SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 81
RISK STRATIFICATION IN UA
AND NSTEMI :WHY AND HOW?
                 -Dr.DEV PAHLAJANI
                     MD,FACC,FSCAI
 HOD INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY BREACH CANDY HOSPITAL,
     CONS.CARDIOLOGIST B.NANAVATI HOPSITAL MUMBAI
ACS is an Important Manifestation of
         Atherothrombosis1
                                               Plaque
                                               rupture


             Stable         UA                Non-           Q-wave
Old term     angina                         Q-wave MI          MI



New term Atherothrombosis         UA/NSTEMI                  STEMI
                      Days–                     Minutes–
                      weeks                     hours


                      Antithrombotic        Thrombolysis
                        therapy             primary PCI



           UA=unstable angina; NSTEMI=non-ST-segment elevation
           myocardial infarction; PCI=percutaneous coronary intervention

                                              1. Cannon CP. J Thromb Thrombolysis 1995; 2: 205–218.
Our current understanding of unstable coronary syndromes is that
 they include a spectrum of disease and begin with a coronary
 plaque rupture1
The degree of thrombus occlusion determines the severity of the
 clinical syndrome, with total occlusion in ST-segment elevation MI
 (STEMI) or severe (90%) stenosis in patients with non-ST-segment
 elevation MI (NSTEMI) or unstable angina (UA)1
In addition, it is worthwhile to note that 99% of all plaque
 ruptures are clinically silent. A small degree of rupture leads to a
 small thrombus, which heals over, leading to the progression of a
 plaque1
This current understanding of how atherosclerosis progresses
 emphasizes the key role that acute and chronic antithrombotic
 therapy plays in all patients with unstable coronary syndromes1

                                                                    • Reference
                         • 1. Cannon CP. J Thromb Thrombolysis 1995; 2: 205−218.
Acute coronary syndromes:
             Prognostic spectrum
   Unstable angina
•   New onset exertional angina
•   Progressive angina
•   Rest pain without EKG changes
•   Rest pain with EKG changes
•   Rest pain troponin+
   Non ST elevation MI (NSTEMI)
   Acute ST segment elevation MI
Coronary
occlusion & short
term death             Least        Greatest
Objectives of stratification

 Can We Identify Patients At Low,
  Intermediate And High Risk Of Short
     Term And Long Term Macce?

 Will It Help To Guide Treatment For
           Better Outcome?
The TIMI unstable angina risk score

7 possible risk factors:
• Age >= 65 years
• Prior known CAD
• >= 3 coronary risk factors ( HTN, Hchol, FH, DM, current
  smoker)
• Aspirin use within 7 days
• ST segment deviation
• >= 2 episodes of angina within 24 hours
• Abnormal cardiac markers (MB or T)
                      Low risk = 0-2 risk factors
                 Intermediate risk = 4-3 risk factors       Antman EM et al:
                                                             JAMA
                      High risk = 5-7 risk factors          2000;284:835-42
PURSUIT SCORE(0–18)
Age, separate points for enrolment diagnosis
Decade [UA (MI)]

                         50                                             18 (11)
                         60                                             19 (12)
                         70                                             11 (13)
                         80                                             12 (14)
Sex
                         Male                                                 1
                        Female                                                0
Worst CCS-class in previous 6 weeks
                 No angina or CCS I/II                                        0
                        CCS III/IV                                            2
Signs of heart failure                                                        2
ST-depression on presenting ECG                                               1
                                          Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
GRACE(0–258)
  Age (years)        Heart rate (bpm)     Systolic BP (mmHg)
   <40        0        <70        0        <80                      63
  40–49      18      170–89       7       180–99                    58
  50–59      36      190–109      13      100–119                   47
  60–69      55      110–149      23      120–139                   37
  70–79      73      150–199      36      140–159                   26
   ≥80       91        >200       46      160–199                   11
                    Creatinine (mg/dL)     >200                      0
    Killip class     0.0- 0.39      2    Cardiac arrest at
Class I        0      0.4–0.79      5    admission                           43
Class II      21      0.8–1.19      8     Elevated cardiac
Class III     43      1.2–1.59     11         markers                        15
Class IV      64      1.6–1.99     14       ST-segment
                      0.2–3.99     23        deviation                       30
                        >4         31      Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk
scores: sustained prognostic value
       and interaction with
  revascularization in NSTE‐ACS
       Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves,
             Jorge Ferreira,
            Carlos Aguiar and
         Ricardo Seabra-Gomes


                           Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
Objective
• Compare the prognostic value
• Ability to predict benefit from myocardial
  revascularization performed during initial
  hospitalization




                               Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872 .
Study Endpoint
• Follow up
      1 year OR
      Until major event
• Endpoint
      All-cause mortality OR
        Non-fatal MI
• Analysis
       30 days
       1 year.

                                 Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
Interaction between the admission score and
     the prognostic impact of myocardial
  revascularization performed during initial
                hospital stay.




                               Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
Comparison of the predictive
        accuracy of the risk scores
        30 days                1 year
                   Δ      P-value     Δ                 P-value
 PURSUIT vs.
    TIMI          0.064   0.288    0.044                   0.319
  GRACE vs.
  PURSUIT         0.057   0.332    0.086                    0.04
GRACE vs. TIMI    0.121   0.054    0.130                   0.004


                                    Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
Conclusions
RSs developed from
   Databases of clinical trials (PURSUIT and TIMI) or
   Registries (GRACE)

• At 30 days the risk stratification by all 3 scores for
  patients with NSTE-ACS
       has fair to good discriminatory accuracy
      in predicting major adverse cardiac events
      at both 30 days and 1 year.

• The GRACE RS was the best for predicting the
  risk of death or MI at 1 year after admission.
                                            Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
The TIMI unstable angina risk score
7 possible risk factors:
• age >= 65 years
• >= coronary risk factors (like HTN, Hchol, FH, DM, current
   smoker)
• Aspirin use within 7 days
• ST segment deviation
• >= 2 episodes of angina within 24 hours
• Abnormal cardiac markers (MB or T)
             Low risk= 0-2 risk factors
             Intermediate risk= 3-4 risk factors
             High risk = 5-7 risk factors
                                                Antman EM et al. JAMA
                                                2000:284:835-42
Prognostic value of recurrent ischemia in
                  ACS




                  Armstrong PW et al. Circulation 1998:98:1860-1868
Troponin T and ST segment depression are
  independent predictors of adverse cardiac
             events at FU in ACS
                        Univariate OR( 95% Cl) Multivariate OR (95% Cl)

ST segment depression
1 mm                    1.56[1.02-2.40]         1.34[0.86-2.09]
2mm                     2.64 [1.57-4.44]        1.91 [1.10-3.32]

Troponin T
0.01-0.047 ng/ml        2.45 [1.25-4.82]        2.43 [1.22-4.85]
0.048-0.277 ng/mg       3.23[1.89-5.16]         3.18 [1.83-5.53]
0.278- 8.37 ng/ml       3.91 [2.32-6.61]        3.86 [2.24-6.66]



                                            Kaul et al.JACC 2002
TIMI Risk Score: 1oEP at 6 mos
                                                                  OR=0.55
                                       CONS          INV          CI (0.33, 0.91)
                          35                   OR=0.75              30.6
Death/MI/ACS Rehosp (%)




                          30                   CI (0.57, 1.00)

                          25
                                                  20.3                      19.5
                          20                               16.1
                          15    11.8    12.8
                          10
                          5
                          0
                                 Low     0-2   Intermed. 3-4       High      5-7
                                 TIMI Risk Score
          % of Pts:                25%                60%                  15%
TACTICS TIMI 18
                              Troponin T : Primary endpoint
                     Death / MI / rehospitalization for ACS at 6 months

                                                        OR = 0.53 p<0.001
                30      Conservative         Invasive   Interaction p<0.001
                                                          24.5
Incidence (%)




                25
                                   P=NS
                20                    16.9                               TnT cut point = 0.001
                            14.5                                 14.2    ng/ml (54 % of patients
                15
                                                                         were Troponin T
                10                                                       positive)

                 5

                 0
                           TnT negative                 TnT positive
TACTICS-TIMI 18: Invasive vs. Cons.
      Troponin T >0.01 ng/dl
     Primary Endpoint: Death/MI/Rehosp ACS


                                               TnT +, CONS
                                                                 24.2%

                          TnT -, INV
                                                                 14.8%
                                                TnT +, INV
                          TnT -, CONS




                         Morrow DA, et al. JAMA 2001;286:2405-2412.
Through 14 days in the un fractionated heparin (UFH) and
enoxaparin (ENOX) treatment groups in the pooled (TIMI) 11B
 and (ESSENCE) trial populations, with patients stratified by
                       TIMI risk score




                                              J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(4s1):S89-S95.
High TIMI score is associated with
   coronary thrombus in ACS
 Subanalysis of PRISM-PLUS (n=1491)




                                      D.A Morrow et al, AHA
                                      2001
Evaluation of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide for
Risk Assessment in Unstable Angina/Non-ST-
                  Elevation
    Myocardial Infarction
          B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and
              Prognosis in Tactics-TIMI 18

       David A. Morrow, MD, MPH, James A. de Lemos, MD,
          Marc S. Sabatine, MD, MPH, Sabina A. Murphy, MPH,
           Laura A. Demopoulos, MD, Peter M. Dibattiste, MD,
Carolyn H. McCabe, BS, C. Michael Gibson, MD, MS, Christopher P. Cannon,
                      MD, Eugene Braunwald, MD



                                      Morrow DA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1264-72.
Mortality Risk Stratified by B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels
        Over Range of 40 to 160 pg/ml: UA/NSTEMI
                               14
                               12
       6 Month Mortality (%)




                                                                                10.9             11.1

                               10
                               8                                 7.1

                               6
                                                      3.6
                               4
                                    1.7       1.9
                               2
                               0
  BNP (pg/ml)                                         >80-
                                    ≤ 40   >40- ≤80          >100- ≤120      >120- ≤160           >160
                                                      ≤100
  BNP Threshold                              >40      >80      >100              >120             >160
  % Positive                         -       38%      19%       14%              11%               7%
  OR                                 -       1.9      3.7        4.0              3.7              2.4
  X2                                 -       3.8      13.8      16.2             14.1              5.9
                                                               Morrow DA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1264-72.
Combination of cTnI, CRP, BNP in ACS
                                             OPUS-TIMI 16                                                              TACTICS-TIMI 18
                                 6                                                                        14
                                                                                                                 N=1635
30-Day Mortality Relative Risk




                                                                         30-Day Mortality Relative Risk
                                     N=450                                                                       Validation
                                 5                                                                        12
                                      P = 0.014                                                                  P < 0.0001
                                                                                                          10
                                 4
                                                                                                            8
                                 3
                                                                                                            6
                                 2
                                                                                                            4
                                 1
                                                                                                            2
                                 0                                                                          0
                                      0           1         2        3                                            0           1          2        3
                             N=      67    150        155       78                                         N = 504        717      324       90
          # of Elevated Cardiac Biomarkers                                                                # of Elevated Cardiac Biomarkers

