Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.

Proctor And Gamble

173.263 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

MBA Strategic Management Individual project on Procter & Gamble. I performed a strategic situation analysis of both internal and external factors for the purpose of value creation through strategic formulation and implementation.

  • What are the best natural remedies for hair loss? ➤➤ https://bit.ly/2N8ZrEt
       Antworten 
    Sind Sie sicher, dass Sie …  Ja  Nein
    Ihre Nachricht erscheint hier
  • How can I improve my memory book? How can I improve my memory recall? visit to learn...●●● https://bit.ly/2GEWG9T
       Antworten 
    Sind Sie sicher, dass Sie …  Ja  Nein
    Ihre Nachricht erscheint hier
  • Want to earn $4000/m? Of course you do. Learn how when you join today! ★★★ http://scamcb.com/ezpayjobs/pdf
       Antworten 
    Sind Sie sicher, dass Sie …  Ja  Nein
    Ihre Nachricht erscheint hier
  • There are over 16,000 woodworking plans that comes with step-by-step instructions and detailed photos, Click here to take a look ♥♥♥ http://tinyurl.com/y3hc8gpw
       Antworten 
    Sind Sie sicher, dass Sie …  Ja  Nein
    Ihre Nachricht erscheint hier
  • There are over 16,000 woodworking plans that comes with step-by-step instructions and detailed photos, Click here to take a look  http://tinyurl.com/yy9yh8fu
       Antworten 
    Sind Sie sicher, dass Sie …  Ja  Nein
    Ihre Nachricht erscheint hier

Proctor And Gamble

  1. 1. University of Houston-Victoria School of Business Administration Individual Project Procter and Gamble Submitted by: Frank J. Paul October 18, 2009 Seminar in Strategic Management – MGT 6359 (Section 34509) University of Houston - Victoria Fall 2009 Instructor: Dr. T. T. Selvarajan
  2. 2. Table of Contents 1.0.0 External Environmental Analysis………………………………………… 3 1.1.0 General Environmental Analysis…………………………………………… 3 1.1.1 Demographic Segment………………………………………………. 3 1.1.2. Economic Segment…………………………………………………. 6 1.1.3 Political/Legal Segment……………………………………………… 10 1.1.4 Social-Cultural Segment……………………………………………… 11 1.1.5 Technological Segment………………………………………………. 12 1.1.6 Global Segment………………………………………………………. 15 1.1.7 Summary of General Environment Analysis…………………………. 15 1.2.0 Driving Forces…………………………………………………………………. 16 1.3.0 Industry Analysis……………………………………………………………….. 19 1.3.1. Description of the Industry…………………………………………….. 19 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 2 of 87
  3. 3. 1.3.2. Industry Dominant Economic Features…………………………………. 19 1.3.3. Industry Trends…………………………………………………………. 20 1.3.4. Summary of Industry Analysis…………………………………………. 21 1.4.0 Five Forces Competitive Analysis…………………………………………..….. 22 1.4.1. Threat of New Entrants………………………………………………… 23 1.4.2. Power of Buyers……………………………………………………….. 24 1.4.3. Power of Suppliers………………………………………………………. 24 1.4.4. Threat of Substitutes…………………………………………………….. 25 1.4.5. Intensity of Rivalry………………………………………………………. 25 1.4.6. Summary of Five Forces Competitive Analysis…………………………. 26 1.5.0 Competitor Analysis………………………………………………………………. 26 1.5.1 What Market Positions Rivals Occupy……………………………………. 26 1.5.2 Strategic Group Maps of Competitors……………………………………. 27 1.5.3 Competitor’s Strategies…………………………………………………… 28 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 3 of 87
  4. 4. 1.5.4 Strengths and Weaknesses of Competitors………………………………. 30 1.5.5 Competitor’s Next Moves………………………………………………… 32 1.5.6 Competitive Advantage of the Company in Relation to the Rivals……… 32 1.5.7 Summary of Competitor Analysis……………………………………….. 33 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 4 of 87
  5. 5. 2.0.0 Internal Analysis and SWOT Analysis 2.1.0 Financial Analysis……………………………………………………………….. 34 2.1.1 Valuation Analysis……………………………………………………… 35 2.1.2 Growth Analysis………………………………………………………… 35 2.1.3 Profitability Analysis…………………………………………………… 36 2.1.4 Financial Strength Analysis…………………………………………….. 36 2.1.5 Dividend Analysis……………………………………………………… 37 2.1.6 Management Efficiency Analysis………………………………………. 37 2.1.7 Stock Price Analysis……………………………………………………. 38 2.1.8 Summary of Financial Analysis………………………………………… 39 2.2.0 Strategic Analysis……………………………………………………………… 39 2.2.1 Current Business Level Strategies………………………………………. 39 2.2.2 Elements of Company’s Strategy……………………………………….. 40 2.2.3 Components of Company’s Business Level Strategy……………………. 42 2.2.4 How Well the Company’s Strategy is Working………………………… 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 5 of 87
  6. 6. 43 2.2.5 Summary of Strategic Analysis…………………………………………. 44 2.3.0 Value Chain Analysis……………………………………………………………. 44 2.3.1 Analysis of Primary Activities………………………………………….. 45 2.3.2 Analysis of Support Activities……………………………………..…… 46 2.3.3 Analysis of Company’s Cost Competitiveness in Relation to Rivals…… 46 2.3.4 Summary of Value Chain Analysis……………………………………… 47 2.4.0 SWOT Analysis………………………………………………………………… 48 2.4.1 Strengths………………………………………………………………. 48 2.4.2 Weaknesses……………………………………………………………… 49 2.4.3 Opportunities………………………………………………………….. 50 2.4.4 Threat…………………………………………………………………. 51 2.4.5 Summary of SWOT Analysis…………………………………………. 51 3.0.0 References…………..………………..……………………………………….. 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 6 of 87
  7. 7. 52 1.0.0 External Environmental Analysis 1.1.0 General Environment Analysis All companies whether global, regional, or local operate in a macro-environment shaped by influences stemming from the economy at large, population demographics, societal values and lifestyles, governmental legislations and regulations, technological factors, and the industry and competitive arena in which the company operates. Most organizations do not have direct influence on its broad environment such as society, the economy, technology, global politics; it can shield itself from most threats and take advantage of opportunities as they present themselves. Many major companies have lost industry dominance, market share, or gone out of business because of their failure to recognize and adapt to changes in their environments, or by failing to be leaders in making necessary changes. The key point is that an organization needs to be in tune with its often turbulent external environment. There must be a strategic fit between what the external environment needs or wants and what the organization has to offer. 1.1.1 Demographic Segment Population Size The world population is in the midst of an unprecedented transformation brought about by the transition from a regime of high mortality and high fertility to one of low 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 7 of 87
  8. 8. mortality and low fertility. This demographic transition is responsible for the rapid and accelerating growth that the world population experienced in the twentieth century as well as for the slowing down of that growth and for the changes in the age distribution associated with those developments (United Nations, 2005). Figure 1 below, illustrates the World’s population growth over a 100 year span. Procter and Gambles currently sales over 300 brands in over 180 countries around the world to people from all ages, genders, ethnicity, social classes, and walks of life. The increase in the world’s population provides a direct opportunity for P & G to increase the number of products sold each year (Procter & Gamble 2009). Figure 1 World Population: 1950-2050 10 Population (billions) 8 6 4 2 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Year Source: United Nations The emerging markets of Africa, Asia and Latin America present significant opportunities for P&G because of the growth in the number of people that will be within P & G target market. The graph below represents the percentage of the world’s population mix by continent. Table 1 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 8 of 87
  9. 9. Population Percentage Estimates Continent 1950 1975 2000 2010 2025 2050 Africa 8.99% 10.31% 13.40% 14.95% 17.48% 21.84% Asia 55.46% 58.59% 60.48% 60.31% 59.57% 57.17% Europe 21.64% 16.65% 11.88% 10.61% 9.10% 7.55% Latin America and the Caribbean 6.61% 7.96% 8.52% 8.52% 8.36% 7.97% North America 6.78% 5.97% 5.21% 5.09% 4.96% 4.90% Oceania 0.51% 0.52% 0.51% 0.52% 0.53% 0.56% World 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Source: Geohive 1.1.2 Economic Segment The United States, the country with the world’s largest economy, is currently in an economic recession. Since the recession began in December 2007, the real gross domestic product (GDP), the total value of U.S. goods and services produced in a year and a basic measure of an economy’s performance, dropped at an annual rate of more than 6 percent in the fourth quarter of 2008. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said conditions in the labor market and declines in the value of housing along with tight consumer credit conditions will continue to hold consumers back from spending more until they experience a loosening of conditions that impact them directly. Bernanke said economic activity abroad is also an important consideration in how soon the U.S. economy rebounds. He states “the steep drop in U.S. exports that began last fall has been a significant drag on domestic production, and any improvement on that front would be helpful”. (America.gov) 1.1.3 Political/Legal Segment With the U.S. economy currently experiencing a recession, other countries may not be far behind. Japan, Britain, Spain and Singapore, which together represent about 12 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 9 of 87
