SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 25
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Smart
Systems
Manifesto
road map
for the
internet of things
white
paper
Harbor
Research
How networked computing and
the physical world are merging
to transform civilization
2
smart systems manifesto white paper
T
HE BIT, THE BYTE, AND LATER THE
PACKET MADE POSSIBLE THE ENTIRE
ENTERPRISE OF DIGITAL COMPUTING
AND GLOBAL NETWORKING. UNTIL
THE WORLD AGREED UPON THESE
BASIC CONCEPTS, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO MOVE
FORWARD. THE NEXT GREAT STEP IN INFORMATION
AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES—
COMPLETELY FLUID INFORMATION AND FULLY
INTEROPERATING MACHINES AND DEVICES—
REQUIRES AN EQUALLY SIMPLE, FLEXIBLE, AND
UNIVERSAL ABSTRACTION SCHEMA THAT WILL
MAKE INFORMATION ITSELF TRULY PORTABLE IN
BOTH PHYSICAL AND VIRTUAL SPACE, AND AMONG
ANY CONCEIVABLE INFORMATION DEVICES AND
SYSTEMS. FOR THE INTERNET OF THINGS TO
REALLY TAKE OFF, RADICAL NEW THINKING ABOUT
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MUST BEGIN AT THE
MOST BASIC LEVELS, WITH NEW CONCEPTIONS
ABOUT HOW DEVICES, INFORMATION,
PEOPLE AND SYSTEMS WILL INTERACT.
3
smart systems manifesto white paper
TABLE OF CONTENTS
4	Introduction
7	 Designing The Future of Information
9	 What’s Required?
11	 Enabling Universal Connectivity
12	 Automating Design and Development
15	 Achieving Truly Flexible, Scalable Systems
17	 Leveraging Collective Intelligence
19	 Smart Systems Impact On Evolving Business Models
21	 How Should We View Future Smart Systems Architecture?
23	 Smart Systems Is A Radical Departure From Current Thinking
24	 Getting There First; But To Where?
THE SMART
SYSTEMS
MANIFESTO
4
smart systems manifesto white paper
For quite a few years now, Harbor Research
has focused most of its research and consult-
ing on what we call “Smart Systems”—the
convergence of pervasive or embedded
computing with the packet-switching
“network of networks” called the Internet.
These days, many people refer to this phe-
nomenon as “the Internet of Things.” We
prefer “Smart Systems” over other terms in
common use—notably “M2M,” which usu-
ally stands for “machine-to-machine”—be-
cause it captures the profound enormity of
the phenomenon - something much greater
in scope than just machine connectivity.
Whatever we chose to call it -- “Smart
Systems” or “Pervasive Computing” or “The
Internet of Things” — we are referring to
digital microprocessors and sensors em-
bedded in everyday objects. But even this
makes too many assumptions about what
the smart systems phenomenon will be.
Encoded information in physical objects is
also smart—even without intrinsic comput-
ing ability. Seen in this way, a printed bar
code, a house key, or even the pages of a
technical manual can have the status of
an “information device” on a network. For
that matter, all of these characterizations
do not even begin to address the human-
machine dimension of collaboration.
But very few people are thinking about
smart connected systems on that level.
Current IT and telecom technologists are
operating with outdated models of data,
networking and information management
that were conceived in the mainframe
and client-server eras and cannot serve
the needs of a truly connected world.
“Smart Systems” should automatically be
understood as “real-time networked in-
formation and computation,” but it isn’t.
We have now entered the age when ev-
eryday objects will communicate with, and
control, other objects over a global data
network—24/7/365. It’s not “the future,” it’s
now—this year, next year—and thus it is vi-
tally important that business leaders under-
stand this phenomenon, its effects on their
business, and what they should do right
now to position themselves for opportuni-
ties that are literally just around the corner.
Before delving into the new thinking that
makes this story possible, let’s talk about
why it’s necessary at all. The IT and tele-
com sectors have failed to re-evaluate
their relationship to advancing technol-
INTRODUCTION
5
smart systems manifesto white paper
M2M & IT
technology only
tell part of the story
ogy and to their constituents. The busi-
ness and technology paradigms to which
these industries cling today are far too
limiting, too cumbersome and too expen-
sive to foster and sustain new growth.
From a Telco perspective, today’s discussions
of M2M systems focus almost exclusively
on communications -- the “pipe” -- and very
little on the information value. In other
words, on things that look good to the car-
riers. There are many popular visions about
wireless monitoring and wireless control.
Such as it is, wireless is a fantastic new ad-
vance -- no question. But, focusing on the
communication element alone as ‘first-or-
der’ business value amounts to grabbing the
wrong end of the technology stick. Wireless
communications alone steals the limelight
and potentially eclipses the real revolution
-- utilizing new networking technologies
and processes to liberate information from
sensors and intelligent devices to leverage
collective awareness and intelligence.
From an IT perspective, today’s corporate
IT function is a direct descendent of the
company mainframe, and works on the
same “batched computing” model—an
archival model, yielding a historian’s per-
spective. Information about events is
collected, stored, queried, analyzed, and
reported upon. But all after the fact.
That’s a very different thing from feed-
ing the real-time inputs of billions of tiny
“state machines” into systems that con-
tinually compare machine-state to sets
of rules and then do something on that
basis. In short, for connected devices to
mean anything in business, the prevail-
ing corporate IT model has to change.
The next cycle of technology and systems
development in the smart connected
systems arena is supposed to be setting
the stage for a multi-year wave of growth
based on the convergence of innovations
in software architectures; back-room data
center operations; wireless and broadband
communications; and smaller, more power-
ful client devices connected to personal,
local and wide-area networks. But is it?
6
smart systems manifesto white paper
This paper is about an important new
perspective on smart systems and services.
This perspective does not just come from
our own thinking. It is from the diverse
group of people who are thinking about the
scope and on the scale that Smart Systems
deserves. It is because this community of
technologists and business developers is
so fragmented that we believe a new ap-
proach is required. This is why we believe
a new “manifesto” is required to begin to
integrate and bind these disparate views
of the future of information technology.
What do we plan to address in this
Smart Systems Manifesto?
»» the required architecture and tech-
nologies to inform a radically new
view of information services; and,
»» the corresponding emerging business
models these technologies will inform.
Most importantly, we plan to demonstrate
that for the first time in the evolution of
networked businesses, these two “architec-
tures” must be viewed in close proximity.
The two thrusts need to be mutually sup-
portive without inhibiting one or the other.
However, trying to coordinate and leverage
the respective roles of technology architec-
ture and business architecture often creates
contention. Many of the participants in this
emerging arena we speak with are coming
to see the continuously evolving relation-
ship between these two dimensions as
fertile ground for innovation. They need to
be interwoven and mutually supportive. In
fact, from our own direct consulting experi-
ences, we believe success in either increas-
ingly goes to the company that effectively
utilizes the combined potential of both.
In our years of work on the Internet of Things
phenomenon and its real-world effects on
business, we have not encountered very
many compelling visions about the com-
plete integration of things, people, systems
and real-time real-world inputs. The world
today, for the most part, lacks a group of
coordinated innovators that understand that
the tools we are working with to make prod-
ucts “smart” on networks were not designed
to handle the scope and diversity of interac-
tions they are being enabled to accomplish.
WHY DO WE NEED
A MANIFESTO?
7
smart systems manifesto white paper
Since the beginning of computing there
have essentially been three generations of
technology and architecture: mainframe
computing, personal computing, and
network computing. Each generation of
technology has had significant impacts on
productivity and efficiencies: mainframes
standardized transactions; personal comput-
ing placed processing power into the hands
of professionals; and, networked systems
enabled business process automation.
What is important about the next gen-
eration of smart systems is the combined
impact of these legacy cycles of innovation.
While there is standalone value in each
discipline - embedded software, servers,
network infrastructure, and client devices
- it is the combination of these innova-
tions that will inform smarter systems.
“Smart Connected Systems” really means the
future of information, and that means the
future of civilization. It will require a remark-
ably agile global network that could com-
fortably scale to trillions of nodes—some of
them hardware, some software, some purely
data, many of them coming into and out of
existence or changing location constantly.
Obviously, such a network system cannot
be “designed” in any ordinary sense. Cer-
tainly, it cannot be designed “top-down.”
And yet the Internet of Things must be
designed in some sense. Such a net-
work will easily be the biggest technical
achievement in the history of human-
ity. Its closest predecessor is the global
financial economy—with which, in
fact, it will share vital characteristics.
Some basic design principles must be
put in place to guide the growth of a
vast, distributed technological organism
that must remain organized as it evolves
according to a logic all its own. It de-
mands that we design not only devices
and networks but also information itself
in ways not addressed by current IT.
The Internet of Interactions -- between
and among “Things” and “People” -- re-
quires much more than simple incremental
improvements in today’s technologies to
be fully realized. The challenge is much
more than a simple patch, Band-Aid, or
new flavor of what we already do.
can the internet of
things be designed?
Designing The Future of
Information
8
smart systems manifesto white paper
What’s required is a true shift in thinking
about how devices, people and physical
systems will be integrated and how they will
interact. We need an approach that is not
about leveraging aging IT technology into
a new application context; its about look-
ing forward to a single, unified architecture
for the nearly infinite interactions to which
any PERSON or any THING can contribute.
What will this require?
»» Its about the ability to create more
universal standards for connectivity
and integration; one simple standard,
based upon the Internet Protocol
itself for networking any information
device (even non-electronic ones),
rather than the multiplicity of so-
called standards we have today.
»» A vision that looks toward the creation
of more universal means to integrate
and manage disparate data, to which
anyone can contribute, and which
liberates information by abandoning
traditional relational databasing and the
client-server computing models that
have us so deceptively ”trapped” today.
simple incremental improvements in
today’s technologies will not work for
the internet of things
These broader requirements are
driving several important devel-
opment trends, including:
»» The rapidly rising requirements for
smart products to be interoper-
able with a growing array of ap-
plications, systems and people.
»» End customers are beginning to recog-
nize the requirement for a unified family
of software and tools to develop smart
connected devices; today’s diverse soft-
ware offerings and fragmented supplier
community will not meet their needs.
»» The need for new development pro-
tocols to address the growing com-
plexity of new devices and systems.
»» The ability to aggregate, fuse
and manage structured, unstruc-
tured and time series data.
»» The maturation of radically new in-
formation models and architectures
that can more readily integrate clas-
sical IT capabilities with real-time,
state-based devices and systems.
9
smart systems manifesto white paper
Taking these initiatives seriously does not
mean junking all current IT practice in one
fell swoop. The pillars of present-day infor-
mation technology will not crumble over-
night, nor has the great existing investment
in them suddenly lost all value. There are
reasonable, fiscally sane paths for migrat-
ing to the future. But migrate we must.
The assumptions and practices of the main-
frame and PC eras are now decades old and
not suitable for the pervasive computing
era that informs the internet of things and
people. The nature and behavior of a truly
distributed global information system are
concerns that have yet to really take center
stage—not only in business communities,
but in most technology communities, too.
When it comes to preparing for the global
information economy of the 21st century,
most people assume that “the IT and telco
technologists are taking care of it.” They
take it on faith that the best possible designs
for the future of connected things, people,
systems and information will emerge from
large corporations and centralized authori-
ties. But those are big, unfounded assump-
tions. In fact, most of today’s entrenched
players are showing little appetite for radical
departures from current practice. Yet cur-
rent practice will not serve the needs of a
genuinely connected world. What are the
major obstacles that need to be overcome?
Automated Development: When tele-
phones first came into existence, all calls were
routed through switchboards and had to be
connected by a live operator. It was long ago
forecast that if telephone traffic continued
to grow in this way, soon everybody in the
world would have to be a switchboard opera-
tor. Of course that has not happened, be-
cause automation was built into the systems
to handle common tasks like connecting
calls. We are quickly approaching analogous
circumstances with the proliferation of smart
connected devices. Each new device requires
too much customization and maintenance
just to perform the same basic tasks. We
must develop software and methods to
automate development and facilitate re-use,
or risk constraining the growth of this market.
the assumptions and practices of
the mainframe and PC eras are now
decades old and not suitable for the
pervasive and smart computing era
What’s Required?
10
smart systems manifesto white paper
Flexible, Scalable Systems: IT profession-
als rarely talk these days about the need
for ever-evolving information services that
can be made available anywhere, anytime,
for any kind of information. Instead, they
talk about web services, enterprise apps
and now cloud computing. The Web stores
information in one of two basic ways: utterly
unstructured, or far too rigidly structured.
The unstructured way gives us typical static
Web pages, blog postings, etc., in which the
basic unit of information is large, free-form,
and lacking any fundamental identity. The
overly structured way involves the use of
relational database tables that impose rigid,
pre-ordained schemas on stored informa-
tion. These schemas, designed by database
administrators in advance, are not at all
agile or easily extensible. Making even trivial
changes to these schemas is a cumbersome,
expensive process that affects all the data
inside them. Just as importantly, they make
deep, inflexible assumptions about the mean-
ing and context of the data they store. Both
of these approaches to data-structure enforce
severe limitations on the functions you want
most in a global, pervasive-era information
system: scalability, interoperability and seam-
less integration of real-time or event-driven
data. The client-server model underlying
the Web greatly compounds the problem.
Optimizing All Assets - Tangible And In-
tangible: New software technologies and
applications need to help organizations
address the key challenge of optimizing
the value of their balance sheets, allowing
them to move beyond just financial assets
and liabilities to their physical assets and
liabilities (like electric grids or hospitals)
and then to their intangible assets and li-
abilities (like a skilled workforce). The task
of optimizing the value of financial assets,
physical assets and people assets requires
new technologies that will integrate diverse
asset information in unprecedented ways
to solve more complex business problems.
Leveraging Collective Intelligence: For
all its sophistication, many of today’s M2M
