1. STATE PROFILES – UTTARAKHAND

2. ECONOMIC CHALLENGE FOR CHIEF MINISTERS IN 2012
Achieving Fiscal
Stability
Enhancing State
Competitiveness
• Competitiveness is the only way to achieve sustainable job growth, improving
incomes and stable public finances
• Creating a clear economic strategy for the state that engages all stakeholders is
even more important in times of budget cutting and austerity

3. 4 Major
Pillars
12 Sub Indices
350* Indicators
HIERARCHY OF MEASUREMENT OF STATE COMPETITIVENESS INDEX
* Approximate figure

4. STAGES OF THE ECONOMY
Innovation Driven Economies (Per capita GDP 900 to
1300 USD)
Transition Economies (Per capita GDP 800 to 900 USD)
Investment Driven Economies (Per capita GDP 500 to
800 USD)
Evolving / Changeover Economies (Per capita GDP 400
to 500 USD)
Factor Driven Economies(Per capita GDP < 400 USD)
City States (Per capita GDP>1300 USD)

5. Categorization
Microeconomic Competitiveness
Ranks
City States (Per capita Incomes >1300 USD)
Delhi 1
Goa 2
Innovation Driven Economies (Per capita Incomes 900 to1300 USD)
Haryana 1
Maharashtra 2
Gujarat 3
Kerala 4
Transition Economies (Per capita Incomes 800 to 900 USD)
Punjab 1
Tamil Nadu 2
Himachal Pradesh 3
Investment Driven Economies (Per capita Incomes 500 to 800 USD)
Andhra Pradesh 1
Karnataka 2
Uttarakhand 3
West Bengal 4
Chhattisgarh 5
Sikkim 6
Mizoram 7
Meghalaya 8
Arunachal Pradesh 9
Tripura 10
Evolving/ Changeover Economies (Per capita Incomes 400 to 500 USD)
Rajasthan 1
Jharkhand 2
Orissa 3
Jammu and Kashmir 4
Factor Driven Economies(Per capita Incomes < 500 USD)
Bihar 1
Madhya Pradesh 2
Assam 3
Uttar Pradesh 4
Manipur 5
Nagaland 6
STATES ACCORDING TO CATEGORIZATION
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

6. NEAR TERM STATE PROSPERITY PERFORMANCE
Jammu & Kashmir
Himachal Pradesh
Punjab
Haryana
Uttar Pradesh
Rajasthan
Delhi
Uttarakhand
Bihar
Orissa
West Bengal
Assam
Meghalaya
Tripura
Mizoram
Manipur
Nagaland
Arunachal Pradesh
Sikkim
Jharkhand
Gujarat
Maharashtra
Goa
Madhya Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Kerala
Tamil Nadu
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000
Gross Domestic Product per Capita, 2011
Gross
Domestic
Product
per
Capita
real
growth
rate,
2008-2011
All
India
Average
57.28
Index
Points
All India GSDP
/Capita rate
(CAGR) of 6.27 %
All India Average
of 47,998
Rupees/capita
Highly Productive and Prosperity
Rising versus India
High but declining versus India
Low but rising versus India
Low and declining versus India

7. COMPETITIVENESS: UNDERLYING CONCEPTS
• Competitiveness is the productivity with which a state utilizes its human,
capital, and natural resources
• Productivity determines wages and the standard of living – Productivity
growth determines sustainable economic growth
• Productivity depends on how a state competes, not what industries it
competes in
• Innovation in products and processes is necessary to drive productivity
growth
• Only productive businesses can create wealth and jobs. States compete to
offer the most productive environment for business
• The public and private sectors play different but interrelated roles in creating
a productive economy

8. UTTARAKHAND PERFORMANCE SNAPSHOT
Top 33.33% of the
states
33.33%-66.67% of
the states
66.67% to 100% of
the states
Position Trend
Prosperity
Productivity
Labour Mobilization
State of Clusters
Leading Clusters
Agricultural Products
Domestic and Electric Industries
Wood and forest products
Type of Economy Investment Driven

9. Labour Mobilization
Population, 2011 Rank: 5
• In Uttarakhand 1,01,16,752
• % of India 0.838 %
Population Growth, GAGR, 2001-2011 Rank: 5
• In Uttarakhand 1.77%
• In India 1.61%
Employment, 2010 Rank: 5
• In Uttarakhand 2179074
• % India 0.766%
Employment growth, annual rate, 2000-2010 Rank: 5
• In Uttarakhand 2.23%
• In India 2.05%
Unemployment, 2010 (Per hundred People) Rank: 9
• In Uttarakhand 4.90
• In India 9.39
Change in Unemployment rate, 2000-2010 Rank: 8
• In Uttarakhand -26.87%
• In India 41.37
Clusters
Total Number of People employed in all Factory sector Rank: 4
• In Uttarakhand 2,38,795
• In India 1,15,06,838
• State Employment to total
India Employment (factory sector) 2.07%
Productivity
Gross State Domestic Product per labour force participant, 2011 Rank: 4
• In Uttarakhand Rs 1.10.568
• In India Rs 1,21,265
• State Difference to India -8.82%
Growth in Gross State Domestic Product Rank: 3
per Labour force participant, 2001-11
• In Uttarakhand 9.44%
• In India 8.44%
Average Private Wage in 2008-09, Rank: 1
• In Uttarakhand Rs 1,03,729
• In India Rs 64,741
• State Difference to India +60.21%
Private Wage Growth, CAGR, 2000-2009 Rank:5
• In Uttarakhand 2.18%
• In India 4.53%
Prosperity
Gross State Domestic Product per Capita, 2011 Rank: 4
• In Uttarakhand Rs. 44,407
• In India Rs. 47,998
• State Difference to India -5.39%.
Growth in Gross State Domestic Product per Capita, 2008-11 , (CAGR) Rank: 5
• In Uttarakhand 6.44%
• In India 6.28%
UTTARAKHAND COMPETITIVENESS – OVERALL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

10. GSDP
at
current
price
at
factor
cost
in
Rupees
Crore
UNDERSTANDING STATE ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE
12621
14501
15826
18473
20439
23720
26179
31380
35592
40159
40544
43572
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Uttarakhand
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

11. GSDP
at
current
price
at
factor
cost
in
Rupees
Crore
CONTRIBUTION OF UTTARAKHAND’S GSDP TO INDIAN GSDP
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Ratio of
Uttarkhand's
GSDP to Indian
GDP in
Percentage
Terms
0.74 0.81 0.82 0.89 0.87 0.90 0.88 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.81 0.87
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
6000000
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Uttarakhand's GDP Indian GDP

12. WHAT DRIVES STATE PRODUCTIVITY
1. Overall business
climate conducive to
growth
2. Stage of Economy
(strong clusters)
3. Proper Policy
enactment and strong
rule of law