  10. 10. percent of the world’s economy, are equally vulnerable as fallout from the U.S. worsens their economic weakness. Even emerging markets, including China, are likely to suffer as exports to the U.S diminish. The developing slump has put pressure on central bankers in Japan, the U.K. and the euro region to follow the lead of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, who in the 1st quarter of 2009 accelerated interest- rate cuts in the U.S. with an emergency move to lower the benchmark rate by three-quarters of a percentage point. The effect of the U.S. recession, which according to the IMF represents about 21 percent of the global economy, is spreading via multiple channels. There is less spending by American consumers and companies are reducing demand for imported goods. The meltdown of the U.S. subprime-mortgage market has pushed up credit costs worldwide and forced European and Asian banks to write down billions of dollars in holdings. Tumbling U.S. stock prices are also dragging down markets elsewhere. (Miller 2009) 1.1.4 Socio-Cultural Segment Women form the major target group for household, personal products and consumer goods companies. Several P&G consumer products, such as skin care and beauty care, are addressed directly to women. Other products, such as food and beverages, home cleaning and detergents are addressed to women as the primary decision makers or decision influencers. In addition to the media choice, companies have to decide on the type of programs they sponsor, so as to attract the attention of their target audience. 1.1.5 Technological Segment Organizations are rapidly trying to incorporate the Internet into their supply chain practices. Global competitive pressure and heightened shareholder expectations have 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 10 of 87
  11. 11. accelerated the rate of Internet adoption.Electronic markets are Web sites where buyers and sellers converge to advertise, bid for products in auctions, post catalog information, procure inventory, and manage inventory and fulfillment. An electronic market can be aligned vertically, focusing on the procurement of industry-specific products such as paper, metal, chemicals, agriculture, and energy. Or it can be horizontal, providing products for a diverse range of industries. These markets act as hubs where buyers can procure direct goods, and suppliers can market their products. In many respects, the electronic market is a microcosm of the many-to-many supply chain market advocated earlier. Today, electronic markets deal mostly with transactions related to the procurement of indirect and direct goods, whether they are by auction, request for proposal (RFP), spot electronic procurement, or e-catalogs. P&G can use the electronic marketplaces to consolidate its location on where to procure goods, which can immensely lower the administrative and inventory costs. It also provides P&G and others an additional channel to market their goods. (Kahl & Berquist 2000). 1.1.6 Global Segment Procter and Gamble operates in more than 80 countries worldwide and sells more than 300 products to over 5 billion people. The health of each nation’s economy and the global economy as a whole affects P&G operations immensely. Given the current economic recession of the United States, the world’s largest economy, the International Monetary Fund predicts that the world economy, which grew by a robust 4.9% last 2007, to slow sharply. The IMF predicts the global economy to grow by 3.7% in 2009 and 3.8% in 2010 (IMF says U.S. recession, 2008). The graph below, lists the Current U.S. Economic Indicators. 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 11 of 87
  12. 12. Table 2 Current U.S. Economic Indicators October 06, 2009 (Close of Day) Indicator Value Inflation % -1.44 GDP Growth % -0.74 Unemployment % 9.80 Gold $/oz 1,038.75 Oil $/bbl 70.88 Prime % 3.25 Source: www.forecast.org 1.1.7 Summary of General Environment Analysis In the fast changing world of electronic commerce, no industry has been left untouched by the impact of the Internet and the World Wide Web. The Internet has caused fundamental shifts in the way consumers shop for and purchase goods and services. This shift has the most impact on the household and personal care industry. This industry is very dependent on the population growth of both developed and developing countries. Major companies such as Procter and Gamble (P&G), market their products to every demographic member of the global community. The final factor affecting this industry is the current state of the global economy, especially the United States with the world’s largest economy. 1.2.0 Driving Forces Product innovation Procter & Gamble attempts to maintain its competitive edge by focusing on product innovation. P&G currently spends almost twice as much on R&D spending nearly $2.2 billion in 2008 as its closest competitor. The two most important factors in P&G's innovation process are its practice of consumer demand research and its "Connect and Develop" R&D structure. When P&G 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 12 of 87
  13. 13. first enters a new market it sets up in-home visits with consumers in order to fully comprehend the needs, wants, and desires its’ potential consumers have for household and personal products. P&G also incorporates consumers' input into the R&D process through its "Connect and Develop" initiative. Through "Connect and Develop" P&G has an online website where people can submit what P&G calls “game-changing product” ideas, and provide input on topics such as packaging, product improvement and services offered. P&G’s staff collects and sorts through all the ideas and work with the most promising ones. This process is not responsible for the entire R&D that P&G does, but approximately 42% of new products in the last several years were influenced by or originated from "Connect and Develop." (PGconnectdevelop.com) Regulatory influences and government policy changes Several consumer protection groups are voicing concerns over the presence of harmful chemical ingredients in cosmetic products. A recent study showed that about one third of cosmetic products contain carcinogens. Due to increasing public pressure, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is expected to impose stringent quality norms on cosmetic products. New regulations may delay the launch of new products for companies like P&G and result in higher product development expenditure. In Europe new rules on ingredients contained in a European Union draft are expected to come into force this year and a European Chemicals Agency has been created to improve regulation of products. The cost of compliance with more stringent regulations creates new barriers of entry and increases the number of counterfeits of household and personal care products on the market. P&G and other companies must monitor and try to control the widespread use of counterfeit products because they can both weaken a companies' brand image, and also divert revenues that should be obtained by the brand's owner. 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 13 of 87
  14. 14. Changes is cost P&G depends heavily on a diverse number of global commodities for manufacturing its goods. Since 2002 prices have risen by nearly 50%. Nearly half of the P&G’s cost of goods is directly related to commodity goods. The company has increased prices due to higher costs of oil and other raw materials. In its recent conference call, the company stated that it expected raw material costs to increase $3 billion in 2009. The company has raised prices on most products such as Cascade dishwashing detergent, Iams pet food, and Gillette razors to counter the increasing cost of oil in the first half of 2008. As the market leader, the company does benefit from pricing power and can moderate commodity inflation better than its competitors (Wolf, 2008). Some commodities of note: ▪ Coffee prices affect P&G’s Folgers’s brand, which most suffered from the rising coffee prices as a result of Hurricane Katrina ▪ Growing paper pulp prices affect several of the company's tissue businesses, as well as many of its products' paper packaging ▪ Increasing petroleum prices affect the fabric and home care businesses. ▪ Natural gas is a key energy input into the manufacturing process of toilet and diaper goods, which are air dried Changing societal concerns, attitudes, and lifestyles Societal concerns, attitudes, and changing lifestyle not only affect P&G but every company in the world that provides products, goods and services. P&G has faced a number of boycotts over the years concerning the use of animals in testing the effects of its products. Animal rights organizations argue that it is not only the specific practices of individual companies that cause problems, but the attitude created by the currrent system of exploitation that gives power and profits to the few, at the expense of people, animals and the environment. They feel it is important to expose the unethical practices of specific companies as their behavior is often indicative of the entire system. 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 14 of 87
