SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 53
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
De-risking Alternatives for Plan Sponsors –
Compliance Requirements
April 16, 2015
Presented by:
Michael Falk, Erin Kartheiser, and Steve Flores
Today’s eLunch Presenters
Michael Falk
Partner, Employee Benefits
Chicago
MFalk@winston.com
Steve Flores
Associate, Employee Benefits
Chicago
SAflores@winston.com
Erin Kartheiser
Partner, Employee Benefits
Chicago
EKarthei@winston.com
2
Overview
 Trends in Pension Plan De-risking
 In-Plan Investment Strategies
 Lump Sum Windows and Annuitization
 Benefit Accrual and Plan Freeze
 Plan Spin-Offs and Terminations
 Additional Considerations
3
Trends in Pension Plan De-risking
De-risking Trends
• History:
• The concept of de-risking is only a few years old
• In 2012, Ford Motor Company offered a lump sum window to
retirees and former employees
• Later that same year, General Motors and Verizon conducted
annuity buy-outs
• These actions removed billions of dollars in pension obligations
from the companies’ books
• Countless companies have since engaged in de-risking
activities
5
De-risking Trends
• De-risking trend is expected to continue
• However, the climate may become less favorable to de-risking
in future years
• New mortality tables
• Increased regulation and disclosure of de-risking activities
• Market slowdown
6
De-risking Trends
• New Mortality Tables
• Society of Actuaries put out new mortality tables for defined
benefit pension plans in 2014
• These tables are expected to cause a significant increase in
employers’ funding obligations
• Increased plan asset levels and ever-increasing PBGC
premiums are other factors that will continue to make de-
risking attractive
7
De-risking Trends
• De-risking regulatory initiatives
• PBGC now requires plan sponsors to report de-risking
information
• Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) recommends that
plan sponsors report to the DOL regarding de-risking
transactions, and provide detailed participant disclosures
• GAO also recommends rules concerning interest rates used
for lump sum valuations, and timelines for adopting updated
mortality tables
8
De-risking Trends
• De-risking regulatory initiatives
• Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans
recommendations
• Enhanced fiduciary standards
• Enhanced participant disclosures
• Include information regarding potential tax penalties, whether
an early retirement or other subsidy is included in the
calculation of the lump sum distribution, and a comparison of a
lump sum distribution to the benefit otherwise payable
• Disclosures are likely to become more onerous
• Possible restrictions surrounding interest rates and mortality tables
9
In-Plan Investment Strategies
In-Plan Investments
• Pension Buy-Ins
• Plan sponsor pays premium to an insurer
• Insurer pays income stream to the plan
• Income stream matches the pension benefits being paid out
• Pensioners continue to be plan participants
• Does not remove liabilities from the plan
• Insures a portion of the plan’s liabilities
• Removes risk of market volatility for the applicable portion of the
assets
11
In-Plan Investments
• Pension Buy-Ins
• Advantages
• No settlement charge
• No additional funding required
• Disadvantages
• PBGC premiums and administrative costs do not decrease
12
In-Plan Investments
• Fiduciary Responsibilities
• Loyalty
• Prudence
• Exclusive Benefit of Plan Participants
• Administer the Plan in Accordance With Its Terms
• Others
13
In-Plan Investments
• Liability-Driven Investing (“LDI”)
• Investing the plan’s assets to close its funding gap
• Focuses on matching the plan’s assets to its liabilities
• Various methods available
• Review and revise Investment Policy Statement
• Conduct due diligence to select an investment manager
14
In-Plan Investments
• Liability-Driven Investing (“LDI”)
• Important considerations
• Will the plan terminate?
• Will the plan become frozen to participants or accruals?
• What is the plan’s funding goals?
• How much volatility is acceptable?
15
In-Plan Investments
• Liability-Driven Investing (“LDI”)
• Consider current funded status of the plan
• Well-funded plans may focus on minimizing funded status volatility
and preserving current funding level
• Defined benefit plans have unique characteristics as compared to
other investors
• LDI takes interest rate into account
• Devise LDI strategy using plan’s predicted cash flow needs
16
In-Plan Investments
• Liability-Driven Investing (“LDI”)
• The goal is to pay for all of the plan’s current and future liabilities
• Matches the plan’s liabilities with assets of same duration (“immunization”)
• Example: An LDI strategy might focus on matching the duration of the plan’s
liabilities and the bonds in the portfolio. If long-duration bond prices
decrease due to interest rate increases, the liabilities of the plan should also
decrease
17
In-Plan Investments
• Hedging
• Investing to offset negative events
• Used to mitigate funding volatility
• Goal is to reduce risk, not maximize gains
18
In-Plan Investments
• Liability-Driven Investing Disadvantages
• “Locks in” funded status—and that’s not always a good thing
• Loss of opportunity to benefit from a rising market
19
Lump Sum Windows and Annuitization
Lump Sum Windows and Annuities
• Short of terminating a plan, sponsors can reduce liabilities and
volatility by offering lump sum cash settlements or insurer
provided annuities
22
Lump Sum Windows
• A plan may offer lump sums to participants who are eligible
to receive distributions
• The decision to offer lump sums is settlor in nature and not
subject to fiduciary requirements
• However, the implementation of this strategy is fiduciary in
nature subject to ERISA fiduciary rules
23
Lump Sum Windows
• Important considerations:
• Whether to make the availability of the lump sum temporary or
permanent
• What parameters to affix to the lump sum window
• Who will be eligible for the window?
• Terminated vested participants
• Retirees in pay status
• Updates to mortality tables
• Plan funded status
• Administrative costs and burdens
24
Lump Sum Windows
• Notice and Consent Requirements
• For the lump sum election to be effective, the plan sponsor
must provide notice of:
• The financial effect and relative value of optional forms of
benefits
• Rollover rights
• Right to defer benefit commencement
• Must obtain consent to distribute
• May need to obtain spousal consent
• Don’t forget about QDROs
25
Lump Sum Windows
• Government Accountability Office Report on Private Pensions
makes the following recommendations:
• Improved oversight by requiring plan sponsors to alert DOL when they
implement lump sum windows
• Coordinate with Treasury to clarify guidance on information plan sponsors
provide to participants
• Treasury should reassess regulations governing relative value statements,
as well as interest rates and mortality tables used in calculating lump sums
26
Lump Sum Windows
• Potential for litigation?
• Adams v. Sun Company
• Plan sponsor amended plan to offer lump sum window of annuities to
terminated vested participants
• Participant materials indicated that the window was a “one time” opportunity
• In connection with a sale of the plan sponsor, a second opportunity for a
lump sum was provided
• Between the first and the second window, interest rates fell, resulting in
larger lump sums for the second group
• The participants in the first group sued for breach of fiduciary duty under
ERISA for failing to disclose that a second window would occur when the
first window was communicated
27
Annuitization
• Instead of and/or in addition to providing lump sums, an
employer may also purchase an annuity contract
• The annuity provider is then responsible for paying
participants
• The decision to offer annuity contracts is settlor in nature
and not subject to fiduciary requirements
• However, the selection of annuity providers is a fiduciary
act that must be taken with the utmost care
28
Annuitization
• Full risk transfer—can take the form of a pension buyout where
a plan sponsor transfers all risk to an insurance company in
exchange for a lump sum payment. Typically seen in plan
terminations
• Partial risk transfer—can also take target-specific liabilities
29
Annuitization
• The selection of an annuity provider is a fiduciary function
• Under Interpretive Bulletin 95-1, fiduciaries must consider
the following factors when selecting the “safest available
annuity”:
• the quality and diversification of the insurer’s investment portfolio;
• the size of the insurer relative to the proposed annuity contract;
• the level of the insurer’s capital and surplus;
• the lines of business of the insurer and other indications of an insurer’s
