NeuroImageClinical Looming Controls and Patients
Holt et al. (2015) NeuroImageClinical Looming Controls and Patients
 
1-s2.0-S1878929319303378-main.pdf
1-s2.0-S1878929319303378-main.pdf1-s2.0-S1878929319303378-main.pdf
1-s2.0-S1878929319303378-main.pdf
 
Visual Dysfunction in Parkinson Disease
Visual Dysfunction in Parkinson DiseaseVisual Dysfunction in Parkinson Disease
Visual Dysfunction in Parkinson Disease
 
Jocn.2009
Jocn.2009Jocn.2009
Jocn.2009
 
Mirella Dapretto, PhD: Sensory Over-Responsivity in ASD: Insights from Neuroi...
Mirella Dapretto, PhD: Sensory Over-Responsivity in ASD: Insights from Neuroi...Mirella Dapretto, PhD: Sensory Over-Responsivity in ASD: Insights from Neuroi...
Mirella Dapretto, PhD: Sensory Over-Responsivity in ASD: Insights from Neuroi...
 
The Etiology Of Autism Essay
The Etiology Of Autism EssayThe Etiology Of Autism Essay
The Etiology Of Autism Essay
 
A-V-P300 Response Control 8-11-13
A-V-P300 Response Control 8-11-13A-V-P300 Response Control 8-11-13
A-V-P300 Response Control 8-11-13
 
Literatür1
Literatür1Literatür1
Literatür1
 
Vanni Vipp2010 presentation_bu
Vanni Vipp2010 presentation_buVanni Vipp2010 presentation_bu
Vanni Vipp2010 presentation_bu
 
Vanni Vipp2010 presentation_bu
Vanni Vipp2010 presentation_buVanni Vipp2010 presentation_bu
Vanni Vipp2010 presentation_bu
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

KeyBio pipeline for bioinformatics and data science
KeyBio pipeline for bioinformatics and data scienceKeyBio pipeline for bioinformatics and data science
KeyBio pipeline for bioinformatics and data scienceLayne Sadler
 
Thermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jets
Thermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jetsThermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jets
Thermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jetsSérgio Sacani
 
soft skills question paper set for bba ca
soft skills question paper set for bba casoft skills question paper set for bba ca
soft skills question paper set for bba caohsadfeeling
 
Alternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabus
Alternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabusAlternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabus
Alternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabusPradnya Wadekar
 
Pests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPR
Pests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPRPests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPR
Pests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPRPirithiRaju
 
Gender board diversity spillovers and the public eye
Gender board diversity spillovers and the public eyeGender board diversity spillovers and the public eye
Gender board diversity spillovers and the public eyeGRAPE
 
Excavation Methods in Archaeological Research & Studies
Excavation Methods in Archaeological Research &  StudiesExcavation Methods in Archaeological Research &  Studies
Excavation Methods in Archaeological Research & StudiesPrachya Adhyayan
 
3.2 Pests of Sorghum_Identification, Symptoms and nature of damage, Binomics,...
3.2 Pests of Sorghum_Identification, Symptoms and nature of damage, Binomics,...3.2 Pests of Sorghum_Identification, Symptoms and nature of damage, Binomics,...
3.2 Pests of Sorghum_Identification, Symptoms and nature of damage, Binomics,...PirithiRaju
 
CW marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docx
CW  marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docxCW  marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docx
CW marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docxmarwaahmad357
 
Bureau of Indian Standards Specification of Shampoo.pptx
Bureau of Indian Standards Specification of Shampoo.pptxBureau of Indian Standards Specification of Shampoo.pptx
Bureau of Indian Standards Specification of Shampoo.pptxkastureyashashree
 
Identification of Superclusters and Their Properties in the Sloan Digital Sky...
Identification of Superclusters and Their Properties in the Sloan Digital Sky...Identification of Superclusters and Their Properties in the Sloan Digital Sky...
Identification of Superclusters and Their Properties in the Sloan Digital Sky...Sérgio Sacani
 
Genomics and Bioinformatics basics from genome to phenome
Genomics and Bioinformatics basics from genome to phenomeGenomics and Bioinformatics basics from genome to phenome
Genomics and Bioinformatics basics from genome to phenomeAjay Kumar Mahato
 
Exploration Method’s in Archaeological Studies & Research
Exploration Method’s in Archaeological Studies & ResearchExploration Method’s in Archaeological Studies & Research
Exploration Method’s in Archaeological Studies & ResearchPrachya Adhyayan
 
Application of Foraminiferal Ecology- Rahul.pptx
Application of Foraminiferal Ecology- Rahul.pptxApplication of Foraminiferal Ecology- Rahul.pptx
Application of Foraminiferal Ecology- Rahul.pptxRahulVishwakarma71547
 
Pests of tenai_Identification,Binomics_Dr.UPR
Pests of tenai_Identification,Binomics_Dr.UPRPests of tenai_Identification,Binomics_Dr.UPR
Pests of tenai_Identification,Binomics_Dr.UPRPirithiRaju
 
Pests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdfPirithiRaju
 
Basic Concepts in Pharmacology in molecular .pptx
Basic Concepts in Pharmacology in molecular  .pptxBasic Concepts in Pharmacology in molecular  .pptx
Basic Concepts in Pharmacology in molecular .pptxVijayaKumarR28
 
Gene transfer in plants agrobacterium.pdf
Gene transfer in plants agrobacterium.pdfGene transfer in plants agrobacterium.pdf
Gene transfer in plants agrobacterium.pdfNetHelix
 
001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...
001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...
001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...marwaahmad357
 
World Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlab
World Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlabWorld Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlab
World Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlabkiyorndlab
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

KeyBio pipeline for bioinformatics and data science
KeyBio pipeline for bioinformatics and data scienceKeyBio pipeline for bioinformatics and data science
KeyBio pipeline for bioinformatics and data science
 
Thermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jets
Thermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jetsThermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jets
Thermonuclear explosions on neutron stars reveal the speed of their jets
 
soft skills question paper set for bba ca
soft skills question paper set for bba casoft skills question paper set for bba ca
soft skills question paper set for bba ca
 
Alternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabus
Alternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabusAlternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabus
Alternative system of medicine herbal drug technology syllabus
 
Pests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPR
Pests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPRPests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPR
Pests of ragi_Identification, Binomics_Dr.UPR
 
Gender board diversity spillovers and the public eye
Gender board diversity spillovers and the public eyeGender board diversity spillovers and the public eye
Gender board diversity spillovers and the public eye
 
Excavation Methods in Archaeological Research & Studies
Excavation Methods in Archaeological Research &  StudiesExcavation Methods in Archaeological Research &  Studies
Excavation Methods in Archaeological Research & Studies
 
3.2 Pests of Sorghum_Identification, Symptoms and nature of damage, Binomics,...
3.2 Pests of Sorghum_Identification, Symptoms and nature of damage, Binomics,...3.2 Pests of Sorghum_Identification, Symptoms and nature of damage, Binomics,...
3.2 Pests of Sorghum_Identification, Symptoms and nature of damage, Binomics,...
 
