SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 64
Download to read offline
ATR Contractor
    Survey
     Fall 2007
1. Front Desk

            Below                          Avg.
       Poor Avg. Avg. Good   Excellent N/A Score

2005

2007

2008
1. Front Desk

            Below                          Avg.
       Poor Avg. Avg. Good   Excellent N/A Score

2005    1    3     10   60      48      7   89%


2007

2008
1. Front Desk

            Below                          Avg.
       Poor Avg. Avg. Good   Excellent N/A Score

2005    1    3     10   60      48      7   89%


2007 1       1     8    22      47     6    92%


2008
1. Front Desk

            Below                          Avg.
       Poor Avg. Avg. Good   Excellent N/A Score

2005    1    3     10   60      48      7   89%


2007 1       1     8    22      47     6    92%


2008    0    1     9    47      63     1    92%
2. The Recruiter who
   Placed You in Your Current
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score
2005


2007

2008
2. The Recruiter who
   Placed You in Your Current
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score
2005    0       3      3      35     81     7     94%



2007

2008
2. The Recruiter who
   Placed You in Your Current
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score
2005    0       3      3      35     81     7     94%



2007    0       1      6      20      54    3     94%


2008
2. The Recruiter who
   Placed You in Your Current
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score
2005    0       3      3      35     81     7     94%



2007    0       1      6      20      54    3     94%


2008    0       2      8      42     73     17    93%
3. Interview Process
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score


2005


2007

2008
3. Interview Process
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score


2005    0      2       9      59     51     8     90%



2007

2008
3. Interview Process
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score


2005    0      2       9      59     51     8     90%



2007    0      2       8      29     40     4     91%


2008
3. Interview Process
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score


2005    0      2       9      59     51     8     90%



2007    0      2       8      29     40     4     91%


2008    0      1       8      56     55     22    91%
4. Orientation Process
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005

2007


2008
4. Orientation Process
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005    1       4      15     64    38     7      88%


2007


2008
4. Orientation Process
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005    1       4      15     64    38     7      88%


2007    1       2      9      32     34    4      89%



2008
4. Orientation Process
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005    1       4      15     64    38     7      88%


2007    1       2      9      32     34    4      89%



2008    0      5      17      55    55    10      89%
5. Your Current Job/
       Assignment Satisfaction
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005


2007


2008
5. Your Current Job/
       Assignment Satisfaction
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005    1       2      7      45     71     1     91%



2007


2008
5. Your Current Job/
       Assignment Satisfaction
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005    1       2      7      45     71     1     91%



2007    0       2      7      30     44     1     91%


2008
5. Your Current Job/
       Assignment Satisfaction
              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005    1       2      7      45     71     1     91%



2007    0       2      7      30     44     1     91%


2008    2      1       13     43     74     8     92%
6. ATR Staff Availability
               Below                               Avg.
        Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
                Avg.                               Score


2005

2007

2008
6. ATR Staff Availability
               Below                               Avg.
        Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
                Avg.                               Score


2005     0       2      13     57     56     1     90%


2007

2008
6. ATR Staff Availability
               Below                               Avg.
        Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
                Avg.                               Score


2005     0       2      13     57     56     1     90%


2007     1       1      10     27     45     0     91%


2008
6. ATR Staff Availability
               Below                               Avg.
        Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
                Avg.                               Score


2005     0       2      13     57     56     1     90%


2007     1       1      10     27     45     0     91%


2008     0       2      13     50     73     4     92%
7. Issue Resolution

              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005


2007

2008
7. Issue Resolution

              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005    1       7      11     49     52     9     83%


2007

2008
7. Issue Resolution

              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005    1       7      11     49     52     9     83%


2007    0       4      8      29     39     5     85%


2008
7. Issue Resolution

              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005    1       7      11     49     52     9     83%


2007    0       4      8      29     39     5     85%


2008    1       5      13     44     60     19    90%
8. Staff Courtesy

               Below                               Avg.
       Poor            Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
                Avg.                               Score

