SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
Speaker Madigan’s Pension Proposal – HA #1 to Senate Bill 1
House Amendment #1 to Senate Bill 1 is a comprehensive package that will stabilize and bring solvency
to 4 of the State’s pension funds (GARS, SERS, SURS, and TRS). This package will ensure the State
meets its obligations to the pension systems by adopting an actuarially accepted payment schedule,
providing an enforceable funding guarantee, and altering benefits for current and prospective annuitants.
The concepts in this package are not new, and several have been approved by the House.
1) New funding schedule. The new schedule requires the systems to reach 100% funding in 30 years,
beginning in FY 15 and ending 2044.
2) New method for certifying contributions. Beginning in FY 15, contributions will be certified using
the entry age normal actuarial cost method (“EAN”) instead of the projected unit credit actuarial
method (“PUC”). The PUC method, which the systems currently use, requires higher contributions
closer to retirement. The EAN method averages costs evenly over the pensioner’s employment,
thereby resulting in more level contributions. This change was approved by the House in HB 1277
(Senger).
3) Supplemental contributions beginning in FY 20. The State currently makes payments on pension
obligation notes from 2010 and 2011, and in 2019, the State will make a final payment of $952
million. Once those payments end, the State commits to annually contribute $1 billion in addition to
the state’s scheduled contributions to the state-funded systems. The additional contributions will
continue until all systems reach their funding goal.
4) Provide a funding guarantee. If the State fails to make a required payment under the funding
schedule or fails to contribute the additional $1 billion promised above, the systems will have a right
to bring a mandamus action to compel the State to make the payment. Each Board will have a
fiduciary duty to bring an action if necessary. Payments compelled under this provision are expressly
subordinate to the state’s debt service obligations.
5) Establish a pensionable salary cap for Tier I employees. The amendment applies the Tier II
salary cap to Tier I employees. For 2013, the salary cap was $109,971. The cap will increase
annually by ½ the consumer price index for urban consumers. There is a grandfather clause for those
employees with salaries that currently exceeds the cap or will exceed the cap based on raises due to
the person under a current collective bargaining agreement. Under the proposal, a person whose
salary exceeds the salary cap is only eligible for an annuity based on the salary cap.
6) New method of calculating the COLA. Retired members will keep the compounded 3% annual
increases they received up until the enactment, but future COLAs will be calculated differently. Going
forward, the COLA will be based on 3% of a maximum annuity amount based on their years of
service. The cap will be $1,000 for each year the employee had worked ($800 for those coordinated
with Social Security). As an example, an individual retiring with 30 years of service will have a COLA
of 3% of $30,000 or $900, which accumulates annually. If a person’s initial annuity is under this
threshold, that person will continue receiving a 3% compounded adjustment based on their initial
annuity until they reach the cap. This adjustment was originally proposed by Senator Radogno and
incorporated in Senate Amendment #4 to SB 35.
Additionally, current and future retirees would have the first or next year in which they can receive
their COLA delayed. Retirees who are age 67 and older would be unaffected by this delay. Those
under age 67 would have their COLA paused until either they reach age 67 or until the 5th
anniversary of their retirement, whichever comes first.
1
7) Increase the retirement age for employees under 45 years old. The amendment raises the
retirement age, on a graduated scale, for current Tier I members who are under 45 years old (no
change for those 45 years of age or older). This language was approved by the House in HB1166
(Madigan) and is included in the Cross-Nekritz pension reform package (HB 3411).The retirement
age is increased by the following schedule:
• Age 40 to 44 – additional 1 year added to the applicable system’s minimum retirement age;
• Age 35 to 39 – additional 3 years added; and
• Below 35 – additional 5 years added.
8) Increase employee contributions by 2%. Beginning July 1, 2013, employees will be required to
contribute an additional 1%, and this is increased to 2% on July 1, 2014.
9) Eliminate the subject of pensions for collective bargaining. Bargaining units and employers with
participants in the State systems would be prohibited from negotiating changes related to pensions.
10) Fix the COLA for Tier II members of GARS. Under current law, the General Assembly and Judges’
Retirement systems have their salary cap and annuity increased by the lesser of CPI or 3%. All other
systems have their salary cap and annuity increased by the lesser of one-half of CPI or 3%. This
draft lowers the General Assembly Retirement System down to one-half of CPI to bring it in line with
other systems.
11) Prohibit non-governmental organizations from participating in State systems. The amendment
prevents new employees of several “non-governmental” organizations from participating under IMRF,
SURS, and TRS. Additionally, it prohibits new employees of all state systems from using sick time or
vacation time in calculating their annuity.
12) Change the effective rate of interest. The amendment suggests that the Comptroller adopt a more
conservative number for what is known as the “effective rate of interest” (“ERI”). Under current law,
the ERI determines benefits for university and community college employees hired before 2005. The
amendment still provides that the Comptroller set this rate, but advises a figure that will more
appropriately determine benefits for certain participants.
13) Prohibit the use of pension funds to pay costs associated with healthcare. The amendment
makes clear that the state funded pension systems are not to use retirement contributions for the
purpose of subsidizing the cost of retiree healthcare.
14) Require separate appropriation request for employer normal cost and amortization of the
unfunded liability. The Governor must introduce and the systems must certify these costs
separately.
2

