Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.

Learning and action for gender transformative CSA

123 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

An overview of the research, activities, and technology which increase understanding of gender transformative climate-smart agriculture.

Veröffentlicht in: Wissenschaft
  • Als Erste(r) kommentieren

  • Gehören Sie zu den Ersten, denen das gefällt!

Learning and action for gender transformative CSA

  1. 1. Gender and Social Incluson Meeting April 1-2, 2019 Learning and Action for Gender- Transformative CSA
  2. 2. Purpose and objectives Assess opportunities and identify ways forward for gender- transformative climate-smart agriculture through knowledge sharing on gender outcomes in CCAFS research across regions and flagships. • Sub-objective 1: Workshop of CCAFS scientists involved in key gender research to share from experiences, including lessons learned for gender transformation. • Sub-objective 2: Application of framework for gender-in-CSA to highlight enabling factors and indicate next steps for gender- transformative CCAFS research. • Sub-objective 3: Development of action plan for future CCAFS gender research and (potentially) agreement on an outline and process for a funding proposal.
  3. 3. Sophia Huyer, Tatiana Gumucio, Bruce Campbell, Helen Greatrex, Nitya Chanana, Laura Cramer, Mary Nyasimi Gender Transformation in Climate- Smart Agriculture: A Framework for Action
  4. 4. What is CSA? • Lipper et al, 2014: an approach to address climate impacts on agriculture, in three main areas of food security, adaptation and mitigation – and gender transformation – a necessary factor for accomplishing the CSA goals; • It addresses synergies and trade-offs among these to promote sustainable agricultural production, increased incomes, food and nutrition security, resilience to climate change; and reduced emissions from agriculture. • Multiple strategies / approaches: development of technologies and practices, climate change models and scenarios, information technologies, insurance, value chains, and the strengthening of institutional and political enabling environments.
  5. 5. What is gender transformation in agriculture? • Empowerment, at the individual level challenges power relations, formal and informal rules and practices that constrain opportunities,  includes increased control over assets, resources, and knowledge.  Individual women, through increased agency, increase their bargaining power in both public and personal lives (Sen 1997; Batliwala 1994; Moser 2017).  A result of gender equality – “equivalent to” • Gender transformation is large scale structural changes that result from individual empowerment of women in gender and social power relations, and which usher in full economic and political participation (Moser 2017)
  6. 6. Women’s empowerment and gender transformation in the context of climate change and agriculture Components Recognition & agency Distribution of resources Opportunities Decision making Galiè, A., Jiggins, J., Struik, P. C., Grando, S., & Ceccarelli, S. (2017). “Women’s empowerment through seed improvement and seed governance: Evidence from participatory barley breeding in pre-war Syria.” NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 81, 1–8. Van Eerdewijk, et al. 2017. A Conceptual Model of Women and Girls’ Empowerment. Edited by KIT. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute (KIT). Institutional structures Cole, S.M., Kantor, P., Sarapura, S., Rajaratnam, S. (2014). Gender-transformative approaches to address inequalities in food, nutrition and economic outcomes in aquatic agricultural systems (AAS-2014-42). Penang, Malaysia. Kantor, P., Morgan, M., & Choudhury, A. (2015). Amplifying Outcomes by Addressing Inequality: The Role of Gender-transformative Approaches in Agricultural Research for Development. Gender, Technology and Development, 19(3), 292–319. Access to resources Van Eerdewijk et al, 2017 Cole et al, 2014 Women as actors / collective action Kantor et al, 2017 Cole et al, 2014 Van Eerdewijk et al, 2017 Technology Huyer, S. (2016), “Closing the Gender Gap in Agriculture.” Gender, Technology and Development (20) 2; Kantor et al, 2017. Capabilities TBC
  7. 7. Where does technology fit into this? • Need for a conceptual approach to a gender-transformative approach to technology • Relates to the CGIAR IDOs – Gender-equitable control of and access to productive resources; and technologies to reduce women’s labour burden • Women adopt and benefit from it less than men for a range of reasons:  profitability, suitability, planning and research processes overlook women’s activities and preferences (Ragosa, 2012)  lack of resources to buy or implement technology; lack of access to information or training through extension, ICT, or other means; and education level (Jost et al 2016; Huyer 2016; Cohen et al 2016)  infrastructure, land ownership, education and the number of extension visits (Tanellari et al 2014)  lack of technology available for women’s activities (Carr & Hartl 2010; van Koppen 2012; Murray et al 2016)
  8. 8. What is gender-transformative technology? • Technology design and implementation needs to build and respond to women’s knowledge, priorities and perspectives  Laser land levelling (Aryal et al 2015)  Rice drum seeders (Khan et al 2016) • Women’s knowledge and innovative capacity make important contributions to climate-resilient agriculture  Better fodder for animals to increase milk production, larger pots for washing rice (Shaw & Kristjanson 2013)  Honduras eco-stoves and improved agroforestry management systems (Hottle, 2015) • Enables women to develop new opportunities • Reduced labor burdens lead to freedom to choose new activities (Alkire et al. 2013)
  9. 9. Policy&institutional change CSAimplementation Foster coherence between climate and agricultural policiesIncrease local institutional effectiveness Build evidence on what works in CSA The Lipper framework for climate-smart agriculture Link climate and agricultural finance Based on Lipper et al, 2014
