Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.
Multi-resolution Data Communication in
Wireless Sensor Networks
Frieder Ganz, Payam Barnaghi, Francois Carrez
Centre for C...
Sensors
2
3
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN)
Sink
node
Gateway
Core network
e.g. InternetGateway
End-user
Computer services
- The netw...
4
Image courtesy: the Economist
5
Data Processing
WSN
WSN
WSN
WSN
WSN
Network-enabled
Devices
Network-enabled
Devices
Network
services/storage
and process...
Data aggregation and reduction
methods
− The Symbolic Aggregate Approximation (SAX) is a widely used
dimensionality reduct...
Data aggregation and reduction
methods
1. SAX uses z-normalisation (left: original data blue,
normalised green)
2. Then it...
Symbolic Aggregate Approximation
Symbolic Aggregate Approximation
Symbolic Aggregate Approximation
The constant relation between input length n and output length m lead
to a fixed reduced ...
Multi Resolution Data Communication
− A variable granularity selection is required that selects
the right window length ba...
Multi Granularity
− Using SAX we can define different window/string size;
but what is the best choice?
W1
W2
W3
…
Size =m1...
Window Selection
− Maximum:
− A higher boundary of historical data is identified. If the observed
data in the current fram...
Window Selection
− Mean:
− Taking the average to select the granularity will result in a higher
granularity data values th...
Multi Resolution Data Communication
− Which method suits sensor data?
− To select a method we compare the similarity of th...
Multi Resolution Data Communication
Deciding on the window length
− How to represent the different window lengths?
− To reconstruct the data, the window lengt...
Implementation results
− We run our method on a data set consisting of 55000 samples.
− Based on the variance a different ...
Correlation and data size evaluation
Conclusions
− We use a SAX based technique to reduce the size of data
communication from WSN nodes to the gateways.
− The ...
Q&A
− Thank you.
− CityPulse Project:
− http://www.ict-citypulse.eu/
− Twitter: @ictcitypulse
− Supported by:
Nächste SlideShare
Wird geladen in …5
×

Multi-resolution Data Communication in Wireless Sensor Networks

1.255 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

Veröffentlicht in: Bildung
  • Login to see the comments

  • Gehören Sie zu den Ersten, denen das gefällt!

Multi-resolution Data Communication in Wireless Sensor Networks

  1. 1. Multi-resolution Data Communication in Wireless Sensor Networks Frieder Ganz, Payam Barnaghi, Francois Carrez Centre for Communication Systems Research (CCSR) University of Surrey Guildford, United Kingdom 1 Seoul, Korea, March 2014
  2. 2. Sensors 2
  3. 3. 3 Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) Sink node Gateway Core network e.g. InternetGateway End-user Computer services - The networks typically run Low Power Devices - Consist of one or more sensors, could be different type of sensors (or actuators)
  4. 4. 4 Image courtesy: the Economist
  5. 5. 5 Data Processing WSN WSN WSN WSN WSN Network-enabled Devices Network-enabled Devices Network services/storage and processing units Data collections and processing within the networks Gateway Gateway
  6. 6. Data aggregation and reduction methods − The Symbolic Aggregate Approximation (SAX) is a widely used dimensionality reduction mechanism for time-series data. − However, time-series != time-series as they can have a variety of different application domains. SAX was firstly developed for static databases; however in this work we extend it for the use in sensor domain applications − SAX consists of two steps: − the aggregation phase, using Piecewise Aggregate Approximation (PAA) and − the discretisation of the aggregated data. − This work limits the extension to the PAA phase.
  7. 7. Data aggregation and reduction methods 1. SAX uses z-normalisation (left: original data blue, normalised green) 2. Then it reduces the data to a vector of a smaller length by taking the mean of each window. (left below: mean values) 3. And finally discretising the data based on the Gaussian distribution into SAX words represented as strings according to the quartiles of the data. (right below)
  8. 8. Symbolic Aggregate Approximation
  9. 9. Symbolic Aggregate Approximation
  10. 10. Symbolic Aggregate Approximation The constant relation between input length n and output length m lead to a fixed reduced window size.
  11. 11. Multi Resolution Data Communication − A variable granularity selection is required that selects the right window length based on the data activity. − How to measure and quantify data activity? − To measure the activity in the data we pre-selected four statistical methods that can give insights about the activity in the data, i.e. variability measured as variance, maximum, minimum and the mean. − Each of these has advantages and disadvantages that can lead to different interpretation.
  12. 12. Multi Granularity − Using SAX we can define different window/string size; but what is the best choice? W1 W2 W3 … Size =m1 Size =m2 Size =m3
  13. 13. Window Selection − Maximum: − A higher boundary of historical data is identified. If the observed data in the current frame is close to or higher than maximum m, high granularity is sent. − However, the application of this method is only useful for the data that has interesting outliers that have a magnitude higher than a certain threshold; for example, this could be applied to presence data where presence could be identified using local maxima. − Minimum: − Selecting m based on the minimum has the same applications as choosing the maximum value discussed above; − however it is applicable where a higher granularity should be achieved for small values.
  14. 14. Window Selection − Mean: − Taking the average to select the granularity will result in a higher granularity data values that are stationary around a certain value. This reduces the granularity in cases where there are many outliers. − Variance: − The variability measure defines how far values are spread out. This can be used to create a higher granularity in values that are more distant to the mean of the data. − This includes the features of the min, max approaches. However, it does not favour values that are around the mean. − In this work, we assume that the values away from the mean are more interesting and those values should be represented with a higher granularity then data that is close to the mean.
  15. 15. Multi Resolution Data Communication − Which method suits sensor data? − To select a method we compare the similarity of the original and reconstructed dataset by using Pearson correlation and also compare the size of the original and reconstructed datasets. − By choosing the variance as the selection method, the dataset is reduced by 36% with a correlation factor of 0.94. − For mean 27% and 0.95; − For max 0.68% and 0.92; − And for min 29% and 0.99 respectively. − Reduction and reconstruction strongly depend on the underlying dataset
  16. 16. Multi Resolution Data Communication
  17. 17. Deciding on the window length − How to represent the different window lengths? − To reconstruct the data, the window lengths of each segment has to be known as there is no constant window length anymore. Therefore we introduce a multi resolution message that reflects the different window length.
  18. 18. Implementation results − We run our method on a data set consisting of 55000 samples. − Based on the variance a different window size is chosen as shown below:
  19. 19. Correlation and data size evaluation
  20. 20. Conclusions − We use a SAX based technique to reduce the size of data communication from WSN nodes to the gateways. − The method uses a variance function and variable set of window sizes. − For data with higher activity, smaller window sizes are chosen (assuming the SAX pattern size is fixed). − For data with less activity larger window size is chosen. − The initial thresholds are defined by processes a set of existing samples. − We have presented the evaluation results based on the size and correlation evaluation on a sample streaming sensor data set. − Limitations and future work: − Changing is the size of SAX patterns (variable string size) − Adjusting the thresholds over the time − Deciding on the number and size of the windows based on the characteristics of the data.
  21. 21. Q&A − Thank you. − CityPulse Project: − http://www.ict-citypulse.eu/ − Twitter: @ictcitypulse − Supported by:

×