Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.
THE FILMSPELER CJEU JUDGMENT
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS FOR MAKERS AND USERS OF KODI BOXES
FAST Legal Group Meeting
House of Lords...
Contents
• The right of
communication to the
public
• The CJEU reference
– Implications
• For makers
• For users
• Broader...
The right of
communication to the public
Article 3(1) InfoSoc Directive
“Member States shall provide authors with the
exclusive right to authorise or prohibit any
...
In reality
• Act of communication
– Mere making available; indispensability of
defendant’s intervention
• To a public
• Ot...
The Filmspeler case
• Liability for makers
– Indispensable intervention as facilitation
• Liability for users
– Temporary copies exemption
– R...
Broader issues
• How should the right of communication to the
public be construed?
• Facilitation as indispensable intervention: who
make...
Eleonora Rosati
eleonora@e-lawnora.com
Thanks for your attention!
Eleonora Rosati - The Filmspeler CJEU Judgment: Legal Implications for Makers and Users of Kodi Boxes
Eleonora Rosati - The Filmspeler CJEU Judgment: Legal Implications for Makers and Users of Kodi Boxes
Eleonora Rosati - The Filmspeler CJEU Judgment: Legal Implications for Makers and Users of Kodi Boxes
Nächste SlideShare
Wird geladen in …5
×

Eleonora Rosati - The Filmspeler CJEU Judgment: Legal Implications for Makers and Users of Kodi Boxes

575 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

Slides of my presentation at the FAST Legal Group Meeting, held at the House of Lords on 28 November 2017.

Veröffentlicht in: Recht
  • Als Erste(r) kommentieren

Eleonora Rosati - The Filmspeler CJEU Judgment: Legal Implications for Makers and Users of Kodi Boxes

  1. 1. THE FILMSPELER CJEU JUDGMENT LEGAL IMPLICATIONS FOR MAKERS AND USERS OF KODI BOXES FAST Legal Group Meeting House of Lords 28 November 2017 Eleonora Rosati eleonora@e-lawnora.com @eLAWnora
  2. 2. Contents • The right of communication to the public • The CJEU reference – Implications • For makers • For users • Broader issues
  3. 3. The right of communication to the public
  4. 4. Article 3(1) InfoSoc Directive “Member States shall provide authors with the exclusive right to authorise or prohibit any communication to the public of their works, by wire or wireless means, including the making available to the public of their works in such a way that members of the public may access them from a place and at a time individually chosen by them.”
  5. 5. In reality • Act of communication – Mere making available; indispensability of defendant’s intervention • To a public • Other non-autonomous, interdependent criteria
  6. 6. The Filmspeler case
  7. 7. • Liability for makers – Indispensable intervention as facilitation • Liability for users – Temporary copies exemption – Reasoning of unlawful downloads (ACI Adam, C- 435/12)
  8. 8. Broader issues
  9. 9. • How should the right of communication to the public be construed? • Facilitation as indispensable intervention: who makes an act of communication to the public? – Ziggo, C-610/15 • Relationship with other forms of liability – Secondary liability (unharmonised) – Safe harbours
  10. 10. Eleonora Rosati eleonora@e-lawnora.com Thanks for your attention!

×