Zone 4

A special thanks to these planning improvement partners:
Council of Local Mental Hygiene Directors (CLMHD)

Association of Substance Abuse Professionals (ASAP) - Prevention Committee

Council on Addictions of New York State (CANYS)

Onondaga-Cortland-Madison B.O.C.E.S.

Tompkins-Seneca-Tioga B.O.C.E.S.

NYS School Boards Association

New York State Oﬃce of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services

Division of Outcome Management and System Investment

William J. Phillips, Associate Commissioner

Bureau of Research, Epidemiology and Practice Improvement

Robert J. Gallati, Dr. Gregory A. Rainone

Division of Prevention, Recovery, Technology and Management Services

Mary Ann DiChristopher, Acting Associate Commissioner

Bureau of Prevention Services

Dr. Barry R. Donovan

The New York State Youth Development Survey was produced by International Survey Associates/Pride Surveys under a contract with the New
York State Oﬃce of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services. For more information, visit www.pridesurveys.com

Contents C MODEL PROGRAMS RELATED TO RISK AND PROTECTIVE
FACTORS 40

1 INTRODUCTION 7 D RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS DEFINITIONS 50

2 RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS 9 E COMPARISIONS OF CTC VS NYS YDS ON RISK AND
PROTECTIVE FACTORS 55
2.1 HOW TO READ THE CHARTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
F DATA TABLES 56
3 ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, AND OTHER DRUG USE 17
F.1 Risk and Protective Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
F.2 Lifetime Prevalence of Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs . . . . . 64

4 GAMBLING PREVALENCE INFORMATION 27 F.3 Past 30 Day Prevalence of Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs . . . 66

4.1 HOW TO READ THE CHARTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 F.4 Heavy Use and Antisocial Behaviors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

F.5 Average Age of First Incidence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
5 SCHOOL SAFETY ISSUES 31
F.6 Sources and Locations of Alcohol Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
F.7 Gambling Behaviors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74

6 DRUG-FREE COMMUNITIES SUPPORT PROGRAM CORE F.8 School Safety Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
MEASURES 35

APPENDICES

A SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT USING SURVEY DATA 37

A.1 What are the numbers telling you? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

A.2 How to decide if a rate is ”unacceptable.” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

A.3 Use these data for planning: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

B PREVENTION RESOURCES 39

B.1 Additional Needs Assessment Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

4

List of Tables 22 Percentage of Students Reporting Protection for Family Domain . . 61

23 Percentage of Students Reporting Protection for School Domain . . 62
1 Student Totals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
24 Percentage of Students Reporting Protection for Individual/Peer
Domain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
2 Grade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
25 Lifetime Prevalence of Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs, By Grade
3 Sex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Level and Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
4 Are you Hispanic or Latino? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
26 Lifetime Prevalence of Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs, By Grade
Level and Group (continued) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
5 Ethnic Origin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
27 Past 30 Day Prevalence of Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs, By
6 Risk Factors That Inhibit Healthy Youth Development . . . . . . . . 9 Grade Level and Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

7 Protective Factors That Promote Healthy Youth Development . . . 10 28 Past 30 Day Prevalence of Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs, By
Grade Level and Group (continued) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
8 Core Measure by Grade for Past 30 Day Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
29 Percentage of Students With Heavy Use of Alcohol and Cigarettes . 68
9 Core Measure by Grade for Perception of Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
30 Percentage of Students With Antisocial Behavior in the Past Year . 69
10 Core Measure by Grade for Parental Disapproval . . . . . . . . . . . 35
31 Average Age of First ATOD Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
11 Core Measure by Grade for Age of Onset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
32 Average Age of First Antisocial Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
12 Core Measure by Sex for Past 30 Day Use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
33 Students’ Response to ”If you drank alcohol in the past year, how
13 Core Measure by Sex for Perception of Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 did you usually get it?” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72

