1. DR. ALI WAQAR HASAN
FCPS-II TRAINEE ORTHODONTICS
UCMD LAHORE
SUPERVISED BY : DR. SAAD ASAD
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF ORTHODONTICS
UCMD LAHORE
2. INTRODUCTION
Ackerman and Profitt presented
their system in 1960
It was proposed to overcome the
drawbacks of Angle’s
classification
This system includes Angle’s
classification & five
characteristics of malocclusion
within a Venn diagram
3. SALIENT FEATURES
Transverse and vertical
discrepancies can be considered in
addition to antero-posterior
malrelations
Crowding and Arch asymmetry can
be evaluated
Incisor protrusion is taken into
account
11. ESTHETIC LINE OF OCCLUSION
In modern analysis,
another curved line
characterizing the
appearance of the
dentition is important
Esthetic line of
occlusion, follows the
facial edges of the
maxillary anterior and
posterior teeth.
12. ROTATIONAL AXES
In addition to relationship in the transverse, antero-
posterior and vertical planes of space used in traditional 3-
D analysis, rotations around axes perpendicular to three
planes also must be evaluated
It’s a useful way to evaluate the relationship of the teeth to
the soft tissues that frame their display
Pitch
Roll
Yaw
13. PITCH
The vertical relationship of the teeth to the lips
& cheeks can be conventionally described as up-
down deviations around the antero-posterior
axes.
Evaluated clinically & from cephalometric
radiographs.
ROLL
Roll describes the vertical position of the teeth
when this is different on the right & left sides.
Viewed as up-down deviations around the
transverse axes.
It’s seen with lips relaxed and more clearly on
smile, in both frontal and oblique views.
YAW
Rotation of the jaw or dentition to one side or
the other, around a vertical axes, produces a
skeletal or dental midline discrepancy.
Viewed as left-right deviations around the
vertical axis.
15. METHOD OF SCORING
0- Ideal
1- Slight
2- Slight to Moderate
3- Moderate
4- Moderate to Severe
5- Severe