SlideShare a Scribd company logo

Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

•Download as PPT, PDF•
•
B
Bert Granberg

- Project Overview - State BB Map with state base maps and locator services - Availability Analysis using 2010 census block level housing unit counts - Mobile broadband drive testing, 6000 miles - Address points

TechnologyBusiness
1 of 44
Utah Broadband Project: Mapping Update Bert Granberg Utah AGRC
Broadband Mapping: Provider Participation in Utah’s April 2011 NTIA Data Submission ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Data Submissions: Service Areas, Speeds, Tech Type Infrastructure, Anchor Institutions, etc. Electronic Upload Pen & Ink Web Conference Map Views ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Where does the data go? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Overall State Coverage
Service By Address
Technology + Speed Filter: Wireless
Provider Filter: Rural Telecoms
Provider Filter: Rural Telecoms
10 Day Update Cycle
Maximum Advertised Speed Map Technology Hierarchy Map
Broadband Availability Analysis
2010 Census Block Data
Process ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
“ Trimmed Census Blocks” ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Before After
Results
Class #1: Basic Consumer ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Class #2: Home Office/Entertainment ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Mobile Wireless Availability July 2011 Field Tests
Utah Broadband Project: Drive Testing Background ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Utah Broadband Project: Drive Testing Goals ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Mobile Broadband, 2011 Drive Testing Routes
Drive Testing, July 4 – July 23, 2010 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Mapping Infrastructure: Available Technology
Mapping Infrastructure: Signal Strength ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Mapping Infrastructure: Down/Up Link Speed ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
PSAP Status Maps w/ Wireless Availability Estimation April 2011 Broadband Data: Mobile Wireless April 2010 American Roamer Cellular Coverage + Mobile Voice/BB Availability is Critical for 911 Dispatch
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Building Statewide Address Points Using Statewide Address Points ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Maintaining Statewide Address Points Address Point Standards ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],vote Address Points
 
Mapping Infrastructure: Available Technology
Competition ,[object Object],[object Object],Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Class #3: Higher Capacity ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Services Classes Map Note: This map does not currently show class assignments for unincorporated, unnamed areas
Mapped Broadband Technologies
Mobile Availability ,[object Object],[object Object],Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Unserved ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet UnservHUPct
DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
Fall 2011 Mapping Initiatives ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Broadband Map Tour

Recommended

Ofcom UK CMR 2008 Charts
Ofcom UK CMR 2008 ChartsOfcom UK CMR 2008 Charts
Ofcom UK CMR 2008 Charts
comment.ofcom
 
Ontornet
OntornetOntornet
Ontornet
ontornet
 
Nigeria mobile consumer
Nigeria mobile consumerNigeria mobile consumer
Nigeria mobile consumer
Adrian Lee
 
Utah Broadband Advisory Council Presentation
Utah Broadband Advisory Council PresentationUtah Broadband Advisory Council Presentation
Utah Broadband Advisory Council Presentation
Utah Broadband Project
 
Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011
Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011
Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011
Bert Granberg
 
Fyp proposal writing
Fyp proposal writingFyp proposal writing
Fyp proposal writing
Asyikin Rahim
 
Final year projects orientation 2009
Final year projects orientation 2009Final year projects orientation 2009
Final year projects orientation 2009
Mr SMAK
 
RF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor Amplifier
RF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor AmplifierRF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor Amplifier
RF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor Amplifier
Simen Li
 

Recommended

Ofcom UK CMR 2008 Charts
Ofcom UK CMR 2008 ChartsOfcom UK CMR 2008 Charts
Ofcom UK CMR 2008 Charts
comment.ofcom
 
Ontornet
OntornetOntornet
Ontornet
ontornet
 
Nigeria mobile consumer
Nigeria mobile consumerNigeria mobile consumer
Nigeria mobile consumer
Adrian Lee
 
Utah Broadband Advisory Council Presentation
Utah Broadband Advisory Council PresentationUtah Broadband Advisory Council Presentation
Utah Broadband Advisory Council Presentation
Utah Broadband Project
 
Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011
Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011
Utah Broadband Project Presentation to State 911 Committee, June 16 2011
Bert Granberg
 
