This document outlines Denise Newsome's response to a judge's ruling overruling her objections to a magistrate's decision in a civil eviction case brought against her by Anna Louise Inn. Newsome argues the court lacks jurisdiction for several reasons, including that service of process was incomplete as she is an out-of-state resident. She reiterates her intent to file criminal complaints against Anna Louise Inn and others for their role in the "criminal and civil wrongdoings" in the case. Newsome provides supporting arguments and cites statutes and case law regarding tenant rights and the requirements for service of process and jurisdiction.
09/03/14 - LACK OF JURISDICTION - RESPONSE TO 08/12/14 JUDGE RUSSELL ENTRY
1. H A M I L T O N C O U N T Y ( O H I O ) M U N I C I P A L C O U RT
ANNA LOUISE INN (Plaintiff)
vs. CIVIL ACTION: 14-CV-11786
DENISE NEWSOME (Defendant)
COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO ACT- SER VICE OF PROCESS INCOMPLETE
RESPONSE TO AUGUST 13, 2014 JUDGE HEATHER S. RUSSELL ENTRY-OVERRULING
DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S DECISION
REITERA TION OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO BE FILED
2. H A M I L T O N C O U N T Y (OHIO) M U N I C I P A L C O U RT
ANNA LOUISE INN (Plaintiff)
vs. CIVIL ACTION: 14-CV-11786
DENISE NEWSOME (Defendant)
COUR T LACKS JURISDICTION TO ACT- SER VICE OF PROCESS INCOMPLETE
RESPONSE TO AUGUST 13, 2014 JUDGE HEA THER S. RUSSELL ENTRY-OVERRULING
DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S DECISION
REITERATION OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO BE FILED
COMES NOW, Defendant Denise Newsome ("Newsome") WITHOUT WAIVER TO
JURISDICTION DEFENSE in that this Court LACKS JURISDICTION of the Subject Matter as well as
LACK JURISDICTION over Defendant Newsome as well as the defenses set forth in Defendant's:
A. NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE COUNTER-COMPLAINT OF
WHICH DAMAGES SOUGHT WILL EXCEED THE
JURISDICATION OF THIS COURT - MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE TO ALLOW REQUIRED TIME ALLOTTED
BY LAW FOR PLAINTIFF TO ANWER COUNTER-COMPLAINT
and FOR DEFENDANT TO PROVIDE A
REBUTTAL SHOULD PLAINTIFF FILE AN ANSWER TO
COUNTER-COMPLAINT - MOTION TO TRANSFER FOR
LACK OF JURISDICTION BECAUSE DAMAGES SOUGHT
WILL EXCEED THIS COURT'S JURISDICTION
GOOD FAITH NOTIFICATION TO PLAINTIFF ANNA
LOUISE INN TO WITHDRAW EVICTION ACTION BY
FRIDAY, MAY 30, 2014 (1:00 P.M.)
