Review of the development of the Army 3Rs Explosive Safety Program and the tools available to public affairs personnel, safety officials, and contractors.
4. I Thought …
Building my house of
ammunition crates
was a good idea.
It was a good idea
until my wife
wanted to use the The new owner wants
couch. to make sure they’re
all empty?
5. What is the Need?
• Munitions can be encountered anywhere
(current and past use, war souvenirs)
• Most accidents result from handling or
disturbing munitions when encountered
• DoD continues to use some lands for live‐fire
training and testing
• DoD restructuring (past, present, future) means
lands once used for munitions‐related activities
are being or will be used for other purposes
6. What is the Need?
• Addressing munitions present on these lands
(called, munitions response sites, or MRS)
will take decades, given current funding levels
• Even with cleanup, cannot assure 100% of
munitions present have been recovered
• Controlling access to operational ranges
remains difficult
• People will continue to encounter munitions
• Education is a good first step in managing risk
7.
8. Outreach Efforts
• Seminal event in developing 3Rs program
• Basic tenants of the program
• Getting the message out
• Local needs vary
• Changes in safety signs
• Future efforts
9. Tierrasanta, California
• Camp Elliott:
– Closed in 1960, with most property sold by 1974
– December 1983
• Two boys who found a 37mm near their homes were
killed when the munition detonated after being disturb
• Formerly Used Defense Site Program established
• 1984 ‐ 1985 Formal public awareness
campaign launched in California
– Provided information at schools
– Graduates of program returned about 17 years
later and give the program to students
10. Wiggins, Mississippi
• March 2000, Camp Shelby’s operational range:
teenagers entered range impact area and
removed several UXO
• May 2000, UXO being handled detonated,
presumably when dropped
– One teenager killed, one critically injured
– Vehicles and home damaged
– Witnesses indicated up to 20 children had been
playing with munitions
– Other UXO recovered
11. Tragedy
• Parents knew their children were going on the
installation, but did not know to warn them
• Parent claimed range where munitions were
recovered was poorly marked
• Teenagers:
– Initially wedged several munitions under tires to
get car out of the mud
– Took the munitions home as souvenirs
• Teens that were hurt were NOT the ones that took
the munitions home
12. Post Camp Shelby
• Incident caught attention of Army’s Chief of
Munitions G‐4 and DASA(ESOH)
• Outreach efforts, at the time, were:
– Focused on property type
– Varied by organization, Service‐‐USACE Districts
independently developed similar, but different programs
• New approach
– Origin of munitions and location is irrelevant
– Munitions are dangerous
– Consistent , easy to remember message
needed
14. Developing the 3Rs Message
• Army developed with the intention that DoD
would adopt
• Collected and reviewed all existing outreach
material ‐ rejected blood and gore
• Identify and eliminate mixed messages
• Established Configuration Control Board
– EOD, explosives safety, risk communication,
educators, public affairs, parents
– Legal review of materials
15. 3Rs Message
• Recognize – when you may have encountered
a munition.
• Retreat – do not touch or disturb it, but move
carefully away, walking out the same way you
entered the area.
• Report – what you saw and where you saw it
to local law enforcement (call 911).
16. Getting the Message Out
• Age appropriate materials developed —
average reading level in USA is 8th grade
• Determine critical needs‐‐target
– Outdoor recreational activities
– Trades where munitions have
been encountered
– Souvenirs
– Locations where warnings are
needed
– Reason munitions are being encountered
• Deploy on website for ready access
19. Addressing Needs
• Type of material needed
• Designed to:
– Be used anywhere
• Cultural differences
• Multi‐lingual needs
– Address activity
• Fishing
• Construction
• Recreation
– Consider how communities learn
• Media
• Elders
• Clergy
20.
21. 3Rs Campaigns
• Commercial fishing industry
• Construction industry – especially on former
and active military installations
• Veterans and returning soldiers
• Recreational activities (e.g., SCUBA divers)
• Residents near operational ranges or an MRS,
particularly active response actions
• Chemical agent identification sets
31. Concerns with Current Signs
• Inconsistent format
• Heavily dependant on
literacy, issues with
‐ Non‐English speakers
‐ Children
• Often follow obsolete
requirements
• Unfamiliar words
• May not be visible at
distance
34. Existing Standards
Not Specific Enough
• ISO explosion symbol
• UN International
Mine Action versions
35. Standards Applicable to Signs
• American National Standards Institute
(ANSI), American National Standard for
Environmental and Facility Safety Signs
(ANSI Z535.2‐2007)
• International Organization for
Standardization's (ISO) Graphical symbols
‐ Safety colours and safety signs (ISO
3864)
• ANSI harmonized its standard with ISO in
2007
37. ANSI Standard
• Safety symbol panel communicates:
‐ Hazard information across language and literacy barriers
‐ Ideally identifies hazard and avoidance
• Message panel communicates:
‐ Identification of the hazard
‐ How to avoid the hazard
‐ Probable consequences of not avoiding the hazard
38. ANSI Compliant Proposal
Signal word panel
Safety symbol panel
Message panel
Comments:
• Position bomb, as if it was on
the ground
• Dislike avoidance symbol
39. Contact
Geoff Carton
CALIBRE Systems
Geoff.Carton@calibresys.com