South Africa Mutual Evaluation Report Ratings

Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures in South Africa - Mutual Evaluation Report – October 2021 1
Anti-money laundering and counter-
terrorist financing (AML/CFT)
measures in South Africa
Fourth Round Mutual Evaluation
Key findings, ratings and priority actions
October 2021
http://www.fatf-gafi.org/publications/mutualevaluations/documents/south-africa-2021.html

Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures in South Africa - Mutual Evaluation Report – October 2021
Ratings – Effectiveness (1/3)
2
Immediate outcome of an effective system to combat money
laundering (ML) and terrorist financing (TF)
Extent to
which
South Africa
has achieved
this objective
1. ML and TF risks are understood and, where appropriate,
actions co-ordinated domestically to combat ML and TF
Moderate
2. International co-operation delivers appropriate information,
financial intelligence, and evidence, and facilitates action
against criminals and their assets
Moderate
3. Supervisors appropriately supervise, monitor and regulate
financial institutions and designated non-financial
businesses and professions (DNFBPs) for compliance with
AML/CFT requirements commensurate with their risks.
Moderate
4. Financial institutions and DNFBPs adequately apply AML/CFT
preventive measures commensurate with their risks, and
report suspicious transactions.
Moderate

Extent to
which
South Africa
has achieved
this objective
5. Legal persons and arrangements are prevented from misuse
for money laundering or terrorist financing, and information
on their beneficial ownership is available to competent
authorities without impediments
Low
6. Financial intelligence and all other relevant information are
appropriately used by competent authorities for money
laundering and terrorist financing investigations.
Moderate
7. Money laundering offences and activities are investigated
and offenders are prosecuted and subject to effective,
proportionate and dissuasive sanctions
Moderate
8. Proceeds and instrumentalities of crime are confiscated. Moderate

Extent to
which
South Africa
has achieved
this objective
9. Terrorist financing offences and activities are investigated
and persons who finance terrorism are prosecuted and
subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.
Low
10. Terrorists, terrorist organisations and terrorist financiers are
prevented from raising, moving and using funds, and from
abusing the non-profit sector.
Low
11. Persons and entities involved in the proliferation of weapons
of mass destruction are prevented from raising, moving and
using funds, consistent with the relevant United Nations
Security Council Resolutions.
Moderate

Ratings – Effectiveness
October 2021
0
0
8
3
High
Substantial
Moderate
Low

6-Oct-21
6
Ratings – technical compliance
(1/5)
AML/CFT POLICIES AND COORDINATION
1. Assessing risks & applying a risk-based approach PartiParParPar Partially compliant
2. National cooperation and coordination PartiParParPar Partially compliant
MONEY LAUNDERING AND CONFISCATION
3. Money laundering offence LargLarLarLar Largely Compliant
4. Confiscation and provisional measures LargLarLarLar Largely Compliant
TERRORIST FINANCING AND FINANCING OF PROLIFERATION
5. Terrorist financing offence PartiParParPar Partially compliant
6. Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism & terrorist
financing Non No No No Non compliant
7. Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation PartiParParPar Partially compliant
8. Non-profit organisations Non No No No Non compliant

6-Oct-21
7
(2/5)
PREVENTIVE MEASURES
9. Financial institution secrecy laws LargLarLarLar Largely compliant
Customer due diligence and record keeping
10. Customer due diligence PartiParParPar Partially compliant
11. Record keeping LargLarLarLar Largely compliant
Additional measures for specific customers and activities
12. Politically exposed persons Non No No No Non compliant
13. Correspondent banking LargLarLarLar Largely compliant
14. Money or value transfer services PartiParParPar Partially compliant
15. New technologies Non No No No Non compliant
16. Wire transfers LargLarLarLar Largely compliant

6-Oct-21
8
(3/5)
PREVENTIVE MEASURES (continued)
Reliance, Controls and Financial Groups
17. Reliance on third parties Non compliant
18. Internal controls and foreign branches and subsidiaries PartiParParPar Partially compliant
19. Higher-risk countries LargLarLarLar Largely compliant
Reporting of suspicious transactions
20. Reporting of suspicious transactions LargLarLarLar Largely compliant
21. Tipping-off and confidentiality ComCo Co Co Compliant
Designated non-financial Businesses and Professions (DNFBPs)
22. DNFBPs: Customer due diligence PartiParParPar Partially compliant
23. DNFBPs: Other measures PartiParParPar Partially compliant

6-Oct-21
9
(4/5)
TRANSPARENCY AND BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF LEGAL PERSONS
AND ARRANGEMENTS
24. Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons PartiParParPar Partially compliant
25. Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal arrangements PartiParParPar Partially compliant
POWERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND
OTHER INSTITUTIONAL MEASURES
Regulation and Supervision
26. Regulation and supervision of financial institutions PartiParParPar Partially compliant
27. Powers of supervisors PartiParParPar Partially compliant
28. Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs PartiParParPar Partially compliant
Operational and Law Enforcement
29. Financial intelligence units LargLarLarLar Largely compliant
30. Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities ComCo Co Co Compliant
31. Powers of law enforcement and investigative authorities ComCo Co Co Compliant
32. Cash couriers PartiParParPar Partially compliant

6-Oct-21
10
(5/5)
POWERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND
OTHER INSTITUTIONAL MEASURES (continued)
General Requirements
33. Statistics LargLarLarLar Largely compliant
34. Guidance and feedback LargLarLarLar Largely compliant
Sanctions
35. Sanctions LargLarLarLar Largely compliant
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION
36. International instruments LargLarLarLar Largely compliant
37. Mutual legal assistance LargLarLarLar Largely compliant
38. Mutual legal assistance: freezing and confiscation LargLarLarLar Largely compliant
39. Extradition LargLarLarLar Largely compliant
40. Other forms of international cooperation LargLarLarLar Largely compliant

1
October 202
3
17
15
5
Compliant
Largely compliant
Partially compliant
Non compliant

Key findings
 The main domestic money laundering (ML) crime threats are
consistently understood by the key authorities but the understanding of
their relative scale, ML vulnerabilities, and the threats from foreign
predicates is limited. Understanding of terrorist financing (TF) risks is
underdeveloped and uneven. Some ML risks are being mitigated but
some significant risks remain to be addressed. TF risks are not being
adequately addressed.
 South Africa has suffered from a sustained period of “State capture”,1
which helped to generate substantial corruption proceeds and
undermined key agencies with roles to combat such activity.
Government initiatives from 2018/19 were starting to address the
situation as of the onsite, including by replacing key staff and increasing
resources at key law enforcement and judicial agencies.
 The Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC) effectively produces operational
financial intelligence that Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs) use to help
investigate predicate crimes and trace criminal assets, but the LEAs lack
the skills and resources to proactively investigate ML or TF.
12
1
October 202

Key findings
 A reasonable number of ML convictions is being achieved but only partly
consistent with South Africa’s risk profile. Cases largely concern self-laundering
and few cases of third-party ML and foreign predicate offenses are prosecuted.
The proactive identification and investigation of ML networks and professional
enablers is not really occurring. Most ML convictions relate to fraud cases and
there are fewer investigations and successful prosecutions relating to other
high-risk crimes. In particular, ML cases relating to “State capture” have not
been sufficiently pursued.
 South Africa has achieved some good results proactively pursuing confiscation
of criminal proceeds, particularly using civil forfeiture powers but has had less
success recovering assets from “State capture” and proceeds which have been
moved to other countries. Some recent cases suggest that this situation is
improving.
 Use of cash is prevalent in South Africa and it has been assessed as high risk
for ML and TF, including cross-border movement. Detecting and recovering
cash proceeds of crime remains challenging and efforts to detect and
confiscate falsely or undeclared cross-border movement of currency needs
substantial improvement.
October 2021
13

Key findings
 South Africa has convicted one person for TF since the last ME and was
prosecuting one case as of the onsite which is inconsistent with its
significant TF risks. A conservative approach to classifying politically
motivated acts of violence as terrorism negatively impacts the
investigation and prosecution of potential terrorist financiers. Targeted
Financial Sanctions (TFS) are not used to any great extent to fight
terrorism; and implementation of United Nations Security Council
Resolutions (UNSCRs) for TF has not occurred since 2017.
 Law enforcement faces challenges to readily obtain accurate and
updated beneficial ownership (BO) information about companies and
trusts adequate to enable effective investigation of ML and TF.
14
1
October 202

Key findings
15
1
October 202
 Larger banks are more developed at understanding their ML risks
and implementing mitigating measures commensurate with those
risks. Most smaller Financial Institutions (FIs) and Designated Non-
Financial Businesses and Professions (DNFBPs) are focused on
compliance, not on identifying and understanding risks. TF risk is
understood by the private sector to some extent. Overall, the risk-
based approach (RBA) is inadequately implemented. Basic
customer due diligence (CDD) is applied by many accountable
institutions (AIs) satisfactorily but BO requirements only to some
extent. Larger banks and Authorized Dealers with Limited Authority
(ADLAs) meet suspicious reporting obligations to a large extent, but
some high-risk sectors rarely report. The potentially high-risk
sectors of Dealers in Precious Metals and Stone (DPMS) and
Company Service Providers (CSPs) are not AML/CFT regulated, save
for a general reporting obligation, as is also the case for Virtual
Asset Service Providers (VASPs).