13. MODEL USED FOR ANALYSIS
Climate for
Innovation based
local rivalry
Clusters of Related
and Supporting
Industries
Demand
Conditions
• Local rules and incentives that encourage
investment and productivity e.g.
- salaries,
- incentives for capital investments,
- intellectual property protection
• Vigorous local competition i.e.,
- Openness to foreign and local competition;
- Sophistication of company operations
Local availability of suppliers and supporting industries
Presence of clusters instead of isolated firms
Sophisticated and demanding local
customers and needs e.g.,
- Strict quality, safety, and environmental
standards
– Consumer protection laws
– Government procurement of
advanced technology
– Early demand for products and
Services.
Access to high quality business inputs
i.e.,
- Natural endowments,
- Human resources,
- Capital availability,
- Physical infrastructure,
- Administrative infrastructure,
- Information infrastructure,
- Scientific and technological infrastructure
Factor
Conditions
Source: Michael E Porter

14. IMPROVING PRODUCTIVITY IN BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
Key Issues for States
• More power in terms of tax sharing with center
• Reduce costs of doing business
• Developing training programs which meet the specific needs of the state
industrial clusters
• Focus on infrastructure investments on the most leveraged areas for
productivity and economic growth
• Implementing policies to support small growth businesses
• Enhancing the state’s skill development and training institutions for the same
• Relentlessly improve of the public education system, the essential foundation

15. Nation
Neighboring states
States
City Regions
Rural Regions
GEOGRAPHIC INFLUENCES ON COMPETITIVENESS
• Influence and access federal
policies and programs
• Integrate policies and
infrastructure with
neighbors
• Assist each city area in
developing its own strategy
• Connect rural regions with
urban areas

16. CONTRIBUTION OF AGRICULTURE SECTOR TO GSDP
GSDP
at
current
price
at
factor
cost
in
Rupees
Crore
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Ratio of
Agricultural
GSDP in
Uttarakhand to
the total GSDP
in Uttarakhand
in Percentage
terms
28.96 27.93 25.12 23.85 23.30 22.29 20.33 19.37 17.55 15.51 16.64 16.21
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

17. CONTRIBUTION OF MANUFACTURING SECTOR TO GSDP
GSDP
at
current
price
at
factor
cost
in
Rupees
Crore
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Ratio of
Manufacturi
ng GSDP in
Uttarakhand
to the total
GSDP in
Uttarakhand
in
Percentage
terms
9.30 11.60 10.03 11.86 12.07 12.65 12.87 12.77 12.78 13.13 13.24 13.33
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

18. CONTRIBUTION OF SERVICE SECTOR TO GSDP
GSDP
at
current
price
at
factor
cost
in
Rupees
Crore
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Ratio of
Services
GSDP in
Uttarakhand
to the total
GSDP in
Uttarakhand
in
Percentage
terms
51.11 49.95 51.85 49.70 50.65 49.88 50.06 49.31 49.30 49.61 49.40 49.35
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Dec-04 Dec-05 Dec-06 Dec-07 Dec-08 Dec-09 Dec-10 Dec-11
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

19. Agriculture, forestry
and fishing
16%
Industry
35%
Services
49%
COMPOSITION OF UTTARAKHAND’S ECONOMY
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

20. GSDP
in
Rs.
Crore
Indian contribution
Uttarakhand’s contribution
7062 15007 21503
924340
1492375
2549085
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
Agriculture, forestry and fishing Industry Services
COMPOSITION OF UTTARAKHAND’S ECONOMY
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

21. Uttarakhand
/National
GSDP
share
(Percent)
,2011
Change in contribution of GSDP of Uttarakhand to total Indian GSDP, CAGR (2000-2011)
Agricuture
Banking and insurance
Communication
Construction
Electricity, gas and water supply
Fishing
Forestry and logging
Manufacturing
Mining and quarrying
Other services
Public administration and defence
Railways
Real states, ownership of dwellings and
business services
Storage
Trade, hotel and restaurant
Transport by other means
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
COMPOSITION OF UTTARAKHAND’S ECONOMY IN GREATER DEPTH

22. STATE PRIVATE WAGE PERFORMANCE
Jammu & Kashmir
Himachal Pradesh
Punjub
Uttarakhand
Haryana
Delhi
Rajasthan
Uttar Pradesh
Bihar
Nagaland
Manipur
Tripura
Meghalaya
Assam
West Bengal
Jharkhand
Orissa
Chhattisgarh Madhya Pradesh
Gujarat
Maharashtra
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Goa
Kerala Tamil Nadu
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Wage Growth (CAGR), 2001 to 2008
Low and declining versus India Low but rising versus India
Average Wage :
Rupees 64,741
Wage Growth
rate 4.53%
Average
Wages
in
Rupees
,2009
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Data as of 2010

23. LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00
All
India
Averag
e
57.28
Index
Points
All India Average of of
1,21,265 Rupees/Labour
force participant
All India Average of
8.44%
GSDP /Labor force participant growth rate(CAGR)
GSDP
at
Current
Prices
per
labour
force
participant,
2011
High but declining versus India Highly productive and Productivity
rising versus India
Low but rising versus India
Low and declining versus India
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

24. LONG TERM JOB GROWTH
Jammu & Kashmir
Himachal Pradesh
Punjab
Haryana
Uttar Pradesh
Rajasthan
Delhi
Uttarakhand
Bihar
Orissa
West Bengal
Assam
Meghalaya
Tripura Mizoram Manipur
Nagaland Arunachal Pradesh
Sikkim
Jharkhand
Gujarat
Maharashtra
Goa
Madhya Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Kerala
Tamil Nadu
0
10000000
20000000
30000000
40000000
50000000
60000000
70000000
80000000
90000000
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Job growth rate CAGR, 2001-2010
Number
of
Jobs,
2011
Losing Jobs Gaining Jobs
All India average of
1,62,99,464 Jobs
/State
All India Average of
2.05%
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis,

25. Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu
jharkhand
Karnataka
kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Delhi
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
Change in Employment rate 1999-2010
Unemployment rate
All India Average of
9.39%
All
India
Avera
ge
57.28
Index
Point
s
All India Average of -
2.12%
Unemployment Rising
Below average Unemployment
Above Average Unemployment
Unemployment
rate
2010
LONG TERM UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Data as of 2010

26. NEAR TERM UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu
jharkhand
Karnataka
kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram Nagaland
Delhi
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10
Change in Employment rate 2008 to 2010
All India Average of
9.39%
All
India
Avera
ge
57.28
Index
Points
All India Average of -
6.55%
Unemployment
rate
2010
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis,
Source : Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Data as of 2010

27. GROSS AREA SOWN VERSUS IRRIGATED AREA
Jammu & Kashmir
Himachal Pradesh
Punjab
Haryana
Uttar Pradesh
Rajasthan
Delhi
Uttarakhand
BiharOrissa
West Bengal
Assam
Meghalaya
Tripura
Mizoram
Nagaland
Arunachal Pradesh
Sikkim
Jharkhand
Gujarat
Maharashtra
Goa
Madhya Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Kerala
Tamil Nadu
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Log of Irrigated Area in ‘000 hectares
Log
of
area
sown
in
‘000
hectares
All India Average
67,41,000
hectares
All
India
All India Average
30,03,000 hectares
Source: MOA, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Data as of 2010