systems are a direct descendent of the tradi-
tional cellular telephony model where each
device acts in a “hub and spoke” mode. The
inability of today’s popular enterprise systems
to interoperate and perform well with distrib-
uted heterogeneous device environments is
a significant obstacle. The many “nodes” of
a network may not be very “smart” in them-
selves, but if they are networked in a way
today’s M2M systems are a
descendent of the traditional
cellular telephony model
11
smart systems manifesto white paper
that allows them to connect effortlessly and
interoperate seamlessly, they begin to give
rise to complex, system-wide behavior. This
allows an entirely new order of intelligence to
emerge from the system as a whole—an in-
telligence that could not have been predicted
by looking at any of the nodes individually.
What’s required is to shift the focus from
simple device monitoring to a model where
device data is aggregated into new applica-
tions to achieve true systems intelligence.
Smart Systems holds the potential for
what Harbor Research calls “the network-
ing of every manufactured thing.” but it
also presupposes the existence of “a zero-
infrastructure, ad-hoc network” that makes
seamless physical connection possible.
How will the physical aspects of this net-
working actually take place? How will
virtually any device, right down to a lowly
light bulb, become a peer that connects
at will to the global data network?
we don’t need many
standards; we want one
Obviously, billions of devices of wildly
varying types cannot each receive indi-
vidual attention and configuration, or
conform to elaborate a priori specifica-
tions. If it literally takes a network engineer
to screw in a smart light bulb, pervasive
computing is never going to work.
Many schemes and so-called “stan-
dards” for device connectivity already
exist. But of course, all those “solutions”
add up to one big problem. We don’t
want many standards; we want one.
Of course, an elegant answer is offered
by IP which is predicated upon the idea
that we already have an excellent way
to get every conceivable device on the
Internet—the original design principles
and protocols of the Internet itself.
“Internet” is short for “internetworking.” The
Internet was designed in the 1960s to allow
the incompatible data networks and com-
puting systems of the time to share informa-
tion—to “talk to each other,” as people like
to say. The Internet is literally a “network of
networks.” That’s what the “inter” means.
Enabling Universal
Connectivity
12
smart systems manifesto white paper
The public Internet as we know it today is
a worldwide embodiment of those original
data communications protocols—which are,
by design, extremely simple. For this discus-
sion, their key attribute is that they make very
few assumptions about the data they are
sending and about the devices connecting
to the network to send and receive data.
It is this extensible, technology-neutral basis
of the Internet that has allowed it to scale so
dramatically (and gracefully) since its incep-
tion, with minimal central administration.
There have been previous high profile
examples of industries trying to create niche
standards for special purpose networks only
to eventually evolve to open IP standards
years later. This circumstance is typified by
the evolution of fieldbus networks in the
industrial arena in the 1990s and early part
of this decade. Several larger players slowed
down their own developments, plowed bil-
lions of dollars into supporting closed and
then ‘pseudo open’ standards and fought
over the spoils for nearly 20 years only to
find the market eventually came to under-
stand the benefits of open IP based network
standards. We see no reason that this lesson
from history shouldn’t be applied now.
Looking forward, Harbor Research believes
there is a major opportunity for select mar-
ket participants to act as an ‘IoT architect
or catalyst’ and harmonize the network
standards for short range WLAN and WSN
applications around an existing, new or
adapted suite of interoperable standards.
Our society is at the cusp of a “perfect storm”
of network connectivity. This phenomenon
is not just about the dichotomy between
people communicating with people or ma-
chines communicating with machines: it also
includes people communicating with ma-
chines (e.g. a networked ATM), and machines
communicating with people (e.g. automated
stock ticker alerts on your smartphone). The
concept of network effects states that the val-
ue of a network grows exponentially with the
number of nodes connected to it. Along with
the value, however, so too grows the com-
plexity of the software integrated into devices
and the reliance on people and organizations
developing and supporting these systems.
we are at the cusp
of a perfect storm
Automating Design and
Development
13
smart systems manifesto white paper
With the rapid growth of wireless networks,
connecting these devices to the Internet has
never been easier. The growth of devices
on the Internet today is chiefly occurring
in two distinct ways. The first is that previ-
ously separate networks – such as video,
voice, cellular, etc., - are all migrating toward
shared IP. This trend requires the Internet
to absorb wholesale transitions of full-scale
networks into its existing framework.
At the same time, new classes of devices are
becoming network enabled. The types of
devices being connected today extend far
beyond the laptops and cell phones we have
become so accustomed to. Today, virtually all
products that use electricity - from toys and
coffee makers to cars and medical diagnostic
machines - possess inherent data processing
capability and the potential to be networked.
The fact that a rapidly expanding range of
devices have the capability to automatically
transmit information about status, perfor-
mance and usage and can interact with
people and other devices anywhere in real
time points to the increasing complexity of
these devices. For example, software for
the average mobile phone contains over 10
million lines of code. Over the last five years,
software in automobiles has grown from an
average of 35 million lines of code to over 100
million. The astronomical growth of features
and functions within and among connected
devices pushes the bounds of what designers
of software for products ever had in mind.
Some basic design principles must be put
in place to guide the development of smart
connected devices. It demands that we
design not only devices and networks but
also information management systems in
ways not addressed by current IT technolo-
gies. The reader may ask, don’t we already
have a vast number of software products to
address these challenges? Don’t we have
real-time operating systems and develop-
ment tools? And aren’t these technologies
working together today quite handsomely?
Almost everyone will answer with a re-
sounding “Yes!” But consider this analogy
from Buckminster Fuller: Suppose you are
traveling on an ocean liner that suddenly
begins to sink. If you rip the lid off the grand
piano in the ballroom, throw it overboard,
and jump on it, the floating piano lid may
well save your life. But if, under normal
circumstances, you set about to design the
some basic design principles
must be put in place to guide the
development of smart devices
14
smart systems manifesto white paper
best possible life preserver, are you going
to come up with the lid of a grand piano?
The growing scale of interactions between
feature-rich devices and the antiquated tools
available today to develop them are like that
piano lid. In a period of great change and
tumult, it worked—in the sense that it kept
us afloat. But that does not make it the best
possible design, or qualify it to be something
that we should plan to live with forever.
The tools we are working with today to make
products “smart” were not designed to han-
dle the scope of new capabilities, the diversity
of devices and the massive volume of data-
points generated from device interactions.
These challenges are diluting the ability of
engineering organizations to efficiently and
effectively manage development. The frag-
mented nature of software offerings available
today make it extremely difficult, if not im-
possible, to leverage design and engineering
work across different platforms and devices.
What is needed is a common means of
development that can leverage tools, tasks
and code across families of interrelated
devices. Customers expect evolving soft-
ware tools to be functional, ubiquitous, and
easy-to-use. Within this construct, however,
the first two expectations run counter to the
third. In order to achieve all three, a new ap-
proach is required -- a unified development
framework for smart connected devices.
What would this entail:
»» Software tools and development pro-
tocols that work together seamlessly,
securely and safely across diverse de-
vices - historically sofware development
has been very distinct for different
types of products such as computers,
phones and other intelligent [non-IT]
equipment - in the future diverse device
segments will be served by increas-
ingly common software and tools.
»» Software that supports interoperability
over long product life cycles - the abil-
ity to support products for 15-20 year
life cycles and bridge complete tech-
nology shifts will be required. Devices
will require multiple code upgrades to
remain compatible and interoperable.
»» Software and development tools to
address a broad range of application
technology does not
have to breed complexity
15
smart systems manifesto white paper
requirements - increasingly, product man-
ufacturers will need to develop both GUI-
based/data centric applications as well
as low end “headless” non-GUI-based
systems where boot loaders, schedulers,
comms stacks and other OS components
are used. OEMs need a single unified
framework to design and build solu-
tions that can be certified to interoperate
across all the uP and OS classes they use.
»» Software and tools that leverage re-use
- given the scale of the Internet of Things
it will simply not be humanly possible
to write all the code required without
large scale re-use - the ability, for ex-
ample, to develop a security module or
comms stack that can be designed and
certified once but used multiple times.
We are reaching a critical juncture in mar-
ket development where engineering or-
ganizations will soon be crying out for a
completely new approach - one where the
operating system and its components can
be utilized again and again across an ever
broader spectrum of devices. We must
develop software and methods to automate
development and facilitate re-use, or risk
constraining the growth of this market.
IT professionals talk these days about
the need for ever-evolving information
services that can be made available any-
where, anytime, for any kind of informa-
tion. Most of this talk surrounds the advent
of cloud computing and services. All too
often, IT people speak about cloud and
web services with “the Internet” inter-
changeably without giving it a thought.
But the Web is not the Internet. The Internet
itself is a simple, elegant, extensible, scalable,
technology-neutral networking system that
will do exactly what it was designed to do
for the indefinite future. The same cannot be
said of the Web, which is essentially an ap-
plication running on top of the Internet. It is
hardly the only possible Internet application,
nor is it the most profound one conceivable.
The Web’s Achilles heel does not originate
in its browsing software, or markup lan-
guages, or the other superficial aspects
that most users touch directly. Those in-
ventions are not necessarily ideal, but they
are useful enough today, and they can be
we are reaching a critical juncture
where organizations will soon be crying
out for a completely new approach
Achieving Truly Flexible,
Scalable Systems
16
smart systems manifesto white paper
replaced over time with better alternatives.
Rather, the Web’s weakness lies with its
basic enabling technologies—in particular,
relational databasing and the client-server
model—and the restrictions they place upon
structuring, storing, and retrieving data.
The Web, and now cloud services, stores
information in one of two basic ways: utterly
unstructured, or far too rigidly structured.
The unstructured way gives us typical static
Web pages, blog postings, etc., in which the
basic unit of information is large, free-form,
and lacking any fundamental identity.
The overly structured way involves the use of
relational database tables that impose rigid,
pre-ordained schemas on stored informa-
tion. These schemas, designed by database
administrators in advance, are not at all
agile or easily extensible. Making even trivial
changes to these schemas is a cumbersome,
expensive process that affects all the data
inside them. Just as importantly, they make
deep, inflexible assumptions about the mean-
ing and context of the data they store. Both
of these approaches to data-structure enforce
severe limitations on the two things you want
most in a global, pervasive-era information
system: scalability and interoperability.
The client-server model underlying the Web
greatly compounds the problem. Regardless
of data-structure, when you put information
on the Web you put it in a specific physi-
cal location—i.e., you upload your HTML or
middleware files, or your database tables, to
a specific directory on a specific server. Thus,
a Web URL does not point to information
per se; it points to the information’s physi-
cal location, which is a very different thing.
This means that the Web is machine-centric,
not information-centric. Information on the
Web is not free to move, and because its life is
tied to the life of a physical machine, informa-
tion on the Web can easily become extinct.
If a particular server goes offline, temporar-
ily or forever, all its URLs are dead and the
information is unavailable. You can “mirror”
your data so that copies reside on multiple
servers, but this does not change the fact that
Web-based information is always tethered
to specific locations on specific machines.
All of this adds up to a huge collection of
information-islands called the World Wide
Web. Assuming the islands remain in exis-
tence reliably, they are still fundamentally
incapable of truly interoperating with other
information-islands. We can create bridges
today’s cloud and
IT world are still
disconnected islands
17
smart systems manifesto white paper
between them, but islands they remain.
That’s what they were designed to be.
The latest bridges are called “cloud broker-
ing services,” by which islands automati-
cally “feed” information to each other. In
terms of convenience for human beings,
Web services are a distinct advance over
manually navigating Web pages. You can
now set up a browser page or a desktop
applet to “consume” (receive and display) a
Web-feed of news headlines, stock quotes,
weather information, package tracking, and
so on. And that’s a good thing—a pleas-
ant, time-saving, incremental improve-
ment on yesterday’s way of doing things.
But many people talk about Web and
cloud services as “the next big thing,”
and if that’s true we can only say: We
were hoping for something bigger. Con-
suming a cloud service is exactly the
same thing as loading a Web page.
All of these new services are still prey to the
client-server rigidity and vulnerability we’ve
described, making them particularly unsuit-
able for vital public information services. And
in order to concatenate information from
diverse sources, these services depend upon
data-tagging conventions that require yet
more layers of prior agreement, schemas,
markup, and manual human administration.
With each additional layer of such engineer-
ing and administration, the Web comes
closer and closer to resembling a fantasti-
cally jury-rigged Rube Goldberg contraption.
The reason is simple. These new comput-
ing schemes were not designed for a world
driven by pervasive information flow.
In today’s world, information is not free (and
that’s free as in “freedom,” not free as in “free
of charge”). In fact, thanks to present infor-
mation architectures, it’s not free to easily
merge with other information and enable
any kind of search-based intelligence.
What would truly liberated information be
like? It might help to think of the atoms
and molecules of the physical world. They
have distinct identities, of course, but they
are also capable of bonding with other
what would truly
liberated information be like?
Leveraging Collective
Intelligence
18
smart systems manifesto white paper
The traditional approaches to data discovery
and systems intelligence have two failings:
they can’t provide a holistic view of these
diverse data types and, the types of intelligence
tools available to users are, at best, arcane
and typically limited in use to “specialists.”
Users need new ways to find informa-