exposure to liability;
• the structure of the annuity contract and guarantees supporting the
annuities, such as the use of insurance company separate accounts; and
• the availability of additional protection through state guaranty associations
and the extent of the guarantees
30
Annuitization
• Plan sponsor may use an independent fiduciary to avoid
conflicts of interest when the same individuals act in corporate
and fiduciary capacities
• An independent fiduciary can
• Advise the fiduciaries charged with selecting the annuity
• Be the final decision-maker on the annuity provider
31
Annuitization
• Plan sponsor must make sure that all documentation during
annuity selection process clearly reflects the differences
between fiduciary and non-fiduciary activities
• Plan sponsors must ensure that any actions taken are
permitted/reflected in plan documents and procedures
• Critical to have clear delegation of authority for all actions taken
• Follow plan documents, charters, and policies
32
Annuitization
• Pros: The plan sponsor is no longer required to pay PBGC
premiums and funding risks and liabilities related to participants
are eliminated
• Cons: Risk of potential liability for fiduciaries who select annuity
provider
33
Annuitization
• Potential for Litigation?
• Lee v. Verizon actions
• Through the purchase of a group annuity contract Verizon
transferred significant pension liabilities to the Prudential
Insurance Company of America
• In first action, participants sought declaratory and injunctive relief
to prevent purchase of the group annuity contract arguing that:
• Plan sponsor failed to disclose in SPD that it retained the right to
transfer pension obligations to an insurance provider
• Plan sponsor breached fiduciary duties
• Plan sponsor discriminated against affected retirees
34
Annuitization
• In the second action, a new set of claims by participants whose
benefits were not annuitized alleged that plan sponsor breached
fiduciary duties and depleted the plan’s assets by paying an
excessive and unreasonable amount of expenses to complete
the annuity transaction
• The district court allowed the participants to amend their
pleadings
• District court has ruled against the plaintiffs
• Currently pending before the Fifth Circuit
35
Benefit Accrual and Plan Freeze
Change Benefit Accrual Rules
• An employer can amend a plan to reduce future benefit accruals
• Change benefit formula
• Move to a cash balance plan arrangement
• Freeze the plan
• Make sure the amendment does not cut back benefits
• Follow plan procedures
• Notify participants of the change
37
Plan Freeze
• Plan Freeze. A plan may be amended to freeze as to
participation (“soft freeze”) and/or benefit accruals (“hard
freeze”)
• The decision to freeze a plan is settlor in nature and not subject
to fiduciary requirements. However, the implementation of this
strategy is fiduciary in nature subject to ERISA fiduciary rules
38
Plan Freeze
• Implementation:
• Advance notice of reduction of future benefit accruals must be
provided to participants, beneficiaries, alternate payees, and
union representatives
• Notice must be provided at least 45 days before plan
amendment is effective (15 days for plans with fewer than 100
participants)
• Plan document must be amended—make sure proper
procedures are followed!
• May create issues under IRC nondiscrimination rules
• IRS has provided limited relief in this area
39
Plan Freeze
• Pros: Reduces long-term costs and volatility by ceasing benefit
accruals
• Cons: The plan sponsor continues to pay PBGC premiums,
continues to assume the risk for all participants, and maintains
the administrative burdens associated with maintaining a plan
40
Plan Spin-Off and Termination
Plan Spin-Off and Termination
• Whereas annuitization of retirees is a “lift-out” (see Verizon),
another approach is to break the defined benefit plan into two
plans (see GM and Motorola Solutions)
• A plan sponsor may spin-off a portion of the plan, thus creating
two plans. Then one plan continues on (and perhaps further de-
risks) while the other plan is terminated
• May reduce litigation risk, as more law exists as to how plan
assets are allocated between the two plans
• If a plan is not fully funded (most plans), assets are allocated among priority
categories
42
Plan Spin-Off and Termination
• The decision to spin off and terminate a portion of the plan is
settlor in nature and not subject to fiduciary requirements.
However, the implementation of this strategy is fiduciary in
nature subject to the aforementioned rules
• From an HR perspective, retirees will improve position with
benefits now backed by a highly rated and regulated insurer,
while remaining participants will benefit from smaller / de-risked
plan
43
Plan Spin-Off and Termination
• With respect to the terminated plan, the plan sponsor is no
longer required to pay PBGC premiums and the funding risks
and liabilities related to those participants are eliminated
• Funding considerations:
• Terminated plan needs to be fully funded (at least) to terminate and
annuitize
• Remaining plan may need additional contributions to further de-risk
44
Plan Spin-Off and Termination
• Two Plans – practical and fiduciary implications
• Plan documents
• Investment Policy Statements
• Investment Management Agreements
• Unwinding investments for spin
• Other
45
Plan Termination
• A plan sponsor can settle pension liabilities by voluntarily
terminating the plan. The decision to terminate the plan is settlor
in nature and not subject to fiduciary requirements
• However, the implementation of this strategy is fiduciary in
nature subject to the aforementioned rules
• The plan sponsor must fund the plan to the extent necessary to
fund liabilities. Payments made to participants via the purchase
of annuity contracts
• Same issues as discussed earlier (safest annuity available; independent
fiduciary)
46
Plan Termination
• Generally, the plan termination process takes many
months and involves a large number of steps, including the
following:
• Take appropriate corporate action to terminate the plan
• Determine investment strategy during termination process
• Amend the plan to provide for the termination
• If plan has not been frozen, provide participants with notice of the freeze
• Provide participants with notice of intent to terminate
• Prepare IRS determination letter and provide notice to interested parties
• Provide notice of plan benefits to participants
• Submit standard termination to the PBGC
47
Plan Termination
• And more!
• Obtain PBGC approval (deemed) and favorable IRS determination letter
• Distribute required participant disclosures
• Obtain all necessary consents (including spousal consents)
• Contribute all amounts necessary to fund the plan
• Purchase annuities
• File post-distribution certification with the PBGC
• Expect a PBGC audit of plan documents, list of participants, data supporting
48
Additional Considerations
Non-Qualified SERPS
• Many companies maintain a nonqualified SERP that works in
conjunction with the qualified defined benefit plan
• What effect does de-risking the qualified plan have on the SERP?
• Amendments required?
• Section 409A Issues:
• “Linking” time and form of payment between the qualified and
nonqualified is prohibited by Section 409A
• Distributions from a terminating SERP generally must be delayed 12
months and must be completed within 24 months after termination
• Take advantage of grandfathering rules
• Is the SERP subject to Section 409A entirely or in part (“grandfathered”)?
50
Non-Qualified SERPS
• Other Tax Issues
• Deductible under Section 162(m)?
• If accelerating distributions to active employee, may lose deduction
• State source rules?
• If accelerating distributions, SERP may no longer meet 10-year distribution rule and
subject SERP to tax in multiple states
• Right to amend/terminate?
• Unilateral contract theory
• Read your SERP document!
51
Multiemployer Plans
• Although de-risking strategies apply to single-employer plans,
employers that participate in multiemployer pension plans (i.e.,
union pension plans) may be able to reduce withdrawal liability
risk through the use of legal restrictions on payment amounts
with respect to such plans
• Depending on contractual obligations, employers may be able to
slowly reduce base units without triggering a current withdrawal
• Upon future withdrawal, liability (which looks to base units) may be
decreased
• In event of withdrawal, employers may be able to negotiate
lesser amount with trustees of multiemployer plan
52
Questions?
Thank You.
Michael Falk
Partner, Employee Benefits
Chicago
MFalk@winston.com
Steve Flores
Associate, Employee Benefits
Chicago
SAflores@winston.com
Erin Kartheiser
Partner, Employee Benefits
Chicago
EKarthei@winston.com
55