28. HEALTHCARE
Jammu & Kashmir
Himachal Pradesh
Punjab
Haryana
Uttar Pradesh
Rajasthan
Delhi
Uttarakhand
Bihar
Orissa
West Bengal
Assam
Meghalaya
Tripura
Mizoram
Manipur
Nagaland
Arunachal Pradesh
Sikkim
Jharkhand
Gujarat
Maharashtra
Goa
Madhya Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Kerala
Tamil Nadu
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Percentage
of
Total
government
Expenditure
on
Medical,
Health
and
Sanitation
Total Government Expenditure on Medical, Health and Sanitation in Crores
All India Average
4.02%
All
India
All India Average 1633
Crores
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

29. PERCENTAGE OF VILLAGES ELECTRIFIED
100
56.8
80.8
61.3
96.9
100.0
100.099.7100.098.2 98.2
31.1
99.9100.0
96.4
88.3
85.8
59.3
80.6
64.4 62.6
100.0
69.2
94.4
100.0
57.2
88.3
96.9 97.3
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
All India
Average of
84.96 %
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

30. TELEDENSITY
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 429.33x + 12630
R² = 0.3882
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250
Teledensity
GSDP
per
Capita
Source: Ministry of telecom, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

31. DEBT TO GDP RATIO
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Andhra
Arunachal
Assam
Bihar
Chattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttaranchal
West Bengal
30.1
115.9
28
39.7
15.2
13.8
35.5
32.1
19
55.7
70.1
33.6
24.3
34.3
34.4
25.1
77.4
37.3
109.1
59.4
30.6
35.2
41.1
80.6
25.5
42.2
43.5
41.1
42.8
Prescribed limit according
to WTO for developing
economies
Prescribed limit according to the
growth and stability Pact of EU
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

32. RURAL POPULATION VERSUS RURAL POPULATION GROWTH RATES
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
-10.000
-8.000
-6.000
-4.000
-2.000
0.000
2.000
4.000
10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000
Population in Rural areas as per census (provisional Data) in Thousands
Thousands
Growth
rate
(CAGR
2001-2011)
Source: Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

33. URBAN POPULATION VERSUS URBAN POPULATION GROWTH RATES
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & KashmirJharkhand Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000
Population in Urban areas as per census (provisional Data) in Thousands
Thousands
Growth
rate
(CAGR
2001-2011)
Source: Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

34. RURAL AND URBAN POPULATION IN INDIA
151,726
561,977
313,446
906,309
573,741
822,132
595,036
960,981
688,704
3,091,169
3,414,106
16,333,916
8,821,588
5,936,538
10,387,436
4,388,756
7,929,292
15,932,171
6,996,124
25,712,811
23,578,175
17,080,776
34,949,729
20,059,666
28,353,745
29,134,060
11,729,609
50,827,531
44,470,455
455,962
529037
1069165
551414
1406861
1899624
2368971
2,710,051
6167805
7,025,583
9134820
419319
16531493
19603658
17,316,800
26780516
25,036,946
17455506
34,951,234
34670817
37552529
51,540,236
37,189,229
52537899
56311788
62,213,676
92075028
61545441
155,111,022
0
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
120,000,000
140,000,000
160,000,000
Urban Population in 2011 Rural Population in 2011
Source: Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

35. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE IN UTTARAKHAND
Population
in
Numbers
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
1041000
1000000
971000
1023000
1023000
898000
738000
616000
543000
488000
417000
341000
270000
208000
161000
113000
91000
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
0-4
years
5-9
years
10-14
years
15-19
years
20-24
years
25-29
years
30-34
years
35-39
years
40-44
years
45-49
years
50-54
years
55-59
year
60-64
years
65-69
years
70-74
years
75-79
years
80+
years

36. RURAL URBAN AND TOTAL POPULATION
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
-20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Urban
Population
as
a
percentage
of
total
Population
All India Average
32.98%
All
India
All India Average
67.02%
Source: Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Rural Population as a percentage of total Population

37. SEX RATIO VERSUS SEX RATIO GROWTH RATES
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerela
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
All India Average
0.169% CAGR
All
India
All India Average 940
females/1000 males
CAGR
growth
rate
2001-11
Sex ratio
Source: Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

38. LITERACY RATES VERSUS GDP
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 1576.4x - 73239
R² = 0.254
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
GSDP
per
capita
at
current
prices
2011
Literacy rate 2011
Source: RBI , Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

39. REVENUE EXPENDITURE VERSUS REVENUE RECEIPTS
Revenue
Expenditure
in
Rs.
Crores
Revenue Receipts in Rs. Crores
Jammu & Kashmir
Himachal Pradesh
Punjab
Haryana
Uttar Pradesh
Rajasthan
Delhi
Uttarakhand
Bihar
Orissa
West Bengal
Assam
Meghalaya
Tripura
Mizoram
Manipur
Nagaland
Arunachal Pradesh
Sikkim
Jharkhand
Gujarat
Maharashtra
Goa
Madhya Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Kerala
Tamil Nadu
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000
All
India
All India Average 34757
Rs. Crores
All India Average 34190
Rs. Crores
Source: RBI , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

40. LITERACY RATES VERSUS POPULATION
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerela
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya Mizoram
Nagaland
Delhi
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
0
50000000
100000000
150000000
200000000
250000000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Literacy rates in Percentage terms
All India Average
67232968 People/state
All
India
All India Average
Literacy level of
77.12%
Source: Census 2011 , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

41. Jammu & Kashmir
Himachal Pradesh
Punjab
Haryana
Uttar Pradesh
Rajasthan
Delhi
Uttarakhand
Bihar
Orissa
West Bengal
Assam
Meghalaya
Tripura
Mizoram
Manipur
Nagaland
Arunachal Pradesh
Sikkim
Jharkhand
Gujarat
Maharashtra
Goa
Madhya Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Kerala
Tamil Nadu
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000
Outstanding commercial scheduled bank credit to Agriculture in Rs. Crores
All India Average of
9.30 % CAGR growth
rate
All
India
All India Average of
12,157 Crores/state
CAGR
growth
rate
in
Agriculture
2005-10
GROWTH RATE IN AGRICULTURE VERSUS BANK CREDIT TO AGRICULTURE
Source: MOA , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

42. PERCENTAGE OF FACTORIES IN OPERATION VERSUS TOTAL NUMBER OF
FACTORIES
Jammu & Kashmir
Himachal Pradesh
Punjab
Haryana
Uttar Pradesh
Rajasthan
Delhi
Uttarakhand
Bihar
Orissa
West Bengal
Assam
Meghalaya
Tripura
Manipur
Nagaland
Jharkhand
Gujarat
Maharashtra
Goa
Madhya Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Kerala
Tamil Nadu
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Percentage
of
factories
not
in
operation
Total number of factories
All India Average of 4.1%
factories not in
operation/state average
All
India
All India Average of 6198
Factories/state
Source: ASI , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis, Data as of 2010