B. REQUEST COURT "UPDATE" CASE SCHEDULES OF THE
DOCKET; REQUEST FOR WRITTEN DETAILED DECISION
and, NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE "WRITTEN
OBJECTIONS" To This Court's JUNE 3, 20J4 DENIAL OF
CONTINUANCE Upon Receipt of Written Detailed Decision
and if required EXHAUST The APPEAL PROCESS Begmmng
With The Filing Of A NOTICE OF APPEAL; NOTICE OF
ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE FILING OF THIS LAWSUIT TO
THE PUBLIC/MEDL4
C. NOTICE OF NON-ATTENDANCE AT JUNE 13, 2014
HEARING DUE TO THE CONCERNS OF THREATS ON
DEFENDANT DENISE NEWSOME'S LIFE
D. EMERGENCY NOTICE OF APPEAL and STAY OF
EXECUTION JURY TRIAL TO BE DEMANDED
Page 1 of 13
3. E. EMERGENCY RESPONSE: OBJECTION(S) TO JUNE 18,
2014 ENTRY GRANTING STAY OF EXECUTION ON WRIT,
STA Y IS CONTINGENT UPON DEFT POSTING BOND IN THE
AMOUNT OF $396 PAYABLE 06-23-14 BEING RENT FOR
THE CURRENT MONTH, JUDGE/MAGISTRATE: ELLEN
WOLF A LIKE AMOUNT OF RENT IS REQUIRED TO BE
POSTED ON THE OF EACH MONTH HEREAFTER
DURING THIS APPEAL - ERRORS IN DECISION: THE
COMPUTATION OF BOND AMOUNT and DATE FOR
POSTING BOND IS CONTRARY TO STATUTES/MWS
GOVERNING SAID ATATTERS - i.e. HOWEVER, NOT
LIMITED TO THIS LIST ALONE
F. COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO ACT - SER VICE
OF PROCESS INCOMPLETE REQUEST FOR FINDINGS
OF FACT and CONCLUSION OF LAWS SUPPORTING THIS
COURT'S JUNE 13. 2014 DECISION/RULING; DEMAND
FOR NEW TRIAL and DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL - -
DEMAND THAT THIS COURT RESPECT THE
STATUTES/LAWS GOVERNING SAID MATTERS TO ALLOW
THE PROPER TIME FOR RESPONSIVE/REBUTTAL
PLEADINGS AND NOT OBSTRUCT THE ADMINISTRATION
OF JUSTICE IN FURTHER EFFORTS OF AIDING AND
ABETTING PLAINTIFF ANNA LOUISE INN IN THIS
LAWSUIT and PLAINTIFF'S CRIMINAL/CIVIL VIOLATIONS
AGAINST DEFENDANT DENISE NEWSOME
G. DEFENDANT DENISE NEWSOME'S MOTION TO
DISMISS
H. NOTICE OF NON-ATTENDANCE AT JULY 25, 2014
HEARING DUE TO THE CONCERNS OF THREATS ON
DEFENDANT DENISE NEWSOME'S and ATTORNEY
DAVID STENSON'S LIFE AS WELL AS DEFENDANT
DENISE NEWSOME'S FILING OF CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT OF AND AGAINST PI^INTIFF ANNA
LOUISE INN AND ITS CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS
IN CRIMINAL ACTS BEFORE THIS
COURT AS WELL AS CRIMINAL WRONGDOING BY THIS
COURT AND PLALNTIFF ANNA LOUISE INN AND
OTHERS ON OR ABOUT JUNE 30, 2014
I. COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO ACT - SER VICE
OF PROCESS INCOMPLETE RESPONSE TO JULY 25,
2014 MAGISTRATE DECISION REITERATION OF
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO BE FILED
J. COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO ACT - SER VICE
OF PROCESS INCOMPLETE RESPONSE TO AUGUST
Page 2 of 13
4. 11, 2014 MAGISTRATE TYRONE YATES ENTRY
REITERATION OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO BE
FILED
and fdes this, her:
COUR T LACKS JURISDICTION TO ACT- SER VICE OF PROCESS INCOMPLETE
RESPONSE TO AUGUST 13, 2014 JUDGE HEATHER S RUSSELL ENTRY-OVERRULING
DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRA EE'S DECISION
REITERATION OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO BE FILED
(hereinafter, "CourtLachsJurisdiction-081214JudgeRussellReMAGDecision"). This instant fihng is
filed in GOOD FAITH and for purposes of PRESERVING and PROTECTING Defendant Newsome's
Claims and Defenses in this instant matter as well as in future CRIMINAL and CIVIL Actions resulting
as a direct and proximate resuU of the injuries/harai Defendant Newsome has sustained and CONTINUES
to be subjected to as well as THREATS TO HER LIFE as a DIRECT and PROXIMATE result of
EXPOSING the CRIMINAL and CIVIL wrongs of the United States of America's President Barack
Obama, United States of America Congress, Supreme Court of the United States and their LEGAL
COUNSEL Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and others involved in the
CONSPIRACIES/CHAIN CONSPIRACIES targetmg Defendant Denise Newsome.
