SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 33
Term 2Week 4
Synonymy Antonymy Hyponymy Prototypes
Homophones
and
Homonyms
Polysemy Metonymy Collocation
 Two or more words with very closely related
meanings are called synonyms.
 Synonyms can often, though not always, be
substituted for each other in sentences.
 In appropriate circumstances, we can say What was
his answer? or What was his reply? With much the
same meaning.
 The idea of ‘sameness’ of meaning used in
discussing synonymy is not necessarily ‘total
sameness’. There are many occasions when one
word is appropriate in a sentence, but its synonym
would be odd.
 For example, reply would be odd in this instance.
 Sandy had only one answer correct on the test
 Sandy had only one reply correct on the test.
 Synonymous forms may also differ in terms of
formal versus informal uses.
 For example, the second version, with four
synonymous replacements, sounds much more
casual or informal than the first.
 My father purchased a large automobile.
 My dad bought a big car.
 Two forms with opposite meanings are called
antonyms.
 Some common examples are the pairs: alive / dead,
big / small, fat / slow, happy / sad, hot / cold, long /
short, male / female, married / single, old / new, rich /
poor, true / false
 Antonyms are usually divided into two main types:
 gradable – opposites along a scale
 non-gradable – direct opposites
 Gradable antonyms, such as big / small, can be used
in comparative constructions like I’m bigger than you
and A pony is smaller than a horse.
 The negative of one member of a gradable pair does
not necessarily imply the other. For example, the
sentence My car isn’t old does not necessarily mean
My car is new.
 With non-gradable antonyms (also called
‘complementary pairs’) , comparative constructions
are not normally used. We don’t typically describe
someone as deader or more dead than another.
 The negative of one member of a non-gradable pair
does imply the other member. That is, My
grandparents aren’t alive does indeed mean My
grandparents are dead.
 Although we can use the ‘negative test’ to identify
non-gradable antonyms in a language, we usually
avoid describing one member of an antonymous
pair as the negative of the other.
 For example, while undress can be treated as the
opposite of dress, it does not mean ‘not dress’. It
actually means ‘do the reverse of dress’. Antonyms
of this type are called reversives.
 Other common examples of reversives are: enter /
exit, pack / unpack, lengthen / shorten, raise / lower,
tie / untie
 When the meaning of one form is included in the
meaning of another, the relationship is described as
hyponymy.
 Examples are the pairs: animal / dog, dog / poodle,
vegetable / carrot, flower / rose, tree / banyan.
 The concept of ‘inclusion’ involved in this
relationship is the idea that if an object is a rose,
then it is necessarily a flower, so the meaning of
flower is included in the meaning of rose. Or rose is a
hyponym of flower.
 When we consider hyponymous connections, we
are essentially looking at the meaning of words in
some type of hierarchical relationship.
 We can represent the relationships between a set of
words as a hierarchical diagram.
 The concept of a prototype helps explain the
meaning of certain words like bird, not in terms of
component features (e.g. ‘has feathers’, ‘has
wings’), but in terms of resemblance to the clearest
example.
 While words like canary, cormorant, dove, duck,
flamingo, parrot, pelican and robin are all equally co-
hyponyms of the super-ordinate bird, they are not
all considered to be equally good examples of the
category ‘bird’.
 According to some researchers, the most
characteristic instance of the category ‘bird’ is robin.
 Thus, even native speakers of English might wonder
if ostrich or penguin should be hyponyms of bird
(technically they are), but have no trouble deciding
about sparrow or pigeon. These last two are much
closer to the prototype.
 When two or more different (written) forms have
the same pronunciation, they are described as
homophones.
 Common examples are bare / bear, meat / meet, flour
/ flower, pail / pale, right / write, sew / so and to / too /
two.
 We use the term homonyms when one form
(written or spoken) has two or more unrelated
meanings, as in these examples:
bank ( of a river) – bank (financial institution)
Bat (flying creature) – bat (used in sports)
mole (on skin) – mole (small animal)
pupil (at school) – pupil (in the eye)
race (contest of speed) – race (ethnic group)
bank ( of a river) – bank (financial institution)
 The temptation is to think that the two types of
bank must be related in meaning.They are not.
 Homonyms are words that have separate histories
and meanings, but have accidentally come to have
exactly the same form.
 When we encounter two or more words with the
same form and related meanings, we have what is
technically known as polysemy.
 Polysemy can be defined as one form (written or
spoken) having multiple meanings that are all
related by extension.
 Examples are the word head, used to refer to the
object on top of your body, on top of a glass of beer,
person at the top of a company or department and
many other things.
 Other examples of polysemy are foot (of person, of
bed, of mountain) or run (person does, water does,
colours do).
 If we are not sure whether different uses of a single
word are examples of homonymy or polysemy, we
can check in a dictionary.
 If the word has multiple meanings (i.e. it is
polysemous), then there will be a single entry, with
a numbered list of the different meanings of the
word.
 If the two words are treated as homonyms, they will
typically have two separate entries.
 It is possible for two forms to be distinguished via
homonymy and for one of the forms also to have
uses via polysemy.
 The words date (= a thing we eat) and date (= a point
in time) are homonyms.
 Date (= a point in time) is polysemous in terms of a
particular day and month (= on a letter), an
arranged meeting time (= an appointment), a social
meeting (= with someone we like), and even a
person (= that person we like).
 A type of relationship based on a close connection
in everyday experience, which can be based on:
 container-contents relation (bottle / water, can /
juice)
 whole-part relation (car / wheels, house / roof)
 representative-symbol relationship (king / crown,
the President /White House)
 Using one of these words to refer to the other is an
example of metonymy.
 It is our familiarity with metonymy that makes it
possible for us to understand He drank the whole
bottle although it sounds absurd literally (i.e. he
drank the liquid, not the glass object).
 We also accept The White House has announced… or
Downing Street protested… without being puzzled
that buildings appear to be talking.
 Many examples of metonymy are highly
conventionalized and easy to interpret. However,
other examples depend on an ability to infer what
the speaker has in mind. Examples include:
Get your butt over here.
The strings are too quiet.
I prefer cable.
 Making sense of such expressions often depends on
context, background knowledge and inference.
 We know that some words tend to occur with other
words. If you ask a thousand people what they think
of when you say hammer, more than half will say
nail. If you say table, they will mostly say chair, and
butter elicits bread, needle elicits thread and salt
elicits pepper.
 One way we seem to organize our knowledge of
words is simply on the basis of collocation, or
frequently occurring together.
How can we apply our understanding of semantic
features, semantic roles and lexical relations in
discourse analysis?