                                                                                                                Sabatine MS et al. Circulation. 2002;105:1760-3.
Conclusions
• UA and NSTEMI Patients have varied anatomy
  and pathology
• Need to be stratified to determine urgency
  and modality of treatment either invasive or
  conservative
• Simple bed side score like TIMI score can
  stratify patients in low, intermediate and high
  risk patients
Multimarker Data
                                                    N= 3461
                           80
                                72.0
                           70
                           60
        Percent of Cases




                           50
                           40
                           30
                           20                  16.0
                           10                                      6.8                5.9
                            0
                                0               1                  2                  3
                                    Number or Markers Positive

Kontos MC, Garg R, Anderson FP, Roberts CS, Tatum JL, Ornato JP, Jesse RL. A multimarker strategy predicts short- and long-
term mortality n patients admitted for the exclusion of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45(3):217A.
Risk of Death or MI at 30 Days Stratified by BNP and
                 cTnI: UA/NSTEMI
      10            Death                 Death/MI

                    BNP >80                                                    7.9
      8             BNP <80
                                                     7.5
                                                                       6.4
      6                             5.4
                  4.5
  %




      4
                                                2
      2                       1.4
            0.7

      0
           cTnI NEG         cTnI POS        cTnI NEG                 cTnI POS
            P=0.004          P<0.001         P=0.008                   P=0.4
                                            Morrow DA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1264-72.
30-day and 1-year endpoint rates for
          PURSUIT score




                       Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
30-day and 1-year endpoint rates for
          the TIMI score.




                       Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
30-day and 1-year endpoint rates for
         the GRACE score.




                       Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
Through 30 days in the heparin alone and tirofiban
plus heparin treatment groups in (PRISM-PLUS), with
      patients stratified by (TIMI) trial risk score




                                      J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(4s1):S89-S95.
Through six months in the invasive (INV) and
conservative (CONS) treatment strategy arms
   in (TACTICS TIMI)-18 trial, with patients
         stratified by TIMI risk score




                                J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(4s1):S89-S95.
Acute Evaluation of ACS
   Presentation                                 Chest Pain or Short of Breath


                                                           ST-Segment          ST-Segment
       ECG                           Normal                Depression           Elevation


Blood Marker Panel                  –         +                –          +            +


    Diagnosis                                                Unstable
                                    Rule-Out                                   Acute MI
                                                             Angina
     Adapted from Braunwald E, et al. Available at:
     http://www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/1022188973899unstable_may8.pdf.
     Adapted from Antman EM, et al. Circulation.2004 Aug 31;110(9):e82-292.
Clinical Utilization of Cardiac Troponin
  and Natriuretic Peptides in ACS and CHF




Consultant Cardiologist and Chief, Division of Nutrition and Preventive
    Medicine Clinical Professor, Oakland University School of Allied
   Health Sciences, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan,
                                   USA
Troponin i levels predict the risk of mortality
   Changes in Focus on Heart Failure
                in ua/nstemi
                                                                                                                         7.5
                                          8
   Mortality at 42 Days (% of patients)




                                                                                                            6.0
                                          6


                                                                                              3.7

                                          4                                    3.4


                                                                  1.7
                                          2
                                                    1.0

                                                  831         174           148           134             50         67
                                          0
                                              0 to <0.4   0.4 to <1.0    1.0 to <2.0   2.0 to <5.0   5.0 to <9.0    >9.0

                                                                    Cardiac Troponin I (ng/ml)
 Risk Ratio      1.0          1.8                                           3.5            3.9           6.2       7.8
 Antman
 N Engl J Med. 335:1342, 1996
BNP Elevation in ACS

• Pre-existing or concurrent HF
• Large zone of myocardial ischemia
    – Left main disease
    – Multivessel disease
• Large zone of infarction
• Delayed presentation
• Renal dysfunction

                        McCullough, PA, ACC 2007
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the
Probability of Death Through 6 Months: UA/NSTEMI
                                                         BNP at baseline in 1,676 patients
                             10       BNP > 80 pg/ml     with non-ST-elevation ACS
                                      BNP ≤ 80 pg/ml
  Probability of Death (%)




                                                                          6 months 8.4%
                              5                                           vs. 1.8% p<0.001




                              0
                                  0   50        100         150                180
                                             Days since enrollment
                                                          Morrow DA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1264-72.
Probability of Death or Congestive Heart
             Failure Through 6 Months: UA/NSTEMI
                                  20            BNP > 80 pg/ml
                                                BNP ≤ 80 pg/ml
Probability of Death or CHF (%)




                                  15


                                  10                                                  6 months 16.3%
                                                                                      vs. 3.6%
                                                                                      p<0.0001

                                  5


                                  0
                                       0   30         60         90         120             150             180
                                                      Days since enrollment
                                                                      Morrow DA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1264-72.
Risk of CHF at 30 Days Stratified by BNP and
             cTnI: UA/NSTEMI
     12            CHF                   Death/CHF
                                                                           10.4
     10            BNP >80                          9
                   BNP <80
     8
                                   6.2
     6
 %




                 4.5
     4                                                              2.9

     2                       1.5
                                           0.8
           0.2
     0
          cTnI NEG       cTnI POS        cTnI NEG                 cTnI POS
          P<0.0001       P<0.0001        P<0.0001                 P<0.0001
                                         Morrow DA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1264-72.
TACTICS-TIMI 18 Study Design
                                                      PCI/ CABG
                          Early
                                         Angio
                          Invasive
                                                         Medical Rx
UA/          ASA, Hep,
NSTEMI       Tirofiban                                                         Endpoints

        Baseline          Early
                                            Medical Rx               ETT
        Troponin          Conservative
                                                       +ischemia
                                                        +ischemia
                                                      +ischemia

 Chest                                           Cath/ PCI/ CABG
 pain         Randomize
  -24           Hour                     4- 48                 108                    6 mos
                 0                        hrs                  hrs
  hrs
                                                  Cannon CP et al. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:731-6.
Primary Endpoint
                      Death, MI, Rehosp for ACS at 6 Months

             20                                                                           19.4%

             16                                                                           15.9%
% Patients




             12
                                                           O.R 0.78
              8                                            95% CI (0.62, 0.97)
                                                           p=0.025
              4
                                                                 CONS
              0                                                  INV
                  0     1       2          3        4              5              6
                                    Time (months)
                                                    Cannon CP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1879-87.
Troponin Substudy: 6 Month Results
                                                                  INV    CONS
1O Composite                                                      (%)    (%)
< 0.01                                                            16.9   14.5
0.01 – 0.1                                        P=0.01          10.1   23.0
> 0.1                                             P<0.001         15.7   24.6

Death/MI
< 0.01                                                            4.3    5.3
0.01 – 0.1                                         P=0.06         5.9    13.3
> 0.1                                                             9.0    12.0
  TnT
               0          0.5        1          1.5         2.0
                   Invasive Better       Conserv. Better
Subgroups: Primary Endpoint
                   Death, MI, Rehosp ACS at 6 Months
                                                              CONS   INV
1 Endpoint
 O
                       %Pts                                   (%)     (%)
Men                    (66%)                                  19.4   15.3
Women                  (34%)                                  19.6   17.0

Age < 65 yrs           (57%)                                  17.8   14.9
Age > 65 yrs           (43%)                                  21.7   17.1

Diabetes (28%)                                                27.7   20.1
No diabetes            (72%)                                  16.4   14.2

ST ∆ *                 (38%)                                  26.3   16.4
No ST ∆                (62%)                                  15.3   15.6
                                                              19.4   15.9
Total Population


*Interaction P=0.006           0   0.5        1        1.5
others P=NS                        INV Better   CONS Better
Benefit of INV in TnT+ Women
                                Death, MI, Rehosp for ACS
                      1.00
                                                            OR=0.56
                                        Invasive            Log rank p=0.03
                      0.90
Event Free Survival




                      0.80


                              Conservative
                      0.70

      Glaser et al
      ACC 2002 0                   50             !00         150             200
                                           Time (days)
ESC Guidelines for UA/NSTEMI
Clinical suspicion ACS
PE, ECG, Bloods


 No ST elevation            High-risk
                            ↑ Troponin                   GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor
                            Rec. Ischemia, DM
  Aspirin                                                Coronary Angio
                            Hemodyn. Instability
  Nitrates                  Early Post MI angina
  B-blockers
  Heparin                   Low-Risk                     Stress Test
                            Normal Troponin              Before or
  Clopidogrel                                            After
                            on admission                 Discharge
                            and 12 h later
                     Bertrand, presented ESC 2002,   Eur Heart J Sept 2000
UNSTABLE ANGINA
                 TIMI - 3B

CIRC. 1994, 89 : 1545-1556
1473 PATIENTS WITH REST ANGINA,
ECG CHANGES OR NON Q INF.
1473 PATIENTS RANDOMISED TO Tpa
OR PLACEBO
SECOND RANDOMISATION TO EARLY
CATH VS CONSERVATIVE CARE
NO DIFFERENCE IN DEATH OR MI
EARLIER DISCHARGE, FEWER ADMISSIONS
AND ↓ NEED FOR ANTIANGINAL DRUGS
IN INVASIVE STRATEGY
TIMI- IIIB
42 days (1 degree EP*) Invasive     Conservative             P value

N                       740         733
Death(%)                2.4         2.5                       NS
MI (%)                  5.1          5.7                     NS
D/MI/ +ETT (%) *        16.2        18.1                     NS

LOS(days)               10.2         10.9                    <0.001

Rehosp angina (%)       7.8          14.1                    <0.001
>= 2 anginal meds (%)   44          52                       0.02
D/MI/Rehosp (%)         15          22                       0.007
# days rehosp           365         930                      < 0.001

D/MI at 1 year (%)      10.8        12.2                     NS
                                            Anderson HV et al.JACC 1995;26:1643-50
The detrimental role of platelet derived
soluble CD40L * in cardiovascular disease
                          Inflammation
                          Induces production/ release of
                          pro inflammatory cytokines
                          from vascular and atheroma
                          cells


                         Thrombosis
                         Stabilizes platelet rich
                         thrombi


                         Restenosis
                         Prevents re-endothelialization
                         of the injured vessel
*sCD40L= Soluble CD40L   Contributes to activation and
                         proliferation of smooth muscle
                         cells
)
Death or nonfatal myocardial infarction
     during six months of follow up
According to base line level of soluble CD40 ligand in placebo
 group (544 patients) and the Abcximab group (544 patients
GP II b/IIIa in ACS: Intention to treat analysis
                      Death or MI at 30 days




 The PRISM-Plus investigators. Nejm 1998;   The PURSUIT Investigators. NEJM
 338:1488-87                                1998; 339:436-43
PRISM: Death/MI at 30 days
FRISC II: 1 year death or MI
One year outcomes TAXUS in ACS

                TAXUS(n= 237) Control   P value
                              (n=213)
Cardiac death   2.5           2.0       0.63
MI              3.8           6.2       0.27

CABG            1.7           6.1       0.05

PCI             5.2           13.0      0.0049
In-Hospital Death or Recurrent Myocardial
                     Infarction
          (GRACE + EUR. HEART SURVEY)
                    In-Hospital Death         Reinfarction
Type of Disease   GRACE       EHS-ACS   GRACE          EHS-ACS
                   (%)          (%)      (%)             (%)
STEMI               7            7        3                  2.7


NSTEMI              6           2.4       2                  1.4


UA                  3            -        -                   -


Undetermined        -           11.8      -                  1.7
ECG

                                         Eur. H.J. 2002, 23, 1179
                                         Eur. H.J. 2002, 23, 1190
Outcomes of Percutaneous Intervention in Five Trials
Characteristic           FRISC II      TACTICS        VINO       RITA – 3      ICTUS
                        (N = 2457)    (N = 2220)   (N = 1131)   (N = 1810)   (N = 1200)
                       (1222/1235)   (1114/1106)    (64 / 67)   (895/915)    (604/596)

Mean age (year)            65            62           66           63           62

Men (%)                    70            66           61           62           62

Diabetes (%)               12            28           25           13           14

Previous MI (%)            22            39           26           39           23

Mean follow up (mo)        24            6             6           24           12

Invasive / selective
revascularization

At end FU                78/43         61/44        73/39        57/28        79/54

PCI at FU                44/21         42/29        52/13        36/16        61/40

CABG at FU               38/23         22/16        35/30        22/12        18/14
TACTICS – TIMI - 18
Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of
Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy
                  New Engl. J. Med, June 2001, 344, 25 1879
ACS patients : Randomised
1114 Invasive Strategy
1106 Conservative Strategy
Similar demographic features
Standard treatment with ASP, Hep, BB &
Tirofiban 48 to 108 hours
Results of the ISAR-REACT 2 Trial, Comparing
           Abciximab with Placebo
                     Abciximab        Placebo
                            P = .02
20                               18.3

        P = .03
                        13.1
            11.9

10   8.9
                                                  P = .98
                                                4.6    4.6



0
      All Patients         High-risk             Low-risk
                          Troponin +            Troponin -
      (N = 2022)          (N = 1049)            (N = 1049)
ACS
              Incidence of Early (in-hospital)
             Revascularization in Several Trials
  80                                                        76
        71                         73
  70
                    60
  60
  50                                              44
                                          39                     40
  40                      36
%
  30
  20
             9                                         10
  10
   0
       FRISC-II   TACTICS           VINO         RITA-3     ICTUS

                         Early Invasive    Conservative
ACS
    Incidence of Mortality or Nonfatal MI at the end
              follow-up in several trials
                               Early Invasive     Conservative

  25                                            22.4

  20
                                                                  15
  15             14.1

 %        10.4
                               9.5                                      10
  10                     7.3                            7.6 8.3
                                         6.3
   5

   0
         FRISC-II       TACTICS           VINO          RITA-3    ICTUS
FU (months)   12           6               6              12       12
FRISC – II
                     CONCLUSIONS

After one year in 100 patients invasive strategy :
1) Saves 1.7 lives
2) Prevents 2 non fatal MI
3) Prevents 20 readmissions
4) Better symptoms relief
5) Lower cost
6) Preferred strategy for ischaemia with ECG
     changes and raised serum enzymes
Prognostic value of recurrent
      ischemia in ACS




             Armstrong PW et al. Circulation 1998:98:1860-1868
High TIMI score is associated with coronary
             thrombus in ACS
   Sub analysis of PRISM-PLUS (n=1491)




                             D.A Morrow et al, AHA 2001
Timing of Intervention in Patients with
   NSTEMI Acute Coronary Syndrome in
           the CRUSADE Registry

                            Timing of Catheterization
In-Hospital Events   46.3 Hours      23.4 Hours
                     (n = 10,804)   (n = 45,548)    P Value
Death (%)                 4.4            4.1          .23

Recurrent MI (%)         2.9            3.0             .36

Death / MI (%)           6.6            6.6             .86
Outcomes of the CRUSADE Trial :
In-Hospital Death or Myocardial Infarction

Outcome                    No Early Invasive     Early Invasive Management
                        ( Management (n = 9889            ( (n = 9889

Mortality (%)                    6.2                       2.0

Post-admission MI (%)            3.7                       3.1

Death or MI (%)                  8.9                       4.7
Troponin I Levels Predict the Risk
      of Mortality in ACS
                       0.08                                                               7.5%

                       0.07
                                                                              6.0%
Mortality at 42 Days




                       0.06

                       0.05

                       0.04                                       3.7%
                                                      3.4%
                       0.03

                       0.02               1.7%
                              1.0%
                       0.01       831
                                          174         148           134         50         67
                         0
                              0 - <0.4   0.4 - <1.0 1.0 - <2.0   2.0 - <5.0 5.0 - < 9.0   ≥ 9.0

                                            Cardiac Troponin I (ng/ml)

                                                                    Antman EM et al. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1342-9.
Minor Troponin Elevations and Mortality
• 34,227 patients admitted from ED
  over a 3 yr. period who had at
  least 1 TnI sampled (48% of all pts          10                                       9.4
  admitted)                                          In-hospital Mortality, %

• Pts classified based on degree
  of elevation                                 7.5
    – 0                    not detected
    – Negative            0–0.08 (99%)                                          5
                                                5
    – Indeterminant        0.09-0.2 (10% CV)
                                                                  3.3
    – Positive            > 0.21
• Significant increase in mortality            2.5    1.8
  with increasing TnI
• Results same if analyzed
                                                0
    – Patients with ACS
                                                       0          Neg     Indeterm      Pos
    – Patient who had serial sampling
                                                            Waxman DA. JACC. 2006;48:1755-62.
Cardiac Troponin
 Limitations
 Not an early marker

 Currently there is no standardization across
  Troponin I assays from different manufacturers

 Diagnostic accuracy at the low end is variable

 Sporadic elevations from non-atherothrombotic myocardial
  damage may confuse interpretation

 A low level troponin is not benign!
FRISC – II
   FRAGMIN AND FAST REVASCULARISATION DURING INSTABILITY
         IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE TRIAL (FRISC-II)
                    LANCET 2000 : 356:9-16

Object :
Compare Invasive And Non Invasive Strategy For
Coronary Intervention In Patients With Unstable
Coronary Artery Disease
 Design :
Prospective Randomised Multicentre Trial With
Parallel Groups (58 Scandinavian Centres)
FRISC – II
            Inclusion criteria

   Symptoms of ischaemia
   ECG changes > 0.1 mV DEP OR T WAVE
   Inversion Or
   CPKMB > 6 µ g/l
   Troponin T > 0.1 µ g/l
   More than 3000 patients randomised
   1 year data available in 1222 invasive
   And 1234 non invasive group
Multimarker Data and All-Cause Mortality
  N= 3461                 P < 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons
                 25                                                           25.0


                 20                                          20.0
     Mortality




                 15                        13.7
                                                                         12.7
                 10                                                                                   30 Day
                           6.6                           6.8                                          1-Year
                  5                     3.7
                      1.0
                  0
                         0                 1                2                3
                        Number or Markers Positive


      Kontos MC, Garg R, Anderson FP, Roberts CS, Tatum JL, Ornato JP, Jesse RL. A multimarker strategy predicts short- and long-term mort
      n patients admitted for the exclusion of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45(3):217A.
FRISC – II
                     CONCLUSIONS
After one year in 100 patients invasive strategy :
1) Saves 1.7 lives
2) Prevents 2 non fatal MI
3) Prevents 20 readmissions
4) Better symptoms relief
5) Lower cost
6) Preferred strategy for ischaemia with ECG
     changes and raised serum enzymes
TROPONIN T LEVELS
IN ACS & CARDIAC DEATH
      1506 Patients




                      FRISC – Circ. 1996, 93 : 1651
SABATINE AND ANTMAN
                 TIMI RISK SCORE FOR UA/NSTEMI




                                                               6-7

pulation   4.3        17.3   32.0        29.3         13.0           3.4
                                    Antman RM et al JAMA 2000, 284, 835
Annual Admissions for Acute
         Coronary Syndrome (ACS)
                           ~ 2.0 MM Patients Admitted
                          to CCU or Telemetry Annually




       600,000                                       1.4 Million
ST-Segment Elevation MI                            Non-ST-Segment
                                                    Elevation ACS

                                                Antman EM, et al. Circulation. 2004;110:588-636.
                                                Braunwald E, et al. Circulation. 2000;102:1193-1209.
Conclusion
In NSTE-ACS population,
• TIMI risk score can be widely applied
• At 30-day PURSUIT are better than others in
  the high-risk group
• GRACE is superior at long term follow-up in
  high risk group



                                   Heart 2012;98(S 2): E1–E319
UNSTABLE ANGINA                NSTEMI
• Ischemic discomfort       • Ischemic discomfort
• At rest or with minimal   • Rest or with minimal
  exertion                    exertion
• Occurs in a crescendo     • Occurs in a crescendo
  pattern or is severe        pattern or is severe
• New onset with or no      • New onset
  ECG changes
                            • With cardiac
                              biomarkers of necrosis
                                creatine kinase-MB
                                 iso enzyme [CK-MB]
                                cardiac troponin)
Chest Pain in the
                Emergency Department (ED)
                           100 million visits annually (US)
                             ~6 million chest pain visits

Discharged                                                    Admitted

2,000,000 Non                                                 4,000,000
Cardiac                                                       Suspected or Actual Cardiac

24,000                                                        1,360,000
Missed ACS                                                    Non Cardiac
(1.2%)                                                        (34%)
                                                              910,000
                                                              Non-Ischemic Cardiac (23%)

                                                              900,000
                                                              Unstable Angina (23%)

                                                              830,000
                                                              Myocardial Infarct (20%)

                  NCHS, Hospital Discharge Data, 2002
                               Pope et al, NEJM, 2000
Acute ischaemic coronary syndromes
              Global Practice Pattern (OASIS) (1)

Source : Organisation to Assess Strategies
                 For Ischaemic Syndromes Registry
        (OASIS)
8000 Patients
Acute Myocardial Infarction
No ST Elevation
Predischarge Coronary Angio :
    Performed in Brazil 70 %, USA 60 %, Hungary 20 %
                     Holland 7 %, Canada, Aust. Intermediate
     PTCA, CABG : More Widespread Differences Between Countries

                                             Circ. 1997, 96 (Suppl.) 1-40
Prognostic value of baseline Troponins in ACS
       GUSTO-IIA: 30 Day mortality




                         Ohman EM et al. NEJM 1996;335:1331-4
TIMI Risk Score
Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction
         Characteristics                   Points
            Historical
           Age ≥65 yrs                          1
     ≥3 Risk factors for CAD                    1
  Known CAD (stenosis ≥50%)                     1
    Aspirin use in past 7 days                  1
          Presentation
  Recent (≤24 h) severe angina                1
 ST-segment deviation ≥0.5 mm                 1
       ↑Cardiac markers                       1
    Risk Score = Total Points               (0–7)

                                 Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Ventricular tachycardia
Ventricular tachycardiaVentricular tachycardia
Ventricular tachycardiaPraveen Nagula
 
Echocardiography for Acute Coronary Syndrome
Echocardiography for Acute Coronary SyndromeEchocardiography for Acute Coronary Syndrome
Echocardiography for Acute Coronary SyndromePERKI Pekanbaru
 
Localization of WPW( accessory Pathway) by surface ECG
Localization of WPW( accessory Pathway) by surface ECGLocalization of WPW( accessory Pathway) by surface ECG
Localization of WPW( accessory Pathway) by surface ECGRaghu Kishore Galla
 
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME FOR CRITICAL CARE
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME FOR CRITICAL CAREACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME FOR CRITICAL CARE
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME FOR CRITICAL CAREAbhinovKandur
 
Approach to Wide complex tachycardia /cardiology
 Approach to Wide complex tachycardia /cardiology  Approach to Wide complex tachycardia /cardiology
Approach to Wide complex tachycardia /cardiology Cardiology
 
Refractory heart failure - Diagnosis, Management, Device Therapy
Refractory heart failure - Diagnosis, Management, Device TherapyRefractory heart failure - Diagnosis, Management, Device Therapy
Refractory heart failure - Diagnosis, Management, Device TherapyImran Ahmed
 
Esc 2020 guidelines for the management of acute coronary
Esc 2020 guidelines for the management of acute coronaryEsc 2020 guidelines for the management of acute coronary
Esc 2020 guidelines for the management of acute coronaryHimanshu Rana
 
INTERESTING ECGS -- PART II
INTERESTING ECGS -- PART IIINTERESTING ECGS -- PART II
INTERESTING ECGS -- PART IIPraveen Nagula
 
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyEchocardiographic Evaluation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyHatem Soliman Aboumarie
 
Acute coronary syndrome (acs)
Acute coronary syndrome (acs)Acute coronary syndrome (acs)
Acute coronary syndrome (acs)farranajwa
 
Chronic coronary syndromes
Chronic coronary syndromesChronic coronary syndromes
Chronic coronary syndromesYousra Ghzally
 
Management of VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA (VT)
Management of VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA (VT)Management of VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA (VT)
Management of VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA (VT)Malleswara rao Dangeti
 
ECG changes in myocardial Ischemia and injury
ECG changes in myocardial Ischemia and injuryECG changes in myocardial Ischemia and injury
ECG changes in myocardial Ischemia and injurySarah Sreekanth
 
STEMI equivalents- ECG update
STEMI equivalents- ECG updateSTEMI equivalents- ECG update
STEMI equivalents- ECG updateMagesh Vadivelu
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Ventricular tachycardia
Ventricular tachycardiaVentricular tachycardia
Ventricular tachycardia
 
Echocardiography for Acute Coronary Syndrome
Echocardiography for Acute Coronary SyndromeEchocardiography for Acute Coronary Syndrome
Echocardiography for Acute Coronary Syndrome
 
LBBB
LBBBLBBB
LBBB
 
Ischemia Trial
Ischemia TrialIschemia Trial
Ischemia Trial
 
Localization of WPW( accessory Pathway) by surface ECG
Localization of WPW( accessory Pathway) by surface ECGLocalization of WPW( accessory Pathway) by surface ECG
Localization of WPW( accessory Pathway) by surface ECG
 
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME FOR CRITICAL CARE
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME FOR CRITICAL CAREACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME FOR CRITICAL CARE
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME FOR CRITICAL CARE
 
Approach to Wide complex tachycardia /cardiology
 Approach to Wide complex tachycardia /cardiology  Approach to Wide complex tachycardia /cardiology
Approach to Wide complex tachycardia /cardiology
 
Ecg in acs
Ecg in acsEcg in acs
Ecg in acs
 
HF Review
HF ReviewHF Review
HF Review
 
Refractory heart failure - Diagnosis, Management, Device Therapy
Refractory heart failure - Diagnosis, Management, Device TherapyRefractory heart failure - Diagnosis, Management, Device Therapy
Refractory heart failure - Diagnosis, Management, Device Therapy
 
Esc 2020 guidelines for the management of acute coronary
Esc 2020 guidelines for the management of acute coronaryEsc 2020 guidelines for the management of acute coronary
Esc 2020 guidelines for the management of acute coronary
 
Stent Thrombosis
Stent ThrombosisStent Thrombosis
Stent Thrombosis
 
INTERESTING ECGS -- PART II
INTERESTING ECGS -- PART IIINTERESTING ECGS -- PART II
INTERESTING ECGS -- PART II
 
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyEchocardiographic Evaluation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
 
Acute coronary syndrome (acs)
Acute coronary syndrome (acs)Acute coronary syndrome (acs)
Acute coronary syndrome (acs)
 
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyHypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
 
Chronic coronary syndromes
Chronic coronary syndromesChronic coronary syndromes
Chronic coronary syndromes
 
Management of VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA (VT)
Management of VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA (VT)Management of VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA (VT)
Management of VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA (VT)
 
ECG changes in myocardial Ischemia and injury
ECG changes in myocardial Ischemia and injuryECG changes in myocardial Ischemia and injury
ECG changes in myocardial Ischemia and injury
 
STEMI equivalents- ECG update
STEMI equivalents- ECG updateSTEMI equivalents- ECG update
STEMI equivalents- ECG update
 

Ähnlich wie Risk stratification in UA and NSTEMI: Why and How?

Future of site stable to unstable
Future of site stable to unstableFuture of site stable to unstable
Future of site stable to unstableoptimacardio
 
Which Chest Pain Can Be Safely Discharged From Ed
Which Chest Pain Can Be Safely Discharged From EdWhich Chest Pain Can Be Safely Discharged From Ed
Which Chest Pain Can Be Safely Discharged From EdRashidi Ahmad
 
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary SyndromeAcute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary SyndromeAhmed Azhad
 
NSTEMI Invasive Treatment: Rationale and Timing
NSTEMI Invasive Treatment: Rationale and TimingNSTEMI Invasive Treatment: Rationale and Timing
NSTEMI Invasive Treatment: Rationale and Timingcardiositeindia
 
Nstemi invasive treatment rationale and timing
Nstemi invasive treatment rationale and timingNstemi invasive treatment rationale and timing
Nstemi invasive treatment rationale and timingoptimacardio
 
Escaping from Emergency department pitfalls
Escaping from Emergency department pitfallsEscaping from Emergency department pitfalls
Escaping from Emergency department pitfallstaem
 
Risk stratification of UA & NSTEMI
Risk stratification of UA & NSTEMIRisk stratification of UA & NSTEMI
Risk stratification of UA & NSTEMIMohammad Ebada
 
Management-of-CAD.ppt
Management-of-CAD.pptManagement-of-CAD.ppt
Management-of-CAD.pptAdelSALLAM4
 
076 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
076 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging076 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
076 cardiac magnetic resonance imagingSHAPE Society
 
Risk scores in nste acs
Risk scores in nste acsRisk scores in nste acs
Risk scores in nste acsVijay Yadav
 
Impact of contralateral carotid or vertebral artery occlusion in patients und...
Impact of contralateral carotid or vertebral artery occlusion in patients und...Impact of contralateral carotid or vertebral artery occlusion in patients und...
Impact of contralateral carotid or vertebral artery occlusion in patients und...uvcd
 
SCA non-ST+ de la personne âgée - D.U. MUPA 2018
SCA non-ST+ de la personne âgée - D.U. MUPA 2018SCA non-ST+ de la personne âgée - D.U. MUPA 2018
SCA non-ST+ de la personne âgée - D.U. MUPA 2018Nicolas Peschanski, MD, PhD
 

Ähnlich wie Risk stratification in UA and NSTEMI: Why and How? (20)

Strive Teleconf Presentation March22 2006
Strive Teleconf Presentation March22 2006Strive Teleconf Presentation March22 2006
Strive Teleconf Presentation March22 2006
 
Future of site stable to unstable
Future of site stable to unstableFuture of site stable to unstable
Future of site stable to unstable
 
Which Chest Pain Can Be Safely Discharged From Ed
Which Chest Pain Can Be Safely Discharged From EdWhich Chest Pain Can Be Safely Discharged From Ed
Which Chest Pain Can Be Safely Discharged From Ed
 
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary SyndromeAcute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndrome
 
Cardio Actualidad 2009 - Cardiopatía Isquémica
Cardio Actualidad 2009 - Cardiopatía IsquémicaCardio Actualidad 2009 - Cardiopatía Isquémica
Cardio Actualidad 2009 - Cardiopatía Isquémica
 
NSTEMI Invasive Treatment: Rationale and Timing
NSTEMI Invasive Treatment: Rationale and TimingNSTEMI Invasive Treatment: Rationale and Timing
NSTEMI Invasive Treatment: Rationale and Timing
 
Htn1
Htn1Htn1
Htn1
 
Nstemi invasive treatment rationale and timing
Nstemi invasive treatment rationale and timingNstemi invasive treatment rationale and timing
Nstemi invasive treatment rationale and timing
 
Escaping from Emergency department pitfalls
Escaping from Emergency department pitfallsEscaping from Emergency department pitfalls
Escaping from Emergency department pitfalls
 
PCI in elderly patients
PCI in elderly patientsPCI in elderly patients
PCI in elderly patients
 
Risk stratification of UA & NSTEMI
Risk stratification of UA & NSTEMIRisk stratification of UA & NSTEMI
Risk stratification of UA & NSTEMI
 
Management-of-CAD.ppt
Management-of-CAD.pptManagement-of-CAD.ppt
Management-of-CAD.ppt
 
Detecting acute coronary syndrome
Detecting acute coronary syndromeDetecting acute coronary syndrome
Detecting acute coronary syndrome
 
Kwong
KwongKwong
Kwong
 
076 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
076 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging076 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
076 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
 
076 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
076 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging076 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
076 cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
 
Risk scores in nste acs
Risk scores in nste acsRisk scores in nste acs
Risk scores in nste acs
 
Impact of contralateral carotid or vertebral artery occlusion in patients und...
Impact of contralateral carotid or vertebral artery occlusion in patients und...Impact of contralateral carotid or vertebral artery occlusion in patients und...
Impact of contralateral carotid or vertebral artery occlusion in patients und...
 