tion and discover patterns on their own,
without requiring specialists or IT sup-
port. This allows users to determine where
deeper analytics or the creation of an ad
hoc business process can add value.
Given the immature state of today’s real-world
systems, most people have trouble grasping
the power and importance these capabilities
enable. The ability to detect patterns in data is
the holy grail of smart systems and The Internet
of Things because it allows not only patterns
but a whole higher order of intelligence to
emerge from large collections of ordinary data.
The implications are obviously immense.
We need an entirely new approach that
avoids the confinements and limitations of
the today’s differing data types and tools. It
allows data to maintain their fundamental
identity while bonding freely with other data.
Facilitating discovery, based on data and
information accessibility, fusion and cumula-
atoms and molecules to create entirely dif-
ferent kinds of matter. Often this bonding
requires special circumstances, such as ex-
treme heat or pressure, but not always.
In the world of information, such bonding is
not all that easy. Today’s software platforms
focus on execution processes that generate
one of three types of data - unstructured,
transactional or time series. For each of these
data types, a specific set of intelligence tools
have evolved to provide “insight” but, in most
cases, these tools limit the questions that can
be answered to those known in advance. So for
a user attempting to do something as simple
as asking a certain multi-dimensional ques-
tion, creating new information from multiple
data types that is an easily perceivable, ma-
nipulable, or mappable “model” of the answer
to that question is a significant challenge.
The Internet of Things requires new platforms
to fundamentally changes this paradigm,
treating data from things, people, systems
and the physical world as augmented repre-
sentations. In other words, treating diverse
data types equally. This enables processes
connecting diverse data in any combina-
tion to be rapidly built and deployed.
traditional approaches to
systems intelligence won’t
work in the smart sytems world
19
smart systems manifesto white paper
tive systems intelligence, is a fundamental goal
for information systems. The world needs
systems designed for a genuinely connected
world in which there are no artificial barriers
between pieces and types of information.
Smart connected devices are a global
and economic phenomenon of unprec-
edented scale - potentially billions if not
trillions of nodes will be connected if the
right technology and business architec-
tures are in place. Today the relationship
between the evolving technologies driv-
ing the Internet of Things and the business
models that these systems could inform is
“disconnected” and problematic at best.
Apple and some of its peers in consumer
space present an interesting case for how
Smart Business models are developing. Apple
is primarily a consumer-focused tech ven-
dor, with no need for the vertical industry
capabilities required in B2B applications.
Still, Apple provides a model for creating a
Smart System solution that pulls together
technologies from multiple domains and
packages that solution in a way that wins
buyer acceptance. Looking beyond Apple to
Google, Amazon, Facebook and other play-
ers coming from their roots in the evolving
consumer mobile internet arena, there are
a variety of new business models emerging
from cloud and related services platform
players that are the embodiment of Smart
Systems. Add to this the momentum from
these players are creating via collaboration
with their app communities -- Amazon has
over 100,000 developers building applica-
tions and businesses; Apple’s App Store has
created a phenomenal lead position -- they
are all driving entirely new forms of col-
laboration and peer product development.
The traditional notion of M2M applica-
tions has largely grown up in a B2B context
-- equipment manufacturers developing
remote services and support automation tied
closely to their equipment services contracts.
These models are focused almost exclusively
on customer support and automation -- not
on new Smart Services value beyond sup-
port. As these two classes of business models
inch closer to each other in the marketplace
it is increasingly evident that consumer smart
Smart Systems Impact On
Evolving Business Models
new business models and new
business design practices are
required to realize the potential
20
smart systems manifesto white paper
business models provide many lessons for the
“cloistered” equipment manufacturers in B2B
arenas. The business benefits of large scale
collaboration and social networking tools in
the B2B arena are finally being recognized.
Executives in many product manufactur-
ing companies are only just beginning
to understand the opportunities driven
by the complicity between collabora-
tion tools, networked device intelligence
and service business design and it is
this set of relationships, not the techno-
logical shift, that will benefit but also chal-
lenge many product manufacturers.
What product manufacturers looking to-
leverage collaboration or benefit from
connecting “smart products” to the In-
ternet need to understand is we have en-
tered a phase in the marketplace where
ideas can emerge from anywhere in the
world; new network and IT tools have
dramatically reduced the cost of utilizing
them. The bottom line: no single company
should look to innovate on their own.
Collaborative communities both inform
and express the strategy. Built to pursue
multiple aims simultaneously, a dynamic
network of connected products and people
drive new information values which, in turn,
create new influences in the marketplace.
Power in human and device collaboration
structures falls to those who best under-
stand how to use this information and
influence to get and keep a key position.
Forging collaborative communities means
managing uncertainty. A product OEM
needs a clear understanding of the forces
at work between and among devices and
people. They must try to identify those few
“interactions” that make a difference. From
this understanding provided via real time
interactions, early indicators of the true
direction of customer needs and behaviors
can be understood long before others.
we are just beginning to understand
the opportunities driven by the
complicity between collaboration
tools, networked device intelligence
and service business design
21
smart systems manifesto white paper
Some things that look easy turn out to be
hard. That’s part of the strange saga of the
Internet of Things and its perpetual attempts
to get itself off the ground. But some things
that should be kept simple are allowed to
get unnecessarily complex, and that’s the
other part of the story. The drive to develop
technology can inspire grandiose visions
that make simple thinking seem somehow
embarrassing or not worthwhile. That’s not
a good thing when defining and deploying
real-world technology to deliver innovation.
This is where the new values of a true smart
systems architecture really come into focus.
We’ve articulated a “smart systems”
vision and road map that empha-
sizes several points, including:
»» The architecture required to inform
an Internet of Things looks nothing
like today’s kludge diagrams of smart
devices connected to clouds; it will
inevitably evolve to a radically dif-
ferent peer-to-peer architecture.
»» As the architecture evolves, the defini-
tions of its most basic elements that
everyone is so anxious to quan-
tify today (servers, devices, routers,
hubs, etc.) will change radically.
»» What most people who do not under-
stand this evolution are missing is that
you cannot accurately quantify the
future state of the Internet of Things
by merely counting today’s mess of
architecture and systems elements.
Today the world of smart communicating
devices is mostly organized in hierarchies
with smart user interface devices at the
top and the dumb devices [often analog
or serial sensors and actuators] at the bot-
tom. Within this structure, there are typically
various types of “middle box” supervisory
devices forming a point of connectivity and
control for the sensors and actuators as well
as the infrastructure for the network. From
our perspective, this description of today’s
M2M, remote services and connected sys-
tems architectures looks very familiar and
is largely organized much like client-server
based computer systems….. no surprise
given they were designed in the 1980’s.
How Should We View Future
Smart Systems Architecture?
22
smart systems manifesto white paper
As the Internet of Things opportunity ex-
pands, the sensor and actuator devices will
all become smart themselves and the con-
nectivity between them (devices, for the
most part, that have never been connected)
will become more and more complex. As the
numbers of smart devices grow, the exist-
ing client-server hierarchy and the related
“middle boxes” acting as hubs, controllers
and interfaces will quickly start to blur. In this
future-state, the need for any kind of tradi-
tional client-server architecture will become
superfluous. In a future Internet of Things, the
days of hierarchical models are numbered.
Now, imagine a future smart systems world
where sensors and devices that were once
connected by twisted pair, current loops or
were hardwired become networked with all
devices integrated onto one IP-based net-
work (wired or wireless). In this new world,
the “middle boxes” don’t need traditional
input/output (I/O) hardware or interfaces.
They begin to look just like network com-
puters running applications designed to
interact with peer devices and carry out
functions with their “herd” or “clusters”
of smart sensors and devices – let’s call
these new middle boxes, “aggregators”.
We can readily imagine an application
environment where there may be several
aggregators running applications which
overlap sharing their sensors and actua-
tors, some even ‘sharing’ a whole herd – a
smart building application, for example,
where the processor in an occupancy sen-
sor is used to turn the lights on, change the
heating or cooling profile or alert security.
In this evolving architecture, the network
essentially flattens until the end-point
devices are merely peers and a variety of
applications reside on one or more net-
work controllers which look for all intents
and purposes like today’s cellular router/
modems, industrial PCs or small “head-
less” high availability distributed servers.
In a smart systems application world de-
signed to capture, log and analyze large vol-
umes of data from sensors, the aggregators,
such as we are describing here, will carry out
the process of taking raw data and distilling it
into information “locally.” Local processing is
required to reduce the otherwise untenable
Internet traffic challenges that arise from con-
necting billions of devices. The notion that
all these “things” and devices will produce
streaming data that has to be processed in
some cloud will simply not work. It makes
the notion that all these“things”and
devices will produce streaming data
that has to be processed in some
cloud will simply not work
23
smart systems manifesto white paper
more sense structurally and economically to
execute these interactions in a more distrib-
uted architecture near the sensors and actua-
tors where the application-context prevails.
This is the move we’ve all been waiting for
to a truly distributed architecture because
today’s systems will not be able to scale and
interact effectively where there are billions of
nodes involved. In this portrayal, the aggre-
gators will become peers in a network along
with the sensors, actuators and controllers
whether or not they have GUIs (headed) or
not (headless). The aggregators will also
become unified application platforms from
which to provide services to devices and
users where the applications run, where
the data is turned into information, where
storage takes place, and where the brows-
ing of information ultimately takes place
too – not in some server farm in a cloud data
center. Even the mobile handsets we admire
so much today are but a tiny class of user
interface and communications devices in
an Internet of Things world where there will
be 100 times more “things” than humans.
In this future Smart Systems arena, the
architecture and relationship structures
between and among smart devices will be-
come more or less flat. Hierarchy will disap-
pear. Peer-to-peer will become the “norm”
for interactions (with its attendant benefits
and pitfalls). From our view the movement
towards peer-to-peer, and the view that many
people hold that this is somehow novel, is
ironic given that the Internet was originally
designed for peer-to-peer interactions.
This is a vast opportunity of untold scale.
If we hypothesize that there will be 2-5
“headed” user interface devices for every
person on the planet – say 12-30 billion in the
future. Of these, if 4-5 billion will be por-
table and/or low power, there will likely be
30-40 billion controller/aggregator devices,
potentially managing around 60-100 billion
end-point sensor/actuator devices – a ratio
of 20:1 or so…and that’s just the relatively
Smart Systems Is A Radical
Departure From Current
Thinking
24
smart systems manifesto white paper
near term. When you think there are only 1
billion PCs on the planet and 3 billion cell
phones, this all starts to come into focus
and in many ways, aggregators will be the
next “PC”…but with 30X more of them.
Today we can only see the beginnings of
this structurally: Industrial PC’s, communica-
tions hubs and all manner of gateway-like
boxes all morphing to aggregators with
handsets and tablets morphing to universal
user interface devices. In this vision all we
can hear in the today’s marketplace is the
siren song of client-server and Cloud stories.
In our years of experience, we have all too
often seen the unfortunate scenarios that
managers create when uncertainty and
complexity force them to rely on selective
attention. Unfortunately, when this hap-
pens, selective attention naturally gravitates
toward what’s readily available: past experi-
ence and uncertain assumptions. Today’s IT
and telco infrastructure players are doing just
this. By ignoring important trends simply
because it’s difficult to perceive an alternative
future, these managers are certainly leaving
the door open for competition that will lead
to their eventual obsolescence…which will
make for a very interesting world to live in…
Though their business models are inter-
mingling today, all of the major categories
of suppliers in the “traditional” so-called
M2M software arena have historically oper-
ated within well-established assumptions
about product scope and business models.
No one would characterize the existing
players of being technology or business
model innovators or disruptive in nature.
Radical new thinking about information tech-
nology must begin at the most basic levels,
with new conceptions about the interactions
of information with people, systems and
devices. We think more about future proof-
ing innovations by making the fewest pos-
sible assumptions about the nature of net-
worked objects and the data they produce,
carry or process - we need a much broader,
all-encompassing view of information.
Ultimately, this type of smart systems archi-
tecture will alter traditional business models
and how new applications are realized.
Since all of this that we are describing is a
radical departure from current offerings and
business practices, and is driven by a very
Getting There First; But To
Where?
25
smart systems manifesto white paper
unique set of needs, it stands to reason that
these types of solutions do not fall within the
narrow specialties of the existing players. In
fact, the architecture being described is prob-
ably best viewed as an entirely new market
category. This is particularly true given the
disjointed patchwork of solutions presently
in place and the apparent lack of vision from
existing players of what’s required in the
future. The opportunity to lead in developing
and shaping this market looks wide open.
ABOUT HARBOR RESEARCH
Founded in 1984, Harbor Research Inc. has
more than twenty five years of experience in
providing strategic consulting and research
services that enable our clients to understand
and capitalize on emergent and disruptive op-
portunities driven by information and commu-
nications technology. The firm has established
a unique competence in developing business
models and strategy for the convergence of
pervasive computing, global networking and
smart systems.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Internet of Things (IoT): More than Smart “Things”
Internet of Things (IoT): More than Smart “Things”Internet of Things (IoT): More than Smart “Things”
Internet of Things (IoT): More than Smart “Things”Ahmed Banafa
 