2005

2007


2008
8. Staff Courtesy

               Below                               Avg.
       Poor            Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
                Avg.                               Score

2005    0        1      6      51     69     1     92%


2007


2008
8. Staff Courtesy

               Below                               Avg.
       Poor            Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
                Avg.                               Score

2005    0        1      6      51     69     1     92%


2007    0        1      7      27     47     1     92%


2008
8. Staff Courtesy

               Below                               Avg.
       Poor            Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
                Avg.                               Score

2005    0        1      6      51     69     1     92%


2007    0        1      7      27     47     1     92%


2008    0       1       5      50     83     2     93%
9. ATR’s Ability to Provide You
        with the Necessary Timecard/
           Paycheck Information
               Below                               Avg.
        Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
                Avg.                               Score

2005

2007


2008
9. ATR’s Ability to Provide You
        with the Necessary Timecard/
           Paycheck Information
               Below                               Avg.
        Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
                Avg.                               Score

2005     2       5      7      39     74     2     92%


2007


2008
9. ATR’s Ability to Provide You
        with the Necessary Timecard/
           Paycheck Information
               Below                               Avg.
        Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
                Avg.                               Score

2005     2       5      7      39     74     2     92%


2007     0       2      5      27     47     1     92%


2008
9. ATR’s Ability to Provide You
        with the Necessary Timecard/
           Paycheck Information
               Below                               Avg.
        Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
                Avg.                               Score

2005     2       5      7      39     74     2     92%


2007     0       2      5      27     47     1     92%


2008     1      4       9      39     87     2     93%
10. Have you worked with
other staffing firms in the
           past?

           2005   2007   2008

     Yes

     No
10. Have you worked with
other staffing firms in the
           past?

           2005   2007   2008

     Yes    80

     No     28
10. Have you worked with
other staffing firms in the
           past?

           2005   2007   2008

     Yes    80    34

     No     28    22
10. Have you worked with
other staffing firms in the
           past?

           2005   2007   2008

     Yes    80    34     93

     No     28    22     49
11. If yes, how does ATR
compare to these firms?


              2005   2007   2008
  Excellent
  Good
  Average
  Below
  Poor
11. If yes, how does ATR
compare to these firms?


              2005   2007   2008
  Excellent    38
  Good         31
  Average      5
  Below        5
  Poor         1
11. If yes, how does ATR
compare to these firms?


              2005   2007   2008
  Excellent    38     21
  Good         31     15
  Average      5      6
  Below        5      2
  Poor         1      1
11. If yes, how does ATR
compare to these firms?


              2005   2007   2008
  Excellent    38     21     55
  Good         31     15     29
  Average      5      6      8
  Below        5      2      2
  Poor         1      1      2
12. Overall Experience

              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005

2007


2008
12. Overall Experience

              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005    2       5      7      39     74     2     92%


2007


2008
12. Overall Experience

              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005    2       5      7      39     74     2     92%


2007    0       2      5      27     47     1     93%


2008
12. Overall Experience

              Below                               Avg.
       Poor           Avg.   Good Excellent N/A
               Avg.                               Score

2005    2       5      7      39     74     2     92%


2007    0       2      5      27     47     1     93%


2008    1       3      9      50     78     0     92%
13. How did you hear about
              ATR?

                           2005   2007   2008
ATR Client                  34     12     19

Referred by a friend
                            29     23     25

Contacted by a Recruiter    21     10     27


Internet /Posting/ Ads      20     23     30
14. Is There Anything in Your
Experience with ATR That You Felt
  Could Have been Done Better?

2005                2007
14. Is There Anything in Your
      Experience with ATR That You Felt
        Could Have been Done Better?

      2005                2007
Timecard / Payroll   12

Better
                     12
Communication

Orientation          7

Be More
                     4
Professional

Better Benefits       3
14. Is There Anything in Your
      Experience with ATR That You Felt
        Could Have been Done Better?

