SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
Cognitive Learning Theory
Key Points

 Emerges as a reaction to Behaviorism’s theory in the 1960s
  rejecting the idea that people only respond to environmental
  stimuli, like “programmed animals”.

 States that human beings are rational, and learning is a
  complex mechanism that encompasses certain mental
  processes similar to a computer:
          Information goes in.
          It is processed.
          There is an outcome.


 People’s actions are a consequence of thinking, and the
  changes observed in their behavior are the product of what
  goes on inside their heads (Shelley et al., 2012, p. 261)
Famous Cognitivists

Allan Paivio:
 He developed the Dual Coding Theory that assumes that people
  process information in two different ways:
         Processing of images
         Processing of language.

 There are three sub-processes:
         Representational: verbal and non-verbal representations are influenced
          directly.
         Referential: verbal system is activated by non-verbal communication and vice
          versa.
         Associative: both, text based systems and graphic representations can
          trigger mental association.

 Became the basis of subsequent educational theories                   (Shelley et
al., 2012, p.p. 261-62).
Famous Cognitivists

Robert Cagne:
   He created cognitive learning hierarchies which involve development of skills
    based on a building-block principle.

   Categories of Learning Outcomes:
         Verbal information.
         Intellectual skills.
         Cognitive strategies.
         Motor skills.
         Attitudes.

   Nine Events of Instruction:
         Gain attention of learners.
         Inform learners of the objective.
         Stimulate recall of prior learning.
         Present lesson.
         Provide instruction,
         Elicit Performance
         Provide feedback.
         Assess performance.
         Enhance retention and transfer.
                                                Courtesy of Chris Carey. Pics4Learning.com

(Shelley et al., 2012, p. 262-63)
Famous Cognitivists

Howard Gardner:
   Harvard Professor who developed the Multiple Intelligences Theory
    which recognizes 8 different types:
        Logical-Mathematical.
        Linguistic.
        Bodily-Kinesthetic.
        Musical.
        Spatial.
        Interpersonal.
        Intrapersonal.
        Naturalist.


 He re-defined the term intelligence as “ the capacity to solve problems
or to fashion products that are valued in one or more cultural settings”.

 This theory has caused to many educators to redesign the curricula in
order to fit the different students’ intelligences. (Miller &
Zitterman, 2009, p.p. 38-9)
Famous Cognitivists

Benjamin Bloom:
   Educational psychologist who classified learning into 3 different
    domains:
        Cognitive:   what the student knows and how organizes ideas and thoughts.
        Affective:   student’s emotions, attitudes, interests, attention, and awareness.
        Psychomotor: student’s motor skills and physical abilities.


 The six levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy:
        Evaluation.
        Synthesis.
        Analysis.
        Application.
        Comprehension.
        Knowledge
                                                     (Shelley et al., 2012, p.p. 265-66)
Classroom Implications

   Many teachers are very aware of the importance of making an
    assessment of their students’ learning styles so they can identify
    their strengths and preferences when it comes to acquiring
    knowledge.

   Lesson plans and class activities should be the product of careful
    planning where the instructor tries to implement different tools to
    engage as many students as possible based on their leaning styles.

   Whether the lessons include the use of technology such as smart
    board, power point presentations, use of different educational
    software in classroom computers or media center, or no technology
    tools are available, the teacher can use different activities
    outdoors, drawing, songs, pictures, maps, etc., in order to engage
    students.
Classroom Implications

   Teachers should try to incorporate Cagne’s Nine Events of
    Instruction into their lesson plans in order to make the internal
    process of learning become optimal for the student, especially if
    there is access to technology that can capture their attention.

   At the same time the teacher needs to create a physical
    environment conducive to an educational atmosphere that fosters
    or encourages the knowledge acquisition process.

   By using Scaffolding and considering what the students already
    know and what they should learn, teachers create lesson plans that
    use Bloom’s Taxonomy levels in order to make them develop problem
    solving and critical thinking skills, and not only regurgitate
    information.
What students do

 Students’ educational process does not end at the level of
  knowledge and comprehension. Thanks to the use of Bloom’s
  Taxonomy when designing lesson plans, they are able to take the
  learning process even further. They are taught to
  analyze, synthesize and evaluate information. In other
  words, they learn to use Critical Thinking, which enables them
  to apply the knowledge acquired in any situation.

 Students feel engaged and interested, whether technology is
  available or not, because of the multiple intelligences approach
  that is given to the lesson plan, making sure everybody is
  participating in the process.

 Technology helps to take the process much more easily to the
  Analysis level and entices students to stay interested and
  involved.
What I Think

 Traditional approaches to education do not seem to be
  engaging enough for our technology driven kids.

    Some teachers do not realize the fact that some lesson
    plans only cover the first 2 level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.