CW marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docx
CW  marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docxCW  marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docx
CW marking grid Analytical BS - M Ahmad.docx
 
Bureau of Indian Standards Specification of Shampoo.pptx
Bureau of Indian Standards Specification of Shampoo.pptxBureau of Indian Standards Specification of Shampoo.pptx
Bureau of Indian Standards Specification of Shampoo.pptx
 
Identification of Superclusters and Their Properties in the Sloan Digital Sky...
Identification of Superclusters and Their Properties in the Sloan Digital Sky...Identification of Superclusters and Their Properties in the Sloan Digital Sky...
Identification of Superclusters and Their Properties in the Sloan Digital Sky...
 
Genomics and Bioinformatics basics from genome to phenome
Genomics and Bioinformatics basics from genome to phenomeGenomics and Bioinformatics basics from genome to phenome
Genomics and Bioinformatics basics from genome to phenome
 
Exploration Method’s in Archaeological Studies & Research
Exploration Method’s in Archaeological Studies & ResearchExploration Method’s in Archaeological Studies & Research
Exploration Method’s in Archaeological Studies & Research
 
Application of Foraminiferal Ecology- Rahul.pptx
Application of Foraminiferal Ecology- Rahul.pptxApplication of Foraminiferal Ecology- Rahul.pptx
Application of Foraminiferal Ecology- Rahul.pptx
 
Pests of tenai_Identification,Binomics_Dr.UPR
Pests of tenai_Identification,Binomics_Dr.UPRPests of tenai_Identification,Binomics_Dr.UPR
Pests of tenai_Identification,Binomics_Dr.UPR
 
Pests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of wheat_Identification, Bionomics, Damage symptoms, IPM_Dr.UPR.pdf
 
Basic Concepts in Pharmacology in molecular .pptx
Basic Concepts in Pharmacology in molecular  .pptxBasic Concepts in Pharmacology in molecular  .pptx
Basic Concepts in Pharmacology in molecular .pptx
 
Gene transfer in plants agrobacterium.pdf
Gene transfer in plants agrobacterium.pdfGene transfer in plants agrobacterium.pdf
Gene transfer in plants agrobacterium.pdf
 
001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...
001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...
001 Case Study - Submission Point_c1051231_attempt_2023-11-23-14-08-42_ABS CW...
 
World Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlab
World Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlabWorld Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlab
World Water Day 22 March 2024 - kiyorndlab
 

Pei electrophysiological measures of low level vision reveal spatial deficits and hemispheric asymmetry in autism spectrum disorder

