Episode 4

Episode 4

WALTER TORINO RAVAL
BTVTED CSS 4A BANDURA
FS 2 Episode 4
My Learning Activities
I will observe 4 Resource Teachers with the use of Observation Sheets, analyze then reflect on my observation.
OBSERVATION SHEET # 4.1
Bloom’ Levels of Processing Cognitive Activities
Resource Teacher: Mrs. Violy E. Marzan, LPT Teacher’s Signature:
School: Pilot Elementary School Date: September 23, 2021
Grade/ Year Level: Grade 6 Subject Area: Literature
Bloom’s level of processing cognitive activities
1.Remembering The students were asked to recall the lesson they had
last meeting.
2. Comprehending The teacher asked the class to interpret the theme in
the short story that she read.
3. Applying The teacher had presented different issues
corresponding with audiovisual wherein the students
may able to internalize certain behavior of what the
theme is all about.
4. Analyzing The teacher asked the students to discriminate the
theme about the positive and negative behavior of the
short story.
5. Evaluating The students answered some short story guided
questions.
6. Creating Learners were asked about other theme that weren’t
mention that may use as a guide in real life scenarios.
OBSERVATION SHEET # 4.2
Levels of Processing Write down instances where Teacher made
learners to do any these.
1. Retrieval Information – Students gave information asked.
The teacher asked the learners about how they will
help the community by their own little way.
Mental procedures – Students determined if
information is accurate or inaccurate.
Students also were asked the difference between the
positive and negative side of not helping the
community.
Psychomotor procedure/ motor or physical skills –
Students executed/performed procedures.
The teacher asked one of the learners to demonstrate
on how they will help the community.
2. Comprehension
Students constructed symbolic representation of
information.
The learners were asked to draw to represent on how
they will help the community.
The students elaborate and discussed on how they will
help the community.
Levels of Processing Write down instances where Teacher made
learners to do any these.
3. Analysis The teacher asked them of what are the consequences
when they will not help the community.
The students write a summary of the benefits if they
will contribute to help especially the needy of the
community.
The students find out the positive side/results of they
will continue to help the community and negative
side/results if they will not participate to the
community to help.
The students are able to classify the positive side and
negative side/results of not or helping the community.
The students are able to compare and contrast the
cause and effects of helping the community especially
the needy ones.
4. Knowledge utilization The teacher is presenting some point of views or
situations via audiovisual in relation of helping the
community where learners are able to continuing
contribute their own part of helping.
The teacher made them act what they usually do and
ask them if it is consider in helping the community.
Levels of Processing Write down instances where Teacher made
learners to do any these.
The teacher helps the student to identify the problem
arise in the community as basis for their judgment.
The teacher helps the students to comprehend
scenarios and events that will help their judgment and
conclusion.
5. Meta-cognitive system The teacher helps the students to comprehend and
didn’t specified the lessons according to each learner
in a wholesome manner.
The teacher always monitor the student’s learning by
employing oral recitations in regards to the subject
matter.
Through rubrics from teacher as this will guide if the
students learned the subject matter or not.
Levels of Processing Write down instances where Teacher made
learners to do any these.
6. Self-System The teacher give emphasizes the importance and
functions of every topic.
The teacher encourages the students to engage in
social or community activities by helping from their
own little way.
The teacher motivates the students to create their own
cause in helping the community.
My Analysis
1. Were all Bloom’s levels of processing information demonstrated by the learners in the class? Why or why
not?
Not all Bloom's level of processing information demonstrated because there was a class I observed that they
only have a spelling throughout the period.
2. Which levels of Kendall’s and Marzano’s processing information was most demonstrated? least
demonstrated? Give proofs.
The most shown level of processing information was comprehension almost all the class that I observed
understand the lesson but unfortunately there is also the least demonstrated who the creation is.
3. Were all of Kendall’s and Marzano’s levels of processing of information, mental and physical procedures
demonstrated by the learners in class? Why or why not?
Not all, especially the metacognition and autosystem level of processing information were not observed It well
although there are two classes I have observed these two, but not really satisfactory for the student.
4. Which levels of Kendall’s and Marzano’s processing information was most demonstrated? Least
demonstrated? Give proofs.
The recovery was the most demonstrative process because all the classes that were observed remembered the
lesson and the least demonstrated was metacognitive and self-system that is out of focus in the classes.
5. Are Bloom’s cognitive taxonomy of learning activities (cognitive, affective and psychomotor) very different
from the new taxonomy of Kendall and Marzano (informative, metacognitve and psychomotor)? Explain your
answer.
No. The Bloom and Marzano are very similar. Its writing is almost exactly the same. Bloom’s uses nouns while
Marzanoòs uses the forms of verbs to show levels of learning. Marzano's categories are not built together. When
Bloom;s was created, it was a framework for teachers to use to focus on the thought of higher order. Marzanos
provides a more research-based theory to help teachers improve their student thinking. Group reflection.
My Reflections
Analyzing the level as of processing that were demonstrated by students in the classes that you observed, what
conclusion can you draw regarding the level of processing of information that takes place in schools? (Are all
