Exploring the Map of Distance and e-Learning Research - a Bibliographic Analysis

Exploring the map of distance and e-learning research –
a bibliographic analysis
EDEN Research Workshop, Budapest,
25 October 2010
Olaf Zawacki-Richter
University of Oldenburg, Germany
Center for Lifelong Learning
Faculty of Educational and Social Sciences

Prof. Dr. Olaf Zawacki-Richter 2Slide / 28
Overview
 Distance Education Journals
 Validated structure of distance education research areas
 Review of research between 2000 and 2008: gaps and priority areas
 Perspectives for future research
Zawacki-Richter, O. (2009). Researchareasindistanceeducation– aDelphi study.
International Review of Research in Open and Distance
Learning, 10(3), 1-17.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Bäcker, E. M., &Vogt, S. (2009). Reviewofdistanceeducationresearch
(2000to2008)– analysisofissues, methodsandauthorshippatterns.
International Review of Research in Open and Distance
Learning, 10(6), 21-50.
Zawacki-Richter, O., &vonPrümmer, C. (2010). Genderandcollaborationpatternsin
distanceeducationresearch. Open Learning, 25(2), 95-114.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Anderson, T., &Tuncay, N. (2010). Thegrowingimpactofopenaccess
distanceeducationjournals-abibliometricanalysis. Journal of Distance
Education, 24(3).

Part I: Distance Education Journals
 What are the major journals in the field and how can they be grouped
in terms of impact and perceived quality?
 How do the journals relate to each other in a network of giving and
receiving citations?
 What are the most central and prestigious journals in the network and
which journals are peripheral or isolated?

Structure of Distance Education Journal Network
 Journals as important carriers of knowledge in a discipline
 Research builds upon and refers to previous research
 Previous research is acknowledged by citations
 Social Network Analysis (SNA): The nodes are journals and the ties
in the network are citations.
 The journal network reveals relationships and patterns of scientific
information exchange, the "intellectual structure" of a discipline
(Liu, 2007).
Liu, Z. (2007). Scholarly communication in educational psychology: a journal citation analysis.
Collection Building. doi:10.1108/01604950710831915

Selected Journals

Journal Citation Network
 Mean citation rate across all journals: 44 ("tie density")
 Standardized mean citation rate: 0.46 cites/paper

Journal Citation Network – Image Matrix
Doreian, P., & Fararo, T. J. (1985). Structural
equivalence in a journal network. Journal of
the American Society for Information Science,
36(1), 28-37.

Perceived quality
 Journal Prestige Survey: Editorial Board Members (83 of 277).
 Rating scale according to Nelson, Buss & Katzko (1983):
Please assign numbers to the journals listed below according to how
you would rate them, where 5 = outstanding, 4 = excellent, 3 = good, 2
= adequate, 1 = poor. You may leave blanks if you do not recognize a
journal.
Nelson, T. M., Buss, A. R., &Katzko, M. (1983). Ratingofscholarlyjournalsby
chairpersonsinthesocialsciences. Research in Higher Education,
19(4), 469-497.

Perceived quality and prestige

Part II: Research Areas in Distance Education
 What are the most important research areas in DE and how can they
be categorized?
 What are the most neglected research areas?

Research Areas: Delphi Study
 Expert panel: 25 individuals from 11 countries (average of 27 years of
professional experience in distance education)
 1. round: Experts were asked to list 10 important research areas
 2. round: Experts were asked to rate research areas on a scale of
importance;
What are the most neglected research areas?

Classification of Research Areas
Three broad research perspectives or levels with 15 research areas:
1.Macro level: Distance education systems and theories
→ global system level: 5 research areas
2.Meso level: Management, organisation and technology
→ institutional level: 7 research areas
3.Micro level: Teaching and learning in distance education
→ individual level: 3 research areas

Classification of Research Areas
Macro level: Distance education systems
and theories
1. Access, equity and ethics
2. Globalization of education and cross-
cultural aspects
3. Distance teaching systems and
institutions
4. Theories and models
5. Research methods in distance education
and knowledge transfer
Micro level: Teaching and learning in DE
13. Instructional design
14. Interaction and communication in learning
communities
15. Learner characteristics
Meso level: Management, organisation
and technology
6. Management and organisation
7. Costs and benefits
8. Educational technology
9. Innovation and change
10. Professional development and faculty
support
11. Learner support services
12. Quality assurance

Neglected Research Areas
 Macro level: cross-cultural aspects of transnational education
 Meso level: innovation and change management, educational
management and organisation, costs and funding of DE
 Micro level: added value of Web 2.0 applications (instructional
design)

Part III: Publication and Authorship Patterns
 What are the topics with the highest and lowest number of papers?
 What kind of research methods are applied and do DE journals prefer
to publish qualitative or quantitative studies?
 Do female and male researchers tend to choose different research
topics? If yes, what are their priority areas?
 Who are the leading authors and where do they come from?