  • 1. Electrophysiological measures of low-level vision reveal spatial processing deficits and hemispheric asymmetry in autism spectrum disorder Francesca Pei # $ Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Stanford Autism Center at Packard Children’s Hospital, Department of Psychiatric, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Stefano Baldassi # $ Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology, and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy Anthony M. Norcia # $ Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA There is accumulating evidence from electrophysiological studies that low-level visual processing is atypical in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Abnormalities in early stages of sensory processing are of interest because they could lead to downstream functional deficits in social or cognitive domains. Using steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs), we studied how well spatial information is transmitted over a wide range of spatial frequencies (2–30 cycles/deg), including those at the limit of visibility (visual acuity). SSVEPs were recorded over 128 channels in 16 ASD participants between 5 and 17 years old and 17 age-matched, neurotypical (NT) participants. We observed a selective reduction of the amplitude of the SSVEP second harmonic pattern reversal response between 5 and 17 cycles/deg. Responses measured at the fourth harmonic were normal at all spatial frequencies tested, as were responses at the lowest and highest spatial frequencies at the second harmonic. The reduction of second harmonic responses occurred preferentially over right occipital electrodes. Because response abnormalities are restricted to a specific response harmonic and to specific ranges of spatial frequency, we can rule out nonspecific differences between the ASD participants and the NT controls. This particular pattern of loss, combined with the observed exaggeration of the loss over the right hemisphere, suggests that a highly specific neural substrate early in the visual pathway is compromised in ASD. Introduction Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevel- opmental disorder characterized by impairment of communication skills and social interaction and by repetitive patterns of stereotyped behaviors. In addition to these core deficits, a variety of sensory abnormalities have been described in ASD patients since the discovery of the disorder. Early reports noted that the response to sensory stimuli in ASD was similar to that in deaf–blind children (Kanner, 1943; Wing, 1969). Later studies reported a high rate of sensory abnor- malities, mostly on the basis of questionnaires admin- istered to the parents (Baranek, David, Poe, Stone, & Watson, 2006; Klintwall et al., 2011). Such abnormal- ities have been described across all sensory domains (Marco, Hinkley, Hill, & Nagarajan, 2011). One study (Leekam, Nieto, Libby, Wing, & Gould, 2007) reported that up to 90% of individuals with ASD show tactile, auditory, or visual hypersensitivity or hyposensitivity. Because sensory symptoms and abnormal reactions to sensory stimuli are so common, they are now part of the diagnostic criteria for ASD in the fifth edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2000a). Citation: Pei, F., Baldassi, S., & Norcia, A. M. (2014). Electrophysiological measures of low-level vision reveal spatial processing deficits and hemispheric asymmetry in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Vision, 14(11):3, 1–12, http://www.journalofvision. org/content/14/11/3, doi:10.1167/14.11.3. Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 1http://www.journalofvision.org/content/14/11/3 doi: 10.1167/14.11.3 ISSN 1534-7362 Ó 2014 ARVOReceived November 3, 2013; published September 5, 2014
  • 2. The high prevalence of sensory disturbances in ASDs has led to the suggestion that at least some of the high- level deficits in social interaction and communication in ASDs could be explained in terms of downstream consequences of lower-level sensory and perceptual abnormalities (Behrmann et al., 2006; Caron, Mottron, Berthiaume, & Dawson, 2006). Abnormal visual perception in ASDs on performance-based assessment was first demonstrated as a local versus global feature- integration bias (Happe, 1996; Mottron & Belleville, 1993; Pei et al., 2009; Plaisted, O’Riordan, & Baron- Cohen, 1998; Plaisted, Swettenham, & Rees, 1999). People with ASD showed a strong bias for details and local characteristics of the task in tests such as the embedded figure test (Jolliffe & Baron-Cohen, 1997; Shah & Frith, 1983) or the block design subtest of the Wechsler intelligence quotient (IQ) battery (Shah & Frith, 1983; Venter, Lord, & Schopler, 1992). These reports of superior visual performance in ASD contributed to the development of the weak central coherence hypothesis (Frith, 1989) and the enhanced perceptual functioning hypothesis (Mottron et al., 2006) of ASD. The local bias effect led researchers to focus on visual search, a task that ASD observers seem to perform with less or no influence of the number of distractors (O’Riordan & Passetti, 2006; O’Riordan, Plaisted, Driver, & Baron-Cohen, 2001), possibly due to diminished peripheral visual crowding (Baldassi et al., 2009) that in turn fits with the difficulties ASD observers experience in visual integration tasks. How- ever, it has been argued that the deficit of global form processing in autism is far from understood because of a lack of studies using stimuli that control for the presence of low spatial frequency structure in the test material (Dakin & Frith, 2005). Subsequent research (Milne et al., 2002, 2006; Pellicano, Gibson, Maybery, Durkin, & Badcock, 2005; Spencer et al., 2000) found elevated thresholds in ASD on coherent motion tasks in which sensitivity to motion is determined on the basis of the fraction of coherently moving dots needed by the observer to discriminate the direction of motion. Because motion direction cannot be estimated on the basis of small regions of a coherent motion display, this task is believed to tap global processing mechanisms in the extrastriate cortex (Newsome & Pare, 1988; Williams & Sekuler, 1984). Bertone, Mottron, Jelenic, and Faubert (2003) de- scribed deficits in second-order motion that were interpreted as a deficit in the perception of complex stimuli rather than as a deficit in the early detector along the magnocellular stream. However, direction discrimination thresholds are elevated for moving gratings in ASD participants and their siblings, suggesting that lower-level motion processing is, in fact abnormal and may be a genetically mediated risk factor for ASD (Koh, Milne, & Dobkins, 2010a). The integrity of low-level spatial mechanisms that feed higher-order visual processes has been less well studied. The spatial frequency hypothesis in ASD proposes that the detail-oriented bias in ASD reflects enhanced sensitivity to high spatial frequencies or a reduced sensitivity to low spatial frequencies (Behr- mann et al., 2006; Kemner & van Engeland, 2006; Milne et al., 2002). The studies performed based on this hypothesis have used widely differing techniques to measure visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, and the results have been at least partially inconsistent (for a review see Koh et al., 2010a, b). For example, a recent study measured visual acuity, triggering a debate about the possibility of a supernormal acuity—within the range of predator birds—in ASD (Ashwin, Ashwin, Rhydderch, Howells, & Baron-Cohen, 2009). However, the methodology used in that study has been ques- tioned and has led to several follow-up studies that did not replicate the effect (Bach & Dakin, 2009; Bolte et al., 2012; Crewther & Sutherland, 2009). Visual acuity is just one aspect of spatial contrast sensitivity. Several behavioral studies have measured contrast sensitivity thresholds at different spatial frequencies and have found no significant difference between ASD and neurotypical (NT) age-matched controls (Behrmann et al., 2006; Bertone & Faubert, 2003; Bertone, Mottron, Jelenic, & Faubert, 2005; Koh, Milne, & Dobkins, 2010b; Pellicano et al., 2005). In contrast to these results, lower thresholds have been found in a high-risk population of 6-month-old siblings of children with ASD (McCleery, Allman, Carver, & Dobkins, 2007). Behavioral spatial acuity and contrast sensitivity measures appear to be largely unaffected in ASD, but tasks involving more integrative processing are adversely affected. Electrophysiological recordings are particularly use- ful in neurodevelopmental disorders as measures of sensory processing because they do not require any task performance or language/comprehension abilities. Event-related potential (ERP) data show specific neural abnormalities in ASD that are related to low-level visual processing. ERP responses for Navon stimuli and motion stimuli have been compared by Sutherland and Crewther (2010) in people with high scores on the autism spectrum quotient (AQ), a scale that measures the prevalence of behaviors associated with ASD (Baron-Cohen, Wheelwright, Skinner, Martin, & Clubley, 2001; Brugha et al., 2012). The AQ is correlated with scores on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS), the current research standard for the diagnosis of ASD, but it is only weakly predictive of criterion scores for ASD. Participants with high AQ scores showed weaker initial cortical responses to low-contrast stimuli and diminished identification of the global components in the Navon task. This was interpreted as a delay in primary visual/ Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, & Norcia 2
