2. Objectives:
• To recognize cooperatives, cooperative
development offices, cooperative development
councils and leaders for their exemplary
performance and bringing responsive services to
their member, affiliates and the community;
• To search for models of cooperative best
practices and good governance that will serve as
start up points in establishing of benchmarks and
standards of cooperative performance;
3. Objectives:
• To drumbeat public awareness and build social
consciousness on the vital role of cooperatives and
partners in the attainment of equity, sustainable
economic development and social justice;
• To motivate other cooperatives to make more
involvement and strengthen their meaningful
participation not only as passive spectators and
beneficiaries of fruits of development and putting
them in the mainstream of development process;
and
• To document profiles of winners as reference
material for best and exemplary practices that
could be replicated in other areas.
4.
5. Target /Groups:
o Cooperatives
- Primary cooperatives
- Cooperative Federations
- Cooperative Unions
o Cooperative Leaders
o Local Government Units – Cooperative Development
Offices
- Provincial;
- Municipal/Component City; and
- Chartered City
o Cooperative Development Councils
- Regional Level
6. A. Most Outstanding Cooperatives
- Micro Scale Category
- Small Scale Category
- Medium Scale Category
- Large Scale Category
B. Most Outstanding Cooperative
Leader
Categories of Awards
7. Categories of Awards
C. Best Performing Cooperative
Federation
- In terms of Membership Expansion
D. Best Performing Cooperative Union
- In terms of Support Members in the
Compliance of Training Requirements
8. E. Best Performing Local Government Units
– Cooperative Development Offices
- Exemplary Performance in Providing
Support Services To Cooperatives
Categories of Awards
9. F. Best Performing Cooperative
Development Council
- As effective coordinating body in the
implementation of various cooperative
programs and projects.
Categories of Awards
10. G. Special Citations
- Exemplary Environmental Protection and
Conservation Program
- Outstanding Community Involvement
and Development Program
- Excellence in Membership Growth and
Expansion Program
- Remarkable Cooperative Solidarity and
Partnership Program
11. SCREENING OF COMMITTEES
A. Regional Level
- Regional Screening committee (RSC)
- Regional Board of Judges (RBOJ)
B. National Level:
- National Screening Committee
+ Technical Working Committee (TWC)
+ Program Management Committee(PMC)
- National Board of Judges (NBOJ)
12. Regional Level
• REGIONAL SCREENING COMMITTEE
- CDA Assistant Regional Director shall sit as the
Chairperson
- Technical Representatives of Regional Offices of
the following agencies:
+ Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP)
+ Department of Agriculture (DA)
+ Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)
+ Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR)
-Technical Representative of Academe/SUC
(selection is at option of CDA-EO)
- Technical Representative of Non-Government
Organization (NGO) or Private Sector
Representative
13. Regional Level
• REGIONAL BOARD OF JUDGES
- CDA Regional Director shall sit as the Chairperson
- Head of the Regional Offices of the following
agencies :
+ Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP)
+ Department of Agriculture (DA)
+ Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)
+ Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR)
- Regional Head of Academe/SUC (selection is at
option of CDA-EO)
- Head of Non-Government Organization (NGO) or
Private Sector Representative
14. National Level
Member Agencies of the National Screening Committee
1. Cooperative Development Authority (CDA)
2. Senate Committee on Cooperatives
3. House Committee on Cooperatives
4. Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP)
5. Department of Agriculture (DA)
6. Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR)
7. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)
8. Phil. Association of State Colleges and Universities
(PASUC)
9. Meralco Foundation/ABS-CBN
Foundation/GMA Foundation/Villar
Foundation/Manila Water Foundation
15. National Level
National Screening Committee
A. Technical Working Committee (TWC)
Head: IDD Director
Members are representative from:
1. Cooperative Development Authority (CDA)
CRITD, CPDAD, REGISTRATION, FINANCE, SELECTED EOs
2. Senate Committee on Cooperatives
3. House on committee on Cooperatives
4. Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP)
5. Department of Agriculture (DA)
6. Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR)
7. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)
8. Polytechnic University of the Philippines (PUP)
9. Meralco Foundation/ABS-CBN Foundation/GMA
Foundation/Villar Foundation/Manila Water Foundation
16. National Level
National Screening Committee
B. Program Management Committee (PMC)
Sub-Committees:
i. Cooperatives: Adm. M. Castillo;
Executive Director- CPDAD
Chief; Registration Division Chief
ii. Leaders : Adm. E. Castillo;
LRD Director; Planning Div. Chief
iii. LGU-CDO: Adm. N. Alindogan; Deputy Exec.