More Related Content

What's hot

Pragmatics presentation
Pragmatics presentationPragmatics presentation
Pragmatics presentation
Mehwish Nazar
 
Language, culture and thought
Language, culture and thoughtLanguage, culture and thought
Language, culture and thought
zhian fadhil
 
Lexical Relations By Nasir
Lexical Relations By NasirLexical Relations By Nasir
Lexical Relations By Nasir
Dr. Cupid Lucid
 
Introduction to psycholinguistics
Introduction to psycholinguisticsIntroduction to psycholinguistics
Introduction to psycholinguistics
Lusya Liann
 
Sense relations & Semantics
Sense relations & SemanticsSense relations & Semantics
Sense relations & Semantics
Afuza Shara
 

What's hot (20)

Semantics
SemanticsSemantics
Semantics
 
Semantic roles and semantic features
Semantic roles and semantic featuresSemantic roles and semantic features
Semantic roles and semantic features
 
Mentalist and Behaviorist Theory of SLA
Mentalist and Behaviorist Theory of SLAMentalist and Behaviorist Theory of SLA
Mentalist and Behaviorist Theory of SLA
 
Ambiguity
AmbiguityAmbiguity
Ambiguity
 
Semantic roles
Semantic rolesSemantic roles
Semantic roles
 
Pragmatics presentation
Pragmatics presentationPragmatics presentation
Pragmatics presentation
 
Language, culture and thought
Language, culture and thoughtLanguage, culture and thought
Language, culture and thought
 
Semantics
SemanticsSemantics
Semantics
 
Lexical Relations By Nasir
Lexical Relations By NasirLexical Relations By Nasir
Lexical Relations By Nasir
 
Introduction to psycholinguistics
Introduction to psycholinguisticsIntroduction to psycholinguistics
Introduction to psycholinguistics
 