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Types of sponsors and investors in project finance
Types of sponsors and investors in project financeTypes of sponsors and investors in project finance
Types of sponsors and investors in project financeDima Mykulo
 
Sources Of Long Term Finance
Sources Of Long Term FinanceSources Of Long Term Finance
Sources Of Long Term Financewizkidrx
 
Sources of Long term Finance
Sources of Long term FinanceSources of Long term Finance
Sources of Long term FinanceAnu Damodaran
 
Sources of long term finance
Sources of long term financeSources of long term finance
Sources of long term financePraveen Kumar
 
Long Term Financing
Long Term FinancingLong Term Financing
Long Term Financingjim
 
Day 1 session 3A - 1530 - 1700 hours - Variable Annuity products: respondin...
Day 1   session 3A - 1530 - 1700 hours - Variable Annuity products: respondin...Day 1   session 3A - 1530 - 1700 hours - Variable Annuity products: respondin...
Day 1 session 3A - 1530 - 1700 hours - Variable Annuity products: respondin...Amit Ayer
 
Long Term Financing
Long Term FinancingLong Term Financing
Long Term FinancingShafeeq Rahi
 
Accounting for long term debt in governments
Accounting for long term debt in governmentsAccounting for long term debt in governments
Accounting for long term debt in governmentstpedersen76
 
Ongoing Nonqualified Plan Due Diligence Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011
Ongoing Nonqualified Plan Due Diligence Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011Ongoing Nonqualified Plan Due Diligence Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011
Ongoing Nonqualified Plan Due Diligence Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011NAFCU Services Corporation
 
Informal Funding Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011
Informal Funding Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011Informal Funding Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011
Informal Funding Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011NAFCU Services Corporation
 
Long Term Debt Funds - FundzBazar
Long Term Debt Funds - FundzBazarLong Term Debt Funds - FundzBazar
Long Term Debt Funds - FundzBazarFundz Bazar
 
Are bonds and debentures a good investment options for a retail investor
Are bonds and debentures a good investment options for a retail investorAre bonds and debentures a good investment options for a retail investor
Are bonds and debentures a good investment options for a retail investorHimanshu Jangir
 
Sources Of Finance
Sources Of FinanceSources Of Finance
Sources Of FinanceAlex Masters
 
Debentures Bonds and Term Loans
Debentures Bonds and Term LoansDebentures Bonds and Term Loans
Debentures Bonds and Term LoansSahith An
 
Concentrations of Credit Presentation
Concentrations of Credit PresentationConcentrations of Credit Presentation
Concentrations of Credit PresentationSimon Peter Ocailap
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Types of sponsors and investors in project finance
Types of sponsors and investors in project financeTypes of sponsors and investors in project finance
Types of sponsors and investors in project finance
 
Sources Of Long Term Finance
Sources Of Long Term FinanceSources Of Long Term Finance
Sources Of Long Term Finance
 
Sources of Long term Finance
Sources of Long term FinanceSources of Long term Finance
Sources of Long term Finance
 
Sources of long term finance
Sources of long term financeSources of long term finance
Sources of long term finance
 
Long Term Financing
Long Term FinancingLong Term Financing
Long Term Financing
 
Raising long term finance
Raising long term financeRaising long term finance
Raising long term finance
 
Day 1 session 3A - 1530 - 1700 hours - Variable Annuity products: respondin...
Day 1   session 3A - 1530 - 1700 hours - Variable Annuity products: respondin...Day 1   session 3A - 1530 - 1700 hours - Variable Annuity products: respondin...
Day 1 session 3A - 1530 - 1700 hours - Variable Annuity products: respondin...
 
Long Term Financing
Long Term FinancingLong Term Financing
Long Term Financing
 
Accounting for long term debt in governments
Accounting for long term debt in governmentsAccounting for long term debt in governments
Accounting for long term debt in governments
 
Sources of funds
Sources of fundsSources of funds
Sources of funds
 
Ongoing Nonqualified Plan Due Diligence Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011
Ongoing Nonqualified Plan Due Diligence Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011Ongoing Nonqualified Plan Due Diligence Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011
Ongoing Nonqualified Plan Due Diligence Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011
 
Informal Funding Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011
Informal Funding Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011Informal Funding Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011
Informal Funding Checklist for Credit Unions | BFB 2011
 
Long Term Debt Funds - FundzBazar
Long Term Debt Funds - FundzBazarLong Term Debt Funds - FundzBazar
Long Term Debt Funds - FundzBazar
 
Vol 01 chapter 16 2015
Vol 01 chapter 16 2015Vol 01 chapter 16 2015
Vol 01 chapter 16 2015
 
Are bonds and debentures a good investment options for a retail investor
Are bonds and debentures a good investment options for a retail investorAre bonds and debentures a good investment options for a retail investor
Are bonds and debentures a good investment options for a retail investor
 
Sources Of Finance
Sources Of FinanceSources Of Finance
Sources Of Finance
 
Debentures Bonds and Term Loans
Debentures Bonds and Term LoansDebentures Bonds and Term Loans
Debentures Bonds and Term Loans
 
sources of finance
sources of financesources of finance
sources of finance
 
Concentrations of Credit Presentation
Concentrations of Credit PresentationConcentrations of Credit Presentation
Concentrations of Credit Presentation
 
Misperception of Fiduciary Risk
Misperception of Fiduciary RiskMisperception of Fiduciary Risk
Misperception of Fiduciary Risk
 

Andere mochten auch

Pension plan freeze/termination issues_MWPC 2011
Pension plan freeze/termination issues_MWPC 2011Pension plan freeze/termination issues_MWPC 2011
Pension plan freeze/termination issues_MWPC 2011MWSchulte
 
Group Pension Scheme Member
Group Pension Scheme MemberGroup Pension Scheme Member
Group Pension Scheme MemberTony.Theokli
 
Defined benefits presentation 1
Defined benefits presentation 1Defined benefits presentation 1
Defined benefits presentation 1New Level Research
 
Transform and Modernize -UK's leading specialists in Pension and Employee Ben...
Transform and Modernize -UK's leading specialists in Pension and Employee Ben...Transform and Modernize -UK's leading specialists in Pension and Employee Ben...
Transform and Modernize -UK's leading specialists in Pension and Employee Ben...HCL Technologies
 

Andere mochten auch (6)

Frozen pension 1
Frozen pension 1Frozen pension 1
Frozen pension 1
 
Managing a Frozen Pension Plan
Managing a Frozen Pension PlanManaging a Frozen Pension Plan
Managing a Frozen Pension Plan
 
Pension plan freeze/termination issues_MWPC 2011
Pension plan freeze/termination issues_MWPC 2011Pension plan freeze/termination issues_MWPC 2011
Pension plan freeze/termination issues_MWPC 2011
 
Group Pension Scheme Member
Group Pension Scheme MemberGroup Pension Scheme Member
Group Pension Scheme Member
 
Defined benefits presentation 1
Defined benefits presentation 1Defined benefits presentation 1
Defined benefits presentation 1
 
Transform and Modernize -UK's leading specialists in Pension and Employee Ben...
Transform and Modernize -UK's leading specialists in Pension and Employee Ben...Transform and Modernize -UK's leading specialists in Pension and Employee Ben...
Transform and Modernize -UK's leading specialists in Pension and Employee Ben...
 