      2005                         2007
Timecard / Payroll   12   Better Communication        4

Better                    Better Benefits              4
                     12
Communication
                          Availability of ATR Staff   4
Orientation          7
                          Not Enough Contact
                                                      4
Be More                   about Jobs
                     4
Professional
                          Timecard /Payroll           3
Better Benefits       3
                          Timecard Reconciliation     2
14a. Is There Anything in Your
Experience with ATR That You Felt
  Could Have been Done Better?
                            2008

     Better Benefits          10

     Time Cards / Payroll    8

     Communication           5

     Job Satisfaction        4

     Orientation             3
15. What are the Three Most Important
  Things You Look for in a Staffing
                Firm?
  2005                     2007
15. What are the Three Most Important
     Things You Look for in a Staffing
                   Firm?
        2005                    2007
Respect / Concern for my   26
Needs
Professionalism            21
Quick Assignment to
                           18
Job
Quality Jobs               17
Staff Availability         14
Quality Benefits            12
Quick Issue Resolution     12
Good Pay                   10
15. What are the Three Most Important
     Things You Look for in a Staffing
                   Firm?
        2005                                   2007
Respect / Concern for my        Courtesy                   13
                           26
Needs
                                Quality Jobs               9
Professionalism            21
                                Respect / Concern for my
Quick Assignment to                                        6
                           18   Needs
Job
Quality Jobs               17   Staff Availability         5

Staff Availability         14   Good Communication with
                                                           5
                                Employee
Quality Benefits            12
Quick Issue Resolution     12   Professionalism            5

Good Pay                   10   Quick Assignment to Jobs   4
15a. What are the three most
important things you look for in a
          staffing firm?

                                    2008
    Good Communication /
                                     39
    Investment in Employees
    Good match with job / Quality
                                     31
    and Speed of placement

    Good Pay                         14


    Benefits                          11
Comment #1


“ I like the staff, their very nice and friendly. Their
willingness to help and their ability to communicate
is what makes them an excellent staffing firm. ”
Comment #2


“When there is a new contact person for recruiting,
payroll or benefits please e-mail the change.”
Comment #3


“Please provide a better healthcare plan. It is
pretty stinky...”
Comment #4

“I really feel that us as the clients that are filling
the reqs should come first and the ATR
recruiters should make sure that our needs at
our work places are being met. Also, when an
issue occurs in a work place our recruiters
should be for us and not for the companies that
aren’t treating us very well. I’ve had to deal
with a hostile work environment. ”
Comment #5


“What I liked was how Alisa occasionally
checks up on my progress with the job I was
placed into. It made me feel that I wasn’t left
with the sharks...that if I were to have an issue
with the company or was unhappy with where I
was placed, she would have done something.”
Comment #6



“The ATR Staff is kind, friendly and helpful and
that sums it all for me, so right now that’s
what’s important to me and that’s why I’m still
with ATR.”

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

A KING’S HEART THE STORY OF TSAR BORIS III (Drama) (Feature Film Project in D...
A KING’S HEART THE STORY OF TSAR BORIS III (Drama) (Feature Film Project in D...A KING’S HEART THE STORY OF TSAR BORIS III (Drama) (Feature Film Project in D...
A KING’S HEART THE STORY OF TSAR BORIS III (Drama) (Feature Film Project in D...Art Feeling Films
 
Bromazolam CAS 71368-80-4 high quality opiates, Safe transportation, 99% pure
Bromazolam CAS 71368-80-4 high quality opiates, Safe transportation, 99% pureBromazolam CAS 71368-80-4 high quality opiates, Safe transportation, 99% pure
Bromazolam CAS 71368-80-4 high quality opiates, Safe transportation, 99% pureamy56318795
 
一比一原版(UCL毕业证)伦敦大学学院毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UCL毕业证)伦敦大学学院毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UCL毕业证)伦敦大学学院毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UCL毕业证)伦敦大学学院毕业证成绩单utykdaq
 
