RWT exercise 6 List each piece of criteria you’re using for your evaluation, and then list 2 links to sources that might agree with your angle of evaluation on them. Please also write a one-sentence description of the source and its main point, in your own words. Due in hardcopy May 18. Subject you’re evaluating: _________________________________________ 1st piece of criteria: Source: Source: 2nd piece of criteria: Source: Source: 3rd piece of criteria: Source: Source: 4th? RWT exercise 7 Please do a little background internet research in class on logical or thoughtful general positions that differ from your basic stance on your evaluation. Then, in your own words, please write 3-4 sentences per criterion from your paper that explain how/why others disagree or might disagree, based upon their own logic. Please be objective and not sarcastic. Due in hardcopy May 18. Evaluation Argument A B C D Very strong Strong Average Somewhat Weak Weak Introduction: has a hook and is engaging? Sets up context? Evaluation is of something specific, not a broad issue or category? Target audience awareness Clear and direct qualitative thesis statement near the beginning? Clear and focused criteria near the beginning? Structure/organization, focus/clarity: stays on topic and follows criteria? Support/explanation: avoids summary? Depth and specific examples and details? Logical? Quotations sandwiched appropriately and cited properly using MLA format? Individual thinking is evident? Doesn’t rely on sources too much? Voice/tone: distinctive? Engaging? Consistent? Appropriate for audience? Counterarguments: considers other viewpoints and handles them appropriately? Conclusion: engaging? Wraps things up clearly? Mechanics (grammar, punctuation, sentence structure, etc.) are sound? Works cited pages is done correctly? Estimated Grade: RWT exercise 5 (x2—double credit, 8 points) Due at the beginning of class Tuesday, May 17, in hardcopy. Now, please write a “discovery draft”of your paper here, entirely in your own words, without consulting any sources. In other words, after writing an intro (see video posted today) that includes your stance and criteria, plug your topic into each criterion (you should have 3-4) and go through the process of explaining how it fits each one. This is your chance to explain your opinion. Be specific, give examples, and go into as much detail as you can without sources. Per criterion, let’s shoot for 150 words, so this exercise should be 450-600 words. Remember, this is effort based, only. For example, if I am evaluating Chipotle as a restaurant with a target audience of families with kids, and one of my criterion is “atmosphere,” I would write in detail about the noise, the seating, safety, and other things, showing my readers specific examples, details, etc. And if I am evaluating a horror film like House of.

1. RWT exercise 6
List each piece of criteria you’re using for your evaluation, and
then list 2 links to sources that might agree with your angle of
evaluation on them. Please also write a one-sentence description
of the source and its main point, in your own words. Due in
hardcopy May 18.
Subject you’re evaluating:
_________________________________________
1st piece of criteria:
Source:
Source:
2nd piece of criteria:
Source:
Source:
3rd piece of criteria:
Source:
Source:
4th?
RWT exercise 7
Please do a little background internet research in class on
logical or thoughtful general positions that differ from your
basic stance on your evaluation.

2. Then, in your own words, please write 3-4 sentences per
criterion from your paper that explain how/why others disagree
or might disagree, based upon their own logic. Please be
objective and not sarcastic.
Due in hardcopy May 18.
Evaluation Argument
A B C
D
Very strong
Strong
Average
Somewhat Weak
Weak
Introduction: has a hook and is engaging? Sets up context?
Evaluation is of something specific, not a broad issue or
category?
Target audience awareness

3. Clear and direct qualitative thesis statement near the beginning?
Clear and focused criteria near the beginning?
Structure/organization, focus/clarity: stays on topic and follows
criteria?
Support/explanation: avoids summary? Depth and specific
examples and details? Logical? Quotations sandwiched
appropriately and cited properly using MLA format? Individual
thinking is evident? Doesn’t rely on sources too much?
Voice/tone: distinctive? Engaging? Consistent? Appropriate for
audience?