  • 3. prestriate cortical processing of magnocellular input (Sutherland & Crewther, 2010). A follow-up study in a similar participant group also found deficits in the earliest recordable response components and larger- than-normal responses when measured over a range of contrasts (Jackson et al., 2013). The ERP in an object boundary detection paradigm was found to be abnor- mal in ASD, with differences emerging as early as 120 ms after stimulus presentation (Vandenbroucke, Scholte, van Engeland, Lamme, & Kemner, 2008), implying a deficit in early to midlevel cortical process- ing stages. Using Gabor patches of different spatial frequencies, Milne, Scope, Pascalis, Buckley, and Makeig (2009) found a general reduction in latency for the ASD group but also a more specific increase in low a-band power in the components located in or near the left cingulate gyrus in the participants with ASD, suggesting that different low-level strategies were used during the task by ASD versus typical participants. ERP abnormalities have been found in the process- ing of suprathreshold spatial frequency gratings. ERP alterations at 6 cycles/deg (cpd) were found in the N80 component, while atypical processing of both high- and low-frequency gratings occurred later in the P100 response (Boeschoten, Kenemans, van Engeland, & Kemner, 2007). Jemel, Mimeault, Saint-Amour, Ho- sein, and Mottron (2010) recorded visual evoked potentials (VEPs) from vertical sinusoidal achromatic gratings at different spatial frequencies. The N80 component elicited by grating from 2.8 to 8 cpd was smaller at low contrast levels in ASD versus control groups. Taken together, the ERP results suggest that suprathreshold processing at very early stages of the visual pathway may be disrupted in ASD. To further quantify the extent to which very low- level visual deficits may be present in ASD, we measured steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) in response to a wide range of spatial frequencies using the sweep technique (Norcia & Tyler, 1985). This method has several advantages for use in populations with neurodevelopmental disorders. It can be used to estimate sensory thresholds (e.g., the limits of neuronal performance) as well as responsiveness at suprathreshold levels and, importantly, it does not require observers to engage in behavioral tasks, potentially increasing its application over a greater range of severities in clinical populations. The use of grating stimuli reduces the complexity of visual processing to the minimum level, and an analysis of the SSVEP scalp topography from high-density electroen- cephalography (EEG) recordings allows us to make a rough assessment as to whether the underlying generators of the response lie in the early visual cortex. ASD participants show reductions in the VEP response recorded over the early visual cortex to a specific range of spatial frequencies (approximately 5– 17 cpd), and these reductions are restricted to a specific temporal component of the VEP recording, the second harmonic. We also find a relative reduction of signal amplitude over the right hemisphere. These differences in the way spatial frequency information is processed in the autistic brain suggest that early cortical mechanisms are altered in ASD. Taken together, the patterns of deficit we observe may constitute a biomarker for ASD. Methods and materials Participants Sixteen children with ASD (5–17 years old; mean age ¼ 9.2 years) participated in the study. They were recruited through the Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford, the Interactive Autism Network at Autism Speaks, and local parents’ associations. The diagnosis of ASD was made on the basis of the fourth edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2000b) since at the time of the assessment the fifth edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders had not been published. Each diagnosis was confirmed by an experienced clinician using the ADOS instrument (Lord et al., 1989). Subjects with mental retardation due to genetic and neurological pathology of other kinds were excluded from the study. Control partici- pants were typically developing, age-matched children (n¼17; mean age¼8.6 years) with no history of serious medical, psychiatric, or neurological conditions who were recruited through local schools. Because SSVEP testing involves no instructions or tasks, is relatively unaffected by attention, and is not affected by IQ (as is a measure used in infants), we did not match the participants on cognitive level. Because SSVEP grating acuity is adult-like at age 5 (Norcia & Manny, 2003; Norcia & Tyler, 1985), we pooled the results across all ages. All participants had normal or correct-to-normal vision, as also confirmed by the results of the study. Informed consent was obtained from a parent or guardian of the child, and an assent was signed by the participant whenever possible. The Institutional Re- view Board at Stanford University approved the experimental protocol. Experimental paradigm Vertical, sine-wave luminance gratings were pre- sented as gray-scale images on a contrast-linearized cathode ray tube (CRT) (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA) 1600 · 1200 pixels and a vertical refresh rate of 72 Hz over a field size of 378 by 288 at a mean luminance of Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, & Norcia 3
  • 4. 50 cd/m2 . The gratings were presented at 80% contrast and were contrast reversed with a square-wave temporal profile at 7.5 Hz. The contrast reversal was precisely synchronized to the vertical refresh rate of the monitor (60 Hz). The participants sat at a viewing distance of 1.5 m and were asked to look at the center of the screen for the duration of individual trials that lasted 12.8 s. When necessary, a researcher stood behind the screen while holding a control device to stop recording when the subject was not fixating in the center of the screen. The fixation was monitored by observing the centration of the corneal reflection of the display monitor in the participants’ pupils. This measure is accurate to approximately 48, a small fraction of the grating display area (Allen, Tyler, & Norcia, 1996). We used a steady-state sweep VEP technique that has been used many times before to measure spatial frequency response functions both in NT infants, children, and adults and in clinical populations (Almoqbel, Leat, & Irving, 2008; Norcia & Manny, 2003). Following typical practice, the spatial frequency of the grating was swept in equal linear increments (10) over trials lasting 12 s. The spatial frequency range (2– 30 cpd) was chosen based on previous studies using adults and older children as one that would span the full range between very visible and invisible, including the acuity range (Norcia & Manny, 2003; Skoczenski & Norcia, 1999). The trial began with 1 s of an unrecorded flickering 2-cpd grating in order to avoid artifacts from the transient stimulus onset. Ten trials were recorded for each subject, and all 10 trials in both groups were used for the final analysis. VEP recording and analysis The EEG data were collected using a 128-channel HydroCell Geodesic Sensor Net (Electrical Geodesics Inc., Eugene, OR), bandpass filtered from 0.1 to 50 Hz and digitized at a rate of 432 Hz (Net Amps 300 TM, Electrical Geodesics). Individual electrodes were ad- justed until impedances were below 60 kX before starting the recording. Artifact rejection was performed off-line according to a sample-by-sample threshold procedure to remove noisy electrodes and replace them with the average of the six nearest neighboring electrodes. The EEG was then rereferenced to the common average of all the remaining electrodes. Epochs with more than 20% of the data samples exceeding 100 lV were excluded on a sensor-by-sensor basis; this is the criterion used for normal adults. Typically, these epochs included eye movements or blinks. The 7.5-Hz pattern reversal response is an SSVEP and is traditionally analyzed in the frequency domain via Fourier analysis. The SSVEP amplitude in each 1-s epoch corresponding to the spatial frequency steps in the stimulus sweep was determined by a discrete Fourier transform (Norcia & Tyler, 1985). Within a subject, the amplitude and phase values were averaged coherently (i.e., the average considered both phase and amplitude values) over the 10 trials recorded in each