Ähnlich wie Pension Plan De-risking: Legal Challenges and Opportunities

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs for Private Companies
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs for Private CompaniesNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs for Private Companies
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs for Private CompaniesSkoda Minotti
 
Rabbi Trust: An Important Element of a Nonqualified Executive Benefit Plan du...
Rabbi Trust: An Important Element of a Nonqualified Executive Benefit Plan du...Rabbi Trust: An Important Element of a Nonqualified Executive Benefit Plan du...
Rabbi Trust: An Important Element of a Nonqualified Executive Benefit Plan du...Fulcrum Partners LLC
 
RMI Unit 6 Management of Insurance Companies Functions and Organization of In...
RMI Unit 6 Management of Insurance Companies Functions and Organization of In...RMI Unit 6 Management of Insurance Companies Functions and Organization of In...
RMI Unit 6 Management of Insurance Companies Functions and Organization of In...Kiran M
 
What Was the FASB Thinking?
What Was the FASB Thinking? What Was the FASB Thinking?
What Was the FASB Thinking? DecosimoCPAs
 
Gary Squires - db and the decline curve
Gary Squires  - db and the decline curveGary Squires  - db and the decline curve
Gary Squires - db and the decline curveGary Squires
 
CECL Methodology Series for Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures
CECL Methodology Series for Off-Balance-Sheet Credit ExposuresCECL Methodology Series for Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures
CECL Methodology Series for Off-Balance-Sheet Credit ExposuresLibby Bierman
 
Current Pension Risk Management Strategies
Current Pension Risk Management StrategiesCurrent Pension Risk Management Strategies
Current Pension Risk Management StrategiesCarol Buckmann
 
Key Bankruptcy Considerations Heading into a Recession
Key Bankruptcy Considerations Heading into a RecessionKey Bankruptcy Considerations Heading into a Recession
Key Bankruptcy Considerations Heading into a RecessionQuarles & Brady
 
CDC - an alternative way to keep collective schemes open
CDC - an alternative way to keep collective schemes openCDC - an alternative way to keep collective schemes open
CDC - an alternative way to keep collective schemes openHenry Tapper
 
Credit risk management
Credit risk managementCredit risk management
Credit risk managementwindpravin
 
Dividend decisions
Dividend decisionsDividend decisions
Dividend decisionspadmach8
 
Randall Webb - TJSDD - Common Pitfalls and Deficiencies Found in Plan Audits
Randall Webb - TJSDD - Common Pitfalls and Deficiencies Found in Plan AuditsRandall Webb - TJSDD - Common Pitfalls and Deficiencies Found in Plan Audits
Randall Webb - TJSDD - Common Pitfalls and Deficiencies Found in Plan AuditsDowney Brand LLP
 
Financing Large Projects 13 - Sum Up.pptx
Financing Large Projects 13 - Sum Up.pptxFinancing Large Projects 13 - Sum Up.pptx
Financing Large Projects 13 - Sum Up.pptxTanyaGupta696023
 
Modelling For Provisioning Of Bad Debt Under ifrs 9
Modelling For Provisioning Of Bad Debt Under ifrs 9Modelling For Provisioning Of Bad Debt Under ifrs 9
Modelling For Provisioning Of Bad Debt Under ifrs 9Ali Zeeshan
 
Business Borrowing Basics 2020 - Dealing With Defaults
Business Borrowing Basics 2020 - Dealing With DefaultsBusiness Borrowing Basics 2020 - Dealing With Defaults
Business Borrowing Basics 2020 - Dealing With DefaultsFinancial Poise
 
HVCRE (high volatility commercial real estate): A Primer
HVCRE (high volatility commercial real estate): A PrimerHVCRE (high volatility commercial real estate): A Primer
HVCRE (high volatility commercial real estate): A PrimerLibby Bierman
 
Insurance act presentation - southampton May 2016
Insurance act presentation - southampton May 2016Insurance act presentation - southampton May 2016
Insurance act presentation - southampton May 2016Michael Howard
 

Ähnlich wie Pension Plan De-risking: Legal Challenges and Opportunities (20)

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs for Private Companies
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs for Private CompaniesNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs for Private Companies
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Programs for Private Companies
 
Rabbi Trust: An Important Element of a Nonqualified Executive Benefit Plan du...
Rabbi Trust: An Important Element of a Nonqualified Executive Benefit Plan du...Rabbi Trust: An Important Element of a Nonqualified Executive Benefit Plan du...
Rabbi Trust: An Important Element of a Nonqualified Executive Benefit Plan du...
 
RMI Unit 6 Management of Insurance Companies Functions and Organization of In...
RMI Unit 6 Management of Insurance Companies Functions and Organization of In...RMI Unit 6 Management of Insurance Companies Functions and Organization of In...
RMI Unit 6 Management of Insurance Companies Functions and Organization of In...
 
What Was the FASB Thinking?
What Was the FASB Thinking? What Was the FASB Thinking?
What Was the FASB Thinking?
 
Gary Squires - db and the decline curve
Gary Squires  - db and the decline curveGary Squires  - db and the decline curve
Gary Squires - db and the decline curve
 
CECL Methodology Series for Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures
CECL Methodology Series for Off-Balance-Sheet Credit ExposuresCECL Methodology Series for Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures
CECL Methodology Series for Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures
 
Current Pension Risk Management Strategies
Current Pension Risk Management StrategiesCurrent Pension Risk Management Strategies
Current Pension Risk Management Strategies
 
Key Bankruptcy Considerations Heading into a Recession
Key Bankruptcy Considerations Heading into a RecessionKey Bankruptcy Considerations Heading into a Recession
Key Bankruptcy Considerations Heading into a Recession
 
CDC - an alternative way to keep collective schemes open
CDC - an alternative way to keep collective schemes openCDC - an alternative way to keep collective schemes open
CDC - an alternative way to keep collective schemes open
 
Credit risk management
Credit risk managementCredit risk management
Credit risk management
 
Dividend decisions
Dividend decisionsDividend decisions
Dividend decisions
 
Regulation Revolution
Regulation RevolutionRegulation Revolution
Regulation Revolution
 
LECTURE TWO.pptx
LECTURE TWO.pptxLECTURE TWO.pptx
LECTURE TWO.pptx
 
Randall Webb - TJSDD - Common Pitfalls and Deficiencies Found in Plan Audits
Randall Webb - TJSDD - Common Pitfalls and Deficiencies Found in Plan AuditsRandall Webb - TJSDD - Common Pitfalls and Deficiencies Found in Plan Audits
Randall Webb - TJSDD - Common Pitfalls and Deficiencies Found in Plan Audits
 
Financing Large Projects 13 - Sum Up.pptx
Financing Large Projects 13 - Sum Up.pptxFinancing Large Projects 13 - Sum Up.pptx
Financing Large Projects 13 - Sum Up.pptx
 
Project financing
Project financingProject financing
Project financing
 
Modelling For Provisioning Of Bad Debt Under ifrs 9
Modelling For Provisioning Of Bad Debt Under ifrs 9Modelling For Provisioning Of Bad Debt Under ifrs 9
Modelling For Provisioning Of Bad Debt Under ifrs 9
 