14 Core Measure by Sex for Parental Disapproval . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 34 Students’ Response to ”If you drank alcohol in the past year, where
did you usually drink it?” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
15 Core Measure by Sex for Age of Onset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
35 Percentage of Students Engaged in Gambling Activities . . . . . . . 74
16 Risk and Protective Factor Scale Deﬁnition . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
36 Percentage of Students Engaged in Gambling Activities (continued) 75
17 Percentage of Students Reporting Risks for Community Domain . . 56
37 Percentage of Students Engaged in Gambling Activities (continued) 76
18 Percentage of Students Reporting Risks for Family Domain . . . . . 57
38 Students’ Response to ”How many times in the past have you taken
19 Percentage of Students Reporting Risks for School Domain . . . . . 58 a handgun to school?” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

20 Percentage of Students Reporting Risks for Individual/Peer Domain 59 39 Students’ Response to ”How wrong do you think it is for someone
your age to take a handgun to school?” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
21 Percentage of Students Reporting Protection for Community Domain 60

5

List of Figures

1 Risk Factors - Grades 7-8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

2 Risk Factors - Grades 9-10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

3 Risk Factors - Grades 11-12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

4 Protective Factors - Grades 7-8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

5 Protective Factors - Grades 9-10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

6 Protective Factors - Grades 11-12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

7 Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use - Grades 7-8 . . . . . . . . . 18

8 Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use - Grades 9-10 . . . . . . . . 19

9 Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use - Grades 11-12 . . . . . . . . 20

10 No Child Left Behind Profile - Grades 7-8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

11 No Child Left Behind Profile - Grades 9-10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

12 No Child Left Behind Profile - Grades 11-12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

13 Sources and Locations of Alcohol Use - Grades 7-8 . . . . . . . . . 24

14 Sources and Locations of Alcohol Use - Grades 9-10 . . . . . . . . . 25

15 Sources and Locations of Alcohol Use - Grades 11-12 . . . . . . . . 26

16 Gambling Behaviors - Past Year - Grades 7-8 . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

17 Gambling Behaviors - Past Year - Grades 9-10 . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

18 Gambling Behaviors - Past Year - Grades 11-12 . . . . . . . . . . . 30

19 School Safety Profile - Grades 7-8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

20 School Safety Profile - Grades 9-10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

21 School Safety Profile - Grades 11-12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

6

1. INTRODUCTION Table 1: Student Totals
Response Group 2010-11
Total Students county 8,378
zone 4 2,483

This report summarizes findings from the New York State Youth Development Table 2: Grade
Survey conducted during the 2010-11 school year. The survey instrument was
2010-11
designed to assess risk and protective factors that predict substance use and other
Response Group pct n
problem behaviors such as delinquency. The survey also measures substance use,
youth gambling and other problem behaviors. In addition, grade groups and gender 7 county 18.2 1,525
comparisons often are provided as well. zone 4 20.8 516
8 county 16.7 1,402
OASAS uses a number of surveys in assessing the prevalence of substance use, zone 4 17.2 428
gambling and related problems. The YDS is especially valuable because it provides 9 county 17.2 1,440
information on risk and protective factors for school districts and county planning. zone 4 16.4 407
However, due to differences in survey design, sampling methods, months of admin- 10 county 17.1 1,433
istration and estimation methods, the substance use, gambling and other results zone 4 17.2 428
will differ somewhat across the different surveys, such as, the Youth Development 11 county 16.3 1,366
Survey conducted by ISA/PRIDE, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) con- zone 4 16.3 405
ducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and The National Survey 12 county 14.5 1,212
on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) conducted by the Substance Abuse and Mental zone 4 12.0 299
Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) as well as other OASAS Surveys.
All these surveys are used by OASAS for policy development and planning at the
state and regional levels.

Following receipt of the surveys, all survey forms were checked to determine the
validity and reliability of the data. A small percentage of students were judged
to have returned invalid survey data. For example, students who claimed to use
all drugs at the highest levels of use were eliminated from the final data set. In
total, five separate checks of the logical consistency and validity of the students’
responses were conducted.

Tables 1 thru 5 contain comparisions of your data to larger aggregates of data, if
appropriate. For instance, a school report may also contain comparison data from
all the data collected in your district and in your county.