participant. Thresholds in the sweep VEP method were estimated subject by subject by extrapolating amplitude versus spatial frequency function to zero amplitude. Group-average spatial frequency response functions for the ASD and NT participants were formed by incoherently averaging (using amplitudes only) the individual subject amplitudes recorded at the second (15 Hz) and fourth (30 Hz) harmonics of the stimulus temporal frequency. Acuity estimation Grating acuity was estimated from the spatial frequency response functions by regressing the VEP amplitude versus spatial frequency function to zero amplitude using criteria described in detail in previous publications (Norcia, Clarke, & Tyler, 1985; Norcia & Tyler, 1985). Briefly, an automatic scoring algorithm searched the VEP record, starting from the highest spatial frequency bin, for sections of the record that exceeded a statistical criterion for the presence of an evoked response that was monotonically increasing with decreasing spatial frequency and whose phase was either constant or decreasing in delay. Using this search criterion, an approximately linear portion of the suprathreshold response function was selected for the regression to zero amplitude. Results As is typical of steady-state pattern-reversal re- sponses (Regan, 1989), the recorded SSVEPs were dominated by even harmonic response components. Here reliable responses were consistently present at both the second (15 Hz) and fourth (30 Hz) harmonics. As can be seen in Figure 1, each harmonic component was distributed over electrodes centered on the occipital pole. SSVEP amplitudes were maximal at the Oz electrode in both the NT and ASD groups. Because the focus of activity at Oz in both groups was maximal, we quantified the differences between groups as a function of spatial frequency and response harmonics at three electrodes—occipital channels O1, Oz, and O2—that are centered on the maximum. Figure 2 shows the group-average spatial frequency tuning functions at each of these channels for the Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, & Norcia 4
  • 5. Figure 1. Topographic maps of the vector-average spectral amplitude collapsed across all spatial frequencies at the second and fourth harmonics for both NT and ASD participants. Figure 2. Amplitude of the sweep VEPs for the second harmonic (top) and the fourth harmonic (bottom) for three locations on the scalp: O1 (left), Oz (Baca et al., 2009), and O2 (right). Electrodes are placed according to the 10-10 channels system map. Each graph shows spatial frequency tuning functions for NT (filled circles) and ASD (open squares) observers. Error bars report the standard error of the mean. Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, & Norcia 5
  • 6. second and fourth harmonics in the top and bottom panels, respectively. The open squares plot data from the ASD group, and the filled circles plot data from the NT observers. The second harmonic spatial frequency tuning function had a peak at ;8 cpd in the NT group and a second limb above ;15 cpd, consistent with previous results with similar stimuli (Parry, Murray, & Hadjize- nonos, 1999; Strasburger, Murray, & Remky, 1993). At each electrode, second harmonic amplitudes were lower in the ASD group between 5 and 17 cpd. ASD and NT amplitudes were similar outside of this range of spatial frequencies and at all spatial frequencies at the fourth harmonic. Second harmonic response amplitude at the spatial frequency of the largest response in the NT group was 30% to 40% larger than it was in the ASD group at Oz (p ¼ 0.087) and was more than a factor of two larger at O2 (p ¼ 0.01). Responses at O1 were not significantly different (p ¼ 0.35). The peak spatial frequency of the fourth harmonic function was slightly lower (5 cpd) in both groups, but there was no difference in amplitude at any of the electrodes. The locations of the peaks and the results of two-tailed t-tests for each harmonic and electrode are indicated in Figure 2 by the arrows with corresponding p-values. The top-center panel also plots the average grating acuity thresholds (the two isolated points with error along the x-axis) calculated from individual-participant vector-averaged functions, along with the standard error of the mean. Grating acuities did not differ between the ASD and NT groups (25.8 6 1.47 cpd in the NT group and 24.6 6 1.99 cpd in the ASD group, p ¼ 0.11, ns). To confirm that the reported significant differences between groups were not due to a small number of individual participants in either group or unequal variance between groups and to show the power of the statistical effects, we compared the group differences on 10,000 bootstrap samples of the two groups. This allowed us to create a distribution-free, empirical sampling distribution that we used to confirm the difference we report from conventional t-tests. Table 1 summarizes the statistical analysis per- formed. For each electrode and harmonic (first and second columns from left, respectively), we report the output of our two-tailed t-tests. The third column from left reports the degrees of freedom (df), which is always 31 except for the second harmonic at O2. In this specific condition the data do not fulfill the assumption of homoscedasticity and the results are corrected accord- ing to Levene’s test for equality of variances. The central column (t) reports the value of t, while the column labeled p reports the p-values returned com- paring the empirical data. We also performed the same comparisons on log-transformed data because this transformation equalized the variances between groups. Each of these comparisons showed p-values equal to or smaller than those reported in Table 1. The two rightmost columns in Figure 2 report the power, measured as the proportion of significant t-test comparisons, and the median p-value. In particular, the power column clearly indicates that the difference grows steadily only in the second harmonic by moving the recording site from left to right, and the t-test is very powerful for electrode O2. At the fourth harmonic the channel showing the largest trend was significant in only about 12% of the bootstrap samples, implying no difference between groups at this harmonic. Discussion SSVEP responses show that ASD has a highly specific effect on the processing of spatial information in the early visual cortex. The effect we observe is restricted to a subset of the full range of spatial frequencies tested and to the second harmonic. There are no group-level differences at any spatial frequency at the fourth harmonic. Our results are particularly clear on the specifically visual and neural nature of the difference because the selectivity of the deficits rules out nonspecific group-level differences in quality of fixa- tion, accommodation, or motion artifacts. Each of these possible sources of group differences should affect both the second and fourth harmonics because they affect either the quality of the input or the quality of Electrode Harmonic df t p Power Median p O1 (left) Second 31 À0.944 0.353 0.167 0.303 Fourth 31 0.986 0.332 0.125 0.302 Oz (central) Second 31 À1.767 0.087 0.409 0.079 Fourth 31 0.698 0.491 0.088 0.389 O2 (right) Second 24.34 À2.759 0.011 0.782 0.009 Fourth 31 À0.391 0.699 0.072 0.461 Table 1. Results of the three 2-tailed t-test comparisons of peak amplitudes between groups for each of the three channels and for each of the two harmonics considered (second column). Levene’s test of homoscedasticity was significant only at O2 for the second harmonic component (degrees of freedom corrected accordingly). The two rightmost columns report the power measured as the proportion of significant t-test comparison. Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, & Norcia 6