the higher levels of processing information done in classrooms? or are classrooms limited mostly to the lower
levels of information processing such as remembering or retrieval?)
Bloom's level of processing was mostly presented in class. I see the teacher does things according to the level of
processing. She also had the ability to motivate the learners and draw attention to the class. I can also see that
she is doing her best to keep the class entertaining and pleasant. I learned that, on the basis of what I have
observed, I can conclude that mostly teacher on classes are focused only on the lowest levels of information
processing, such as the level of information such as remembering and comprehension. There are few of them
who have really tried to impose learning on students, but not to exert efforts that could allow students to
perform the entire given task. All I want to say is why students go to school because they wanted to learn and
how it could be possible if the teacher doesn't have the passion.
Write your reflections on the level of information processing among students in class. Does teacher contribute
to the level of processing that students do in school? If students are engaged only in low level information
processing, can teacher be blamed for such?
Yes, the teacher is to blame because they are the main movers within the class and the level of information
processing must begin inside then because they are the primary source of knowledge within the class. The
teacher encourages the class to remember the activities that each learner does in their own houses and
classifying them if it’s a good deed or a bad deed. She has presented many scenarios that are very common for
each learner and depending on their level of thinking. The least used level of cognitive information processing
is creation. She is more in the memory. As regards the level of information processing Kendall and Marzano, I
believe that most of them are presented and used in class. The teacher guides the class in decision-making, she
has also presented scenarios that are very common in every learner of daily life. Children learn a lot more when
they are interested in what they are doing and they have some input into what they are studying. Therefore,
using these various strategies teachers allow students to have some control over their education and to have a
high level of information processing. No child likes to be told everything he has to do; they like to be able to
make choices by himself.
Integrated Theory and Practice
Direction: Choose the letter of the correct answer.
1. Teacher Ruben wanted his students to rate their own work using scoring rubric which he explained to the
class before the students began with their task. Based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy, in which level of cognitive
processing are the students?
A. Evaluating
B. Synthesizing
C. Applying
D. Analyzing
Answer: A
2. You are required to formulate your own philosophy of education in the course, The Teaching Profession.
Based on Bloom’s revised taxonomy, in which level of cognitive processing are you?
A. Analyzing
B. Creating
C. Applying
D. Evaluating
Answer: B
3. Teacher Danny requires his class to conduct research, write a research report and defend the same before a
panel of experts. In which levels of processing will the students be engaged?
I. Retrieval
II. Comprehension
III. Analysis
IV. Knowledge utilizatio
A. I, II, III and IV
B. III and IV
C. II, III, and IV
D. I, III and IV
Answer: A
4. Teacher Bing encourages her students to make the intended learning outcome their own and explained that
she expected them to monitor now and then own processing will Teacher Bing’s students act?
A. Cognitive
B. Self-System
C. Metacognitive system
D. Between cognitive and metacognitive system
Answer: C
5. Teacher Ann sees to it that her sees the importance of the grammar lessons in English and so gets intrinsically
to learn. In which level of processing is the class expected to act?
A. Cognitive
B. Self-system
C. Metacognitive system
D. Between cognitive and metacognitive system
Answer: B
My Learning Portfolio
Based on the K to 12 Curriculum Guide, (for BEED students, subject of your choice; BSEd, your
specialization), write competencies that are fit for each of the following:
A. Bloom’s levels of processing a learning activity: (Just in case you can’t find one, make one). Give the other
levels of information processing not given.
1. Remembering
The teacher asked the students on what is the previous lesson they had discussed.
2. Comprehending
The teacher asked the students of what are function of an adjectives and how they will use it.
3. Applying
The teacher presented couple of describing words and ask to students to use it in constructing a sentence.
4. Analyzing
The teacher gives the task to students to determine what type of an adjective they used and explain it in the front
of the class.
5. Evaluating
The students had answered guided questions in regards to the subject matter.
6. Creating
The students were asked about what other function of an adjectives and how they will used in a daily life
conversation which they going to use in their real life situations.
B. Kendall’s and Marzano’s Levels of Processing Information: (Just in case you can’t find one, make one).
1. Retrieval
A. Information – The students were asked on how they will add the colors and daily conversation meaningful
with other people.
B. Mental Procedures – Students were asked the definition of an adjectives.
C. Psychomotor – Students were demonstrate on how to construct sentences which going to use in daily
conversation meaningful with the use of an adjectives.
2. Comprehension
Students were asked of what are the functions of an adjectives and how they going to use it.
3. Analysis
Students were asked of what are the advantages and disadvantages of using an adjective in a sentence.
4. Knowledge Utilization
The teacher present some situations or scenarios via audiovisual on how an adjectives will use to make daily
conversation more meaningful at the time they going to use it in their real life situations.
5. Metacognitive system
The teachers always monitors and check their comprehension regarding the subject matter through oral
recitation
6. Self-system
The teacher gives some point of view of what are the importances of an adjective in a sentence.