COMPASS PRESENTACION.pptx
COMPASS  PRESENTACION.pptxCOMPASS  PRESENTACION.pptx
COMPASS PRESENTACION.pptx
 
SCA non-ST+ de la personne âgée - D.U. MUPA 2018
SCA non-ST+ de la personne âgée - D.U. MUPA 2018SCA non-ST+ de la personne âgée - D.U. MUPA 2018
SCA non-ST+ de la personne âgée - D.U. MUPA 2018
 

Mehr von cardiositeindia

Statins for primary prevention in Indians
Statins for primary prevention in IndiansStatins for primary prevention in Indians
Statins for primary prevention in Indianscardiositeindia
 
How to choose drugs in pulmonary arterial hypertension
How to choose drugs in pulmonary arterial hypertensionHow to choose drugs in pulmonary arterial hypertension
How to choose drugs in pulmonary arterial hypertensioncardiositeindia
 
Home based oxygen therapy for severe pulmonary hypertension
Home based oxygen therapy for severe pulmonary hypertensionHome based oxygen therapy for severe pulmonary hypertension
Home based oxygen therapy for severe pulmonary hypertensioncardiositeindia
 
Choosing antiplatelet therapy before during and after hosp for acs
Choosing antiplatelet therapy before during and after hosp for acsChoosing antiplatelet therapy before during and after hosp for acs
Choosing antiplatelet therapy before during and after hosp for acscardiositeindia
 
Benefits of hypertension control
Benefits of hypertension controlBenefits of hypertension control
Benefits of hypertension controlcardiositeindia
 
Coronary CTA: The test of choice for obstructive CAD.
Coronary CTA: The test of choice for obstructive CAD.Coronary CTA: The test of choice for obstructive CAD.
Coronary CTA: The test of choice for obstructive CAD.cardiositeindia
 
Investigating stable IHD- Treadmill, Dobutamine stress echo or Stress thallium
Investigating stable IHD- Treadmill, Dobutamine stress echo or Stress thalliumInvestigating stable IHD- Treadmill, Dobutamine stress echo or Stress thallium
Investigating stable IHD- Treadmill, Dobutamine stress echo or Stress thalliumcardiositeindia
 
What to choose in stable CAD- Medical therapy only or PCI or CABG?
What to choose in stable CAD- Medical therapy only or PCI or CABG?What to choose in stable CAD- Medical therapy only or PCI or CABG?
What to choose in stable CAD- Medical therapy only or PCI or CABG?cardiositeindia
 
Coronary artery disease in indians: Glimpses from Indian data.
Coronary artery disease in indians: Glimpses from Indian data.Coronary artery disease in indians: Glimpses from Indian data.
Coronary artery disease in indians: Glimpses from Indian data.cardiositeindia
 
Beta blockers in SIHD: Yes, all patients should receive them !
Beta blockers in SIHD: Yes, all patients should receive them !Beta blockers in SIHD: Yes, all patients should receive them !
Beta blockers in SIHD: Yes, all patients should receive them !cardiositeindia
 
Stable ischemic heart disease how is it different from acs..
Stable ischemic heart disease how is it different from acs..Stable ischemic heart disease how is it different from acs..
Stable ischemic heart disease how is it different from acs..cardiositeindia
 
Mild heart failure (nyha i and ii) patients should not receive crt
Mild heart failure (nyha i and ii) patients should not receive crtMild heart failure (nyha i and ii) patients should not receive crt
Mild heart failure (nyha i and ii) patients should not receive crtcardiositeindia
 
All patients 40 days post mi should receive icd
All patients 40 days post mi should receive icdAll patients 40 days post mi should receive icd
All patients 40 days post mi should receive icdcardiositeindia
 
Acute rv failure physiology to management
Acute rv failure  physiology to managementAcute rv failure  physiology to management
Acute rv failure physiology to managementcardiositeindia
 
Hypertension guidelines ESH ESC 2013
Hypertension guidelines ESH ESC 2013Hypertension guidelines ESH ESC 2013
Hypertension guidelines ESH ESC 2013cardiositeindia
 
Hypertension management- Angina IHD
Hypertension management- Angina IHDHypertension management- Angina IHD
Hypertension management- Angina IHDcardiositeindia
 

Mehr von cardiositeindia (20)

Statins for primary prevention in Indians
Statins for primary prevention in IndiansStatins for primary prevention in Indians
Statins for primary prevention in Indians
 
How to choose drugs in pulmonary arterial hypertension
How to choose drugs in pulmonary arterial hypertensionHow to choose drugs in pulmonary arterial hypertension
How to choose drugs in pulmonary arterial hypertension
 
Home based oxygen therapy for severe pulmonary hypertension
Home based oxygen therapy for severe pulmonary hypertensionHome based oxygen therapy for severe pulmonary hypertension
Home based oxygen therapy for severe pulmonary hypertension
 
Choosing antiplatelet therapy before during and after hosp for acs
Choosing antiplatelet therapy before during and after hosp for acsChoosing antiplatelet therapy before during and after hosp for acs
Choosing antiplatelet therapy before during and after hosp for acs
 
Benefits of hypertension control
Benefits of hypertension controlBenefits of hypertension control
Benefits of hypertension control
 
Coronary CTA: The test of choice for obstructive CAD.
Coronary CTA: The test of choice for obstructive CAD.Coronary CTA: The test of choice for obstructive CAD.
Coronary CTA: The test of choice for obstructive CAD.
 
Investigating stable IHD- Treadmill, Dobutamine stress echo or Stress thallium
Investigating stable IHD- Treadmill, Dobutamine stress echo or Stress thalliumInvestigating stable IHD- Treadmill, Dobutamine stress echo or Stress thallium
Investigating stable IHD- Treadmill, Dobutamine stress echo or Stress thallium
 
What to choose in stable CAD- Medical therapy only or PCI or CABG?
What to choose in stable CAD- Medical therapy only or PCI or CABG?What to choose in stable CAD- Medical therapy only or PCI or CABG?
What to choose in stable CAD- Medical therapy only or PCI or CABG?
 
Coronary artery disease in indians: Glimpses from Indian data.
Coronary artery disease in indians: Glimpses from Indian data.Coronary artery disease in indians: Glimpses from Indian data.
Coronary artery disease in indians: Glimpses from Indian data.
 
Beta blockers in SIHD: Yes, all patients should receive them !
Beta blockers in SIHD: Yes, all patients should receive them !Beta blockers in SIHD: Yes, all patients should receive them !
Beta blockers in SIHD: Yes, all patients should receive them !
 
Beta blockers in sihd
Beta blockers in sihdBeta blockers in sihd
Beta blockers in sihd
 
Stable ischemic heart disease how is it different from acs..
Stable ischemic heart disease how is it different from acs..Stable ischemic heart disease how is it different from acs..
Stable ischemic heart disease how is it different from acs..
 
Mild heart failure (nyha i and ii) patients should not receive crt
Mild heart failure (nyha i and ii) patients should not receive crtMild heart failure (nyha i and ii) patients should not receive crt
Mild heart failure (nyha i and ii) patients should not receive crt
 
All patients 40 days post mi should receive icd
All patients 40 days post mi should receive icdAll patients 40 days post mi should receive icd
All patients 40 days post mi should receive icd
 
Sudden cardiac death
Sudden cardiac deathSudden cardiac death
Sudden cardiac death
 
Acute rv failure physiology to management
Acute rv failure  physiology to managementAcute rv failure  physiology to management
Acute rv failure physiology to management
 
Statin combinations
Statin combinationsStatin combinations
Statin combinations
 
Hypertension guidelines ESH ESC 2013
Hypertension guidelines ESH ESC 2013Hypertension guidelines ESH ESC 2013
Hypertension guidelines ESH ESC 2013
 
Anticoagulation in pci
Anticoagulation in pciAnticoagulation in pci
Anticoagulation in pci
 
Hypertension management- Angina IHD
Hypertension management- Angina IHDHypertension management- Angina IHD
Hypertension management- Angina IHD
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service BangaloreCall Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalorenarwatsonia7
 
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment BookingCall Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Bookingnarwatsonia7
 
VIP Call Girls Mumbai Arpita 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
VIP Call Girls Mumbai Arpita 9910780858 Independent Escort Service MumbaiVIP Call Girls Mumbai Arpita 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
VIP Call Girls Mumbai Arpita 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbaisonalikaur4
 
Low Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
Low Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service MumbaiLow Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
Low Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbaisonalikaur4
 
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort ServiceCollege Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort ServiceNehru place Escorts
 
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, PricingPharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, PricingArunagarwal328757
 
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service LucknowVIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknownarwatsonia7
 
Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...
Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...
Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...rajnisinghkjn
 
Noida Sector 135 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few C...
Noida Sector 135 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few C...Noida Sector 135 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few C...
Noida Sector 135 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few C...rajnisinghkjn
 
Call Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Surat
Call Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service SuratCall Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Surat
Call Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Suratnarwatsonia7
 
Call Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
Call Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service LucknowCall Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
Call Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknownarwatsonia7
 
Call Girls Service Noida Maya 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Noida
Call Girls Service Noida Maya 9711199012 Independent Escort Service NoidaCall Girls Service Noida Maya 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Noida
Call Girls Service Noida Maya 9711199012 Independent Escort Service NoidaPooja Gupta
 
Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...
Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...
Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...narwatsonia7
 
Call Girls Viman Nagar 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Viman Nagar 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any TimeCall Girls Viman Nagar 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Viman Nagar 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any Timevijaych2041
 
Call Girls Hosur Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hosur Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Hosur Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hosur Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Availablenarwatsonia7
 
call girls in munirka DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in munirka  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in munirka  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in munirka DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️saminamagar
 
Mumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
Mumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking ModelsMumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
Mumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking Modelssonalikaur4
 
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Availablenarwatsonia7
 
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAAjennyeacort
 
Call Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nagpur
Call Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service NagpurCall Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nagpur
Call Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service NagpurRiya Pathan
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service BangaloreCall Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
Call Girl Bangalore Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Bangalore
 
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment BookingCall Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
Call Girl Koramangala | 7001305949 At Low Cost Cash Payment Booking
 
VIP Call Girls Mumbai Arpita 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
VIP Call Girls Mumbai Arpita 9910780858 Independent Escort Service MumbaiVIP Call Girls Mumbai Arpita 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
VIP Call Girls Mumbai Arpita 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
 
Low Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
Low Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service MumbaiLow Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
Low Rate Call Girls Mumbai Suman 9910780858 Independent Escort Service Mumbai
 
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort ServiceCollege Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
College Call Girls Vyasarpadi Whatsapp 7001305949 Independent Escort Service
 
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, PricingPharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
Pharmaceutical Marketting: Unit-5, Pricing
 
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service LucknowVIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
VIP Call Girls Lucknow Nandini 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
 
Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...
Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...
Dwarka Sector 6 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few Cl...
 
Noida Sector 135 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few C...
Noida Sector 135 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few C...Noida Sector 135 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few C...
Noida Sector 135 Call Girls ( 9873940964 ) Book Hot And Sexy Girls In A Few C...
 
