SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 75
Total Quality Management
Six Sigma for Rosette Printers




                                 1
2
PROJECT TITLE
Unacceptable job rejection rate for books
          SUBMITTED BY
          Zahra Baray (0935220)
     Shaikh Faizan Ahmed (0935117)
          Hira Hayat (0935190)
       Syed Anser Ahmed (0935121)
     Awais Ahmed Memon (0935103)
    Syed Muhammad Imran (0935122)
         Raza Soomro (0935127)
         Sohail Akhter (0935226)
          SUBMITTED TO
       Ma‟am Memoona Masood
                                            3
“Quality is never an accident; it is always the
   result of high intention, sincere effort,
intelligent direction and skillful execution; it
     represents the wise choice of many
                 alternatives. ”
                              -William A. Foster



                                                   4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY




                    5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – Rosette Printers
  Rosette Printers, established in 1980, is a printing set up in Karachi catering

to a wide customer base including corporates.

  Their clientele include One Potato Two Potato, OUP, Mohatta Palace,

IUCN, GunSmoke etc

  Rosette Printers has been having some operational problems related to

quality issues which are significantly impacting the bottom line.




                                                                                    6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Introduction
  Printing is a very detail-oriented, demanding process and quality printing is

only possible if the entire process is fool proof.

  In case of non compliance of quality checks at the correct stages and due

to negligence by the employees, the job is spoilt and the company needs to

make a run for re-printing that adds to costs, efforts and difficulty in meeting

deadlines.

  On the other hand, these defects lead to reprinting of the entire job that

burdens the financials of the company.
                                                                                   7
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – Six Sigma
  The CEO of Rosette Printers wanted help regarding the clear identification

of these problems and the resolution steps in order to arrest the runaway costs

associated with these operational issues.

  The entire project has been diagnosed using Six Sigma concepts. Preliminary

information based on data confirms that approximately 30% of the books are

being rejected due to quality issues.



                                                                                  8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – Key Issues
The key problem areas were identified as;

       Out of registration printing

       Ink related issues

       Picture resolution issues

       Human errors

       Unnecessary increase in overall costs and wastage

       Plate making issues


                                                           9
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – Expected Results
  The solutions proposed would improve the overall business process

(especially printing)

  Reduce cost incurrence

  Increase the overall efficiency of the entire printing process




                                                                      10
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – Expected Benefits
  Greater operational excellence

  Customer satisfaction

  Quality what it should be




                                        11
DEFINE PHASE




               12
DEFINE – Context
Defects leading to reprinting - Current issues:

  Quality printing is essential for the success of any printed material and

  this could only be done if the entire process is fool proof.

  These defects lead to reprinting of the entire job that burdens the

  financials of the company.

  In resolution to the above stated conditions we aim to use DMAIC to

  improve the overall printing process to gain customer satisfaction and

  confidence in our procedures, making quality what it should be.             13
DEFINE – Context
Tools used in Define Phase are:

  CTQ Specifications

  Project Charter

  Process Map

  Stakeholder Analysis




                                        14
DEFINE – Project Charter
Project Title: Unacceptable job rejection rate for books                              Business: Printing Industry

                    Business Case                                        Problem Statement
30%*of the books are rejected due to quality issues The key problems faced are:
   ·Significant impact on the financials of the business. · Out of registration printing
   ·Significant wastage of resources and unnecessary      · Ink related issues
   cost incurrence.                                       · Picture resolution issues
   ·In order for optimum business performance the
                                                          · Human errors
   rejection rate needs to come down to zero. This
   would result in reduced wastage, on time delivery      · Increase in overall costs and wastage
   and repeat orders.                                     · Plate making issues

                         Project Scope                                             Goal Statement (Measurable)
            In scope                       Out of Scope                 Internal Customer (CEO):
          Book printing                  Printing of Cards,                · CTQ: Reduce the 30% rejection rate to 1% of the
                                        Calendars, Magazines,              books printed
                                             Envelopes
                                                                        Business:
                                                                           · Eliminate human error by 100%
                                                                           · To avoid costs and effort due to double printing
                                                                           by streamlining the printing process

*The actual rejection rate for books was 28% but we have kept it 30%.
                                                                                                                                15
DEFINE – Project Charter
Project Title: Unacceptable job rejection rate for books              Business: Printing Industry

      Project Plan/ Milestones / Deliverables                        Roles of Team Members
                                                               Name              Role       % of    time spent
                                                         Memoona Masood Project Coordinator
         Define             2nd Mar – 7th Mar 2010           Zahra Baray    Project Manager         50%
        Measure             9th Mar – 12th Mar 2010     Shaikh Faizan Ahmed  Team Member            30%
                                                             Hira Hayat      Team Member            30%
        Analyze            13th Mar – 14th Mar 2010
                                                         Syed Anser Ahmed    Team Member            30%
        Improve             16th Mar – 21st Mar 2010    Awais Ahmed Memon    Team Member            30%
        Control            22nd Mar – 25th Mar 2010          Syed Imran      Team Member            30%
                                                            Raza Soomro      Team Member            30%
                                                            Sohail Akhter    Team Member            30%

                   Projected Benefits                               Barriers/ Support required
Internal Customer (CEO): Reduction of cost              Barriers:
incurrence                                                 · Process House
Business: Increase efficiency of the printing process      · Production Manager
so that defects are reduced to 1%                          · Purchase Manager
                                                           · Assistant to Machine Operators
                                                           · Machine Operators
                                                           · Plate Maker
                                                        Support:
                                                           · Support needed through buy in from everyone.
                                                                                                                 16
DEFINE – VOC to CTQ
                                   CTQ (specific
    Voice of the Customer          requirements)
                                                       CTQ Measure/Metric
            (VOC)                Translating VOC
#                                                      How are you measuring                    Current State                   Target
    What is the customer            into specific
                                                        your CTQ identified
          telling us?            requirements that
                                 we can work with
                                                           CEO measures the
                                                                                          Complains regarding out of
  Out of registration printing                         authentication of the final                                          98% Authentic
                                Accurate printing on                                  registration are approximately 50%
1 (Unclear Text & Picture)                             print by comparing it with                                             Print Job
                                     every book.                                              of all rejected books.
                                                       dummy print (approved by
                                                            client at first hand)
                                                       CEO measures the quality
   Picture resolution issues                                                             Blurred pictures are reported
                                                         of the Printed pictures                                              100% Clear
  (Shaded Pictures, Pictures Proper & clear picture                                   causing huge set back to quality of
2                                                      comparing it with dummy                                                  Pictures
       looks double,etc)              resolution                                      job accounting approximately 15%
                                                       print that was approved by
                                                                                                of complains
                                                                   client.
                                                      Production manager sets the     Approximately 25% of complains
     Concreteness of ink       Proper volume of ink
                                                        specification of ink to be    reported are due to improper use      99% Consistent
3 (Density & unnecessary        and same quality of
                                                      used for specific job keeping   of ink & lack of consistent quality   quality of print
             lines)              print for entire job
                                                        in view the dummy print.                   of print
                               Ensure that Plates use Purchase manager ensures
                                                                                      Approximately 10% of complains 100% Quality Plate
                               for Printing are as per the quality Plate has been
4     Inadequate Plates                                                                results due to use of inadequate   usage
                                the required quality. used with join collaboration
                                                                                                     plates
                                                                 with CEO.



                                                                                                                                           17
DEFINE – Process Mapping




                           18
DEFINE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis
                  Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude,
                            from supportive to opposed.
                                   Neutral
     List of               Moder                                                                 Level of
                  Strongly        (indiffere Strongly Moderately
 Stakeholders by            ately                                          Reason for           Resistance
                  Supporti           nt or Against/ Against/                                                          Actions
dept / Individual          Suppo                                           Resistance          (High, Med,
                     ve           undecide Opposed Opposed
     names                  rtive                                                                 Low)
                                      d)
                                                                                                                   The complaints are
                                                                        CEO completely                            internal and are very
                                                                         agrees with the                      critical in nature and this
                                                                        suggestions being                     has lead to the increasing
 Shaheedullah                                                            provided by the                       rejection rate of the job;
Baray (CEO of         x                                               Project Team. As he is      Low        the business is facing huge
the Company)                                                            the one, who has                      overhead costs and facing
                                                                        identified the key                      losses. Hence a detailed
                                                                         problems at the                      Six Sigma Project is being
                                                                            company                              implemented upon the
                                                                                                                        company
                                                                                                                   After the complete
                                                                                                               analysis of the rejection
                                                                      He is very supportive                     rate of the jobs, Ahsan
                                                                        and helpful as he                           wants the urgent
    AHSAN
                                                                      wants the company to                   resolution of the problem
  (Production                 x                                                                   Med
                                                                      earn more profits and                  and this can be eliminated
   Manager)
                                                                      provide better quality                   by strict Quality control
                                                                        to the customers                         and Quality Assurance
                                                                                                              activities on each step of
                                                                                                                         printing
                                                                                                                                       19
DEFINE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis
                  Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude,
                            from supportive to opposed.
                                   Neutral
     List of               Moder                                                                 Level of
                  Strongly        (indiffere Strongly Moderately
 Stakeholders by            ately                                         Reason for            Resistance
                  Supporti           nt or Against/ Against/                                                         Actions
dept / Individual          Suppo                                          Resistance           (High, Med,
                     ve           undecide Opposed Opposed
     names                  rtive                                                                 Low)
                                      d)
                                                                                                                  Since his job is to
                                                                                                             purchase the raw material
                                                                                                                such as ink and paper
                                                                      He is indifferent and                   from the market, he will
   ASHRAF
                                                                       fears that his work                     have to ensure that the
   (Purchase                           x                                                          Med
                                                                      might increase due to                  best raw materials would
   Manager)
                                                                               this.                             be purchases. So the
                                                                                                               reason of the rejection
                                                                                                                rate would not be the
                                                                                                               quality of paper or ink
                                                                           They are not
                                                                        supportive of the
                                                                                                                 Both the machine
 HAMEED &                                                              TQM philosophy as
                                                                                                             operators will have to be
  RIZWAN                                                                they feel that their
                                                 x                                                High       trained on quality control
  (Machine                                                            expertise is doubted.
                                                                                                             measures so that the need
  Operators)                                                             There will be all
                                                                                                             for reprinting is reduced.
                                                                       checks on them and
                                                                      they feel intimidated.