  10. 10. Global National Landscape / region Community Farm Household ♀♂ ♀♂♀♂ Policy&institutionalchange CSAimplementation Promote women’s enhanced voice in policy-making and governance at all levels Greater exercise of agency for W&M Gender equal access & control over resources Field-based evidence on what works for GE and women’s empowerment Close gender inequalities in access, use and benefit from institutions and services Build mechanisms to engender finance Increase local institutional effectiveness Build evidence on what works in CSA Foster coherence between climate & agricultural policies Link climate and agricultural finance Gender equal benefits from technology Institutional structures that promote opportunities for W&M Gender empowerment and CSA
  11. 11. Key research on gender-transformative CSA • Kristjanson, Patricia, Elizabeth Bryan, Quinn Bernier, Jennifer Twyman, Ruth Meinzen-Dick, Caitlin Kieran, Claudia Ringler, Christine Jost, and Cheryl Doss. 2017. “Addressing Gender in Agricultural Research for Development in the Face of a Changing Climate: Where Are We and Where Should We Be Going?” International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 15 (5). • Jost, Christine, Florence Kyazze, Jesse Naab, Sharmind Neelormi, James Kinyangi, Robert Zougmore, Pramod Aggarwal, et al. 2016. “Understanding Gender Dimensions of Agriculture and Climate Change in Smallholder Farming Communities.” Climate and Development 8 (2): 1–12. • Special issue on Gender, Agriculture and Climate Change, in Gender, Technology and Development (20) 2, 2016 • Twyman, J, M Green, Q Bernier, P Kristjanson, S Russo, A Tall, E Ampaire, et al. 2014. “Adaptation Actions in Africa: Evidence That Gender Matters.” Copenhagen, Denmark: CGIAR Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security Programme.
  12. 12. • Khatri-Chhetri, A., Regmi, P.P., Chanana, N. et al. Potential of climate-smart agriculture in reducing women farmers’ drudgery in high climatic risk areas – Climatic Change (2019) Hariharan, V.K., Mittal, S., Rai, M. et al. Does climate-smart village approach influence gender equality in farming households? A case of two contrasting ecologies in India, Climatic Change (2018) • Gutierrez-Montes, I., Arguedas, M., Ramirez-Aguero, F. et al. Contributing to the construction of a framework for improved gender integration into climate-smart agriculture projects monitoring and evaluation: MAP-Norway experience. Climatic Change (2018)
  13. 13. 1. Building the evidence on gender- transformative CSA • There is a gender gap in agriculture as it relates to climate change • Men and women are exposed to different climate shocks and experience different impacts • They have similar perceptions of climate change impacts, but differing capabilities to adapt • Lower levels of access to resources and information and less stable land tenure access, restricting their ability to act on and implement climate adaptation practices in agriculture • Largely neglected by agriculture and climate information service providers, and when they do have access to information, have less capacity to implement it
  14. 14. 1. Building the evidence on gender- transformative CSA - Knowledge gaps • Need better understanding of household and village labour roles in relation to CSA technologies and practices, so that they decrease women’s labour loads and become more attractive to women • the role of participatory approaches in understanding differences among women and traditionally under-represented groups and building capacity of researchers and development implementers to do so • What is the role of women’s organizations and collective action in providing a platform for empowerment in relation to CSA; and • CSA approaches that take into account indigenous knowledge, technology and practices of women across a broad range of socio- economic, environmental and cultural contexts.
  15. 15. 2. Institutions and services for gender- transformative CSA • Enhancing adaptive capacity through access to assets, including information. • Wide range of institutions, from climate-specific (e.g. access to heat-tolerant crop varieties) to much broader approaches, such as social protection, health and nutrition. • Women tend to interact with informal, local-level and family or social based networks, while men have greater access to formalized institutions such as governments, extension, and international NGOs (Perez et al, 2015; Cramer et al, 2016). • Women are not well-served by agro- and climate information services (Tall et al, 2014; Partey et al, 2018) • What is the role of information and knowledge? How can institutions and services meet the needs of women better?
  16. 16. 3. Promoting women’s participation in decision making and policy • Gender is not well integrated into climate change policy at national or global levels (Hemmati and Rohr, 2009; UNDP 2015; Gumucio and Rueda, 2015; Pham et al, 2016) • Many gaps in representation at local and community levels as well • Questions: how can policy take into account gender aspects of climate change and agriculture, and how can women influence climate policy formulation (Gumucio and Rueda, 2017)? • How to work with local level organizations to increase women’s leadership, both women-focused and mainstream (Mello and Schmink, 2017) ?
  17. 17. 4. Engendering climate finance mechanisms • Little attention to gender in climate finance at global and local levels (Schatalek, 2014 ; Wong, 2016) • Lack of access to finance is one of the major barriers to women’s adaptation to climate change in agriculture (Owombo et al 2014). • Constraints of financial literacy, collateral, land ownership, education, household decision making • Need for more gender impact assessment of climate finance access models • Index insurance is one option where women do participate (Clarke and Kumar, 2016; Bageant and Barrett 2016), • What is the role of collective finance organizations at the village / sub-national level (ILRI, 2017), Women’s Banks?
  18. 18. Questions for CCAFS gender research • Where does CCAFS current /planned set of research / outcomes fit in the gender transformation framework? • What are the gaps? • What gaps can CCAFS reasonably expect to fill? • What kinds of partnerships are needed to fill gaps and/or get to gender transformation? • What are the scaling strategies to use?
  19. 19. Thank you JL Urrea (CCAFS)