Recomendados

Episode 5 von
Episode 5Episode 5
Episode 5WALTERRAVAL1
24.8K views6 Folien
Field Study 2 Episode 2 Lesson Objectives As My Guiding Star von
Field Study 2 Episode 2 Lesson Objectives As My Guiding StarField Study 2 Episode 2 Lesson Objectives As My Guiding Star
Field Study 2 Episode 2 Lesson Objectives As My Guiding StarRuschelle Cossid
169.6K views5 Folien
Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 3 [2018] von
Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 3 [2018]Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 3 [2018]
Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 3 [2018]Mark Jhon Oxillo
70.8K views16 Folien
Episode 1 von
Episode 1Episode 1
Episode 1WALTERRAVAL1
4.9K views6 Folien
Field Study 2 Episode 5 von
Field Study 2 Episode 5Field Study 2 Episode 5
Field Study 2 Episode 5Jundel Deliman
99.2K views9 Folien
Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 2 [2018] von
Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 2 [2018]Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 2 [2018]
Field Study 2 (FS 2) - Episode 2 [2018]Mark Jhon Oxillo
130.8K views14 Folien

Más contenido relacionado

Was ist angesagt?

Fs 1 episode 5 von
Fs 1 episode 5Fs 1 episode 5
Fs 1 episode 5jordan132587
130.7K views8 Folien
Field study 1 episode 5 von
Field study 1 episode 5Field study 1 episode 5
Field study 1 episode 5Alexa Jean Colocado
85.5K views10 Folien
Field Study 1, Episode 5 "Individual Differences And Learner’s Interaction" von
Field Study 1, Episode 5 "Individual Differences And Learner’s Interaction"Field Study 1, Episode 5 "Individual Differences And Learner’s Interaction"
Field Study 1, Episode 5 "Individual Differences And Learner’s Interaction"Ruschelle Cossid
162.6K views6 Folien
Field Study 3 Episode 1 von
Field Study 3 Episode 1Field Study 3 Episode 1
Field Study 3 Episode 1Alexa Jean Colocado
117.6K views11 Folien
Field Study 3 Episode 7 von
Field Study 3 Episode 7Field Study 3 Episode 7
Field Study 3 Episode 7Jundel Deliman
147.1K views7 Folien
Field Study 2 Episode 6 von
Field Study 2 Episode 6Field Study 2 Episode 6
Field Study 2 Episode 6Jundel Deliman
65.8K views8 Folien