                                                                                                                                     20
DEFINE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis
                  Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude,
                            from supportive to opposed.
                                   Neutral
     List of               Moder                                                                   Level of
                  Strongly        (indiffere Strongly Moderately
 Stakeholders by            ately                                          Reason for             Resistance
                  Supporti           nt or Against/ Against/                                                            Actions
dept / Individual          Suppo                                           Resistance            (High, Med,
                     ve           undecide Opposed Opposed
     names                  rtive                                                                   Low)
                                      d)

                                                                                                                They will ensure that the
                                                                      They are indifferent as                  whole printing process will
  WAQAR &
                                                                      they say it is not their                    run smoothly and the
FAZAL (Assistant
                                       x                              job to control quality.       Med            machines would be
   Machine
                                                                       They just do as they                    cleaned after each job and
  Operators)
                                                                             are told.                         no any technical cause of
                                                                                                                  print rejection occurs

                                                                                                               Waqar will ensure that the
                                                                       Supportive towards                         plates would be made
WAQAR AHMED                                                            the idea, following                     error free and they will not
                              x                                                                     Low
 (Plate Maker)                                                        proper procedures of                       cause any problems of
                                                                          plate making                          double printing or color
                                                                                                                         spillage




                                                                                                                                        21
DEFINE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis
                  Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude,
                            from supportive to opposed.
                                   Neutral
     List of               Moder                                                                  Level of
                  Strongly        (indiffere Strongly Moderately
 Stakeholders by            ately                                          Reason for            Resistance
                  Supporti           nt or Against/ Against/                                                           Actions
dept / Individual          Suppo                                           Resistance           (High, Med,
                     ve           undecide Opposed Opposed
     names                  rtive                                                                  Low)
                                      d)
                                                                                                                Ibrahim will ensure the
                                                                                                               whole die cutting process
                                                                      Ibrahim is supportive                   to run smoothly and error
                                                                      towards the idea and                      free. He will make sure
IBRAHIM (Die
                                       x                               follows the standard        Low         that no any rejection rate
   Cutter)
                                                                         practices of die                      occurs due to the cutting.
                                                                             cutting                          He will ensure the quality
                                                                                                                assurance in die cutting
                                                                                                                        process
                                                                                                               Mehfooz will ensure the
                                                                                                              proper binding of the jobs
                                                                       Supportive towards
                                                                                                              and will be involved in the
                                                                        the idea, so as to
  MEHFOOZ                                                                                                     Quality control process. If
                                       x                              maintain a better level      Low
   (Binder)                                                                                                      he will find any miss
                                                                        of service in the
                                                                                                               printings during binding
                                                                        printing industry
                                                                                                              he will report to the higher
                                                                                                                      management


                                                                                                                                       22
DEFINE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis
                  Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude,
                            from supportive to opposed.
                                   Neutral
     List of               Moder                                                                   Level of
                  Strongly        (indiffere Strongly Moderately
 Stakeholders by            ately                                          Reason for             Resistance
                  Supporti           nt or Against/ Against/                                                           Actions
dept / Individual          Suppo                                           Resistance            (High, Med,
                     ve           undecide Opposed Opposed
     names                  rtive                                                                   Low)
                                      d)



                                                                       Supportive towards                      These persons will assist
OMAIR, LIAQAT
                                                                      the idea, as their tasks                 Mehfooz to ensure error
  & FAIZY
                                       x                              are not the main ones         Low        free binding of the jobs
  (Assistant
                                                                        that would hinder                      and to perform Quality
   Binders)
                                                                              quality                              control activities




                                                                                                                                       23
MEASURE PHASE




                24
MEASURE - Context
Tools used in Measure Phase are:

 Data Collection Plan

 Histograms

 As-Is Process




                                      25
MEASURE – Data Collection Plan
                                                         Data Source and
 Performance Measure        Operational Definition                                Sample Size
                                                            Location
                          The book printing process
                                                         • CEO
                            from the time the client
   Unacceptable job                                      • Production Manager
                         gives the job till the time the                         Last 6 months
rejection rate for books                                 • Paper Suppliers
                            job is printed should be
                                                         • Process House
                                   defect free

                                                                                Other Data that
                               When will data be        How will data be
Who will collect the data                                                          should be
                                  collected               collected
                                                                                    collected
                                                                                 Rejection from
                                                                                various types of
                            After completion of every
          CEO                                                Manually           defects, total jobs
                              job and at month end
                                                                                 of books each
                                                                                     month


                                                                                                      26
MEASURE – Histograms
                         Books          Calendars Cards                           Others                 Total
     September            12                0       3                                0                     15
     October              13                0       0                                5                     18
     November             13                0       5                                3                     21
     December             16                7       1                                2                     26
     January              15                1       3                                1                     20
     February             14                1       1                                4                     20
     Total                83                9      13                               15                    120

Histogram 1: Types of jobs printed by the company per month
     30
                                                                        26
     25
                                                    21                                        20                   20
     20                           18
                   15                                    16                  15                     14
     15   12            13             13

     10                                                       7
                              5             5                                                                  4
     5         3                                3                                     3
                                                                  1 2             1       1              1 1
     0
           September     October       November           December                January            February


               Books         Calenders               Cards               Others                    Total
                                                                                                                        27
MEASURE – Histograms
                              Total Jobs of Books
                    September          12
                    October            13
                    November           13
                    December           16
                    January            15
                    February           14
                    Total              83
Histogram 2: Total number of jobs of Books in 6 months
  100
                                                                         83
   80
   60
   40
   20      12         13        13         16        15         14

    0
        September   October   November   December   January   February   Total


                               Total Jobs of Books
                                                                                 28
WORKING
 Total jobs = 120
 Total rejection= 40% of 120 = 48 rejected jobs
 Total books rejected out of the rejected jobs =
        48 * 48% = 23*
*(48% that we have taken as rounded off to 50%)

 Total books = 83
 Total rejection of books = 28%*
 Total books rejected= 83 * 28% = 23
*(28% that we have taken as rounded off to 30%)
MEASURE – Pie Chart for Rejection
                          Total Jobs - 120
                   15


            13                                        Total Jobs Books
                                                      Total Jobs Calenders
                                                      Total Jobs Cards
            9
                                                      Total Jobs Others

                                  83




                Total Rejection: 40% of 120 jobs = 48



                                                                    Books

                                          Books, 23                 Others
     Others, 25
                                             *48% of total jobs rejected
                                             accrues to books




                                                                             30
MEASURE – Histograms
                                  Rejected Jobs of Books
                        September            5
                        October              4
                        November             2
                        December             3
                        January              4
                        February             5
                        Total               23

Histogram 3: Total number of jobs of Books rejected in 6 months
       25                                                                     23
       20
       15
       10
               5           4                               4          5
       5                              2          3
       0
            September    October   November   December   January   February   Total


                                   Rejected Jobs of Books
                                                                                      31
MEASURE – Histograms
                             Total Jobs of Books             Rejected Jobs of Books
           September                  12                                5
           October                    13                                4
           November                   13                                2
           December                   16                                3
           January                    15                                4
           February                   14                                5
           Total                      83                               23

Histogram 4: Total number of jobs of Books and their rejection per month
           120
                                                                                    23
           100
            80
            60
            40                                                                      83
            20      5           4         2          3           4          5
                   12          13        13         16          15         14
             0
                 September   October   November   December     January   February   Total


                    Total Jobs of Books               Rejected Jobs of Books
                                                                                            32
MEASURE – Histograms
            Out of registration printing       Ink related issues   Plate related issues      Picture resolution issues   Total
September                2                             2                       0                           1               5
October                  2                             1                       0                           1               4
November                 1                             0                       0                           1               2
December                 2                             0                       1                           0               3
January                  2                             1                       1                           0               4
February                 3                             2                       0                           0               5
Total                   12                             6                       2                           3               23
                          Histogram 5: Type of defects per month
               12
               10
                 8           5                                                                         5
                 6                         4                                          4
                 4           1                                          3                              2
                                           1                                          1
                             2
                                           1               2            1             1
                 2                                         1                                           3
                             2             2                            2             2
                                                           1
                 0
                        September     October          November     December        January         February

                          Out of registration printing               Ink related issues
                          Plate related issues                       Picture resolution issues
                          Total                                                                                                   33
MEASURE - „As Is‟ Process




 Yes




                            34
Key Findings – Lessons Learned
The books printed by Rosette Printers are mostly rejected by their CEO due

to quality issues like out of registration printing, ink related issues, plate

making issues and picture resolution issues

The errors were caused by negligence and lack of skills of the staff.

Errors are identified once the book is printed and there is a need for back

working the process to find the source

There is no proper procedure followed to keep a check and balance on the

books printed that leads to blame game played by the staff.
                                                                                 35
Key Challenges
There is no proper database maintained of the number of jobs rejected and

the reason for their rejection.

Data has been estimated with the help of VOC.

No proper acceptance of the errors made by the respective personnel.

Proper monitoring and quality check will be needed at each stage.




                                                                            36
ANALYZE PHASE




                37
ANALYZE - Context
Tools used in Analyze Phase are:

 Pareto Chart

 Fishbone Diagram




                                      38
ANALYZE – Pareto Chart
Problem Type Out of registration printing Ink related issues Picture resolution issues Plate related issues
   Count                 12                        6                     3                       2
      %                 52%                      26%                   13%                     9%
Cumulative %            52%                      78%                   91%                    100%

        14                                                                                           120%
                      12                                                            100%
        12                                                     91%                                   100%
        10                                78%
                                                                                                     80%
         8
                     52%                    6                                                        60%
         6
                                                                                                     40%
         4                                                       3
                                                                                       2
         2                                                                                           20%

         0                                                                                           0%
              Out of registration   Ink related issues   Picture resolution   Plate related issues
                   printing                                    issues
                                           Count         Cumulative %
                                                                                                            39
ANALYZE – Fishbone Diagram




                             40
Data Analysis & Summary
Based on the Histogram, Fishbone Diagram and Brainstorming sessions, we

have ascertained that the root causes of the problems are :

 Lack of proper procedures and checks

 No proper training institute exists for the printing technicians so they fail

  to differentiate quality errors

 Since the machines are second hand, they tend to break down and their

  parts aren’t readily available

 Paper delivery can sometimes be the cause of printing defects as the

  paper is normally ordered on phone and not checked                              41
Plan for Improvement
Create a plan for improvement:

 Generating creative solutions ideas

 Analyzing the solution options and selecting the best alternative (s)

 Developing implementation plan

 Learning from the pilot test and implementing the solutions full-scale




                                                                          42
Proposal for Better Resolution of the Issue
In order to resolve the errors in the book printing process, we have decided

to appoint 2 quality inspectors. Their job description will include:

 Ensure that the paper specifications match with the paper delivered.