Business Borrowing Basics 2020 - Dealing With Defaults
Business Borrowing Basics 2020 - Dealing With DefaultsBusiness Borrowing Basics 2020 - Dealing With Defaults
Business Borrowing Basics 2020 - Dealing With Defaults
 
HVCRE (high volatility commercial real estate): A Primer
HVCRE (high volatility commercial real estate): A PrimerHVCRE (high volatility commercial real estate): A Primer
HVCRE (high volatility commercial real estate): A Primer
 
Insurance act presentation - southampton May 2016
Insurance act presentation - southampton May 2016Insurance act presentation - southampton May 2016
Insurance act presentation - southampton May 2016
 

Mehr von Winston & Strawn LLP

The Nordic Sessions: Avoiding Employment Law Landmines
The Nordic Sessions: Avoiding Employment Law LandminesThe Nordic Sessions: Avoiding Employment Law Landmines
The Nordic Sessions: Avoiding Employment Law LandminesWinston & Strawn LLP
 
Latest Developments Regarding Arbitration in Hong Kong and Mainland China
Latest Developments Regarding Arbitration in Hong Kong and Mainland ChinaLatest Developments Regarding Arbitration in Hong Kong and Mainland China
Latest Developments Regarding Arbitration in Hong Kong and Mainland ChinaWinston & Strawn LLP
 
Recent Trends in Regulatory Actions Impacting Banks and Financial Institutions
Recent Trends in Regulatory Actions Impacting Banks and Financial InstitutionsRecent Trends in Regulatory Actions Impacting Banks and Financial Institutions
Recent Trends in Regulatory Actions Impacting Banks and Financial InstitutionsWinston & Strawn LLP
 
Computer Forensics – What Every Lawyer Needs to Know
Computer Forensics – What Every Lawyer Needs to KnowComputer Forensics – What Every Lawyer Needs to Know
Computer Forensics – What Every Lawyer Needs to KnowWinston & Strawn LLP
 
Maximizing Deductions in Light of the Section 162(m) Guidance
Maximizing Deductions in Light of the Section 162(m) GuidanceMaximizing Deductions in Light of the Section 162(m) Guidance
Maximizing Deductions in Light of the Section 162(m) GuidanceWinston & Strawn LLP
 
Regulators on the Move – Recent Treasury and Comptroller Actions: How They Af...
Regulators on the Move – Recent Treasury and Comptroller Actions: How They Af...Regulators on the Move – Recent Treasury and Comptroller Actions: How They Af...
Regulators on the Move – Recent Treasury and Comptroller Actions: How They Af...Winston & Strawn LLP
 
IRS and DOL Audit Issues for Retirement Plans
IRS and DOL Audit Issues for Retirement PlansIRS and DOL Audit Issues for Retirement Plans
IRS and DOL Audit Issues for Retirement PlansWinston & Strawn LLP
 
Solutions to Section 301 Tariffs on Products from China—Managing the Shock of...
Solutions to Section 301 Tariffs on Products from China—Managing the Shock of...Solutions to Section 301 Tariffs on Products from China—Managing the Shock of...
Solutions to Section 301 Tariffs on Products from China—Managing the Shock of...Winston & Strawn LLP
 
Best Practices for Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption (ABAC) Compliance
Best Practices for Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption (ABAC) ComplianceBest Practices for Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption (ABAC) Compliance
Best Practices for Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption (ABAC) ComplianceWinston & Strawn LLP
 
International Transactions Program
International Transactions ProgramInternational Transactions Program
International Transactions ProgramWinston & Strawn LLP
 
Recent Legislation Impacting Dodd-Frank Requirements: What Financial Institut...
Recent Legislation Impacting Dodd-Frank Requirements: What Financial Institut...Recent Legislation Impacting Dodd-Frank Requirements: What Financial Institut...
Recent Legislation Impacting Dodd-Frank Requirements: What Financial Institut...Winston & Strawn LLP
 
Trade Secret Protection: Practical Advice on Protecting and Defending Your Or...
Trade Secret Protection: Practical Advice on Protecting and Defending Your Or...Trade Secret Protection: Practical Advice on Protecting and Defending Your Or...
Trade Secret Protection: Practical Advice on Protecting and Defending Your Or...Winston & Strawn LLP
 
Cryptocurrency Crackdown: What You Need to Know about Enhanced IRS/Government...
Cryptocurrency Crackdown: What You Need to Know about Enhanced IRS/Government...Cryptocurrency Crackdown: What You Need to Know about Enhanced IRS/Government...
Cryptocurrency Crackdown: What You Need to Know about Enhanced IRS/Government...Winston & Strawn LLP
 
Sanctions & Export Controls: Focus on Medical Devices
Sanctions & Export Controls: Focus on Medical DevicesSanctions & Export Controls: Focus on Medical Devices
Sanctions & Export Controls: Focus on Medical DevicesWinston & Strawn LLP
 
The Equal Rights Amendment: Legal Issues and Implications
The Equal Rights Amendment: Legal Issues and ImplicationsThe Equal Rights Amendment: Legal Issues and Implications
The Equal Rights Amendment: Legal Issues and ImplicationsWinston & Strawn LLP
 
Under New Management: What to Expect from a Trump NLRB
Under New Management: What to Expect from a Trump NLRBUnder New Management: What to Expect from a Trump NLRB
Under New Management: What to Expect from a Trump NLRBWinston & Strawn LLP
 
2018 Hot Topics for Health & Welfare Plans, Fringe Benefits, and Withholding ...
2018 Hot Topics for Health & Welfare Plans, Fringe Benefits, and Withholding ...2018 Hot Topics for Health & Welfare Plans, Fringe Benefits, and Withholding ...
2018 Hot Topics for Health & Welfare Plans, Fringe Benefits, and Withholding ...Winston & Strawn LLP
 
The Real Deal Webinar Series: Delaware Law Developments/Recent Judicial Decis...
The Real Deal Webinar Series: Delaware Law Developments/Recent Judicial Decis...The Real Deal Webinar Series: Delaware Law Developments/Recent Judicial Decis...
The Real Deal Webinar Series: Delaware Law Developments/Recent Judicial Decis...Winston & Strawn LLP
 
GDPR is Coming, Five Things You Can Do Now To Prepare
GDPR is Coming, Five Things You Can Do Now To PrepareGDPR is Coming, Five Things You Can Do Now To Prepare
GDPR is Coming, Five Things You Can Do Now To PrepareWinston & Strawn LLP
 
The Real Deal Webinar Series: Practical Advice from a Former Chief Compliance...
The Real Deal Webinar Series: Practical Advice from a Former Chief Compliance...The Real Deal Webinar Series: Practical Advice from a Former Chief Compliance...
The Real Deal Webinar Series: Practical Advice from a Former Chief Compliance...Winston & Strawn LLP
 

Mehr von Winston & Strawn LLP (20)

The Nordic Sessions: Avoiding Employment Law Landmines
The Nordic Sessions: Avoiding Employment Law LandminesThe Nordic Sessions: Avoiding Employment Law Landmines
The Nordic Sessions: Avoiding Employment Law Landmines
 
Latest Developments Regarding Arbitration in Hong Kong and Mainland China
Latest Developments Regarding Arbitration in Hong Kong and Mainland ChinaLatest Developments Regarding Arbitration in Hong Kong and Mainland China
Latest Developments Regarding Arbitration in Hong Kong and Mainland China
 
