Evaluation of training
19. Jan 2012•0 gefällt mir•38,900 views
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Melden
Business
Technologie
Learning Resource for HRM , HRD professionals and MBA students on how to evaluate training
Self-employedFolgen
Más contenido relacionado
Was ist angesagt?
Training & developmentAshwathy Nair
Trainingrajeevgupta
Employee Training & developmentNcell
Training evaluation ppt 6SBMC Jobs
give the best solutions on training and devlopmentNithin Kumar
Training and developmentantocharles
Similar a Evaluation of training
MED07_joycepagkatipunan.pdfJOYCEPAGKATIPUNAN
Training2pdlrobinson
Measuring Roi Of Training & Development Ravinder TulsianiRavinder Tulsiani
Measuring ROI of Training Yodhia Antariksa
Tarining evaluation Rahul Rajan
Training evaluationN A M COLLEGE KALLIKKANDY
Más de Self-employed
Science of Happiness Self-employed
Online Training.pptxSelf-employed
Ergonomics for Innovators in Built Environment.pptxSelf-employed
Innovation in Construction-Case study.docxSelf-employed
Six words to avoidSelf-employed
What all remote workers need to know and do by Jayadeva de SilvaSelf-employed
Último
Lessons Learned About The Tension Between Product Manager And Engineering Whi...Francesco Corti
Hygeia Presentation - PhilippinesRVqCalamaya
MSA Website Slideshow (1).pdfHamzaKhan46086
Job Openings, Union Information, Community Assistance.pdfKristenNorvell
Gravyty Presentation for Bloomerang Year End Stewardship 9-26-23.pdfBloomerang
Online Giving Trends (3).pdfBloomerang
Evaluation of training
- 2. Evaluation of Training by Jayadeva de Silva Raman K. Attri ©
- 11. Kirkpatrick
- 20. 4-Tier Practical Training Value Measurement Model Training Expectation Measurement Trainee feedback scores on initial impression on to what extent training met their expectations of learning, skills and knowledge. Tool: Survey Form Student feedback Tier-1 Expectations
- 21. 4-Tier Practical Training Value Measurement Model Training Expectation Measurement Trainee feedback scores on initial impression on to what extent training met their expectations of learning, skills and knowledge. Tool: Survey Form Student feedback Tier-1 Expectations Pre-Training Vs Post-Training Assessment Tier-2 Improvement Training Improvement Measurement Assessment of trainee’s training exposure and expertise gained on same set of tasks before and after training. Includes comparison of in-training & Post-training test performance, If applicable. Tool: Pre-training and Post-training Survey Forms. Post-training performance tests .
- 22. 4-Tier Practical Training Value Measurement Model Training Expectation Measurement Trainee feedback scores on initial impression on to what extent training met their expectations of learning, skills and knowledge. Tool: Survey Form Training effectiveness Measurement Post-training normalized feedback scores and its quarterly trends. Feedback from trainee Manager on visible incremental changes in trainee skills, service parameters and on-job behavior. Tool: Quarterly Follow-on Survey from Managers Student feedback Tier-1 Expectations Post-Training On-Job Behavior Survey Tier-3 Effectiveness Pre-Training Vs Post-Training Assessment Tier-2 Improvement Training Improvement Measurement Assessment of trainee’s training exposure and expertise gained on same set of tasks before and after training. Includes comparison of in-training & Post-training test performance, If applicable. Tool: Pre-training and Post-training Survey Forms. Post-training performance tests .
