Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (17)
Similar to Assistant Chair Fall 2011 Webinar
Similar to Assistant Chair Fall 2011 Webinar (20)
More from WASC Senior
More from WASC Senior (10)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Assistant Chair Fall 2011 Webinar
- 1. Assistant Chair Webinar Thursday, July 14, 2011 Please join the audio portion of this training: 866-740-1260, Access Code: 7489001 ReadyTalk Help Desk: 800.843.9166 International Help: 303.209.1600
- 2. Announcements This presentation and the accompanying materials are available for download from: http://www.wascsenior.org/acresources For assistance with Voice and Web connections please contact: ReadyTalk Help Desk, 800.843.9166 International Help: 303.209.1600 Please mute your microphone if you are not speaking
- 21. EER Toolkit
- 22. Ā
- 23. Ā
- 24. Ā
- 26. Thank you for your service to WASC and the region This presentation and the accompanying materials are available for download from: http://www.wascsenior.org/acresources
Editor's Notes
- Introductions Name, institution, institution being visited, experience as AC
- Importance of role of the AC for the effectiveness of the visit and quality of the report
- Importance of role of the AC for the effectiveness of the visit and quality of the report
- Compiling: Sometimes a summary is needed. Keith re color coding.
- New report forms to be sent this summer
- See common problems later
- Emails as extension of open meeting No unsupported claims should get into report
- BEFORE LEAVING campus
- Team chair is responsible for finalizing draft, asking ALO/CEO for corrections of fact, and then finalizing report and getting it to WASC Team chairs vary in degree of control and involvement at this stage of AC and rest of team
- Ask Eleanor, Jackie and John E for comments on this as Commissioners: clarity, what do you really think? Donāt pull punches. Links to CFRs. Report should not tell how to fix a problem.
- This is one of weaknesses we see in team reports. Conclusions not supported by evidence. Focus too much on process re assessment of student learning without discussion of results. āThey are doing itā as opposed to āThis is what they found about what student learn when they did it.ā
- Usually 3-5 main recommendations in a report, unless there are serious issues. IF the team is recommending a sanction, need to be very specific and even more conscientious about documenting basis for findings.