Was ist angesagt?(20)

Fs 1 episode 5 von jordan132587
Fs 1 episode 5Fs 1 episode 5
Fs 1 episode 5
jordan132587130.7K views
Field Study 1, Episode 5 "Individual Differences And Learner’s Interaction" von Ruschelle Cossid
Field Study 1, Episode 5 "Individual Differences And Learner’s Interaction"Field Study 1, Episode 5 "Individual Differences And Learner’s Interaction"
Field Study 1, Episode 5 "Individual Differences And Learner’s Interaction"
Ruschelle Cossid162.6K views
Field Study 3 Episode 7 von Jundel Deliman
Field Study 3 Episode 7Field Study 3 Episode 7
Field Study 3 Episode 7
Jundel Deliman147.1K views
Fs 1 episode 4 von jordan132587
Fs 1 episode 4Fs 1 episode 4
Fs 1 episode 4
jordan132587128.9K views
Field Study 1, Episode 4 "Individual Differences And Learner’s Interaction" von Ruschelle Cossid
Field Study 1, Episode 4 "Individual Differences And Learner’s Interaction"Field Study 1, Episode 4 "Individual Differences And Learner’s Interaction"
Field Study 1, Episode 4 "Individual Differences And Learner’s Interaction"
Ruschelle Cossid167.7K views
Fs 1 episode 4 individual differences and learners interaction von Noel Parohinog
Fs 1 episode 4 individual differences and learners interactionFs 1 episode 4 individual differences and learners interaction
Fs 1 episode 4 individual differences and learners interaction
Noel Parohinog172.7K views
FIeld Study 3 von Daryl Melo
FIeld Study 3FIeld Study 3
FIeld Study 3
Daryl Melo149.7K views
Fs 1 episode 3 classroom management and learning von Noel Parohinog
Fs 1 episode 3 classroom management and learningFs 1 episode 3 classroom management and learning
Fs 1 episode 3 classroom management and learning
Noel Parohinog200.3K views
FIELD STUDY (FS) 6 - EPISODE 3 (2018) von Mark Jhon Oxillo
FIELD STUDY (FS) 6 - EPISODE 3 (2018)FIELD STUDY (FS) 6 - EPISODE 3 (2018)
FIELD STUDY (FS) 6 - EPISODE 3 (2018)
Mark Jhon Oxillo18.2K views
Fs 1 episode 2 von jordan132587
Fs 1 episode 2Fs 1 episode 2
Fs 1 episode 2
jordan132587167.6K views
Field Study 2: FS2 Experiencing the Teaching- Learning Process von Jessa Arnado
Field Study 2: FS2 Experiencing the Teaching- Learning ProcessField Study 2: FS2 Experiencing the Teaching- Learning Process
Field Study 2: FS2 Experiencing the Teaching- Learning Process
Jessa Arnado273.2K views

Similar a Episode 4

Episode 3 von
Episode 3Episode 3
Episode 3WALTERRAVAL1
1.5K views7 Folien
Fs 1 episode 5 individual differences and learners interaction von
Fs 1 episode 5 individual differences and learners interactionFs 1 episode 5 individual differences and learners interaction
Fs 1 episode 5 individual differences and learners interactionNoel Parohinog
108.7K views5 Folien
Field study 1 episode 4 von
Field study 1 episode 4  Field study 1 episode 4
Field study 1 episode 4 SpeechTheatre
386 views6 Folien
FS 4 Exploring the Curriculum von
FS 4 Exploring the CurriculumFS 4 Exploring the Curriculum
FS 4 Exploring the CurriculumJamaica Olazo
110.6K views27 Folien
Instructional decision making von
Instructional decision making Instructional decision making
Instructional decision making Angy Lagos
300 views6 Folien
Philosophy about Individual Needs von
Philosophy about Individual NeedsPhilosophy about Individual Needs
Philosophy about Individual NeedsDonald Lance
159 views6 Folien