一比一原版(OSU毕业证)俄亥俄州立大学哥伦布分校毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(OSU毕业证)俄亥俄州立大学哥伦布分校毕业证成绩单一比一原版(OSU毕业证)俄亥俄州立大学哥伦布分校毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(OSU毕业证)俄亥俄州立大学哥伦布分校毕业证成绩单utykdaq
 
plantillas-powerpoint-hello-kitty.pptx.n
plantillas-powerpoint-hello-kitty.pptx.nplantillas-powerpoint-hello-kitty.pptx.n
plantillas-powerpoint-hello-kitty.pptx.nMayu Eliz
 
Present Social Bread Company Profile.pdf
Present Social Bread Company Profile.pdfPresent Social Bread Company Profile.pdf
Present Social Bread Company Profile.pdfmichaelvandeburg099
 
the red riding girl story fkjgoifdjgijogifdoin
the red riding girl story fkjgoifdjgijogifdointhe red riding girl story fkjgoifdjgijogifdoin
the red riding girl story fkjgoifdjgijogifdoinkomalbattersea123
 
batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01
batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01
batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01Patricia Pham
 
"My Silence, My Grave: The Making Of" Booklet
"My Silence, My Grave: The Making Of" Booklet"My Silence, My Grave: The Making Of" Booklet
"My Silence, My Grave: The Making Of" BookletDontLarry
 
PPT aviator (A small guide on spinmatch).pptx
PPT aviator (A small guide on spinmatch).pptxPPT aviator (A small guide on spinmatch).pptx
PPT aviator (A small guide on spinmatch).pptxspinmatch13
 
Get the Best Online Lotus ID from the Top Betting ID Provider.
Get the Best Online Lotus ID from the Top Betting ID Provider.Get the Best Online Lotus ID from the Top Betting ID Provider.
Get the Best Online Lotus ID from the Top Betting ID Provider.virat777exch786
 
一比一原版(UAL毕业证)伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UAL毕业证)伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UAL毕业证)伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UAL毕业证)伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单utykdaq
 
Top Best IPTV Providers in the UK for 2024.pdf
Top Best IPTV Providers in the UK for 2024.pdfTop Best IPTV Providers in the UK for 2024.pdf
Top Best IPTV Providers in the UK for 2024.pdfXtreame HDTV
 
Driving & Racing Games Online for Free_ Explore the Excitement with ATM HTML ...
Driving & Racing Games Online for Free_ Explore the Excitement with ATM HTML ...Driving & Racing Games Online for Free_ Explore the Excitement with ATM HTML ...
Driving & Racing Games Online for Free_ Explore the Excitement with ATM HTML ...ATM HTML Games
 
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing the Best HD IPTV Service in 2024.pdf
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing the Best HD IPTV Service in 2024.pdfThe Ultimate Guide to Choosing the Best HD IPTV Service in 2024.pdf
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing the Best HD IPTV Service in 2024.pdfXtreame HDTV
 
一比一原版(Westminster毕业证)威斯敏斯特大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Westminster毕业证)威斯敏斯特大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(Westminster毕业证)威斯敏斯特大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Westminster毕业证)威斯敏斯特大学毕业证成绩单utykdaq
 
一比一原版(SDSU毕业证)圣地亚哥州立大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(SDSU毕业证)圣地亚哥州立大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(SDSU毕业证)圣地亚哥州立大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(SDSU毕业证)圣地亚哥州立大学毕业证成绩单utykdaq
 
Pushpa 2 Release Date not Postponed According to the Makers.pdf
Pushpa 2 Release Date not Postponed According to the Makers.pdfPushpa 2 Release Date not Postponed According to the Makers.pdf
Pushpa 2 Release Date not Postponed According to the Makers.pdfkigaya33
 