Literature Review
 Review of articles that were published in 5 prominent DE journals
 9 years: 2000 to 2008
 N=695 (675 English, 20 French)
 Journals:
 Open Learning (UK)
 Distance Education (Australia)
 American Journal of Distance Education (USA)
 Journal of Distance Education (Canada)
 IRRODL (Canada)

Research areas and levels
13
13
24
31
62
12
13
18
23
41
41
48
113
121
122
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
7 Costs and benefits
2 Globalisation of education and
cross-cultural aspects
5 Research methods in distance
education and knowledge transfer
9 Innovation and change
6 Management and organisation
11 Learner support services
4 Theories and models
1 Access, equity and ethics
10 Professional development and
faculty support
12 Quality assurance
8 Educational technology
3 Distance teaching systems and
institutions
15 Learner characteristics
13 Instructional design
14 Interaction and communication in
learning communities
1 Macro level
2 Meso level
3 Micro level
N=695

Gender differences in research areas (single authors)
0.4%
-1.8%
-10.4%
-5.5%
-1.9%
-1.7%
-5.6%
-3.9%
-0.5%
2.5%
3.8%
-0.3%
6.0%
11.6%
7.4%
15 Learner characteristics
14 Interaction and communication in learning communities
13 Instructional design
12 Quality assurance
11 Learner support services
10 Professional development and faculty support
9 Innovation and change
8 Educational technology
7 Costs and benefits
6 Management and organisation
5 Research methods in DE and knowledge transfer
4 Theories and models
3 Distance teaching systems and institutions
2 Globalisation of education and cross-cultural aspects
1 Access, equity and ethics
preferred
by men
preferred
by women
χ2
= 38.07, df=14, p < .001
Cramer's V = .36, p < .001
N=302
159 (M)
143 (F)

Research Methods
 Trend towards more empirical research?
 Berge & Mrozowski (2000): 76 % (N=727 articles; AJDE, DE, JDE
and OL, between 1990 and 1999).
 2000-2008: 38 %

Authorship Patterns: Leading Contributors
 1,148 different authors contributed to the 695 articles in this study.
 48 authors who published at least 3 articles:
 Canada (17)
 USA (9)
 UK (8)
 Australia (5), China (5)
 Israel (2)
 Japan/South Korea (1)
 New Zealand (1)

Authorship Patterns: Countries
 The origin of the first author was taken into consideration (54 countries)
 The vast majority (>80%) comes from only 5 countries
 AJDE: strong North-American focus

So quo vadis? Perspectives for future research
 Current research is clearly dominated by studies on the micro level.
 → Major gaps were found on the macro and meso level.
 DEHub Project in Australia: http://www.dehub.edu.au/
 Research consortium between 5 Australian universities established
2009

 European research community is weaker compared to North
American institutions (research outputs in leading DE journals).
 European research agenda for the next decade.
 Clear research profile for the professional field of DE.
 EDEN: Focus Group or launch a project?!
 EURODL: better integration into the international journal network
needed

Thanks for your attention!
Olaf Zawacki-Richter, Ph. D.
Professor of Educational Technology
University of Oldenburg
Faculty of Educational and Social Sciences
Center for Lifelong Learning (C3L)
Germany
olaf.zawacki.richter@uni-oldenburg.de

Exploring the Map of Distance and e-Learning Research - a Bibliographic Analysis

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Exploring the Map of Distance and e-Learning Research - a Bibliographic Analysis

Similar to Exploring the Map of Distance and e-Learning Research - a Bibliographic Analysis (20)

More from EDEN Digital Learning Europe

More from EDEN Digital Learning Europe (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Exploring the Map of Distance and e-Learning Research - a Bibliographic Analysis

Editor's Notes