Recent Trends in Regulatory Actions Impacting Banks and Financial Institutions
Recent Trends in Regulatory Actions Impacting Banks and Financial InstitutionsRecent Trends in Regulatory Actions Impacting Banks and Financial Institutions
Recent Trends in Regulatory Actions Impacting Banks and Financial Institutions
 
Computer Forensics – What Every Lawyer Needs to Know
Computer Forensics – What Every Lawyer Needs to KnowComputer Forensics – What Every Lawyer Needs to Know
Computer Forensics – What Every Lawyer Needs to Know
 
Maximizing Deductions in Light of the Section 162(m) Guidance
Maximizing Deductions in Light of the Section 162(m) GuidanceMaximizing Deductions in Light of the Section 162(m) Guidance
Maximizing Deductions in Light of the Section 162(m) Guidance
 
Regulators on the Move – Recent Treasury and Comptroller Actions: How They Af...
Regulators on the Move – Recent Treasury and Comptroller Actions: How They Af...Regulators on the Move – Recent Treasury and Comptroller Actions: How They Af...
Regulators on the Move – Recent Treasury and Comptroller Actions: How They Af...
 
IRS and DOL Audit Issues for Retirement Plans
IRS and DOL Audit Issues for Retirement PlansIRS and DOL Audit Issues for Retirement Plans
IRS and DOL Audit Issues for Retirement Plans
 
Solutions to Section 301 Tariffs on Products from China—Managing the Shock of...
Solutions to Section 301 Tariffs on Products from China—Managing the Shock of...Solutions to Section 301 Tariffs on Products from China—Managing the Shock of...
Solutions to Section 301 Tariffs on Products from China—Managing the Shock of...
 
Best Practices for Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption (ABAC) Compliance
Best Practices for Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption (ABAC) ComplianceBest Practices for Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption (ABAC) Compliance
Best Practices for Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption (ABAC) Compliance
 
International Transactions Program
International Transactions ProgramInternational Transactions Program
International Transactions Program
 
Recent Legislation Impacting Dodd-Frank Requirements: What Financial Institut...
Recent Legislation Impacting Dodd-Frank Requirements: What Financial Institut...Recent Legislation Impacting Dodd-Frank Requirements: What Financial Institut...
Recent Legislation Impacting Dodd-Frank Requirements: What Financial Institut...
 
Trade Secret Protection: Practical Advice on Protecting and Defending Your Or...
Trade Secret Protection: Practical Advice on Protecting and Defending Your Or...Trade Secret Protection: Practical Advice on Protecting and Defending Your Or...
Trade Secret Protection: Practical Advice on Protecting and Defending Your Or...
 
Cryptocurrency Crackdown: What You Need to Know about Enhanced IRS/Government...
Cryptocurrency Crackdown: What You Need to Know about Enhanced IRS/Government...Cryptocurrency Crackdown: What You Need to Know about Enhanced IRS/Government...
Cryptocurrency Crackdown: What You Need to Know about Enhanced IRS/Government...
 
Sanctions & Export Controls: Focus on Medical Devices
Sanctions & Export Controls: Focus on Medical DevicesSanctions & Export Controls: Focus on Medical Devices
Sanctions & Export Controls: Focus on Medical Devices
 
The Equal Rights Amendment: Legal Issues and Implications
The Equal Rights Amendment: Legal Issues and ImplicationsThe Equal Rights Amendment: Legal Issues and Implications
The Equal Rights Amendment: Legal Issues and Implications
 
Under New Management: What to Expect from a Trump NLRB
Under New Management: What to Expect from a Trump NLRBUnder New Management: What to Expect from a Trump NLRB
Under New Management: What to Expect from a Trump NLRB
 
2018 Hot Topics for Health & Welfare Plans, Fringe Benefits, and Withholding ...
2018 Hot Topics for Health & Welfare Plans, Fringe Benefits, and Withholding ...2018 Hot Topics for Health & Welfare Plans, Fringe Benefits, and Withholding ...
2018 Hot Topics for Health & Welfare Plans, Fringe Benefits, and Withholding ...
 
The Real Deal Webinar Series: Delaware Law Developments/Recent Judicial Decis...
The Real Deal Webinar Series: Delaware Law Developments/Recent Judicial Decis...The Real Deal Webinar Series: Delaware Law Developments/Recent Judicial Decis...
The Real Deal Webinar Series: Delaware Law Developments/Recent Judicial Decis...
 
GDPR is Coming, Five Things You Can Do Now To Prepare
GDPR is Coming, Five Things You Can Do Now To PrepareGDPR is Coming, Five Things You Can Do Now To Prepare
GDPR is Coming, Five Things You Can Do Now To Prepare
 
The Real Deal Webinar Series: Practical Advice from a Former Chief Compliance...
The Real Deal Webinar Series: Practical Advice from a Former Chief Compliance...The Real Deal Webinar Series: Practical Advice from a Former Chief Compliance...
The Real Deal Webinar Series: Practical Advice from a Former Chief Compliance...
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...Dr. Oliver Massmann
 
Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...
Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...
Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...SHRADDHA PANDIT
 
An introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha Pandit
An introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha PanditAn introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha Pandit
An introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha PanditSHRADDHA PANDIT
 
The Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a Template
The Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a TemplateThe Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a Template
The Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a TemplateBTL Law P.C.
 
Classification of Contracts in Business Regulations
Classification of Contracts in Business RegulationsClassification of Contracts in Business Regulations
Classification of Contracts in Business RegulationsSyedaAyeshaTabassum1
 
xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.
xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.
xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.mike689707
 
ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...
ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...
ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...Anadi Tewari
 
Patents and AI: Current Tools, Future Solutions
Patents and AI: Current Tools, Future SolutionsPatents and AI: Current Tools, Future Solutions
Patents and AI: Current Tools, Future SolutionsAurora Consulting
 
Islamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdf
Islamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdfIslamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdf
Islamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdfNo One
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (10)

Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...
Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD or the EU Supply Chai...
 
Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...
Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...
Women and the World of Climate Change- A Conceptual Foundation by Shraddha Pa...
 
An introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha Pandit
An introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha PanditAn introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha Pandit
An introduction to Indian Contract Act, 1872 by Shraddha Pandit
 
The Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a Template
The Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a TemplateThe Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a Template
The Ultimate Guide to Drafting Your Separation Agreement with a Template
 
Classification of Contracts in Business Regulations
Classification of Contracts in Business RegulationsClassification of Contracts in Business Regulations
Classification of Contracts in Business Regulations
 
xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.
xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.
xLran: Open source AI for legal hackers.
 
Criminalizing Disabilities & False Confessions
Criminalizing Disabilities & False ConfessionsCriminalizing Disabilities & False Confessions
Criminalizing Disabilities & False Confessions
 
ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...
ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...
ArtificiaI Intelligence based Cyber Forensic Tools: Relevancy and Admissibili...
 