Fyp proposal writing
Fyp proposal writingFyp proposal writing
Fyp proposal writing
Asyikin Rahim
 
Final year projects orientation 2009
Final year projects orientation 2009Final year projects orientation 2009
Final year projects orientation 2009
Mr SMAK
 
RF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor Amplifier
RF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor AmplifierRF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor Amplifier
RF Circuit Design - [Ch4-1] Microwave Transistor Amplifier
Simen Li
 
Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Bert Granberg
 
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
Kantar TNS
 
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendation
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendationCentury Link (CTL) equity recommendation
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendation
tibarnes
 
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdfP33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
CarolinaZambranoMala
 
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
Christoph Stork
 
Second Quarter 2004 Results En
Second Quarter 2004 Results EnSecond Quarter 2004 Results En
Second Quarter 2004 Results En
TIM RI
 
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
TIM RI
 
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
Indonesia Network Operators Group
 
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African TelcosOTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
Steve Esselaar
 
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
APNIC
 
When Micromobility Attacks
When Micromobility AttacksWhen Micromobility Attacks
When Micromobility Attacks
Horace Dediu
 
Sample of report & Snail trail Defect
Sample of report & Snail trail DefectSample of report & Snail trail Defect
Sample of report & Snail trail Defect
Shiv Verma
 
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG EditionA review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
APNIC
 
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
Marco Pangos
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
CarolinaZambranoMala
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
CarolinaZambranoMala
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
CarolinaZambranoMala
 
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
APNIC
 
Market Sizing Study
Market Sizing StudyMarket Sizing Study
Market Sizing Study
CABA
 
Presentation Correlation and Volatility Eurex
Presentation Correlation and Volatility EurexPresentation Correlation and Volatility Eurex
Presentation Correlation and Volatility Eurex
J Carlos López-Moraleja, CAIA, CHP, ICFA
 
Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
Bert Granberg
 
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRSUsing Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
Bert Granberg
 

More Related Content

Similar to Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Bert Granberg
 
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
Kantar TNS
 
Second Quarter 2004 Results En
Second Quarter 2004 Results EnSecond Quarter 2004 Results En
Second Quarter 2004 Results En
TIM RI
 
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
TIM RI
 
Sample of report & Snail trail Defect
Sample of report & Snail trail DefectSample of report & Snail trail Defect
Sample of report & Snail trail Defect
Shiv Verma
 
Market Sizing Study
Market Sizing StudyMarket Sizing Study
Market Sizing Study
CABA
 

Similar to Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation (20)

Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
Utah Broadband Project, Draft Summary Stats Aug '11
 
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
 
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendation
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendationCentury Link (CTL) equity recommendation
Century Link (CTL) equity recommendation
 
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdfP33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
P33_Nal_Comercial.pdf
 
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
Over The Top (OTT) applications and the Internet Value Chain
 
Second Quarter 2004 Results En
Second Quarter 2004 Results EnSecond Quarter 2004 Results En
Second Quarter 2004 Results En
 
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
TIM - Results Presentation 2Q13
 
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
14 - IDNOG03 - George Michaelson (APNIC) - IPV6-in-2016-IDNOG
 
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African TelcosOTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
OTTs - Threat or opportunity for African Telcos
 
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
CNNIC OPM 2017: Global IPv6 Trends in 2017
 
When Micromobility Attacks
When Micromobility AttacksWhen Micromobility Attacks
When Micromobility Attacks
 
Sample of report & Snail trail Defect
Sample of report & Snail trail DefectSample of report & Snail trail Defect
Sample of report & Snail trail Defect
 
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG EditionA review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
A review of current worldwide IPv6 deployment - HKNOG Edition
 
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
Market Insight Marco Pangos 16mar09
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
 
P33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdfP33TotalNal.pdf
P33TotalNal.pdf
 
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
38th TWNIC OPM: IPv6 deployment update
 
Market Sizing Study
Market Sizing StudyMarket Sizing Study
Market Sizing Study
 
Presentation Correlation and Volatility Eurex
Presentation Correlation and Volatility EurexPresentation Correlation and Volatility Eurex
Presentation Correlation and Volatility Eurex
 