Speech act theory
Speech act theorySpeech act theory
Speech act theory
 
Sense relations & Semantics
Sense relations & SemanticsSense relations & Semantics
Sense relations & Semantics
 
SEMANTICS
SEMANTICS SEMANTICS
SEMANTICS
 
Componential-Analysis.pptx
Componential-Analysis.pptxComponential-Analysis.pptx
Componential-Analysis.pptx
 
Pragmatics
PragmaticsPragmatics
Pragmatics
 
Schools of thought
Schools of thoughtSchools of thought
Schools of thought
 
Introduction to sosiolinguistics
Introduction to sosiolinguisticsIntroduction to sosiolinguistics
Introduction to sosiolinguistics
 
Code Switching, Types and Reasons
Code Switching, Types and ReasonsCode Switching, Types and Reasons
Code Switching, Types and Reasons
 
Pragmatics: Introduction
Pragmatics: IntroductionPragmatics: Introduction
Pragmatics: Introduction
 
Pidgin & creoles
Pidgin & creolesPidgin & creoles
Pidgin & creoles
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Lexical Relations in Semantic
Lexical Relations in SemanticLexical Relations in Semantic
Lexical Relations in Semantic
 
Stages of child language development
Stages of child language developmentStages of child language development
Stages of child language development
 
Pragmatics: Deixis And Distance By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
Pragmatics:  Deixis And Distance By Dr.Shadia.PptxPragmatics:  Deixis And Distance By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
Pragmatics: Deixis And Distance By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
 
Phrase and sentence meaning
Phrase and sentence meaningPhrase and sentence meaning
Phrase and sentence meaning
 
Deixis presentation
Deixis presentationDeixis presentation
Deixis presentation
 
Structural Semantics
Structural SemanticsStructural Semantics
Structural Semantics
 
Pragmatics
PragmaticsPragmatics
Pragmatics
 
Processes of word formation
Processes of word formationProcesses of word formation
Processes of word formation
 

Similar to Lexical relations

SEMANTIC = LEXICAL RELATIONS
SEMANTIC = LEXICAL RELATIONS SEMANTIC = LEXICAL RELATIONS
SEMANTIC = LEXICAL RELATIONS
Ani Istiana
 
Adjectives and adverbs
Adjectives and adverbsAdjectives and adverbs
Adjectives and adverbs
BEbby Yuyu
 

Similar to Lexical relations (20)

ELE 14 - SEMANTICS LEXICAL RELATIONS.pdf
ELE 14 - SEMANTICS  LEXICAL RELATIONS.pdfELE 14 - SEMANTICS  LEXICAL RELATIONS.pdf
ELE 14 - SEMANTICS LEXICAL RELATIONS.pdf
 
Ppt upload
Ppt uploadPpt upload
Ppt upload
 
Lecture 22
Lecture 22Lecture 22
Lecture 22
 
Word Meaning
Word MeaningWord Meaning
Word Meaning
 
THE DIMENSIONS OF MEANING.pptx
THE DIMENSIONS OF MEANING.pptxTHE DIMENSIONS OF MEANING.pptx
THE DIMENSIONS OF MEANING.pptx
 
Semantic relation among words
Semantic relation among wordsSemantic relation among words
Semantic relation among words
 
SEMANTIC = LEXICAL RELATIONS
SEMANTIC = LEXICAL RELATIONS SEMANTIC = LEXICAL RELATIONS
SEMANTIC = LEXICAL RELATIONS
 
Linguistic in short
Linguistic in shortLinguistic in short
Linguistic in short
 
Semantics 2
Semantics 2Semantics 2
Semantics 2
 
Semantics
SemanticsSemantics
Semantics
 
Sense relations (linguistics)
Sense relations (linguistics)Sense relations (linguistics)
Sense relations (linguistics)
 
Adjectives and adverbs
Adjectives and adverbsAdjectives and adverbs
Adjectives and adverbs
 
Morphology
MorphologyMorphology
Morphology
 
Word formation (communication skill)
Word formation (communication skill)Word formation (communication skill)
Word formation (communication skill)
 
semantic relations2017.pptx
semantic relations2017.pptxsemantic relations2017.pptx
semantic relations2017.pptx
 
