1. All questions are worth 20 points:
When is hearsay evidence admissible in court?
For this question, you must search for an interpret information in a cybercrime case that dealt
with admitting hearsay evidence in criminal or civil court. Provide a brief description of the case
and discuss the role of hearsay evidence in it. You should be able to identify how or why the
evidence was admissible or inadmissible. Within your analysis, do not forget to identify and
include other types of evidence presented in the case (e.g. direct, circumstantial, etc.). Finally,
discuss the impact of the challenges to the authenticity of the evidence on the outcome of the
case.
How do the ECPA and the USA Patriot Act regulate the interception of electronic
communications, government access to those communications, and government access to ISP
records?
Is all evidence that is illegally searched and seized inadmissible in court? Why do you think this
is the case?
How is the "reasonable expectation of privacy" test applied to computers?
APA FORMAT
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS