SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 22
Download to read offline
OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (COMPTROLLER) / CFO

March 2014

FISCAL YEAR 2015

BUDGET REQUEST

0
Strategy
• 2014 QDR being submitted with budget
• 2014 QDR updates strategy, focusing on:
– Defending homeland against all strategic threats
– Build security globally by projecting U.S. influence and deterring
aggressors
– Project power and win decisively
• 2014 QDR embodies key elements of January 2012 defense strategy
– Rebalance to Asia-Pacific
– Sustaining commitments to key allies in Middle East
– Aggressively pursue global terrorist network
– Emphasis on key threat areas (e.g., cyber, special ops)
– No longer size forces for large, prolonged stability operations
– Others
1
Budget Totals in President’s FY 2015 Budget Request
DoD Topline, FY 2001 – FY 2019
(Current Dollars in Billions)

$750
666
3

$500
316

438
73

345

468

479

91

76

8
3

187

146

287

687
645

479

513

162

159

614*
581
115 578
85
82

528

528

530

166

575
*
79

565
30*

574
30 *

581
30*

589
30*

496

535

544

551

559

116

17

6
23

$250

1
7

601
535

691

666

33

328

365

377

400

411

432

496

496

$0
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19
Base Budget

OCO

Other

* Reflects FY13 Enacted level excluding Sequestration
* Placeholders only

Focus Only On Base Budget For Remainder Of Briefing
No FY 2015 OCO Budget Yet
2
PB15 DoD Base-Budget Topline
($B)

600

575

FY 2014 President’s Budget (PB14)

577

559
551

550
541
535
537

PB15

525

500
496

500

Sequester - Level Budgets

475
FY14

FY15
PB14

FY16

FY17

Sequester - Level Budgets

FY18

FY19

PB15
3
What FY 2015 President’s Budget
Seeks to Accomplish
• Seek a balanced force
– Balance readiness, capability, and capacity

• Prepare for prolonged readiness challenges
– Recover from sequestration
– Meet today’s demands
– Prepare to surge for contingencies

• Continue to focus on institutional reform
– Headquarters reduction, others

• Pursue compensation changes
• Pursue investments in emerging military capabilities
• Reduce infrastructure

4
Achieve Efficiencies
• PB15 five-year efficiency savings total about $94B
• Key initiatives
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

20% cut in headquarters operating budgets
Reduction in contractor funding
Civilian manpower restructuring
Health care cost savings
Terminating/deferring weapons programs and military construction projects
BRAC round in 2017 (long-term savings)
Better Buying Power
Auditable financial statements

• These are in addition to past plans
that are being implemented
– FY 2012: $150B in FY12 – FY16
– FY 2013: $ 60B in FY13 – FY17
– FY 2014: $ 35B in FY14 – FY18
5
Slow Growth in Military Compensation
• Principles we followed
– No one’s pay and allowances are cut
– Fully support All-Volunteer Force
• Compensation sufficient to recruit and retain needed personnel
– Use savings to pay for training and maintenance

• Major initiatives
– Basic pay raise limited to 1% in FY 2015, also limits beyond
• Exception: General Officer/Flag Officer pay frozen in FY 2015
– Slow growth in Basic Allowance for Housing until out of pocket averages 5%
• Eliminate renters insurance from Basic Allowance for Housing rates
– Reduce commissary subsidy by $1 billion over three years
• No direction to close commissaries
– Consolidate TRICARE healthcare plans with altered deductible/co-pays
– Resubmit previous TRICARE-For-Life and pharmacy proposals
• But not previous TRICARE Prime fee increases

6
Modernization: Targeted and Streamlined
• Cyber fully funded ($5.1B)
• 34 JSF and continued RDT&E ($8B)
– 343 in FY15 – FY19
• 7 Ships ($14.4B) including 2 subs,
2 destroyers, 3 LCS
– 44 ships in FY15 – FY19
• 8 P-8 Aircraft ($2.1B)
– 56 P-8s in FY15 – FY19
• Ballistic Missile Defense development ($8.5B)
• Long Range Strike Bomber ($0.9B) / Ohio replacement submarine
development ($1.1B)
• Investment in Helicopters ($8.4B) / Mobility Aircraft ($2.4B for KC-46) /
New Aircraft Engine
• Cancel Ground Combat Vehicle (new plan by year’s end)
• Delay Combat Rescue Helicopter
• Consider alternatives to Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program
7
Gradually Restore Ready Force
O&M Grows 3.1%/yr

• Recover from sequestration impact and the past decade of high deployment
• Work to establish new readiness posture for the post-Afghanistan period
• Army: Contingency Response Force regionally aligned, forward deployed,
trained for decisive action
• USMC: Crisis response, forward deployed, full spectrum combat capability,
reconstitute in stride
• Navy: Operate forward, maintain global at-sea presence
• Air Force: Begin to restore full range of operations
• USSOCOM: Maintain full spectrum, global capabilities and regional
expertise
• Cyber Operations: Continue to grow and train cyber mission force
8
Reduce Numbers of Personnel
Planned
End FY 2014

Active end
strength

Planned
End FY 2015

Goals w/o
Sequester
End FY 2019

∆%
FY19/FY14

1,345K

1,309K

1,264K

-6%

Guard/Reserve end
strength

831K

821K

798K

-4%

Civilian full-time
equivalents

791K

782K

751K

-5%

9
Selected Force Structure Changes
(Without Sequester)

• Air Force aircraft at 4,814 in FY 2019 (5,194 in FY 2014)
– Retire A-10s
– Retire U-2s

• Predators/Reapers levels at 55 CAPs in FY 2019
• Navy ships at 309 in FY 2019 (288 in FY 2014)
– 11 cruisers in long-term
phased modernization

• Army BCTs and aviation
brigades reduced

10
Goals For Forces and End Strength

End FY 2014

Goal w/o
Sequester
FY 2019

Sequester
FY 2019

Army active end strength

510K

440-450K

420K*

Army Guard end strength

354K

335K

315K*

Army Reserve end strength

202K

195K

185K*

Marines active end strength

189K

182K

175K*

10

11

10*

Carriers

*Level of end strength shown in PB15 FYDP

11
FY 2015 President’s Budget
(Dollars in Billions)

Base Budget
Military Construction
Family Housing $6.6

RDT&E
$63.5

Others $1.2

Military
Personnel
$135.2

Budget By Military Department

Army
$120.3

Defense
Wide
$89.8

Procurement
$90.4
Operation &
Maintenance
$198.7

Navy
$147.7

Air
Force
$137.8

Budget Request: $495.6 Billion
12
PB15 DoD Base-Budget Topline
(Opportunity, Growth, and Security Initiative)
($B)

600

575

FY 2014 President’s Budget (PB14)

550
541

PB15

525

$26B
Initiative
500

Sequester - Level Budgets

496

475
FY14

FY15
PB14

FY16

FY17

Sequester - Level Budgets

FY18

FY19

PB15
13
FY 2015 Opportunity, Growth, and Security Initiative
• Total $26 billion for DoD
• Readiness enhancements
– Training adds in Army
– Spares and logistics in Navy
– Unit training in USMC
– Training in Air Force
• Investment increases
– Army Helicopters (56)
– Navy P-8 (8), E-2D Aircraft (1)
– USMC Light Armored Vehicle
– Air Force F-35 (2), C-130J (10),
MQ-9 Aircraft (12)
– Science and Technology ($335M)
• Installation support increases
– All Services increase base sustainment
– All Services add MilCon funding
14
PB15 DoD Base-Budget Topline
(Effects Of Sequester-Level Budgets)
($B)

600

575

FY 2014 President’s Budget (PB14)

550

PB15

$115B Cut

525

500

Sequester - Level Budgets
475
FY14

FY15
PB14

FY16

FY17

Sequester - Level Budgets

FY18

FY19

PB15
15
Reduced Capability At Sequester-Level Budgets
Topline down $115B in FY 2015 – FY 2019

• End-strength cuts deeper than pre-sequester goals
• Carriers and wings reduced below pre-sequester goals
• Same proposed changes in military compensation
• More force cuts (e.g., KC-10, Global Hawk Block 40,Predators/Reapers)
• Less recovery in readiness (O&M up 1.9%/yr, 3.1%/yr in budget)
• Less growth in procurement
– 326 JSF (343 in PB15 FYDP)
– 36 Ships (44 in PB15 FYDP)
• RDT&E declines -1.3%/yr (grows 1.6%
in PB15 FYDP)
• No recovery in facilities funding
16
Summary
• President’s Budget requests $496 billion
in FY 2015, rising to $559 billion in
FY 2019
– Near term gaps in training and
maintenance diminish readiness
• Opportunity, Growth, and Security
Initiative would mitigate
– Longer term: risk due to deferred
modernization and smaller U.S. force
– PB force can fulfill strategy but with
some added risk
• Sequester-level budgets
– Risk grows significantly
17
For More Information
• For more information, visit the website for the Office of the Under
Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) at:
– www.budget.mil
– Download the Department’s FY 2015 Budget Request

18
Back Up

19
Focus on FY 2015 Base Budget
(Dollars in Billions)
FY 2013
Enacted
w/Sequester

FY 2014
Enacted

Military Personnel

135.4

135.9

135.2

Operation and Maintenance

194.0

192.8

198.7

91.1

92.4

90.4

63.3

62.8

63.5

Military Construction

8.1

8.4

5.4

Family Housing

1.5

1.4

1.2

Revolving Funds

2.2

2.2

1.2

495.5

496.0

495.6

Procurement
Research, Development, Test

FY 2015
PB Request

and Evaluation

Total
Numbers may not add due to rounding

20
Shifts in Base Budget
(Dollars in Billions)
BY COMPONENT

FY 2014
Enacted

FY 2015
PB Request

∆%
FY15/FY14 Req

Army

121.7

120.3

-1%

Navy

147.3

147.7

--

Air Force

134.7

137.8

+2%

92.3

89.8

-3%

496.0

495.6

--

Defense-Wide
Total

BY TITLE

FY 2014
Enacted

FY 2015
PB Request

∆%
FY15/FY14 Req

Military Personnel

135.9

135.2

--

Operation and Maintenance

192.8

198.7

+3%

92.4

90.4

-2%

62.8

63.5

+1%

Military Construction

8.4

5.4

-36%

Family Housing

1.4

1.2

-16%

Revolving Funds

2.2

1.2

-44%

496.0

495.6

--

Procurement
Research, Development, Test
and Evaluation

Total
Numbers may not add due to rounding

21

More Related Content

Similar to Fiscal Year 2015: Budget Request

University of Denver Case Study - Deferred Maintenance Can Be Managed
University of Denver Case Study - Deferred Maintenance Can Be ManagedUniversity of Denver Case Study - Deferred Maintenance Can Be Managed
University of Denver Case Study - Deferred Maintenance Can Be Managed
Sightlines
 
FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014
FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014
FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014
Tom "Blad" Lindblad
 
Force Modernization LPD
Force Modernization LPDForce Modernization LPD
Force Modernization LPD
KEI COOPER
 
Trc q1 2014 earnings slides final
Trc q1 2014 earnings slides finalTrc q1 2014 earnings slides final
Trc q1 2014 earnings slides final
trcsolutions
 

Similar to Fiscal Year 2015: Budget Request (20)

CGCC May 5 budget committee
CGCC May 5 budget committee CGCC May 5 budget committee
CGCC May 5 budget committee
 
PPBE tutorial Nov 2013
PPBE tutorial Nov 2013PPBE tutorial Nov 2013
PPBE tutorial Nov 2013
 
University of Denver Case Study - Deferred Maintenance Can Be Managed
University of Denver Case Study - Deferred Maintenance Can Be ManagedUniversity of Denver Case Study - Deferred Maintenance Can Be Managed
University of Denver Case Study - Deferred Maintenance Can Be Managed
 
Stifel 2015 Transportation and Logistics Conference
Stifel 2015 Transportation and Logistics ConferenceStifel 2015 Transportation and Logistics Conference
Stifel 2015 Transportation and Logistics Conference
 
Effective Budget Management, Singapore
Effective Budget Management, SingaporeEffective Budget Management, Singapore
Effective Budget Management, Singapore
 
Antero Resources Company Overview Presentation - August 2014
Antero Resources Company Overview Presentation - August 2014Antero Resources Company Overview Presentation - August 2014
Antero Resources Company Overview Presentation - August 2014
 
April Forum Powerpoint
April Forum PowerpointApril Forum Powerpoint
April Forum Powerpoint
 
Capital Power April Investor Presentation
Capital Power April Investor PresentationCapital Power April Investor Presentation
Capital Power April Investor Presentation
 
FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014
FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014
FY2015 DoD Budget Request Overview March 4 2014
 
Condensed fs2014 may
Condensed fs2014 mayCondensed fs2014 may
Condensed fs2014 may
 
Johnathan hood-en-investment-planning
Johnathan hood-en-investment-planningJohnathan hood-en-investment-planning
Johnathan hood-en-investment-planning
 
Force Modernization LPD
Force Modernization LPDForce Modernization LPD
Force Modernization LPD
 
Trc q1 2014 earnings slides final
Trc q1 2014 earnings slides finalTrc q1 2014 earnings slides final
Trc q1 2014 earnings slides final
 
Tripping over a dollar to save a dime tips to refining your budget process
Tripping over a dollar to save a dime   tips to refining your budget processTripping over a dollar to save a dime   tips to refining your budget process
Tripping over a dollar to save a dime tips to refining your budget process
 
Medium-term Perspectives on Fiscal Policy and Budgeting by Peter Thurlow
Medium-term Perspectives on Fiscal Policy and Budgeting by Peter Thurlow Medium-term Perspectives on Fiscal Policy and Budgeting by Peter Thurlow
Medium-term Perspectives on Fiscal Policy and Budgeting by Peter Thurlow
 
Financial Statement October 2015
Financial Statement October 2015Financial Statement October 2015
Financial Statement October 2015
 
Ffc briefing on 2015 appropriations bill 12_may2015
Ffc briefing on 2015 appropriations bill 12_may2015Ffc briefing on 2015 appropriations bill 12_may2015
Ffc briefing on 2015 appropriations bill 12_may2015
 
City of Reno FY 2016 Budget
City of Reno FY 2016 BudgetCity of Reno FY 2016 Budget
City of Reno FY 2016 Budget
 
Truth in taxation: June 2014
Truth in taxation: June 2014Truth in taxation: June 2014
Truth in taxation: June 2014
 
Condensed fs2014 june
Condensed fs2014 juneCondensed fs2014 june
Condensed fs2014 june
 

More from atlanticcouncil

Cyber912 student challenge_two_pager_general
Cyber912 student challenge_two_pager_generalCyber912 student challenge_two_pager_general
Cyber912 student challenge_two_pager_general
atlanticcouncil
 
Tunisia: The Last Arab Spring Country
Tunisia: The Last Arab Spring CountryTunisia: The Last Arab Spring Country
Tunisia: The Last Arab Spring Country
atlanticcouncil
 
Yp day-2015-report-webversion
Yp day-2015-report-webversionYp day-2015-report-webversion
Yp day-2015-report-webversion
atlanticcouncil
 
Defeating the Jihadists in Syria: Competition before Confrontation
Defeating the Jihadists in Syria: Competition before ConfrontationDefeating the Jihadists in Syria: Competition before Confrontation
Defeating the Jihadists in Syria: Competition before Confrontation
atlanticcouncil
 
Gulf innovation web
Gulf innovation webGulf innovation web
Gulf innovation web
atlanticcouncil
 

More from atlanticcouncil (20)

Securing Ukraine's Energy Sector
Securing Ukraine's Energy SectorSecuring Ukraine's Energy Sector
Securing Ukraine's Energy Sector
 
Cyber912 student challenge_two_pager_general
Cyber912 student challenge_two_pager_generalCyber912 student challenge_two_pager_general
Cyber912 student challenge_two_pager_general
 
Cyber912 student challenge_two_pager_sponsors
Cyber912 student challenge_two_pager_sponsorsCyber912 student challenge_two_pager_sponsors
Cyber912 student challenge_two_pager_sponsors
 
Afghanistan and US Security
Afghanistan and US SecurityAfghanistan and US Security
Afghanistan and US Security
 
Crude Oil for Natural Gas: Prospects for Iran-Saudi Reconciliation
Crude Oil for Natural Gas: Prospects for Iran-Saudi ReconciliationCrude Oil for Natural Gas: Prospects for Iran-Saudi Reconciliation
Crude Oil for Natural Gas: Prospects for Iran-Saudi Reconciliation
 
Tunisia: The Last Arab Spring Country
Tunisia: The Last Arab Spring CountryTunisia: The Last Arab Spring Country
Tunisia: The Last Arab Spring Country
 