43. SLUM POPULATION GROWTH RATE (2001-2011)
Andhra
Arunachal
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00
Population
Decadal
Growth
Rate
Percentage Change in the Slum Population
India’s decadal population
growth rate is 17%.
Average change in
slum population is
26%.
Source: MOUA, Data as of 2010

44. Andhra Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Meghalya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
SPM
Level
(Residential)
SPM Level (Industrial Area)
SPM Level above 140 is
considered dangerous for
residential areas
SPM Level above 400 is
considered dangerous for
industrial areas
SPM is Suspended Particulate matter. The above mentioned limits are are prescribed by Central Pollution Control
Board (CPCB), India.
POLLUTION
Source: CPCB , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

45. AIR POLLUTION
Andhra
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Meghalya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
SPM
Level
(Residential)
SPM Level (Industrial Area)
SPM Level above 140 is
considered dangerous for
residential areas
SPM Level above 400 is
considered dangerous for
industrial areas
SPM is Suspended Particulate matter. The above mentioned limits are are prescribed by Central
Pollution Control Board (CPCB), India.

46. CAPITAL OUTLAY BY MAJOR SECTORS
Social service
14%
Economic service
84%
General economic services
2%
Uttarakhand

47. FACTOR CONDITIONS
GSDP
in
Rs.
Crore
Factor Conditions Score
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 2567.6x - 97812
R² = 0.1431
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68
Source: MOSPI, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

48. SUB PILLARS OF FACTOR CONDITIONS - FINANCIAL CONDITIONS
GSDP
in
Rs.
Crore
Financial Conditions Score
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 5200.2x - 249158
R² = 0.7508
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
50 55 60 65 70 75
Source: MOSPI, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

49. SUB PILLARS OF FACTOR CONDITIONS - PHYSICAL CONDITIONS
Road
length
per
one
lakh
of
Population
Physical Conditions Score
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 35.814x - 1554.6
R² = 0.2546
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Source: MORTH, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

50. SUB PILLARS OF FACTOR CONDITIONS - COMMUNICATION CONDITIONS
Teledensity
Communication Conditions Score
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Delhi
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 0.8782x + 32.197
R² = 0.1157
0
50
100
150
200
250
45 55 65 75 85 95 105
Source: Ministry of Telecom , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

51. SUB PILLARS OF FACTOR CONDITIONS – ADMINSTRATION
Total
Number
of
Government
Hospitals
Administration Conditions Score
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Delhi
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 28.919x - 1185.1
R² = 0.1485
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Source: CBHI, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

52. SUB PILLARS OF FACTOR CONDITIONS - HUMAN CONDITIONS
Population
in
the
age
group
15-64
years
Human Conditions Score
Andhra Pradesh
Himachal Pradesh
Meghalaya
Nagaland
Uttar Pradesh
Gujarat
Arunachal Pradesh
Bihar
Kerala
Assam
West Bengal
Uttarakhand
Jharkhand
Goa
Tripura
Delhi
Punjab Manipur
Madhya Pradesh
Orissa
Rajasthan
Jammu & Kashmir
Tamil Nadu
Mizoram
Haryana
Maharashtra
Sikkim
Karnataka
Chhattisgarh
y = 2E+06x - 8E+07
R² = 0.4298
-20000000
0
20000000
40000000
60000000
80000000
100000000
120000000
140000000
40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
Source: Report on Population , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

53. SUB PILLAR OF FACTOR CONDITIONS- INNOVATION RATING
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal y = 0.0173x + 75.918
R² = 0.0005
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
Literacy
rate
Innovation Score
Source: Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

54. DEMAND CONDITIONS
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 1048.5x - 4544.3
R² = 0.2115
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Literacy
rate
Demand Conditions
Source: Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

55. SUB PILLAR OF DEMAND CONDITIONS- DEMOGRAPHY
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 1048.5x - 4544.3
R² = 0.2115
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Per
capita
GSDP
at
state
level
Demography
Source: MOSPI, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

56. SUB PILLAR OF DEMAND CONDITIONS- INCOME AND CONSUMPTION
Income Distribution
Total
number
of
households
Andhra
Arunachal
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal
J&K
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur Meghalaya
MizoramNagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 262293x - 5E+06
R² = 0.1434
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Source: Census 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

57. SUPPORTING CONDITIONS
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 2607.7x - 109845
R² = 0.6541
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
50 55 60 65 70 75 80
GSDP/
Capita
Supporting Conditions
Source: MOSPI, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

58. SUB PILLAR OF SUPPORTING CONDITIONS- DIVERSITY OF FIRMS
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 402.49x - 18291
R² = 0.2995
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Total
number
of
factories
Diversity of Firms Index
Source: ASI, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

59. SUB PILLAR OF SUPPORTING CONDITIONS - BUSINESS INCENTIVES
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Delhi
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 5370x - 224862
R² = 0.0461
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
Outstanding
Scheduled
commercial
bank
credit
Business Incentives
Source : RBI, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

60. STRATEGIC CONTEXT
GSDP
per
capita
Strategic context
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
45 50 55 60 65 70 75
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

61. SUB PILLARS OF STRATEGIC CONTEXT – SUPPLIER SOPHISTICATION
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Delhi
Bihar Chhattisgarh
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 20093x - 805345
R² = 0.2065
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1600000
45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Total
Number
of
Factory
Workers
Supplier sophistication
Source: ASI, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

62. SUB PILLAR OF STRATEGIC CONTEXT- INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
Institutional Support Index
Educational
Institutions
–
Universities
per
crore
of
population
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam Delhi
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 0.9806x - 49.264
R² = 0.6509
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Source: UGC, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

63. PROSPERITY AND COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 2486.4x - 105523
R² = 0.5172
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
45 50 55 60 65 70
Per
capita
State
Domestic
product
at
constant
price
2011
Microeconomic Competitiveness Scores

64. POLICE OFFICIALS VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 2830x - 116355
R² = 0.1227
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65
Number
of
Police
Officials
Microeconomic Competitiveness Scores

65. PORT INFRASTRUCTURE VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Goa
Gujarat
Kerala
Maharashtra
Orissa
Tamil Nadu
West Bengal
y = 0.2256x + 2.8145
R² = 0.0059
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Number
of
Ports
Microeconomic Competitiveness Score

66. NATIONAL HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 65.133x - 1354.6
R² = 0.0356
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
45 50 55 60 65 70
Length
of
Total
National
Highways,
In
Km
Microeconomic Competitiveness Score

67. AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 0.1168x - 4.2255
R² = 0.0985
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
45 50 55 60 65
Numbers
of
Domestic
Airports
Microeconomic Competitiveness Scores