More Related Content

More from Cook County Commissioner Bridget Gainer

Illinois supreme court decision in re pension reform litigation - May 8, 2015
Illinois supreme court decision in re pension reform litigation - May 8, 2015Illinois supreme court decision in re pension reform litigation - May 8, 2015
Illinois supreme court decision in re pension reform litigation - May 8, 2015Cook County Commissioner Bridget Gainer
 
Big Data vs. Smart Data: The Cook County Land Bank’s Data-Driven plan for lan...
Big Data vs. Smart Data: The Cook County Land Bank’s Data-Driven plan for lan...Big Data vs. Smart Data: The Cook County Land Bank’s Data-Driven plan for lan...
Big Data vs. Smart Data: The Cook County Land Bank’s Data-Driven plan for lan...Cook County Commissioner Bridget Gainer
 
University of illinois institute of government and public affairs six simpl...
University of illinois institute of government and public affairs   six simpl...University of illinois institute of government and public affairs   six simpl...
University of illinois institute of government and public affairs six simpl...Cook County Commissioner Bridget Gainer
 
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...Cook County Commissioner Bridget Gainer
 
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...Cook County Commissioner Bridget Gainer
 
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Path to Solvency II, Health Care Spend & Pensio...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Path to Solvency II, Health Care Spend & Pensio...Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Path to Solvency II, Health Care Spend & Pensio...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Path to Solvency II, Health Care Spend & Pensio...Cook County Commissioner Bridget Gainer
 
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: 2010 Citizens' Guide - Uptown Health Needs Asses...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: 2010 Citizens' Guide - Uptown Health Needs Asses...Commissioner Bridget Gainer: 2010 Citizens' Guide - Uptown Health Needs Asses...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: 2010 Citizens' Guide - Uptown Health Needs Asses...Cook County Commissioner Bridget Gainer
 

More from Cook County Commissioner Bridget Gainer (20)

Illinois supreme court decision in re pension reform litigation - May 8, 2015
Illinois supreme court decision in re pension reform litigation - May 8, 2015Illinois supreme court decision in re pension reform litigation - May 8, 2015
Illinois supreme court decision in re pension reform litigation - May 8, 2015
 
Illinois senate bill 1 il pension reform legislation
Illinois senate bill 1   il pension reform legislationIllinois senate bill 1   il pension reform legislation
Illinois senate bill 1 il pension reform legislation
 
Sb1523 house amendment 3 by speaker michael madigan
Sb1523   house amendment 3 by speaker michael madiganSb1523   house amendment 3 by speaker michael madigan
Sb1523 house amendment 3 by speaker michael madigan
 
The Cook County Land Bank Authority Data & Analytics Tools
The Cook County Land Bank Authority Data & Analytics ToolsThe Cook County Land Bank Authority Data & Analytics Tools
The Cook County Land Bank Authority Data & Analytics Tools
 
July 11, 2013 data & analytics committee notice and agenda
July 11, 2013 data & analytics committee notice and agendaJuly 11, 2013 data & analytics committee notice and agenda
July 11, 2013 data & analytics committee notice and agenda
 
Big Data vs. Smart Data: The Cook County Land Bank’s Data-Driven plan for lan...
Big Data vs. Smart Data: The Cook County Land Bank’s Data-Driven plan for lan...Big Data vs. Smart Data: The Cook County Land Bank’s Data-Driven plan for lan...
Big Data vs. Smart Data: The Cook County Land Bank’s Data-Driven plan for lan...
 