Patents and AI: Current Tools, Future Solutions
Patents and AI: Current Tools, Future SolutionsPatents and AI: Current Tools, Future Solutions
Patents and AI: Current Tools, Future Solutions
 
Islamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdf
Islamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdfIslamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdf
Islamabad High Court Judges wrote a letter to Supreme Judicial Council.pdf
 

Pension Plan De-risking: Legal Challenges and Opportunities

  • 1. De-risking Alternatives for Plan Sponsors – Compliance Requirements April 16, 2015 Presented by: Michael Falk, Erin Kartheiser, and Steve Flores
  • 2. Today’s eLunch Presenters Michael Falk Partner, Employee Benefits Chicago MFalk@winston.com Steve Flores Associate, Employee Benefits Chicago SAflores@winston.com Erin Kartheiser Partner, Employee Benefits Chicago EKarthei@winston.com 2
  • 3. Overview  Trends in Pension Plan De-risking  In-Plan Investment Strategies  Lump Sum Windows and Annuitization  Benefit Accrual and Plan Freeze  Plan Spin-Offs and Terminations  Additional Considerations 3
  • 4. Trends in Pension Plan De-risking
  • 5. De-risking Trends • History: • The concept of de-risking is only a few years old • In 2012, Ford Motor Company offered a lump sum window to retirees and former employees • Later that same year, General Motors and Verizon conducted annuity buy-outs • These actions removed billions of dollars in pension obligations from the companies’ books • Countless companies have since engaged in de-risking activities 5
  • 6. De-risking Trends • De-risking trend is expected to continue • However, the climate may become less favorable to de-risking in future years • New mortality tables • Increased regulation and disclosure of de-risking activities • Market slowdown 6
  • 7. De-risking Trends • New Mortality Tables • Society of Actuaries put out new mortality tables for defined benefit pension plans in 2014 • These tables are expected to cause a significant increase in employers’ funding obligations • Increased plan asset levels and ever-increasing PBGC premiums are other factors that will continue to make de- risking attractive 7
  • 8. De-risking Trends • De-risking regulatory initiatives • PBGC now requires plan sponsors to report de-risking information • Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) recommends that plan sponsors report to the DOL regarding de-risking transactions, and provide detailed participant disclosures • GAO also recommends rules concerning interest rates used for lump sum valuations, and timelines for adopting updated mortality tables 8
  • 9. De-risking Trends • De-risking regulatory initiatives • Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans recommendations • Enhanced fiduciary standards • Enhanced participant disclosures • Include information regarding potential tax penalties, whether an early retirement or other subsidy is included in the calculation of the lump sum distribution, and a comparison of a lump sum distribution to the benefit otherwise payable • Disclosures are likely to become more onerous • Possible restrictions surrounding interest rates and mortality tables 9
  • 11. In-Plan Investments • Pension Buy-Ins • Plan sponsor pays premium to an insurer • Insurer pays income stream to the plan • Income stream matches the pension benefits being paid out • Pensioners continue to be plan participants • Does not remove liabilities from the plan • Insures a portion of the plan’s liabilities • Removes risk of market volatility for the applicable portion of the assets 11
  • 12. In-Plan Investments • Pension Buy-Ins • Advantages • No settlement charge • No additional funding required • Disadvantages • PBGC premiums and administrative costs do not decrease 12
  • 13. In-Plan Investments • Fiduciary Responsibilities • Loyalty • Prudence • Exclusive Benefit of Plan Participants • Administer the Plan in Accordance With Its Terms • Others 13
  • 14. In-Plan Investments • Liability-Driven Investing (“LDI”) • Investing the plan’s assets to close its funding gap • Focuses on matching the plan’s assets to its liabilities • Various methods available • Review and revise Investment Policy Statement • Conduct due diligence to select an investment manager 14
  • 15. In-Plan Investments • Liability-Driven Investing (“LDI”) • Important considerations • Will the plan terminate? • Will the plan become frozen to participants or accruals? • What is the plan’s funding goals? • How much volatility is acceptable? 15
  • 16. In-Plan Investments • Liability-Driven Investing (“LDI”) • Consider current funded status of the plan • Well-funded plans may focus on minimizing funded status volatility and preserving current funding level • Defined benefit plans have unique characteristics as compared to other investors • LDI takes interest rate into account • Devise LDI strategy using plan’s predicted cash flow needs 16
  • 17. In-Plan Investments • Liability-Driven Investing (“LDI”) • The goal is to pay for all of the plan’s current and future liabilities • Matches the plan’s liabilities with assets of same duration (“immunization”) • Example: An LDI strategy might focus on matching the duration of the plan’s liabilities and the bonds in the portfolio. If long-duration bond prices decrease due to interest rate increases, the liabilities of the plan should also decrease 17
  • 18. In-Plan Investments • Hedging • Investing to offset negative events • Used to mitigate funding volatility • Goal is to reduce risk, not maximize gains 18
  • 19. In-Plan Investments • Liability-Driven Investing Disadvantages • “Locks in” funded status—and that’s not always a good thing • Loss of opportunity to benefit from a rising market 19
  • 20. Lump Sum Windows and Annuitization
  • 21. Lump Sum Windows and Annuities • Short of terminating a plan, sponsors can reduce liabilities and volatility by offering lump sum cash settlements or insurer provided annuities 22
  • 22. Lump Sum Windows • A plan may offer lump sums to participants who are eligible to receive distributions • The decision to offer lump sums is settlor in nature and not subject to fiduciary requirements • However, the implementation of this strategy is fiduciary in nature subject to ERISA fiduciary rules 23
  • 23. Lump Sum Windows • Important considerations: • Whether to make the availability of the lump sum temporary or permanent • What parameters to affix to the lump sum window • Who will be eligible for the window? • Terminated vested participants • Retirees in pay status • Updates to mortality tables • Plan funded status • Administrative costs and burdens 24
  • 24. Lump Sum Windows • Notice and Consent Requirements • For the lump sum election to be effective, the plan sponsor must provide notice of: • The financial effect and relative value of optional forms of benefits • Rollover rights • Right to defer benefit commencement • Must obtain consent to distribute • May need to obtain spousal consent • Don’t forget about QDROs 25
  • 25. Lump Sum Windows • Government Accountability Office Report on Private Pensions makes the following recommendations: • Improved oversight by requiring plan sponsors to alert DOL when they implement lump sum windows • Coordinate with Treasury to clarify guidance on information plan sponsors provide to participants • Treasury should reassess regulations governing relative value statements, as well as interest rates and mortality tables used in calculating lump sums 26
  • 26. Lump Sum Windows • Potential for litigation? • Adams v. Sun Company • Plan sponsor amended plan to offer lump sum window of annuities to terminated vested participants • Participant materials indicated that the window was a “one time” opportunity • In connection with a sale of the plan sponsor, a second opportunity for a lump sum was provided • Between the first and the second window, interest rates fell, resulting in larger lump sums for the second group • The participants in the first group sued for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA for failing to disclose that a second window would occur when the first window was communicated 27
  • 27. Annuitization • Instead of and/or in addition to providing lump sums, an employer may also purchase an annuity contract • The annuity provider is then responsible for paying participants • The decision to offer annuity contracts is settlor in nature and not subject to fiduciary requirements • However, the selection of annuity providers is a fiduciary act that must be taken with the utmost care 28
  • 28. Annuitization • Full risk transfer—can take the form of a pension buyout where a plan sponsor transfers all risk to an insurance company in exchange for a lump sum payment. Typically seen in plan terminations • Partial risk transfer—can also take target-specific liabilities 29