 Check for errors in film making by the Process House

 Ensure that the plates are not over/under exposed and are intact




                                                                               43
Proposal for Better Resolution of the Issue
 Make sure that the machine operators maintain the machine, clean it after

 every job, check the roller and keep a close eye for out of registration

 printing errors.

 Check the concreteness of ink prior to the entire printing of books with

 regular testing.




                                                                              44
IMPROVE PHASE




                45
IMPROVE – Context
  In order to improve the overall performance and resolve the issue at all levels

it is important to evaluate the different alternatives or options that spring from

brainstorming. It is also essential to understand how these alternatives would

help meet the set target along with specifying the criteria for selection.




                                                                                     46
IMPROVE – Context
Tools used in Improve Phase are:
       Brainstorming

       To Be Process Map

       Solution Evaluation Matrix

       Stakeholders’ Analysis

       Communication Matrix

       Training Schedule



                                       47
IMPROVE – Brainstorming
  Replacing roller after a specified time interval.

  Appointing quality controller to check the overall operating process’s quality

and identify and remove bottlenecks.

  Jobs should not become burdensome for the employees.

  Timely maintenance of machineries.

  Adding quality checks to the JD of the operator.

  Check the volume and mixing of ink before the printing starts to avoid ink

from spreading over the paper

                                                                                   48
IMPROVE – Brainstorming
  A sample print should be done to make sure ink is in the right volume

  A sample print should be done to make sure that picture resolution is

superior

  Check points to review quality on each step/stage

  All machines should be regularly maintained and checked before any job is

to be started

  All employees should be given proper training and incentives to make sure

all human errors are avoided and proper checks are maintained throughout the

process                                                                        49
IMPROVE – Brainstorming
  Control over delivery of specified/desired cards/books to client should be

our ultimate motto as our job is not only to print quality books but also to

deliver to customer :)

  Proper scheduling the tasks assigned to workers to reduce over flow & avoid

heat-up of machines which could also be the cause of text missing or blurred

pictures/text

  Quality Assurance officer & Quality Controller ; Establishment of Quality

Control Dept
                                                                                50
IMPROVE – Selected Solutions

  Appointing quality controller to check the overall operating process’s quality

and identify and remove bottlenecks.(QC to devise proper manuals & SOPS )

  A sample print should be taken to make sure ink is in the right volume and

sample print for the picture resolution also to be taken.

 Regular maintenance of machine and check before any job is to be started.

 Proper scheduling of the tasks to avoid heat-up of machines.

 The paper placement should be checked to make sure that there is no

overlapping of text
                                                                               51
IMPROVE - „To Be‟ Process




                            52
IMPROVE – Solution Evaluation Matrix
                                                                     Estimated                 Estimated
List of Root Cause (s)        List Solutions           % of Effect             Complexity                      Risk Priority Validation ?
                                                                       Cost                      Benefits
                                                                                               This would
                      1. A sample print should
                                                                                               prevent the
                     be done to make sure that
                                                          95%        PKR 350/-       1 hour    time loss in    Low      2        Yes
                          picture resolution is
 Out of registration                                                                          reprinting the
                       superior & text is clear
 printing (Unclear                                                                              whole job
  Text & Picture)         2. Reviewing quality                                                 This would
                         (proper placement of                        PKR 15000                 prevent the
                      paper whilst printing) &            90%         (salary of     2 hour    time loss in    Low      1        Yes
                           ensure machine is                             QC)                  reprinting the
                         performing optimally                                                   whole job
                       1. Proper scheduling of                                                 Crispness in
                      machine to avoid heatup                                      30-45 min images leading
                                                          95%             -                                    High     1        No
 Picture resolution   causing ink to spur over                                      planning to good quality
  issues (Shaded                 paper                                                             print
 Pictures, Pictures 2. Match with dummy and                           PKR 500
                                                                                                  A move
 looks double,etc)    this task should be given                       (cost of
                                                                                                  towards
                        to QC & paper quality             95%          sample       1 hour                     Low      2        Yes
                                                                                                 customer
                     should be checked before                        printing of
                                                                                                satisfaction
                                printing                              pictures)
                                                                                              Cost savings as
 Concreteness of ink 1. Check the volume and
                                                                                              ink would not
     (Density &      mixing of ink before the             85%                       1 hour                    Med       1        Yes
                                                                                              be wasted due
  unnecessary lines)         printing
                                                                                               to negligence
                                                                                                This would
                         1. QC ensures at first that                                            prevent the
  Inadequate Plates      plates are designed as per       90%         PKR 250        1 day      time loss in Low        1        Yes
                                specification.                                                reprinting the
                                                                                                 whole job                             53
IMPROVE – Risk Analysis
                                                                   Score
List the Solution    Failure Mode                                                                       Due
                                      Severity, S Probability, P = S X P
    or Major      (What can go wrong)                                                                   Date
                                      (1-10) 10 is (10 is very (High score      Action Plan      Owner
  Elements of       List each failure                                                                    for
                                         Worst      probable)       need
     solution             mode                                                                         Action
                                                                 attention)
                                                                               CEO will have to
                                                                                train the quality
                                                                              controller with the
Reviewing Quality                                                               knitty gritties of Shaheed
                   If the quality controller
with the help of a                             9       7            63             printing and     ullah 18-Mar
                    himself is ill informed
 quality inspector                                                             regularly monitor Baray
                                                                               his activities and
                                                                              guide him through
                                                                                 the initial days.
                                                                                   Hameed will
                  Negligence on the part
                                                                                   undertake a
                     of the machine
                                                                                proper check of            Before
                        operator,
Proper scheduling                                                                all the machine            and
                   underestimating the
  of machine to                                7       4            28        critical parts prior Hameed after
                    machine capacity,
  avoid heat up                                                                to every printing           every
                   machine break down
                                                                              job and conduct a             job
                  sooner, spare parts not
                                                                              follow up after the
                     easily available
                                                                                  job is printed.

                                                                                                               54
IMPROVE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis
                  Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude,
                            from supportive to opposed.
                                   Neutral
     List of               Moder                                                                 Level of
                  Strongly        (indiffere Strongly Moderately
 Stakeholders by            ately                                          Reason for           Resistance
                  Supporti           nt or Against/ Against/                                                          Actions
dept / Individual          Suppo                                           Resistance          (High, Med,
                     ve           undecide Opposed Opposed
     names                  rtive                                                                 Low)
                                      d)
                                                                                                                The complaints were
                                                                        CEO completely                           internal and are very
                                                                         agrees with the                      critical in nature and this
                                                                        suggestions being                     has lead to the increasing
 Shaheedullah                                                            provided by the                      rejection rate of the job;
Baray (CEO of         x                                               Project Team. As he is      Low          the business was facing
the Company)                                                            the one, who has                      huge overhead costs and
                                                                        identified the key                      facing losses. Hence a
                                                                         problems at the                     detailed Six Sigma Project
                                                                            company                          was implemented upon the
                                                                                                                        company
                                                                                                             After the complete analysis
                                                                                                             of the rejection rate of the
                                                                      He is very supportive                    jobs, Ahsan has got the
                                                                        and helpful as he                     urgent resolution of the
    AHSAN
                                                                      wants the company to                   problem and now this can
  (Production                 x                                                                   Low
                                                                      earn more profits and                     be eliminated by strict
   Manager)
                                                                      provide better quality                      Quality control and
                                                                        to the customers                          Quality Assurance
                                                                                                              activities on each step of
                                                                                                                         printing
                                                                                                                                      55
IMPROVE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis
                  Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude,
                            from supportive to opposed.
                                   Neutral
     List of               Moder                                                                    Level of
                  Strongly        (indiffere Strongly Moderately
 Stakeholders by            ately                                          Reason for              Resistance
                  Supporti           nt or Against/ Against/                                                             Actions
dept / Individual          Suppo                                           Resistance             (High, Med,
                     ve           undecide Opposed Opposed
     names                  rtive                                                                    Low)
                                      d)
                                                                                                                      Since his job is to
                                                                                                                 purchase the raw material
                                                                                                                    such as ink and paper
                                                                                                                from the market, After the
                                                                                                                   implementation of Six
                                                                      He is indifferent and                       Sigma at the Company,
   ASHRAF
                                                                       fears that his work                           Now he will have to
   (Purchase                          x                                                              Med
                                                                      might increase due to                       ensure that the best raw
   Manager)
                                                                               this.                                  materials would be
                                                                                                                     purchased. After the
                                                                                                                  implementation of this,
                                                                                                                the reason of the rejection
                                                                                                                    rate would not be the
                                                                                                                   quality of paper or ink
                                                                                                                     After the successful
                                                                      They are moderately
                                                                                                                   Implementation of Six
                                                                        supportive of the
 HAMEED &                                                                                                         Sigma at the Company,
                                                                      TQM philosophy as
  RIZWAN                                                                                                              both the machine
                              x                                        they feel that their          Med
  (Machine                                                                                                       operators will have to be
                                                                      expertise is doubted.
  Operators)                                                                                                     trained on quality control
                                                                       There are however,
                                                                                                                measures so that the need
                                                                      willing to give it a try.
                                                                                                                 for reprinting is reduced.
                                                                                                                                         56
IMPROVE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis
                  Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude,
                            from supportive to opposed.
                                   Neutral
     List of               Moder                                                                   Level of
                  Strongly        (indiffere Strongly Moderately
 Stakeholders by            ately                                          Reason for             Resistance
                  Supporti           nt or Against/ Against/                                                            Actions
dept / Individual          Suppo                                           Resistance            (High, Med,
                     ve           undecide Opposed Opposed
     names                  rtive                                                                   Low)
                                      d)
                                                                                                                     After Six Sigma
                                                                                                               Implementation, they will
                                                                      They are indifferent as                     ensure that the whole
  WAQAR &
                                                                      they say it is not their                  printing process will run
FAZAL (Assistant
                                       x                              job to control quality.       Med             smoothly and the
   Machine
                                                                       They just do as they                        machines would be
  Operators)
                                                                             are told.                         cleaned after each job and
                                                                                                               no technical cause of print
                                                                                                                     rejection occurs
                                                                                                               Waqar will ensure that the
                                                                       Supportive towards                         plates would be made
WAQAR AHMED                                                            the idea, following                     error free and they will not
                              x                                                                     Low
 (Plate Maker)                                                        proper procedures of                       cause any problems of
                                                                          plate making                         miss or double printing or
                                                                                                                      color spillage