IoT : Research, Development, Challenges
IoT: Research, Development, ChallengesIoT: Research, Development, Challenges
IoT : Research, Development, Challengesbaddi youssef
 
Openbar 11 - Leuven - IoT from hype to reality - Aptus
Openbar 11 - Leuven - IoT from hype to reality - AptusOpenbar 11 - Leuven - IoT from hype to reality - Aptus
Openbar 11 - Leuven - IoT from hype to reality - AptusOpenbar
 
Process oriented architecture for digital transformation 2015
Process oriented architecture for digital transformation   2015Process oriented architecture for digital transformation   2015
Process oriented architecture for digital transformation 2015Vinay Mummigatti
 
Building the Next Smart City With Mobile Cyber-Physical Systems
Building the Next Smart City With Mobile Cyber-Physical SystemsBuilding the Next Smart City With Mobile Cyber-Physical Systems
Building the Next Smart City With Mobile Cyber-Physical SystemsDr. Mazlan Abbas
 
[DevDay2019] Internet of Things- By: Dr. Anand Nayyar at Duy Tan University
[DevDay2019] Internet of Things- By: Dr. Anand Nayyar at Duy Tan University[DevDay2019] Internet of Things- By: Dr. Anand Nayyar at Duy Tan University
[DevDay2019] Internet of Things- By: Dr. Anand Nayyar at Duy Tan UniversityDevDay.org
 
rp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xg
rp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xgrp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xg
rp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xgMartin Marshall
 
rp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xg
rp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xgrp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xg
rp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xgErica Finelli
 
Iot visualise-the-impact-aralık2016
Iot visualise-the-impact-aralık2016Iot visualise-the-impact-aralık2016
Iot visualise-the-impact-aralık2016Mustafa Kuğu
 
TheInternetofThings
TheInternetofThingsTheInternetofThings
TheInternetofThingsKimmiegrif
 
IoT and its application by Akash Singh
IoT and its application by Akash SinghIoT and its application by Akash Singh
IoT and its application by Akash SinghAkash Rajput
 
Internet of Things - Benefits for the Ummah
Internet of Things - Benefits for the UmmahInternet of Things - Benefits for the Ummah
Internet of Things - Benefits for the UmmahDr. Mazlan Abbas
 
IT Innovation @ The Internet of Things
IT Innovation @ The Internet of ThingsIT Innovation @ The Internet of Things
IT Innovation @ The Internet of ThingsKim Escherich
 
Internet of thing(iot)
Internet of thing(iot)Internet of thing(iot)
Internet of thing(iot)Nazifa95
 
Glassbeam Drives Analytics Innovation
Glassbeam Drives Analytics InnovationGlassbeam Drives Analytics Innovation
Glassbeam Drives Analytics InnovationHarbor Research
 
The Internet of Things Conference at E4
The Internet of Things Conference at E4The Internet of Things Conference at E4
The Internet of Things Conference at E4rAVe [PUBS]
 

Was ist angesagt? (19)

IoT In Smart Everything
IoT In Smart EverythingIoT In Smart Everything
IoT In Smart Everything
 
Internet of Things (IoT): More than Smart “Things”
Internet of Things (IoT): More than Smart “Things”Internet of Things (IoT): More than Smart “Things”
Internet of Things (IoT): More than Smart “Things”
 
IoT : Research, Development, Challenges
IoT: Research, Development, ChallengesIoT: Research, Development, Challenges
IoT : Research, Development, Challenges
 
Openbar 11 - Leuven - IoT from hype to reality - Aptus
Openbar 11 - Leuven - IoT from hype to reality - AptusOpenbar 11 - Leuven - IoT from hype to reality - Aptus
Openbar 11 - Leuven - IoT from hype to reality - Aptus
 
Process oriented architecture for digital transformation 2015
Process oriented architecture for digital transformation   2015Process oriented architecture for digital transformation   2015
Process oriented architecture for digital transformation 2015
 
Building the Next Smart City With Mobile Cyber-Physical Systems
Building the Next Smart City With Mobile Cyber-Physical SystemsBuilding the Next Smart City With Mobile Cyber-Physical Systems
Building the Next Smart City With Mobile Cyber-Physical Systems
 
[DevDay2019] Internet of Things- By: Dr. Anand Nayyar at Duy Tan University
[DevDay2019] Internet of Things- By: Dr. Anand Nayyar at Duy Tan University[DevDay2019] Internet of Things- By: Dr. Anand Nayyar at Duy Tan University
[DevDay2019] Internet of Things- By: Dr. Anand Nayyar at Duy Tan University
 
rp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xg
rp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xgrp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xg
rp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xg
 
rp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xg
rp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xgrp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xg
rp_state-of-market-the-market-the-internet-of-things-2015_en_xg
 
Internet of Things
Internet of ThingsInternet of Things
Internet of Things
 
Iot visualise-the-impact-aralık2016
Iot visualise-the-impact-aralık2016Iot visualise-the-impact-aralık2016
Iot visualise-the-impact-aralık2016
 
TheInternetofThings
TheInternetofThingsTheInternetofThings
TheInternetofThings
 
IoT and its application by Akash Singh
IoT and its application by Akash SinghIoT and its application by Akash Singh
IoT and its application by Akash Singh
 
Internet of Things - Benefits for the Ummah
Internet of Things - Benefits for the UmmahInternet of Things - Benefits for the Ummah
Internet of Things - Benefits for the Ummah
 
IT Innovation @ The Internet of Things
IT Innovation @ The Internet of ThingsIT Innovation @ The Internet of Things
IT Innovation @ The Internet of Things
 
Internet of thing(iot)
Internet of thing(iot)Internet of thing(iot)
Internet of thing(iot)
 
Glassbeam Drives Analytics Innovation
Glassbeam Drives Analytics InnovationGlassbeam Drives Analytics Innovation
Glassbeam Drives Analytics Innovation
 
IoT Startup State of The Union
IoT Startup State of The Union  IoT Startup State of The Union
IoT Startup State of The Union
 
The Internet of Things Conference at E4
The Internet of Things Conference at E4The Internet of Things Conference at E4
The Internet of Things Conference at E4
 

Ähnlich wie Smart Systems and Internet of Things Manifesto

Smart systems manifesto: roadmap for the Internet of Things
Smart systems manifesto: roadmap for the Internet of ThingsSmart systems manifesto: roadmap for the Internet of Things
Smart systems manifesto: roadmap for the Internet of ThingsThe Marketing Distillery
 
Eurotech reinvents Embedded Connected Computing for M2M. Machine-to-Machine c...
Eurotech reinvents Embedded Connected Computing for M2M. Machine-to-Machine c...Eurotech reinvents Embedded Connected Computing for M2M. Machine-to-Machine c...
Eurotech reinvents Embedded Connected Computing for M2M. Machine-to-Machine c...Eurotech
 
Qtility Whitepaper - Integration Innovation 2015 - Trends In Content Management
Qtility Whitepaper - Integration Innovation 2015 - Trends In Content ManagementQtility Whitepaper - Integration Innovation 2015 - Trends In Content Management
Qtility Whitepaper - Integration Innovation 2015 - Trends In Content Managementclarkems
 
Consumidores Digitais: The Executive's Guide to the Internet of Things (ZD Net)
Consumidores Digitais: The Executive's Guide to the Internet of Things (ZD Net)Consumidores Digitais: The Executive's Guide to the Internet of Things (ZD Net)
Consumidores Digitais: The Executive's Guide to the Internet of Things (ZD Net)Consumidores Digitais
 
Harbor Research - Strategies for Smart Services
Harbor Research - Strategies for Smart ServicesHarbor Research - Strategies for Smart Services
Harbor Research - Strategies for Smart ServicesHarbor Research
 
Cognitive IoT Whitepaper_Dec 2015
Cognitive IoT Whitepaper_Dec 2015Cognitive IoT Whitepaper_Dec 2015
Cognitive IoT Whitepaper_Dec 2015Nikhil Dikshit
 
Internet of Things
Internet of ThingsInternet of Things
Internet of ThingsMphasis
 
Eurotech: Smart Systems Innovator by Harbor Research
Eurotech: Smart Systems Innovator by Harbor ResearchEurotech: Smart Systems Innovator by Harbor Research
Eurotech: Smart Systems Innovator by Harbor ResearchEurotech
 
Internet of Things - Asked and Answered
Internet of Things - Asked and AnsweredInternet of Things - Asked and Answered
Internet of Things - Asked and AnsweredADCBarcode
 
IoT's rapid evolution marks the next stage in the innovation economy - White ...
IoT's rapid evolution marks the next stage in the innovation economy - White ...IoT's rapid evolution marks the next stage in the innovation economy - White ...
IoT's rapid evolution marks the next stage in the innovation economy - White ...Technicolor
 
The Fourth Industrial Revolution – Internet of Things to Tighten the Link bet...
The Fourth Industrial Revolution – Internet of Things to Tighten the Link bet...The Fourth Industrial Revolution – Internet of Things to Tighten the Link bet...
The Fourth Industrial Revolution – Internet of Things to Tighten the Link bet...VINTlabs | The Sogeti Trendlab
 
Sogeti things - the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the li...
Sogeti   things - the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the li...Sogeti   things - the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the li...
Sogeti things - the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the li...polenumerique33
 
Unlocking-Business-Value-Through-Industrial-Data-Management-whitepaper.pdf
Unlocking-Business-Value-Through-Industrial-Data-Management-whitepaper.pdfUnlocking-Business-Value-Through-Industrial-Data-Management-whitepaper.pdf
Unlocking-Business-Value-Through-Industrial-Data-Management-whitepaper.pdfJaninePimentel4
 
An Overview of Internet of Things (IoT): From Literature Survey to Applicatio...
An Overview of Internet of Things (IoT): From Literature Survey to Applicatio...An Overview of Internet of Things (IoT): From Literature Survey to Applicatio...
An Overview of Internet of Things (IoT): From Literature Survey to Applicatio...IRJET Journal
 
Report 3 the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the link betwe...
Report 3  the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the link betwe...Report 3  the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the link betwe...
Report 3 the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the link betwe...Rick Bouter
 
Security Of The Internet Of Things
Security Of The Internet Of ThingsSecurity Of The Internet Of Things
Security Of The Internet Of ThingsMonica Cordova
 
ThingsConAMS - Stakeholders in a new world - Rob van Kranenburg
ThingsConAMS - Stakeholders in a new world - Rob van KranenburgThingsConAMS - Stakeholders in a new world - Rob van Kranenburg
ThingsConAMS - Stakeholders in a new world - Rob van KranenburgThingsConAMS
 

Ähnlich wie Smart Systems and Internet of Things Manifesto (20)

Smart systems manifesto: roadmap for the Internet of Things
Smart systems manifesto: roadmap for the Internet of ThingsSmart systems manifesto: roadmap for the Internet of Things
Smart systems manifesto: roadmap for the Internet of Things
 
Eurotech reinvents Embedded Connected Computing for M2M. Machine-to-Machine c...
Eurotech reinvents Embedded Connected Computing for M2M. Machine-to-Machine c...Eurotech reinvents Embedded Connected Computing for M2M. Machine-to-Machine c...
Eurotech reinvents Embedded Connected Computing for M2M. Machine-to-Machine c...
 
Qtility Whitepaper - Integration Innovation 2015 - Trends In Content Management
Qtility Whitepaper - Integration Innovation 2015 - Trends In Content ManagementQtility Whitepaper - Integration Innovation 2015 - Trends In Content Management
Qtility Whitepaper - Integration Innovation 2015 - Trends In Content Management
 
The Genius of Things
The Genius of ThingsThe Genius of Things
The Genius of Things
 
Consumidores Digitais: The Executive's Guide to the Internet of Things (ZD Net)
Consumidores Digitais: The Executive's Guide to the Internet of Things (ZD Net)Consumidores Digitais: The Executive's Guide to the Internet of Things (ZD Net)
Consumidores Digitais: The Executive's Guide to the Internet of Things (ZD Net)
 
Harbor Research - Strategies for Smart Services
Harbor Research - Strategies for Smart ServicesHarbor Research - Strategies for Smart Services
Harbor Research - Strategies for Smart Services
 
Cognitive IoT Whitepaper_Dec 2015
Cognitive IoT Whitepaper_Dec 2015Cognitive IoT Whitepaper_Dec 2015
Cognitive IoT Whitepaper_Dec 2015
 
Internet of Things
Internet of ThingsInternet of Things
Internet of Things
 
Eurotech: Smart Systems Innovator by Harbor Research
Eurotech: Smart Systems Innovator by Harbor ResearchEurotech: Smart Systems Innovator by Harbor Research
Eurotech: Smart Systems Innovator by Harbor Research
 
Internet of Things - Asked and Answered
Internet of Things - Asked and AnsweredInternet of Things - Asked and Answered
Internet of Things - Asked and Answered
 
IoT's rapid evolution marks the next stage in the innovation economy - White ...
IoT's rapid evolution marks the next stage in the innovation economy - White ...IoT's rapid evolution marks the next stage in the innovation economy - White ...
IoT's rapid evolution marks the next stage in the innovation economy - White ...
 
The Fourth Industrial Revolution – Internet of Things to Tighten the Link bet...
The Fourth Industrial Revolution – Internet of Things to Tighten the Link bet...The Fourth Industrial Revolution – Internet of Things to Tighten the Link bet...
The Fourth Industrial Revolution – Internet of Things to Tighten the Link bet...
 
Sogeti things - the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the li...
Sogeti   things - the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the li...Sogeti   things - the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the li...
Sogeti things - the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the li...
 
Io t white-paper-final-fr-1
Io t white-paper-final-fr-1Io t white-paper-final-fr-1
Io t white-paper-final-fr-1
 
Unlocking-Business-Value-Through-Industrial-Data-Management-whitepaper.pdf
Unlocking-Business-Value-Through-Industrial-Data-Management-whitepaper.pdfUnlocking-Business-Value-Through-Industrial-Data-Management-whitepaper.pdf
Unlocking-Business-Value-Through-Industrial-Data-Management-whitepaper.pdf
 
An Overview of Internet of Things (IoT): From Literature Survey to Applicatio...
An Overview of Internet of Things (IoT): From Literature Survey to Applicatio...An Overview of Internet of Things (IoT): From Literature Survey to Applicatio...
An Overview of Internet of Things (IoT): From Literature Survey to Applicatio...
 
Report 3 the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the link betwe...
Report 3  the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the link betwe...Report 3  the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the link betwe...
Report 3 the fourth industrial revolution - things to tighten the link betwe...
 
Security Of The Internet Of Things
Security Of The Internet Of ThingsSecurity Of The Internet Of Things
Security Of The Internet Of Things
 
IOTCYBER
IOTCYBERIOTCYBER
IOTCYBER
 
ThingsConAMS - Stakeholders in a new world - Rob van Kranenburg
ThingsConAMS - Stakeholders in a new world - Rob van KranenburgThingsConAMS - Stakeholders in a new world - Rob van Kranenburg
ThingsConAMS - Stakeholders in a new world - Rob van Kranenburg
 

Mehr von Harbor Research

Harbor Research: IoT Investment Report - June 2017
Harbor Research: IoT Investment Report - June 2017Harbor Research: IoT Investment Report - June 2017
Harbor Research: IoT Investment Report - June 2017Harbor Research
 
Harbor Research: 3D Printing Growth Opportunity
Harbor Research: 3D Printing Growth OpportunityHarbor Research: 3D Printing Growth Opportunity
Harbor Research: 3D Printing Growth OpportunityHarbor Research
 
Augmented & Mixed Reality Opportunity Snapshot
Augmented & Mixed Reality Opportunity SnapshotAugmented & Mixed Reality Opportunity Snapshot
Augmented & Mixed Reality Opportunity SnapshotHarbor Research
 
Internet of Things Investment Report - February 2017
Internet of Things Investment Report - February 2017Internet of Things Investment Report - February 2017
Internet of Things Investment Report - February 2017Harbor Research
 
Smart Business Design In The Age of The Internet of Things
Smart Business Design In The Age of The Internet of ThingsSmart Business Design In The Age of The Internet of Things
Smart Business Design In The Age of The Internet of ThingsHarbor Research
 
Harbor Research's Infographic on the Internet of Things and Smart Services
Harbor Research's Infographic on the Internet of Things and Smart ServicesHarbor Research's Infographic on the Internet of Things and Smart Services
Harbor Research's Infographic on the Internet of Things and Smart ServicesHarbor Research
 
Harbor Research - Smart Services, Product Analytics, & Intelligence
Harbor Research - Smart Services, Product Analytics, & IntelligenceHarbor Research - Smart Services, Product Analytics, & Intelligence
Harbor Research - Smart Services, Product Analytics, & IntelligenceHarbor Research
 
Harbor Research - M2M Industry Landscape Map
Harbor Research - M2M Industry Landscape MapHarbor Research - M2M Industry Landscape Map
Harbor Research - M2M Industry Landscape MapHarbor Research
 
Harbor Research - Introduction to Smart Business & M2M
Harbor Research - Introduction to Smart Business & M2MHarbor Research - Introduction to Smart Business & M2M
Harbor Research - Introduction to Smart Business & M2MHarbor Research
 
Harbor Research - Designing Security for the Internet of Things & Smart Devices
Harbor Research - Designing Security for the Internet of Things & Smart DevicesHarbor Research - Designing Security for the Internet of Things & Smart Devices
Harbor Research - Designing Security for the Internet of Things & Smart DevicesHarbor Research
 
Harbor Research - The Internet of Things Meets the Internet of People
Harbor Research - The Internet of Things Meets the Internet of PeopleHarbor Research - The Internet of Things Meets the Internet of People
Harbor Research - The Internet of Things Meets the Internet of PeopleHarbor Research
 

Mehr von Harbor Research (11)

Harbor Research: IoT Investment Report - June 2017
Harbor Research: IoT Investment Report - June 2017Harbor Research: IoT Investment Report - June 2017
Harbor Research: IoT Investment Report - June 2017
 
Harbor Research: 3D Printing Growth Opportunity
Harbor Research: 3D Printing Growth OpportunityHarbor Research: 3D Printing Growth Opportunity
Harbor Research: 3D Printing Growth Opportunity
 
Augmented & Mixed Reality Opportunity Snapshot
Augmented & Mixed Reality Opportunity SnapshotAugmented & Mixed Reality Opportunity Snapshot
Augmented & Mixed Reality Opportunity Snapshot
 
Internet of Things Investment Report - February 2017
Internet of Things Investment Report - February 2017Internet of Things Investment Report - February 2017
Internet of Things Investment Report - February 2017
 
Smart Business Design In The Age of The Internet of Things
Smart Business Design In The Age of The Internet of ThingsSmart Business Design In The Age of The Internet of Things
Smart Business Design In The Age of The Internet of Things
 
Harbor Research's Infographic on the Internet of Things and Smart Services
Harbor Research's Infographic on the Internet of Things and Smart ServicesHarbor Research's Infographic on the Internet of Things and Smart Services
Harbor Research's Infographic on the Internet of Things and Smart Services
 
Harbor Research - Smart Services, Product Analytics, & Intelligence
Harbor Research - Smart Services, Product Analytics, & IntelligenceHarbor Research - Smart Services, Product Analytics, & Intelligence
Harbor Research - Smart Services, Product Analytics, & Intelligence
 
Harbor Research - M2M Industry Landscape Map
Harbor Research - M2M Industry Landscape MapHarbor Research - M2M Industry Landscape Map
Harbor Research - M2M Industry Landscape Map
 
Harbor Research - Introduction to Smart Business & M2M
Harbor Research - Introduction to Smart Business & M2MHarbor Research - Introduction to Smart Business & M2M
Harbor Research - Introduction to Smart Business & M2M
 
Harbor Research - Designing Security for the Internet of Things & Smart Devices
Harbor Research - Designing Security for the Internet of Things & Smart DevicesHarbor Research - Designing Security for the Internet of Things & Smart Devices
Harbor Research - Designing Security for the Internet of Things & Smart Devices
 
Harbor Research - The Internet of Things Meets the Internet of People
Harbor Research - The Internet of Things Meets the Internet of PeopleHarbor Research - The Internet of Things Meets the Internet of People
Harbor Research - The Internet of Things Meets the Internet of People
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IES VE
 
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...DianaGray10
 
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )Brian Pichman
 
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopNIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopBachir Benyammi
 
ADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE
ADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDEADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE
ADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDELiveplex
 
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXVoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXTarek Kalaji
 
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UbiTrack UK
 
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxCybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxGDSC PJATK
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6DianaGray10
 
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-pyJamie (Taka) Wang
 
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdfNanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdfPedro Manuel
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7DianaGray10
 
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.YounusS2
 
AI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity Webinar
AI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity WebinarAI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity Webinar
AI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity WebinarPrecisely
 
Empowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership Blueprint
Empowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership BlueprintEmpowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership Blueprint
Empowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership BlueprintMahmoud Rabie
 
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfJamie (Taka) Wang
 
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online CollaborationCOMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaborationbruanjhuli
 
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and HazardsComputer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and HazardsSeth Reyes
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
 
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
Connector Corner: Extending LLM automation use cases with UiPath GenAI connec...
 
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
 
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 WorkshopNIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 Workshop
 
ADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE
ADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDEADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE
ADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE
 
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXVoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
 
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
 
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxCybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 6
 
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
 
20150722 - AGV
20150722 - AGV20150722 - AGV
20150722 - AGV
 
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdfNanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
 
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
 
AI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity Webinar
AI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity WebinarAI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity Webinar
AI You Can Trust - Ensuring Success with Data Integrity Webinar
 
Empowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership Blueprint
Empowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership BlueprintEmpowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership Blueprint
Empowering Africa's Next Generation: The AI Leadership Blueprint
 
201610817 - edge part1
201610817 - edge part1201610817 - edge part1
201610817 - edge part1
 
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
activity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdfactivity_diagram_combine_v4_20190827.pdf
 
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online CollaborationCOMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
 
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and HazardsComputer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
 

Smart Systems and Internet of Things Manifesto

  • 1. Smart Systems Manifesto road map for the internet of things white paper Harbor Research How networked computing and the physical world are merging to transform civilization
  • 2. 2 smart systems manifesto white paper T HE BIT, THE BYTE, AND LATER THE PACKET MADE POSSIBLE THE ENTIRE ENTERPRISE OF DIGITAL COMPUTING AND GLOBAL NETWORKING. UNTIL THE WORLD AGREED UPON THESE BASIC CONCEPTS, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO MOVE FORWARD. THE NEXT GREAT STEP IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES— COMPLETELY FLUID INFORMATION AND FULLY INTEROPERATING MACHINES AND DEVICES— REQUIRES AN EQUALLY SIMPLE, FLEXIBLE, AND UNIVERSAL ABSTRACTION SCHEMA THAT WILL MAKE INFORMATION ITSELF TRULY PORTABLE IN BOTH PHYSICAL AND VIRTUAL SPACE, AND AMONG ANY CONCEIVABLE INFORMATION DEVICES AND SYSTEMS. FOR THE INTERNET OF THINGS TO REALLY TAKE OFF, RADICAL NEW THINKING ABOUT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MUST BEGIN AT THE MOST BASIC LEVELS, WITH NEW CONCEPTIONS ABOUT HOW DEVICES, INFORMATION, PEOPLE AND SYSTEMS WILL INTERACT.
  • 3. 3 smart systems manifesto white paper TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 Introduction 7 Designing The Future of Information 9 What’s Required? 11 Enabling Universal Connectivity 12 Automating Design and Development 15 Achieving Truly Flexible, Scalable Systems 17 Leveraging Collective Intelligence 19 Smart Systems Impact On Evolving Business Models 21 How Should We View Future Smart Systems Architecture? 23 Smart Systems Is A Radical Departure From Current Thinking 24 Getting There First; But To Where? THE SMART SYSTEMS MANIFESTO
  • 4. 4 smart systems manifesto white paper For quite a few years now, Harbor Research has focused most of its research and consult- ing on what we call “Smart Systems”—the convergence of pervasive or embedded computing with the packet-switching “network of networks” called the Internet. These days, many people refer to this phe- nomenon as “the Internet of Things.” We prefer “Smart Systems” over other terms in common use—notably “M2M,” which usu- ally stands for “machine-to-machine”—be- cause it captures the profound enormity of the phenomenon - something much greater in scope than just machine connectivity. Whatever we chose to call it -- “Smart Systems” or “Pervasive Computing” or “The Internet of Things” — we are referring to digital microprocessors and sensors em- bedded in everyday objects. But even this makes too many assumptions about what the smart systems phenomenon will be. Encoded information in physical objects is also smart—even without intrinsic comput- ing ability. Seen in this way, a printed bar code, a house key, or even the pages of a technical manual can have the status of an “information device” on a network. For that matter, all of these characterizations do not even begin to address the human- machine dimension of collaboration. But very few people are thinking about smart connected systems on that level. Current IT and telecom technologists are operating with outdated models of data, networking and information management that were conceived in the mainframe and client-server eras and cannot serve the needs of a truly connected world. “Smart Systems” should automatically be understood as “real-time networked in- formation and computation,” but it isn’t. We have now entered the age when ev- eryday objects will communicate with, and control, other objects over a global data network—24/7/365. It’s not “the future,” it’s now—this year, next year—and thus it is vi- tally important that business leaders under- stand this phenomenon, its effects on their business, and what they should do right now to position themselves for opportuni- ties that are literally just around the corner. Before delving into the new thinking that makes this story possible, let’s talk about why it’s necessary at all. The IT and tele- com sectors have failed to re-evaluate their relationship to advancing technol- INTRODUCTION
  • 5. 5 smart systems manifesto white paper M2M & IT technology only tell part of the story ogy and to their constituents. The busi- ness and technology paradigms to which these industries cling today are far too limiting, too cumbersome and too expen- sive to foster and sustain new growth. From a Telco perspective, today’s discussions of M2M systems focus almost exclusively on communications -- the “pipe” -- and very little on the information value. In other words, on things that look good to the car- riers. There are many popular visions about wireless monitoring and wireless control. Such as it is, wireless is a fantastic new ad- vance -- no question. But, focusing on the communication element alone as ‘first-or- der’ business value amounts to grabbing the wrong end of the technology stick. Wireless communications alone steals the limelight and potentially eclipses the real revolution -- utilizing new networking technologies and processes to liberate information from sensors and intelligent devices to leverage collective awareness and intelligence. From an IT perspective, today’s corporate IT function is a direct descendent of the company mainframe, and works on the same “batched computing” model—an archival model, yielding a historian’s per- spective. Information about events is collected, stored, queried, analyzed, and reported upon. But all after the fact. That’s a very different thing from feed- ing the real-time inputs of billions of tiny “state machines” into systems that con- tinually compare machine-state to sets of rules and then do something on that basis. In short, for connected devices to mean anything in business, the prevail- ing corporate IT model has to change. The next cycle of technology and systems development in the smart connected systems arena is supposed to be setting the stage for a multi-year wave of growth based on the convergence of innovations in software architectures; back-room data center operations; wireless and broadband communications; and smaller, more power- ful client devices connected to personal, local and wide-area networks. But is it?
  • 6. 6 smart systems manifesto white paper This paper is about an important new perspective on smart systems and services. This perspective does not just come from our own thinking. It is from the diverse group of people who are thinking about the scope and on the scale that Smart Systems deserves. It is because this community of technologists and business developers is so fragmented that we believe a new ap- proach is required. This is why we believe a new “manifesto” is required to begin to integrate and bind these disparate views of the future of information technology. What do we plan to address in this Smart Systems Manifesto? »» the required architecture and tech- nologies to inform a radically new view of information services; and, »» the corresponding emerging business models these technologies will inform. Most importantly, we plan to demonstrate that for the first time in the evolution of networked businesses, these two “architec- tures” must be viewed in close proximity. The two thrusts need to be mutually sup- portive without inhibiting one or the other. However, trying to coordinate and leverage the respective roles of technology architec- ture and business architecture often creates contention. Many of the participants in this emerging arena we speak with are coming to see the continuously evolving relation- ship between these two dimensions as fertile ground for innovation. They need to be interwoven and mutually supportive. In fact, from our own direct consulting experi- ences, we believe success in either increas- ingly goes to the company that effectively utilizes the combined potential of both. In our years of work on the Internet of Things phenomenon and its real-world effects on business, we have not encountered very many compelling visions about the com- plete integration of things, people, systems and real-time real-world inputs. The world today, for the most part, lacks a group of coordinated innovators that understand that the tools we are working with to make prod- ucts “smart” on networks were not designed to handle the scope and diversity of interac- tions they are being enabled to accomplish. WHY DO WE NEED A MANIFESTO?
  • 7. 7 smart systems manifesto white paper Since the beginning of computing there have essentially been three generations of technology and architecture: mainframe computing, personal computing, and network computing. Each generation of technology has had significant impacts on productivity and efficiencies: mainframes standardized transactions; personal comput- ing placed processing power into the hands of professionals; and, networked systems enabled business process automation. What is important about the next gen- eration of smart systems is the combined impact of these legacy cycles of innovation. While there is standalone value in each discipline - embedded software, servers, network infrastructure, and client devices - it is the combination of these innova- tions that will inform smarter systems. “Smart Connected Systems” really means the future of information, and that means the future of civilization. It will require a remark- ably agile global network that could com- fortably scale to trillions of nodes—some of them hardware, some software, some purely data, many of them coming into and out of existence or changing location constantly. Obviously, such a network system cannot be “designed” in any ordinary sense. Cer- tainly, it cannot be designed “top-down.” And yet the Internet of Things must be designed in some sense. Such a net- work will easily be the biggest technical achievement in the history of human- ity. Its closest predecessor is the global financial economy—with which, in fact, it will share vital characteristics. Some basic design principles must be put in place to guide the growth of a vast, distributed technological organism that must remain organized as it evolves according to a logic all its own. It de- mands that we design not only devices and networks but also information itself in ways not addressed by current IT. The Internet of Interactions -- between and among “Things” and “People” -- re- quires much more than simple incremental improvements in today’s technologies to be fully realized. The challenge is much more than a simple patch, Band-Aid, or new flavor of what we already do. can the internet of things be designed? Designing The Future of Information
  • 8. 8 smart systems manifesto white paper What’s required is a true shift in thinking about how devices, people and physical systems will be integrated and how they will interact. We need an approach that is not about leveraging aging IT technology into a new application context; its about look- ing forward to a single, unified architecture for the nearly infinite interactions to which any PERSON or any THING can contribute. What will this require? »» Its about the ability to create more universal standards for connectivity and integration; one simple standard, based upon the Internet Protocol itself for networking any information device (even non-electronic ones), rather than the multiplicity of so- called standards we have today. »» A vision that looks toward the creation of more universal means to integrate and manage disparate data, to which anyone can contribute, and which liberates information by abandoning traditional relational databasing and the client-server computing models that have us so deceptively ”trapped” today. simple incremental improvements in today’s technologies will not work for the internet of things These broader requirements are driving several important devel- opment trends, including: »» The rapidly rising requirements for smart products to be interoper- able with a growing array of ap- plications, systems and people. »» End customers are beginning to recog- nize the requirement for a unified family of software and tools to develop smart connected devices; today’s diverse soft- ware offerings and fragmented supplier community will not meet their needs. »» The need for new development pro- tocols to address the growing com- plexity of new devices and systems. »» The ability to aggregate, fuse and manage structured, unstruc- tured and time series data. »» The maturation of radically new in- formation models and architectures that can more readily integrate clas- sical IT capabilities with real-time, state-based devices and systems.
  • 9. 9 smart systems manifesto white paper Taking these initiatives seriously does not mean junking all current IT practice in one fell swoop. The pillars of present-day infor- mation technology will not crumble over- night, nor has the great existing investment in them suddenly lost all value. There are reasonable, fiscally sane paths for migrat- ing to the future. But migrate we must. The assumptions and practices of the main- frame and PC eras are now decades old and not suitable for the pervasive computing era that informs the internet of things and people. The nature and behavior of a truly distributed global information system are concerns that have yet to really take center stage—not only in business communities, but in most technology communities, too. When it comes to preparing for the global information economy of the 21st century, most people assume that “the IT and telco technologists are taking care of it.” They take it on faith that the best possible designs for the future of connected things, people, systems and information will emerge from large corporations and centralized authori- ties. But those are big, unfounded assump- tions. In fact, most of today’s entrenched players are showing little appetite for radical departures from current practice. Yet cur- rent practice will not serve the needs of a genuinely connected world. What are the major obstacles that need to be overcome? Automated Development: When tele- phones first came into existence, all calls were routed through switchboards and had to be connected by a live operator. It was long ago forecast that if telephone traffic continued to grow in this way, soon everybody in the world would have to be a switchboard opera- tor. Of course that has not happened, be- cause automation was built into the systems to handle common tasks like connecting calls. We are quickly approaching analogous circumstances with the proliferation of smart connected devices. Each new device requires too much customization and maintenance just to perform the same basic tasks. We must develop software and methods to automate development and facilitate re-use, or risk constraining the growth of this market. the assumptions and practices of the mainframe and PC eras are now decades old and not suitable for the pervasive and smart computing era What’s Required?
