Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.

PDA in theory and practice

1.453 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

Veröffentlicht in: Bildung, Business
  • Als Erste(r) kommentieren

  • Gehören Sie zu den Ersten, denen das gefällt!

PDA in theory and practice

  1. 1. September 22, 2011<br /><ul><li>Library / Peter van Laarhoven</li></ul>PDA in theory and practice <br />Some comments<br />on Rick Anderson<br />
  2. 2. September 22, 2011<br />Summary in advance<br />(low) circulation is not a strong argument for PDA<br />(high) selection cost/time ís<br />PDA can be suitable for (a significant) part of our patrons’ book needs<br />PDA is not likely to be cheaper<br />the DRM entailed by current PDA practice is in the way of optimal use & usability<br />putting your stakes on PDA-with-DRM ignores the growing tensions in academic book publishing.<br />
  3. 3. September 22, 2011<br />Personal note<br />I limit myself to books<br />Premiss: “the (current) collection is a bad guess at patron needs”<br />circulation is low (waste of money)<br />circulation is falling (‘down dramatically’)<br />U of Groningen<br />circulation is not low<br />10% – 15% not checked out after 10 years (+do not forget on-site use)<br />5 -10 average # of loans of 10 year old books<br />circulation is <br />not falling in total<br />moderately falling per student (growth of the university).<br />
  4. 4. September 22, 2011<br />Book selection by librarians, I agree,<br />ís costly, but mainly in terms of librarian time spent<br />and therefore relatively inefficient,<br />but not for all (types of) books<br />Types of academic books (≈ submarkets, business models)<br />reference works<br />textbooks<br />general intellectual record (<> public libraries)<br />books for student/faculty research<br />PDA: suitable for the latter (big) category<br />low ratio of budget : book supply<br />selection is guesswork indeed<br />
  5. 5. September 22, 2011<br />Expectation (wish): PDA will<br />better reflect patron needs -> OK<br />be cheaper(in times of decreasing book budgets)<br />Experience<br />budgets depleted in months/weeks (-> LIS literature)<br />U of Groningen ‘simulation’ <br />ebrary H&PS: 6,600 e-books with imprint 2006- (plus 7,000 older books)<br />corresponding book budget ± € 35,000<br />books opened after 12 months: 1,321<br />autopurchase at 20 ‘pageviews’<br />586 books for € 34,494 after 12 months<br />autopurchase at 10 ‘pageviews’<br />596 books for € 34,272 after 9 months<br />808 books for € 46,959 after 12 months<br />
  6. 6. September 22, 2011<br />PDA == e-books with DRM(digital rights management)<br />+ allows title-by-title purchase<br />+ avoids e-book packages of (commercial) publishers<br />- usability crippled by design<br />- offline reading practically impossible<br />- long-term availability/archivability uncertain<br />- do patrons see DRM e-books as equivalent to print?<br />Growing tensions in academic book publishing<br />potential of e-publishing underused<br />academics writing for academics (cf. serials crisis)<br />balance between stakeholder interests needed<br />moving wall open access for ‘no longer current’ books<br />PDA without DRM (Elsevier’s EBS).<br />
  7. 7. September 22, 2011<br />Summary<br />(low) circulation is not a strong argument for PDA<br />(high) selection cost/time ís<br />PDA can be suitable for (a significant) part of our patrons’ book needs<br />PDA is not likely to be cheaper<br />the DRM entailed by current PDA practice is in the way of optimal use & usability<br />putting your stakes on PDA-with-DRM ignores the growing tensions in academic book publishing.<br />
  8. 8. mm-dd-yy<br /> | 8<br />Thank you<br />p.j.b.m.van.laarhoven@rug.nl<br />

×