Call Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Surat
Call Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service SuratCall Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Surat
Call Girl Surat Madhuri 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Surat
 
Call Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
Call Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service LucknowCall Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
Call Girl Lucknow Mallika 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Lucknow
 
Call Girls Service Noida Maya 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Noida
Call Girls Service Noida Maya 9711199012 Independent Escort Service NoidaCall Girls Service Noida Maya 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Noida
Call Girls Service Noida Maya 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Noida
 
Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...
Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...
Russian Call Girls Chickpet - 7001305949 Booking and charges genuine rate for...
 
Call Girls Viman Nagar 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Viman Nagar 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any TimeCall Girls Viman Nagar 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Viman Nagar 7001305949 All Area Service COD available Any Time
 
Call Girls Hosur Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hosur Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Hosur Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Hosur Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
call girls in munirka DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in munirka  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in munirka  DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in munirka DELHI 🔝 >༒9540349809 🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
 
Mumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
Mumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking ModelsMumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
Mumbai Call Girls Service 9910780858 Real Russian Girls Looking Models
 
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Jp Nagar Just Call 7001305949 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
97111 47426 Call Girls In Delhi MUNIRKAA
 
Call Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nagpur
Call Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service NagpurCall Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nagpur
Call Girl Nagpur Sia 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nagpur
 

Risk stratification in UA and NSTEMI: Why and How?