The Gaming Quiz - 17th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
The Gaming Quiz - 17th April 2024,  Quiz Club NITWThe Gaming Quiz - 17th April 2024,  Quiz Club NITW
The Gaming Quiz - 17th April 2024, Quiz Club NITWQuiz Club NITW
 

Recently uploaded (20)

A KING’S HEART THE STORY OF TSAR BORIS III (Drama) (Feature Film Project in D...
A KING’S HEART THE STORY OF TSAR BORIS III (Drama) (Feature Film Project in D...A KING’S HEART THE STORY OF TSAR BORIS III (Drama) (Feature Film Project in D...
A KING’S HEART THE STORY OF TSAR BORIS III (Drama) (Feature Film Project in D...
 
Bromazolam CAS 71368-80-4 high quality opiates, Safe transportation, 99% pure
Bromazolam CAS 71368-80-4 high quality opiates, Safe transportation, 99% pureBromazolam CAS 71368-80-4 high quality opiates, Safe transportation, 99% pure
Bromazolam CAS 71368-80-4 high quality opiates, Safe transportation, 99% pure
 
一比一原版(UCL毕业证)伦敦大学学院毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UCL毕业证)伦敦大学学院毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UCL毕业证)伦敦大学学院毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UCL毕业证)伦敦大学学院毕业证成绩单
 
一比一原版(OSU毕业证)俄亥俄州立大学哥伦布分校毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(OSU毕业证)俄亥俄州立大学哥伦布分校毕业证成绩单一比一原版(OSU毕业证)俄亥俄州立大学哥伦布分校毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(OSU毕业证)俄亥俄州立大学哥伦布分校毕业证成绩单
 
plantillas-powerpoint-hello-kitty.pptx.n
plantillas-powerpoint-hello-kitty.pptx.nplantillas-powerpoint-hello-kitty.pptx.n
plantillas-powerpoint-hello-kitty.pptx.n
 
Present Social Bread Company Profile.pdf
Present Social Bread Company Profile.pdfPresent Social Bread Company Profile.pdf
Present Social Bread Company Profile.pdf
 
the red riding girl story fkjgoifdjgijogifdoin
the red riding girl story fkjgoifdjgijogifdointhe red riding girl story fkjgoifdjgijogifdoin
the red riding girl story fkjgoifdjgijogifdoin
 
batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01
batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01
batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01batwheels_01
 
kiff2
kiff2kiff2
kiff2
 
"My Silence, My Grave: The Making Of" Booklet
"My Silence, My Grave: The Making Of" Booklet"My Silence, My Grave: The Making Of" Booklet
"My Silence, My Grave: The Making Of" Booklet
 
PPT aviator (A small guide on spinmatch).pptx
PPT aviator (A small guide on spinmatch).pptxPPT aviator (A small guide on spinmatch).pptx
PPT aviator (A small guide on spinmatch).pptx
 
Get the Best Online Lotus ID from the Top Betting ID Provider.
Get the Best Online Lotus ID from the Top Betting ID Provider.Get the Best Online Lotus ID from the Top Betting ID Provider.
Get the Best Online Lotus ID from the Top Betting ID Provider.
 
一比一原版(UAL毕业证)伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UAL毕业证)伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(UAL毕业证)伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(UAL毕业证)伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单
 
Top Best IPTV Providers in the UK for 2024.pdf
Top Best IPTV Providers in the UK for 2024.pdfTop Best IPTV Providers in the UK for 2024.pdf
Top Best IPTV Providers in the UK for 2024.pdf
 
Driving & Racing Games Online for Free_ Explore the Excitement with ATM HTML ...
Driving & Racing Games Online for Free_ Explore the Excitement with ATM HTML ...Driving & Racing Games Online for Free_ Explore the Excitement with ATM HTML ...
Driving & Racing Games Online for Free_ Explore the Excitement with ATM HTML ...
 