Foreign Policy for an Urban World: Global Governance and the Rise of Cities
Foreign Policy for an Urban World: Global Governance and the Rise of CitiesForeign Policy for an Urban World: Global Governance and the Rise of Cities
Foreign Policy for an Urban World: Global Governance and the Rise of Cities
 
Cyber 9/12 Student Challenge General Information
Cyber 9/12 Student Challenge General InformationCyber 9/12 Student Challenge General Information
Cyber 9/12 Student Challenge General Information
 
Toward a Sustainable Peace in the South China Sea
Toward a Sustainable Peace in the South China SeaToward a Sustainable Peace in the South China Sea
Toward a Sustainable Peace in the South China Sea
 
Relaunching the eastern_partnership_web
Relaunching the eastern_partnership_webRelaunching the eastern_partnership_web
Relaunching the eastern_partnership_web
 
2015 Distinguished Leadership Awards
2015 Distinguished Leadership Awards2015 Distinguished Leadership Awards
2015 Distinguished Leadership Awards
 
Camp david 0508
Camp david 0508Camp david 0508
Camp david 0508
 
Harnessing social impact
Harnessing social impactHarnessing social impact
Harnessing social impact
 
Reimagining pakistan s_militia_policy
Reimagining pakistan s_militia_policyReimagining pakistan s_militia_policy
Reimagining pakistan s_militia_policy
 
Yp day-2015-report-webversion
Yp day-2015-report-webversionYp day-2015-report-webversion
Yp day-2015-report-webversion
 
Defeating the Jihadists in Syria: Competition before Confrontation
Defeating the Jihadists in Syria: Competition before ConfrontationDefeating the Jihadists in Syria: Competition before Confrontation
Defeating the Jihadists in Syria: Competition before Confrontation
 
Dynamic Stability: US Strategy for a World in Transition
Dynamic Stability: US Strategy for a World in TransitionDynamic Stability: US Strategy for a World in Transition
Dynamic Stability: US Strategy for a World in Transition
 
Setting the Stage for Peace in Syria: The Case for a Syrian National Stabiliz...
Setting the Stage for Peace in Syria: The Case for a Syrian National Stabiliz...Setting the Stage for Peace in Syria: The Case for a Syrian National Stabiliz...
Setting the Stage for Peace in Syria: The Case for a Syrian National Stabiliz...
 
Mexicos energy reform
Mexicos energy reformMexicos energy reform
Mexicos energy reform
 
