SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
Download to read offline
Quality Assurance

The next Evolution -
Traditional Quality Assurance
• Completed by Supervisors/team
  leads or dedicated QA Department,
• Focus on primarily or exclusively
  voice calls,
• Monitoring 3-5 calls per agent per
  month,
• Targeted monitors not completed
  frequently,
• Often a mini performance review,
Risks of Traditional Quality
• Limited if any training of assessors,
• Incomplete- targeted monitors not completed,
• Each assessor scores differently,
• Performance review model shifts focus to catching
  bad behaviour, and absence of center wide quality
  view
• Biased and/or subjective assessments,
• Not statistically valid sample,
Quality Continuum




Immature Center           Mature Center
Comparison of QA Approaches
       Traditional
Benefits of
                                Objectivity




                   Coaching&
                                CSAT
                                              Consistency
                  Improvement

                                ESAT


                                Timeliness




• Objectivity, Consistency, Timeliness &
  Internal Focus on Coaching & Improvement
  Initiatives
Benefits of                  - Objectivity
• Objectivity
  – No Biases – meritocratic approach
  – Role of Evaluator conflicts with role of Coach
     • Meyer, Kay and French (I965)
  – Evaluations not used to reward effort
  – Evaluations only reflect performance vs
    Standards
Benefits of              – Consistency
• All evaluators monitor the same way
• All standards documented in detail
• Examples of behavior that meets, exceeds
  and falls below standards well documented.
Benefits of               - Timeliness
• Close enough to the event that the Agent
  remembers the experience
• Coaching should happen immediately to
  effectively improve performance.
Benefits of     – Coaching,
         Improvements
• Acting on the results of monitoring, the internal
  resources can focus on:
   – Coaching for performance improvement
   – Introducing improvement initiatives.
                           – To –
   Increase Client/Customer Satisfaction

   Increase Profit
• Coaching direction provided to meet the
  next level
Read our Case Study
For more information call us at 877-979-8692
or email us
John Cockerill - President x 201
jcockerill@thetaylorreachgroup.com
Colin Taylor – CEO x 200
ctaylor@thetaylorreachgroup.com

More Related Content

More from Colin Taylor

More from Colin Taylor (8)

Taylor Reach Credentials
Taylor Reach CredentialsTaylor Reach Credentials
Taylor Reach Credentials
 
Customer Reach<sup>®</sup> May 2009
Customer Reach<sup>®</sup> May 2009Customer Reach<sup>®</sup> May 2009
Customer Reach<sup>®</sup> May 2009
 
April 09 Newsletter Online Final
April 09 Newsletter Online FinalApril 09 Newsletter Online Final
April 09 Newsletter Online Final
 
Motivating Without Money Cpa
Motivating Without Money   CpaMotivating Without Money   Cpa
Motivating Without Money Cpa
 
Contact Center Leadership Strategies
Contact Center Leadership StrategiesContact Center Leadership Strategies
Contact Center Leadership Strategies
 
Attrition Management
Attrition ManagementAttrition Management
Attrition Management
 
Icsa Trg Dec 2006 Narrowing The Gap
Icsa   Trg Dec 2006  Narrowing The GapIcsa   Trg Dec 2006  Narrowing The Gap
Icsa Trg Dec 2006 Narrowing The Gap
 
TRG RFP IP PBX Template
TRG RFP IP PBX TemplateTRG RFP IP PBX Template
TRG RFP IP PBX Template
 

Outsourced Quality Monitoring

  • 2. Traditional Quality Assurance • Completed by Supervisors/team leads or dedicated QA Department, • Focus on primarily or exclusively voice calls, • Monitoring 3-5 calls per agent per month, • Targeted monitors not completed frequently, • Often a mini performance review,
  • 3. Risks of Traditional Quality • Limited if any training of assessors, • Incomplete- targeted monitors not completed, • Each assessor scores differently, • Performance review model shifts focus to catching bad behaviour, and absence of center wide quality view • Biased and/or subjective assessments, • Not statistically valid sample,
  • 5. Comparison of QA Approaches Traditional
  • 6. Benefits of Objectivity Coaching& CSAT Consistency Improvement ESAT Timeliness • Objectivity, Consistency, Timeliness & Internal Focus on Coaching & Improvement Initiatives
  • 7. Benefits of - Objectivity • Objectivity – No Biases – meritocratic approach – Role of Evaluator conflicts with role of Coach • Meyer, Kay and French (I965) – Evaluations not used to reward effort – Evaluations only reflect performance vs Standards
  • 8. Benefits of – Consistency • All evaluators monitor the same way • All standards documented in detail • Examples of behavior that meets, exceeds and falls below standards well documented.
  • 9. Benefits of - Timeliness • Close enough to the event that the Agent remembers the experience • Coaching should happen immediately to effectively improve performance.
  • 10. Benefits of – Coaching, Improvements • Acting on the results of monitoring, the internal resources can focus on: – Coaching for performance improvement – Introducing improvement initiatives. – To – Increase Client/Customer Satisfaction Increase Profit • Coaching direction provided to meet the next level
  • 11. Read our Case Study For more information call us at 877-979-8692 or email us John Cockerill - President x 201 jcockerill@thetaylorreachgroup.com Colin Taylor – CEO x 200 ctaylor@thetaylorreachgroup.com