Similar a Episode 4(20)

Fs 1 episode 5 individual differences and learners interaction von Noel Parohinog
Fs 1 episode 5 individual differences and learners interactionFs 1 episode 5 individual differences and learners interaction
Fs 1 episode 5 individual differences and learners interaction
Noel Parohinog108.7K views
Field study 1 episode 4 von SpeechTheatre
Field study 1 episode 4  Field study 1 episode 4
Field study 1 episode 4
SpeechTheatre386 views
FS 4 Exploring the Curriculum von Jamaica Olazo
FS 4 Exploring the CurriculumFS 4 Exploring the Curriculum
FS 4 Exploring the Curriculum
Jamaica Olazo110.6K views
Instructional decision making von Angy Lagos
Instructional decision making Instructional decision making
Instructional decision making
Angy Lagos300 views
Philosophy about Individual Needs von Donald Lance
Philosophy about Individual NeedsPhilosophy about Individual Needs
Philosophy about Individual Needs
Donald Lance159 views
Teaching Strategies For Children With Disabilities von Adriana Wilson
Teaching Strategies For Children With DisabilitiesTeaching Strategies For Children With Disabilities
Teaching Strategies For Children With Disabilities
Adriana Wilson3 views
Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method von Jessen Felix
Affective Teaching Vs. Putin MethodAffective Teaching Vs. Putin Method
Affective Teaching Vs. Putin Method
Jessen Felix16.3K views
Fs2episode3 121013223231-phpapp01 von Christian Dumpit
Fs2episode3 121013223231-phpapp01Fs2episode3 121013223231-phpapp01
Fs2episode3 121013223231-phpapp01
Christian Dumpit11.3K views
Essay On Feasability Of Self-Assessment In ESL Classrooms von Monica Rivera
Essay On Feasability Of Self-Assessment In ESL ClassroomsEssay On Feasability Of Self-Assessment In ESL Classrooms
Essay On Feasability Of Self-Assessment In ESL Classrooms
Monica Rivera2 views

Último

Collective Bargaining and Understanding a Teacher Contract(16793704.1).pptx von
Collective Bargaining and Understanding a Teacher Contract(16793704.1).pptxCollective Bargaining and Understanding a Teacher Contract(16793704.1).pptx
Collective Bargaining and Understanding a Teacher Contract(16793704.1).pptxCenter for Integrated Training & Education
85 views57 Folien
The basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdf von
The basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdfThe basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdf
The basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdfJonathanCovena1
77 views1 Folie
Community-led Open Access Publishing webinar.pptx von
Community-led Open Access Publishing webinar.pptxCommunity-led Open Access Publishing webinar.pptx
Community-led Open Access Publishing webinar.pptxJisc
69 views9 Folien
Solar System and Galaxies.pptx von
Solar System and Galaxies.pptxSolar System and Galaxies.pptx
Solar System and Galaxies.pptxDrHafizKosar
79 views26 Folien
Plastic waste.pdf von
Plastic waste.pdfPlastic waste.pdf
Plastic waste.pdfalqaseedae
110 views5 Folien
Are we onboard yet University of Sussex.pptx von
Are we onboard yet University of Sussex.pptxAre we onboard yet University of Sussex.pptx
Are we onboard yet University of Sussex.pptxJisc
71 views7 Folien

Último(20)

The basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdf von JonathanCovena1
The basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdfThe basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdf
The basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdf
JonathanCovena177 views
Community-led Open Access Publishing webinar.pptx von Jisc
Community-led Open Access Publishing webinar.pptxCommunity-led Open Access Publishing webinar.pptx
Community-led Open Access Publishing webinar.pptx
Jisc69 views
Solar System and Galaxies.pptx von DrHafizKosar
Solar System and Galaxies.pptxSolar System and Galaxies.pptx
Solar System and Galaxies.pptx
DrHafizKosar79 views
Plastic waste.pdf von alqaseedae
Plastic waste.pdfPlastic waste.pdf
Plastic waste.pdf
alqaseedae110 views
Are we onboard yet University of Sussex.pptx von Jisc
Are we onboard yet University of Sussex.pptxAre we onboard yet University of Sussex.pptx
Are we onboard yet University of Sussex.pptx
Jisc71 views
Compare the flora and fauna of Kerala and Chhattisgarh ( Charttabulation) von AnshulDewangan3
 Compare the flora and fauna of Kerala and Chhattisgarh ( Charttabulation) Compare the flora and fauna of Kerala and Chhattisgarh ( Charttabulation)
Compare the flora and fauna of Kerala and Chhattisgarh ( Charttabulation)
AnshulDewangan3275 views
OEB 2023 Co-learning To Speed Up AI Implementation in Courses.pptx von Inge de Waard
OEB 2023 Co-learning To Speed Up AI Implementation in Courses.pptxOEB 2023 Co-learning To Speed Up AI Implementation in Courses.pptx
OEB 2023 Co-learning To Speed Up AI Implementation in Courses.pptx
Inge de Waard165 views
Structure and Functions of Cell.pdf von Nithya Murugan
Structure and Functions of Cell.pdfStructure and Functions of Cell.pdf
Structure and Functions of Cell.pdf
Nithya Murugan317 views
Psychology KS4 von WestHatch
Psychology KS4Psychology KS4
Psychology KS4
WestHatch62 views
The Open Access Community Framework (OACF) 2023 (1).pptx von Jisc
The Open Access Community Framework (OACF) 2023 (1).pptxThe Open Access Community Framework (OACF) 2023 (1).pptx
The Open Access Community Framework (OACF) 2023 (1).pptx
Jisc77 views
Psychology KS5 von WestHatch
Psychology KS5Psychology KS5
Psychology KS5
WestHatch68 views
Narration lesson plan.docx von TARIQ KHAN
Narration lesson plan.docxNarration lesson plan.docx
Narration lesson plan.docx
TARIQ KHAN99 views