In fiirther support of this instant CourtLacksJurisdiction-0812I4JudgeRussellReMAGDecision,
Defendant Newsome, in accordance with die Statutes/Laws governing said matters undertakes the DUTY,
OBLIGATION and RESPONSIBILITY to make such Crimmal/Civil VIOLATIONS known to this Court
as well as the PUBLICAVORLD and, therefore, does so by stating:
(1) Under the Statutes/Laws governing said matters, Defendant has a duty and
responsibility to REPORT Criminal Acts - i.e. in which she does through this
instant pleading and her previous filings in this mstant lawsuit.
(2) UNCONTESTED: Is the fact that Plamtiff Anna Louise Inn is a
TRANSITIONAL dwelling - i.e. Inn, Hotel, Motel, etc.
(3) UNCONTESTED: Is die fact that Defendant Denise Newsome is a NONRESIDENT
of the State of Ohio.
(4) UNCONTESTED: Is the fact that at the TIME of the fding of Plaintiff Anna
Louise Inn's lawsuit in this instant action, it was KNOWN to said Plaintiff,
Defendant Denise Newsome is a NON-RESIDENT of the State of Ohio.
Page 3 of 13
5. (5) UNCONTESTED: Is the fact that Defendant Denise Newsome rented a Room
at the Anna Louise Inn while "CONTRACTING - i.e. engaging in
TEMPORARY Employment (EMPHASIS ADDED) - business in the State of
Ohio; however, she is NOT a RESIDENT of Ohio.
(6) Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure are CLEAR pursuant to Rule 4.3(A) PROCESS:
OUT-OF-STATE SERVICE, which states in part:
When service permitted. Service of process may be made outside of this state, as
provided in this mle, an any action in this state, upon a person who, AT THE
TIME OF SERVICE PROCESS, is a NONRESIDENT of this state . . .
(1) Transacting any business in this slate;
(2) Contracting to supply services. . . in this state. . .
Rl L E 4.3 Process: Out of State Service
(A) X'N'heu service permitted. Senice of process may be made outside of this state,
as pro"iclecl in this mlc. iii any action m this slate, upon a pei-oii -.vho, a* tJie nnie of scivice ot
process. IS a noaresjcleut of tins state or is a resident or this stale who is absent troiu this state.
"Person" includes an individual, an uidividiial's execiuor. admmistiator, or other personal
representative, or a coiporaiion. partnership, association, or any other legal or conunercia! entity,
who. actiiia directly oi' by an agent, has caused an event io occur out of which tlie claiai that is the
subject of the complaint arose, trom tiie person's:
(1) Transactma any business m this state;
(21 Contractuia to suppl;v senices or goods m this state:
(7) UNDISPUTED: Defendant Demse Newsome did NOT
VOLUNTARILY COMPLY with Vacation Request and/or Eviction demands
brought by Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn. It is a GOOD THING that die record of
this Court as well as the record of Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn will SUSTAIN
Defendant Newsome, TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY
CONTESTED Anna Louise Inn's Eviction Lawsuit as well as its and others
CRIMINAL/CIVIL wrongdoings leveled against her.
UNDISPUTED: Defendant Denise Newsome, TIMELY,
PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY NOTIFIED Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn, it
Representatives as well as this Couit that they were ENGAGING in
CRIMINAIJCivil wronsdoinss. To no avail! Defendant Newsome was
THREATENED with legal proceedings against her by Anna Louise Inn's
DIRECTOR OE OPERATION Robin Stanley and although Defendant
Newsome WARNED and/or CAUTIONED Stanley as well as Anna Louise
Inn's President/Chief Executive Officer Stephen T. MacConnell AGAINST
Page 4 of 13
6. makins such THREA TS to her, said Plaintiff did KNOWINGLY, WILLINGLY
and MALLCTOUSLYproceed to Imns a FRIVOLOUS Eviction Action of and
asainst Defendant Newsome as well as ENGAGE in committing FRAUD
UPON THE COURT and other CRIMES!