    As educators it is our responsibility to keep up the pace
    with new learning theories and technology available out
    there in order to make sure our kids develop the skills
    needed to compete in a highly competitive and technology
    driven world.

 By using the Cognitivist approach in education we are making
  sure our kids grow up to be creative, critical thinkers and
  problem solvers.

More Related Content

What's hot

Adult learning
Adult learningAdult learning
Adult learningRASH2001
 
EDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Meenakshi Uberoi
EDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Meenakshi UberoiEDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Meenakshi Uberoi
EDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Meenakshi UberoiEduexcellence
 
Learning theories and their implications on educational technology
Learning theories  and their implications on educational technologyLearning theories  and their implications on educational technology
Learning theories and their implications on educational technologyRONNIE PASIGUI
 
Pedagogical leadership handbook
Pedagogical leadership handbookPedagogical leadership handbook
Pedagogical leadership handbookTeachconnect
 
Cognitivism Theory
Cognitivism TheoryCognitivism Theory
Cognitivism Theorysmith_leanne
 
[BIS] Intro to PYP For Parents Sept 2012
[BIS] Intro to PYP For Parents Sept 2012[BIS] Intro to PYP For Parents Sept 2012
[BIS] Intro to PYP For Parents Sept 2012irfansatria
 
Active learning for the adult classroom dg naeyc
Active learning for the adult classroom dg naeycActive learning for the adult classroom dg naeyc
Active learning for the adult classroom dg naeycStella Baker
 
The Creative Curriculum Model (Diane Trister Dodge, 1988)
The Creative Curriculum Model (Diane Trister Dodge, 1988)The Creative Curriculum Model (Diane Trister Dodge, 1988)
The Creative Curriculum Model (Diane Trister Dodge, 1988)Christina Sookdeo
 
Types of Early Childhood Curricula by Arianny Calcagno, M.Ed.
Types of Early Childhood Curricula by Arianny Calcagno, M.Ed.Types of Early Childhood Curricula by Arianny Calcagno, M.Ed.
Types of Early Childhood Curricula by Arianny Calcagno, M.Ed.Arianny Calcagno
 
EDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Madhav Rao
EDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Madhav RaoEDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Madhav Rao
EDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Madhav RaoEduexcellence
 
Class sessions 8 motivation and learning 3 28-19
Class sessions 8 motivation and learning 3 28-19Class sessions 8 motivation and learning 3 28-19
Class sessions 8 motivation and learning 3 28-19tjcarter
 
Cognitive Development Through the Curriculum
Cognitive Development Through the CurriculumCognitive Development Through the Curriculum
Cognitive Development Through the Curriculumsower
 
Adult learning (3)
Adult learning (3)Adult learning (3)
Adult learning (3)Reham Ismail
 

What's hot (19)

Adult Learning
Adult LearningAdult Learning
Adult Learning
 
Adult learning
Adult learningAdult learning
Adult learning
 
111
111111
111
 
Chapter 01
Chapter 01Chapter 01
Chapter 01
 
EDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Meenakshi Uberoi
EDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Meenakshi UberoiEDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Meenakshi Uberoi
EDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Meenakshi Uberoi
 
Learning theories and their implications on educational technology
Learning theories  and their implications on educational technologyLearning theories  and their implications on educational technology
Learning theories and their implications on educational technology
 
Pedagogical leadership handbook
Pedagogical leadership handbookPedagogical leadership handbook
Pedagogical leadership handbook
 
Dap ppt
Dap pptDap ppt
Dap ppt
 
Cognitivism Theory
Cognitivism TheoryCognitivism Theory
Cognitivism Theory
 
Designing the Early Years Curriculum
Designing the Early Years CurriculumDesigning the Early Years Curriculum
Designing the Early Years Curriculum
 
[BIS] Intro to PYP For Parents Sept 2012
[BIS] Intro to PYP For Parents Sept 2012[BIS] Intro to PYP For Parents Sept 2012
[BIS] Intro to PYP For Parents Sept 2012
 
Active learning for the adult classroom dg naeyc
Active learning for the adult classroom dg naeycActive learning for the adult classroom dg naeyc
Active learning for the adult classroom dg naeyc
 
The Creative Curriculum Model (Diane Trister Dodge, 1988)
The Creative Curriculum Model (Diane Trister Dodge, 1988)The Creative Curriculum Model (Diane Trister Dodge, 1988)
The Creative Curriculum Model (Diane Trister Dodge, 1988)
 
Types of Early Childhood Curricula by Arianny Calcagno, M.Ed.
Types of Early Childhood Curricula by Arianny Calcagno, M.Ed.Types of Early Childhood Curricula by Arianny Calcagno, M.Ed.
Types of Early Childhood Curricula by Arianny Calcagno, M.Ed.
 
EDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Madhav Rao
EDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Madhav RaoEDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Madhav Rao
EDUCARNIVAL 2016 at IIT DELHI - Presentation by Madhav Rao
 
Class sessions 8 motivation and learning 3 28-19
Class sessions 8 motivation and learning 3 28-19Class sessions 8 motivation and learning 3 28-19
Class sessions 8 motivation and learning 3 28-19
 
Problem Solving In The Collaborative Classroom
Problem Solving In The Collaborative ClassroomProblem Solving In The Collaborative Classroom
Problem Solving In The Collaborative Classroom
 
Cognitive Development Through the Curriculum
Cognitive Development Through the CurriculumCognitive Development Through the Curriculum
Cognitive Development Through the Curriculum
 
Adult learning (3)
Adult learning (3)Adult learning (3)
Adult learning (3)
 

Similar to Cognitive learning theory by Viviana Abbati

Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive TheoryLearning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive TheoryStephanie Conway
 
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive TheoryLearning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive TheoryStephanie Conway
 
GR 2-parent-orientation-ay-2022-23.pptx
GR 2-parent-orientation-ay-2022-23.pptxGR 2-parent-orientation-ay-2022-23.pptx
GR 2-parent-orientation-ay-2022-23.pptxTAMILSELVANNPDADMIB
 
Learning theories edtech
Learning theories edtechLearning theories edtech
Learning theories edtechRONNIE PASIGUI
 
Instructional Design
Instructional DesignInstructional Design
Instructional DesignHollomant6030
 
Teresa B. - Cognitivism
Teresa B. - CognitivismTeresa B. - Cognitivism
Teresa B. - Cognitivismmandysmama
 
Mini project 2-- teaching and learning theories spring 2015
Mini project 2-- teaching and learning theories spring 2015Mini project 2-- teaching and learning theories spring 2015
Mini project 2-- teaching and learning theories spring 2015jistudents
 
Learning artifact on paradigms
Learning artifact on paradigmsLearning artifact on paradigms
Learning artifact on paradigmssahutchins74
 
Theory into practice
Theory into practiceTheory into practice
Theory into practicejhtrespa
 
Philosophical inquiry and Reflective Teaching
Philosophical inquiry and Reflective TeachingPhilosophical inquiry and Reflective Teaching
Philosophical inquiry and Reflective Teachingjagannath Dange
 
Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology
Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating TechnologyAchieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology
Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating TechnologyAnn Kovalchick
 

Similar to Cognitive learning theory by Viviana Abbati (20)

Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive TheoryLearning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
 
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive TheoryLearning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
Learning Theories Group Project: Cognitive Theory
 
Constructivism
ConstructivismConstructivism
Constructivism
 
Mi gr2 wk2v3
Mi gr2 wk2v3Mi gr2 wk2v3
Mi gr2 wk2v3
 
Mi gr2 wk2v2
Mi gr2 wk2v2Mi gr2 wk2v2
Mi gr2 wk2v2
 
GR 2-parent-orientation-ay-2022-23.pptx
GR 2-parent-orientation-ay-2022-23.pptxGR 2-parent-orientation-ay-2022-23.pptx
GR 2-parent-orientation-ay-2022-23.pptx
 
Is db
Is dbIs db
Is db
 
Learning theories edtech
Learning theories edtechLearning theories edtech
Learning theories edtech
 
Meda 5700_Ch1
Meda 5700_Ch1Meda 5700_Ch1
Meda 5700_Ch1
 
Instructional Design
Instructional DesignInstructional Design
Instructional Design
 
Teresa B. - Cognitivism
Teresa B. - CognitivismTeresa B. - Cognitivism
Teresa B. - Cognitivism
 
Mini project 2-- teaching and learning theories spring 2015
Mini project 2-- teaching and learning theories spring 2015Mini project 2-- teaching and learning theories spring 2015
Mini project 2-- teaching and learning theories spring 2015
 
Learning artifact on paradigms
Learning artifact on paradigmsLearning artifact on paradigms
Learning artifact on paradigms
 
Module13
Module13Module13
Module13
 
Theory into practice
Theory into practiceTheory into practice
Theory into practice
 
Philosophical inquiry and Reflective Teaching
Philosophical inquiry and Reflective TeachingPhilosophical inquiry and Reflective Teaching
Philosophical inquiry and Reflective Teaching
 
Cognitivism
CognitivismCognitivism
Cognitivism
 
Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology
Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating TechnologyAchieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology
Achieving Learning Outcomes, Incorporating Technology
 
Learning theory
Learning theoryLearning theory
Learning theory
 
Timkang, ma. christine c.
Timkang, ma. christine c.Timkang, ma. christine c.
Timkang, ma. christine c.
 

