Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.

OKFest2014 glam-survey_workshop_20140717

1.113 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

OKFest 2014, Berlin. Workshop regarding the OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey.

Veröffentlicht in: Wissenschaft
  • D0WNL0AD FULL ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ http://1lite.top/82yim ◀ ◀ ◀ ◀
    Sind Sie sicher, dass Sie …  Ja  Nein
    Ihre Nachricht erscheint hier
  • Gehören Sie zu den Ersten, denen das gefällt!

OKFest2014 glam-survey_workshop_20140717

  1. 1. Getting Ready for the OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey 17 July 2014 – OKFest, Berlin ▶ Bern University of Applied Sciences | E-Government Institute || Open Knowledge | OpenGLAM Working Group Alte Nationalgalerie (Berlin), Wikimedia Commons, Thomas Wolf, CC-by-sa This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.
  2. 2. ▶ Introduction to the OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey project Beat Estermann ▶ Getting a maximum out of the survey • The Netherlands Joris Pekel • Finland Laura Sillanpää • India Subhasish Panigrahi ▶ Discussion and Questions & Answers Moderation: Lieke Ploeger Welcome!
  3. 3. Introduction to the OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey Project
  4. 4. ▶ Online survey conducted among heritage institutions throughout the world in the second half of 2014. ▶ Focusing on questions related to digitization, exchange of metadata, open data/open content, semantic web, social media, crowdsourcing ▶ Inspired by an earlier pilot survey, carried out in Switzerland in 2012 ▶ Organized in a federative manner, which means that the organization depends on volunteers and partners in each country What is the OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey about?
  5. 5. ▶ Measure the state of advancement of OpenGLAM in the participating countries ▶ Inform the GLAM community about the latest developments in the area of OpenGLAM ▶ Identify potential partners for open data and/or crowdsourcing projects ▶ Use the study report as a communication instrument to promote OpenGLAM ▶ Use the study report as an instrument for lobbying activities in favour of OpenGLAM and the advancement of free knowledge ▶ Provide international comparisons: • Allowing each country to see where it stands compared to other countries. • Provide the international OpenGLAM community with a tool that helps it better understand the particularities of each country What do we want to achieve?
  6. 6. Overview of participating countries Further countries are welcome to join! Overview: https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/OpenGLAM_Benchmark_Survey/Participating_countries Participation status (as of 17 July 2014) Green: committed Yellow: awaiting confirmation Underlying graphic file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BlankMap-World-v2.png Roke et al. (CC-by-sa)
  7. 7. ▶ Join one of the national teams or set-up your own! ▶ Main tasks at the national level: • Ensure the translation of the questionnaire into your national language(s) • Gather e-mail contacts of the heritage institutions in your country • Answer questions during the adminstration of the questionnaire ▶ Optional: • Promote the survey results in your country • Carry out country-specific analyses of the survey data • Promote OpenGLAM in your country How can you contribute?
  8. 8. Getting a maximum out of the survey • The Netherlands • Finland • India
  9. 9. The Netherlands George Hendrik Breitner - De Singelbrug bij de Paleisstraat. Rijksmuseum (Public Domain)
  10. 10. ▶ OpenCultuurData.nl ▶ NL Wikimedia chapter has (payed) GLAMwiki coordinator ▶ Largest provider of open images in Europeana ▶ Number of international key players such as the Rijksmuseum, Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision and the National Library ▶ Open culture initiatives get some funding from the ministry of culture ▶ Very often one department very active, the other one not at all. ▶ Smaller and mid-size institutions getting more interest in opening their collections, lots of questions about how to best do this OpenGLAM in the Netherlands
  11. 11. ▶ What do we want to get out of this survey? ▶ Data! ▶ Mapping the sector ▶ Encourage institutions to think about their digital strategy ▶ Go beyond „The usual suspects“ ▶ What we have done so far: ▶ Help develop the survey questions ▶ Pre-test with a number of institutions ▶ People contacted very enthousiastic ▶ Difficulty with getting contact details. Mostly our own networks Implementing the OpenGLAM Survey in the Netherlands
  12. 12. ▶ How to reach the people that are not in some way thinking about opening up their colllections already, should we? ▶ What to do if the museum associations etc. are not willing to share their contacts/the survey? ▶ What would be a minimum number of respondents to make it useful? Questions
  13. 13. ▶ The Finnish context: ▶ Digitisation of cultural objects increased substantially after 2008: The Ministry of Education and Culture’s discretionary funding ▶ Finland still behind many European countries in terms of open cultural data and related aspects of openness ▶ Open cultural data master course in 2014 by Open Knowledge Finland ▶ Local objectives for OpenGLAM Benchmark Survey ▶ Help spread awareness of open culture and cultural data in general ▶ Map the actual situation in relation to open cultural data & learn what is needed ▶ Compare the Finnish situation with those of other countries and learn from good practices Finland http://avoinglam.fi https://twitter.com/avoinglam https://www.flickr.com/avoinglam
  14. 14. India आदिवासी कलाकारों द्वारा नृत्य प्रिर्शन.jpg by User:Anilbhardwajnoida/Wikimedia Commons. CC-BY-SA 3.0
  15. 15. India ▶ Wikimedia India chapter and WMF's India program worked together for India's first GLAM project ▶ Good traction of image contribution during the Wiki Loves Monument photo contest ▶ Mass communication and other media institutions slowly taking interst in open audio library ▶ OpenGLAM initiatives related to digitization could get support from the government as digitization is a priority across departments ▶ Majority of GLAM institutions lack knowledge about open culture, need for outreach ▶ Relicensing and book digitization have gained public interest
  16. 16. ▶ What do we want to get out of this survey? ▶ Data! ▶ Mapping the sector ▶ Encourage institutions to think about their digital strategy ▶ Show institutions "what is there for them“ ▶ What we have done so far: ▶ Started filing Right to Information (RT) asking the state government departments for lists of institutions ▶ Reached out to WMIN seeking help for creating a list ▶ Difficulty with getting people and contact details Implementing the OpenGLAM Survey in India
  17. 17. ▶ What to do if the museum associations etc. are not willing to share their contacts/the survey? ▶ What would be a minimum number of respondents to make it useful? Questions
  18. 18. Discussion Questions & Answers
  19. 19. ▶ Contact Details: • Beat Estermann E-mail: beat.estermann@bfh.ch Phone: +41 31 848 34 38 • Lieke Ploeger E-mail: lieke.ploeger@okfn.org ▶ Project Portal: • http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/OpenGLAM_Benchmark_Survey Thank you for your participation!