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing the Best HD IPTV Service in 2024.pdf
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing the Best HD IPTV Service in 2024.pdfThe Ultimate Guide to Choosing the Best HD IPTV Service in 2024.pdf
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing the Best HD IPTV Service in 2024.pdf
 
一比一原版(Westminster毕业证)威斯敏斯特大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Westminster毕业证)威斯敏斯特大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(Westminster毕业证)威斯敏斯特大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(Westminster毕业证)威斯敏斯特大学毕业证成绩单
 
一比一原版(SDSU毕业证)圣地亚哥州立大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(SDSU毕业证)圣地亚哥州立大学毕业证成绩单一比一原版(SDSU毕业证)圣地亚哥州立大学毕业证成绩单
一比一原版(SDSU毕业证)圣地亚哥州立大学毕业证成绩单
 
Pushpa 2 Release Date not Postponed According to the Makers.pdf
Pushpa 2 Release Date not Postponed According to the Makers.pdfPushpa 2 Release Date not Postponed According to the Makers.pdf
Pushpa 2 Release Date not Postponed According to the Makers.pdf
 
The Gaming Quiz - 17th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
The Gaming Quiz - 17th April 2024,  Quiz Club NITWThe Gaming Quiz - 17th April 2024,  Quiz Club NITW
The Gaming Quiz - 17th April 2024, Quiz Club NITW
 

Featured

2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by HubspotMarius Sescu
 
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPTEverything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPTExpeed Software
 
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsProduct Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsPixeldarts
 
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthHow Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthThinkNow
 
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfAI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfmarketingartwork
 
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024Neil Kimberley
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)contently
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024Albert Qian
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsKurio // The Social Media Age(ncy)
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Search Engine Journal
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summarySpeakerHub
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Tessa Mero
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentLily Ray
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best PracticesVit Horky
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementMindGenius
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...RachelPearson36
 

Featured (20)

2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
 
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPTEverything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
 
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsProduct Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
 
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthHow Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
 
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfAI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
 
Skeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture CodeSkeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture Code
 
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
 
How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations
 
Introduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data ScienceIntroduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data Science
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project management
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
 