  • 7. the evoked potential recording equivalently. Similarly, variations in attention between the groups would be unlikely to explain differences between the two harmonics because they are measured simultaneously from the same data record. Two previous behavioral studies (Behrmann et al., 2006; Koh et al., 2010b) made detailed measurements of contrast sensitivity over the range of spatial frequencies where we found second harmonic deficits (5–17 cpd). These studies found no differences in threshold sensitivity between ASD and NT controls. It is possible that the effects we observe are restricted to high levels of sensory input and may thus reflect a failure of the regulation of contrast gain rather than changes in absolute sensitivity. What might underlie the specific loss seen at the second harmonic? A previous SSVEP spatial frequency tuning study suggested that the second harmonic of the SSVEP pattern reversal response is generated by separate channels operating at lower versus higher spatial frequencies (Strasburger et al., 1993). Our results are consistent with separate spatial processing mechanisms because the response at 2 cpd is normal but the response over the range of 8.2 to 14.4 cpd is not. However, this cannot be the whole story. First, we find another range of spatial frequencies above the limit of Strasburger et al.’s (1993) higher spatial frequency mechanism where responses are normal. This suggests the presence of a third spatial channel. Second, our channel properties are not strictly determined by their spatial frequency tuning: The fourth harmonic response component shows no effect over the entire range. Given the mass nature of the SSVEP, it is likely that multiple underlying generators contribute to the recorded signal. Our results indicate that a subset of these multiple generators is specifically affected by ASD. It will be important in future research to determine the underly- ing neural substrates that contribute to the second and fourth harmonics in order to pinpoint the neural basis of the ASD deficit we have observed. Visual acuity By recording SSVEPs over a wide range of spatial frequencies, we were also able to objectively estimate the visual acuity threshold without the task demands of psychophysical experiments. We found no difference in grating acuity in the ASD and control groups, consistent with the results of more recent behavioral studies (Bach & Dakin, 2009; Tavassoli, Latham, Bach, Dakin, & Baron-Cohen, 2011). These results further reinforce that the two groups were equally able to comply with the task demands for fixation and accommodation despite the absence of a requirement for performance of a specific behavioral task. Hemispheric asymmetry Another important result of the present study is the selective reduction of the SSVEP response over the right hemisphere. Right-hemisphere deficits in VEP responses have been reported in a previous study. The evoked response to photic stimulation over the right occipital cortex was depressed when measured at 11 fixed temporal frequencies (3–24 Hz) in a group of children aged 6 to 14 years with the diagnosis of autism without significant mental retardation (Lazarev, Pon- tes, & deAzevedo, 2009). Our findings confirm and extend this previous report of right-hemisphere alter- ations of the visual response in ASD. Additional evidence for right-hemisphere sensory deficits comes from a magnetoencephalography study on auditory processing (Orekhova et al., 2012). Orekhova et al. (2012) found a relationship between the severity of the sensory modulation abnormalities and the lack of normal rightward lateralization of P100 in ASD children. The right hemisphere in autistic people also fails to respond to auditory temporal novelty (Ore- khova et al., 2009). Finally, broadband EEG power has an abnormal distribution suggestive of a loss in the right hemisphere when measured in boys with autism between 3 and 8 years old (Stroganova et al., 2007). At the behavioral level, abnormal brain lateralization has also been implicated in an eye tracking study performed in a group at high risk for ASD (infant siblings of children with an ASD diagnosis). High-risk infants did not show a left visual field fixation bias like the one displayed by low-risk infants (Dundas, Gastgeb, & Strauss, 2012). Typically developing children prefer- entially fixate the left part of the face. Information from the left visual field is projected to the right hemisphere, which is known to be associated with face processing abilities, with notable lateralization in the right fusiform gyrus (Haxby, Hoffman, & Gobbini, 2000). Vulnerability of one hemisphere versus another may be due to the two cerebral hemispheres having different developmental trajectories in normal development: The right hemisphere develops more quickly during typical fetal development (Geschwind & Galaburda, 1985; Hellige, 1993). Differential developmental sequences may expose the two hemispheres differentially to environ- mental influences or may indicate that separate genetic programs control the development of the two hemi- spheres. The ASD phenotype we observe could result from either of these two factors or a combination of both. Relationship of the present findings to higher- level visual cognition Studying the early visual system can provide information on brain circuitry as well as on the extent Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, & Norcia 7
  • 8. to which low-level visual anomalies may influence higher-level vision and cognition. The visual world contains a wide range of spatial scales that constantly change while we are moving closer to or farther away from objects. The difficulty of processing visual targets can be predicted in typically developed subjects by using the results of spatial contrast sensitivity tests (Owsley & Sloane, 1987). This relationship may, however, break down in autism, especially at high levels of input. The method used here to identify spatial processing deficits may be useful in determining whether certain spatial frequency bands contribute to deficits on other tasks, such as ones involving local and global dimensions (Blakemore & Campbell, 1969; Brady & Oliva, 2012). Several studies in this area have suggested that the processing of local and more global aspects of both hierarchical and face stimuli is related to the processing of specific spatial frequencies (Bad- cock, Whitworth, Badcock, & Lovegrove, 1990; Boeschoten, Kemner, Kenemans, & van Engeland, 2005; Goffaux, Gauthier, & Rossion, 2003; Goffaux, Hault, Michel, Vuong, & Rossion, 2005; Han, Yund, & Woods, 2003; Jemel, Mottron, & Dawson, 2006; LaGasse, 1993; Ruiz-Soler & Beltran, 2006). It would be informative to compare neural measures of spatial processing such as the ones performed here with behavioral ones to determine whether one is predictive of the other, as would be the case if the local processing bias of subjects with ASD for these and other visual stimuli is related to a pervasive abnormality in spatial frequency analysis (Deruelle, Rondan, Gepner, & Tardif, 2004; Plaisted, Dobler, Bell, & Davis, 2006). A challenge for future research is relating the suprathreshold processing deficits we have observed to behavioral responses. The SSVEP deficit we have observed is not simply a deficit at certain spatial frequencies. Some of the evoked response, that portion contained in the fourth harmonic, is not affected in ASD. Exactly what aspect of behavior would be associated with the fourth rather than the second harmonic is not completely clear at this point. What is needed is a better understanding of the nonlinear mechanisms that give rise to the SSVEP and further exploration of the full range of spatial and temporal frequencies that form the limits of spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity. Further inves- tigation of this topic is needed in order to better understand at which point of the neural pathway the deficits we observe are generated. It will also be important to determine whether the highly selective pattern of response alterations we have observed here is specific to ASD or whether it occurs in other forms of intellectual disability. This is particularly important to establish if one wishes to use quantitative neural measurements such as those presented here to guide treatment, intervention, and optimization of the stimulation used, especially given the proliferation of electronic device-based applications dedicated to a wide population of autistic users. Conclusions Our results add to the accumulating body of evidence suggesting that deficits at the earliest stages of sensory processing are associated with autism. Since the visual system is organized hierarchically, abnormalities in higher-level functions may be at least partially due to downstream effects of abnormalities occurring at earlier stages. Quantitative and efficient SSVEP mea- surements of low-level visual processing mechanisms may ultimately help us understand the overall abilities of people with ASD to interpret and make full sense of the visual world. Conversely, the specificity of the deficits we find is difficult to explain on the basis of deficits in higher-level cognitive functions such as language, task comprehension or performance issues, or IQ. Rather, our results point to what could be a very specific biological substrate that is altered in ASD. Key points: Sensory processing abnormalities are common in ASD. The visual system can be used as an entry point to study brain activity and system regulation. We can use task-absent VEP tests to study very low- level visual functions that can potentially provide new biomarkers for the diagnosis of the disorder early in life. The spatial processing abnormalities and the brain hemispheric asymmetry that we have found may undermine high-level cognitive functions and inter- fere with the child’s interaction with the visual world. Keywords: autism, vision, visual evoked potential, spatial frequency, visual perception Acknowledgments This work was supported by the Simons Foundation for Autism Research Initiative (SFARI) and by the Bass Society for Pediatric Scholars. We thank all the families and children who dedicated their time to help us with our research project. Commercial relationships: none. Corresponding author: Francesca Pei. Email: fpei@stanford.edu. Address: Department of Psychology, Stanford Uni- versity, Stanford, CA, USA. Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, Norcia 8