Table 1 contains a count of the students included in this report. Table 2 provides
information on the number and percent of students surveyed at each grade level
(in order to protect student anonymity, grade levels which recorded fewer than
the required minimum number of student responses per grade are reported as 0).
Table 3 provides information on the number and percent of students surveyed by
sex. Table 4 provides information on the number and percent of students surveyed
by Hispanic status. Table 5 provides information on the number and percent of
students surveyed by race and ethnicity.

7

Table 3: Sex Table 5: Ethnic Origin
2010-11 2010-11
Response Group pct n Response Group pct n
Male county 47.2 3,839 Asian American county 2.0 163
zone 4 47.3 1,137 zone 4 1.6 40
Female county 52.8 4,288 Black or African American county 5.7 465
zone 4 52.7 1,266 zone 4 5.3 128
Native American or Alaska Native county 0.9 77
Table 4: Are you Hispanic or Latino? zone 4 0.9 23
2010-11 Native Hawaiian or Paciﬁc Islander county 0.5 38
Response Group pct n zone 4 0.3 8
No county 85.7 6,924 White county 71.3 5,866
zone 4 81.6 1,950 zone 4 68.9 1,678
Yes county 14.3 1,153 Multi Racial county 10.1 831
zone 4 18.4 439 zone 4 11.4 277
Other county 9.6 788
zone 4 11.6 282

8

2. RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS chart to indicate where at least two well designed, published research studies have
shown a link between the risk factor and the problem behavior.

Table 6: Risk Factors That Inhibit Healthy Youth Development
Risk and protective factor-focused prevention is based on a simple premise: To
prevent a problem from happening, we need to identify the factors that increase
the risk of that problem developing and then find ways to reduce the risks. Just as PROBLEM BEHAVIORS

Delinquency
medical researchers have found risk factors for heart attacks such as diets high in

Pregnancy
Substance

Drop-Out

Violence
fats, lack of exercise, and smoking, a team of researchers, the Social Development

School
Abuse

Teen
Research Group (SDRG), at the University of Washington has defined a set of risk
factors for drug abuse. The research team also found that some children exposed Risk Factors
to multiple risk factors manage to avoid behavior problems later even though they Community
were exposed to the same risks as children who exhibited behavior problems. Based Availability of Alcohol and Other Drugs
on research, the team identified protective factors and processes that work together Community Laws and Norms Favorable
to buffer children from the effects of high risk exposure and lead to the development
Toward Substance Use
of healthy behaviors. Transitions and Mobility
Low Neighborhood Attachment
Risk factors include characteristics of school, community, and family environments,
Community Disorganization
as well as characteristics of students and their peer groups that are known to predict
increased likelihood of drug use, delinquency, and violent behaviors among youth Extreme Economic Deprivation
(Hawkins, Catalano Miller, 1992; Hawkins, Arthur Catalano, 1995; Brewer, Family
Hawkins, Catalano Neckerman, 1995). Family History of the Problem Behavior
Family Management Problems
Protective factors exert a positive influence or buffer against the negative influ- Family Conflict
ence of risk, thus reducing the likelihood that adolescents will engage in problem Parental Attitudes Favorable Towards
behaviors. Protective factors identified through research reviewed by the Social
Drugs/Other Problem Behavior
Development Research Group include: Social bonding to family, school, commu-
School
nity and peers; and healthy beliefs and clear standards for behavior.
Academic Failure
Research on risk and protective factors has important implications for prevention Low Commitment to School
efforts. The premise of this approach is that in order to promote positive youth Individual/Peer
development and prevent problem behaviors, it is necessary to address those factors Early Initiation of Drug Use
that predict the problem. By measuring risk and protective factors in a population, Early Initiation of Problem Behavior
specific risk factors that are elevated and widespread can be identified and tar- Rebelliousness
geted by preventive interventions that also promote related protective factors. For Friends Who Use Drugs/
example, if academic failure is identified as an elevated risk factor in a commu-
Engage in Other Problem Behavior
nity, then mentoring and tutoring interventions can be provided that will improve
Favorable Attitudes Towards Drug Use/
academic performance, and also increase opportunities and rewards for classroom
Other Problem Behavior
participation.
Perceived Risk of Drug Use
Risk and protective factor-focused drug abuse prevention is based on the work of J. Peer Rewards for Drug Use
David Hawkins, Ph.D., Richard F. Catalano, Ph.D.; and a team of researchers at Depressive Symptoms
the University of Washington in Seattle. Beginning in the early 1980’s, the group Indicates that 2 or more epidemiological prospective studies have
researched adolescent problem behaviors and identified risk factors for adolescent found the risk factor to predict youth problem behavior.
drug abuse and delinquency. The chart below shows the links between the 16 risk
factors and the five problem behaviors. The check marks have been placed in the