Week 4.2 semantic relationship student copy
Week 4.2 semantic relationship student copyWeek 4.2 semantic relationship student copy
Week 4.2 semantic relationship student copy
 
Vocabulary
VocabularyVocabulary
Vocabulary
 
cours 1intro to lexico-semantics+ lexical relations .pptx
cours 1intro to lexico-semantics+ lexical relations .pptxcours 1intro to lexico-semantics+ lexical relations .pptx
cours 1intro to lexico-semantics+ lexical relations .pptx
 
semantics.pptx
semantics.pptxsemantics.pptx
semantics.pptx
 
Morphological processes
Morphological processesMorphological processes
Morphological processes
 

More from Hina Honey

Critical discourse analysis
Critical discourse analysisCritical discourse analysis
Critical discourse analysis
Hina Honey
 
Mikhail mikhailovich bakhtin, lecture outline
Mikhail mikhailovich bakhtin, lecture outlineMikhail mikhailovich bakhtin, lecture outline
Mikhail mikhailovich bakhtin, lecture outline
Hina Honey
 
Technical report writing
Technical report writingTechnical report writing
Technical report writing
Hina Honey
 
48652380 functional-english
48652380 functional-english48652380 functional-english
48652380 functional-english
Hina Honey
 
Business communication & principles
Business communication & principlesBusiness communication & principles
Business communication & principles
Hina Honey
 
32604885 functional-english-for-entrepreneurs
32604885 functional-english-for-entrepreneurs32604885 functional-english-for-entrepreneurs
32604885 functional-english-for-entrepreneurs
Hina Honey
 
61739515 functional-english-grammar
61739515 functional-english-grammar61739515 functional-english-grammar
61739515 functional-english-grammar
Hina Honey
 
Honey's presentaion
Honey's presentaionHoney's presentaion
Honey's presentaion
Hina Honey
 
Phonetics full
Phonetics fullPhonetics full
Phonetics full
Hina Honey
 
51285452 seven-types-of-meaning
51285452 seven-types-of-meaning51285452 seven-types-of-meaning
51285452 seven-types-of-meaning
Hina Honey
 
Speaking skills presentation by hina 2
Speaking skills presentation by hina 2Speaking skills presentation by hina 2
Speaking skills presentation by hina 2
Hina Honey
 
vocabulary for Essay writing
vocabulary for Essay writingvocabulary for Essay writing
vocabulary for Essay writing
Hina Honey
 

More from Hina Honey (20)

6 suprasegmental phonology pp186-238
6 suprasegmental phonology pp186-2386 suprasegmental phonology pp186-238
6 suprasegmental phonology pp186-238
 
linguistics glossary and terminology
linguistics glossary and terminologylinguistics glossary and terminology
linguistics glossary and terminology
 
Discourse analysis-by-gillian-brown-george-yule
Discourse analysis-by-gillian-brown-george-yuleDiscourse analysis-by-gillian-brown-george-yule
Discourse analysis-by-gillian-brown-george-yule
 
Critical discourse analysis
Critical discourse analysisCritical discourse analysis
Critical discourse analysis
 
Applying simclair coulthard model
Applying simclair coulthard modelApplying simclair coulthard model
Applying simclair coulthard model
 
Phonology by vikner
Phonology by viknerPhonology by vikner
Phonology by vikner
 
Kirchner on phonology
Kirchner on phonologyKirchner on phonology
Kirchner on phonology
 
Mikhail mikhailovich bakhtin, lecture outline
Mikhail mikhailovich bakhtin, lecture outlineMikhail mikhailovich bakhtin, lecture outline
Mikhail mikhailovich bakhtin, lecture outline
 
Technical report writing
Technical report writingTechnical report writing
Technical report writing
 
Bullah shah
Bullah shahBullah shah
Bullah shah
 
Essaywriting
EssaywritingEssaywriting
Essaywriting
 
48652380 functional-english
48652380 functional-english48652380 functional-english
48652380 functional-english
 
Business communication & principles
Business communication & principlesBusiness communication & principles
Business communication & principles
 
32604885 functional-english-for-entrepreneurs
32604885 functional-english-for-entrepreneurs32604885 functional-english-for-entrepreneurs
32604885 functional-english-for-entrepreneurs
 
61739515 functional-english-grammar
61739515 functional-english-grammar61739515 functional-english-grammar
61739515 functional-english-grammar
 
Honey's presentaion
Honey's presentaionHoney's presentaion
Honey's presentaion
 
Phonetics full
Phonetics fullPhonetics full
Phonetics full
 
51285452 seven-types-of-meaning
51285452 seven-types-of-meaning51285452 seven-types-of-meaning
51285452 seven-types-of-meaning
 
Speaking skills presentation by hina 2
Speaking skills presentation by hina 2Speaking skills presentation by hina 2
Speaking skills presentation by hina 2
 
vocabulary for Essay writing
vocabulary for Essay writingvocabulary for Essay writing
vocabulary for Essay writing
 

Recently uploaded

IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI SolutionsIAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
Enterprise Knowledge
 
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and MythsArtificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Joaquim Jorge
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptx
Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptxFactors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptx
Factors to Consider When Choosing Accounts Payable Services Providers.pptx
 
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
 
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time AutomationFrom Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
From Event to Action: Accelerate Your Decision Making with Real-Time Automation
 
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path MountBreaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
Breaking the Kubernetes Kill Chain: Host Path Mount
 
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
 
Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...
Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...
Driving Behavioral Change for Information Management through Data-Driven Gree...
 
What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?
What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?
What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?
 
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
 
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI SolutionsIAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
IAC 2024 - IA Fast Track to Search Focused AI Solutions
 
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
The 7 Things I Know About Cyber Security After 25 Years | April 2024
 
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine  KG and Vector search for  enhanced R...
Workshop - Best of Both Worlds_ Combine KG and Vector search for enhanced R...
 
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law DevelopmentsTrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
 
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfBoost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
 
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
Raspberry Pi 5: Challenges and Solutions in Bringing up an OpenGL/Vulkan Driv...
 
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and MythsArtificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
 