UNDISPUTED: Defendant made the proper DEFENSES to Aima
Louise hm's and this Court's CRIMINAL wrongdoings in the handling of this
instant Eviction Lawsuit against her. Therefore, providing Defendant Newsome
NOW - i.e. in that CRIMINAL ACTS have been ACCOMPLISHED and/or
CARRIED OUT - with the RIGHT to brmg the APPLICABLE CRIMINAL
Complaint as well as CIVIL Complaint of and against Plaintiff Anna Louise
Inn, this Court and others who ENGAGED in such legal wrongdoings:
65 Ohio Jur.3d § 164 - Notice to vacate; brinsins possessory
action:
A notice by the landlord that the tenancy is being
teiininated, combined with a demand by him or her for
possession of die premises, and voluntary compliance dierewith
by the tenant without protest, is not an eviction for which
damages may be recovered. (Greenberg v. Murphy, 16 Ohio
CD. 359, 1904 WL 1147 (Ohio Cn. Ct. 1904)). [Practice
Guide: If the tenant is rightfully in possession and entitled to
remain, the tenant SHOI1I.D AWAIT legal proceedings that are
threatened, and make defense thereto, RATHER THAN COMPLY
with the demand, and then bring an action for alleged
damages that perhaps never would have resulted.
(Greenberg)]
Where a tenant, upon request or notice to vacate,
VOLUNTARILY abandons the premises without protest, no
action for damages against the landlord, based on fraud or
misrepreseiitations as to the reasons for sue request can be
maintained under rights recognized by the common law, or
any statute of Ohio. {Ferguson v. Buddenberg, 87 Ohio App.
326, 42 Ohio Op. 488, 57 Ohio L. Abs. 473, 94 N.E.2d 568 (1''
Dist. Hamilton County 1950)).
In an eviction action for nonpayment of rent brought by a
landlord pursuant to RC Ch 1923, a tenant MAY mSPOND by
asserting any legal defense he has to that action, pursuant to RC
1923.061(A), and/or by fding a COUNTERCLAIM for
damages caused by the landlord's breach of the rental
agi'eement and/or the landlord's breach of his duties under RC
5321.04. Smith v. Wright (Oluo App. 1979) 65 Oluo App.2d
101, 416 N.E.2d 655, 19 0.0.3d 59.
A) REITERATION: HAmLTON COUNTY (OHIO)
MUNICIPAL COURT AND/OR ITS PUBLIC OFFICIALS (CLERK(S),
JUDGE(S), MAGISTRATE(S), DEPUTY(S), ETC.) HAVING
Page 5 of 13
7. KNOWLEDGE AND/OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN IT LACKED
JTJRTSDICTTON OVER THIS LAWSUIT:
(8) This Court and its Pubhc Officials (Clerks, Judges, Magistrates, Deputies, etc.)
LACK JURISDICTION OVER diis mstant lawsuit brought by Plaintiff Anna
Louise hin.
(9) Under the Statutes/Laws governing said matters, Service of Process was NOT
completed and neither has this Court's Clerk of Court VALIDATED service of
process as MANDATED hy the statute/laws uoverninti said matters to provide
this Court with Jurisdiction pursuant to Rule XXL Evictions of the Hamilton
County Ohio Municipal Court which states m part:
SERVICE PURSUANT TO SECTION 1923.06:
Where service is made by posting pursuant to RC. 1923.06(D)(2)(c) and the
ordinary mail mandated by R.C. 1923.06(C) is returned by the postal
authorities with an endorsement showing failure of delivery, service shall be
deemed complete under R.C. 1923.06(G)(2). Where service is by certified
mail, and the certified mail is returned for any reason, other than refused or
unclaimed, the case shall be presented to a judge or magistrate, as appropriate,
for a determination of whether service is complete. (Revised 4/29/08, Effective
5/12/08)
If service in an eviction action is not complete for any reason, the defendant
may nonetheless appear and waive service.