9

Table 7: Protective Factors That Promote Healthy Youth Development 2.1. HOW TO READ THE CHARTS

Community 1. Brief definitions of the risk and protective factors can be found on page 50.
Community Opportunities for Prosocial Involvement
Community Rewards for Prosocial Involvement 2. The factors are grouped into 4 domains: community, family, school, and peer-
Family
individual.
Family Attachment 3. Scanning across these charts, you can easily determine which factors are most
Family Opportunities for Prosocial Involvement (or least) prevalent, thus identifying which are the most important for your
Family Rewards for Prosocial Involvement community to address.
School
4. Actual percentages are provided in the data tables in Appendix F on page 56.
School Opportunities for Prosocial Involvement The tables provide percentage figures for county and zone 4 level. The headers
School Rewards for Prosocial Involvement for each column represent the factors for each domain and the percentage
Individual/Peer figures represent the percent of students whose factor score exceeds the cutoff
Religiosity point for the particular factor. Suppose, for a specific risk factor, that the
Social Skills percentage figure for the line ”Combined” and ”County” is 42.3. That would
Belief in the Moral Order
mean that 42.3 percent of all surveyed students in the county were above the
cutoff point for that factor.
Prosocial Involvement
Peer Rewards for Prosocial Involvement 5. The bars represent the percent of students in the grouped grades who reported
elevated risk or protection.
6. Bars are complemented by a red dash. The red dash shows the comparison
from the highest aggregate level (i.e. usually county for a school report) and
provides additional information for you in determining the relative importance
of each risk or protective factor. If present, a yellow diamond shows the
comparison of the aggregate that is the next level down (usually district for a
school report).

7. A dashed line on each risk and protective factor chart represents the percentage
of youth at risk or with protection for the seven state sample upon which the
cut-points were developed. The seven states included in the norm group were
Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Oregon, Utah and Washington. This gives
you a comparison to a large multi-state baseline sample.

8. The following abbreviations are sometimes used in the tables and charts due
to space constraints:

ATOD stands for Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use.
ASB stands for Antisocial Behaviors.
PSI stands for Prosocial Involvement.

10

Percentages (%)

0
10
20
30
40
Low Neighborhood Attachment 50

High Community Disorganization

Laws and Norms Favorable to Drug Use
Community

Perceived Availability of Drugs

Poor Family Management

Family Conflict

Family History of Antisocial Behavior
Family

Parental Attitudes Favorable to ATOD

Parental Attitudes Favorable to ASB

Academic Failure
School

Low Commitment to School

Rebelliousness

Early Initiation of Drug Use

11
Early Initiation of ASB
Risk Factors - Grades 7-8

Favorable Attitudes to Drug Use

Figure 1: Risk Factors - Grades 7-8
Favorable Attitudes to ASB

Individual/Peer

Interaction with Antisocial Peers

Friends' Use of Drugs

Depressive Symptoms

Peer Rewards for Antisocial Behavior
7-State Norm

Zone 4 2010-11

County 2010-11

Percentages (%)

0
10
20
30
40
50


Community



Family Conflict

Family



Academic Failure
School


Rebelliousness


12



Individual/Peer



Depressive Symptoms

7-State Norm

Zone 4 2010-11

County 2010-11

Percentages (%)

0
10
20
30
40
50
60


Community



Family Conflict

Family



Academic Failure
School


Rebelliousness


13



Individual/Peer



Depressive Symptoms

7-State Norm

Zone 4 2010-11

County 2010-11

Percentages (%)

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Opportunities for Prosocial Involvement
Community