  • 9. References Allen, D., Tyler, C. W., Norcia, A. M. (1996). Development of grating acuity and contrast sensi- tivity in the central and peripheral visual field of the human infant. Vision Research, 36(13), 1945–1953. Almoqbel, F., Leat, S. J., Irving, E. (2008). The technique, validity and clinical use of the sweep VEP. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 28(5), 393–403, doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00591.x. American Psychiatric Association. (2000a). Diagnostic criteria from DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. American Psychiatric Association. (2000b). Electronic DSM-IV-TR plus [CD-ROM]. Ashwin, E., Ashwin, C., Rhydderch, D., Howells, J., Baron-Cohen, S. (2009). Eagle-eyed visual acuity: An experimental investigation of enhanced per- ception in autism. Biological Psychiatry, 65(1), 17– 21, doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.06.012. Baca, C. B., Cheng, E. M., Spencer, S. S., Vassar, S., Vickrey, B. G., Multicenter Study of Epilepsy Surgery. (2009). Racial differences in patient expectations prior to resective epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy and Behavior, 15(4), 452–455, doi:10.1016/ j.yebeh.2009.05.010. Bach, M., Dakin, S. C. (2009). Regarding ‘‘Eagle- eyed visual acuity: An experimental investigation of enhanced perception in autism.’’ Biological Psychi- atry, 66(10), e19–e20, doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009. 02.035. Badcock, J. C., Whitworth, F. A., Badcock, D. R., Lovegrove, W. J. (1990). Low-frequency filtering and the processing of local-global stimuli. Percep- tion, 19(5), 617–629. Baldassi, S., Pei, F., Megna, N., Recupero, G., Viespoli, M., Igliozzi, R., . . . Cioni, G. (2009). Search superiority in autism within, but not outside the crowding regime. Vision Research, 49(16), 2151–2156, doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.06.007. Baranek, G. T., David, F. J., Poe, M. D., Stone, W. L., Watson, L. R. (2006). Sensory Experiences Questionnaire: Discriminating sensory features in young children with autism, developmental delays, and typical development. Journal of Child Psy- chology and Psychiatry, 47(6), 591–601, doi:10. 1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01546.x. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/ high-functioning autism, males and females, scien- tists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5–17. Behrmann, M., Avidan, G., Leonard, G. L., Kimchi, R., Luna, B., Humphreys, K., Minshew, N. (2006). Configural processing in autism and its relationship to face processing. Neuropsychologia, 44(1), 110–129, doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia. 2005.04.002. Bertone, A., Faubert, J. (2003). How is complex second-order motion processed? Vision Research, 43(25), 2591–2601. Bertone, A., Mottron, L., Jelenic, P., Faubert, J. (2003). Motion perception in autism: A ‘‘complex’’ issue. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(2), 218– 225, doi:10.1162/089892903321208150. Bertone, A., Mottron, L., Jelenic, P., Faubert, J. (2005). Enhanced and diminished visuo-spatial information processing in autism depends on stimulus complexity. Brain, 128(Pt. 10), 2430–2441, doi:10.1093/brain/awh561. Blakemore, C., Campbell, F. W. (1969). Adaptation to spatial stimuli. Journal of Physiology, 200(1), 11P–13P. Boeschoten, M. A., Kemner, C., Kenemans, J. L., van Engeland, H. (2005). The relationship between local and global processing and the processing of high and low spatial frequencies studied by event- related potentials and source modeling. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research, 24(2), 228–236, doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.021. Boeschoten, M. A., Kenemans, J. L., van Engeland, H., Kemner, C. (2007). Abnormal spatial frequency processing in high-functioning children with per- vasive developmental disorder (PDD). Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(9), 2076–2088, doi:10.1016/j. clinph.2007.05.004. Bolte, S., Schlitt, S., Gapp, V., Hainz, D., Schirman, S., Poustka, F., . . . Walter, H. (2012). A close eye on the eagle-eyed visual acuity hypothesis of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(5), 726–733, doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1300-3. Brady, T. F., Oliva, A. (2012). Spatial frequency integration during active perception: Perceptual hysteresis when an object recedes. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 462,doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00462. Brugha, T. S., McManus, S., Smith, J., Scott, F. J., Meltzer, H., Purdon, S., . . . Bankart, J. (2012). Validating two survey methods for identifying cases of autism spectrum disorder among adults in the community. Psychological Medicine, 42(3), 647– 656, doi:10.1017/S0033291711001292. Caron, M. J., Mottron, L., Berthiaume, C., Dawson, M. (2006). Cognitive mechanisms, specificity and Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, Norcia 9
  • 10. neural underpinnings of visuospatial peaks in autism. Brain, 129(Pt. 7), 1789–1802, doi:10.1093/ brain/awl072. Crewther, D. P., Sutherland, A. (2009). The more he looked inside, the more Piglet wasn’t there: Is autism really blessed with visual hyperacuity? Biological Psychiatry, 66(10), e21–e22, doi:10.1016/ j.biopsych.2009.02.036. Dakin, S., Frith, U. (2005). Vagaries of visual perception in autism. Neuron, 48(3), 497–507, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.018. Deruelle, C., Rondan, C., Gepner, B., Tardif, C. (2004). Spatial frequency and face processing in children with autism and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 199–210. Dundas, E., Gastgeb, H., Strauss, M. S. (2012). Left visual field biases when infants process faces: A comparison of infants at high- and low-risk for autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(12), 2659–2668, doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1523-y. Geschwind, N., Galaburda, A. M. (1985). Cerebral lateralization. Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: III. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42(7), 634–654. Goffaux, V., Gauthier, I., Rossion, B. (2003). Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences be- tween face and object processing. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research, 16(3), 416–424. Goffaux, V., Hault, B., Michel, C., Vuong, Q. C., Rossion, B. (2005). The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces. Perception, 34(1), 77–86. Frith, U. (1989). Autism and ‘‘theory of mind.’’ In C. Gillberg (Ed.), Diagnosis and treatment of autism (pp. 33–52). New York: Plenum Press. Han, S., Yund, E. W., Woods, D. L. (2003). An ERP study of the global precedence effect: The role of spatial frequency. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114(10), 1850–1865. Happe, F. G. (1996). Studying weak central coherence at low levels: Children with autism do not succumb to visual illusions. A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(7), 873–877. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(6), 223– 233. Hellige, J. B. (1993). Hemispheric asymmetry: What’s right and what’s left. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Jackson, B. L., Blackwood, E. M., Blum, J., Car- ruthers, S. P., Nemorin, S., Pryor, B. A., . . . Crewther, D. P. (2013). Magno- and parvocellular contrast responses in varying degrees of autistic trait. PLoS One, 8(6), e66797, doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0066797. Jemel, B., Mimeault, D., Saint-Amour, D., Hosein, A., Mottron, L. (2010). VEP contrast sensitivity responses reveal reduced functional segregation of mid and high filters of visual channels in autism. Journal of Vision, 10(6):13, 1–13, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/10/6/13, doi:10.1167/ 10.6.13. [PubMed] [Article] Jemel, B., Mottron, L., Dawson, M. (2006). Impaired face processing in autism: Fact or artifact? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 91–106, doi:10.1007/ s10803-005-0050-5. Jolliffe, T., Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Are people with autism and Asperger syndrome faster than normal on the Embedded Figures Test? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 527–534. Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2(3), 217–250. Kemner, C., van Engeland, H. (2006). ERPs and eye movements reflect atypical visual perception in pervasive developmental disorder. Journal of Au- tism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 45–54. Klintwall, L., Holm, A., Eriksson, M., Carlsson, L. H., Olsson, M. B., Hedvall, A., . . . Fernell, E. (2011). Sensory abnormalities in autism. A brief report. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 795– 800, doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.10.021. Koh, H. C., Milne, E., Dobkins, K. (2010a). Contrast sensitivity for motion detection and direction discrimination in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders and their siblings. Neuropsy- chologia, 48(14), 4046–4056, doi:10.1016/j. neuropsychologia.2010.10.008. Koh, H. C., Milne, E., Dobkins, K. (2010b). Spatial contrast sensitivity in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Devel- opmental Disorders, 40(8), 978–987, doi:10.1007/ s10803-010-0953-7. LaGasse, L. L. (1993). Effects of good form and spatial frequency on global precedence. Perception and Psychophysics, 53(1), 89–105. Lazarev, V. V., Pontes, A., deAzevedo, L. C. (2009). EEG photic driving: Right-hemisphere reactivity deficit in childhood autism. A pilot study. Interna- Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, Norcia 10