  • 29. Annuitization • The selection of an annuity provider is a fiduciary function • Under Interpretive Bulletin 95-1, fiduciaries must consider the following factors when selecting the “safest available annuity”: • the quality and diversification of the insurer’s investment portfolio; • the size of the insurer relative to the proposed annuity contract; • the level of the insurer’s capital and surplus; • the lines of business of the insurer and other indications of an insurer’s exposure to liability; • the structure of the annuity contract and guarantees supporting the annuities, such as the use of insurance company separate accounts; and • the availability of additional protection through state guaranty associations and the extent of the guarantees 30
  • 30. Annuitization • Plan sponsor may use an independent fiduciary to avoid conflicts of interest when the same individuals act in corporate and fiduciary capacities • An independent fiduciary can • Advise the fiduciaries charged with selecting the annuity • Be the final decision-maker on the annuity provider 31
  • 31. Annuitization • Plan sponsor must make sure that all documentation during annuity selection process clearly reflects the differences between fiduciary and non-fiduciary activities • Plan sponsors must ensure that any actions taken are permitted/reflected in plan documents and procedures • Critical to have clear delegation of authority for all actions taken • Follow plan documents, charters, and policies 32
  • 32. Annuitization • Pros: The plan sponsor is no longer required to pay PBGC premiums and funding risks and liabilities related to participants are eliminated • Cons: Risk of potential liability for fiduciaries who select annuity provider 33
  • 33. Annuitization • Potential for Litigation? • Lee v. Verizon actions • Through the purchase of a group annuity contract Verizon transferred significant pension liabilities to the Prudential Insurance Company of America • In first action, participants sought declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent purchase of the group annuity contract arguing that: • Plan sponsor failed to disclose in SPD that it retained the right to transfer pension obligations to an insurance provider • Plan sponsor breached fiduciary duties • Plan sponsor discriminated against affected retirees 34
  • 34. Annuitization • In the second action, a new set of claims by participants whose benefits were not annuitized alleged that plan sponsor breached fiduciary duties and depleted the plan’s assets by paying an excessive and unreasonable amount of expenses to complete the annuity transaction • The district court allowed the participants to amend their pleadings • District court has ruled against the plaintiffs • Currently pending before the Fifth Circuit 35
  • 35. Benefit Accrual and Plan Freeze
  • 36. Change Benefit Accrual Rules • An employer can amend a plan to reduce future benefit accruals • Change benefit formula • Move to a cash balance plan arrangement • Freeze the plan • Make sure the amendment does not cut back benefits • Follow plan procedures • Notify participants of the change 37
  • 37. Plan Freeze • Plan Freeze. A plan may be amended to freeze as to participation (“soft freeze”) and/or benefit accruals (“hard freeze”) • The decision to freeze a plan is settlor in nature and not subject to fiduciary requirements. However, the implementation of this strategy is fiduciary in nature subject to ERISA fiduciary rules 38
  • 38. Plan Freeze • Implementation: • Advance notice of reduction of future benefit accruals must be provided to participants, beneficiaries, alternate payees, and union representatives • Notice must be provided at least 45 days before plan amendment is effective (15 days for plans with fewer than 100 participants) • Plan document must be amended—make sure proper procedures are followed! • May create issues under IRC nondiscrimination rules • IRS has provided limited relief in this area 39
  • 39. Plan Freeze • Pros: Reduces long-term costs and volatility by ceasing benefit accruals • Cons: The plan sponsor continues to pay PBGC premiums, continues to assume the risk for all participants, and maintains the administrative burdens associated with maintaining a plan 40
  • 40. Plan Spin-Off and Termination
  • 41. Plan Spin-Off and Termination • Whereas annuitization of retirees is a “lift-out” (see Verizon), another approach is to break the defined benefit plan into two plans (see GM and Motorola Solutions) • A plan sponsor may spin-off a portion of the plan, thus creating two plans. Then one plan continues on (and perhaps further de- risks) while the other plan is terminated • May reduce litigation risk, as more law exists as to how plan assets are allocated between the two plans • If a plan is not fully funded (most plans), assets are allocated among priority categories 42
  • 42. Plan Spin-Off and Termination • The decision to spin off and terminate a portion of the plan is settlor in nature and not subject to fiduciary requirements. However, the implementation of this strategy is fiduciary in nature subject to the aforementioned rules • From an HR perspective, retirees will improve position with benefits now backed by a highly rated and regulated insurer, while remaining participants will benefit from smaller / de-risked plan 43
  • 43. Plan Spin-Off and Termination • With respect to the terminated plan, the plan sponsor is no longer required to pay PBGC premiums and the funding risks and liabilities related to those participants are eliminated • Funding considerations: • Terminated plan needs to be fully funded (at least) to terminate and annuitize • Remaining plan may need additional contributions to further de-risk 44
  • 44. Plan Spin-Off and Termination • Two Plans – practical and fiduciary implications • Plan documents • Investment Policy Statements • Investment Management Agreements • Unwinding investments for spin • Other 45
  • 45. Plan Termination • A plan sponsor can settle pension liabilities by voluntarily terminating the plan. The decision to terminate the plan is settlor in nature and not subject to fiduciary requirements • However, the implementation of this strategy is fiduciary in nature subject to the aforementioned rules • The plan sponsor must fund the plan to the extent necessary to fund liabilities. Payments made to participants via the purchase of annuity contracts • Same issues as discussed earlier (safest annuity available; independent fiduciary) 46
  • 46. Plan Termination • Generally, the plan termination process takes many months and involves a large number of steps, including the following: • Take appropriate corporate action to terminate the plan • Determine investment strategy during termination process • Amend the plan to provide for the termination • If plan has not been frozen, provide participants with notice of the freeze • Provide participants with notice of intent to terminate • Prepare IRS determination letter and provide notice to interested parties • Provide notice of plan benefits to participants • Submit standard termination to the PBGC 47
  • 47. Plan Termination • And more! • Obtain PBGC approval (deemed) and favorable IRS determination letter • Distribute required participant disclosures • Obtain all necessary consents (including spousal consents) • Contribute all amounts necessary to fund the plan • Purchase annuities • File post-distribution certification with the PBGC • Expect a PBGC audit of plan documents, list of participants, data supporting 48
  • 49. Non-Qualified SERPS • Many companies maintain a nonqualified SERP that works in conjunction with the qualified defined benefit plan • What effect does de-risking the qualified plan have on the SERP? • Amendments required? • Section 409A Issues: • “Linking” time and form of payment between the qualified and nonqualified is prohibited by Section 409A • Distributions from a terminating SERP generally must be delayed 12 months and must be completed within 24 months after termination • Take advantage of grandfathering rules • Is the SERP subject to Section 409A entirely or in part (“grandfathered”)? 50
  • 50. Non-Qualified SERPS • Other Tax Issues • Deductible under Section 162(m)? • If accelerating distributions to active employee, may lose deduction • State source rules? • If accelerating distributions, SERP may no longer meet 10-year distribution rule and subject SERP to tax in multiple states • Right to amend/terminate? • Unilateral contract theory • Read your SERP document! 51
  • 51. Multiemployer Plans • Although de-risking strategies apply to single-employer plans, employers that participate in multiemployer pension plans (i.e., union pension plans) may be able to reduce withdrawal liability risk through the use of legal restrictions on payment amounts with respect to such plans • Depending on contractual obligations, employers may be able to slowly reduce base units without triggering a current withdrawal • Upon future withdrawal, liability (which looks to base units) may be decreased • In event of withdrawal, employers may be able to negotiate lesser amount with trustees of multiemployer plan 52
  • 53. Thank You. Michael Falk Partner, Employee Benefits Chicago MFalk@winston.com Steve Flores Associate, Employee Benefits Chicago SAflores@winston.com Erin Kartheiser Partner, Employee Benefits Chicago EKarthei@winston.com 55