                                                                                                                                        57
IMPROVE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis
                  Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude,
                            from supportive to opposed.
                                   Neutral
     List of               Moder                                                                  Level of
                  Strongly        (indiffere Strongly Moderately
 Stakeholders by            ately                                          Reason for            Resistance
                  Supporti           nt or Against/ Against/                                                           Actions
dept / Individual          Suppo                                           Resistance           (High, Med,
                     ve           undecide Opposed Opposed
     names                  rtive                                                                  Low)
                                      d)
                                                                                                                Ibrahim will ensure the
                                                                                                               whole die cutting process
                                                                      Ibrahim is supportive                   to run smoothly and error
                                                                      towards the idea and                      free. He will make sure
IBRAHIM (Die
                      x                                                follows the standard        Low         that no any rejection rate
   Cutter)
                                                                         practices of die                      occurs due to the cutting.
                                                                             cutting                           He will ensure the quality
                                                                                                                assurance in die cutting
                                                                                                                        process
                                                                                                               Mehfooz will ensure the
                                                                                                              proper binding of the jobs
                                                                       Supportive towards
                                                                                                              and will be involved in the
                                                                        the idea, so as to
  MEHFOOZ             x                                                                                       Quality control process. If
                                                                      maintain a better level      Low
   (Binder)                                                                                                      he will find any miss
                                                                        of service in the
                                                                                                               printings during binding
                                                                        printing industry
                                                                                                              he will report to the higher
                                                                                                                      management


                                                                                                                                       58
IMPROVE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis
                  Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude,
                            from supportive to opposed.
                                   Neutral
     List of               Moder                                                                 Level of
                  Strongly        (indiffere Strongly Moderately
 Stakeholders by            ately                                          Reason for           Resistance
                  Supporti           nt or Against/ Against/                                                         Actions
dept / Individual          Suppo                                           Resistance          (High, Med,
                     ve           undecide Opposed Opposed
     names                  rtive                                                                 Low)
                                      d)

                                                                                                              The Quality inspectors
                                                                      Strongly supportive as
    Quality                                                                                                  employed at various levels
                      x                                               they are employed for         -
  Inspector(s)                                                                                                 will ensure that all the
                                                                         ensuring quality
                                                                                                              processes are followed




                                                                                                                                     59
IMPROVE – Communication Matrix
              Audience                Method               Frequency                Owner
  Sponsor – Mr. Shaheedullah Baray,              Daily as required or 2-3 times a   Project
                                    Face to Face
        CEO, Rosette Printers                                 week                  Manager
  Stakeholder - AHSAN (Production                 Daily as required, At times       Project
                                    Face to Face
              Manager)                                       Weekly                 Manager
   Stakeholder- ASHRAF (Purchase                  Daily as required, At times       Project
                                    Face to Face
              Manager)                                       Weekly                 Manager
Stakeholder - HAMEED & RIZWAN                     Daily as required, At times       Project
                                    Face to Face
         (Machine Operators)                                 Weekly                 Manager
Stakeholder - WAQAR AHMED (Plate                                                    Project
                                    Face to Face             Weekly
                Maker)                                                              Manager
                                                                                    Project
Stakeholder - IBRAHIM (Die Cutter) Face to Face                Weekly
                                                                                    Manager
                                                                                    Project
 Stakeholder - MEHFOOZ (Binder) Face to Face                   Weekly
                                                                                    Manager



                                                                                              60
IMPROVE – Training Schedule
                      Training Schedule - Pre Live Training
                                             Training Schedule
Sr. No   Pre - Live Training Program                             Responsibility
                                                    Date
   1     Orientation of the new process            17-Mar        Project Manager
   2    Detail description of procedures           17-Mar        Project Manager
   3   Departments role and responsibilities       18-Mar        Project Manager
   4        Process Monitoring tools               19-Mar        Project Manager
   5            Mini case studies                  20-Mar        Project Manager
   6                Role Play                      21-Mar        Project Manager
   7       Quiz on New process flow                21-Mar        Project Manager


                      Training Schedule - Post Live Training
                                             Training Schedule
Sr. No    Post - Live Training Program                           Responsibility
                                                    Date
  1             Discussion Sessions                22-Mar        Process Owner
  2              Review of Process                 23-Mar        Process Owner
  3      Refresher Training on the Process         24-Mar        Process Owner

                                                                                   61
Key Findings – Lessons Learned
Implementation of the solution was an interesting task since we had placed

checks at every level.

The CEO’s guidance and support in mapping and implementing the process

was an add on.

Objective measurement of the results was needed.




                                                                         62
CONTROL PHASE




                63
CONTROL – Context
  The main objective of this area is to ensure that the entire process has close

controls and is being monitored.

  Control is required at all levels of the new process.

  Number of Graphs were used to measure the effectiveness of the process.

  The control phase helped us to fix the process and shows the level of

commitment and seriousness required at the different stages of the process

  Tools used in Control Phase are:

          Control Chart
          Control Plan
                                                                                   64
CONTROL – Charts
                                    Books                Calendars               Cards              Others            Total
    September                            12                   0                       3                  0               15
    October                              13                   0                       0                  5               18
    November                             13                   0                       5                  3               21
    December                             16                   7                       1                  2               26
    January                              15                   1                       3                  1               20
    February                             14                   1                       1                  4               20
    March                                13                   0                       5                  0               18
    April                                17                   0                       0                  3               20
    May                                  15                   0                       2                  2               19
    Total                            128                      9                       20                 20              177
Histogram 1: Types of jobs printed by the company per month
    30                                                   26
    25                                        21                       20         20                           20          19
    20                         18                                                                   18   17
                     15                            16         15            14                                      15
    15      12            13        13                                                     13

    10                                              7
                               5         5                                        4             5
     5           3                           3                     3                                           3
                                                        12     1 1           11
                                                                                                                          22
     0
            September October November December               January       February        March         April          May

                     Books               Calenders                 Cards              Others                  Total             65
CONTROL – Charts
                                                    Total Jobs of Books
           September                                         12
           October                                           13
           November                                          13
           December                                          16
           January                                           15
           February                                          14
           March                                             13
           April                                             17
           May                                               15
           Total                                            128
Histogram 2: Total number of jobs of Books in 9 months
150                                                                                  128

100

 50
        12       13       13       16       15        14        13     17      15
 0
      September October November December January   February   March   April   May   Total


                                   Total Jobs of Books
                                                                                             66
CONTROL – Charts
                                          Rejected Jobs of Books
                       September                     5
                       October                       4
                       November                      2
                       December                      3
                       January                       4
                       February                      5
                       March                         1
                       April                         2
                       May                           1
                       Total                        27
Histogram 3: Total number of jobs of Books rejected in 9 months
      30                                                                                  27
      25
      20
      15
      10
              5        4                          4         5
       5                        2        3                                   2
                                                                     1              1
       0
           September October November December January   February   March   April   May   Total


                                      Rejected Jobs of Books                                      67
CONTROL – Charts
                                      Total Jobs of Books                Rejected Jobs of Books
        September                                12                                    5
        October                                  13                                    4
        November                                 13                                    2
        December                                 16                                    3
        January                                  15                                    4
        February                                 14                                    5
        March                                    13                                    1
        April                                    17                                    2
        May                                      15                                    1
        Total                                   128                                   27
Histogram 4: Total number of jobs of Books and their rejection per month
          180
          160
          140                                                                                    27
          120
          100
           80
           60                                                                                    128
           40
                   5        4        2        3        4         5         1      2         1
           20
            0     12       13       13       16       15        14        13     17        15
                September October November December January   February   March   April     May   Total


                         Total Jobs of Books                  Rejected Jobs of Books
                                                                                                         68
CONTROL – Charts
            Out of registration printing   Ink related issues Plate related issues Picture resolution issues   Total
September                2                          2                        0                    1              5
October                  2                          1                        0                    1              4
November                 1                          0                        0                    1              2
December                 2                          0                        1                    0              3
January                  2                          1                        1                    0              4
February                 3                          2                        0                    0              5
March                    0                          1                        0                    0              1
April                    1                          0                        0                    1              2
May                      0                          0                        1                    0              1
Total                   13                          7                        3                    4             27
                         Histogram 5: Type of defects per month
               12
               10
                8       5                                                5
                6                 4                           4
                4                                   3
                                           2                                              2
                2                                                                 1                   1
                0
                     September October November December    January   February   March   April    May

                             Out of registration printing             Ink related issues
                             Plate related issues                     Picture resolution issues
                             Total                                                                                     69
CONTROL – Plan („To Be‟ Process)




                                   70
CONTROL – Plan
                      Control                                Checking
    Indicators                      Checking Item                              Responsibility
                       Limit                                 Frequency
T1: Delivery of the                                        Every time a      Quality control staff,
                                Paper sets returned to
specified paper for   1 Day                                new job is        Admin, purchase
                                the supplier
printing                                                   ordered           manager
                                Inaccurate plates         Every time a
                                                                             Quality control staff,
T2: Plate making      1 Day     returned to the pre press new job is
                                                                             plate maker
                                department for remaking printed
                                Inaccuracy in ink          Every time a      Quality control staff,
T3: Preparation of
                      1 Hour    preparation and returned   new job is        machine operator,
ink
                                for re preparation         printed           production manager
                                                                             Quality control staff,
                                                           After every job
T4: Printing of                 Books being reprinted                        production manager,
                      2 Days                               of books are
books                           due to inaccuracy                            machine operator,
                                                           printed
                                                                             CEO
T5, T6, T7:                     Inaccuracy in cutting,
                                                           For every job     Quality control staff,
Cutting, Creasing               creasing or binding and
                      1 Day                                of books          Cutter, Binder,
& Binding of                    returned to the post
                                                           printed           Assistant Binder
books                           press department
                                                                                                      71
Key Findings – Lessons Learned
  Strict monitoring of all activities and procedures is compulsory

  Regular updates with machine operators, plate makers and Process House is

needed to ensure that problems are identified and resolved in due time.