  15. 15. P&G admitted in 2005 at the 5th World Congress on Alternative and Animal Use in the Life Sciences in Berlin, Germany that “P&G sometimes conducts research using animals to demonstrate safety or efficacy in pharmaceuticals, pet nutrition studies and for consumer products. Such studies are only conducted as a last resort once all other reasonable options have been excluded”. P&G stated that it ultimately wants to eliminate the need for all research involving animals for consumer products and their ingredients (Procter & Gamble at the 5th World Congress, 2005). In the meantime, P&G is dedicated to use non-animal alternatives whenever possible across the company. P&G also stated that a large majority of its research studies do not employ animals. Animal testing is therefore the exception, not the rule at P&G. In order to control and protect its company image, P&G has been working with government and different academia to promote the acceptance of alternative ways for testing its products. P&G claim that it wants to ultimately eliminate the need for all research involving animals for consumer products and their ingredients (Procter & Gamble at the 5th World Congress, 2005). 1.3.0 Industry Analysis The global household and personal products industry generated total revenues of $503.3 billion in 2008. During the period from 2004 to 2008 the compound annual growth rate (GAGR) was approximately 3.8%. The sales of personal products proved to be the most lucrative for the global household and personal products industry in 2008, generating total revenues of $408.5 billion, equivalent to 81.17% of the industry's overall value. The performance of the industry is forecast to decelerate slightly, with an anticipated CAGR of 3.7% for the five-year period 2008-2013, which is expected to drive 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 15 of 87
  16. 16. the industry to a value of $602.7 billion by the end of 2013 (Household & Personal Products, 2008). Table 3 Compound Annual Growth Rate for Global Household & Personal Products Industry Year Total Revenue % Growth Rate 2004 434.1 2005 451.1 3.9% 2006 468.5 3.9% 2007 485.5 3.6% 2008 503.3 3.7% 2004-2008 3.8% Source: Datamonitor 1.3.1 Description of the Industry The global household and personal products industry consists of the global household products and personal product markets. Manufactures in this industry focus on selling products that meet the needs of everyday consumers in areas such as personal hygiene, beauty and health, pet care and other household products. They also produce and manufacturer different fragrances, hair care, make-up, oral hygiene, dishwashing products, furniture polish, general purpose cleaners, insecticides, scouring products, textile washing products and toilet care products. Procter and Gamble (P&G) is currently the market leader with over 16% of the market share in this diverse and crowed industry. Below, Figure 2 illustrates major manufactures in the industry and their perspective market share. Figure 2 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 16 of 87
  17. 17. Global Household & Personal Products Industry Share % 16.60% Procter & Gamble 5.40% Unilever L'Oréal S.A. 5.00% Kimberly-Clark 5.60% Johnson & Johnson 62.40% 3.20% Other Source: Datamonitor & Kimberly-Clark’s 10-K annual report 1.3.2 Industry Dominate Economic Features Market size and growth rate The global household and personal care industry generated total revenues of $40.7 billion in 2008, representing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.7% for the period spanning 2004-2008. In comparison, the Americas and European markets grew with CAGRs of 4.5% and 2.7%, respectively, over the same period, to reach respective values of $13.9 billion and $16.7 billion in 2008. Market consumption volumes increased with a CAGR of 3.1% during 2004-2008, to reach a total of 10.6 billion units in 2008. The market's volume is expected to rise to 12.2 billion units by the end of 2013, representing a CAGR of 2.9% for the 2008-2013 periods. (Household & Personal Products, 2008). Number of rivals The global household and personal products industry is a highly fragmented industry with an enormous amount of products and manufactures. P&G faces competition from local, low-cost manufacturers in developing countries and from increasing private 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 17 of 87
  18. 18. label brands introduced by large format retailers and discounters worldwide. P&G’s products must effectively compete with products from strong competitors as well as that of retail chains at all times (Procter & Gamble Company 2008). Scope of competitive rivalry There are considerable substitutes for all of P&G's product offerings, creating an intense competitive environment. In order to differentiate itself, the P&G must continue to provide new, innovative products and branding to the customer. Number of buyers Although P&G is an extreme large company, its future is dependent on buyers. Wal-Mart is P&G largest customer and accounted for over 15% of P&G total revenue in 2009, 2008, and 2007. This percentage of total revenue gives Wal-Mart the ability to bargain with the P&G for lower prices, which would result in lower earnings. The current credit crisis will not have a significant impact on P&G because of the diversity and “recession-proof” status of its products. The products that P&G offers can sustain a slowdown or recession in the US economy because of their product types. Consumers will continue to purchase these goods through an economic correction. While P&G had disappointing 2nd quarter earnings due to higher commodity costs in 2009, analysts’ reports indicate strong sales forecasts and growth opportunities for the rest of the year. Degree of product differentiation Procter and Gamble has one of the most diversified product portfolios among leading global manufactures and marketers of consumer products. P&G participates in more than 40 product categories with 300 brands in over 60 different markets. The company is organized into three global business units (GBUs): Beauty, Health and Well-Being, and Household Care. Please see Figure 21 for P&G three GBUs. 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 18 of 87
  19. 19. In the beauty segment, the company's products include cosmetics, deodorants, feminine care products, hair care, personal cleansing and skin care products. Tooth paste, pharmaceuticals, personal healthcare, and pet food products are marketed under the healthcare segment. The home care segment comprises of fabric care, hair care, dish care and surface care products. In addition, P&G's products include baby care and family care products such as diapers, baby wipes and bath tissue. The recent purchase of Gillette will add blades and razors, batteries, electric razors, and small appliances to its broad product offering. The company has more than 20 brands with sales exceeding one billion dollars, which, together, have sales of over $24 billion. Brands include Pampers, Tide, Ariel, Always, Whisper, Pantene, Bounty, Pringles, Crest, Clairol Nice 'n Easy, Actonel, Dawn and Olay (Procter & Gamble 2009). Product Innovation P&G’s global scale allows it to quickly flow innovation across developing countries. The diversity of P&G’s brand portfolio gives it the opportunity to innovate in more aspects of consumers’ lives than nearly any other company. P&G brands are in every room of the house, at virtually every hour of the day. As a result, P&G is able to get a better sense of consumers’ needs than other companies. This helps them spot more problems and allows P&G innovations to help solve consumer’s needs and wants. Demand Drivers Demand drivers in the household and personal care products industry include some of the following categories: price, demographics, household income, and innovation. The industry is mainly comprised of necessity products; meaning that even in times of recession, sales remain steady. The price of the product is generally reflected on the quality of the product and consumer preferences over a brand name or private label 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 19 of 87
  20. 20. brands. Disposable income also plays a role, if a consumer has more disposable income, they may buy the more expensive product. Pace of technological change Procter & Gamble’s advertising and R&D is spread over 44 brands that account for 90% of the company’s profits. This allows P&G more opportunities to leverage proprietary technology among multiple categories. Moreover, P&G’s research and development is enhanced by a global relationship with nearly two million researchers in technology areas connected with P&G businesses. New products can be quickly brought to market using P&G’s existing brands and distribution system. P&G’s relative level of innovation is apparent from the results of the 2008 industrial research institute’s pace setter study that measures the top new products measured by sales. In 2008, P&G had 10 out of 25 of the top new products in the non-food category. In comparison, Unilever, J&J, Kimberly Clark, Colgate (CL), L’Oreal (LRLCY.PK), and Energizer (ENR) collectively had 7 (Q4, 2009) Vertical Integration Procter & Gamble, along with many of its top competitors have formed strategic alliances and partnerships with suppliers such as Wal-Mart, Costco and other retailers in order to improve is supply chain management, reduce storage cost and improve efficiency. P&G has also created a special website for its customers called P&G Everyday Solutions where its customers can get product updates, free samples, and print coupons. Economies of Scale P&G will continue to innovate because economies of scale allow P&G to spend much more than rivals on R&D. For example, P&G spends over twice as much on 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 20 of 87