4. Counterarguments: considers other viewpoints and handles them
appropriately?
Conclusion: engaging? Wraps things up clearly?
Mechanics (grammar, punctuation, sentence structure, etc.) are
sound? Works cited pages is done correctly?
Estimated Grade:
RWT exercise 5 (x2—double credit, 8 points)
Due at the beginning of class Tuesday, May 17, in hardcopy.
Now, please write a “discovery draft”of your paper here,
entirely in your own words, without consulting any sources. In
other words, after writing an intro (see video posted today) that
includes your stance and criteria, plug your topic into each
criterion (you should have 3-4) and go through the process of
explaining how it fits each one. This is your chance to explain
your opinion. Be specific, give examples, and go into as much
detail as you can without sources. Per criterion, let’s shoot for
150 words, so this exercise should be 450-600 words.
Remember, this is effort based, only.
For example, if I am evaluating Chipotle as a restaurant with a

5. target audience of families with kids, and one of my criterion is
“atmosphere,” I would write in detail about the noise, the
seating, safety, and other things, showing my readers specific
examples, details, etc.
And if I am evaluating a horror film like House of 1000 Corpses
as potential “Oscar-worthy art,” and one criterion is that it
“represents the true depths of human evil,” I will explain and
then show examples of how it represents this beyond any
sensationalism.
You do not have to write a conclusion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDUPpKDQZIE
RWT exercise 3 (x2—double credit, 8 points)
Due at the beginning of class Tuesday, May 17, in hardcopy.
Now, please write a “discovery draft”of your paper here,
entirely in your own words, without consulting any sources. In
other words, after writing an intro (see video posted today) that
includes your stance and criteria, plug your topic into each
criterion (you should have 3-4) and go through the process of
explaining how it fits each one. This is your chance to explain
your opinion. Be specific, give examples, and go into as much
detail as you can without sources. Per criterion, let’s shoot for
150 words, so this exercise should be 450-600 words.
Remember, this is effort based, only.
For example, if I am evaluating Chipotle as a restaurant with a
target audience of families with kids, and one of my criterion is
“atmosphere,” I would write in detail about the noise, the
seating, safety, and other things, showing my readers specific
examples, details, etc.
And if I am evaluating a horror film like House of 1000 Corpses
as potential “Oscar-worthy art,” and one criterion is that it
“represents the true depths of human evil,” I will explain and
then show examples of how it represents this beyond any
sensationalism.

6. You do not have to write a conclusion.
RWT exercise 2 Due May 16 in
hardcopy.
Please complete the following:
(1) What is your (qualitative) working thesis statement for the
topic you want to evaluate?
(2) Who is your target audience for this evaluation, and in what
ways might this audience potentially disagree with your stance?
Who else would disagree with your stance (or provide
counterarguments for it)? Why and how? Be specific.
(3) What 3-4 pieces of criteria will you use to evaluate this
topic? Why is each appropriate for your target audience?
Explain in a sentence or two for each.
RWT exercise 1
Please list, along with a one-sentence explanation of each, six
possible pieces of specific criteria you could use to
evaluateeach of two topics that you most want to use (twelve

7. total pieces, in other words—six for each).
Then, answer this question for each topic: would your
evaluation be mostly positive or negative?
Finally, for each topic, list out several different potential target
audiences based upon your answer to the last question.
Remember, there is no argument if your target audience would
already agree with you for the most part.
Due in hardcopy at the beginning of class May 16.
Organization Leadership Major (students)
It is important as employee to have the leadership skills because
that will lead you for success of failure for your business.
· Is it worth it
· What can you do with it?
· Why it’s important?
· Job opportunity (needed by society)
· What should you expect with this degree?
· Work environment
MacBook (college students)
Choosing the right brand will help you protecting your files.
Saving your money.
· The speed performance of the device is fast even with heavy
programs.
· The battery performance is up to 10 hours which enough for
most people for ond day usage.

8. · The price of the device meant to be affordable for college
students with an excellent performance
· Apple use system operation which is IOS makes spying on
your device is impossible even by governments
· your sensitive information and file are protected from viruses
or hacked by anyone.
· The device manufactured by high quality materials which
described why the device is reliable .