68. TELEDENSITY VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 4.6503x - 210.87
R² = 0.3403
0
50
100
150
200
45 50 55 60 65 70
Teledensity
,
Phones
per
100
people
in
the
population
Microeconomic Competitiveness Scores

69. LITERACY RATES VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 0.2375x + 63.623
R² = 0.0231
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
45 50 55 60 65
Literacy
Rates
Microeconomic Competitiveness Score

70. EDUCATION VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal y = 89218x - 3E+06
R² = 0.0142
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
45 50 55 60 65
Students
enrolled
in
higher
secondary
classes
Millions
Microeconomic Competitiveness Score

71. RURAL TO URBAN LITERACY RATIO VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 0.305x + 67.336
R² = 0.0563
70.00
75.00
80.00
85.00
90.00
95.00
100.00
45 50 55 60 65 70
Ratio
of
Urban
to
rural
literacy
rates
in
percentage
terms
Microeconomic Competitiveness Score

72. GENDER DISPARITY (LITERACY) VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 0.0077x + 81.972
R² = 3E-05
60.00
65.00
70.00
75.00
80.00
85.00
90.00
95.00
100.00
45 50 55 60 65 70
Ratio
of
Female
Literacy
Rate
to
male
Literacy
rates
Microeconomic Competitiveness Score

73. 60746
60092
61318
63479
62281
54078
46050
40596
36773
33218
28157
22391
16693
11991
8910
6075
4469
54133
53394
57259
58248
55757
47877
42855
40164
36691
31993
26038
20447
15712
12406
10034
7017
5163
80000 60000 40000 20000 0 20000 40000 60000 80000
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80+
Population of males / females in Thousands in 2011
Age Pyramid for India in 2011
Males
Female
DEMOGRAPHICS OF INDIA 2011
Source: Census of India, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

74. 55328
58396
59500
59529
59176
60113
61859
60313
51965
43702
37704
32968
28268
22185
15820
9937
8412
49256
51790
52734
52739
52410
55998
56739
54219
46466
41361
38267
34124
28651
21982
15819
10644
11465
80000 60000 40000 20000 0 20000 40000 60000 80000
0-4
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80+
Projected Population of males / females in Thousands
Age Pyramid for India in 2026
Male
Female
DEMOGRAPHICS OF INDIA 2026
Source: Census of India, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

75. 45.05
51.97
49.71
57.45
39.96
48.40
51.12
46.91
50.27
55.35
45.97
45.23
60.18
48.85
44.57
48.47
46.62
60.51
43.07
66.11
56.39
44.58
42.49
45.14
47.67
48.40
34.81
43.16
41.24
42.87
43.11
47.13
43.46
45.96
48.37
42.72
42.23
43.43
41.77
46.67
43.78
55.02
47.88
42.35
80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0
Andhra Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chattisgarh
Delhi
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
NE States Excluding Assam
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
Dependence Ratios 2011 Dependence ratio 2026
Dependence ratio 2011 Dependence ratio 2026
OVERALL DEPENDENCE RATIO OF STATES
Source: Census of India, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

76. GOVERNMENT HOSPITALS VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 11.663x - 253.38
R² = 0.0169
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
45 50 55 60 65
Number
of
government
Hoispitals
Microeconomic Competitiveness Score

77. REGISTERED DOCTORS VERSUS COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 158.81x - 5888.7
R² = 0.1144
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
45 50 55 60 65 70
Total
number
of
registered
Allopathic
doctors
Microeconomic Competitiveness Scores

78. PER CAPITA REVENUUE EXPENDITURE ON MEDICAL, HEALTH AND EXPENDITURE
AND COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 6.6965x + 281.17
R² = 0.0049
0.00
500.00
1000.00
1500.00
2000.00
2500.00
45 50 55 60 65 70
Per
capita
revenue
expeniture
on
medical,
health
and
sanitation
Microeconomic Competitiveness Scores

79. HOUSEHOLDS AND COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya Mizoram
Nagaland
Delhi
Odisha
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 371146x - 1E+07
R² = 0.0453
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00
Number
of
Households
in
Millions
Microeconomic Competitiveness Score

80. AGRICULTURAL GSDP PER CAPITA AND COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 199.83x - 2794.9
R² = 0.0605
0.00
5000.00
10000.00
15000.00
20000.00
25000.00
45 50 55 60 65
Agricultural
GSDP
per
capita
in
Rupees
/Annum
Microeconomic Competitiveness Score

81. PER CAPITA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION AND COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 1.0472x - 48.11
R² = 0.2123
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
45 50 55 60 65
Per
caipita
consumption
of
Nitrogenous
fertilizers
in
Kg
per
annum
Microeconomic Competitiveness Score

82. MANUFACTURING AND COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 966.53x - 47032
R² = 0.2955
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
45 50 55 60 65
Manufacturing
GSDP
per
capita
in
Rupees
/Annum
Microeconomic Competitiveness Score

83. SERVICES AND COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Andhra Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Bihar
Chhattisgarh
Delhi
Goa
Gujarat
Haryana
Himachal Pradesh
Jammu and Kashmir
Jharkhand
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Orissa
Punjab
Rajasthan
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Tripura
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
West Bengal
y = 2177.7x - 97702
R² = 0.4637
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
45 50 55 60 65 70
Services
GSDP
per
capita
in
Rupees
/Annum
Microeconomic Competitiveness Score

84. 16.85
0.21 4.94
13.98
4.15 0.28
9.64
3.53 1.24 1.55 4.86
10.23
6.60
10.92
19.06
0.40 0.42 0.16 0.33
7.87
4.27
9.34
0.10
14.17
0.66
25.76
1.59
15.72
21.02
0.26
6.37
18.94
5.62 0.32
12.18
4.72 1.48 2.02
6.18
13.18
7.72
14.97
23.83
0.51 0.54 0.22 0.40
9.66
5.41
12.58
0.13
18.49
0.84
32.92
2.00
20.07
Households in India (in Millions) 2001 and 2011
67.2
54.7
24.9 10.3
53.1
93.6
80.4 82.9
94.8
80.7
24.3
78.6
70.2 70.0
77.5
60.0
42.7
69.6 63.6
26.9
91.9
54.7
77.8 78.2
41.8
31.9
60.3
37.5
92.2
65.7
37.1
16.4
75.3
96.9
90.4 90.5
96.8
85.1
45.8
90.6 94.4
67.1
83.9
68.4
60.9
84.2 81.6
43
96.6
67
92.5 93.4
68.4
36.8
87
54.5
Percentage of Households in India 2001 and 2011 having electricity
Percentage of Households having electricity in India 2001 Percentage of Households having electricity in India 2011
HOUSEHOLDS IN INDIA
Source: Census of India,2011 Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