  • 1. RISK STRATIFICATION IN UA AND NSTEMI :WHY AND HOW? -Dr.DEV PAHLAJANI MD,FACC,FSCAI HOD INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY BREACH CANDY HOSPITAL, CONS.CARDIOLOGIST B.NANAVATI HOPSITAL MUMBAI
  • 2. ACS is an Important Manifestation of Atherothrombosis1 Plaque rupture Stable UA Non- Q-wave Old term angina Q-wave MI MI New term Atherothrombosis UA/NSTEMI STEMI Days– Minutes– weeks hours Antithrombotic Thrombolysis therapy primary PCI UA=unstable angina; NSTEMI=non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI=percutaneous coronary intervention 1. Cannon CP. J Thromb Thrombolysis 1995; 2: 205–218.
  • 3. Our current understanding of unstable coronary syndromes is that they include a spectrum of disease and begin with a coronary plaque rupture1 The degree of thrombus occlusion determines the severity of the clinical syndrome, with total occlusion in ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) or severe (90%) stenosis in patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) or unstable angina (UA)1 In addition, it is worthwhile to note that 99% of all plaque ruptures are clinically silent. A small degree of rupture leads to a small thrombus, which heals over, leading to the progression of a plaque1 This current understanding of how atherosclerosis progresses emphasizes the key role that acute and chronic antithrombotic therapy plays in all patients with unstable coronary syndromes1 • Reference • 1. Cannon CP. J Thromb Thrombolysis 1995; 2: 205−218.
  • 4. Acute coronary syndromes: Prognostic spectrum  Unstable angina • New onset exertional angina • Progressive angina • Rest pain without EKG changes • Rest pain with EKG changes • Rest pain troponin+  Non ST elevation MI (NSTEMI)  Acute ST segment elevation MI Coronary occlusion & short term death Least Greatest
  • 5. Objectives of stratification  Can We Identify Patients At Low, Intermediate And High Risk Of Short Term And Long Term Macce?  Will It Help To Guide Treatment For Better Outcome?
  • 6. The TIMI unstable angina risk score 7 possible risk factors: • Age >= 65 years • Prior known CAD • >= 3 coronary risk factors ( HTN, Hchol, FH, DM, current smoker) • Aspirin use within 7 days • ST segment deviation • >= 2 episodes of angina within 24 hours • Abnormal cardiac markers (MB or T) Low risk = 0-2 risk factors Intermediate risk = 4-3 risk factors Antman EM et al: JAMA High risk = 5-7 risk factors 2000;284:835-42
  • 7. PURSUIT SCORE(0–18) Age, separate points for enrolment diagnosis Decade [UA (MI)] 50 18 (11)  60 19 (12)  70 11 (13)  80 12 (14) Sex  Male 1  Female 0 Worst CCS-class in previous 6 weeks  No angina or CCS I/II 0  CCS III/IV 2 Signs of heart failure 2 ST-depression on presenting ECG 1 Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
  • 8. GRACE(0–258) Age (years) Heart rate (bpm) Systolic BP (mmHg) <40 0 <70 0 <80 63  40–49 18  170–89 7  180–99 58  50–59 36  190–109 13  100–119 47  60–69 55  110–149 23  120–139 37  70–79 73  150–199 36  140–159 26  ≥80 91  >200 46  160–199 11 Creatinine (mg/dL)  >200 0 Killip class 0.0- 0.39 2 Cardiac arrest at Class I 0  0.4–0.79 5 admission 43 Class II 21  0.8–1.19 8 Elevated cardiac Class III 43  1.2–1.59 11 markers 15 Class IV 64  1.6–1.99 14 ST-segment  0.2–3.99 23 deviation 30  >4 31 Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
  • 9. TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE‐ACS Pedro de Araújo Gonçalves, Jorge Ferreira, Carlos Aguiar and Ricardo Seabra-Gomes Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
  • 10. Objective • Compare the prognostic value • Ability to predict benefit from myocardial revascularization performed during initial hospitalization Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872 .
  • 11. Study Endpoint • Follow up 1 year OR Until major event • Endpoint All-cause mortality OR  Non-fatal MI • Analysis  30 days  1 year. Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
  • 12. Interaction between the admission score and the prognostic impact of myocardial revascularization performed during initial hospital stay. Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
  • 13. Comparison of the predictive accuracy of the risk scores 30 days 1 year Δ P-value Δ P-value PURSUIT vs. TIMI 0.064 0.288 0.044 0.319 GRACE vs. PURSUIT 0.057 0.332 0.086 0.04 GRACE vs. TIMI 0.121 0.054 0.130 0.004 Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
  • 14. Conclusions RSs developed from Databases of clinical trials (PURSUIT and TIMI) or Registries (GRACE) • At 30 days the risk stratification by all 3 scores for patients with NSTE-ACS  has fair to good discriminatory accuracy in predicting major adverse cardiac events at both 30 days and 1 year. • The GRACE RS was the best for predicting the risk of death or MI at 1 year after admission. Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
  • 15. The TIMI unstable angina risk score 7 possible risk factors: • age >= 65 years • >= coronary risk factors (like HTN, Hchol, FH, DM, current smoker) • Aspirin use within 7 days • ST segment deviation • >= 2 episodes of angina within 24 hours • Abnormal cardiac markers (MB or T) Low risk= 0-2 risk factors Intermediate risk= 3-4 risk factors High risk = 5-7 risk factors Antman EM et al. JAMA 2000:284:835-42
  • 16. Prognostic value of recurrent ischemia in ACS Armstrong PW et al. Circulation 1998:98:1860-1868
  • 17. Troponin T and ST segment depression are independent predictors of adverse cardiac events at FU in ACS Univariate OR( 95% Cl) Multivariate OR (95% Cl) ST segment depression 1 mm 1.56[1.02-2.40] 1.34[0.86-2.09] 2mm 2.64 [1.57-4.44] 1.91 [1.10-3.32] Troponin T 0.01-0.047 ng/ml 2.45 [1.25-4.82] 2.43 [1.22-4.85] 0.048-0.277 ng/mg 3.23[1.89-5.16] 3.18 [1.83-5.53] 0.278- 8.37 ng/ml 3.91 [2.32-6.61] 3.86 [2.24-6.66] Kaul et al.JACC 2002
  • 18. TIMI Risk Score: 1oEP at 6 mos OR=0.55 CONS INV CI (0.33, 0.91) 35 OR=0.75 30.6 Death/MI/ACS Rehosp (%) 30 CI (0.57, 1.00) 25 20.3 19.5 20 16.1 15 11.8 12.8 10 5 0 Low 0-2 Intermed. 3-4 High 5-7 TIMI Risk Score % of Pts: 25% 60% 15%
  • 19. TACTICS TIMI 18 Troponin T : Primary endpoint Death / MI / rehospitalization for ACS at 6 months OR = 0.53 p<0.001 30 Conservative Invasive Interaction p<0.001 24.5 Incidence (%) 25 P=NS 20 16.9 TnT cut point = 0.001 14.5 14.2 ng/ml (54 % of patients 15 were Troponin T 10 positive) 5 0 TnT negative TnT positive
  • 20. TACTICS-TIMI 18: Invasive vs. Cons. Troponin T >0.01 ng/dl Primary Endpoint: Death/MI/Rehosp ACS TnT +, CONS 24.2% TnT -, INV 14.8% TnT +, INV TnT -, CONS Morrow DA, et al. JAMA 2001;286:2405-2412.
  • 21. Through 14 days in the un fractionated heparin (UFH) and enoxaparin (ENOX) treatment groups in the pooled (TIMI) 11B and (ESSENCE) trial populations, with patients stratified by TIMI risk score J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(4s1):S89-S95.
  • 22. High TIMI score is associated with coronary thrombus in ACS Subanalysis of PRISM-PLUS (n=1491) D.A Morrow et al, AHA 2001
  • 23. Evaluation of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide for Risk Assessment in Unstable Angina/Non-ST- Elevation Myocardial Infarction B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Prognosis in Tactics-TIMI 18 David A. Morrow, MD, MPH, James A. de Lemos, MD, Marc S. Sabatine, MD, MPH, Sabina A. Murphy, MPH, Laura A. Demopoulos, MD, Peter M. Dibattiste, MD, Carolyn H. McCabe, BS, C. Michael Gibson, MD, MS, Christopher P. Cannon, MD, Eugene Braunwald, MD Morrow DA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1264-72.
  • 24. Mortality Risk Stratified by B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels Over Range of 40 to 160 pg/ml: UA/NSTEMI 14 12 6 Month Mortality (%) 10.9 11.1 10 8 7.1 6 3.6 4 1.7 1.9 2 0 BNP (pg/ml) >80- ≤ 40 >40- ≤80 >100- ≤120 >120- ≤160 >160 ≤100 BNP Threshold >40 >80 >100 >120 >160 % Positive - 38% 19% 14% 11% 7% OR - 1.9 3.7 4.0 3.7 2.4 X2 - 3.8 13.8 16.2 14.1 5.9 Morrow DA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1264-72.
  • 25. Combination of cTnI, CRP, BNP in ACS OPUS-TIMI 16 TACTICS-TIMI 18 6 14 N=1635 30-Day Mortality Relative Risk 30-Day Mortality Relative Risk N=450 Validation 5 12 P = 0.014 P < 0.0001 10 4 8 3 6 2 4 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 N= 67 150 155 78 N = 504 717 324 90 # of Elevated Cardiac Biomarkers # of Elevated Cardiac Biomarkers Sabatine MS et al. Circulation. 2002;105:1760-3.
  • 26. Conclusions • UA and NSTEMI Patients have varied anatomy and pathology • Need to be stratified to determine urgency and modality of treatment either invasive or conservative • Simple bed side score like TIMI score can stratify patients in low, intermediate and high risk patients
  • 27. Multimarker Data N= 3461 80 72.0 70 60 Percent of Cases 50 40 30 20 16.0 10 6.8 5.9 0 0 1 2 3 Number or Markers Positive Kontos MC, Garg R, Anderson FP, Roberts CS, Tatum JL, Ornato JP, Jesse RL. A multimarker strategy predicts short- and long- term mortality n patients admitted for the exclusion of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45(3):217A.
  • 28. Risk of Death or MI at 30 Days Stratified by BNP and cTnI: UA/NSTEMI 10 Death Death/MI BNP >80 7.9 8 BNP <80 7.5 6.4 6 5.4 4.5 % 4 2 2 1.4 0.7 0 cTnI NEG cTnI POS cTnI NEG cTnI POS P=0.004 P<0.001 P=0.008 P=0.4 Morrow DA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1264-72.
  • 29. 30-day and 1-year endpoint rates for PURSUIT score Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
  • 30. 30-day and 1-year endpoint rates for the TIMI score. Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
  • 31. 30-day and 1-year endpoint rates for the GRACE score. Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.
  • 32. Through 30 days in the heparin alone and tirofiban plus heparin treatment groups in (PRISM-PLUS), with patients stratified by (TIMI) trial risk score J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(4s1):S89-S95.
  • 33. Through six months in the invasive (INV) and conservative (CONS) treatment strategy arms in (TACTICS TIMI)-18 trial, with patients stratified by TIMI risk score J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(4s1):S89-S95.
  • 34. Acute Evaluation of ACS Presentation Chest Pain or Short of Breath ST-Segment ST-Segment ECG Normal Depression Elevation Blood Marker Panel – + – + + Diagnosis Unstable Rule-Out Acute MI Angina Adapted from Braunwald E, et al. Available at: http://www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/1022188973899unstable_may8.pdf. Adapted from Antman EM, et al. Circulation.2004 Aug 31;110(9):e82-292.
  • 35. Clinical Utilization of Cardiac Troponin and Natriuretic Peptides in ACS and CHF Consultant Cardiologist and Chief, Division of Nutrition and Preventive Medicine Clinical Professor, Oakland University School of Allied Health Sciences, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
  • 36. Troponin i levels predict the risk of mortality Changes in Focus on Heart Failure in ua/nstemi 7.5 8 Mortality at 42 Days (% of patients) 6.0 6 3.7 4 3.4 1.7 2 1.0 831 174 148 134 50 67 0 0 to <0.4 0.4 to <1.0 1.0 to <2.0 2.0 to <5.0 5.0 to <9.0 >9.0 Cardiac Troponin I (ng/ml) Risk Ratio 1.0 1.8 3.5 3.9 6.2 7.8 Antman N Engl J Med. 335:1342, 1996
  • 37. BNP Elevation in ACS • Pre-existing or concurrent HF • Large zone of myocardial ischemia – Left main disease – Multivessel disease • Large zone of infarction • Delayed presentation • Renal dysfunction McCullough, PA, ACC 2007
  • 38. Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Death Through 6 Months: UA/NSTEMI BNP at baseline in 1,676 patients 10 BNP > 80 pg/ml with non-ST-elevation ACS BNP ≤ 80 pg/ml Probability of Death (%) 6 months 8.4% 5 vs. 1.8% p<0.001 0 0 50 100 150 180 Days since enrollment Morrow DA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1264-72.
  • 39. Probability of Death or Congestive Heart Failure Through 6 Months: UA/NSTEMI 20 BNP > 80 pg/ml BNP ≤ 80 pg/ml Probability of Death or CHF (%) 15 10 6 months 16.3% vs. 3.6% p<0.0001 5 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Days since enrollment Morrow DA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1264-72.
  • 40. Risk of CHF at 30 Days Stratified by BNP and cTnI: UA/NSTEMI 12 CHF Death/CHF 10.4 10 BNP >80 9 BNP <80 8 6.2 6 % 4.5 4 2.9 2 1.5 0.8 0.2 0 cTnI NEG cTnI POS cTnI NEG cTnI POS P<0.0001 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 P<0.0001 Morrow DA et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1264-72.
  • 41. TACTICS-TIMI 18 Study Design PCI/ CABG Early Angio Invasive Medical Rx UA/ ASA, Hep, NSTEMI Tirofiban Endpoints Baseline Early Medical Rx ETT Troponin Conservative +ischemia +ischemia +ischemia Chest Cath/ PCI/ CABG pain Randomize -24 Hour 4- 48 108 6 mos 0 hrs hrs hrs Cannon CP et al. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:731-6.
  • 42. Primary Endpoint Death, MI, Rehosp for ACS at 6 Months 20 19.4% 16 15.9% % Patients 12 O.R 0.78 8 95% CI (0.62, 0.97) p=0.025 4 CONS 0 INV 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Time (months) Cannon CP, et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1879-87.
  • 43. Troponin Substudy: 6 Month Results INV CONS 1O Composite (%) (%) < 0.01 16.9 14.5 0.01 – 0.1 P=0.01 10.1 23.0 > 0.1 P<0.001 15.7 24.6 Death/MI < 0.01 4.3 5.3 0.01 – 0.1 P=0.06 5.9 13.3 > 0.1 9.0 12.0 TnT 0 0.5 1 1.5 2.0 Invasive Better Conserv. Better
  • 44. Subgroups: Primary Endpoint Death, MI, Rehosp ACS at 6 Months CONS INV 1 Endpoint O %Pts (%) (%) Men (66%) 19.4 15.3 Women (34%) 19.6 17.0 Age < 65 yrs (57%) 17.8 14.9 Age > 65 yrs (43%) 21.7 17.1 Diabetes (28%) 27.7 20.1 No diabetes (72%) 16.4 14.2 ST ∆ * (38%) 26.3 16.4 No ST ∆ (62%) 15.3 15.6 19.4 15.9 Total Population *Interaction P=0.006 0 0.5 1 1.5 others P=NS INV Better CONS Better
  • 45. Benefit of INV in TnT+ Women Death, MI, Rehosp for ACS 1.00 OR=0.56 Invasive Log rank p=0.03 0.90 Event Free Survival 0.80 Conservative 0.70 Glaser et al ACC 2002 0 50 !00 150 200 Time (days)
  • 46. ESC Guidelines for UA/NSTEMI Clinical suspicion ACS PE, ECG, Bloods No ST elevation High-risk ↑ Troponin GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor Rec. Ischemia, DM Aspirin Coronary Angio Hemodyn. Instability Nitrates Early Post MI angina B-blockers Heparin Low-Risk Stress Test Normal Troponin Before or Clopidogrel After on admission Discharge and 12 h later Bertrand, presented ESC 2002, Eur Heart J Sept 2000
  • 47. UNSTABLE ANGINA TIMI - 3B CIRC. 1994, 89 : 1545-1556 1473 PATIENTS WITH REST ANGINA, ECG CHANGES OR NON Q INF. 1473 PATIENTS RANDOMISED TO Tpa OR PLACEBO SECOND RANDOMISATION TO EARLY CATH VS CONSERVATIVE CARE NO DIFFERENCE IN DEATH OR MI EARLIER DISCHARGE, FEWER ADMISSIONS AND ↓ NEED FOR ANTIANGINAL DRUGS IN INVASIVE STRATEGY
  • 48. TIMI- IIIB 42 days (1 degree EP*) Invasive Conservative P value N 740 733 Death(%) 2.4 2.5 NS MI (%) 5.1 5.7 NS D/MI/ +ETT (%) * 16.2 18.1 NS LOS(days) 10.2 10.9 <0.001 Rehosp angina (%) 7.8 14.1 <0.001 >= 2 anginal meds (%) 44 52 0.02 D/MI/Rehosp (%) 15 22 0.007 # days rehosp 365 930 < 0.001 D/MI at 1 year (%) 10.8 12.2 NS Anderson HV et al.JACC 1995;26:1643-50
  • 49. The detrimental role of platelet derived soluble CD40L * in cardiovascular disease Inflammation Induces production/ release of pro inflammatory cytokines from vascular and atheroma cells Thrombosis Stabilizes platelet rich thrombi Restenosis Prevents re-endothelialization of the injured vessel *sCD40L= Soluble CD40L Contributes to activation and proliferation of smooth muscle cells
  • 50. ) Death or nonfatal myocardial infarction during six months of follow up According to base line level of soluble CD40 ligand in placebo group (544 patients) and the Abcximab group (544 patients
  • 51. GP II b/IIIa in ACS: Intention to treat analysis Death or MI at 30 days The PRISM-Plus investigators. Nejm 1998; The PURSUIT Investigators. NEJM 338:1488-87 1998; 339:436-43
  • 53. FRISC II: 1 year death or MI
  • 54. One year outcomes TAXUS in ACS TAXUS(n= 237) Control P value (n=213) Cardiac death 2.5 2.0 0.63 MI 3.8 6.2 0.27 CABG 1.7 6.1 0.05 PCI 5.2 13.0 0.0049
  • 55. In-Hospital Death or Recurrent Myocardial Infarction (GRACE + EUR. HEART SURVEY) In-Hospital Death Reinfarction Type of Disease GRACE EHS-ACS GRACE EHS-ACS (%) (%) (%) (%) STEMI 7 7 3 2.7 NSTEMI 6 2.4 2 1.4 UA 3 - - - Undetermined - 11.8 - 1.7 ECG Eur. H.J. 2002, 23, 1179 Eur. H.J. 2002, 23, 1190
  • 56. Outcomes of Percutaneous Intervention in Five Trials Characteristic FRISC II TACTICS VINO RITA – 3 ICTUS (N = 2457) (N = 2220) (N = 1131) (N = 1810) (N = 1200) (1222/1235) (1114/1106) (64 / 67) (895/915) (604/596) Mean age (year) 65 62 66 63 62 Men (%) 70 66 61 62 62 Diabetes (%) 12 28 25 13 14 Previous MI (%) 22 39 26 39 23 Mean follow up (mo) 24 6 6 24 12 Invasive / selective revascularization At end FU 78/43 61/44 73/39 57/28 79/54 PCI at FU 44/21 42/29 52/13 36/16 61/40 CABG at FU 38/23 22/16 35/30 22/12 18/14
  • 57. TACTICS – TIMI - 18 Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy New Engl. J. Med, June 2001, 344, 25 1879 ACS patients : Randomised 1114 Invasive Strategy 1106 Conservative Strategy Similar demographic features Standard treatment with ASP, Hep, BB & Tirofiban 48 to 108 hours
  • 58. Results of the ISAR-REACT 2 Trial, Comparing Abciximab with Placebo Abciximab Placebo P = .02 20 18.3 P = .03 13.1 11.9 10 8.9 P = .98 4.6 4.6 0 All Patients High-risk Low-risk Troponin + Troponin - (N = 2022) (N = 1049) (N = 1049)
  • 59. ACS Incidence of Early (in-hospital) Revascularization in Several Trials 80 76 71 73 70 60 60 50 44 39 40 40 36 % 30 20 9 10 10 0 FRISC-II TACTICS VINO RITA-3 ICTUS Early Invasive Conservative
  • 60. ACS Incidence of Mortality or Nonfatal MI at the end follow-up in several trials Early Invasive Conservative 25 22.4 20 15 15 14.1 % 10.4 9.5 10 10 7.3 7.6 8.3 6.3 5 0 FRISC-II TACTICS VINO RITA-3 ICTUS FU (months) 12 6 6 12 12
  • 61. FRISC – II CONCLUSIONS After one year in 100 patients invasive strategy : 1) Saves 1.7 lives 2) Prevents 2 non fatal MI 3) Prevents 20 readmissions 4) Better symptoms relief 5) Lower cost 6) Preferred strategy for ischaemia with ECG changes and raised serum enzymes
  • 62. Prognostic value of recurrent ischemia in ACS Armstrong PW et al. Circulation 1998:98:1860-1868
  • 63. High TIMI score is associated with coronary thrombus in ACS Sub analysis of PRISM-PLUS (n=1491) D.A Morrow et al, AHA 2001
  • 64. Timing of Intervention in Patients with NSTEMI Acute Coronary Syndrome in the CRUSADE Registry Timing of Catheterization In-Hospital Events 46.3 Hours 23.4 Hours (n = 10,804) (n = 45,548) P Value Death (%) 4.4 4.1 .23 Recurrent MI (%) 2.9 3.0 .36 Death / MI (%) 6.6 6.6 .86
  • 65. Outcomes of the CRUSADE Trial : In-Hospital Death or Myocardial Infarction Outcome No Early Invasive Early Invasive Management ( Management (n = 9889 ( (n = 9889 Mortality (%) 6.2 2.0 Post-admission MI (%) 3.7 3.1 Death or MI (%) 8.9 4.7
  • 66. Troponin I Levels Predict the Risk of Mortality in ACS 0.08 7.5% 0.07 6.0% Mortality at 42 Days 0.06 0.05 0.04 3.7% 3.4% 0.03 0.02 1.7% 1.0% 0.01 831 174 148 134 50 67 0 0 - <0.4 0.4 - <1.0 1.0 - <2.0 2.0 - <5.0 5.0 - < 9.0 ≥ 9.0 Cardiac Troponin I (ng/ml) Antman EM et al. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1342-9.
  • 67. Minor Troponin Elevations and Mortality • 34,227 patients admitted from ED over a 3 yr. period who had at least 1 TnI sampled (48% of all pts 10 9.4 admitted) In-hospital Mortality, % • Pts classified based on degree of elevation 7.5 – 0 not detected – Negative 0–0.08 (99%) 5 5 – Indeterminant 0.09-0.2 (10% CV) 3.3 – Positive > 0.21 • Significant increase in mortality 2.5 1.8 with increasing TnI • Results same if analyzed 0 – Patients with ACS 0 Neg Indeterm Pos – Patient who had serial sampling Waxman DA. JACC. 2006;48:1755-62.
  • 68. Cardiac Troponin Limitations  Not an early marker  Currently there is no standardization across Troponin I assays from different manufacturers  Diagnostic accuracy at the low end is variable  Sporadic elevations from non-atherothrombotic myocardial damage may confuse interpretation  A low level troponin is not benign!
  • 69. FRISC – II FRAGMIN AND FAST REVASCULARISATION DURING INSTABILITY IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE TRIAL (FRISC-II) LANCET 2000 : 356:9-16 Object : Compare Invasive And Non Invasive Strategy For Coronary Intervention In Patients With Unstable Coronary Artery Disease  Design : Prospective Randomised Multicentre Trial With Parallel Groups (58 Scandinavian Centres)
  • 70. FRISC – II Inclusion criteria  Symptoms of ischaemia  ECG changes > 0.1 mV DEP OR T WAVE  Inversion Or  CPKMB > 6 µ g/l  Troponin T > 0.1 µ g/l  More than 3000 patients randomised  1 year data available in 1222 invasive  And 1234 non invasive group
  • 71. Multimarker Data and All-Cause Mortality N= 3461 P < 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons 25 25.0 20 20.0 Mortality 15 13.7 12.7 10 30 Day 6.6 6.8 1-Year 5 3.7 1.0 0 0 1 2 3 Number or Markers Positive Kontos MC, Garg R, Anderson FP, Roberts CS, Tatum JL, Ornato JP, Jesse RL. A multimarker strategy predicts short- and long-term mort n patients admitted for the exclusion of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45(3):217A.
  • 72. FRISC – II CONCLUSIONS After one year in 100 patients invasive strategy : 1) Saves 1.7 lives 2) Prevents 2 non fatal MI 3) Prevents 20 readmissions 4) Better symptoms relief 5) Lower cost 6) Preferred strategy for ischaemia with ECG changes and raised serum enzymes
  • 73. TROPONIN T LEVELS IN ACS & CARDIAC DEATH 1506 Patients FRISC – Circ. 1996, 93 : 1651
  • 74. SABATINE AND ANTMAN TIMI RISK SCORE FOR UA/NSTEMI 6-7 pulation 4.3 17.3 32.0 29.3 13.0 3.4 Antman RM et al JAMA 2000, 284, 835
  • 75. Annual Admissions for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) ~ 2.0 MM Patients Admitted to CCU or Telemetry Annually 600,000 1.4 Million ST-Segment Elevation MI Non-ST-Segment Elevation ACS Antman EM, et al. Circulation. 2004;110:588-636. Braunwald E, et al. Circulation. 2000;102:1193-1209.
  • 76. Conclusion In NSTE-ACS population, • TIMI risk score can be widely applied • At 30-day PURSUIT are better than others in the high-risk group • GRACE is superior at long term follow-up in high risk group Heart 2012;98(S 2): E1–E319
  • 77. UNSTABLE ANGINA NSTEMI • Ischemic discomfort • Ischemic discomfort • At rest or with minimal • Rest or with minimal exertion exertion • Occurs in a crescendo • Occurs in a crescendo pattern or is severe pattern or is severe • New onset with or no • New onset ECG changes • With cardiac biomarkers of necrosis  creatine kinase-MB iso enzyme [CK-MB]  cardiac troponin)
  • 78. Chest Pain in the Emergency Department (ED) 100 million visits annually (US) ~6 million chest pain visits Discharged Admitted 2,000,000 Non 4,000,000 Cardiac Suspected or Actual Cardiac 24,000 1,360,000 Missed ACS Non Cardiac (1.2%) (34%) 910,000 Non-Ischemic Cardiac (23%) 900,000 Unstable Angina (23%) 830,000 Myocardial Infarct (20%) NCHS, Hospital Discharge Data, 2002 Pope et al, NEJM, 2000
  • 79. Acute ischaemic coronary syndromes Global Practice Pattern (OASIS) (1) Source : Organisation to Assess Strategies For Ischaemic Syndromes Registry (OASIS) 8000 Patients Acute Myocardial Infarction No ST Elevation Predischarge Coronary Angio : Performed in Brazil 70 %, USA 60 %, Hungary 20 % Holland 7 %, Canada, Aust. Intermediate PTCA, CABG : More Widespread Differences Between Countries Circ. 1997, 96 (Suppl.) 1-40
  • 80. Prognostic value of baseline Troponins in ACS GUSTO-IIA: 30 Day mortality Ohman EM et al. NEJM 1996;335:1331-4
  • 81. TIMI Risk Score Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Characteristics Points Historical Age ≥65 yrs 1 ≥3 Risk factors for CAD 1 Known CAD (stenosis ≥50%) 1 Aspirin use in past 7 days 1 Presentation Recent (≤24 h) severe angina 1 ST-segment deviation ≥0.5 mm 1 ↑Cardiac markers 1 Risk Score = Total Points (0–7) Eur Heart J (May 2005) 26 (9):865-872.