RlLEIXl
EVICTIONS
mia presaxT TO SECTION i9:.ii!6:
Wkre senice is icaiie k posting punuMi io R.C. 1923.06iDX2){c) and the ordinan- miO msndsied h R,C. 19L106{C) is remmed k the posui sMliorides mth sn endorseiBeiii shoiring failure af deliver, senice shall be
deemed compleie under R,C, 192JI6fGHl). ttere senice is by cenified mail, and the certified mail is reninied lei' any reason, other than refused or anclainied, she case shaU be prtsfuied to a jadje or magistrate, as
ipprapriaie, (or a deiemsiastion ofivhether serrite is complete. (Sensed 4/29(fiS. Efiectiie 5/12.IS)
If senice in an eiictioa sctioii is m complete for any reasra, ihe defendant may sonetheiess appear and waive serrice,
CUT & PASTED FROM: httiK//wwvv.hamihon-co.or2/municipalcourt/Civil Rules/rulel9 2S.htni#XX
As well as Statute 1923.06 of the Ohio Revised Code CLEARLY states m part:
1923.06 Summons - service of process.
(A) Any summons in an action, including a claim for possession, pursuant to
this chapter shall be issued. . . .
(B) Every summons issued under this section to recover residential premises
shall contain the following language printed in a conspicuous manner: "A
complaint to evict you has been filed with this court. No person shall be evicted
Page 6 of 13
8. unless the person's right to possession has ended and no person shall be evicted
in retaliation for the exercise of the person's lawful rights. I f you are depositing
rent with the clerk of this court you shall continue to deposit such rent until the
time of the court hearing. The failure to continue to deposit such rent may result
in your eviction. You may request a trial by jury. You have the right to seek
legal assistance. I f you cannot afford a lawyer, you may contact your local legal
aid or legal service office. I f none is available, you may contact your local bar
association."
(C) The clcik of the court in which a complaint to evict is filed shall mail
any summons by ordinary mail, along with a copy of the complaint.
document, or other process to be served, to the defendant at the address set forth
in the caption of the summons and to any address set forth in any written
instructions furnished to the clerk. The mailing sliail bc evidenced
by a certificate of mailing which the clerk shall
complete and file. . . .
L A W r / / g r ' Ohio Laws and R u l e s
Route: Ohio Reised Code >• T i t l e t i g ] XLX COURTS - MUXICIP.AL ^ MAYOR'S - C O U y n ' •> Chapter mzi.: FORCIBLE EXTRV ASD DET.A.I-NXR
1923.06 Summons - service of process.
{A; Any sumnnons m an action, including a claim for possession, pursuant to this chapter shall be issued, be in the form specified, and be served and returned as
provided in this section. Such service shale be at least seven days before the day set for trial,
(B) Every summons issued under this section to recover restdentiai premises shall contain the following language pnnted in a conspicuous manner; "A complaint
to evict you has been filed •,«/!th this court. No person shall be evicted unless the person's nght to possession has ended and no person shall be evicted in
retaliation for the exercise of the person's lawful nghts. If you are depositing rent with the clerk of this court you shall continue to deposit such rent until the
time of the court heanng. The failure to continue to deposit such rent may result in your eviction. You may request a tnal by jury. You have the right to seek
legal assistance, i f you carjnot afford a lawyer, you may contact your local legal aid or legal service office. If none is available, you may contact your local bar
association."
(C) The clerk of ttie court in which a complaint to evict is filed shall mail any summons by ordinary mail, along with a copy of the complaint document, or other
process to be served, to the defendant at the address set forth in the caption of the summons and to any address set forth in any wntten instructions
furnished to the clerk. The mailing shall be evidenced by a certificate of mailing which the clerk shall complete and file.
CUT & PASTED FROM:: htt|3:././codes.ohtO.gov./orc/1923.06
(10) REITERATION OF L A C K OF JURISDICTION:
Due to this Court's L.ACK OF
.JlJRISDICTIOsN over this instant Lawsuit, die
August 12, 2014 Judge Heather S. Russell's Entry
IS WORTH NEITHER the INK NOR
the PAPER it is ISSUED ON!"