CCLBA Data & analytics presentation july 11, 2013
CCLBA Data & analytics presentation july 11, 2013CCLBA Data & analytics presentation july 11, 2013
CCLBA Data & analytics presentation july 11, 2013
 
July 9
July 9July 9
July 9
 
Bridget Gainer: June 19 2013 Pension Committee Report
Bridget Gainer: June 19 2013 Pension Committee ReportBridget Gainer: June 19 2013 Pension Committee Report
Bridget Gainer: June 19 2013 Pension Committee Report
 
University of illinois institute of government and public affairs six simpl...
University of illinois institute of government and public affairs   six simpl...University of illinois institute of government and public affairs   six simpl...
University of illinois institute of government and public affairs six simpl...
 
Union proposal summary
Union proposal summaryUnion proposal summary
Union proposal summary
 
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - January 8 2013 newsletter
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - January 8 2013 newsletterCommissioner Bridget Gainer - January 8 2013 newsletter
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - January 8 2013 newsletter
 
OpenPensions.Org: What Does This Mean To Me
OpenPensions.Org: What Does This Mean To MeOpenPensions.Org: What Does This Mean To Me
OpenPensions.Org: What Does This Mean To Me
 
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...
 
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Cook County Pension Fund 2011 Investment Return...
 
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Path to Solvency II, Health Care Spend & Pensio...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Path to Solvency II, Health Care Spend & Pensio...Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Path to Solvency II, Health Care Spend & Pensio...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer - Path to Solvency II, Health Care Spend & Pensio...
 
"Truth In Numbers" Report: Cook County Pension Fund
"Truth In Numbers" Report: Cook County Pension Fund"Truth In Numbers" Report: Cook County Pension Fund
"Truth In Numbers" Report: Cook County Pension Fund
 
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: 2010 Citizens' Guide - Uptown Health Needs Asses...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: 2010 Citizens' Guide - Uptown Health Needs Asses...Commissioner Bridget Gainer: 2010 Citizens' Guide - Uptown Health Needs Asses...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: 2010 Citizens' Guide - Uptown Health Needs Asses...
 
Cook County Pension SubCommittee Meeting: December 4, 2012
Cook County Pension SubCommittee Meeting: December 4, 2012Cook County Pension SubCommittee Meeting: December 4, 2012
Cook County Pension SubCommittee Meeting: December 4, 2012
 
County Pension Committee Meeting: December 4, 2012
County Pension Committee Meeting: December 4, 2012County Pension Committee Meeting: December 4, 2012
County Pension Committee Meeting: December 4, 2012
 