  21. 21. research and development than its nearest competitor. P&G’s largest competitors by trailing 4 quarters revenue are Unilever (UL) ($60B), Kimberly Clark (KMB) ($19B), and Johnson & Johnson’s (JNJ) consumer segment ($16B). Moreover, the same economies of scale allow P&G to efficiently signal this value to consumers through advertising. P&G economies of scale allow it to meet consumer needs in a particular region and then quickly flow that technology across multiple countries faster than its competitors. Learning / Experience Curve Effects Globally, there are many household care and personal product companies that P&G must constantly be aware of and their decisions. Switching costs remain very low in this industry and it allows consumers to easily switch their brands because of product dissatisfaction, increased costs, or even out-of-stocked items. Also it is becoming more difficult for consumers to differentiate competing brands as the number of product introductions is continually increasing. Companies within the industry are regularly enhancing older product lines, while new product lines are also being introduced. Being first to market can be extremely profitable for P&G or any other company, but it could also back fire as more brands and product features are offered, thus making it more difficult for consumers to differentiate among the products that are available. 1.3.3 Industry Trends The personal care industry had an excellent growth rate in all the major markets of the world in 2005-2006. Since the past few years, people have become more conscious about their appearance and look, which has led to a huge demand for these products worldwide. New products are launched by the leading brands to attract consumers. The 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 21 of 87
  22. 22. trends in all the leading personal care markets show that this industry has massive potential for growth. The women’s beauty industry is also growing at a rate of approximately USD 202.254 billion every year where as the global market for cosmetics alone USD 30.33 billion. The global personal care products industry is growing at a very rapid pace; some of the factors directly responsible for this growth are: ▪ Rise in consumer spending power ▪ Increased demand due to people consciousness ▪ Entry of herbal and organic products ▪ Lifestyle and climactic changes, and ▪ Massive advertising and promotion strategy 1.3.4 Summary of Industry Analysis In summary, the household and personal products industry is a mature, fragmented, and stable industry. The industry is considered highly competitive with considerable substitutes for most products on the market. In such a climate companies must be able to differentiate themselves and build customer loyalty by providing outstanding service and providing new, innovative products and branding to the everyday customers. The majority of developed countries are predicted to have only a small population increase in the next decade. The developing and emerging markets will provide P&G and other manufactures with incredible and unprecedented growth opportunities as economies become more globally intertwined. Most of the products within this market are considered recession proof and are considered necessities, therefore demand is typically stable. 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 22 of 87
  23. 23. 1.4.0 Five Forces Competitive Analysis Michael Porter developed a framework consisting of five competitive forces, which analyze how industry factors impacts a company's strategy. These factors are: the threat of new entrants, power of buyers, power of suppliers, availability of substitutes and competitive rivalry (Porter, 1985). Figure 3 Porter's Five Competive Forces Potential Entrants Suppliers' Power Industry Buyers' Power Competitors Substitutes Source: Michael Porter’s Competitive Advantage 1.4.1 Threat of New Entrants The enormous amount of products that are distributed under Procter & Gamble's name creates a challenge for new entrants. Since the P&G possess a significant amount of market shares around the world, a potential competitor that lack large sums of capital for heavy marketing and research and development, would hardly be able to effectively compete. However, there is concern about firms that specialize in niche markets. This type of company could possibly become a threat to P&G's corresponding business segment. Proctor and Gamble must continue to expand its operations internationally, due 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 23 of 87
  24. 24. to the decline of the US dollar to other currencies and the emergence of new markets, such as India or China. 1.4.2 Power of Buyers Although P&G is an extreme large company, its future is dependent on buyers. P&G is heavily dependent on Wal-Mart and its affiliates for generating a major part of its revenue. Sales to Wal-Mart and its affiliates have represented approximately 15% of its total revenue since 2006 thus creating the “Wal-Mart effect.” High dependence upon Wal-Mart reduces the bargaining power of P&G. Wal-Mart could use its bargaining power to impose unfavorable terms on the company. Any decrease in revenue from Wal- Mart could have a negative impact on the company's businesses. 1.4.3 Power of Suppliers P&G has a codependent relationship with most of its suppliers. In order to generate above average revenues the P&G needs various quality materials for product production at the best prices available. Suppliers of these materials also need key customers like P&G for profitable revenue generation and will very likely have little bargaining power because of its small size. P&G can use its tremendous size and large amounts of available cash to its advantage during this current credit crisis. Rising interest rates and the declining availability of credit ultimately should not affect P&G’s relationship with its suppliers. P&G’s successful history and large market share can be used to back its borrowings, under the assumption that P&G continues to maintain its current market share. 1.4.4 Threat of Substitutes There is substantial number of substitutes for all of P&G's product offerings, creating an intense competitive environment. In order to differentiate itself, the P&G 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 24 of 87
  25. 25. must continue to provide new, cutting edge, and innovative products and branding to the customer. P&G notes that working collaboratively with customers and developing deep shopper and consumer understanding will improve the in-store presence of its products and win the "first moment of truth." This happens when customers choose which brands to buy. Winning the "second moment of truth," when consumers decide whether P&G products deliver on the brand promise, is essential for growth in such a competitive environment (Procter & Gamble 2009). 1.4.5 Intensity of Rivalry The intensity of rivalry is very high in this industry. P&G has several strong competitors in different markets like Amway Corporation, Intimate Brands, Colgate- Palmolive Company, Kimberly-Clark, Maybelline, Johnson & Johnson, Revlon, Inc., Estée Lauder, General Mills, S.C. Johnson & Son, Unilever, Sara Lee Corporation among other big and medium sized competitors (Jones, 2005). Another important element affecting the intensity of rivalry is that the switching costs in this industry are quite low as it does not cost anything for a consumer to buy one brand of a consumer product instead of another. The thing in favor of P&G is that unlike most of its competitors, who use wholesalers who sell a variety of competing products, P&G’s network, while independently owned and operated, mainly sells only P&G products giving the company a slight competitive advantage. 1.4.6 Summary of Five Forces Competitive Analysis The Michael Porter's Five Force Competitive Analysis is a powerful tool that helps business managers understand both the strength of their company’s current competitive position and whether new products, services or businesses have the potential to be profitable. With a clear understanding of where power lies, managers can take 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 25 of 87
  26. 26. advantage of a company’s situation of strength, improve a situation of weakness, and avoid taking wrong steps. The factors affecting P&G are economic, political, social, technological advancements, environmental and legal. A detailed SWOT analysis revealed that the company enjoys the strengths of a strong brand, R&D capabilities and strong global infrastructure but also depends too much on a few top customers such as Wal-Mart and mature markets. P&G should leverage its strengths to realize opportunities in emerging markets and thwart away the threat from intense competition and increase in raw materials. In the consumer products industry, P&G has a limited supplier power, mixed buyer power, high risk of substitutes, intense competition and enjoys low risk of new entrants. 1.5.0 Competitor Analysis The global household and personal care industry is an $82.6 billion dollar industry. It is projected to have a market value of $95.1 billion by 2013. In 2008, the United States accounted for over $17.2 billion and Europe was estimated to be around $35.1 billion. Supermarkets and hypermarkets lead the global household products market, distributing 56.1% of the market’s overall value. P&G accounts for 17.1% of the global household and personal care products market value. Procter & Gamble principal activity is manufacturing and marketing consumer products. It operates in six business segments: Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Snacks, Coffee and Pet Care; Fabric Care and Home Care. The Beauty Care segment includes cosmetics, deodorants, fragrances, hair care and other products. Grooming includes blades and razors, electric hair removal devices, face and shave products and home appliances. The Health Care segment includes feminine care, oral care, personal health 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 26 of 87