More from Bert Granberg

Utah Address Point Background 20101214
Utah Address Point Background 20101214Utah Address Point Background 20101214
Utah Address Point Background 20101214
Bert Granberg
 

More from Bert Granberg (7)

Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
Utah Broadband Project, Mapping Activities and Resources, June 2011
 
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRSUsing Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
Using Utah's Linear Referencing GIS Layer: SGID93.Transportation.UDOTRoutes_LRS
 
Rethinking Geocoding In Utah
Rethinking Geocoding In UtahRethinking Geocoding In Utah
Rethinking Geocoding In Utah
 
Utah Broadband Map 20110406
Utah Broadband Map 20110406Utah Broadband Map 20110406
Utah Broadband Map 20110406
 
Utah Address Point Background 20101214
Utah Address Point Background 20101214Utah Address Point Background 20101214
Utah Address Point Background 20101214
 
Salt Lake Solar Ignite
Salt Lake Solar IgniteSalt Lake Solar Ignite
Salt Lake Solar Ignite
 
Utah GIS Address & Centerline Statewide Resources: Uses, Users, Challenges
Utah GIS Address & Centerline Statewide Resources: Uses, Users, ChallengesUtah GIS Address & Centerline Statewide Resources: Uses, Users, Challenges
Utah GIS Address & Centerline Statewide Resources: Uses, Users, Challenges
 

Recently uploaded

Structuring Teams and Portfolios for Success
Structuring Teams and Portfolios for SuccessStructuring Teams and Portfolios for Success
Structuring Teams and Portfolios for Success
UXDXConf
 
Integrating Telephony Systems with Salesforce: Insights and Considerations, B...
Integrating Telephony Systems with Salesforce: Insights and Considerations, B...Integrating Telephony Systems with Salesforce: Insights and Considerations, B...
Integrating Telephony Systems with Salesforce: Insights and Considerations, B...
CzechDreamin
 
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered Quality
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualitySoftware Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered Quality
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered Quality
Inflectra
 
A Business-Centric Approach to Design System Strategy
A Business-Centric Approach to Design System StrategyA Business-Centric Approach to Design System Strategy
A Business-Centric Approach to Design System Strategy
UXDXConf
 
Connecting the Dots in Product Design at KAYAK
Connecting the Dots in Product Design at KAYAKConnecting the Dots in Product Design at KAYAK
Connecting the Dots in Product Design at KAYAK
UXDXConf
 
Unpacking Value Delivery - Agile Oxford Meetup - May 2024.pptx
Unpacking Value Delivery - Agile Oxford Meetup - May 2024.pptxUnpacking Value Delivery - Agile Oxford Meetup - May 2024.pptx
Unpacking Value Delivery - Agile Oxford Meetup - May 2024.pptx
David Michel
 
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and Grafana
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaJMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and Grafana
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and Grafana
RTTS
 
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024
Tobias Schneck
 
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...
Jeffrey Haguewood
 

Recently uploaded (20)

UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 2
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 2UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 2
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 2
 
To Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMs
To Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMsTo Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMs
To Graph or Not to Graph Knowledge Graph Architectures and LLMs
 
AI presentation and introduction - Retrieval Augmented Generation RAG 101
AI presentation and introduction - Retrieval Augmented Generation RAG 101AI presentation and introduction - Retrieval Augmented Generation RAG 101
AI presentation and introduction - Retrieval Augmented Generation RAG 101
 
Structuring Teams and Portfolios for Success
Structuring Teams and Portfolios for SuccessStructuring Teams and Portfolios for Success
Structuring Teams and Portfolios for Success
 
Integrating Telephony Systems with Salesforce: Insights and Considerations, B...
Integrating Telephony Systems with Salesforce: Insights and Considerations, B...Integrating Telephony Systems with Salesforce: Insights and Considerations, B...
Integrating Telephony Systems with Salesforce: Insights and Considerations, B...
 