Lexical relations

  • 4.  Two or more words with very closely related meanings are called synonyms.
  • 5.  Synonyms can often, though not always, be substituted for each other in sentences.  In appropriate circumstances, we can say What was his answer? or What was his reply? With much the same meaning.
  • 6.  The idea of ‘sameness’ of meaning used in discussing synonymy is not necessarily ‘total sameness’. There are many occasions when one word is appropriate in a sentence, but its synonym would be odd.  For example, reply would be odd in this instance.  Sandy had only one answer correct on the test  Sandy had only one reply correct on the test.
  • 7.  Synonymous forms may also differ in terms of formal versus informal uses.  For example, the second version, with four synonymous replacements, sounds much more casual or informal than the first.  My father purchased a large automobile.  My dad bought a big car.
  • 8.  Two forms with opposite meanings are called antonyms.  Some common examples are the pairs: alive / dead, big / small, fat / slow, happy / sad, hot / cold, long / short, male / female, married / single, old / new, rich / poor, true / false
  • 9.  Antonyms are usually divided into two main types:  gradable – opposites along a scale  non-gradable – direct opposites
  • 10.  Gradable antonyms, such as big / small, can be used in comparative constructions like I’m bigger than you and A pony is smaller than a horse.  The negative of one member of a gradable pair does not necessarily imply the other. For example, the sentence My car isn’t old does not necessarily mean My car is new.
  • 11.  With non-gradable antonyms (also called ‘complementary pairs’) , comparative constructions are not normally used. We don’t typically describe someone as deader or more dead than another.  The negative of one member of a non-gradable pair does imply the other member. That is, My grandparents aren’t alive does indeed mean My grandparents are dead.
  • 12.  Although we can use the ‘negative test’ to identify non-gradable antonyms in a language, we usually avoid describing one member of an antonymous pair as the negative of the other.  For example, while undress can be treated as the opposite of dress, it does not mean ‘not dress’. It actually means ‘do the reverse of dress’. Antonyms of this type are called reversives.
  • 13.  Other common examples of reversives are: enter / exit, pack / unpack, lengthen / shorten, raise / lower, tie / untie
  • 14.  When the meaning of one form is included in the meaning of another, the relationship is described as hyponymy.  Examples are the pairs: animal / dog, dog / poodle, vegetable / carrot, flower / rose, tree / banyan.
  • 15.  The concept of ‘inclusion’ involved in this relationship is the idea that if an object is a rose, then it is necessarily a flower, so the meaning of flower is included in the meaning of rose. Or rose is a hyponym of flower.
  • 16.  When we consider hyponymous connections, we are essentially looking at the meaning of words in some type of hierarchical relationship.  We can represent the relationships between a set of words as a hierarchical diagram.
  • 17.  The concept of a prototype helps explain the meaning of certain words like bird, not in terms of component features (e.g. ‘has feathers’, ‘has wings’), but in terms of resemblance to the clearest example.
  • 18.  While words like canary, cormorant, dove, duck, flamingo, parrot, pelican and robin are all equally co- hyponyms of the super-ordinate bird, they are not all considered to be equally good examples of the category ‘bird’.  According to some researchers, the most characteristic instance of the category ‘bird’ is robin.
  • 19.  Thus, even native speakers of English might wonder if ostrich or penguin should be hyponyms of bird (technically they are), but have no trouble deciding about sparrow or pigeon. These last two are much closer to the prototype.
  • 20.  When two or more different (written) forms have the same pronunciation, they are described as homophones.  Common examples are bare / bear, meat / meet, flour / flower, pail / pale, right / write, sew / so and to / too / two.
  • 21.  We use the term homonyms when one form (written or spoken) has two or more unrelated meanings, as in these examples: bank ( of a river) – bank (financial institution) Bat (flying creature) – bat (used in sports) mole (on skin) – mole (small animal) pupil (at school) – pupil (in the eye) race (contest of speed) – race (ethnic group)
  • 22. bank ( of a river) – bank (financial institution)  The temptation is to think that the two types of bank must be related in meaning.They are not.  Homonyms are words that have separate histories and meanings, but have accidentally come to have exactly the same form.
  • 23.  When we encounter two or more words with the same form and related meanings, we have what is technically known as polysemy.  Polysemy can be defined as one form (written or spoken) having multiple meanings that are all related by extension.
  • 24.  Examples are the word head, used to refer to the object on top of your body, on top of a glass of beer, person at the top of a company or department and many other things.  Other examples of polysemy are foot (of person, of bed, of mountain) or run (person does, water does, colours do).
  • 25.  If we are not sure whether different uses of a single word are examples of homonymy or polysemy, we can check in a dictionary.
  • 26.  If the word has multiple meanings (i.e. it is polysemous), then there will be a single entry, with a numbered list of the different meanings of the word.  If the two words are treated as homonyms, they will typically have two separate entries.
  • 27.  It is possible for two forms to be distinguished via homonymy and for one of the forms also to have uses via polysemy.
  • 28.  The words date (= a thing we eat) and date (= a point in time) are homonyms.  Date (= a point in time) is polysemous in terms of a particular day and month (= on a letter), an arranged meeting time (= an appointment), a social meeting (= with someone we like), and even a person (= that person we like).
  • 29.  A type of relationship based on a close connection in everyday experience, which can be based on:  container-contents relation (bottle / water, can / juice)  whole-part relation (car / wheels, house / roof)  representative-symbol relationship (king / crown, the President /White House)  Using one of these words to refer to the other is an example of metonymy.
  • 30.  It is our familiarity with metonymy that makes it possible for us to understand He drank the whole bottle although it sounds absurd literally (i.e. he drank the liquid, not the glass object).  We also accept The White House has announced… or Downing Street protested… without being puzzled that buildings appear to be talking.
  • 31.  Many examples of metonymy are highly conventionalized and easy to interpret. However, other examples depend on an ability to infer what the speaker has in mind. Examples include: Get your butt over here. The strings are too quiet. I prefer cable.  Making sense of such expressions often depends on context, background knowledge and inference.
  • 32.  We know that some words tend to occur with other words. If you ask a thousand people what they think of when you say hammer, more than half will say nail. If you say table, they will mostly say chair, and butter elicits bread, needle elicits thread and salt elicits pepper.  One way we seem to organize our knowledge of words is simply on the basis of collocation, or frequently occurring together.
  • 33. How can we apply our understanding of semantic features, semantic roles and lexical relations in discourse analysis?