- 23. 4-Tier Practical Training Value Measurement Model Training Expectation Measurement Trainee feedback scores on initial impression on to what extent training met their expectations of learning, skills and knowledge. Tool: Survey Form Training effectiveness Measurement Post-training normalized feedback scores and its quarterly trends. Feedback from trainee Manager on visible incremental changes in trainee skills, service parameters and on-job behavior. Tool: Quarterly Follow-on Survey from Managers Student feedback Tier-1 Expectations Post-Training On-Job Behavior Survey Tier-3 Effectiveness Improvement in business indicators, revenue figures or success parameters Tier-4 Impact Pre-Training Vs Post-Training Assessment Tier-2 Improvement Training Improvement Measurement Assessment of trainee’s training exposure and expertise gained on same set of tasks before and after training. Includes comparison of in-training & Post-training test performance, If applicable. Tool: Pre-training and Post-training Survey Forms. Post-training performance tests . Training Impact Measurement Impact of training for improving revenues, enhancing business or other success factors driving the training needs. Tool: Comparison of Baseline data and Quarterly business data, Impact Factor calculation sheets
- 27. FEEDBACK FORM Please take a few minutes to fill out this feedback form. Your feedback will help us strengthen the course delivery. Course Title - Name of the facilitator - You may provide feedback of the program on the following criteria by putting a ( ) mark in the space provided. 4 – Exceeds Expectation; 3 – Meets Expectation; 2 – Needs Improvement; 1 – Unsatisfactory 1. What did you like most in the workshop? 2. What did you dislike in the workshop? 3. What other changes would you suggest in case the same course is conducted in future? Learning & Development Human Resources Overall Evaluation Supporting Materials Relevance Examples, Cases, Simulation & Exercises Communication Presentation Style Subject Knowledge 1 2 3 4
- 65. Return on Impact (RoI) is a new approach which measures the difference training has created on those governing business/ service or revenue parameters which drives training needs.
Hinweis der Redaktion
- Formative evaluation is also useful in analyzing learning materials, student learning and achievements, and teacher effectiveness.... Formative evaluation is primarily a building process which accumulates a series of components of new materials, skills, and problems into an ultimate meaningful whole. - Wally Guyot (1978)
- If we refer to Kirkpatrick's four levels of evaluation, levels one and two (reactive and learning) are formative evaluations while levels three and four (performance and impact) are summative evaluations. The reactive evaluation is a tool to help determine if the objectives can be reached, the learning evaluation is a tool to help reach the objectives, the performance evaluation is a tool to see if the objectives have actually been met, while the impact evaluation is a tool to judge the value or worth of the objectives. Thus, there are four major break points. The various instruments used to collect the data are questionnaires, surveys, interviews, observations, and testing. The model or methodology used to gather the data should be a specified step-by-step procedure. It should be carefully designed and executed to ensure the data is accurate and valid.
- 01/19/12 1. Ask participants, bosses, testing, or ask others who are familiar with the needs or objectives. Some examples are surveys or interviews. 2. a. What are the results that you are trying to do? b. What behaviors do you want the participants to have at the end of the training program. c. What knowledge, skills, and/or attitudes do you want your pupils to demonstrate at the end of the training program. 3. Determine subject content to meet needs and objectives. 4. Four decisions: a. Who is the best suited to receive the training. b. Are the training programs required by law (affirmative action). c. Voluntary or required d. Should hourly and salary be included in the same class or be segregated. 5. Solid week or intermittent days. How often should breaks be taken. Should lunch be brought in or allow participants to leave for a hour.
- 01/19/12 6. Should be comfortable and convenient and appropriate. 7. a. In-house or outside contractors b. Do instructors need to be ‘tailored’ to the special needs in the training program. 8. Two purposes: a. Maintain interest b. Help communicate ideas and skill transfer. Both of these purposes can be accomplished by using single, special interest video cassettes or some type of packaged program. 9. Two scenarios: a. Frustration, and b. Needs of the instructor. 10. The determining effectiveness of a training program are planning and implementation.
- 01/19/12
- 01/19/12 The end results after an evaluation are hopefully positive results for both upper management and the program coordinators.
- 01/19/12 1. If and when downsizing occurs, this statement shall have more meaning than ever for some unlucky people. HRD departments are regarded by upper management as an overhead and not contributing directly to production.
- 01/19/12 2. Pilot courses may be implemented to see if the participants have the necessary knowledge, or skills, or behavioral changes to make the program work. 3. Kirkpatrick uses eight factors on how to improve the effectiveness of a training program. These eight factors closely follow the Ten Factors of Developing a Training Program. This is a feedback statement spinning off of the Ten Factors.