  27. 27. care and pharmaceuticals. The Snacks, Coffee and Pet Care segment includes coffee, pet food and snacks. The Fabric Care and Home Care business includes air care, batteries, dish care, fabric care and surface care. The Baby Care and Family Care business includes baby wipes, bath tissue, diapers and facial tissue. Some of its brands are Head & Shoulders, Olay, Pantene, Gillette, Oral-B, Pringles, Ariel, Tide, Downy and Pampers. The products are sold in more than 180 countries around the world. 1.5.1 What Market positions rivals occupy Procter & Gamble (P&G) is the world's largest producer of household and personal products by revenue with net sales of $83,503 million and with its products reaching 4 billion people worldwide. P&G's product line includes 24 brands across beauty, healthcare, and food including Tide detergent, Pampers diapers, and Gillette razors, that generate over $1 billion in revenue annually. One of the key areas of growth for the company is in emerging markets worldwide. Sales in developing nations have increased steadily from 20% of total revenue in 2002 to 30% in 2008. According to Wikinvest.com P&G already owns a large and growing market share in countries including China and Russia. In light of the global economic downturn, P&G has announced it will focus its growth strategy on emerging markets, opening almost all of its 20 new manufacturing facilities outside its established markets. Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is the world's second largest and most broadly based manufacturer of health care products, with 2008 annual sales of $63.8 billion. The company holds a significant share of the consumer and pharmaceutical markets, and is the world's largest developer and manufacturer of medical treatment and diagnostic devices. In the company's continuing effort to diversify its business and increase profits, JNJ is constantly acquiring new companies. According to Wikinvest.com, JNJ acquired 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 27 of 87
  28. 28. 8 companies in 2008. JNJ over-the-counter pharmaceuticals and nutritionals include: skin care, baby & kids care, and women's health products, totaling $16.0 billion in sales in 2008. Although the Consumer Health Care division is the smallest of the company's three segments, it includes some of the company's most recognizable brands such as Tylenol, Neutrogena, and Band-Aid. Kimberly-Clark is a consumer products giant with 19.4 billion in sales for FY 2008 and net income of $1.7 billion. KMB is microscopic in comparison to P&G, but nevertheless a large force to be reckoned within the consumer products industry. In fact, KMB continues to hold a significant market share in household and personal care industry, with the No. 1 or No. 2 market share position in more than 80 countries. In order to see continued growth and profits, however, Kimberly-Clark must develop new innovative products or figure out a way to compete more effectively with its current line of products. If KMB cannot do this, it is possible that the company will become increasingly less profitable. 1.5.2 Strategic group maps of competitors Driving forces and competitive pressures do not affect all strategic groups evenly. Profit prospects vary from group to group based on the relative attractiveness of their market potential. A Strategic group is a cluster of firms in an industry with similar competitive approaches and market positions. Strategic group mapping is an analytical tool for displaying the different market and/or competitive positions that rival firms occupy in a particular industry. Figure 4 and Figure 5 below represent the strategic group map of the household and personal care industry with three main competitors. Figure 4 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 28 of 87
  29. 29. Household and Personal Care Industry Strategic Group Map High Johnson & Johnson Procter & Net Income Gamble Kimberly -Clark Low Number of Operations in Different Countries Low High Figure 5 Household and Personal Care Industry Strategic Group Map High Procter & Gamble Market Share Kimberly -Clark Johnson & Johnson Low Advertising Expenditure Low High 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 29 of 87
  30. 30. 1.5.3 Competitor’s Strategies JNJ diverse revenue base has helped insulate it from the highs and lows that affect its competitors from time to time. As a result of this and its acquisition strategy, JNJ has reported more than 70 years of sales growth and produce impressive free cash flow, which is its operating cash flow less capital expenditures, reaching almost 20% of sales. This excellent cash generation has enabled JNJ to grow its dividend for the last 44 years, a trend that is expected to continue in the next couple of years. KMB has been expanding its portfolio of services by entering into strategic agreements, and acquiring alliances in order to strengthen its position in the industry. In March of last year, KMB decided to purchase the remaining shares of its South African subsidiary, Kimberly-Clark of South Africa (K-CSA) from the Lion Match Company. K- CSA is a leading manufacturer and marketer of tissue, personal care and business-to- business products and also markets Kimberly-Clark's line of health care products. KMB increased ownership in K-CSA will allow it to expend its international reach and gain market share in the African region. 1.5.4 Strength and Weaknesses of competitors Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), the world’s leading consumer health company, is engaged in the R&D, manufacture and sale of household and personal care products, pharmaceuticals and medical devices and diagnostics. JNJ has a number of strengths and weaknesses which are depicted in the table below. Table 4 Strengths Weakness ▪ Strong Brand Image ▪ Over Dependence on Pharmaceutical Sales ▪ R&D ▪ Lack of size in therms of revenue ▪ Interaction with Customers ▪ ▪ 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 30 of 87
  31. 31. J&J attaches great importance to developing an understanding about its products among consumers, doctors and medical professionals. There is also a constant focus on educating customers. This constant interaction with customers has afforded JNJ the ability to grow its brand image that is almost unparallel to anyone else. JNJ’s R&D team of scientists works in partnership with the marketing department and product supply teams to improve products, packaging and supporting advertising claims. Several new products have been developed and launched successfully by understanding the consumer’s wants, needs, and requirements. Despite its remarkable strengths, JNJ has a number of weaknesses. More than 40% of J&J’s revenue currently comes from its pharmaceutical group, with seven drugs each bringing in more than $1 billion in sales. Even with a strong brand portfolio and geographically diversified operations, JNJ lacks the size, in terms of revenue, to compete with companies like Procter & Gamble, whose revenues for the fiscal year ended June 2008 were $83,503 million, where as JNJ were $63,747 million. Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is a global health and hygiene company offering household and personal care and consumer tissue products. KMB has a number of strengths and weaknesses which are represented in the table below. Table 5 Strengths Weakness ▪ Strong Brand Image ▪ Lack of Scale ▪ Strong Customer Loyalty ▪ High Dependence on Wal-Mart ▪ Broad Portfolio of Products ▪ Lack of International Revenue ▪ Diversified business structure Kimberly-Clark's product portfolio includes some of the most popular brands of the world such as GoodNites, Cottonelle, Kleenex, Scott, Andrex, Hakle, Huggies, Pull- 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 31 of 87
