Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Pet 735 presentation comprehensive school physical activity
Similar to Pet 735 presentation comprehensive school physical activity (20)
More from ajkeath
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Pet 735 presentation comprehensive school physical activity
- 1. Erwin, H., Beighle, A., Carson, R.L., & Castelli, D. M. (2013). Comprehensive School-Based Physical Activity Promotion: A Review, Quest, 65, 4, 412-428. Annie Machamer Adem Keath
- 2. Type – Purpose - Background • Type: Review • Physical Activity levels = Still Low, so strategies to increase PA are necessary • CSPAP / Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program • Purpose: To provide a review of CSPAP components, propose the potential interventions that can increase PA levels, and provide future directions for CSPAP research.
- 3. Background & Significance • CSPAP Goal: to develop a school culture conducive to promoting lifelong PA across five integral components, each serving a plausible point of intervention. (pg. 412) • Other school based interventions = BMI level changes • Needed is PA opportunities offered in multiple locations throughout the school building, and during and beyond school day! • CSPAP provides more PA opportunities, and includes students social influences.
- 5. Components of CSPAP • Physical Education – QPE, opportunities to learn, meaningful content, appropriate instruction. • Physical Activity During School – Classroom PA, Recess/Drop-ins • Physical Activity Before & After School – BASP, active commute • Staff Involvement – Role models, organizing & helping, implementing • Family & Community Engagement – Involvement of student influences
- 6. Analysis Methods • Literature review – Each review done for each of the specific components. • Meta-analysis – School based intervention effects were relatively low.
- 7. Main Argument • Comprehensive school physical activity is reliant on multiple factors. – Just having a good PE program is not enough. • When considering the increases as a sum of each component that is when results are realized.
- 8. Conclusions • There is no one stop shop fix for physical activity in schools. • Physical activity programs continue to rely on: • Teacher collaboration- Active academics, brain breaks, recess. • Administrative support- Employee wellness programs • 3rd party support- Youth sports, before and after school programs. • Parental involvement- Physical activity night, PA homework.
- 9. Questions? • Thinking about your school physical activity experiences, how were these components met or not met in your experience? • What could be some challenges in implementing a CSPAP, and how could you overcome them? • How does this relate to other articles we have discussed?
- 10. Takeaways • Adam- Often as a PE teacher you feel responsible for every students PA, but the PE teacher is just a part of the puzzle. • Annie – Reaching the whole child and their surroundings. Role Models and Repetition!
Editor's Notes
- -Physical activity levels among youth remain well below national recommendations, so therefore a variety of strategies have been developed to increase students PA levels. -Multifaceted school based approaches -CSPAP is one of the programs developed to help students reach 60 minutes of physical activity a day.
- MVPA, development, assessment Classroom activity breaks, social outside the classroom, Before & after school no test scores, active walking to school, sport participation Staff helping with CSPAP, being role models and implementing PA Activities, events, input in the community and home influence the models of our students.