85. ACCESS TO WATER
63.9
89.5
51
68.2 68.8
40.6
27.3
4.4
85.3
65.5
47.2
38.6
58.7
33.2
39.3
10.5
25.4
12.9 13.8
20.7
23.4
69 67.9
69.9
66.1
85.4
29.3
79.8
6.5
2.9
0.5
1.1
3
10.8
4
4.3
0.6
5.7
25.7
7.5
4.7
27.4
25.4
18.9
6
36.5
19.5
11.4
20
7.1
14.4
6.4
9
11.1
62
5.1
11.4
3.6
24.7
22
12
25.3 64.9
86.6
0
10.7
2.2
6.5
0.8
18.1
2.8
50.2
50.1
43.8
41.5
58.4
47.1
11.6
9.9
13.7
5.5
0.1
0.5
4.6
1.5
0.7
21.9
2
12.9
12.2
2.9
3
0
2.4
4.5
0.4
0.9
16.3
2.6
9.2
16.7
3.5
20
7.2 7.6
9.6
5.7
6.9
16
0.3 3.7 8.2
16.7
3.4 2
6.7
3.1
11.1
0.9 1.7
14.1
15.8
20.6
47.2
34.8
5.1
29.9
11.3
1.8 3.4 5.2
2.3 2 2.6 2.2 3.2 3.5
3.2
4.4 2.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage
by
source
of
households
Tap water Well Handpump Tubewell Tank, Pond, Lake, River, Spring, Canal and any other source
Source: Census of India,2011 Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

86. Gujarat
25%
Maharashtra
21%
Tamil Nadu
9%
Karnataka
5%
Andhra Pradesh
5%
Haryana
3%
Uttar Pradesh
3%
West Bengal
3%
Odisha
3%
Kerala
3%
Delhi
2%
Rajasthan
2%
Punjab
2%
Madhya
Pradesh
1%
Goa
1%
Rest of the
states
11%
Share of Exports from various states in 2010-11
40272
44667
18540
12296 9897 4792 7571 5583
3351 4753
38775
43356
16085
9093
8559
5679
5524
4197
3230
5843
61694
53788
23378
13603
12567
8584
8208
7111 6990
6547
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
Exports
in
Millions
of
Dollars
Value of Exports from various states
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
EXPORT COMPETITIVENESS
Source: Economic Survey of India 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

87. COUNTRY EQUIVALENTS
Source: EIU 2011, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
BAHA
MAS
CUBA

88. Punjab
Uttar Pradesh
Haryana
Madhya Pradesh
Bihar
Rajasthan
Maharashtra
Gujarat
Jammu and Kashmir
Uttarakhand
Andhra Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Karnataka
Odisha
West Bengal
Kerala
Chhattisgarh
Jharkhand
Himachal Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Manipur
Mizoram
Meghalaya
Nagaland
Sikkim
Delhi
Goa
China
Pakistan
Arabian Sea
Bay of Bengal
Indian Ocean
Sri Lanka
Nepal
Tripura
24.6
21.4
9.3
5.4
5.0
3.4
3.3
2.8
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.1
1.6
1.2
0.7
EXPORTS FROM THE TOP 15 STATES PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

89. Punjab
Uttar Pradesh
Haryana
Madhya Pradesh
Bihar
Rajasthan
Maharashtra
Gujarat
Jammu and Kashmir
Uttarakhand
Andhra Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Karnataka
Odisha
West Bengal
Kerala
Chhattisgarh
Jharkhand
Himachal Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Manipur
Mizoram
Meghalaya
Nagaland
Sikkim
Delhi
Goa
China
Pakistan
Arabian Sea
Bay of Bengal
Indian Ocean
Sri Lanka
Nepal
Tripura
3
1
35
40
15
22
18
11
36
4
100
52
33
108
88
74
33
21
2
67
31
7
88
7
2
0
0
0
0
NUMBER OF PPP PROJECTS IN INDIA
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

90. Punjab
Uttar Pradesh
Haryana
Madhya Pradesh
Bihar
Rajasthan
Maharashtra
Gujarat
Jammu and Kashmir
Uttarakhand
Andhra Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Karnataka
Odisha
West Bengal
Kerala
Chhattisgarh
Jharkhand
Himachal Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Manipur
Mizoram
Meghalaya
Nagaland
Sikkim
Delhi
Goa
China
Pakistan
Arabian Sea
Bay of Bengal
Indian Ocean
Sri Lanka
Nepal
Tripura
1.04
0.57
2.29
2.09
16.49
5.67
1.38
0.84
8.58
3.47
7.55
2.58
0.24
0.30
0.09
0.22
0.16
0.11
2.72
4.99
9.29
0.12
6.00
2.11
7.00
5.05
2.76
5.96
POPULATION PERCENTAGES IN STATES
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

91. Punjab
Uttar Pradesh
Haryana
Madhya Pradesh
Bihar
Rajasthan
Maharashtra
Gujarat
Jammu and Kashmir
Uttarakhand
Andhra Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Karnataka
Odisha
West Bengal
Kerala
Chhattisgarh
Jharkhand
Himachal Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh
Assam
Manipur
Mizoram
Meghalaya
Nagaland
Sikkim
Delhi
Goa
China
Pakistan
Arabian Sea
Bay of Bengal
Indian Ocean
Sri Lanka
Nepal
Tripura
1788
1652
1056
945
941
933
872
821
801
713
698
669
650
615
571
553
544
534
529
494
487
474
404
396
394
378
377
320
254
All the figures are in dollars, The exchange rate taken for arriving at the figures was 1 US$ = 49 Rupees
PROSPERITY IN INDIA
Source: Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

92. STATE OF INDUSTRIES
Jammu & Kashmir
Himachal Pradesh
Punjab
Haryana
Uttar Pradesh
Rajasthan
Delhi
Uttarakhand
Bihar
Orissa
West Bengal
Assam
Meghalaya
Tripura
Mizoram
Manipur
Nagaland
Arunachal Pradesh
Sikkim
Jharkhand
Gujarat Maharashtra
Goa
Madhya Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Kerala
Tamil Nadu
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000
Contribution in Rs Crores
All India Average of
18,54,826 people
employed/ state
All
India
All India Average
23816.62 Crores
Source: MSME , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

93. CONTRIBUTION PER PERSON IN INDUSTRIES
3.79 3.88
3.56
3.34
1.41
1.77
0.30
2.96
0.36
0.76
0.51 0.55
0.43 0.35
1.37
0.14
1.98
0.62
0.20
0.62
1.26
1.72
5.75
2.27
0.76
0.25
1.20
0.81
2.76
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
Contribution
in
Lakhs
of
Rupees
Average
Contribution of
1.57
Lakhs/Person
Source: MSME 4th round , Institute for Competitiveness Analysis

94. PER UNIT EMPLOYMENT VERSUS PER UNIT GROSS OUTPUT
Source: MSME 4th round, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
Manufacturing
Services
Per unit employment (Person)
Per unit Gross Output (in Lakhs of
Rupees)
Manufacturing Services
Per unit employment (Person) 4.68 1.91
Per unit Gross Output (in Lakhs of Rupees) 85.22 3.75
Per unit revenues/ per unit employment 18.21 1.96