Director; Legal Division Chief
iv. Cooperative Devt. Councils: Adm. Disimban:
Finance Division Chief; Supervision and
Examination Unit Head
CRITD shall be the secretariat of the PMC.
17. National Level
• NATIONAL BOARD OF JUDGES
Chairperson – CDA Chairperson
Members:
1. Chair, Senate Committee on Cooperatives
2. Chair, House Committee on Cooperatives
3. Representative, DAR
4. Representative, DA
5. Representative, DTI
6. Representative, LBP
7. President, PASUC
8. Chairpersons of the Foundations/ NGOs
18. Functions of the Committees & the
BOJ
• Screening Committee (Regional/Provincial levels)
Ensures the integrity of evaluation process for the
outstanding cooperatives, CDOs, CDCs and leaders
by thorough reviewing the documents and validating
the same and making recommendations to the
Board of Judges.
• Regional Board of Judges (NBOJ)
Decides and declares the winners for each category
19. National Screening Committee
A. Technical Working Committee (TWC)
Ensures the integrity of evaluation for the
outstanding cooperatives, CDOs, CDCs and
leaders by thorough reviewing the documents
and validating the same and making
recommendations to the Program
Management Committee
20. National Screening Committee
B. Program Management Committee (PMC)
• Assesses the contenders based on the
presentations made by the TWC;
• Selects and decides the finalists for each category;
• Presents and recommends to the National Board of
Judges
C. National Board of Judges (NBOJ)
Decides and declares the winners for each category
at the national level
21. Procedures for Determining the
Awardees - Cooperatives
1. The CDA extension office shall come up with
the list of potential nominees for primary
cooperatives, federations and unions which
shall be derived from the database of the
Authority;
2. The extension Office shall notify the concerned
cooperatives and direct them to prepare
and submit the necessary documents for the
competition;
22. 3. The regional Screening Committee shall evaluate the
documents pertinent to the qualified cooperatives that
respond to the notice given;
4. The extension office shall endorse to the TWC the
qualified with the following ratings
• 50%-Micro
• 60%- small
• 70%- medium
• 80%- large
Procedures for Determining the
awardees
23. 5. The TWC shall evaluate the documents submitted by
the extension offices and the validate the veracity of the
documents and information pertinent to the qualified
entries and submit the results of validation of the
Program Management Committee (PMC)
6. The TWC shall present the results of the evaluation and
validation to the sub-committees for the selection of
the finalists to each category;
7. PMC Head or sub-committee representatives shall
present the results of the finalists to the BOJ:
Procedures for determining the
awardees, leaders, CDOs and CDCs
24. 8. Only one member of the sub-committee shall be
present during the BOJ meeting who shall present
the result;
9. The TWC shall also be present during the BOJ
meeting to provide technical support to the Sub-
committee representative presenting the result
10. The PMC shall come up with the short list of
national finalist for each category for submission
and preparation to the National Board of Judges
(NBOJ);
11. The NBOJ shall proclaim the winners for each
category.
Procedures for determining the
awardees, leaders, CDOs and CDCs
25. 1. The leaders, CDOs and CDCs must be nominated by
a person or persons in an organization/s as
identified in the qualifying criteria for each
category;
2. The accomplished nomination form together with
the documentary requirements must be submitted
to the Extension Office where the nominee
reside/located;
3. The Regional Screening Committee shall evaluate
the documents pertinent to the nominees;
Procedures for determining the
awardees, leaders, CDOs and CDCs
26. 4. The Regional Screening Committee (RSC) shall
recommend to the Regional Board of Judges the
finalist for each category.
Required points as finalist: 70%
5. The Regional Board of Judges shall proclaim the
winners for each category.
6. The RSC shall endorse to the TWC the Regional
Winner (1st only)
Procedures for determining the
awardees, leaders, CDOs and CDCs
27. Procedures for determining the
awardees, leaders, CDOs and CDCs
7. The TWC shall evaluate the documents submitted
by the extension offices and validate the veracity of
documents and information pertinent to the
qualified entries and submit the results of validation
to the Program Management Committee (PMC);
8. The PMC shall come up with the short list of
national finalist for each category for submission to
the National Board of Judges (NBOJ);
9. The NBOJ shall proclaim the winners for each
category
28. NOTE:
Composition of the National Board of Judges for
Cooperative Leaders
The Board of Judges shall be chosen from
among cooperators who have distinguished
qualifications and achievements in the field of
cooperatives and public service.
The Board of Judges shall be composed of five
(5) persons to be nominated by the CDA and
partner organizations.
29. Encoded for
Josefina B. Bitonio
OIC Director
Encoder
Eric Justine R. Ancheta
OJT – University of Luzon
Summer 2014