Key findings
16
October 2021
 Risk-based AML/CFT regulation and supervision is relatively new. Most
supervisory activities occur for banks and ADLAs but none of the
supervision of FIs or DNFBPs uses a proper RBA. Inspections in other
sectors are too infrequent and focus on the presence of basic controls not
the soundness of AML/CFT programs. The FIC is a key coordinator amongst
supervisors and provides a wide range of well-regarded guidance. Market
entry controls to screen out criminality need fundamental improvements.
 South Africa provides constructive mutual legal assistance (MLA) which has
helped to resolve some criminal cases in other countries, but it is
sometimes slow. Seeking international cooperation in investigations is not
a priority, inconsistent with South Africa’s risk profile, and following up on
requests made needs major improvement.
 Since April 2019, South Africa has implemented TFS for proliferation
financing (PF) fairly well, most of the time without delay, but some major
improvements are needed, as the private sector’s understanding is
uneven, and supervision of PF-related obligations is new.

Priority Actions for South Africa
to strengthen its AML/CFT System
 Develop policies to address higher ML/TF risks for: (i) BO; (ii) use of cash
and its cross-border movement (physically and through illegal MVTS);
(iii) third-party ML; (iv) foreign predicate crimes; (v) and TF. Ensure that
all FIs, DNFBPs and VASPs are subject to AML/CFT obligations unless
they pose proven low risks.
 Analyze how to substantially improve the availability of information on
domestic PEPs and then support AIs to identify such PEPs. Remove the
time limit in the definition of PEP in the FIC Act.
 Provide the SAPS Directorate for Priority Crimes Investigations
(SAPS:DPCI) with more staff, especially financial investigators and
forensic accountants, so that it can better use financial intelligence and
place more emphasis on proactively identifying and investigating ML
cases, particularly high level and complex cases such as those related to
“State capture” and others involving third party laundering, foreign
predicates, ML networks, and professional enablers.
17
October 2021

Priority Actions for South Africa to
strengthen its AML/CFT System
 Keep prioritizing efforts to stem the flow of and recover assets
from “State capture”, including assets transferred to countries
outside of South Africa, until satisfactory results are achieved.
 Actively seek formal and timely MLA for ML, associated predicate
offenses and TF that have transnational aspects and follow-up on
such requests, including proactively pursuing “State capture”
requests through all available channels.
 Make major enhancements to the effectiveness of measures at
borders to detect and seize illicit cash flows and to identify and
address unlicensed cross-border MVTS.
 Greatly improve ability to proactively identify TF activity and
reconsider the policy of not pursuing the domestic designations as
a tool to counter terrorism or TF.
 Revise the TFS legal framework to address the major shortcomings
identified in R.6 and create robust procedures for implementing UN
listings without delay.
18
October 2021

 Establish much better mechanisms to collect BO information about
companies and trusts, and train relevant LEAs about complex
structures and how they can be abused for ML/TF purposes.
 South Africa should ensure that AIs adequately implement an RBA,
including through better assessing and understanding their
inherent risks and refining and implementing their risk
management and compliance programs (RMCPs) to mitigate their
risks. The authorities should provide better guidance on these
matters and on major ML/TF risks such as corruption.
 Supervisors should improve how they conduct risk-based AML/CFT
supervision, including by improving their understanding of inherent
ML/TF risks at sector and institutional levels and using that to
prioritize their supervisory activities.
October 2021
19

 Ensure the securities sector, attorneys, estate agents, TSPs,
CSPs, and DPMS are supervised or monitored for AML/CFT
commensurate with their risk profiles, by increasing
supervisory resources and closing gaps in sector coverage.
October 2021
20

South Africa Mutual Evaluation Report Ratings

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to South Africa Mutual Evaluation Report Ratings

Similar to South Africa Mutual Evaluation Report Ratings (20)

More from FATF - Financial Action Task Force

More from FATF - Financial Action Task Force (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

South Africa Mutual Evaluation Report Ratings