Page 7 of 13
9. Furthennore, Judge Russell's
August 12, 2014 Entry! is
NULLA-'OID and CANNOT be
ENFORCED or UPHELD because
of this Court's LACKS
JURISDICTION'.
FURTHER SUPPORTING die
ONGOING of die CRIMINAL
CONSPIRACIES leveled against
Defendant Denise Newsome and the
STRING of Magistrates/Judges as
Purcell that CONTINUE to line up and
are to be ADDED to the CRIMINAL
Complaint to he filed!
We the people are the rightful masters of both
Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the
Constitutfon but to overthrow the men who
pervert the Constitution.
(Abraham Lincoln)
RoseubJooifi v. Menwnedia. //?£._ 91 S.Ct. i S J l ( 1 9 ' l ) - Fu^t
.lirteiidiiieiit protects all discussion and coniiiiiiiiicatioii
im'oh'ing inatwrs of public or °eneraJ concern MirJiotn resord
10 niuNiier vt'rson^ inroivt'd ,^?Y faiuoiis or (inonvniints. (Per
Mr, Justice Breminn witli the Chief Jii-Tice md one Ju-tice
joining in rlie opinion and vno Justices concurring m the
judgment.) U.S.C.A.Const. Aineiid. 1.
Teddy Roosevelt: ''Unless a man is honest we have no right to keep him
in public life, it matters not how brilliant his capacity, it hardly matters
how great his power of doing good service on certain lines may be... No
man who is corrupt, no man who condones corruption in others, can
possibly do his duty by the community.
Pages of 13
10. ANN.
UNDERSTANDING T H E
UISE INN EVICTION SCANDAL
ND THEIR R O L E S / 4 X J J ^ I * € C T I O NS
V.^r^^D OTHER c m ^ s ^ ^
THAT.LEADS TO THE '
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S WHITE HOUSE
(PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA),,
HIS LEGAL COUNSEL
http://'www.slideshai'e.net-Vog&lDemse./OTOTH-obamafraudgate-
comiection-to-the-annalouiseinn-eviction-scandal-
36698826
Just think, 0. J. Sunpson received approximately 33 YEARS for allegedly engaging in
CRIMINAL activities in the retrieval of his propeity. So just imagine what CRIMES v^ere coimnitted
when Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn, this Court and their CRIMINAL COHORTS/CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS
committed criminal acts as ~ i.e. may this Court as well as Plaintiff do then
HOMEWORK in regaids to the FOLLOWING possible Counts to be included m the CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT against them:
• Conspiracy
• Fraud Upon The Court
• Public Corruption
• Complicity
• Corruption
• Aiding & Abetting
• Extortion
• Bribery
• Coercion
• Retaliation
• Pattern-Of-Conduct
• Intiraidation
• Deprivation of Rights
• Power/FaOure To Prevent
• Stalking/Menacing By
Stalking
• Burglary and Breaking &
Entering
• Theft
• Criminal Trespass
• Larceny
• Invasion
• Unlawful En try/Forcible
Actions
• Obstruction of
Justice/Sei-vice of Process
• Conspiracy Against Rights
• Conspiracy To Interfere
With CivU Rights
• Violation of Code of
Judicial Conduct
Page 9 of 13
12. • ^ s l t d o s h a r e
four SiiaeShare stats from las: I'.'eek
Total Stats vv^e*!, CMP.J*
S26K -tK 96K • 40
IK.;, 65 52
; : 71
Most vie wed this week
Chinese (traditional) 040412
; "EH*" •
NEWT GINGRICH - Wikipedia Information
PAT T I l l M AN • Wikipedia Info (U.S. Government C0VER4.Jp Of
Killing/Murdef)
mmAm 08/1 Mil • OBJECTION(S) TO 08/02/12 ORDER BY JUDGE TOM S. ir.si... u
I f j t i j r l j SMSL lEF. - M o t i o n To Disqualify
MOTION TO STRIKE - M o t i o n To Stay (PKH)
13. FOREIGN/INTERNATIONAL Nations/Leaders/Citizens also KNOW HOW STUPID United
States of America's President Barack Obama is! WHY DO YOU THINK THEY ARE
LAUGHING! It helps to EXPOSE WHO is RUNNING the United States of America's
TERRORIST/WHITE SUPREMACIST Regime, WHERE they are HIDING and HOW they
OPERATE! No Defendant Newsome is LOOKING GOOD in the EYES of the PUBLICAVORLD!