95. MARKET VALUE VERSUS ORIGINAL VALUE OF PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Source: MSME fourth round, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
0.00
500.00
1000.00
1500.00
2000.00
2500.00
3000.00
3500.00
4000.00
Manufacturing
Services
Market value of Fixed Investments in Crores of
Rupees
Original value of Plant and Machinery/ Equipment
in Crores of Rupees
Manufacturing Services
Market value of Fixed Investments in Crores of Rupees 3800.08 219.29
Original value of Plant and Machinery/ Equipment in Crores of Rupees 1010.55 59.60
No of times valued by the market 3.76 3.68

96. Source: ASI 2008-09, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Top 7 types of Industries in the state
7-14 types of Industries in the state
15-21 types of Industries in the state
21-28 types of Industries in state
STATE OF CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT: TOTAL NUMBER OF FACTORIES
Mining
Textiles
Apparels
and related
industries
Publishing
and
Printing
Glass and
related
industries
Footwear
Lighting
Electric
equipment
Minerals
Tobacco
Automotiv
e
Oil and Gas
Medical
equipment
Furniture
Other
transportat
ion
Leather
industries
Wood and
Forest
Products
Rubber and
Plastic
Industries
Television
and allied
electronic
industries
Processed
food
Chemicals
Pulp and
Paper
Agricultural
Products
Agricultural
services
Other
Service
Industries
Machinery
and
Equipment
Metals
Domestic
and electric
Industries
Production

97. STATE OF CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT: TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
Top 7 types of Industries in the state
7-14 types of Industries in the state
15-21 types of Industries in the state
21-28 types of Industries in state
Source: ASI 2008-09, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
Mining
Textiles
Apparels
and related
industries
Publishing
and
Printing
Glass and
related
industries
Footwear
Lighting
Electric
equipment
Minerals
Tobacco
Automotiv
e
Oil and Gas
Medical
equipment
Furniture
Other
transportat
ion
Leather
industries
Wood and
Forest
Products
Rubber and
Plastic
Industries
Television
and allied
electronic
industries
Processed
food
Chemicals
Pulp and
Paper
Agricultural
Products
Agricultural
services
Other
Service
Industries
Machinery
and
Equipment
Metals
Domestic
and electric
Industries
Production

98. STATE OF CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT: TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE
Source: ASI 2008-09, Institute for Competitiveness Analysis
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Agriculture services
Television and allied electronic industries
Agriculture Products
Lighting and electric equipment
Leather Industries
Wood and forest Products
Footwear
Production
Printing and Publishing
Food Processing
Automotive
Mining
Glass Industries
Other transportation
Chemical
Medical
Domestic and electric industries
Pulp and Paper
Metals
Minerals
Oil and Gas
Other service industries
Tobacco
Furniture
Machinery and equipment
Textiles
Rubber and Plastic Industries
Apparels and related Industries
21396
11627
11327
10878
6330
4881
3565
3051
2770
2480
1575
1368
1363
1097
932
756
730
628
469
469
390
178
107
74
0
0
0
0

99. CREATING A STATE ECONOMIC STRATEGY
State Value Proposition
Achieving and Maintaining parity
with peers
Developing Unique Strengths
What are the main strengths, positive attributes, location
advantage etc of the particular state in question.
• How can the state leverage on its
unique capabilities and create new
ones?
• Which businesses/ clusters can be
made stronger?
• What are the key weaknesses
which need to be taken care of
while forming maintaining parity
with peers?
State economic strategy requires setting clear priorities and measuring against
predefined criteria.

100. COMPETITION AMONG STATES
Tactical (Zero Sum
Competition)
Strategic (Positive
Sum Competition)
• Focus on FDI investments
• Compete in every domain
• Offer tax benefits across the
spectrum
• Provide subsidies to lower / offset
business costs
• Every city and sub-region for itself
• Government is responsible for
development of cluster.
• Focus on domestic and existing
companies
• Compete in specialized cluster domains
• Government incentives and support for
training, infrastructure, and institutions
• Improve the efficiency of doing
business
• Economies of scale to help benefit from
multiple geographies
• Government and the private sector
collaborate to build cluster strength
Source: Michael E Porter

101. HOW SHOULD STATES COMPETE WITH EACH OTHER
Old Model New Model
Competitiveness is the result of both top-down and bottom-up processes in
which many companies and institutions take responsibility
• Government drives economic
development through policy
decisions and incentives
• Economic development is a
collaborative process involving
government at multiple levels,
companies, teaching and
research institutions, and private
sector organizations
Source: Michael E Porter

102. COMPETITION AMONG STATES
• The purpose of a sound economic policy is to increase the overall prosperity in
the state and for that the states should focus on increasing their competitiveness.
• Improvements and productivity and technological advancement are the guiding
principles in this regard.
• Competitiveness requires a fundamental rethinking of usage of your existing
resources.
• For government has to fundamentally rethink its role, it should try to foster a spirit
of entrepreneurship in the private sector.
• The criteria for judging the merits and demerits of an economic policy should be
by outcomes and not political philosophy.
• The prosperity of India will depend largely on the states and not just the (Center)
Delhi.

103. INTERPRETATION CHARTS
Top 33.33% of the
states
33.33%-66.67% of
the states
66.67% to 100% of
the states
• The snapshot chart summarizes the relative performance of a state on levels and trends in 5 key
measures. The circles in the chart show the measurement of the chart legend.
• Prosperity: State GDP per capita and 10 year trend.
• Productivity: Average Private wage and 10 year trend.
• Labour Mobilization: Total labour force as a share of civilian population and 10 year trend.
• Clusters: Total number of people employed in the cluster and total number of enterprises in the cluster.
• Type of Economy: Factor Driven economies, Changeover economies, Investment driven economies,
Transition economies, Innovation driven economies and city state economies.
Position Trend
Prosperity
Productivity
Labour Mobilization
State of Clusters
Leading Clusters
Agricultural Products
Domestic and Electric Industries
Wood and forest products
Type of Economy Investment Driven

104. Top 7 types of Industries in the state
7-14 types of Industries in the state
15-21 types of Industries in the state
21-28 types of Industries in the state
The Chart represents the number
of factories in various types of
Industries in state.
The position of the various types
of factories shows relative
proximity in terms of type of
Industry. Thus, Chemical is placed
next to Oil and gas, etc.
The colour coding is done to
show the importance of factory
sector in terms of number of
enterprises in the state. Thus
yellow shows the maximum
number of industries in the state.
STATE OF CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT : FACTORIES
Mining
Textiles
Apparels
and
related
industries
Publishing
and
Printing
Glass and
related
industries
Footwear
Lighting
Electric
equipmen
t
Minerals
Tobacco
Automoti
ve
Oil and
Gas
Medical
equipmen
t
Furniture
Other
transport
ation
Leather
industries
Wood
and
Forest
Products
Rubber
and
Plastic
Industries
Television
and allied
electronic
industries
Processed
food
Chemicals
Pulp and
Paper
Agricultur
al
Products
Agricultur
al
services
Other
Service
Industries
Machiner
y and
Equipmen
t
Metals
Domestic
and
electric
Industries
Productio
n