- 01/19/12 These are questions asked by HRD coordinators on training performance and the beginning criteria and the expectations of the resulting training program. Business training operations need quantitative measures as well as qualitative measures. A happy medium between these two criteria is an ideal position to fully understand the training needs and to fulfill its development. Quantitative - the research methodology where the investigator's “values, interpretations, feelings, and musings have no place in the positivist’s view of the scientific inquiry.” (Borg and Gall, 1989) cont.
- Awareness of the need and value of training to the organization. The necessity of involving the Training Manager (or equivalent) in senior management meetings where decisions are made about future changes when training will be essential. Knowledge of and support of training plans. Active participation in events. Requirement for evaluation to be performed and require regular summary report. Policy and strategic decisions based on results and ROI data. the trainer - training evaluation responsibilities Provision of any necessary pre-programme work etc and programme planning. Identification at the start of the programme of the knowledge and skills level of the trainees/learners. Provision of training and learning resources to enable the learners to learn within the objectives of the programme and the learners' own objectives. Monitoring the learning as the programme progresses. At the end of the programme, assessment of and receipt of reports from the learners of the learning levels achieved. Ensuring the production by the learners of an action plan to reinforce, practise and implement learning. the line manager - training evaluation responsibilities Work-needs and people identification. Involvement in training programme and evaluation development. Support of pre-event preparation and holding briefing meetings with the learner. Giving ongoing, and practical, support to the training programme. Holding a debriefing meeting with the learner on their return to work to discuss, agree or help to modify and agree action for their action plan. Reviewing the progress of learning implementation. Final review of implementation success and assessment, where possible, of the ROI . the training manager - training evaluation responsibilities Management of the training department and agreeing the training needs and the programme application Maintenance of interest and support in the planning and implementation of the programmes, including a practical involvement where required The introduction and maintenance of evaluation systems, and production of regular reports for senior management Frequent, relevant contact with senior management Liaison with the learners' line managers and arrangement of learning implementation responsibility learning programmes for the managers Liaison with line managers, where necessary, in the assessment of the training ROI . the trainee or learner - training evaluation responsibilities Involvement in the planning and design of the training programme where possible Involvement in the planning and design of the evaluation process where possible Obviously, to take interest and an active part in the training programme or activity. To complete a personal action plan during and at the end of the training for implementation on return to work, and to put this into practice, with support from the line manager. Take interest and support the evaluation processes. N.B. Although the principal role of the trainee in the programme is to learn, the learner must be involved in the evaluation process. This is essential, since without their comments much of the evaluation could not occur. Neither would the new knowledge and skills be implemented. For trainees to neglect either responsibility the business wastes its investment in training. Trainees will assist more readily if the process avoids the look and feel of a paper-chase or number-crunching exercise. Instead, make sure trainees understand the importance of their input - exactly what and why they are being asked to do.
- 01/19/12
- 01/19/12 With Reaction and Learning, evaluation should be immediate. But evaluating change in Behavior involves some decision-making.
- 01/19/12
- 01/19/12
- 01/19/12 All of these levels are important. However, in later examples of this model, you shall see where large corporations have taken the Kirkpatrick Model and used all of it, only part of it, and still some reversed the order of the levels.
- 01/19/12 The employee may - Like the new behavior and continue using it. Not like the new behavior and return to doing things the “old way”. Like the change, but be restrained by outside forces that prevent his continuing to use it.
- 01/19/12 The employee must want to make the change. The training must provide the what and the how . The employee must return to a work environment that allows and/or encourages the change. There should be rewards - Intrinsic - inner feelings of price and achievement. Extrinsic - such as pay increases or praise.
- 01/19/12 If you have questions, concerns, or information you would like to share concerning the content of this presentation: Email Professor Pershing – pershin@indiana.edu FAX Professor Pershing – 812.339.8792 Submit notes for discussion section Call Professor Pershing – 812.339.3226 END