Cognitive learning theory by Viviana Abbati

  • 2. Key Points  Emerges as a reaction to Behaviorism’s theory in the 1960s rejecting the idea that people only respond to environmental stimuli, like “programmed animals”.  States that human beings are rational, and learning is a complex mechanism that encompasses certain mental processes similar to a computer:  Information goes in.  It is processed.  There is an outcome.  People’s actions are a consequence of thinking, and the changes observed in their behavior are the product of what goes on inside their heads (Shelley et al., 2012, p. 261)
  • 3. Famous Cognitivists Allan Paivio:  He developed the Dual Coding Theory that assumes that people process information in two different ways:  Processing of images  Processing of language.  There are three sub-processes:  Representational: verbal and non-verbal representations are influenced directly.  Referential: verbal system is activated by non-verbal communication and vice versa.  Associative: both, text based systems and graphic representations can trigger mental association.  Became the basis of subsequent educational theories (Shelley et al., 2012, p.p. 261-62).
  • 4. Famous Cognitivists Robert Cagne:  He created cognitive learning hierarchies which involve development of skills based on a building-block principle.  Categories of Learning Outcomes:  Verbal information.  Intellectual skills.  Cognitive strategies.  Motor skills.  Attitudes.  Nine Events of Instruction:  Gain attention of learners.  Inform learners of the objective.  Stimulate recall of prior learning.  Present lesson.  Provide instruction,  Elicit Performance  Provide feedback.  Assess performance.  Enhance retention and transfer. Courtesy of Chris Carey. Pics4Learning.com (Shelley et al., 2012, p. 262-63)
  • 5. Famous Cognitivists Howard Gardner:  Harvard Professor who developed the Multiple Intelligences Theory which recognizes 8 different types:  Logical-Mathematical.  Linguistic.  Bodily-Kinesthetic.  Musical.  Spatial.  Interpersonal.  Intrapersonal.  Naturalist.  He re-defined the term intelligence as “ the capacity to solve problems or to fashion products that are valued in one or more cultural settings”.  This theory has caused to many educators to redesign the curricula in order to fit the different students’ intelligences. (Miller & Zitterman, 2009, p.p. 38-9)
  • 6. Famous Cognitivists Benjamin Bloom:  Educational psychologist who classified learning into 3 different domains:  Cognitive: what the student knows and how organizes ideas and thoughts.  Affective: student’s emotions, attitudes, interests, attention, and awareness.  Psychomotor: student’s motor skills and physical abilities.  The six levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy:  Evaluation.  Synthesis.  Analysis.  Application.  Comprehension.  Knowledge (Shelley et al., 2012, p.p. 265-66)
  • 7. Classroom Implications  Many teachers are very aware of the importance of making an assessment of their students’ learning styles so they can identify their strengths and preferences when it comes to acquiring knowledge.  Lesson plans and class activities should be the product of careful planning where the instructor tries to implement different tools to engage as many students as possible based on their leaning styles.  Whether the lessons include the use of technology such as smart board, power point presentations, use of different educational software in classroom computers or media center, or no technology tools are available, the teacher can use different activities outdoors, drawing, songs, pictures, maps, etc., in order to engage students.
  • 8. Classroom Implications  Teachers should try to incorporate Cagne’s Nine Events of Instruction into their lesson plans in order to make the internal process of learning become optimal for the student, especially if there is access to technology that can capture their attention.  At the same time the teacher needs to create a physical environment conducive to an educational atmosphere that fosters or encourages the knowledge acquisition process.  By using Scaffolding and considering what the students already know and what they should learn, teachers create lesson plans that use Bloom’s Taxonomy levels in order to make them develop problem solving and critical thinking skills, and not only regurgitate information.
  • 9. What students do  Students’ educational process does not end at the level of knowledge and comprehension. Thanks to the use of Bloom’s Taxonomy when designing lesson plans, they are able to take the learning process even further. They are taught to analyze, synthesize and evaluate information. In other words, they learn to use Critical Thinking, which enables them to apply the knowledge acquired in any situation.  Students feel engaged and interested, whether technology is available or not, because of the multiple intelligences approach that is given to the lesson plan, making sure everybody is participating in the process.  Technology helps to take the process much more easily to the Analysis level and entices students to stay interested and involved.
  • 10. What I Think  Traditional approaches to education do not seem to be engaging enough for our technology driven kids.  Some teachers do not realize the fact that some lesson plans only cover the first 2 level of Bloom’s Taxonomy.  As educators it is our responsibility to keep up the pace with new learning theories and technology available out there in order to make sure our kids develop the skills needed to compete in a highly competitive and technology driven world.  By using the Cognitivist approach in education we are making sure our kids grow up to be creative, critical thinkers and problem solvers.