Gulf innovation web
Gulf innovation webGulf innovation web
Gulf innovation web
 

Fiscal Year 2015: Budget Request

  • 1. OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (COMPTROLLER) / CFO March 2014 FISCAL YEAR 2015 BUDGET REQUEST 0
  • 2. Strategy • 2014 QDR being submitted with budget • 2014 QDR updates strategy, focusing on: – Defending homeland against all strategic threats – Build security globally by projecting U.S. influence and deterring aggressors – Project power and win decisively • 2014 QDR embodies key elements of January 2012 defense strategy – Rebalance to Asia-Pacific – Sustaining commitments to key allies in Middle East – Aggressively pursue global terrorist network – Emphasis on key threat areas (e.g., cyber, special ops) – No longer size forces for large, prolonged stability operations – Others 1
  • 3. Budget Totals in President’s FY 2015 Budget Request DoD Topline, FY 2001 – FY 2019 (Current Dollars in Billions) $750 666 3 $500 316 438 73 345 468 479 91 76 8 3 187 146 287 687 645 479 513 162 159 614* 581 115 578 85 82 528 528 530 166 575 * 79 565 30* 574 30 * 581 30* 589 30* 496 535 544 551 559 116 17 6 23 $250 1 7 601 535 691 666 33 328 365 377 400 411 432 496 496 $0 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 Base Budget OCO Other * Reflects FY13 Enacted level excluding Sequestration * Placeholders only Focus Only On Base Budget For Remainder Of Briefing No FY 2015 OCO Budget Yet 2
  • 4. PB15 DoD Base-Budget Topline ($B) 600 575 FY 2014 President’s Budget (PB14) 577 559 551 550 541 535 537 PB15 525 500 496 500 Sequester - Level Budgets 475 FY14 FY15 PB14 FY16 FY17 Sequester - Level Budgets FY18 FY19 PB15 3
  • 5. What FY 2015 President’s Budget Seeks to Accomplish • Seek a balanced force – Balance readiness, capability, and capacity • Prepare for prolonged readiness challenges – Recover from sequestration – Meet today’s demands – Prepare to surge for contingencies • Continue to focus on institutional reform – Headquarters reduction, others • Pursue compensation changes • Pursue investments in emerging military capabilities • Reduce infrastructure 4
  • 6. Achieve Efficiencies • PB15 five-year efficiency savings total about $94B • Key initiatives – – – – – – – – 20% cut in headquarters operating budgets Reduction in contractor funding Civilian manpower restructuring Health care cost savings Terminating/deferring weapons programs and military construction projects BRAC round in 2017 (long-term savings) Better Buying Power Auditable financial statements • These are in addition to past plans that are being implemented – FY 2012: $150B in FY12 – FY16 – FY 2013: $ 60B in FY13 – FY17 – FY 2014: $ 35B in FY14 – FY18 5
  • 7. Slow Growth in Military Compensation • Principles we followed – No one’s pay and allowances are cut – Fully support All-Volunteer Force • Compensation sufficient to recruit and retain needed personnel – Use savings to pay for training and maintenance • Major initiatives – Basic pay raise limited to 1% in FY 2015, also limits beyond • Exception: General Officer/Flag Officer pay frozen in FY 2015 – Slow growth in Basic Allowance for Housing until out of pocket averages 5% • Eliminate renters insurance from Basic Allowance for Housing rates – Reduce commissary subsidy by $1 billion over three years • No direction to close commissaries – Consolidate TRICARE healthcare plans with altered deductible/co-pays – Resubmit previous TRICARE-For-Life and pharmacy proposals • But not previous TRICARE Prime fee increases 6
  • 8. Modernization: Targeted and Streamlined • Cyber fully funded ($5.1B) • 34 JSF and continued RDT&E ($8B) – 343 in FY15 – FY19 • 7 Ships ($14.4B) including 2 subs, 2 destroyers, 3 LCS – 44 ships in FY15 – FY19 • 8 P-8 Aircraft ($2.1B) – 56 P-8s in FY15 – FY19 • Ballistic Missile Defense development ($8.5B) • Long Range Strike Bomber ($0.9B) / Ohio replacement submarine development ($1.1B) • Investment in Helicopters ($8.4B) / Mobility Aircraft ($2.4B for KC-46) / New Aircraft Engine • Cancel Ground Combat Vehicle (new plan by year’s end) • Delay Combat Rescue Helicopter • Consider alternatives to Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program 7
  • 9. Gradually Restore Ready Force O&M Grows 3.1%/yr • Recover from sequestration impact and the past decade of high deployment • Work to establish new readiness posture for the post-Afghanistan period • Army: Contingency Response Force regionally aligned, forward deployed, trained for decisive action • USMC: Crisis response, forward deployed, full spectrum combat capability, reconstitute in stride • Navy: Operate forward, maintain global at-sea presence • Air Force: Begin to restore full range of operations • USSOCOM: Maintain full spectrum, global capabilities and regional expertise • Cyber Operations: Continue to grow and train cyber mission force 8