105. Top 7 ranked types of Factories in the state
7-14 ranked types of Factories in the state
15-21 ranked types of Factories in the state
21-28 ranked types of Factories in the state
The Chart represents the number of
Employees in various types of
Industries in state.
The position of the various types of
industries shows relative proximity
in terms of type of Industry. Thus,
Chemical is placed next to Oil and
gas. etc.
The colour coding is done to show
the importance of Industries in
terms of number of employees in
the state. Thus yellow shows the
bracket of maximum number of
employees in the state.
STATE OF CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT : EMPLOYEES
Mining
Textiles
Apparels
and related
industries
Publishing
and
Printing
Glass and
related
industries
Footwear
Lighting
Electric
equipment
Minerals
Tobacco
Automotive
Oil and Gas
Medical
equipment
Furniture
Other
transportat
ion
Leather
industries
Wood and
Forest
Products
Rubber and
Plastic
Industries
Television
and allied
electronic
industries
Processed
food
Chemicals
Pulp and
Paper
Agricultural
Products
Agricultural
services
Other
Service
Industries
Machinery
and
Equipment
Metals
Domestic
and electric
Industries
Production

106. • The economy has been looked at from the primary, secondary and tertiary Perspective. These sectors
are then looked in detail to find the contribution of each sub sector to the three primary sectors namely
Agriculture, Industry and Services.
• The result is a bubble chart which shows the contribution of each sub sector to the economy.
• The size of the bubble represents the size of the GSDP contribution in Rs. Crores.
Strong and
Growing Position
Cluster is growing
faster than Indian
Average
The regions share of
cluster GSDP relative to
its size
COMPONENTS OF REGIONAL ECONOMIES
Uttarakhand/National
GSDP
share
(Percent)
,2011
Change in contribution of GSDP of Uttarakhand to total Indian GSDP, CAGR (2000-2011)
Agricuture
Banking and insurance
Communication
Construction
Electricity, gas and water
supply
Fishing
Forestry and logging
Manufacturing
Mining and quarrying
Other services
Public administration and
defence
Railways
Real states, ownership of
dwellings and business
services
Storage
Trade, hotel and restaurant
Transport by other means
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30

107. • Clusters are geographically proximate
groups of interconnected companies and
associated institutions in a particular field.
Examples include chemical and
pharmaceutical clusters in Gujarat and
apparel and diamond cluster in Surat.
Clusters and sub clusters taken for the study
are taken at the end of this report.
• Employment by cluster gives a more
detailed profile of the activities in the state
economy that make up the Job Base. It can
be used to understand the importance of
the health of various groups of Industries on
the overall prosperity of the region.
EMPLOYMENT BY A CLUSTER
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Agriculture services
Television and allied electronic industries
Agriculture Products
Lighting and electric equipment
Leather Industries
Wood and forest Products
Footwear
Production
Printing and Publishing
Food Processing
Automotive
Mining
Glass Industries
Other transportation
Chemical
Medical
Domestic and electric industries
Pulp and Paper
Metals
Minerals
Oil and Gas
Other service industries
Tobacco
Furniture
Machinery and equipment
Textiles
Rubber and Plastic Industries
Apparels and related Industries
21396
11627
11327
10878
6330
4881
3565
3051
2770
2480
1575
1368
1363
1097
932
756
730
628
469
469
390
178
107
74
0
0
0
0

108. • The political boundaries of a state often encompass many distinct regional economies or portions of
large regional economies. A comprehensive approach to economic development should reflect both
the distinct economies within the state as well as strong linkages to the economies in the neighboring
states. In addition to this clusters should be mapped on areas of high economic growth. This will lead
to spillover effects in the long run.
• A state's or region’s economy can be divided
into 3 components namely
1. Primary/Agriculture sector
2. Secondary/Industry sector
3. Tertiary/Service sector
In this report we focus more on Industrial sector to bring out its components in detail.
GSDP
in
Rs.
Crore
A BRIEF NOTE OF THE REGIONS AND OVERALL ECONOMY OF UTTARAKHAND
7062 15007 21503
924340
1492375
2549085
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
Agriculture, forestry
and fishing
Industry Services

109. Agricultural products
• Grain mill products, starches & starch products
and prepared animal foods
• Other food products
• Beverages
Apparels and related industries
• Knitted and crocheted fabrics and articles
• Wearing apparel; dressing and dyeing of fur
• Wearing apparel, except fur apparel
Agricultural services
• Agriculture, hunting, and related services activities
Automotive
• Bodies (coach work) for motor
vehicles
• Parts and accessories for
motor vehicles & their engines
Chemicals
• Basic chemicals
Domestic and electric Industries
• Domestic appliances
• Office, accounting and computing machinery
• Electrical machinery and apparatus
• Electric motors, generators and transformers
• Electricity distribution and control apparatus
Footwear
• Footwear
Furniture
• Furniture
Glass and related industries
• Glass and glass products
Leather industries
• Tanning & dressing of leather; luggage, handbags
Medical equipment
• Medical, precision and optical
instruments, watches & clocks
Metals
• Basic Iron & Steel
• Basic precious and non-ferrous metals
• Casting of metals
Lighting electric equipment
• Insulated wire and cable
• Accumulators, primary cells and primary batteries
• Electric lamps and lighting equipment
• Other electrical equipment
Minerals
• Minerals
Machinery and equipment
• Structural metal products, tanks, reservoirs
• Other fabricated metal products
• Machinery and equipment
• General purpose machinery
• Special purpose machinery
Other service industries
• Other Service Industries
Mining
• Mining and quarrying
Processed food
• Manufacture of food products and beverages
• Meat, fish, fruit vegetables, oils and fats
• Dairy product
Publishing and printing
• Publishing
• Printing and service activities related to printing
Rubber and plastic industries
• Rubber products
• Plastic products
Production
• Manufacturing
Pulp and Paper
• Pulp and Paper Industries
Wood and forest products
• Wood and of products
• Saw milling and planning of wood
• Products of wood, cork, straw and plaiting materials
Textiles
• Spinning, weaving and finishing of textiles
• Other textiles
Oil and gas
• Coke oven products
• Refined petroleum products
Tobacco
• Tobacco products
Television and allied electronic industries
• Electronic valves and tubes
and other electronic components
• Television and radio transmitters
and apparatus
• Television and radio receivers
Other transportation
• Other transport equipment
• Railway and tramway locomotives and rolling stock
• Transport equipment
CLUSTERS AND SUB CLUSTERS IN THE INDIAN ECONOMY