  32. 32. Ups, Kotex, Poise, Kimberly-Clark, Fiesta, Little Swimmers, Andrex, Ballard, Kimwipes, Lightdays, Page and Depend. KMB has some of the most recognizable products in the industry that have allowed it to achieve consumer loyalty and over time have ensured a lofty market share. KMB has a diversified business structure that has been organized into four reportable global business segments: Personal Care; Consumer Tissue; K-C Professional & Other; and Health Care. Wal-Mart is KMB largest customers and accounted for approximately 14 percent in 2008 and 2007, and approximately 13 percent in 2006 of its net sales and revenue. KMB had approximately $10,461 million, which was 52.1% of the total revenue coming from the North American region; out of which $10,143 was from the U.S. alone. 1.5.5 Competitor’s next moves In an effort to keep pace with a more competitive and ever changing market Johnson & Johnson has decided to focus on redefining the image of certain products through marketing drives that are closely integrated with packaging and product design. The success of many of Johnson & Johnson’s packaging redesign projects is based partly on the creative imagination of the designers. Within this new structure today, JNJ also believes that another key focus is on relationship management. JNJ wants to ensure that all divisions, from R&D to sales, communicate effectively and collaborate around shared goals. Within a collaborative environment that functions well, the product is linked to the process of packaging design at a much earlier stage than ever before. JNJ believes that this bond between product design and packaging design is crucially important to the future success of any advertising and/or marketing campaign, because all internal stakeholders have an input on the final product and the strategy to place it in the market. 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 32 of 87
  33. 33. KMB main focus is on its growth through acquisitions. KMB in October 2008, purchased the remaining shares of Colombina Kimberly Colpapel (CKC) from Compañía Colombiana de Inversiones. This acquisition will enhance KMB’s growth potential in the rapidly developing markets of Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela. Earlier this year, KMB acquired Jackson Products, a privately held safety products company. Jackson Products was one of the leading providers of welding safety products, personal protective equipment and work zone safety products. The acquisition is expected to bring a wealth of strengths to Kimberly-Clark's professional business, including a strong product portfolio with an experienced sales force. Kimberly-Clark will also focus its growth through product innovation. The company will spend approximately 1.5% of its annual revenue on R&D in an effort to drive innovative new products to the market. KMB will work more closely with customers in order to increase shopper loyalty. Finally, in order to further build brand equity and market share, KMB has decided to increase its marketing spending by $200 million over the last four years and plans to continue increasing its marketing investments for the foreseeable future. 1.5.6 Competitive advantage of company in relation to the rivals Procter and Gamble is one of the most admired and industry dominating companies in the world today. P&G takes great pride in the products they produce and work hard to ensure that their products are of the highest quality. They strongly believe in the importance of advertising and research and development. They research intensely to determine their target markets and what types of products would best fit their needs. In fact P&G currently spends almost twice as much on R&D spending nearly $2.2 billion in 2008 as its closest competitor. P&G’s advertising and R&D are spread over 44 brands 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 33 of 87
  34. 34. that account for 90% of the company’s profits. P&G’s research and development is enhanced by a global relationship with nearly two million researchers in technology areas connected with P&G businesses. P&G promotes its products to those who most fit their target market by appealing to the lifestyles that the consumer lives and understanding what the consumer’s values and morals are. P&G has a long standing reputation of having a family of products that are of excellent quality and continues to be a leader in household goods. 1.5.7 Summary of competitor analysis The household and personal care products industry is a highly competitive, mature, and stable industry for the market. More times than not, it has not experienced the major downfalls because of the economy. From the information provided by most analysts a general conclusion can normally be made about the nature of this industry. According to most analysts most slips in sales or volume are resulting from current economical standings; however, these drops are not normally significant enough to affect an industry that provides products people rely on for everyday living. Generally, when the market falters it is because of a decrease in the consumers’ purchase of luxury items. The household and personal care industry offer both types, necessity products which are normally considered recession proof products and those of luxury. In order for P&G to maintain its current market position, they must continue to scan the environment for possible threats. Whether through acquisitions or Greenfield investments, P&G must start to focus on developing and emerging markets. Rising gas prices and new regulations will not only impact P&G but its competitors also. Therefore P&G must work non-stop to ensure that they can continue to put forth a superior quality 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 34 of 87
  35. 35. of product. P&G has many loyal customers and has to continue to meet their needs while attracting new customers in order to remain on top of their industry. 2.0.0 Internal Analysis and SWOT Analysis 2.1.0 Financial Analysis Financial analysis is the use of financial statements to analyze a company’s financial position and performance, and to assess future financial performance. It reduces the reliance on hunches, guesses, and intuition for business decisions. Procter and Gamble and it competitors’ financial statements were obtained from Yahoo Finance, AOL Money & Finance, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The most recent annual 10-K report from each of the companies was evaluated in order to insure the accuracy of the information provided. 2.4.1 Valuation Analysis Financial minds are constantly trying to measure the value of securities (or businesses). Valuation ratios are mathematical calculations that help individuals assess and determine the cost of a security (or business) to the benefits of owning it. These ratios are typically calculated by dividing a measure of price by a measure of value or vice-versa. For purposes of my analysis, I am applying the following ratios: Price/earnings ratio, Price to earnings growth ratio, Price/Cash flow ratio, Price/Book ratio and Dividend yield. Table 6 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 35 of 87
  36. 36. Valuation Ratios PG JNJ KMB Industry Market Cap 168.28 Billion 167.94 Billion 24.48 Billion 260 Billion P/E Ratio 16.71 14.14 14.44 16.90 P/E Growth Ratio 1.46 1.65 1.50 N/A Price/Cash Flow Ratio 11.70 10.70 10.30 12.90 Price/BookRatio 2.69 3.62 5.41 5.82 Dividend Yield 2.51 3.00 4.40 2.9 Source: MSN Money ▪ Price/earnings ratio (P/E): This formula is calculated by dividing the price of the stock per share by the earnings per share. Although this calculation is simple, the information is readily available and the ratio is a good valuation method to use versus peers and for historical purposes. ▪ PEG ratio (Price to earnings growth ratio): This ratio is closely related to the first ratio, but it is slightly more dynamic and incorporates the estimated growth of a company. In the PEG ratio the formula uses the price/earnings ratio and then divides that number by the expected annual earnings per share growth rate. This is a great valuation method to use when considering whether a stock that is growing quickly is still a good value or not, but the method is also subject to objective guesses as to the growth rate. ▪ Price/cash flow ratio: This method measures the ability of a company to provide cash flow on a per share basis. The ratio is calculated by taking the stock price per share and dividing that by the operating cash flow per share. A top reason to use this method is that it typically excludes possible accounting distortions that other investment ratios might not be able to exclude. 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 36 of 87
  37. 37. ▪ Price/book value ratio: The book value of a company is a nice conservative valuation method that value investors and more traditional investors love to use. The price book value ratio is found by taking the stock price per share and dividing it by the shareholder’s equity per share. Over the years the book value has lost importance in many circles due to its undervaluing of modern asset types. ▪ Dividend Yield: While not every stock has a dividend, understanding that a dividend yield is essential in valuing a company is important. An investor can find the dividend yield of a stock by taking the annual dividend amount per share and dividing that by the stock price per share. A Dividend yielding stocks are typically more mature and more value related, as opposed to growth stocks which often yield nothing or almost nothing. Valuation Conclusion: Although the P/E ratio is slightly higher than the peer comparison, the P/E ratio is in line with the industry. Plus, based on the more favorable P/E growth ratio, cash flow and book ratio, it appears P&G is a more valuable option than JNJ and KMB; therefore, investors are willing to spend more for an ownership interest in P&G. 2.4.2 Growth Analysis Growth ratios or growth rates tell us just how fast a company is growing. The most important of these growth ratios include: ▪ Sales %: Sales growth is normally stated in terms of a percentage growth from the prior year. Sales is the term used for operating revenues so it is important to see the sales growth rate as high as possible. 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 37 of 87