Contractor Survey 2008

  • 1. ATR Contractor Survey Fall 2007
  • 2. 1. Front Desk Below Avg. Poor Avg. Avg. Good Excellent N/A Score 2005 2007 2008
  • 3. 1. Front Desk Below Avg. Poor Avg. Avg. Good Excellent N/A Score 2005 1 3 10 60 48 7 89% 2007 2008
  • 4. 1. Front Desk Below Avg. Poor Avg. Avg. Good Excellent N/A Score 2005 1 3 10 60 48 7 89% 2007 1 1 8 22 47 6 92% 2008
  • 5. 1. Front Desk Below Avg. Poor Avg. Avg. Good Excellent N/A Score 2005 1 3 10 60 48 7 89% 2007 1 1 8 22 47 6 92% 2008 0 1 9 47 63 1 92%
  • 6. 2. The Recruiter who Placed You in Your Current Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  • 7. 2. The Recruiter who Placed You in Your Current Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 3 3 35 81 7 94% 2007 2008
  • 8. 2. The Recruiter who Placed You in Your Current Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 3 3 35 81 7 94% 2007 0 1 6 20 54 3 94% 2008
  • 9. 2. The Recruiter who Placed You in Your Current Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 3 3 35 81 7 94% 2007 0 1 6 20 54 3 94% 2008 0 2 8 42 73 17 93%
  • 10. 3. Interview Process Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  • 11. 3. Interview Process Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 2 9 59 51 8 90% 2007 2008
  • 12. 3. Interview Process Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 2 9 59 51 8 90% 2007 0 2 8 29 40 4 91% 2008
  • 13. 3. Interview Process Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 2 9 59 51 8 90% 2007 0 2 8 29 40 4 91% 2008 0 1 8 56 55 22 91%
  • 14. 4. Orientation Process Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  • 15. 4. Orientation Process Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 1 4 15 64 38 7 88% 2007 2008
  • 16. 4. Orientation Process Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 1 4 15 64 38 7 88% 2007 1 2 9 32 34 4 89% 2008
  • 17. 4. Orientation Process Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 1 4 15 64 38 7 88% 2007 1 2 9 32 34 4 89% 2008 0 5 17 55 55 10 89%
  • 18. 5. Your Current Job/ Assignment Satisfaction Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  • 19. 5. Your Current Job/ Assignment Satisfaction Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 1 2 7 45 71 1 91% 2007 2008
  • 20. 5. Your Current Job/ Assignment Satisfaction Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 1 2 7 45 71 1 91% 2007 0 2 7 30 44 1 91% 2008
  • 21. 5. Your Current Job/ Assignment Satisfaction Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 1 2 7 45 71 1 91% 2007 0 2 7 30 44 1 91% 2008 2 1 13 43 74 8 92%
  • 22. 6. ATR Staff Availability Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  • 23. 6. ATR Staff Availability Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 2 13 57 56 1 90% 2007 2008
  • 24. 6. ATR Staff Availability Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 2 13 57 56 1 90% 2007 1 1 10 27 45 0 91% 2008
  • 25. 6. ATR Staff Availability Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 2 13 57 56 1 90% 2007 1 1 10 27 45 0 91% 2008 0 2 13 50 73 4 92%
  • 26. 7. Issue Resolution Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  • 27. 7. Issue Resolution Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 1 7 11 49 52 9 83% 2007 2008
  • 28. 7. Issue Resolution Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 1 7 11 49 52 9 83% 2007 0 4 8 29 39 5 85% 2008
  • 29. 7. Issue Resolution Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 1 7 11 49 52 9 83% 2007 0 4 8 29 39 5 85% 2008 1 5 13 44 60 19 90%
  • 30. 8. Staff Courtesy Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  • 31. 8. Staff Courtesy Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 1 6 51 69 1 92% 2007 2008
  • 32. 8. Staff Courtesy Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 1 6 51 69 1 92% 2007 0 1 7 27 47 1 92% 2008
  • 33. 8. Staff Courtesy Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 0 1 6 51 69 1 92% 2007 0 1 7 27 47 1 92% 2008 0 1 5 50 83 2 93%
  • 34. 9. ATR’s Ability to Provide You with the Necessary Timecard/ Paycheck Information Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  • 35. 9. ATR’s Ability to Provide You with the Necessary Timecard/ Paycheck Information Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2 5 7 39 74 2 92% 2007 2008
  • 36. 9. ATR’s Ability to Provide You with the Necessary Timecard/ Paycheck Information Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2 5 7 39 74 2 92% 2007 0 2 5 27 47 1 92% 2008
  • 37. 9. ATR’s Ability to Provide You with the Necessary Timecard/ Paycheck Information Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2 5 7 39 74 2 92% 2007 0 2 5 27 47 1 92% 2008 1 4 9 39 87 2 93%