138730080 speaker-madigan’s-pension-proposal

  • 1. Speaker Madigan’s Pension Proposal – HA #1 to Senate Bill 1 House Amendment #1 to Senate Bill 1 is a comprehensive package that will stabilize and bring solvency to 4 of the State’s pension funds (GARS, SERS, SURS, and TRS). This package will ensure the State meets its obligations to the pension systems by adopting an actuarially accepted payment schedule, providing an enforceable funding guarantee, and altering benefits for current and prospective annuitants. The concepts in this package are not new, and several have been approved by the House. 1) New funding schedule. The new schedule requires the systems to reach 100% funding in 30 years, beginning in FY 15 and ending 2044. 2) New method for certifying contributions. Beginning in FY 15, contributions will be certified using the entry age normal actuarial cost method (“EAN”) instead of the projected unit credit actuarial method (“PUC”). The PUC method, which the systems currently use, requires higher contributions closer to retirement. The EAN method averages costs evenly over the pensioner’s employment, thereby resulting in more level contributions. This change was approved by the House in HB 1277 (Senger). 3) Supplemental contributions beginning in FY 20. The State currently makes payments on pension obligation notes from 2010 and 2011, and in 2019, the State will make a final payment of $952 million. Once those payments end, the State commits to annually contribute $1 billion in addition to the state’s scheduled contributions to the state-funded systems. The additional contributions will continue until all systems reach their funding goal. 4) Provide a funding guarantee. If the State fails to make a required payment under the funding schedule or fails to contribute the additional $1 billion promised above, the systems will have a right to bring a mandamus action to compel the State to make the payment. Each Board will have a fiduciary duty to bring an action if necessary. Payments compelled under this provision are expressly subordinate to the state’s debt service obligations. 5) Establish a pensionable salary cap for Tier I employees. The amendment applies the Tier II salary cap to Tier I employees. For 2013, the salary cap was $109,971. The cap will increase annually by ½ the consumer price index for urban consumers. There is a grandfather clause for those employees with salaries that currently exceeds the cap or will exceed the cap based on raises due to the person under a current collective bargaining agreement. Under the proposal, a person whose salary exceeds the salary cap is only eligible for an annuity based on the salary cap. 6) New method of calculating the COLA. Retired members will keep the compounded 3% annual increases they received up until the enactment, but future COLAs will be calculated differently. Going forward, the COLA will be based on 3% of a maximum annuity amount based on their years of service. The cap will be $1,000 for each year the employee had worked ($800 for those coordinated with Social Security). As an example, an individual retiring with 30 years of service will have a COLA of 3% of $30,000 or $900, which accumulates annually. If a person’s initial annuity is under this threshold, that person will continue receiving a 3% compounded adjustment based on their initial annuity until they reach the cap. This adjustment was originally proposed by Senator Radogno and incorporated in Senate Amendment #4 to SB 35. Additionally, current and future retirees would have the first or next year in which they can receive their COLA delayed. Retirees who are age 67 and older would be unaffected by this delay. Those under age 67 would have their COLA paused until either they reach age 67 or until the 5th anniversary of their retirement, whichever comes first. 1
  • 2. 7) Increase the retirement age for employees under 45 years old. The amendment raises the retirement age, on a graduated scale, for current Tier I members who are under 45 years old (no change for those 45 years of age or older). This language was approved by the House in HB1166 (Madigan) and is included in the Cross-Nekritz pension reform package (HB 3411).The retirement age is increased by the following schedule: • Age 40 to 44 – additional 1 year added to the applicable system’s minimum retirement age; • Age 35 to 39 – additional 3 years added; and • Below 35 – additional 5 years added. 8) Increase employee contributions by 2%. Beginning July 1, 2013, employees will be required to contribute an additional 1%, and this is increased to 2% on July 1, 2014. 9) Eliminate the subject of pensions for collective bargaining. Bargaining units and employers with participants in the State systems would be prohibited from negotiating changes related to pensions. 10) Fix the COLA for Tier II members of GARS. Under current law, the General Assembly and Judges’ Retirement systems have their salary cap and annuity increased by the lesser of CPI or 3%. All other systems have their salary cap and annuity increased by the lesser of one-half of CPI or 3%. This draft lowers the General Assembly Retirement System down to one-half of CPI to bring it in line with other systems. 11) Prohibit non-governmental organizations from participating in State systems. The amendment prevents new employees of several “non-governmental” organizations from participating under IMRF, SURS, and TRS. Additionally, it prohibits new employees of all state systems from using sick time or vacation time in calculating their annuity. 12) Change the effective rate of interest. The amendment suggests that the Comptroller adopt a more conservative number for what is known as the “effective rate of interest” (“ERI”). Under current law, the ERI determines benefits for university and community college employees hired before 2005. The amendment still provides that the Comptroller set this rate, but advises a figure that will more appropriately determine benefits for certain participants. 13) Prohibit the use of pension funds to pay costs associated with healthcare. The amendment makes clear that the state funded pension systems are not to use retirement contributions for the purpose of subsidizing the cost of retiree healthcare. 14) Require separate appropriation request for employer normal cost and amortization of the unfunded liability. The Governor must introduce and the systems must certify these costs separately. 2