Crosscultural Leadership Assessment
•Als PPT, PDF herunterladen•
2 gefällt mir•511 views
The document discusses a study examining whether the Denison Leadership Development Survey (DLDS) can be used across different cultures. The study found that the DLDS survey fits well across cultures and provides evidence that it can reliably measure leadership qualities in different countries. Both the overall index and individual trait factors of the DLDS were found to generalize across cultures, with no significant differences found in how leadership is perceived cross-culturally.
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Andere mochten auch
Andere mochten auch (8)
Ähnlich wie Crosscultural Leadership Assessment
Ähnlich wie Crosscultural Leadership Assessment (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Crosscultural Leadership Assessment
- 1. Denison Leadership 360 Across Cultures Is the Denison Leadership Development Survey (DLDS) generalizable across regional cultures? Different cultures Most reliability and emphasize unique validity testing has been qualities in leaders. Can done on US surveys. The the DLDS be used in current study expanded different countries? across cultures. Our research provides More specifically, both evidence that, yes, the the index and trait level survey can be used with factors were found to fit confidence across the well across cultures. globe. All content and images Copyright © 2012 Denison Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
- 2. Cross-Cultural DLDS Utility Do cross-cultural differences in leadership perceptions exist? For the most part, cross- cultural differences do not exist. No significant variability in rater perceptions were found. All content and images Copyright © 2012 Denison Consulting, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Hinweis der Redaktion
- Is the Denison 360-degree assessment generalizable across regional cultures? As an organization grows and becomes global, leaders from one culture are expected to report to leaders from other cultures. With this exchange, organizations must adapt to effectively manage and develop leaders around the world. Research suggests that different cultures emphasize different qualities in leaders and so the question becomes whether or not the Denison Leadership Model can be used to assess leaders in different countries. Though reliable and valid scales of assessing 360-degree feedback reports in the United States exist, very little research has been done that measures reliability and validity across regional cultures. Without this information, it is hard to judge if leaders are being effectively assessed across different cultures. Statistical analyses suggest that the Denison Leadership Model could be used with confidence to assess diverse leaders from across the world. Second-order factors (i.e., indices) were found to fit the data better than a one-factor model (i.e., traits), as expected. Factor analysis was also conducted for each rater and cluster of regions. The DLDS was again found to fit indices across raters.
- Multisource (360-degree) feedback instruments are widely used due to the ability they have to provide unique perspectives from raters across different levels (i.e., self, supervisor, peers, and direct reports). Combining these ratings allow individuals to target which areas of leadership they are doing well in and which areas they may still need improvement. Are there any cross-cultural differences in leadership perceptions? For the most part, there are no cross-cultural differences in leadership perceptions. Results found no significant variability in terms of rater (i.e., supervisor, peer, direct-report) perceptions across cultures. Notes: Source material from Denison, D., Kotrba, L., & Castano, N (2012). A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Leadership Assessment: Comparing 360-Degree Feedback Results From Around the World. Advances in Global Leadership , 7, 199-222. doi: 10.1108/S1535-1203(2012)0000007013