2. Only an Appetizer
• Reflection in a complex modern
society
• Alternative paradigm
• Redefining and redesigning
• Alternative sanitation
• Alternative components and systems
4. Reflection
• Mixing & Dilution – best solution to polution?
• Problems are not automaticly solved with more
of the same thinking (Paradigm) that created the
problem in the first place.
• Why do human beings with two outlets create
and use toilets with only one inlet?
10. International Year of
Sanitation 2008
• Raising awareness of the importance of sanitation and
its impact on achieving other MDGs, from three
perspectives: hygiene, household sanitation and
wastewater.
• Encouraging Governments and its partners to promote
and implement policies and actions for meeting the
sanitation target.
• Mobilizing communities, particularly women’s groups,
towards changing sanitation and hygiene practices
through sanitation-health-education campaigns.
11.
12.
13.
14. Single household level
• Direct use after collection is
acceptable on the single household
level.
• Additional stricter recommendations
may apply on a local level , in the
case of a frequent fecal cross-
contamination.
15.
16.
17.
18. Alternative Paradigm of Closing The
Loop in Alternative Sanitation
• Ecology
• Sustainability
• Resources
• Source control
• Participation
• Decision making
19. Alternative Paradigm of Closing The
Loop in Alternative Sanitation
• Alternative questions and answers
• Different streams and flows
• Source control
• Nutrients, organic material, water etc.
• Diversion and concentrated collection
• Reuse of resources to plant growth
• Redefining
• Redesigning
21. Flow or Stream of Material
• Urine
• Faeces
• Toilet paper
• Flush water
• Grey water
22. Flow or Stream of Material
• We almost excrete the same amount of
nutrients as we consume
• Human urine contributes with only 1 % of
the volume of household wastewater but
contains 80 % of N, 55 % of P and 60 %
of K in household wastewater and less
than 0.6 % of cadmium and 0.06 % of
lead
23. Alternative Approach
and Design
• Human urine (yellow water or High Quality
Anthropogenic Nutrient Solutions) and
human faeces
• Diverted and concentrated collection
• Waterless or reduced water flush
• Alternative sanitary components
• Alternative sanitary systems
24. Selected Components
• Waterless urinals
• No-Mix/Diverting toilet stools
• Collection and composting units
• Anaerobic fermentation
• Willow evapotranspiration bed
• Willow plantation
27. Waterless Urinal
• 100 % collection used by men
• 100 % concentration
• Low storage volume
• Concentrated fertilizer
• No accepted solution for women
66. Diverting Waterless Toilet
• Estimated values
• 100 % urine collection for most men
• 80 – 100 % for most women
• 0 – 50 % for very few women
• 60 – 100 % concentration
• Very small amounts of nutrients lost
during proper storage.
90. Storage - Composting
• Total reduction in volume - 88 %
• Big losses of nutrients
• High humidity – 81.8 – 77.0 %
• Low temperature 3 – 21.4 degrees C.
• Large reduction in indicator bacterias
• Nice looking and smelling end product
93. Separator
Estimated values for particle outlet
• 4.0 – 8.8 % DM and 2.7 – 5.8 % VS
• Ideal 10 % DM
• Ideal 80 % of DM and VS
• Ideal 70 % of N, P and K
• Worst case 0.22 % DM and 0.16 % VS
124. Technical Data
• Plants on 556 m2 surface, 50.5 m2/p
• Willow clones 78-195 + 78-082, 2400 Sticks
• Total surface, 707 m2, 64 m2/p
• 690 m3 over fibre textile, 150 m3 under
• Estimated water storage volume, 35 %
• 520 mm wastewater/a,11 p, 80-90 l/p/a
• 512 kg N/a, 95 kg P/a and 188 kg K/a
125. Precipitation and Evaporation
• Average 30-years precipitation 562 mm
• Average 1992-96 + 1999 769 mm
• 1993 910 mm
• 1994 970 mm
• 1999 907 mm
• Penman evaporation 572 mm
• Evapotranspiration 1310 - 1370 mm
126. Biomass Growth and
Evapotranspiration
Biomass growth
• 1992 3 t DM/ha/a
• 1992-1994 14.4 t DM/ha/a
• 1996-1999 8.5 t DM/ha/a
Evapotranspiration
• 1992-1996 1301 mm/a
• 1999 1366 mm/a
127. Results
• Good running stability
• Good evapotranspiration, 1310 – 1370
mm/a
• Up to 60 % capacity used for rainwater
• Only 30 – 40 % storage volume in bed
• No indications of heavy metals as limiting
factor for future handling of soil
• Sodium-cloride a limiting factor but can be
pumped out during low water levels
128. Further Developement
• Potential use of source controle sanitation to
reduce the amount of sodium chloride and surplus
of nutrient directed to the bed.
• Use of optimal willow clones with a even bigger
evapotranspiration potential in order to minimise
the surface and cost of the bed.
• Discharge of rainwater from the surface before
contact with the wastewater to minimise volume,
surface and cost of the bed.
• Raising the pore volume in the beds from 35 %
up to 80 %.
• Easy access to pump out sodium chloride