Rewards for Prosocial Involvement

Family Attachment

Family Opportunities for PSI
Family

Family Rewards for PSI

School Opportunities for PSI
School

School Rewards for PSI

14
Religiosity

Social Skills
Protective Factors - Grades 7-8

Figure 4: Protective Factors - Grades 7-8
Belief in a Moral Order
Individual/Peer


Peer Rewards for Prosocial Involvement
7-State Norm

Zone 4 2010-11

County 2010-11

Percentages (%)

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Community


Family Attachment

Family


School


15
Religiosity

Social Skills

Individual/Peer


7-State Norm

Zone 4 2010-11

County 2010-11

Percentages (%)

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Community


Family Attachment

Family


School


16
Religiosity

Social Skills

Individual/Peer


7-State Norm

Zone 4 2010-11

County 2010-11

3. ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, AND OTHER DRUG 3.1. HOW TO READ THE CHARTS
USE
1. Student responses for substance use and antisocial behavior questions are dis-
played by grade groupings on the following pages.
The graphs in this section of the report are six different areas of ATOD use and
2. Actual percentages are provided in the data tables in Appendix F on page 64.
Antisocial Behavior. These are:
The tables provide percentage figures for county and zone 4 level and, for stu-
dents in grades 8, 10 and 12, estimates of lifetime and past 30 days substance
Lifetime Use of ... The questions ”On how many occasions have you used ... in use from a national survey (MTF - Monitoring the Future). The headers rep-
your lifetime?” are used to measure this statistic by reporting the percentage resent the various drugs or activities and the percentage figures represent the
of students who reported any use of a particular substance in their lifetime. percent of students who responded positively to the question. For example,
for the table ”Lifetime Prevalence of Use”, if the ”Combined” and ”county”
Past 30 Day Use of ... The questions ”On how many occasions have you used ... percentage figure for a specific drug is 32.3, then 32.3 percent of all surveyed
during the past 30 days?” are used to measure this statistic by reporting the students in the county responded that they had used that drug at least once in
percentage of students who reported any use of a particular substance during their lifetime. In the case of the average age tables, the figures represent the
the past 30 days. average age of the first use of a particular drug or first incidence of a partic-
ular behavior. In the case of the average age tables, the figures represent the
Heavy Use of Alcohol and Cigarettes The questions ”How many times in the average age of the first use of a particular drug or first incidence of a particular
past two weeks have you had five or more drinks of alcohol in a row?” and behavior.
”How frequently have you smoked cigarettes during the past 30 days?” are
used to measure this statistic by reporting the percentage of students who 3. The bars represent the percent of students in the grouped grades who reported
report any binge drinking or smoking a pack or more of cigarettes per day substance use.
during the past 30 days.
4. Bars are complemented by a red dash. The red dash shows the comparison
Average Age of First Use of ATOD and Antisocial Behaviors The questions from the highest aggregate level (i.e. usually county for a school report) and
”How old were you when you first ...?” are used to measure this statistic provides additional information for you in determining the relative importance
by reporting the average age of first exhibiting the particular behavior whether of each risk or protective factor. If present, a yellow diamond shows the
it be using a particular drug or engaging in a particular behavior. The average comparison of the aggregate that is the next level down (usually district for a
is based on only those students who reported the behavior. school report).
How Students Get Alcohol and Where They Use It The questions ”How did 5. The following abbreviations are sometimes used in the tables and charts due
you usually get alcohol?” and ”Where Did You Usually Drink it?” are used to to space constraints:
measure this statistic by reporting the percentage of students for each method
of acquiring alcohol and the locations where they used alcohol. ATOD stands for Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use.
ASB stands for Antisocial Behaviors.

17

Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use - Grades 7-8

Lifetime Use Past 30 Days Heavy Use
40

30

20

10

Zone 4 2010-11

County 2010-11
0
Percentages (%)

Alcohol

Marijuana

Cigarettes

Chewing Tobacco

Prescription Drugs

OTC Cold Medicine

OTC Caffeine/Diet Pills

Inhalants

Cocaine

Heroin

Any Illicit Drug*

Alcohol

Marijuana

Cigarettes

Chewing Tobacco

Prescription Drugs

OTC Cold Medicine


Inhalants

Cocaine

Heroin

Any Illicit Drug*

Binge Drinking**

Pack of Cigarettes***
*Any Illicit Drug - all drugs except for alcohol and tobacco
**Binge Drinking - having five or more drinks in a row within the past two weeks.
***Pack of Cigarettes means smoking a pack or more per day.