Intelligent Gimbal FINAL PAPER Engineering.pdf
Intelligent Gimbal FINAL PAPER Engineering.pdfIntelligent Gimbal FINAL PAPER Engineering.pdf
Intelligent Gimbal FINAL PAPER Engineering.pdf
 
Introduction to Open Source RAG and RAG Evaluation
Introduction to Open Source RAG and RAG EvaluationIntroduction to Open Source RAG and RAG Evaluation
Introduction to Open Source RAG and RAG Evaluation
 
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered Quality
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered QualitySoftware Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered Quality
Software Delivery At the Speed of AI: Inflectra Invests In AI-Powered Quality
 
The architecture of Generative AI for enterprises.pdf
The architecture of Generative AI for enterprises.pdfThe architecture of Generative AI for enterprises.pdf
The architecture of Generative AI for enterprises.pdf
 
A Business-Centric Approach to Design System Strategy
A Business-Centric Approach to Design System StrategyA Business-Centric Approach to Design System Strategy
A Business-Centric Approach to Design System Strategy
 
Measures in SQL (a talk at SF Distributed Systems meetup, 2024-05-22)
Measures in SQL (a talk at SF Distributed Systems meetup, 2024-05-22)Measures in SQL (a talk at SF Distributed Systems meetup, 2024-05-22)
Measures in SQL (a talk at SF Distributed Systems meetup, 2024-05-22)
 
Speed Wins: From Kafka to APIs in Minutes
Speed Wins: From Kafka to APIs in MinutesSpeed Wins: From Kafka to APIs in Minutes
Speed Wins: From Kafka to APIs in Minutes
 
Connecting the Dots in Product Design at KAYAK
Connecting the Dots in Product Design at KAYAKConnecting the Dots in Product Design at KAYAK
Connecting the Dots in Product Design at KAYAK
 
Unpacking Value Delivery - Agile Oxford Meetup - May 2024.pptx
Unpacking Value Delivery - Agile Oxford Meetup - May 2024.pptxUnpacking Value Delivery - Agile Oxford Meetup - May 2024.pptx
Unpacking Value Delivery - Agile Oxford Meetup - May 2024.pptx
 
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and Grafana
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaJMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and Grafana
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and Grafana
 
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024
 
Free and Effective: Making Flows Publicly Accessible, Yumi Ibrahimzade
Free and Effective: Making Flows Publicly Accessible, Yumi IbrahimzadeFree and Effective: Making Flows Publicly Accessible, Yumi Ibrahimzade
Free and Effective: Making Flows Publicly Accessible, Yumi Ibrahimzade
 
WSO2CONMay2024OpenSourceConferenceDebrief.pptx
WSO2CONMay2024OpenSourceConferenceDebrief.pptxWSO2CONMay2024OpenSourceConferenceDebrief.pptx
WSO2CONMay2024OpenSourceConferenceDebrief.pptx
 
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...
 
Agentic RAG What it is its types applications and implementation.pdf
Agentic RAG What it is its types applications and implementation.pdfAgentic RAG What it is its types applications and implementation.pdf
Agentic RAG What it is its types applications and implementation.pdf
 

Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

  • 1. Utah Broadband Project: Mapping Update Bert Granberg Utah AGRC
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 7. Technology + Speed Filter: Wireless
  • 10. 10 Day Update Cycle
  • 11. Maximum Advertised Speed Map Technology Hierarchy Map
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 17.
  • 18. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 19.
  • 20. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 21. Mobile Wireless Availability July 2011 Field Tests
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24. Mobile Broadband, 2011 Drive Testing Routes
  • 25.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29. PSAP Status Maps w/ Wireless Availability Estimation April 2011 Broadband Data: Mobile Wireless April 2010 American Roamer Cellular Coverage + Mobile Voice/BB Availability is Critical for 911 Dispatch
  • 30.
  • 31.  
  • 33.
  • 34. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 35.
  • 36. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 37. Services Classes Map Note: This map does not currently show class assignments for unincorporated, unnamed areas
  • 39.
  • 40. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 41.
  • 42. DRAFT County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00% BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79% CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30% CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44% DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00% DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32% DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00% EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01% GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00% GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00% IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00% JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57% KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00% MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00% MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91% PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00% RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70% SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66% SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00% SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68% SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00% SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03% TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66% UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00% UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55% WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92% WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82% WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00% WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%
  • 43.