  38. 38. Figure 6 Sales % 200 6 Kim be rly- Cla rk 200 7 Joh nso n & Joh nso n Pr octer & G amb le 200 8 0.0% 5.0% 1 0.0% 1 5.0 % 2 0.0 % 2 5.0 % 2008 2007 2006 Procter & Gamble 9.2% 12.1% 20.2% Johnson & Johnson 4.3% 14.6% 5.6% Kimberly-Clark 6.3% 9.1% 5.3% Source: Data and Chart constructed from each company’s 10-K Annual Report ▪ Net Income: Growth in net income is even more important that sales because net income tells you how much money is left over after all of the operating costs are subtracted from sales. Figure 7 Net Income % 2 5.00 % 2 2.40 % 2 1 .6 0% 19 .10 % 1 9.6 0% 2 0.00 % 16 .80 % 1 5.00 % 9.9 0% 1 0.00 % P ro cter & Ga mb le Jo hn so n & Jo hn son 5.00 % K imb e rly-Cl ar k 0.00 % 2 0 08 2 00 7 2 00 6 -5.00 % - 4.30 % -4 .40 % - 7.30 % -1 0.00 % 2008 2007 2006 Procter & Gamble 16.80% 19.10% 19.60% Johnson & Johnson 22.40% -4.30% 9.90% Kimberly-Clark -7.30% 21.60% -4.40% Source: Data and Chart constructed from each company’s 10-K Annual Report 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 38 of 87
  39. 39. ▪ Dividends: Dividend growth is a good indicator of the financial health of a company. Some companies do not pay stock dividends at all; rather they use these excess profits to reinvest money back into the company to hopefully accelerate growth. One thing we like to see in Dividends (%) is that it does not go negative. That is, once a dividend rate is established, a company needs to have a very good reason to decrease the dividend payout. Figure 8 Dividend Yield % 20 06 Ki mbe rl y-Cla rk 20 07 Joh nso n & Joh nso n Pr octe r & G am ble 20 08 0.0 0% 0 .0 1% 0 .01 % 0.02 % 0.0 2% 2008 2007 2006 Procter & Gamble 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% Johnson & Johnson 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% Kimberly-Clark 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% Source: Data and Chart constructed from each company’s 10-K Annual Report Growth Analysis Conclusion: P&G has demonstrated a stronger ability to grow than JNJ ad KMB. P&G’s sales growth has outpaced their peers and has resulted in strong net income growth. P&G has been able to grow sales and net income year over year unlike its peers. 2.4.3 Profitability Analysis 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 39 of 87
  40. 40. Profitability ratios or profitability margins are a good indicator of how efficient a company is operating. This is a measure were you would normally compare a company to its industry as a benchmark rather than the overall stock market since the profitability of companies can vary greatly by industry. ▪ Gross Margin (%): Sales Revenue less COGS divided by net sales revenue Figure 9 Gross Profit Margin % 30% 2006 72% 51% 31% K imberly-Clark 2007 71 % Johnson & Johnson 52% P rocter & G amble 30 % 2008 71% 51% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 6 0% 70% 80% 2008 2007 2006 Procter & Gamble 51% 52% 51% Johnson & Johnson 71% 71% 72% Kimberly-Clark 30% 31% 30% Source: Data and Chart constructed from each company’s 10-K Annual Report ▪ Earnings per Share trending Figure 10 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 40 of 87
  41. 41. Earning per Share $5.00 $4.55 $4.25 $4.50 $4.14 $4.15 $3.76 $3.90 $4.00 $3.64 $3.50 $3.04 $3.00 $2.64 Procter & Gamble $2.50 Johnson & Johnson $2.00 Kimberly-Clark $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 Procter & Gamble $3.64 $3.04 $2.64 Johnson & Johnson $4.55 $4.15 $3.76 Kimberly-Clark $4.14 $4.25 $3.90 Source: Data and Chart constructed from each company’s 10-K Annual Report ▪ Net Profit Margin (%): Gross sales revenue less all (not just COGS) expenses divided by gross revenue. The net profit margin is the ratio of net profits to sales. This is the best indicator of the company's efficiency in that net profit takes into consideration all expenses of the company. You want the net profit margin to be as high as possible. Figure 11 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 41 of 87
  42. 42. Net Profit Margin % 25% 21% 20% 20% 17% 14% 14% 13% Procter & Gam ble 15% 10% Johnson & Jo hnson 10% 9% 9% Kimberly-Cla rk 5% 0% 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 Procter & Gamble 14% 14% 13% Johnson & Johnson 20% 17% 21% Kimberly-Clark 9% 10% 9% Source: Data and Chart constructed from each company’s 10-K Annual Report Profitability Conclusion: Although P&G shows solid profitability performance, JNJ appears to be the benchmark for our comparison. P&G demonstrates a strong gross margin and healthy net margin. However, both peer comparisons demonstrate stronger per share performance. 2.1.4 Financial Strength Analysis ▪ Current Ratio: current assets/current liabilities Figure 12 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 42 of 87
  43. 43. Current Ratio 1.8 1.65 1.51 1.6 1.4 1.22 1.24 1.22 1.20 1.2 1.05 Procter & Gamble 1 0.79 0.78 Johnson & Johnson 0.8 Kimberly-Clark 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 Procter & Gamble 0.79 0.78 1.22 Johnson & Johnson 1.65 1.51 1.20 Kimberly-Clark 1.22 1.24 1.05 Source: Data and Chart constructed from each company’s 10-K Annual Report ▪ Quick Ratio: cash + net receivables + marketable securities/ current liabilities Figure 13 Quick Ratio 1.6 1.41 1.4 1.25 1.2 0.90 0.94 1 Procter & Gamble 0.70 0.74 0.8 J ohnson & Johnson 0.56 0.65 0.52 Kimberly-Clark 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 Procter & Gamble 0.52 0.56 0.90 Johnson & Johnson 1.41 1.25 0.94 Kimberly-Clark 0.70 0.74 0.65 Source: Data and Chart constructed from each company’s 10-K Annual Report ▪ Working capital: Current assets less current liabilities 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 43 of 87
  44. 44. Figure 14 Working Capital $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 Procter & Gamble Johnson & Johnson $0 Kimberly-Clark 2008 2007 2006 ($5,000,000) ($10,000,000) 2008 2007 2006 Procter & Gamble ($6,443,000) ($6,686,000) $4,344,000 Johnson & Johnson $13,525,000 $10,108,000 $3,814,000 Kimberly-Clark $1,061,000 $1,168,000 $253,000 Source: Data and Chart constructed from each company’s 10-K Annual Report ▪ Times interest earned: Net income + interest exp + income tax expense divided by interest expense Figure 15 Times -Interes t-Earned 200 175.44 180 160 140 120 Procter & Gamble 100 95.73 J ohnson & Johnson 80 Kimberly-Clark 60 29.77 40 8. 23 5.59 7.93 6.88 7.75 6.81 20 0 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 Procter & Gamble 8.23 7.93 7.75 Johnson & Johnson 29.77 95.73 175.44 Kimberly-Clark 5.59 6.88 6.81 Source: Data and Chart constructed from each company’s 10-K Annual Report 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 44 of 87
  45. 45. ▪ Debt-equity ratio: Total liabilities/ total shareholders equity Figure 16 Debt-to-Equity Ratio 2 00 6 ` K imb er ly-Cla rk 2 00 7 Jo hn son & Joh n son P rocte r & G am bl e 2 00 8 0 0 .5 1 1.5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 2008 2007 2006 Procter & Gamble 1.07 1.07 1.16 Johnson & Johnson 1.00 0.87 0.79 Kimberly-Clark 3.40 2.34 1.80 Source: Data and Chart constructed from each company’s 10-K Annual Report ▪ Debt-to-Assets Ratio: total liabilities/total assets Figure 17 Debt-to-Assets Ratio 0.8 0.73 0.66 0.7 0.64 0.6 0.54 0.52 0.50 0.52 0.5 0.46 0.44 Procter & Gamble 0.4 Johnson & Johnson 0.3 Kimberly-Clark 0.2 0.1 0 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006 Procter & Gamble 0.52 0.52 0.54 Johnson & Johnson 0.50 0.46 0.44 Kimberly-Clark 0.73 0.66 0.64 Source: Data and Chart constructed from each company’s 10-K Annual Report 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 45 of 87
  46. 46. Financial Strength Conclusion: As an investor, I would like to see P&G work to become more liquid and slightly more conservative in their use of debt to finance the organization. JNJ again is the benchmark to compare against. JNJ has a more liquid balance sheet and has no concern in covering interest owed. Although, P&G is not as strong as JNJ, P&G is not leveraged as much as KMB. 2.1.5 Dividend Analysis Figure 18 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 46 of 87
  47. 47. Dividend Rate and Yield Ratio 5.00% 4.08% 4.00% 3.28% 2.73% Procter & Gamble 3.00% 2.40% 1.76% 1.96% Johnson & Johnson 2.00% Kimberly-Clark 1.00% 0.00% Div idend Rate Dividend Yield Dividend Payout Ratio 70.00% 60. 56 % 60.00% 46 .41 % 50.00% 4 1.7 6% Proc ter & Gamble 40.00% Johnson & Johnson 30.00% Kimberly-Clark 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% D ividend Payout Ratio Dividend Dividend Payout Dividend Rate Yield Ratio Procter & Gamble 1.76% 2.73% 46.41% Johnson & Johnson 1.96% 3.28% 41.76% Kimberly-Clark 2.40% 4.08% 60.56% Source: Data and Chart constructed from Key Financials MSN Money and Finance AOL Dividend Analysis Conclusion: All three companies pay a reasonable dividend yield. One can assume that since P&G’s yield is lower and growth rate higher than peers (as identified above) that P&G is investing its earnings back into the organization. KMB 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 47 of 87