  Accurate registration of complaints

  Quality inspectors will have complete responsibility to ensure that the

processes are followed but the employees will also have to take responsibility

  Training of operation staff is mandatory


                                                                                 72
Key Findings – Team Lessons Learned

  A prerequisite for implementing Six Sigma effectively is team work

  All team members had to give in their time and effort to understand the

entire printing process prior to starting work on Six Sigma implementation

  Since the CEO was our group member’s father, the data collection process

was convenient

  Six Sigma helped in the identification of the loopholes in the process and

provided a solution to reduce the errors
                                                                               73
APPENDIX
Tools used in the project were:
        Project Plan
        Project Charter
        Process Mapping
        VOC to CTQ
        Stakeholders’ Analysis in Define Phase
        Data Collection Plan
        Measure – Various Histograms
        Detailed ‘As is’ Process Map
        Pareto Chart
        Fishbone Structure (Cause And Effect)
        ‘To be’ Process Map
        Solution Evaluation Matrix
        Stakeholders’ Analysis in Improve Phase
        Communication Matrix
        Training Schedule
        Control – Various Histograms
        Control Plan                              74
THANK YOU!




             75

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Six Sigma for Rosette Printers

DFMPro Brochure
DFMPro BrochureDFMPro Brochure
DFMPro BrochureDFMPro
 
Consequences of a Failed ECM Implementation
Consequences of a Failed ECM ImplementationConsequences of a Failed ECM Implementation
Consequences of a Failed ECM ImplementationiDatix
 
Organize and Justify Your EMI Initiative
Organize and Justify Your EMI InitiativeOrganize and Justify Your EMI Initiative
Organize and Justify Your EMI InitiativeNorthwest Analytics
 
Pitch3dmatters
Pitch3dmattersPitch3dmatters
Pitch3dmattersmarklim86
 
Cement plant catalog for operational excellence
Cement plant catalog for operational excellenceCement plant catalog for operational excellence
Cement plant catalog for operational excellenceMattcons
 
Project management - Basics for all
Project management - Basics for allProject management - Basics for all
Project management - Basics for allSurgyy Design
 
[Webinar Slides] Put an End to Manual Data Processing
[Webinar Slides] Put an End to Manual Data Processing [Webinar Slides] Put an End to Manual Data Processing
[Webinar Slides] Put an End to Manual Data Processing AIIM International
 
That's not what I wanted, An Acando master class in business analysis.
That's not what I wanted, An Acando master class in business analysis.That's not what I wanted, An Acando master class in business analysis.
That's not what I wanted, An Acando master class in business analysis.Edward Gould
 
Application Development Outsourcing
Application Development OutsourcingApplication Development Outsourcing
Application Development Outsourcinghmclake
 
Project Governance and Failure
Project Governance and FailureProject Governance and Failure
Project Governance and FailureMichael Krigsman
 
How Well Does ERP Facilitate Project Based Business Models?
How Well Does ERP Facilitate Project Based Business Models?How Well Does ERP Facilitate Project Based Business Models?
How Well Does ERP Facilitate Project Based Business Models?Charles Rathmann
 
Six Sigma- Define & Measure_Sudhanshu.pdf
Six Sigma- Define & Measure_Sudhanshu.pdfSix Sigma- Define & Measure_Sudhanshu.pdf
Six Sigma- Define & Measure_Sudhanshu.pdfSudhanshuMittal20
 
CFITS Disaster Recovery 2009
CFITS Disaster Recovery 2009CFITS Disaster Recovery 2009
CFITS Disaster Recovery 2009cfits
 
Tba Honky Tonk
Tba Honky TonkTba Honky Tonk
Tba Honky TonkBlock One
 

Ähnlich wie Six Sigma for Rosette Printers (20)

DFMPro Brochure
DFMPro BrochureDFMPro Brochure
DFMPro Brochure
 
Consequences of a Failed ECM Implementation
Consequences of a Failed ECM ImplementationConsequences of a Failed ECM Implementation
Consequences of a Failed ECM Implementation
 
Organize and Justify Your EMI Initiative
Organize and Justify Your EMI InitiativeOrganize and Justify Your EMI Initiative
Organize and Justify Your EMI Initiative
 
3D Matters1
3D Matters13D Matters1
3D Matters1
 
Pitch3dmatters
Pitch3dmattersPitch3dmatters
Pitch3dmatters
 
Cement plant catalog for operational excellence
Cement plant catalog for operational excellenceCement plant catalog for operational excellence
Cement plant catalog for operational excellence
 
Project management - Basics for all
Project management - Basics for allProject management - Basics for all
Project management - Basics for all
 
[Webinar Slides] Put an End to Manual Data Processing
[Webinar Slides] Put an End to Manual Data Processing [Webinar Slides] Put an End to Manual Data Processing
[Webinar Slides] Put an End to Manual Data Processing
 
BPM in Telecoms
BPM in TelecomsBPM in Telecoms
BPM in Telecoms
 
3D Matters
3D Matters3D Matters
3D Matters
 
Does the project manager stand a chance?
Does the project manager stand a chance?Does the project manager stand a chance?
Does the project manager stand a chance?
 
That's not what I wanted, An Acando master class in business analysis.
That's not what I wanted, An Acando master class in business analysis.That's not what I wanted, An Acando master class in business analysis.
That's not what I wanted, An Acando master class in business analysis.
 
Application Development Outsourcing
Application Development OutsourcingApplication Development Outsourcing
Application Development Outsourcing
 
Project Governance and Failure
Project Governance and FailureProject Governance and Failure
Project Governance and Failure
 
Printers don't print, people do
Printers don't print, people doPrinters don't print, people do
Printers don't print, people do
 
Six Sigma
Six SigmaSix Sigma
Six Sigma
 
How Well Does ERP Facilitate Project Based Business Models?
How Well Does ERP Facilitate Project Based Business Models?How Well Does ERP Facilitate Project Based Business Models?
How Well Does ERP Facilitate Project Based Business Models?
 
Six Sigma- Define & Measure_Sudhanshu.pdf
Six Sigma- Define & Measure_Sudhanshu.pdfSix Sigma- Define & Measure_Sudhanshu.pdf
Six Sigma- Define & Measure_Sudhanshu.pdf
 
CFITS Disaster Recovery 2009
CFITS Disaster Recovery 2009CFITS Disaster Recovery 2009
CFITS Disaster Recovery 2009
 
Tba Honky Tonk
Tba Honky TonkTba Honky Tonk
Tba Honky Tonk
 

Mehr von Mitsui & Co., Ltd.

Internal cashflow and investment decisions: Case of Pakistani sugar sector.
Internal cashflow and investment decisions: Case of Pakistani sugar sector.Internal cashflow and investment decisions: Case of Pakistani sugar sector.
Internal cashflow and investment decisions: Case of Pakistani sugar sector.Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
 
Analysis of Financial Statements (Lucky Cement Limited)
Analysis of Financial Statements (Lucky Cement Limited)Analysis of Financial Statements (Lucky Cement Limited)
Analysis of Financial Statements (Lucky Cement Limited)Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
 
State Bank of Pakistan (Forex, Securities & Investment Division)
State Bank of Pakistan (Forex, Securities & Investment Division)State Bank of Pakistan (Forex, Securities & Investment Division)
State Bank of Pakistan (Forex, Securities & Investment Division)Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
 
Bank's Liabilities (Comparison of UBL, HBL, Standard Chartered Bank and Citib...
Bank's Liabilities (Comparison of UBL, HBL, Standard Chartered Bank and Citib...Bank's Liabilities (Comparison of UBL, HBL, Standard Chartered Bank and Citib...
Bank's Liabilities (Comparison of UBL, HBL, Standard Chartered Bank and Citib...Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
 
Global Depositary Receipt (GDR)
Global Depositary Receipt (GDR)Global Depositary Receipt (GDR)
Global Depositary Receipt (GDR)Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
 
Privatization of SOEs in Pakistan
Privatization of SOEs in PakistanPrivatization of SOEs in Pakistan
Privatization of SOEs in PakistanMitsui & Co., Ltd.
 
Mc Donalds Pakistan (Presence & Competition)
Mc Donalds Pakistan (Presence & Competition)Mc Donalds Pakistan (Presence & Competition)
Mc Donalds Pakistan (Presence & Competition)Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
 

Mehr von Mitsui & Co., Ltd. (7)

Internal cashflow and investment decisions: Case of Pakistani sugar sector.
Internal cashflow and investment decisions: Case of Pakistani sugar sector.Internal cashflow and investment decisions: Case of Pakistani sugar sector.
Internal cashflow and investment decisions: Case of Pakistani sugar sector.
 
Analysis of Financial Statements (Lucky Cement Limited)
Analysis of Financial Statements (Lucky Cement Limited)Analysis of Financial Statements (Lucky Cement Limited)
Analysis of Financial Statements (Lucky Cement Limited)
 
State Bank of Pakistan (Forex, Securities & Investment Division)
State Bank of Pakistan (Forex, Securities & Investment Division)State Bank of Pakistan (Forex, Securities & Investment Division)
State Bank of Pakistan (Forex, Securities & Investment Division)
 
Bank's Liabilities (Comparison of UBL, HBL, Standard Chartered Bank and Citib...
Bank's Liabilities (Comparison of UBL, HBL, Standard Chartered Bank and Citib...Bank's Liabilities (Comparison of UBL, HBL, Standard Chartered Bank and Citib...
Bank's Liabilities (Comparison of UBL, HBL, Standard Chartered Bank and Citib...
 