Episode 4

  • 1. WALTER TORINO RAVAL BTVTED CSS 4A BANDURA FS 2 Episode 4 My Learning Activities I will observe 4 Resource Teachers with the use of Observation Sheets, analyze then reflect on my observation. OBSERVATION SHEET # 4.1 Bloom’ Levels of Processing Cognitive Activities Resource Teacher: Mrs. Violy E. Marzan, LPT Teacher’s Signature: School: Pilot Elementary School Date: September 23, 2021 Grade/ Year Level: Grade 6 Subject Area: Literature Bloom’s level of processing cognitive activities 1.Remembering The students were asked to recall the lesson they had last meeting. 2. Comprehending The teacher asked the class to interpret the theme in the short story that she read. 3. Applying The teacher had presented different issues corresponding with audiovisual wherein the students may able to internalize certain behavior of what the theme is all about. 4. Analyzing The teacher asked the students to discriminate the theme about the positive and negative behavior of the short story. 5. Evaluating The students answered some short story guided questions. 6. Creating Learners were asked about other theme that weren’t mention that may use as a guide in real life scenarios.
  • 2. OBSERVATION SHEET # 4.2 Levels of Processing Write down instances where Teacher made learners to do any these. 1. Retrieval Information – Students gave information asked. The teacher asked the learners about how they will help the community by their own little way. Mental procedures – Students determined if information is accurate or inaccurate. Students also were asked the difference between the positive and negative side of not helping the community. Psychomotor procedure/ motor or physical skills – Students executed/performed procedures. The teacher asked one of the learners to demonstrate on how they will help the community. 2. Comprehension Students constructed symbolic representation of information. The learners were asked to draw to represent on how they will help the community. The students elaborate and discussed on how they will help the community.
  • 3. Levels of Processing Write down instances where Teacher made learners to do any these. 3. Analysis The teacher asked them of what are the consequences when they will not help the community. The students write a summary of the benefits if they will contribute to help especially the needy of the community. The students find out the positive side/results of they will continue to help the community and negative side/results if they will not participate to the community to help. The students are able to classify the positive side and negative side/results of not or helping the community. The students are able to compare and contrast the cause and effects of helping the community especially the needy ones. 4. Knowledge utilization The teacher is presenting some point of views or situations via audiovisual in relation of helping the community where learners are able to continuing contribute their own part of helping. The teacher made them act what they usually do and ask them if it is consider in helping the community. Levels of Processing Write down instances where Teacher made learners to do any these. The teacher helps the student to identify the problem arise in the community as basis for their judgment. The teacher helps the students to comprehend scenarios and events that will help their judgment and conclusion.
  • 4. 5. Meta-cognitive system The teacher helps the students to comprehend and didn’t specified the lessons according to each learner in a wholesome manner. The teacher always monitor the student’s learning by employing oral recitations in regards to the subject matter. Through rubrics from teacher as this will guide if the students learned the subject matter or not. Levels of Processing Write down instances where Teacher made learners to do any these. 6. Self-System The teacher give emphasizes the importance and functions of every topic. The teacher encourages the students to engage in social or community activities by helping from their own little way. The teacher motivates the students to create their own cause in helping the community.
  • 5. My Analysis 1. Were all Bloom’s levels of processing information demonstrated by the learners in the class? Why or why not? Not all Bloom's level of processing information demonstrated because there was a class I observed that they only have a spelling throughout the period. 2. Which levels of Kendall’s and Marzano’s processing information was most demonstrated? least demonstrated? Give proofs. The most shown level of processing information was comprehension almost all the class that I observed understand the lesson but unfortunately there is also the least demonstrated who the creation is. 3. Were all of Kendall’s and Marzano’s levels of processing of information, mental and physical procedures demonstrated by the learners in class? Why or why not? Not all, especially the metacognition and autosystem level of processing information were not observed It well although there are two classes I have observed these two, but not really satisfactory for the student. 4. Which levels of Kendall’s and Marzano’s processing information was most demonstrated? Least demonstrated? Give proofs. The recovery was the most demonstrative process because all the classes that were observed remembered the lesson and the least demonstrated was metacognitive and self-system that is out of focus in the classes. 