  • 10. 10 smart systems manifesto white paper Flexible, Scalable Systems: IT profession- als rarely talk these days about the need for ever-evolving information services that can be made available anywhere, anytime, for any kind of information. Instead, they talk about web services, enterprise apps and now cloud computing. The Web stores information in one of two basic ways: utterly unstructured, or far too rigidly structured. The unstructured way gives us typical static Web pages, blog postings, etc., in which the basic unit of information is large, free-form, and lacking any fundamental identity. The overly structured way involves the use of relational database tables that impose rigid, pre-ordained schemas on stored informa- tion. These schemas, designed by database administrators in advance, are not at all agile or easily extensible. Making even trivial changes to these schemas is a cumbersome, expensive process that affects all the data inside them. Just as importantly, they make deep, inflexible assumptions about the mean- ing and context of the data they store. Both of these approaches to data-structure enforce severe limitations on the functions you want most in a global, pervasive-era information system: scalability, interoperability and seam- less integration of real-time or event-driven data. The client-server model underlying the Web greatly compounds the problem. Optimizing All Assets - Tangible And In- tangible: New software technologies and applications need to help organizations address the key challenge of optimizing the value of their balance sheets, allowing them to move beyond just financial assets and liabilities to their physical assets and liabilities (like electric grids or hospitals) and then to their intangible assets and li- abilities (like a skilled workforce). The task of optimizing the value of financial assets, physical assets and people assets requires new technologies that will integrate diverse asset information in unprecedented ways to solve more complex business problems. Leveraging Collective Intelligence: For all its sophistication, many of today’s M2M systems are a direct descendent of the tradi- tional cellular telephony model where each device acts in a “hub and spoke” mode. The inability of today’s popular enterprise systems to interoperate and perform well with distrib- uted heterogeneous device environments is a significant obstacle. The many “nodes” of a network may not be very “smart” in them- selves, but if they are networked in a way today’s M2M systems are a descendent of the traditional cellular telephony model
  • 11. 11 smart systems manifesto white paper that allows them to connect effortlessly and interoperate seamlessly, they begin to give rise to complex, system-wide behavior. This allows an entirely new order of intelligence to emerge from the system as a whole—an in- telligence that could not have been predicted by looking at any of the nodes individually. What’s required is to shift the focus from simple device monitoring to a model where device data is aggregated into new applica- tions to achieve true systems intelligence. Smart Systems holds the potential for what Harbor Research calls “the network- ing of every manufactured thing.” but it also presupposes the existence of “a zero- infrastructure, ad-hoc network” that makes seamless physical connection possible. How will the physical aspects of this net- working actually take place? How will virtually any device, right down to a lowly light bulb, become a peer that connects at will to the global data network? we don’t need many standards; we want one Obviously, billions of devices of wildly varying types cannot each receive indi- vidual attention and configuration, or conform to elaborate a priori specifica- tions. If it literally takes a network engineer to screw in a smart light bulb, pervasive computing is never going to work. Many schemes and so-called “stan- dards” for device connectivity already exist. But of course, all those “solutions” add up to one big problem. We don’t want many standards; we want one. Of course, an elegant answer is offered by IP which is predicated upon the idea that we already have an excellent way to get every conceivable device on the Internet—the original design principles and protocols of the Internet itself. “Internet” is short for “internetworking.” The Internet was designed in the 1960s to allow the incompatible data networks and com- puting systems of the time to share informa- tion—to “talk to each other,” as people like to say. The Internet is literally a “network of networks.” That’s what the “inter” means. Enabling Universal Connectivity
  • 12. 12 smart systems manifesto white paper The public Internet as we know it today is a worldwide embodiment of those original data communications protocols—which are, by design, extremely simple. For this discus- sion, their key attribute is that they make very few assumptions about the data they are sending and about the devices connecting to the network to send and receive data. It is this extensible, technology-neutral basis of the Internet that has allowed it to scale so dramatically (and gracefully) since its incep- tion, with minimal central administration. There have been previous high profile examples of industries trying to create niche standards for special purpose networks only to eventually evolve to open IP standards years later. This circumstance is typified by the evolution of fieldbus networks in the industrial arena in the 1990s and early part of this decade. Several larger players slowed down their own developments, plowed bil- lions of dollars into supporting closed and then ‘pseudo open’ standards and fought over the spoils for nearly 20 years only to find the market eventually came to under- stand the benefits of open IP based network standards. We see no reason that this lesson from history shouldn’t be applied now. Looking forward, Harbor Research believes there is a major opportunity for select mar- ket participants to act as an ‘IoT architect or catalyst’ and harmonize the network standards for short range WLAN and WSN applications around an existing, new or adapted suite of interoperable standards. Our society is at the cusp of a “perfect storm” of network connectivity. This phenomenon is not just about the dichotomy between people communicating with people or ma- chines communicating with machines: it also includes people communicating with ma- chines (e.g. a networked ATM), and machines communicating with people (e.g. automated stock ticker alerts on your smartphone). The concept of network effects states that the val- ue of a network grows exponentially with the number of nodes connected to it. Along with the value, however, so too grows the com- plexity of the software integrated into devices and the reliance on people and organizations developing and supporting these systems. we are at the cusp of a perfect storm Automating Design and Development
  • 13. 13 smart systems manifesto white paper With the rapid growth of wireless networks, connecting these devices to the Internet has never been easier. The growth of devices on the Internet today is chiefly occurring in two distinct ways. The first is that previ- ously separate networks – such as video, voice, cellular, etc., - are all migrating toward shared IP. This trend requires the Internet to absorb wholesale transitions of full-scale networks into its existing framework. At the same time, new classes of devices are becoming network enabled. The types of devices being connected today extend far beyond the laptops and cell phones we have become so accustomed to. Today, virtually all products that use electricity - from toys and coffee makers to cars and medical diagnostic machines - possess inherent data processing capability and the potential to be networked. The fact that a rapidly expanding range of devices have the capability to automatically transmit information about status, perfor- mance and usage and can interact with people and other devices anywhere in real time points to the increasing complexity of these devices. For example, software for the average mobile phone contains over 10 million lines of code. Over the last five years, software in automobiles has grown from an average of 35 million lines of code to over 100 million. The astronomical growth of features and functions within and among connected devices pushes the bounds of what designers of software for products ever had in mind. Some basic design principles must be put in place to guide the development of smart connected devices. It demands that we design not only devices and networks but also information management systems in ways not addressed by current IT technolo- gies. The reader may ask, don’t we already have a vast number of software products to address these challenges? Don’t we have real-time operating systems and develop- ment tools? And aren’t these technologies working together today quite handsomely? Almost everyone will answer with a re- sounding “Yes!” But consider this analogy from Buckminster Fuller: Suppose you are traveling on an ocean liner that suddenly begins to sink. If you rip the lid off the grand piano in the ballroom, throw it overboard, and jump on it, the floating piano lid may well save your life. But if, under normal circumstances, you set about to design the some basic design principles must be put in place to guide the development of smart devices
  • 14. 14 smart systems manifesto white paper best possible life preserver, are you going to come up with the lid of a grand piano? The growing scale of interactions between feature-rich devices and the antiquated tools available today to develop them are like that piano lid. In a period of great change and tumult, it worked—in the sense that it kept us afloat. But that does not make it the best possible design, or qualify it to be something that we should plan to live with forever. The tools we are working with today to make products “smart” were not designed to han- dle the scope of new capabilities, the diversity of devices and the massive volume of data- points generated from device interactions. These challenges are diluting the ability of engineering organizations to efficiently and effectively manage development. The frag- mented nature of software offerings available today make it extremely difficult, if not im- possible, to leverage design and engineering work across different platforms and devices. What is needed is a common means of development that can leverage tools, tasks and code across families of interrelated devices. Customers expect evolving soft- ware tools to be functional, ubiquitous, and easy-to-use. Within this construct, however, the first two expectations run counter to the third. In order to achieve all three, a new ap- proach is required -- a unified development framework for smart connected devices. What would this entail: »» Software tools and development pro- tocols that work together seamlessly, securely and safely across diverse de- vices - historically sofware development has been very distinct for different types of products such as computers, phones and other intelligent [non-IT] equipment - in the future diverse device segments will be served by increas- ingly common software and tools. »» Software that supports interoperability over long product life cycles - the abil- ity to support products for 15-20 year life cycles and bridge complete tech- nology shifts will be required. Devices will require multiple code upgrades to remain compatible and interoperable. »» Software and development tools to address a broad range of application technology does not have to breed complexity
  • 15. 15 smart systems manifesto white paper requirements - increasingly, product man- ufacturers will need to develop both GUI- based/data centric applications as well as low end “headless” non-GUI-based systems where boot loaders, schedulers, comms stacks and other OS components are used. OEMs need a single unified framework to design and build solu- tions that can be certified to interoperate across all the uP and OS classes they use. »» Software and tools that leverage re-use - given the scale of the Internet of Things it will simply not be humanly possible to write all the code required without large scale re-use - the ability, for ex- ample, to develop a security module or comms stack that can be designed and certified once but used multiple times. We are reaching a critical juncture in mar- ket development where engineering or- ganizations will soon be crying out for a completely new approach - one where the operating system and its components can be utilized again and again across an ever broader spectrum of devices. We must develop software and methods to automate development and facilitate re-use, or risk constraining the growth of this market. IT professionals talk these days about the need for ever-evolving information services that can be made available any- where, anytime, for any kind of informa- tion. Most of this talk surrounds the advent of cloud computing and services. All too often, IT people speak about cloud and web services with “the Internet” inter- changeably without giving it a thought. But the Web is not the Internet. The Internet itself is a simple, elegant, extensible, scalable, technology-neutral networking system that will do exactly what it was designed to do for the indefinite future. The same cannot be said of the Web, which is essentially an ap- plication running on top of the Internet. It is hardly the only possible Internet application, nor is it the most profound one conceivable. The Web’s Achilles heel does not originate in its browsing software, or markup lan- guages, or the other superficial aspects that most users touch directly. Those in- ventions are not necessarily ideal, but they are useful enough today, and they can be we are reaching a critical juncture where organizations will soon be crying out for a completely new approach Achieving Truly Flexible, Scalable Systems
  • 16. 16 smart systems manifesto white paper replaced over time with better alternatives. Rather, the Web’s weakness lies with its basic enabling technologies—in particular, relational databasing and the client-server model—and the restrictions they place upon structuring, storing, and retrieving data. The Web, and now cloud services, stores information in one of two basic ways: utterly unstructured, or far too rigidly structured. The unstructured way gives us typical static Web pages, blog postings, etc., in which the basic unit of information is large, free-form, and lacking any fundamental identity. The overly structured way involves the use of relational database tables that impose rigid, pre-ordained schemas on stored informa- tion. These schemas, designed by database administrators in advance, are not at all agile or easily extensible. Making even trivial changes to these schemas is a cumbersome, expensive process that affects all the data inside them. Just as importantly, they make deep, inflexible assumptions about the mean- ing and context of the data they store. Both of these approaches to data-structure enforce severe limitations on the two things you want most in a global, pervasive-era information system: scalability and interoperability. The client-server model underlying the Web greatly compounds the problem. Regardless of data-structure, when you put information on the Web you put it in a specific physi- cal location—i.e., you upload your HTML or middleware files, or your database tables, to a specific directory on a specific server. Thus, a Web URL does not point to information per se; it points to the information’s physi- cal location, which is a very different thing. This means that the Web is machine-centric, not information-centric. Information on the Web is not free to move, and because its life is tied to the life of a physical machine, informa- tion on the Web can easily become extinct. If a particular server goes offline, temporar- ily or forever, all its URLs are dead and the information is unavailable. You can “mirror” your data so that copies reside on multiple servers, but this does not change the fact that Web-based information is always tethered to specific locations on specific machines. All of this adds up to a huge collection of information-islands called the World Wide Web. Assuming the islands remain in exis- tence reliably, they are still fundamentally incapable of truly interoperating with other information-islands. We can create bridges today’s cloud and IT world are still disconnected islands
  • 17. 17 smart systems manifesto white paper between them, but islands they remain. That’s what they were designed to be. The latest bridges are called “cloud broker- ing services,” by which islands automati- cally “feed” information to each other. In terms of convenience for human beings, Web services are a distinct advance over manually navigating Web pages. You can now set up a browser page or a desktop applet to “consume” (receive and display) a Web-feed of news headlines, stock quotes, weather information, package tracking, and so on. And that’s a good thing—a pleas- ant, time-saving, incremental improve- ment on yesterday’s way of doing things. But many people talk about Web and cloud services as “the next big thing,” and if that’s true we can only say: We were hoping for something bigger. Con- suming a cloud service is exactly the same thing as loading a Web page. All of these new services are still prey to the client-server rigidity and vulnerability we’ve described, making them particularly unsuit- able for vital public information services. And in order to concatenate information from diverse sources, these services depend upon data-tagging conventions that require yet more layers of prior agreement, schemas, markup, and manual human administration. With each additional layer of such engineer- ing and administration, the Web comes closer and closer to resembling a fantasti- cally jury-rigged Rube Goldberg contraption. The reason is simple. These new comput- ing schemes were not designed for a world driven by pervasive information flow. In today’s world, information is not free (and that’s free as in “freedom,” not free as in “free of charge”). In fact, thanks to present infor- mation architectures, it’s not free to easily merge with other information and enable any kind of search-based intelligence. What would truly liberated information be like? It might help to think of the atoms and molecules of the physical world. They have distinct identities, of course, but they are also capable of bonding with other what would truly liberated information be like? Leveraging Collective Intelligence