Global Depositary Receipt (GDR)
Global Depositary Receipt (GDR)Global Depositary Receipt (GDR)
Global Depositary Receipt (GDR)
 
Privatization of SOEs in Pakistan
Privatization of SOEs in PakistanPrivatization of SOEs in Pakistan
Privatization of SOEs in Pakistan
 
Mc Donalds Pakistan (Presence & Competition)
Mc Donalds Pakistan (Presence & Competition)Mc Donalds Pakistan (Presence & Competition)
Mc Donalds Pakistan (Presence & Competition)
 

Six Sigma for Rosette Printers

  • 1. Total Quality Management Six Sigma for Rosette Printers 1
  • 2. 2
  • 3. PROJECT TITLE Unacceptable job rejection rate for books SUBMITTED BY Zahra Baray (0935220) Shaikh Faizan Ahmed (0935117) Hira Hayat (0935190) Syed Anser Ahmed (0935121) Awais Ahmed Memon (0935103) Syed Muhammad Imran (0935122) Raza Soomro (0935127) Sohail Akhter (0935226) SUBMITTED TO Ma‟am Memoona Masood 3
  • 4. “Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives. ” -William A. Foster 4
  • 6. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – Rosette Printers Rosette Printers, established in 1980, is a printing set up in Karachi catering to a wide customer base including corporates. Their clientele include One Potato Two Potato, OUP, Mohatta Palace, IUCN, GunSmoke etc Rosette Printers has been having some operational problems related to quality issues which are significantly impacting the bottom line. 6
  • 7. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - Introduction Printing is a very detail-oriented, demanding process and quality printing is only possible if the entire process is fool proof. In case of non compliance of quality checks at the correct stages and due to negligence by the employees, the job is spoilt and the company needs to make a run for re-printing that adds to costs, efforts and difficulty in meeting deadlines. On the other hand, these defects lead to reprinting of the entire job that burdens the financials of the company. 7
  • 8. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – Six Sigma The CEO of Rosette Printers wanted help regarding the clear identification of these problems and the resolution steps in order to arrest the runaway costs associated with these operational issues. The entire project has been diagnosed using Six Sigma concepts. Preliminary information based on data confirms that approximately 30% of the books are being rejected due to quality issues. 8
  • 9. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – Key Issues The key problem areas were identified as; Out of registration printing Ink related issues Picture resolution issues Human errors Unnecessary increase in overall costs and wastage Plate making issues 9
  • 10. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – Expected Results The solutions proposed would improve the overall business process (especially printing) Reduce cost incurrence Increase the overall efficiency of the entire printing process 10
  • 11. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – Expected Benefits Greater operational excellence Customer satisfaction Quality what it should be 11
  • 13. DEFINE – Context Defects leading to reprinting - Current issues: Quality printing is essential for the success of any printed material and this could only be done if the entire process is fool proof. These defects lead to reprinting of the entire job that burdens the financials of the company. In resolution to the above stated conditions we aim to use DMAIC to improve the overall printing process to gain customer satisfaction and confidence in our procedures, making quality what it should be. 13
  • 14. DEFINE – Context Tools used in Define Phase are:  CTQ Specifications  Project Charter  Process Map  Stakeholder Analysis 14
  • 15. DEFINE – Project Charter Project Title: Unacceptable job rejection rate for books Business: Printing Industry Business Case Problem Statement 30%*of the books are rejected due to quality issues The key problems faced are: ·Significant impact on the financials of the business. · Out of registration printing ·Significant wastage of resources and unnecessary · Ink related issues cost incurrence. · Picture resolution issues ·In order for optimum business performance the · Human errors rejection rate needs to come down to zero. This would result in reduced wastage, on time delivery · Increase in overall costs and wastage and repeat orders. · Plate making issues Project Scope Goal Statement (Measurable) In scope Out of Scope Internal Customer (CEO): Book printing Printing of Cards, · CTQ: Reduce the 30% rejection rate to 1% of the Calendars, Magazines, books printed Envelopes Business: · Eliminate human error by 100% · To avoid costs and effort due to double printing by streamlining the printing process *The actual rejection rate for books was 28% but we have kept it 30%. 15
  • 16. DEFINE – Project Charter Project Title: Unacceptable job rejection rate for books Business: Printing Industry Project Plan/ Milestones / Deliverables Roles of Team Members Name Role % of time spent Memoona Masood Project Coordinator Define 2nd Mar – 7th Mar 2010 Zahra Baray Project Manager 50% Measure 9th Mar – 12th Mar 2010 Shaikh Faizan Ahmed Team Member 30% Hira Hayat Team Member 30% Analyze 13th Mar – 14th Mar 2010 Syed Anser Ahmed Team Member 30% Improve 16th Mar – 21st Mar 2010 Awais Ahmed Memon Team Member 30% Control 22nd Mar – 25th Mar 2010 Syed Imran Team Member 30% Raza Soomro Team Member 30% Sohail Akhter Team Member 30% Projected Benefits Barriers/ Support required Internal Customer (CEO): Reduction of cost Barriers: incurrence · Process House Business: Increase efficiency of the printing process · Production Manager so that defects are reduced to 1% · Purchase Manager · Assistant to Machine Operators · Machine Operators · Plate Maker Support: · Support needed through buy in from everyone. 16
  • 17. DEFINE – VOC to CTQ CTQ (specific Voice of the Customer requirements) CTQ Measure/Metric (VOC) Translating VOC # How are you measuring Current State Target What is the customer into specific your CTQ identified telling us? requirements that we can work with CEO measures the Complains regarding out of Out of registration printing authentication of the final 98% Authentic Accurate printing on registration are approximately 50% 1 (Unclear Text & Picture) print by comparing it with Print Job every book. of all rejected books. dummy print (approved by client at first hand) CEO measures the quality Picture resolution issues Blurred pictures are reported of the Printed pictures 100% Clear (Shaded Pictures, Pictures Proper & clear picture causing huge set back to quality of 2 comparing it with dummy Pictures looks double,etc) resolution job accounting approximately 15% print that was approved by of complains client. Production manager sets the Approximately 25% of complains Concreteness of ink Proper volume of ink specification of ink to be reported are due to improper use 99% Consistent 3 (Density & unnecessary and same quality of used for specific job keeping of ink & lack of consistent quality quality of print lines) print for entire job in view the dummy print. of print Ensure that Plates use Purchase manager ensures Approximately 10% of complains 100% Quality Plate for Printing are as per the quality Plate has been 4 Inadequate Plates results due to use of inadequate usage the required quality. used with join collaboration plates with CEO. 17
  • 18. DEFINE – Process Mapping 18
  • 19. DEFINE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude, from supportive to opposed. Neutral List of Moder Level of Strongly (indiffere Strongly Moderately Stakeholders by ately Reason for Resistance Supporti nt or Against/ Against/ Actions dept / Individual Suppo Resistance (High, Med, ve undecide Opposed Opposed names rtive Low) d) The complaints are CEO completely internal and are very agrees with the critical in nature and this suggestions being has lead to the increasing Shaheedullah provided by the rejection rate of the job; Baray (CEO of x Project Team. As he is Low the business is facing huge the Company) the one, who has overhead costs and facing identified the key losses. Hence a detailed problems at the Six Sigma Project is being company implemented upon the company After the complete analysis of the rejection He is very supportive rate of the jobs, Ahsan and helpful as he wants the urgent AHSAN wants the company to resolution of the problem (Production x Med earn more profits and and this can be eliminated Manager) provide better quality by strict Quality control to the customers and Quality Assurance activities on each step of printing 19
  • 20. DEFINE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude, from supportive to opposed. Neutral List of Moder Level of Strongly (indiffere Strongly Moderately Stakeholders by ately Reason for Resistance Supporti nt or Against/ Against/ Actions dept / Individual Suppo Resistance (High, Med, ve undecide Opposed Opposed names rtive Low) d) Since his job is to purchase the raw material such as ink and paper He is indifferent and from the market, he will ASHRAF fears that his work have to ensure that the (Purchase x Med might increase due to best raw materials would Manager) this. be purchases. So the reason of the rejection rate would not be the quality of paper or ink They are not supportive of the Both the machine HAMEED & TQM philosophy as operators will have to be RIZWAN they feel that their x High trained on quality control (Machine expertise is doubted. measures so that the need Operators) There will be all for reprinting is reduced. checks on them and they feel intimidated. 20
  • 21. DEFINE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude, from supportive to opposed. Neutral List of Moder Level of Strongly (indiffere Strongly Moderately Stakeholders by ately Reason for Resistance Supporti nt or Against/ Against/ Actions dept / Individual Suppo Resistance (High, Med, ve undecide Opposed Opposed names rtive Low) d) They will ensure that the They are indifferent as whole printing process will WAQAR & they say it is not their run smoothly and the FAZAL (Assistant x job to control quality. Med machines would be Machine They just do as they cleaned after each job and Operators) are told. no any technical cause of print rejection occurs Waqar will ensure that the Supportive towards plates would be made WAQAR AHMED the idea, following error free and they will not x Low (Plate Maker) proper procedures of cause any problems of plate making double printing or color spillage 21
  • 22. DEFINE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude, from supportive to opposed. Neutral List of Moder Level of Strongly (indiffere Strongly Moderately Stakeholders by ately Reason for Resistance Supporti nt or Against/ Against/ Actions dept / Individual Suppo Resistance (High, Med, ve undecide Opposed Opposed names rtive Low) d) Ibrahim will ensure the whole die cutting process Ibrahim is supportive to run smoothly and error towards the idea and free. He will make sure IBRAHIM (Die x follows the standard Low that no any rejection rate Cutter) practices of die occurs due to the cutting. cutting He will ensure the quality assurance in die cutting process Mehfooz will ensure the proper binding of the jobs Supportive towards and will be involved in the the idea, so as to MEHFOOZ Quality control process. If x maintain a better level Low (Binder) he will find any miss of service in the printings during binding printing industry he will report to the higher management 22