5. Are Bloom’s cognitive taxonomy of learning activities (cognitive, affective and psychomotor) very different from the new taxonomy of Kendall and Marzano (informative, metacognitve and psychomotor)? Explain your answer. No. The Bloom and Marzano are very similar. Its writing is almost exactly the same. Bloom’s uses nouns while Marzanoòs uses the forms of verbs to show levels of learning. Marzano's categories are not built together. When Bloom;s was created, it was a framework for teachers to use to focus on the thought of higher order. Marzanos provides a more research-based theory to help teachers improve their student thinking. Group reflection. My Reflections Analyzing the level as of processing that were demonstrated by students in the classes that you observed, what conclusion can you draw regarding the level of processing of information that takes place in schools? (Are all the higher levels of processing information done in classrooms? or are classrooms limited mostly to the lower levels of information processing such as remembering or retrieval?) Bloom's level of processing was mostly presented in class. I see the teacher does things according to the level of processing. She also had the ability to motivate the learners and draw attention to the class. I can also see that she is doing her best to keep the class entertaining and pleasant. I learned that, on the basis of what I have observed, I can conclude that mostly teacher on classes are focused only on the lowest levels of information processing, such as the level of information such as remembering and comprehension. There are few of them who have really tried to impose learning on students, but not to exert efforts that could allow students to perform the entire given task. All I want to say is why students go to school because they wanted to learn and how it could be possible if the teacher doesn't have the passion.
  • 6. Write your reflections on the level of information processing among students in class. Does teacher contribute to the level of processing that students do in school? If students are engaged only in low level information processing, can teacher be blamed for such? Yes, the teacher is to blame because they are the main movers within the class and the level of information processing must begin inside then because they are the primary source of knowledge within the class. The teacher encourages the class to remember the activities that each learner does in their own houses and classifying them if it’s a good deed or a bad deed. She has presented many scenarios that are very common for each learner and depending on their level of thinking. The least used level of cognitive information processing is creation. She is more in the memory. As regards the level of information processing Kendall and Marzano, I believe that most of them are presented and used in class. The teacher guides the class in decision-making, she has also presented scenarios that are very common in every learner of daily life. Children learn a lot more when they are interested in what they are doing and they have some input into what they are studying. Therefore, using these various strategies teachers allow students to have some control over their education and to have a high level of information processing. No child likes to be told everything he has to do; they like to be able to make choices by himself. Integrated Theory and Practice Direction: Choose the letter of the correct answer. 1. Teacher Ruben wanted his students to rate their own work using scoring rubric which he explained to the class before the students began with their task. Based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy, in which level of cognitive processing are the students? A. Evaluating B. Synthesizing C. Applying D. Analyzing Answer: A 2. You are required to formulate your own philosophy of education in the course, The Teaching Profession. Based on Bloom’s revised taxonomy, in which level of cognitive processing are you? A. Analyzing B. Creating C. Applying D. Evaluating Answer: B 3. Teacher Danny requires his class to conduct research, write a research report and defend the same before a panel of experts. In which levels of processing will the students be engaged? I. Retrieval II. Comprehension III. Analysis IV. Knowledge utilizatio A. I, II, III and IV B. III and IV C. II, III, and IV D. I, III and IV Answer: A
  • 7. 4. Teacher Bing encourages her students to make the intended learning outcome their own and explained that she expected them to monitor now and then own processing will Teacher Bing’s students act? A. Cognitive B. Self-System C. Metacognitive system D. Between cognitive and metacognitive system Answer: C 5. Teacher Ann sees to it that her sees the importance of the grammar lessons in English and so gets intrinsically to learn. In which level of processing is the class expected to act? A. Cognitive B. Self-system C. Metacognitive system D. Between cognitive and metacognitive system Answer: B My Learning Portfolio Based on the K to 12 Curriculum Guide, (for BEED students, subject of your choice; BSEd, your specialization), write competencies that are fit for each of the following: A. Bloom’s levels of processing a learning activity: (Just in case you can’t find one, make one). Give the other levels of information processing not given. 1. Remembering The teacher asked the students on what is the previous lesson they had discussed. 2. Comprehending The teacher asked the students of what are function of an adjectives and how they will use it. 3. Applying The teacher presented couple of describing words and ask to students to use it in constructing a sentence. 4. Analyzing The teacher gives the task to students to determine what type of an adjective they used and explain it in the front of the class. 5. Evaluating The students had answered guided questions in regards to the subject matter. 6. Creating The students were asked about what other function of an adjectives and how they will used in a daily life conversation which they going to use in their real life situations. B. Kendall’s and Marzano’s Levels of Processing Information: (Just in case you can’t find one, make one). 1. Retrieval A. Information – The students were asked on how they will add the colors and daily conversation meaningful with other people. B. Mental Procedures – Students were asked the definition of an adjectives. C. Psychomotor – Students were demonstrate on how to construct sentences which going to use in daily conversation meaningful with the use of an adjectives.
  • 8. 2. Comprehension Students were asked of what are the functions of an adjectives and how they going to use it. 3. Analysis Students were asked of what are the advantages and disadvantages of using an adjective in a sentence. 4. Knowledge Utilization The teacher present some situations or scenarios via audiovisual on how an adjectives will use to make daily conversation more meaningful at the time they going to use it in their real life situations. 5. Metacognitive system The teachers always monitors and check their comprehension regarding the subject matter through oral recitation 6. Self-system The teacher gives some point of view of what are the importances of an adjective in a sentence.