  • 10. Reduce Numbers of Personnel Planned End FY 2014 Active end strength Planned End FY 2015 Goals w/o Sequester End FY 2019 ∆% FY19/FY14 1,345K 1,309K 1,264K -6% Guard/Reserve end strength 831K 821K 798K -4% Civilian full-time equivalents 791K 782K 751K -5% 9
  • 11. Selected Force Structure Changes (Without Sequester) • Air Force aircraft at 4,814 in FY 2019 (5,194 in FY 2014) – Retire A-10s – Retire U-2s • Predators/Reapers levels at 55 CAPs in FY 2019 • Navy ships at 309 in FY 2019 (288 in FY 2014) – 11 cruisers in long-term phased modernization • Army BCTs and aviation brigades reduced 10
  • 12. Goals For Forces and End Strength End FY 2014 Goal w/o Sequester FY 2019 Sequester FY 2019 Army active end strength 510K 440-450K 420K* Army Guard end strength 354K 335K 315K* Army Reserve end strength 202K 195K 185K* Marines active end strength 189K 182K 175K* 10 11 10* Carriers *Level of end strength shown in PB15 FYDP 11
  • 13. FY 2015 President’s Budget (Dollars in Billions) Base Budget Military Construction Family Housing $6.6 RDT&E $63.5 Others $1.2 Military Personnel $135.2 Budget By Military Department Army $120.3 Defense Wide $89.8 Procurement $90.4 Operation & Maintenance $198.7 Navy $147.7 Air Force $137.8 Budget Request: $495.6 Billion 12
  • 14. PB15 DoD Base-Budget Topline (Opportunity, Growth, and Security Initiative) ($B) 600 575 FY 2014 President’s Budget (PB14) 550 541 PB15 525 $26B Initiative 500 Sequester - Level Budgets 496 475 FY14 FY15 PB14 FY16 FY17 Sequester - Level Budgets FY18 FY19 PB15 13
  • 15. FY 2015 Opportunity, Growth, and Security Initiative • Total $26 billion for DoD • Readiness enhancements – Training adds in Army – Spares and logistics in Navy – Unit training in USMC – Training in Air Force • Investment increases – Army Helicopters (56) – Navy P-8 (8), E-2D Aircraft (1) – USMC Light Armored Vehicle – Air Force F-35 (2), C-130J (10), MQ-9 Aircraft (12) – Science and Technology ($335M) • Installation support increases – All Services increase base sustainment – All Services add MilCon funding 14
  • 16. PB15 DoD Base-Budget Topline (Effects Of Sequester-Level Budgets) ($B) 600 575 FY 2014 President’s Budget (PB14) 550 PB15 $115B Cut 525 500 Sequester - Level Budgets 475 FY14 FY15 PB14 FY16 FY17 Sequester - Level Budgets FY18 FY19 PB15 15
  • 17. Reduced Capability At Sequester-Level Budgets Topline down $115B in FY 2015 – FY 2019 • End-strength cuts deeper than pre-sequester goals • Carriers and wings reduced below pre-sequester goals • Same proposed changes in military compensation • More force cuts (e.g., KC-10, Global Hawk Block 40,Predators/Reapers) • Less recovery in readiness (O&M up 1.9%/yr, 3.1%/yr in budget) • Less growth in procurement – 326 JSF (343 in PB15 FYDP) – 36 Ships (44 in PB15 FYDP) • RDT&E declines -1.3%/yr (grows 1.6% in PB15 FYDP) • No recovery in facilities funding 16
  • 18. Summary • President’s Budget requests $496 billion in FY 2015, rising to $559 billion in FY 2019 – Near term gaps in training and maintenance diminish readiness • Opportunity, Growth, and Security Initiative would mitigate – Longer term: risk due to deferred modernization and smaller U.S. force – PB force can fulfill strategy but with some added risk • Sequester-level budgets – Risk grows significantly 17
  • 19. For More Information • For more information, visit the website for the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) at: – www.budget.mil – Download the Department’s FY 2015 Budget Request 18
  • 21. Focus on FY 2015 Base Budget (Dollars in Billions) FY 2013 Enacted w/Sequester FY 2014 Enacted Military Personnel 135.4 135.9 135.2 Operation and Maintenance 194.0 192.8 198.7 91.1 92.4 90.4 63.3 62.8 63.5 Military Construction 8.1 8.4 5.4 Family Housing 1.5 1.4 1.2 Revolving Funds 2.2 2.2 1.2 495.5 496.0 495.6 Procurement Research, Development, Test FY 2015 PB Request and Evaluation Total Numbers may not add due to rounding 20
  • 22. Shifts in Base Budget (Dollars in Billions) BY COMPONENT FY 2014 Enacted FY 2015 PB Request ∆% FY15/FY14 Req Army 121.7 120.3 -1% Navy 147.3 147.7 -- Air Force 134.7 137.8 +2% 92.3 89.8 -3% 496.0 495.6 -- Defense-Wide Total BY TITLE FY 2014 Enacted FY 2015 PB Request ∆% FY15/FY14 Req Military Personnel 135.9 135.2 -- Operation and Maintenance 192.8 198.7 +3% 92.4 90.4 -2% 62.8 63.5 +1% Military Construction 8.4 5.4 -36% Family Housing 1.4 1.2 -16% Revolving Funds 2.2 1.2 -44% 496.0 495.6 -- Procurement Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Total Numbers may not add due to rounding 21