  • 23. DEFINE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude, from supportive to opposed. Neutral List of Moder Level of Strongly (indiffere Strongly Moderately Stakeholders by ately Reason for Resistance Supporti nt or Against/ Against/ Actions dept / Individual Suppo Resistance (High, Med, ve undecide Opposed Opposed names rtive Low) d) Supportive towards These persons will assist OMAIR, LIAQAT the idea, as their tasks Mehfooz to ensure error & FAIZY x are not the main ones Low free binding of the jobs (Assistant that would hinder and to perform Quality Binders) quality control activities 23
  • 25. MEASURE - Context Tools used in Measure Phase are:  Data Collection Plan  Histograms  As-Is Process 25
  • 26. MEASURE – Data Collection Plan Data Source and Performance Measure Operational Definition Sample Size Location The book printing process • CEO from the time the client Unacceptable job • Production Manager gives the job till the time the Last 6 months rejection rate for books • Paper Suppliers job is printed should be • Process House defect free Other Data that When will data be How will data be Who will collect the data should be collected collected collected Rejection from various types of After completion of every CEO Manually defects, total jobs job and at month end of books each month 26
  • 27. MEASURE – Histograms Books Calendars Cards Others Total September 12 0 3 0 15 October 13 0 0 5 18 November 13 0 5 3 21 December 16 7 1 2 26 January 15 1 3 1 20 February 14 1 1 4 20 Total 83 9 13 15 120 Histogram 1: Types of jobs printed by the company per month 30 26 25 21 20 20 20 18 15 16 15 14 15 12 13 13 10 7 5 5 4 5 3 3 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 September October November December January February Books Calenders Cards Others Total 27
  • 28. MEASURE – Histograms Total Jobs of Books September 12 October 13 November 13 December 16 January 15 February 14 Total 83 Histogram 2: Total number of jobs of Books in 6 months 100 83 80 60 40 20 12 13 13 16 15 14 0 September October November December January February Total Total Jobs of Books 28
  • 29. WORKING  Total jobs = 120  Total rejection= 40% of 120 = 48 rejected jobs  Total books rejected out of the rejected jobs = 48 * 48% = 23* *(48% that we have taken as rounded off to 50%)  Total books = 83  Total rejection of books = 28%*  Total books rejected= 83 * 28% = 23 *(28% that we have taken as rounded off to 30%)
  • 30. MEASURE – Pie Chart for Rejection Total Jobs - 120 15 13 Total Jobs Books Total Jobs Calenders Total Jobs Cards 9 Total Jobs Others 83 Total Rejection: 40% of 120 jobs = 48 Books Books, 23 Others Others, 25 *48% of total jobs rejected accrues to books 30
  • 31. MEASURE – Histograms Rejected Jobs of Books September 5 October 4 November 2 December 3 January 4 February 5 Total 23 Histogram 3: Total number of jobs of Books rejected in 6 months 25 23 20 15 10 5 4 4 5 5 2 3 0 September October November December January February Total Rejected Jobs of Books 31
  • 32. MEASURE – Histograms Total Jobs of Books Rejected Jobs of Books September 12 5 October 13 4 November 13 2 December 16 3 January 15 4 February 14 5 Total 83 23 Histogram 4: Total number of jobs of Books and their rejection per month 120 23 100 80 60 40 83 20 5 4 2 3 4 5 12 13 13 16 15 14 0 September October November December January February Total Total Jobs of Books Rejected Jobs of Books 32
  • 33. MEASURE – Histograms Out of registration printing Ink related issues Plate related issues Picture resolution issues Total September 2 2 0 1 5 October 2 1 0 1 4 November 1 0 0 1 2 December 2 0 1 0 3 January 2 1 1 0 4 February 3 2 0 0 5 Total 12 6 2 3 23 Histogram 5: Type of defects per month 12 10 8 5 5 6 4 4 4 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 0 September October November December January February Out of registration printing Ink related issues Plate related issues Picture resolution issues Total 33
  • 34. MEASURE - „As Is‟ Process Yes 34
  • 35. Key Findings – Lessons Learned The books printed by Rosette Printers are mostly rejected by their CEO due to quality issues like out of registration printing, ink related issues, plate making issues and picture resolution issues The errors were caused by negligence and lack of skills of the staff. Errors are identified once the book is printed and there is a need for back working the process to find the source There is no proper procedure followed to keep a check and balance on the books printed that leads to blame game played by the staff. 35
  • 36. Key Challenges There is no proper database maintained of the number of jobs rejected and the reason for their rejection. Data has been estimated with the help of VOC. No proper acceptance of the errors made by the respective personnel. Proper monitoring and quality check will be needed at each stage. 36
  • 38. ANALYZE - Context Tools used in Analyze Phase are:  Pareto Chart  Fishbone Diagram 38
  • 39. ANALYZE – Pareto Chart Problem Type Out of registration printing Ink related issues Picture resolution issues Plate related issues Count 12 6 3 2 % 52% 26% 13% 9% Cumulative % 52% 78% 91% 100% 14 120% 12 100% 12 91% 100% 10 78% 80% 8 52% 6 60% 6 40% 4 3 2 2 20% 0 0% Out of registration Ink related issues Picture resolution Plate related issues printing issues Count Cumulative % 39
  • 40. ANALYZE – Fishbone Diagram 40
  • 41. Data Analysis & Summary Based on the Histogram, Fishbone Diagram and Brainstorming sessions, we have ascertained that the root causes of the problems are :  Lack of proper procedures and checks  No proper training institute exists for the printing technicians so they fail to differentiate quality errors  Since the machines are second hand, they tend to break down and their parts aren’t readily available  Paper delivery can sometimes be the cause of printing defects as the paper is normally ordered on phone and not checked 41
  • 42. Plan for Improvement Create a plan for improvement: Generating creative solutions ideas Analyzing the solution options and selecting the best alternative (s) Developing implementation plan Learning from the pilot test and implementing the solutions full-scale 42
  • 43. Proposal for Better Resolution of the Issue In order to resolve the errors in the book printing process, we have decided to appoint 2 quality inspectors. Their job description will include:  Ensure that the paper specifications match with the paper delivered.  Check for errors in film making by the Process House  Ensure that the plates are not over/under exposed and are intact 43
  • 44. Proposal for Better Resolution of the Issue  Make sure that the machine operators maintain the machine, clean it after every job, check the roller and keep a close eye for out of registration printing errors.  Check the concreteness of ink prior to the entire printing of books with regular testing. 44
  • 46. IMPROVE – Context In order to improve the overall performance and resolve the issue at all levels it is important to evaluate the different alternatives or options that spring from brainstorming. It is also essential to understand how these alternatives would help meet the set target along with specifying the criteria for selection. 46
  • 47. IMPROVE – Context Tools used in Improve Phase are:  Brainstorming  To Be Process Map  Solution Evaluation Matrix  Stakeholders’ Analysis  Communication Matrix  Training Schedule 47
  • 48. IMPROVE – Brainstorming Replacing roller after a specified time interval. Appointing quality controller to check the overall operating process’s quality and identify and remove bottlenecks. Jobs should not become burdensome for the employees. Timely maintenance of machineries. Adding quality checks to the JD of the operator. Check the volume and mixing of ink before the printing starts to avoid ink from spreading over the paper 48
  • 49. IMPROVE – Brainstorming A sample print should be done to make sure ink is in the right volume A sample print should be done to make sure that picture resolution is superior Check points to review quality on each step/stage All machines should be regularly maintained and checked before any job is to be started All employees should be given proper training and incentives to make sure all human errors are avoided and proper checks are maintained throughout the process 49
  • 50. IMPROVE – Brainstorming Control over delivery of specified/desired cards/books to client should be our ultimate motto as our job is not only to print quality books but also to deliver to customer :) Proper scheduling the tasks assigned to workers to reduce over flow & avoid heat-up of machines which could also be the cause of text missing or blurred pictures/text Quality Assurance officer & Quality Controller ; Establishment of Quality Control Dept 50
  • 51. IMPROVE – Selected Solutions Appointing quality controller to check the overall operating process’s quality and identify and remove bottlenecks.(QC to devise proper manuals & SOPS ) A sample print should be taken to make sure ink is in the right volume and sample print for the picture resolution also to be taken. Regular maintenance of machine and check before any job is to be started. Proper scheduling of the tasks to avoid heat-up of machines. The paper placement should be checked to make sure that there is no overlapping of text 51
  • 52. IMPROVE - „To Be‟ Process 52
  • 53. IMPROVE – Solution Evaluation Matrix Estimated Estimated List of Root Cause (s) List Solutions % of Effect Complexity Risk Priority Validation ? Cost Benefits This would 1. A sample print should prevent the be done to make sure that 95% PKR 350/- 1 hour time loss in Low 2 Yes picture resolution is Out of registration reprinting the superior & text is clear printing (Unclear whole job Text & Picture) 2. Reviewing quality This would (proper placement of PKR 15000 prevent the paper whilst printing) & 90% (salary of 2 hour time loss in Low 1 Yes ensure machine is QC) reprinting the performing optimally whole job 1. Proper scheduling of Crispness in machine to avoid heatup 30-45 min images leading 95% - High 1 No Picture resolution causing ink to spur over planning to good quality issues (Shaded paper print Pictures, Pictures 2. Match with dummy and PKR 500 A move looks double,etc) this task should be given (cost of towards to QC & paper quality 95% sample 1 hour Low 2 Yes customer should be checked before printing of satisfaction printing pictures) Cost savings as Concreteness of ink 1. Check the volume and ink would not (Density & mixing of ink before the 85% 1 hour Med 1 Yes be wasted due unnecessary lines) printing to negligence This would 1. QC ensures at first that prevent the Inadequate Plates plates are designed as per 90% PKR 250 1 day time loss in Low 1 Yes specification. reprinting the whole job 53
  • 54. IMPROVE – Risk Analysis Score List the Solution Failure Mode Due Severity, S Probability, P = S X P or Major (What can go wrong) Date (1-10) 10 is (10 is very (High score Action Plan Owner Elements of List each failure for Worst probable) need solution mode Action attention) CEO will have to train the quality controller with the Reviewing Quality knitty gritties of Shaheed If the quality controller with the help of a 9 7 63 printing and ullah 18-Mar himself is ill informed quality inspector regularly monitor Baray his activities and guide him through the initial days. Hameed will Negligence on the part undertake a of the machine proper check of Before operator, Proper scheduling all the machine and underestimating the of machine to 7 4 28 critical parts prior Hameed after machine capacity, avoid heat up to every printing every machine break down job and conduct a job sooner, spare parts not follow up after the easily available job is printed. 54