  • 18. 18 smart systems manifesto white paper The traditional approaches to data discovery and systems intelligence have two failings: they can’t provide a holistic view of these diverse data types and, the types of intelligence tools available to users are, at best, arcane and typically limited in use to “specialists.” Users need new ways to find informa- tion and discover patterns on their own, without requiring specialists or IT sup- port. This allows users to determine where deeper analytics or the creation of an ad hoc business process can add value. Given the immature state of today’s real-world systems, most people have trouble grasping the power and importance these capabilities enable. The ability to detect patterns in data is the holy grail of smart systems and The Internet of Things because it allows not only patterns but a whole higher order of intelligence to emerge from large collections of ordinary data. The implications are obviously immense. We need an entirely new approach that avoids the confinements and limitations of the today’s differing data types and tools. It allows data to maintain their fundamental identity while bonding freely with other data. Facilitating discovery, based on data and information accessibility, fusion and cumula- atoms and molecules to create entirely dif- ferent kinds of matter. Often this bonding requires special circumstances, such as ex- treme heat or pressure, but not always. In the world of information, such bonding is not all that easy. Today’s software platforms focus on execution processes that generate one of three types of data - unstructured, transactional or time series. For each of these data types, a specific set of intelligence tools have evolved to provide “insight” but, in most cases, these tools limit the questions that can be answered to those known in advance. So for a user attempting to do something as simple as asking a certain multi-dimensional ques- tion, creating new information from multiple data types that is an easily perceivable, ma- nipulable, or mappable “model” of the answer to that question is a significant challenge. The Internet of Things requires new platforms to fundamentally changes this paradigm, treating data from things, people, systems and the physical world as augmented repre- sentations. In other words, treating diverse data types equally. This enables processes connecting diverse data in any combina- tion to be rapidly built and deployed. traditional approaches to systems intelligence won’t work in the smart sytems world
  • 19. 19 smart systems manifesto white paper tive systems intelligence, is a fundamental goal for information systems. The world needs systems designed for a genuinely connected world in which there are no artificial barriers between pieces and types of information. Smart connected devices are a global and economic phenomenon of unprec- edented scale - potentially billions if not trillions of nodes will be connected if the right technology and business architec- tures are in place. Today the relationship between the evolving technologies driv- ing the Internet of Things and the business models that these systems could inform is “disconnected” and problematic at best. Apple and some of its peers in consumer space present an interesting case for how Smart Business models are developing. Apple is primarily a consumer-focused tech ven- dor, with no need for the vertical industry capabilities required in B2B applications. Still, Apple provides a model for creating a Smart System solution that pulls together technologies from multiple domains and packages that solution in a way that wins buyer acceptance. Looking beyond Apple to Google, Amazon, Facebook and other play- ers coming from their roots in the evolving consumer mobile internet arena, there are a variety of new business models emerging from cloud and related services platform players that are the embodiment of Smart Systems. Add to this the momentum from these players are creating via collaboration with their app communities -- Amazon has over 100,000 developers building applica- tions and businesses; Apple’s App Store has created a phenomenal lead position -- they are all driving entirely new forms of col- laboration and peer product development. The traditional notion of M2M applica- tions has largely grown up in a B2B context -- equipment manufacturers developing remote services and support automation tied closely to their equipment services contracts. These models are focused almost exclusively on customer support and automation -- not on new Smart Services value beyond sup- port. As these two classes of business models inch closer to each other in the marketplace it is increasingly evident that consumer smart Smart Systems Impact On Evolving Business Models new business models and new business design practices are required to realize the potential
  • 20. 20 smart systems manifesto white paper business models provide many lessons for the “cloistered” equipment manufacturers in B2B arenas. The business benefits of large scale collaboration and social networking tools in the B2B arena are finally being recognized. Executives in many product manufactur- ing companies are only just beginning to understand the opportunities driven by the complicity between collabora- tion tools, networked device intelligence and service business design and it is this set of relationships, not the techno- logical shift, that will benefit but also chal- lenge many product manufacturers. What product manufacturers looking to- leverage collaboration or benefit from connecting “smart products” to the In- ternet need to understand is we have en- tered a phase in the marketplace where ideas can emerge from anywhere in the world; new network and IT tools have dramatically reduced the cost of utilizing them. The bottom line: no single company should look to innovate on their own. Collaborative communities both inform and express the strategy. Built to pursue multiple aims simultaneously, a dynamic network of connected products and people drive new information values which, in turn, create new influences in the marketplace. Power in human and device collaboration structures falls to those who best under- stand how to use this information and influence to get and keep a key position. Forging collaborative communities means managing uncertainty. A product OEM needs a clear understanding of the forces at work between and among devices and people. They must try to identify those few “interactions” that make a difference. From this understanding provided via real time interactions, early indicators of the true direction of customer needs and behaviors can be understood long before others. we are just beginning to understand the opportunities driven by the complicity between collaboration tools, networked device intelligence and service business design
  • 21. 21 smart systems manifesto white paper Some things that look easy turn out to be hard. That’s part of the strange saga of the Internet of Things and its perpetual attempts to get itself off the ground. But some things that should be kept simple are allowed to get unnecessarily complex, and that’s the other part of the story. The drive to develop technology can inspire grandiose visions that make simple thinking seem somehow embarrassing or not worthwhile. That’s not a good thing when defining and deploying real-world technology to deliver innovation. This is where the new values of a true smart systems architecture really come into focus. We’ve articulated a “smart systems” vision and road map that empha- sizes several points, including: »» The architecture required to inform an Internet of Things looks nothing like today’s kludge diagrams of smart devices connected to clouds; it will inevitably evolve to a radically dif- ferent peer-to-peer architecture. »» As the architecture evolves, the defini- tions of its most basic elements that everyone is so anxious to quan- tify today (servers, devices, routers, hubs, etc.) will change radically. »» What most people who do not under- stand this evolution are missing is that you cannot accurately quantify the future state of the Internet of Things by merely counting today’s mess of architecture and systems elements. Today the world of smart communicating devices is mostly organized in hierarchies with smart user interface devices at the top and the dumb devices [often analog or serial sensors and actuators] at the bot- tom. Within this structure, there are typically various types of “middle box” supervisory devices forming a point of connectivity and control for the sensors and actuators as well as the infrastructure for the network. From our perspective, this description of today’s M2M, remote services and connected sys- tems architectures looks very familiar and is largely organized much like client-server based computer systems….. no surprise given they were designed in the 1980’s. How Should We View Future Smart Systems Architecture?
  • 22. 22 smart systems manifesto white paper As the Internet of Things opportunity ex- pands, the sensor and actuator devices will all become smart themselves and the con- nectivity between them (devices, for the most part, that have never been connected) will become more and more complex. As the numbers of smart devices grow, the exist- ing client-server hierarchy and the related “middle boxes” acting as hubs, controllers and interfaces will quickly start to blur. In this future-state, the need for any kind of tradi- tional client-server architecture will become superfluous. In a future Internet of Things, the days of hierarchical models are numbered. Now, imagine a future smart systems world where sensors and devices that were once connected by twisted pair, current loops or were hardwired become networked with all devices integrated onto one IP-based net- work (wired or wireless). In this new world, the “middle boxes” don’t need traditional input/output (I/O) hardware or interfaces. They begin to look just like network com- puters running applications designed to interact with peer devices and carry out functions with their “herd” or “clusters” of smart sensors and devices – let’s call these new middle boxes, “aggregators”. We can readily imagine an application environment where there may be several aggregators running applications which overlap sharing their sensors and actua- tors, some even ‘sharing’ a whole herd – a smart building application, for example, where the processor in an occupancy sen- sor is used to turn the lights on, change the heating or cooling profile or alert security. In this evolving architecture, the network essentially flattens until the end-point devices are merely peers and a variety of applications reside on one or more net- work controllers which look for all intents and purposes like today’s cellular router/ modems, industrial PCs or small “head- less” high availability distributed servers. In a smart systems application world de- signed to capture, log and analyze large vol- umes of data from sensors, the aggregators, such as we are describing here, will carry out the process of taking raw data and distilling it into information “locally.” Local processing is required to reduce the otherwise untenable Internet traffic challenges that arise from con- necting billions of devices. The notion that all these “things” and devices will produce streaming data that has to be processed in some cloud will simply not work. It makes the notion that all these“things”and devices will produce streaming data that has to be processed in some cloud will simply not work
  • 23. 23 smart systems manifesto white paper more sense structurally and economically to execute these interactions in a more distrib- uted architecture near the sensors and actua- tors where the application-context prevails. This is the move we’ve all been waiting for to a truly distributed architecture because today’s systems will not be able to scale and interact effectively where there are billions of nodes involved. In this portrayal, the aggre- gators will become peers in a network along with the sensors, actuators and controllers whether or not they have GUIs (headed) or not (headless). The aggregators will also become unified application platforms from which to provide services to devices and users where the applications run, where the data is turned into information, where storage takes place, and where the brows- ing of information ultimately takes place too – not in some server farm in a cloud data center. Even the mobile handsets we admire so much today are but a tiny class of user interface and communications devices in an Internet of Things world where there will be 100 times more “things” than humans. In this future Smart Systems arena, the architecture and relationship structures between and among smart devices will be- come more or less flat. Hierarchy will disap- pear. Peer-to-peer will become the “norm” for interactions (with its attendant benefits and pitfalls). From our view the movement towards peer-to-peer, and the view that many people hold that this is somehow novel, is ironic given that the Internet was originally designed for peer-to-peer interactions. This is a vast opportunity of untold scale. If we hypothesize that there will be 2-5 “headed” user interface devices for every person on the planet – say 12-30 billion in the future. Of these, if 4-5 billion will be por- table and/or low power, there will likely be 30-40 billion controller/aggregator devices, potentially managing around 60-100 billion end-point sensor/actuator devices – a ratio of 20:1 or so…and that’s just the relatively Smart Systems Is A Radical Departure From Current Thinking
  • 24. 24 smart systems manifesto white paper near term. When you think there are only 1 billion PCs on the planet and 3 billion cell phones, this all starts to come into focus and in many ways, aggregators will be the next “PC”…but with 30X more of them. Today we can only see the beginnings of this structurally: Industrial PC’s, communica- tions hubs and all manner of gateway-like boxes all morphing to aggregators with handsets and tablets morphing to universal user interface devices. In this vision all we can hear in the today’s marketplace is the siren song of client-server and Cloud stories. In our years of experience, we have all too often seen the unfortunate scenarios that managers create when uncertainty and complexity force them to rely on selective attention. Unfortunately, when this hap- pens, selective attention naturally gravitates toward what’s readily available: past experi- ence and uncertain assumptions. Today’s IT and telco infrastructure players are doing just this. By ignoring important trends simply because it’s difficult to perceive an alternative future, these managers are certainly leaving the door open for competition that will lead to their eventual obsolescence…which will make for a very interesting world to live in… Though their business models are inter- mingling today, all of the major categories of suppliers in the “traditional” so-called M2M software arena have historically oper- ated within well-established assumptions about product scope and business models. No one would characterize the existing players of being technology or business model innovators or disruptive in nature. Radical new thinking about information tech- nology must begin at the most basic levels, with new conceptions about the interactions of information with people, systems and devices. We think more about future proof- ing innovations by making the fewest pos- sible assumptions about the nature of net- worked objects and the data they produce, carry or process - we need a much broader, all-encompassing view of information. Ultimately, this type of smart systems archi- tecture will alter traditional business models and how new applications are realized. Since all of this that we are describing is a radical departure from current offerings and business practices, and is driven by a very Getting There First; But To Where?
  • 25. 25 smart systems manifesto white paper unique set of needs, it stands to reason that these types of solutions do not fall within the narrow specialties of the existing players. In fact, the architecture being described is prob- ably best viewed as an entirely new market category. This is particularly true given the disjointed patchwork of solutions presently in place and the apparent lack of vision from existing players of what’s required in the future. The opportunity to lead in developing and shaping this market looks wide open. ABOUT HARBOR RESEARCH Founded in 1984, Harbor Research Inc. has more than twenty five years of experience in providing strategic consulting and research services that enable our clients to understand and capitalize on emergent and disruptive op- portunities driven by information and commu- nications technology. The firm has established a unique competence in developing business models and strategy for the convergence of pervasive computing, global networking and smart systems.