  48. 48. which has a high Debt to Asset ratio is choosing to pay its shareholders rather than fund its operation. JNJ appears to be a healthy blend between the two. 2.1.6 Management Efficiency Analysis Figure 19 Management Efficiency 120 100 80 Pro cter & G amble 60 Johnson & Johnson 40 Kim berly-Clark 20 0 Days in Inventory Avg. Return on Return on Return on In ventory Turnover Collection Equit y (pe r As se ts I nvested Period share) Ca pital Return on Avg. Equity Return Return on Days in Inventory Collection (per on Invested Inventory Turnover Period share) Assets Capital Procter & Gamble 75.48 4.84 38.35 17.62 10.24 13.85 Johnson & Johnson 99.62 3.66 75.29 30.22 15.98 24.68 Kimberly-Clark 67.12 5.44 49.31 37.35 9.82 16.09 Source: Data and Chart constructed from Finance AOL and each company’s 10-K annual report Management Efficiency Conclusion: Although P&G is not the lagging in all measurements, they are behind in return on equity. JNJ has a strong return due to the strength of their operation. KMB has chosen to limit the shares outstanding and finance a large percentage of the organization; as a result their return on equity is high. P&G is a solid performer in the middle of the pack and could use its peers to benchmark against. 2.1.7 Stock Price Analysis According to MorningStar.com Procter & Gamble stock opened at $57.37 on October 13, 2009. Procter & Gamble’s stock price closed at $57.26. By the end of the 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 48 of 87
  49. 49. trading day P&G had a volume of 11.28 million shares and a 52wk range is $43.93 to $66.82 as per figure below. Figure 20 Source: http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Procter_%26_Gamble_Company_(PG)/WikiChart MorningStar.com also reported that Kimberly-Clark’s stock opened at $59.38 on October 13, 2009. KMB’s stock price closed at $59.01. By the end of the trading day KMB had a volume of 1.81 million shares and a 52wk range is $43.05 to $62.05 as per figure below. Figure 21 Source: http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Kimberly-Clark_(KMB)/WikiChart?ref=topnav Johnson & Johnson’s stock price opened at $60.92, on October 13, 2009. JNJ’s stock price closed at $61.01. By the end of the trading day JNJ had a volume of 23.50 million shares and a 52wk range is $46.25 to $63.01 as per figure below. Figure 22 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 49 of 87
  50. 50. Source: http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/JOHNSON_%26_JOHNSON_(JNJ)/WikiChart Stock Price Analysis: JNJ has the largest market capitalization of the three and appears to be a more liquid asset (since the trading volume is significantly more). Based on the analysis performed above, one would expect JNJ to demand a higher stock price and the other two close behind. Also, based on KMB highly leveraged position, one would expect its stock price to be more volatile than PG, and based on this one day snap shot, this hypothesis holds true. 2.1.8 Summary of Financial Analysis P&G’s stock price in relation to its peers sums up all the financial ratios in comparison to KMB and JNJ. While PG has certain strong ratios, PG is not an industry leader. JNJ is the most financially sound of the three companies and KMB has a higher Owner’s equity return (but are more risky due to leveraging). PG is a solid blend that is demonstrating strong growth compared to its peers, and appears to be a solid value play for investors. 2.2.0 Strategic Analysis Strategic analysis consists of measuring the strengths and weaknesses of a company's position. There are a number of tools or methods used as the foundation for strategic analysis of a business. Understanding and analyzing all these factors is crucial to developing current strengths into competitive advantages over competition and improving certain weaknesses that hinder a company's efficiency and growth. An organization's core competencies should be focused on satisfying customer needs or 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 50 of 87
  51. 51. preferences in order to achieve above average returns. This is done through Business- level strategies. Business level strategy is an integrated and coordinated set of commitments and actions a firm uses to gain a competitive advantage by utilizing its core competencies in specific product markets. 2.2.1 Current Business Level Strategy P&G is a global manufacturer and marketer of consumer products. The company markets more than 300 brands in over 180 countries spanning Americas, Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and Asian region. The company is currently organized into three separate Global Business Units (GBUs. The three GBUs are: Beauty, Health and Well- Being, and Household care. Figure 23 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 51 of 87
  52. 52. Procter & Gamble Health and Household Beauty GBU W ell-B eing Care GBU GB U Sn acks, Coffee, Fabric Care and Baby Care and Beau ty Groo ming H ealth Care and Pet Care H ome Care Family Care A riel H ead & Braun Acto nel Dawn Bo un ty Shou ld ers Fusion Always Iams Down y Charmin Olay Gillette Crest Prin gles D uracell Pampers Pan tene Wella M ach 3 O ral-B Gain T id e Source: Organizational Chart constructed from P&G’s 10-K annual report 2.2.2 Elements of Company’s Strategy P&G new CEO Bob McDonald, who assumed office in July, has laid out P&G new company strategy which will be centered on company values and a sense of purpose. McDonald said that P&G will “focus on touching and improving more consumers' lives in more parts of the world... more completely." McDonald calls P&G's purpose the most consistent factor in a 171-year history of the company. He said P&G will continue to provide branded products of superior quality 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 52 of 87
  53. 53. and value that improve the lives of the world's consumers, now and for generations to come. He believes that as a result of P&G’s new company strategy will cause consumers to reward P&G with leadership sales, profit and value creations, and “allowing our people, our shareholders, and the communities in which we live and work to prosper." (Kanter, 2009) 2.2.3 Components of Company’s Business Level Strategy Efforts to build competitive advantage In an effort to continue its global leadership position and create an additional competitive advantage, P&G has partnered with Cisco System to help develop its next phase in supply chain management “Smart Packaging”. “Smart Packaging,” is a highly innovative system that will enable the company to look at its supply chain from a consumer’s perspective. Smart Packaging will embed a chip into every item in the store, providing more information than today's standard barcodes. By creating an easy way to track products through the factory, on delivery trucks, and in the stores, this innovation will dramatically increase supply chain efficiency. Smart-chip technology will result in fewer out-of-stocks, greater on-time delivery, better products, and an enhanced user experience for consumers (Procter & Gamble, 2002). Collaborative partnerships and strategic alliance P&G will outsource its worldwide print operations to Xerox. This collaborative partnership with Xerox will allow P&G to reduce operational costs by an estimated 20-25 percent. The five-year services contract calls for Xerox to manage P&G's print shops, offices and home-based work settings. Working with Xerox, P&G has the opportunity to deliver substantial sustainability benefits in addition to cost savings and increased user 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 53 of 87
  54. 54. satisfaction and reliability. P&G predicts it will reduce print-related power usage by 30 percent and paper consumption by 20-30 percent annually. (Xerox.com) Distribution P&G is currently working with i2 Technologies to support the physical distribution of its North American operations. Utilizing the i2 Freight Matrix transportation solution, P&G is working to drive efficiency across its finished product logistics through improved carrier selection, event management and dashboard reporting. Human Resource Strategy Procter and Gamble view their more than 138,000 employees as the most important asset of the company and encourage them to have the same values and principles as the company. All employees of Procter and Gamble are considered leaders and encouraged to take responsibility to do the best that they can while meeting business needs, bettering the system and helping those around them (PG.com). According to P&G’s 2009 Annual Report, its human resource strategy is built of five core values: I. Hire the Best P&G claim that almost 500,000 people apply for P&G jobs every year and that they normally only hire less than 1% of those applicants. P&G believes that it attracts top talent because of its reputation as a great company for current and future leaders II. Challenge P&G People from Day One P&G has learned that “there’s no substitute for hands-on experience when it comes to leadership development.” To help develop this leadership P&G has created consequential responsibilities for every employee. Its assignments typically demand collaboration inside and outside the Company, disciplined project management and the need to be in touch with consumers, retail customers and other external stakeholders. III. Business and Functional Leaders Actively Recruit, Teach and Coach At P&G, leadership by example starts from the top. P&G’s Chairman of the Board and former CEO A.G. Lafley, Corporate Officers, Presidents and Functional Officers recruit on college campuses and teach in their executive education programs. These 10/18/2009 Procter & Gamble Page 54 of 87

×