Figure 7: Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use - Grades 7-8

18


70

60

50

40

30

20

10

Zone 4 2010-11

County 2010-11
0
Percentages (%)

Alcohol

Marijuana

Cigarettes

Chewing Tobacco

Prescription Drugs

OTC Cold Medicine


Inhalants

Cocaine

Heroin

Any Illicit Drug*

Alcohol

Marijuana

Cigarettes

Chewing Tobacco

Prescription Drugs

OTC Cold Medicine


Inhalants

Cocaine

Heroin

Any Illicit Drug*

Binge Drinking**



19


80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10
Zone 4 2010-11

County 2010-11
0
Percentages (%)

Alcohol

Marijuana

Cigarettes

Chewing Tobacco

Prescription Drugs

OTC Cold Medicine


Inhalants

Cocaine

Heroin

Any Illicit Drug*

Alcohol

Marijuana

Cigarettes

Chewing Tobacco

Prescription Drugs

OTC Cold Medicine


Inhalants

Cocaine

Heroin

Any Illicit Drug*

Binge Drinking**



20

No Child Left Behind Profile - Grades 7-8

Avg. Age of First ATOD Avg. Age of First ASB
20

15

10

5

Zone 4 2010-11

County 2010-11
0
Avg. Age of First Incidence

Marijuana

Cigarettes

Alcohol

Regular Alcohol Use

School Suspension

Been Arrested

Carried a Gun

Attacked to Harm

Belonged to a Gang
ATOD - Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use
ASB - Antisocial Behavior

Figure 10: No Child Left Behind Proﬁle - Grades 7-8

21


20

15

10

5

Zone 4 2010-11

County 2010-11
0

Marijuana

Cigarettes

Alcohol

Regular Alcohol Use

School Suspension

Been Arrested

Carried a Gun

Attacked to Harm

Belonged to a Gang


22


20

15

10

5

Zone 4 2010-11

County 2010-11
0

Marijuana

Cigarettes

Alcohol

Regular Alcohol Use

School Suspension

Been Arrested

Carried a Gun

Attacked to Harm

Belonged to a Gang


23

Percentages (%)

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Did not drink alcohol in the past year 90

Bought it myself with a fake ID

Bought it myself without a fake ID

Someone I know age 21 or older

Someone I know under age 21

My brother or sister

Home with my parents' permission
Source of Alcohol

Home without my parents' permission

Another relative

A stranger bought it for me

Took it from a store or shop

Other

Did not drink alcohol in the past year

24
My home

Someone else's home

Open area like a park, etc.

Sporting event or concert

Restaurant, bar, or a nightclub
Sources and Locations of Alcohol Use - Grades 7-8

Figure 13: Sources and Locations of Alcohol Use - Grades 7-8
Empty building or a construction site
Location of Acohol Use

Hotel/motel

In a car

At school
Zone 4 2010-11

County 2010-11

Percentages (%)

0
10
20
30
40
50
Did not drink alcohol in the past year 60

Bought it myself with a fake ID

Bought it myself without a fake ID

Someone I know age 21 or older

Someone I know under age 21

My brother or sister

Home with my parents' permission
Source of Alcohol

Home without my parents' permission

Another relative

A stranger bought it for me

Took it from a store or shop

Other

Did not drink alcohol in the past year

25
My home

Someone else's home

Open area like a park, etc.

Sporting event or concert

Restaurant, bar, or a nightclub
Sources and Locations of Alcohol Use - Grades 9-10

Figure 14: Sources and Locations of Alcohol Use - Grades 9-10
Empty building or a construction site
Location of Acohol Use

Hotel/motel

In a car

At school
Zone 4 2010-11

County 2010-11

Zone 4

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Zone 4

Ähnlich wie Zone 4 (20)

Zone 4