  • 55. IMPROVE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude, from supportive to opposed. Neutral List of Moder Level of Strongly (indiffere Strongly Moderately Stakeholders by ately Reason for Resistance Supporti nt or Against/ Against/ Actions dept / Individual Suppo Resistance (High, Med, ve undecide Opposed Opposed names rtive Low) d) The complaints were CEO completely internal and are very agrees with the critical in nature and this suggestions being has lead to the increasing Shaheedullah provided by the rejection rate of the job; Baray (CEO of x Project Team. As he is Low the business was facing the Company) the one, who has huge overhead costs and identified the key facing losses. Hence a problems at the detailed Six Sigma Project company was implemented upon the company After the complete analysis of the rejection rate of the He is very supportive jobs, Ahsan has got the and helpful as he urgent resolution of the AHSAN wants the company to problem and now this can (Production x Low earn more profits and be eliminated by strict Manager) provide better quality Quality control and to the customers Quality Assurance activities on each step of printing 55
  • 56. IMPROVE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude, from supportive to opposed. Neutral List of Moder Level of Strongly (indiffere Strongly Moderately Stakeholders by ately Reason for Resistance Supporti nt or Against/ Against/ Actions dept / Individual Suppo Resistance (High, Med, ve undecide Opposed Opposed names rtive Low) d) Since his job is to purchase the raw material such as ink and paper from the market, After the implementation of Six He is indifferent and Sigma at the Company, ASHRAF fears that his work Now he will have to (Purchase x Med might increase due to ensure that the best raw Manager) this. materials would be purchased. After the implementation of this, the reason of the rejection rate would not be the quality of paper or ink After the successful They are moderately Implementation of Six supportive of the HAMEED & Sigma at the Company, TQM philosophy as RIZWAN both the machine x they feel that their Med (Machine operators will have to be expertise is doubted. Operators) trained on quality control There are however, measures so that the need willing to give it a try. for reprinting is reduced. 56
  • 57. IMPROVE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude, from supportive to opposed. Neutral List of Moder Level of Strongly (indiffere Strongly Moderately Stakeholders by ately Reason for Resistance Supporti nt or Against/ Against/ Actions dept / Individual Suppo Resistance (High, Med, ve undecide Opposed Opposed names rtive Low) d) After Six Sigma Implementation, they will They are indifferent as ensure that the whole WAQAR & they say it is not their printing process will run FAZAL (Assistant x job to control quality. Med smoothly and the Machine They just do as they machines would be Operators) are told. cleaned after each job and no technical cause of print rejection occurs Waqar will ensure that the Supportive towards plates would be made WAQAR AHMED the idea, following error free and they will not x Low (Plate Maker) proper procedures of cause any problems of plate making miss or double printing or color spillage 57
  • 58. IMPROVE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude, from supportive to opposed. Neutral List of Moder Level of Strongly (indiffere Strongly Moderately Stakeholders by ately Reason for Resistance Supporti nt or Against/ Against/ Actions dept / Individual Suppo Resistance (High, Med, ve undecide Opposed Opposed names rtive Low) d) Ibrahim will ensure the whole die cutting process Ibrahim is supportive to run smoothly and error towards the idea and free. He will make sure IBRAHIM (Die x follows the standard Low that no any rejection rate Cutter) practices of die occurs due to the cutting. cutting He will ensure the quality assurance in die cutting process Mehfooz will ensure the proper binding of the jobs Supportive towards and will be involved in the the idea, so as to MEHFOOZ x Quality control process. If maintain a better level Low (Binder) he will find any miss of service in the printings during binding printing industry he will report to the higher management 58
  • 59. IMPROVE – Stakeholders‟ Analysis Your best estimate of the stakeholder's attitude, from supportive to opposed. Neutral List of Moder Level of Strongly (indiffere Strongly Moderately Stakeholders by ately Reason for Resistance Supporti nt or Against/ Against/ Actions dept / Individual Suppo Resistance (High, Med, ve undecide Opposed Opposed names rtive Low) d) The Quality inspectors Strongly supportive as Quality employed at various levels x they are employed for - Inspector(s) will ensure that all the ensuring quality processes are followed 59
  • 60. IMPROVE – Communication Matrix Audience Method Frequency Owner Sponsor – Mr. Shaheedullah Baray, Daily as required or 2-3 times a Project Face to Face CEO, Rosette Printers week Manager Stakeholder - AHSAN (Production Daily as required, At times Project Face to Face Manager) Weekly Manager Stakeholder- ASHRAF (Purchase Daily as required, At times Project Face to Face Manager) Weekly Manager Stakeholder - HAMEED & RIZWAN Daily as required, At times Project Face to Face (Machine Operators) Weekly Manager Stakeholder - WAQAR AHMED (Plate Project Face to Face Weekly Maker) Manager Project Stakeholder - IBRAHIM (Die Cutter) Face to Face Weekly Manager Project Stakeholder - MEHFOOZ (Binder) Face to Face Weekly Manager 60
  • 61. IMPROVE – Training Schedule Training Schedule - Pre Live Training Training Schedule Sr. No Pre - Live Training Program Responsibility Date 1 Orientation of the new process 17-Mar Project Manager 2 Detail description of procedures 17-Mar Project Manager 3 Departments role and responsibilities 18-Mar Project Manager 4 Process Monitoring tools 19-Mar Project Manager 5 Mini case studies 20-Mar Project Manager 6 Role Play 21-Mar Project Manager 7 Quiz on New process flow 21-Mar Project Manager Training Schedule - Post Live Training Training Schedule Sr. No Post - Live Training Program Responsibility Date 1 Discussion Sessions 22-Mar Process Owner 2 Review of Process 23-Mar Process Owner 3 Refresher Training on the Process 24-Mar Process Owner 61
  • 62. Key Findings – Lessons Learned Implementation of the solution was an interesting task since we had placed checks at every level. The CEO’s guidance and support in mapping and implementing the process was an add on. Objective measurement of the results was needed. 62
  • 64. CONTROL – Context The main objective of this area is to ensure that the entire process has close controls and is being monitored. Control is required at all levels of the new process. Number of Graphs were used to measure the effectiveness of the process. The control phase helped us to fix the process and shows the level of commitment and seriousness required at the different stages of the process Tools used in Control Phase are:  Control Chart  Control Plan 64
  • 65. CONTROL – Charts Books Calendars Cards Others Total September 12 0 3 0 15 October 13 0 0 5 18 November 13 0 5 3 21 December 16 7 1 2 26 January 15 1 3 1 20 February 14 1 1 4 20 March 13 0 5 0 18 April 17 0 0 3 20 May 15 0 2 2 19 Total 128 9 20 20 177 Histogram 1: Types of jobs printed by the company per month 30 26 25 21 20 20 20 19 20 18 18 17 15 16 15 14 15 15 12 13 13 13 10 7 5 5 4 5 5 3 3 3 3 12 1 1 11 22 0 September October November December January February March April May Books Calenders Cards Others Total 65
  • 66. CONTROL – Charts Total Jobs of Books September 12 October 13 November 13 December 16 January 15 February 14 March 13 April 17 May 15 Total 128 Histogram 2: Total number of jobs of Books in 9 months 150 128 100 50 12 13 13 16 15 14 13 17 15 0 September October November December January February March April May Total Total Jobs of Books 66
  • 67. CONTROL – Charts Rejected Jobs of Books September 5 October 4 November 2 December 3 January 4 February 5 March 1 April 2 May 1 Total 27 Histogram 3: Total number of jobs of Books rejected in 9 months 30 27 25 20 15 10 5 4 4 5 5 2 3 2 1 1 0 September October November December January February March April May Total Rejected Jobs of Books 67
  • 68. CONTROL – Charts Total Jobs of Books Rejected Jobs of Books September 12 5 October 13 4 November 13 2 December 16 3 January 15 4 February 14 5 March 13 1 April 17 2 May 15 1 Total 128 27 Histogram 4: Total number of jobs of Books and their rejection per month 180 160 140 27 120 100 80 60 128 40 5 4 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 20 0 12 13 13 16 15 14 13 17 15 September October November December January February March April May Total Total Jobs of Books Rejected Jobs of Books 68
  • 69. CONTROL – Charts Out of registration printing Ink related issues Plate related issues Picture resolution issues Total September 2 2 0 1 5 October 2 1 0 1 4 November 1 0 0 1 2 December 2 0 1 0 3 January 2 1 1 0 4 February 3 2 0 0 5 March 0 1 0 0 1 April 1 0 0 1 2 May 0 0 1 0 1 Total 13 7 3 4 27 Histogram 5: Type of defects per month 12 10 8 5 5 6 4 4 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 0 September October November December January February March April May Out of registration printing Ink related issues Plate related issues Picture resolution issues Total 69
  • 70. CONTROL – Plan („To Be‟ Process) 70
  • 71. CONTROL – Plan Control Checking Indicators Checking Item Responsibility Limit Frequency T1: Delivery of the Every time a Quality control staff, Paper sets returned to specified paper for 1 Day new job is Admin, purchase the supplier printing ordered manager Inaccurate plates Every time a Quality control staff, T2: Plate making 1 Day returned to the pre press new job is plate maker department for remaking printed Inaccuracy in ink Every time a Quality control staff, T3: Preparation of 1 Hour preparation and returned new job is machine operator, ink for re preparation printed production manager Quality control staff, After every job T4: Printing of Books being reprinted production manager, 2 Days of books are books due to inaccuracy machine operator, printed CEO T5, T6, T7: Inaccuracy in cutting, For every job Quality control staff, Cutting, Creasing creasing or binding and 1 Day of books Cutter, Binder, & Binding of returned to the post printed Assistant Binder books press department 71
  • 72. Key Findings – Lessons Learned Strict monitoring of all activities and procedures is compulsory Regular updates with machine operators, plate makers and Process House is needed to ensure that problems are identified and resolved in due time. Accurate registration of complaints Quality inspectors will have complete responsibility to ensure that the processes are followed but the employees will also have to take responsibility Training of operation staff is mandatory 72
  • 73. Key Findings – Team Lessons Learned A prerequisite for implementing Six Sigma effectively is team work All team members had to give in their time and effort to understand the entire printing process prior to starting work on Six Sigma implementation Since the CEO was our group member’s father, the data collection process was convenient Six Sigma helped in the identification of the loopholes in the process and provided a solution to reduce the errors 73
  • 74. APPENDIX Tools used in the project were: Project Plan Project Charter Process Mapping VOC to CTQ Stakeholders’ Analysis in Define Phase Data Collection Plan Measure – Various Histograms Detailed ‘As is’ Process Map Pareto Chart Fishbone Structure (Cause And Effect) ‘To be’ Process Map Solution Evaluation Matrix Stakeholders’ Analysis in Improve Phase Communication Matrix Training Schedule Control – Various Histograms Control Plan 74