  • 11. tional Journal of Psychophysiology, 71(2), 177–183, doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.08.008. Leekam, S. R., Nieto, C., Libby, S. J., Wing, L., Gould, J. (2007). Describing the sensory abnor- malities of children and adults with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(5), 894– 910, doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0218-7. Lord, C., Rutter, M., Goode, S., Heemsbergen, J., Jordan, H., Mawhood, L., Schopler, E. (1989). Autism diagnostic observation schedule: A stan- dardized observation of communicative and social behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 19(2), 185–212. Marco, E. J., Hinkley, L. B., Hill, S. S., Nagarajan, S. S. (2011). Sensory processing in autism: A review of neurophysiologic findings. Pediatric Research, 69(5 Pt. 2), 48R–54R, doi:10.1203/PDR. 0b013e3182130c54. McCleery, J. P., Allman, E., Carver, L. J., Dobkins, K. R. (2007). Abnormal magnocellular pathway visual processing in infants at risk for autism. Biological Psychiatry, 62(9), 1007–1014, doi:10. 1016/j.biopsych.2007.02.009. Milne, E., Scope, A., Pascalis, O., Buckley, D., Makeig, S. (2009). Independent component analy- sis reveals atypical electroencephalographic activity during visual perception in individuals with autism. Biological Psychiatry, 65(1), 22–30, doi:10.1016/j. biopsych.2008.07.017. Milne, E., Swettenham, J., Hansen, P., Campbell, R., Jeffries, H., Plaisted, K. (2002). High motion coherence thresholds in children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(2), 255–263. Milne, E., White, S., Campbell, R., Swettenham, J., Hansen, P., Ramus, F. (2006). Motion and form coherence detection in autistic spectrum disorder: Relationship to motor control and 2:4 digit ratio. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(2), 225–237, doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0052-3. Mottron, L., Belleville, S. (1993). A study of perceptual analysis in a high-level autistic subject with exceptional graphic abilities. Brain and Cog- nition, 23(2), 279–309, doi:10.1006/brcg.1993.1060. Mottron, L., Dawson, M., Souli`eres, I., Hubert, B., Burack, J. (2006). Enhanced perceptual functioning in autism: an update, and eight principles of autistic perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 27–43. Newsome, W. T., Pare, E. B. (1988). A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). Journal of Neuroscience, 8(6), 2201–2211. Norcia, A. M., Clarke, M., Tyler, C. W. (1985). Digital filtering and robust regression techniques for estimating sensory thresholds from the evoked potential. IEEE Engineering and Medicine in Biology, 4, 26–32. Norcia, A. M., Manny, R.E. (2003). Development of vision in infants. In P. L. Kaufman A. Alm (Eds.), Adler’s physiology of the eye (10th ed., pp. 531–551). St. Louis, MO: Mosby. Norcia, A. M., Tyler, C. W. (1985). Spatial frequency sweep VEP: Visual acuity during the first year of life. Vision Research, 25(10), 1399–1408. Orekhova, E. V., Stroganova, T. A., Prokofiev, A. O., Nygren, G., Gillberg, C., Elam, M. (2009). The right hemisphere fails to respond to temporal novelty in autism: Evidence from an ERP study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(3), 520–529, doi:10. 1016/j.clinph.2008.12.034. Orekhova, E. V., Tsetlin, M. M., Butorina, A. V., Novikova, S. I., Gratchev, V. V., Sokolov, P. A., . . . Stroganova, T. A. (2012). Auditory cortex responses to clicks and sensory modulation diffi- culties in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). PLoS One, 7(6), e39906, doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0039906. O’Riordan, M., Passetti, F. (2006). Discrimination in autism within different sensory modalities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(5), 665– 675, doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0106-1. O’Riordan, M. A., Plaisted, K. C., Driver, J., Baron- Cohen, S. (2001). Superior visual search in autism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Per- ception and Performance, 27(3), 719–730. Owsley, C., Sloane, M. E. (1987). Contrast sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of ‘real- world’ targets. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(10), 791–796. Parry, N. R., Murray, I. J., Hadjizenonos, C. (1999). Spatio-temporal tuning of VEPs: Effect of mode of stimulation. Vision Research, 39(21), 3491–3497. Pei, F., Baldassi, S., Procida, G., Igliozzi, R., Tancredi, R., Muratori, F., Cioni, G. (2009). Neural correlates of texture and contour integration in children with autism spectrum disorders. Vision Research, 49(16), 2140–2150, doi:10.1016/j.visres. 2009.06.006. Pellicano, E., Gibson, L., Maybery, M., Durkin, K., Badcock, D. R. (2005). Abnormal global process- ing along the dorsal visual pathway in autism: A possible mechanism for weak visuospatial coher- ence? Neuropsychologia, 43(7), 1044–1053, doi:10. 1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.10.003. Plaisted, K., Dobler, V., Bell, S., Davis, G. (2006). Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, Norcia 11
  • 12. The microgenesis of global perception in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 107–116, doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0047-0. Plaisted, K., O’Riordan, M., Baron-Cohen, S. (1998). Enhanced visual search for a conjunctive target in autism: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(5), 777–783. Plaisted, K., Swettenham, J., Rees, L. (1999). Children with autism show local precedence in a divided attention task and global precedence in a selective attention task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(5), 733–742. Regan, D. (1989). Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. New York: Elsevier. Ruiz-Soler, M., Beltran, F. S. (2006). Face percep- tion: An integrative review of the role of spatial frequencies. Psychological Research, 70(4), 273– 292, doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0215-z. Shah, A., Frith, U. (1983). An islet of ability in autistic children: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24(4), 613–620. Skoczenski, A. M., Norcia, A. M. (1999). Develop- ment of VEP Vernier acuity and grating acuity in human infants. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 40(10), 2411–2417, http://www.iovs. org/content/40/10/2411. [PubMed] [Article] Spencer, J., O’Brien, J., Riggs, K., Braddick, O., Atkinson, J., Wattam-Bell, J. (2000). Motion processing in autism: Evidence for a dorsal stream deficiency. Neuroreport, 11(12), 2765–2767. Strasburger, H., Murray, I. J., Remky, A. (1993). Sustained and transient mechanisms in the steady- state visual-evoked potential—Onset presentation compared to pattern reversal. Clinical Vision Sciences, 8(3), 211–234. Stroganova, T. A., Nygren, G., Tsetlin, M. M., Posikera, I. N., Gillberg, C., Elam, M., Orekhova, E. V. (2007). Abnormal EEG laterali- zation in boys with autism. Clinical Neurophysiol- ogy, 118(8), 1842–1854, doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007. 05.005. Sutherland, A., Crewther, D. P. (2010). Magnocel- lular visual evoked potential delay with high autism spectrum quotient yields a neural mechanism for altered perception. Brain, 133(Pt. 7), 2089–2097, doi:10.1093/brain/awq122. Tavassoli, T., Latham, K., Bach, M., Dakin, S. C., Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). Psychophysical measures of visual acuity in autism spectrum conditions. Vision Research, 51(15), 1778–1780, doi:10.1016/j. visres.2011.06.004. Vandenbroucke, M. W., Scholte, H. S., van Engeland, H., Lamme, V. A., Kemner, C. (2008). A neural substrate for atypical low-level visual processing in autism spectrum disorder. Brain, 131(Pt. 4), 1013– 1024, doi:10.1093/brain/awm321. Venter, A., Lord, C., Schopler, E. (1992). A follow- up study of high-functioning autistic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33(3), 489–507. Williams, D. W., Sekuler, R. (1984). Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions. Vision Research, 24(1), 55–62. Wing, L. (1969). Handicaps of autistic children—A comparative study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 10(1), 1–40, doi: 10.1111/J.1469-7610.1969.Tb02066.X. Journal of Vision (2014) 14(11):3, 1–12 Pei, Baldassi, Norcia 12