  • 38. 10. Have you worked with other staffing firms in the past? 2005 2007 2008 Yes No
  • 39. 10. Have you worked with other staffing firms in the past? 2005 2007 2008 Yes 80 No 28
  • 40. 10. Have you worked with other staffing firms in the past? 2005 2007 2008 Yes 80 34 No 28 22
  • 41. 10. Have you worked with other staffing firms in the past? 2005 2007 2008 Yes 80 34 93 No 28 22 49
  • 42. 11. If yes, how does ATR compare to these firms? 2005 2007 2008 Excellent Good Average Below Poor
  • 43. 11. If yes, how does ATR compare to these firms? 2005 2007 2008 Excellent 38 Good 31 Average 5 Below 5 Poor 1
  • 44. 11. If yes, how does ATR compare to these firms? 2005 2007 2008 Excellent 38 21 Good 31 15 Average 5 6 Below 5 2 Poor 1 1
  • 45. 11. If yes, how does ATR compare to these firms? 2005 2007 2008 Excellent 38 21 55 Good 31 15 29 Average 5 6 8 Below 5 2 2 Poor 1 1 2
  • 46. 12. Overall Experience Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2007 2008
  • 47. 12. Overall Experience Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2 5 7 39 74 2 92% 2007 2008
  • 48. 12. Overall Experience Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2 5 7 39 74 2 92% 2007 0 2 5 27 47 1 93% 2008
  • 49. 12. Overall Experience Below Avg. Poor Avg. Good Excellent N/A Avg. Score 2005 2 5 7 39 74 2 92% 2007 0 2 5 27 47 1 93% 2008 1 3 9 50 78 0 92%
  • 50. 13. How did you hear about ATR? 2005 2007 2008 ATR Client 34 12 19 Referred by a friend 29 23 25 Contacted by a Recruiter 21 10 27 Internet /Posting/ Ads 20 23 30
  • 51. 14. Is There Anything in Your Experience with ATR That You Felt Could Have been Done Better? 2005 2007
  • 52. 14. Is There Anything in Your Experience with ATR That You Felt Could Have been Done Better? 2005 2007 Timecard / Payroll 12 Better 12 Communication Orientation 7 Be More 4 Professional Better Benefits 3
  • 53. 14. Is There Anything in Your Experience with ATR That You Felt Could Have been Done Better? 2005 2007 Timecard / Payroll 12 Better Communication 4 Better Better Benefits 4 12 Communication Availability of ATR Staff 4 Orientation 7 Not Enough Contact 4 Be More about Jobs 4 Professional Timecard /Payroll 3 Better Benefits 3 Timecard Reconciliation 2
  • 54. 14a. Is There Anything in Your Experience with ATR That You Felt Could Have been Done Better? 2008 Better Benefits 10 Time Cards / Payroll 8 Communication 5 Job Satisfaction 4 Orientation 3
  • 55. 15. What are the Three Most Important Things You Look for in a Staffing Firm? 2005 2007
  • 56. 15. What are the Three Most Important Things You Look for in a Staffing Firm? 2005 2007 Respect / Concern for my 26 Needs Professionalism 21 Quick Assignment to 18 Job Quality Jobs 17 Staff Availability 14 Quality Benefits 12 Quick Issue Resolution 12 Good Pay 10
  • 57. 15. What are the Three Most Important Things You Look for in a Staffing Firm? 2005 2007 Respect / Concern for my Courtesy 13 26 Needs Quality Jobs 9 Professionalism 21 Respect / Concern for my Quick Assignment to 6 18 Needs Job Quality Jobs 17 Staff Availability 5 Staff Availability 14 Good Communication with 5 Employee Quality Benefits 12 Quick Issue Resolution 12 Professionalism 5 Good Pay 10 Quick Assignment to Jobs 4
  • 58. 15a. What are the three most important things you look for in a staffing firm? 2008 Good Communication / 39 Investment in Employees Good match with job / Quality 31 and Speed of placement Good Pay 14 Benefits 11
  • 59. Comment #1 “ I like the staff, their very nice and friendly. Their willingness to help and their ability to communicate is what makes them an excellent staffing firm. ”
  • 60. Comment #2 “When there is a new contact person for recruiting, payroll or benefits please e-mail the change.”
  • 61. Comment #3 “Please provide a better healthcare plan. It is pretty stinky...”
  • 62. Comment #4 “I really feel that us as the clients that are filling the reqs should come first and the ATR recruiters should make sure that our needs at our work places are being met. Also, when an issue occurs in a work place our recruiters should be for us and not for the companies that aren’t treating us very well. I’ve had to deal with a hostile work environment. ”
  • 63. Comment #5 “What I liked was how Alisa occasionally checks up on my progress with the job I was placed into. It made me feel that I wasn’t left with the sharks...that if I were to have an issue with the company or was unhappy with where I was placed, she would have done something.”
  • 64. Comment #6 “The ATR Staff is kind, friendly and helpful and that sums it all for me, so right now that’s what’s important to me and that’s why I’m still with ATR.”