HOW STUPID IS STUPID?
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE
THAT: for the above and forgoing reasons, m the INTEREST OF JUSTICE, PROTECTION OF
LIVES, as well as the statutes/laws governing said matters, the August 11, 2014, Magistrate Entry
entered by this Court is NULL/VOID for LACK OF JURISDICTION and other statutes/laws governing
said matters! Furthermore, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, diat Defendant Denise
Newsome is filing a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT of and against Plaintiff Anna Louise
Inn, its Representatives, Hamilton County Court Officials (i.e. Clerk of Court Tracy
Winkler, Judge Heather Russell, Magistrates: Deborah Casey, Melissa E. West,
Page 12 of 13
14. Ellen Wolf, Jacqueline Purnell, Tyrone Yates, Deputy Bailiff Mike Garvey, etc. - i.e.
as it appears the list may continue to grow with this Court's Public Officials) and
others PARTY to the Conspiracy(s)/Chain Conspiracy(s) and other Crimes leveled
against her so said Plaintiffs and Public Officials' WILLFUL, MALICIOUS and
WANTON acts in the Crimes committed of and against Defendant Denise Newsome.
Furthennore, CONFLICT-OF-INTERESTS exist as well as the PUBLIC-AT-LARGE has been
ENDANGERED by such Criminal Acts that Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn as well as Public Officers of the
Hamilton County (Ohio) Municipal Court are engaging m. Therefore, WARRANTEVG the ARRESTS,
LNDICTMENTS, INVESTIGATIONS and PROSECUTIONS that are sought through Defendant
Denise Newsome's CRIMINAL COMPLAINT!
Respectfully submitted this 3"^*^ day of September, 2014.
Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, MS 39286
Phone: (513) 680-2922 or (601) 885-9536
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Notice is hereby given that in GOOD-FAITH that a true and correct copy of the above pleadmg is
being FAXED and/or MAILED to the following in that Legal Counsel for Plaintiff Anna Louise Inn
(from the Docket) is NOT clear (contact infomiation is NOT provided):
ANNA LOUISE INN - FAX: (513) 768-6922
do Stephen T. MacConnell (President/CEO)
300 Lytle Street
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Respectfully submitted this ^ day of September, 2014.
Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, MS 39286
Phone: (513) 680-2922 or (601) 885-9536
Page 13 of 13
15. FACSIMILE COVER PAGE
TO: Hamilton County (OH) Municipal Court (513) 946-5710
Anna Louise Inn/Stephen T. MacConnell (513) 768-6922
DATE: September 3,2014
FROM: Denise Newsome (513) 680-2922 or (601) 885-9536
NO. PAGES: 14 (Including Cover Page)
H A M I L T O N C O U N T Y (OHIO) M U N I C I P A L C O U RT
ANNA LOUISE INN (Plaintiff)
vs. CIVIL ACTION: I4-CV-1I786
DENISE NEWSOME (Defendant)
COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO ACT- SER VICE OF PROCESS INCOMPLETE
RESPONSE TO AUGUST 13, 2014 JUDGE HEATHER S. RUSSELL ENTRY-OVERRULING
DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE'S DECISION
REITERA TION OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO BE FILED
16. L a s t T r a n s m i s s i o n PAGE. 1/ 1
Sep.03.2014 05:29 AM
Name :
T e l :
Date Time Type ID
Sep.03 05:22AM Send 15139465710
D u r a t i o n Pages R e s u lt
06:11 14 OK
17. L a s t T r a n s m i s s i o n PAGE. 1/ 1
Sep.03.2014 05:40 AM
Name :
T e l :
Date Time Type ID
Sep.03 05:33AM Send 15137686922
Duration Pages R e s u lt
06:39 14 OK