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Our current understanding of unstable coronary syndromes is that they include a spectrum of disease and begin with a coronary plaque rupture 1 The degree of thrombus occlusion determines the severity of the clinical syndrome, with total occlusion in ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) or severe (90%) stenosis in patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) or unstable angina (UA) 1 In addition, it is worthwhile to note that 99% of all plaque ruptures are clinically silent. A small degree of rupture leads to a small thrombus, which heals over, leading to the progression of a plaque 1 This current understanding of how atherosclerosis progresses emphasizes the key role that acute and chronic antithrombotic therapy plays in all patients with unstable coronary syndromes 1 Reference 1. Cannon CP. J Thromb Thrombolysis 1995; 2: 205  218.
  2. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non–Q-wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE)
  3. Platelet Receptor inhibition for Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited to very Unstable Signs and Symptoms (PRISM-PLUS
  4. Treat angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction
  5. This slide represents a diagnostic paradigm for patients presenting with ACS. Patients complaining of chest pain are first evaluated for the presence of ECG changes in the emergency department to determine if the pain is caused by coronary disease. The final diagnosis of a specific ACS incorporates both the ECG findings and results of assays for cardiac markers, such as CK-MB and troponins. By evaluating ECG results and identifying cardiac markers, a patient’s overall risk may be assessed and the level of aggressiveness for therapy can be determined. Patients with persistent ST-segment elevation demonstrated on an ECG are diagnosed as having STEMI, regardless of whether their cardiac markers are elevated. In the larger group of patients who have ischemic ECG changes other than persistent ST-segment elevation (eg, ST-segment depression, transient ST-segment elevation, T-wave inversions), measurement of cardiac markers is essential for distinguishing those who have UA (no elevation of cardiac markers) and those with NSTEMI (elevated cardiac markers).
  6. The baseline characteristics of the population were well matched between the three treatment groups. Mean age was 60, 25% were female, 56% of patients had an MI at presentation and 9% presented with signs of congestive heart failure defined by Killip class. One quarter had the onset of ACS within 24 hours
  7. The baseline characteristics of the population were well matched between the three treatment groups. Mean age was 60, 25% were female, 56% of patients had an MI at presentation and 9% presented with signs of congestive heart failure defined by Killip class. One quarter had the onset of ACS within 24 hours
  8. Each year, there are 2 million patients admitted to hospitals in the US with ACS who present in 2 broad categories: ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) ACS. Approximately 600,000 patients per year exhibit ECG changes consistent with STEMI and another 1.4 million patients show ECG changes reflecting NSTEMI or unstable angina (UA).
  9. Chest pain is the second most common reason for emergency department presentation (abdominal pain is #1) This is the breakdown of patient categories by discharge diagnosis Of the 2,000,000 discharged rapidly, about 24,000 are missed ACS, and many of these people go on to die. It is the number 1 reason for medical malpractice dollars lost by ED physicians in the USA. Of the 4,000,000 who are admitted, about 1.4M are non-cardiac chest pain 910,000 are non-ischemic cardiac causes (eg: congestive heart failure, arrhythmias) 900,000 are cardiac ischemia (stable and unstable angina) And 830,000 are AMI.