19. "B" DRIVE
"B"
DRIVE
"C"DRIVE
"I" Drive
"J" Drive
"NN"
W
ay
"M
M
"
W
ay
40' x 62' TYP. LOTS
Alley
"B" DRIVE
"D"DRIVE
"B" DRIVE
"D"DRIVE
Scale : 1" = 250'
Design By: Taylor Wilson, EIT
Edited By: Lidiya Sypyuk, EIT
Date: 11/30/2016
SCALE
VARIES
Client : MTC Properties
Project : Site Development for Dental Office Space
Title : Cover Page
Scale : 1" = 150'
Scale : 1" = 2 Miles
IN-SITE
ENGINEERING
6000 J Street
Sacramento 95819
20. NO SCALE
Client : MTC Properties
Project : Site Development for Dental Office Space
Title : Legend
IN-SITE
ENGINEERING
6000 J Street
Sacramneto CA, 95819
Design By: Taylor Wilson, EIT
Edited By: Lidiya Sypyuk, EIT
Date: 11/14/2016
21. Scale:
1" = 40'
Client : MTC Properties
Project : Site Development for Dental Office Space
Title : Site Layout
IN-SITE
ENGINEERING
6000 J Street
Sacramneto CA, 95819
Design By: Taylor Wilson, EIT
Edited By: Lidiya Sypyuk, EIT
Date: 11/14/2016
22. Edited By: Lidiya Sypyuk, EIT
Date: 11/30/2016
NO
SCALE
Client : MTC Properties
Project : Site Development for Dental Office Space
Title :Site Layout Details
IN-SITE
ENGINEERING
6000 J Street
Sacramento 95819
23.
24. Scale:
1" = 50'
Client : MTC Properties
Project : Site Development for Dental Office Space
Title : Drainage Plan
IN-SITE
ENGINEERING
6000 J Street
Sacramneto CA, 95819
Design By: Taylor Wilson, EIT
Edited By: Lidiya Sypyuk, EIT
Date: 11/14/2016
25. Design By: Taylor Wilson, EIT
Edited By: Lidiya Sypyuk, EIT
Date: 11/14/2016
NO
SCALE
Client : MTC Properties
Project : Site Development for Dental Office Space
Title : Drainage and Grading Details
IN-SITE
ENGINEERING
6000 J Street
Sacramneto CA, 95819
26. Design By: Lidiya Sypyuk, EIT
Edited By: Taylor Wilson, EIT
Date: 11/14/2016
Scale:
1" = 40'
Client : MTC Properties
Project : Site Development for Dental Office Space
Title : Grading Plan
IN-SITE
ENGINEERING
6000 J Street
Sacramento, CA 95819
27.
28. APPENDIX B-1
Drainage Calculations: Dry Well #1
Calculations prepared by Hydrologist: Manvir Chahal
Reviewed by Quality Manager: Austin de los Reyes
Approved by Project Manager: Taylor Wilson
Find the appropriate size for a dry well receiving runoff from Shed Area 1.
Given:
Ku = 0.933
n = 0.013
L = 154 ft
S = 1.03%
c = 0.20
1) Calculate time of concentration
Tc =
Iterative process using IDF curve formula:
Try Tc = 25 min
i = 1.00 in/hr
Try Tc = 22 min
i = 1.074 in/hr
Try Tc = 21.6 min
i = 1.084 in/hr
***Use 21.52 min and i value of 1.084 in/hr
2) Calculate Flowrate
3) Calculate 15 min volume
29. 4) Calculate dry well dimensions
Height = 5 ft
Width = 5 ft
Length = 5 ft
30. Appendix B-1 Continued
Drainage Calculations: Infiltration Swale #1
Calculations prepared by Hydrologist: Manvir Chahal
Reviewed by Quality Manager: Austin de los Reyes
Approved by Project Manager: Taylor Wilson
a) Design gutters for Tributary Area 1
b) Find the bioswale dimensions to treat Shed Area 3
Step 1 Calculate Tributary Area 1 flowrate
Given:
Sheet flow
Gutter flow
Capacity:
Open Channel:
a) Gutter Flow
Capacity
Velocity
Trapezoidal Try:
31. Time of concentration – PIPE
Time of Concentration – Tributary Area 1
Sheet Flow Iterative process using IDF Curve
formula:
Try:
Try:
Try:
Step 2 Calculate Flowrate
,
b) Tributary Area 2
Step1
Time of Concentration – Tributary Area 2
Sheet Flow Iterative process using IDF Curve
formula:
Try:
Try:
Try:
32. Step 2 Calculate Flowrate
Tributary Area 3
Step 3
Time of Concentration – Tributary Area 3
Sheet Flow Iterative process using IDF Curve
formula:
Try:
Try:
Try:
Step 4 Calculate Flowrate
Step 5 Flowrate Total
33. Step 6
Biofiltration Dimensions for
From Chart:
**Bioswale Cross Section, Refer to Sheet XX for
diagram
General Dimensions
Step 7 Required Length of Bioswale
48. Appendix B-9
Pavement Design Calculations
Calculations prepared by Transportation Engineer: Jasmeen Chahal
Reviewed by Quality Manager: Austin de los Reyes
Approved by Project Manager: Taylor Wilson
Traffic Index (TI) = 7
Resistance Value (R) = 40
GE - Gravel Equivalent
HMA - Hot Mix Asphalt
Fs - Factor of Safety
AB - Aggregate Base
AS - Aggregate Subbase
Standard formula:
1) Determine total pavement structure GE using standard formula:
2) Determine GE of HMA surface layer using standard formula:
- According to HDM Table 663.3, Class 2 AB has a California R value of 78.
3) Add 0.2’ required safety factor to GEHMA:
Total
4) HDM Table 633.1 used to determine GE and thickness of HMA surface layer:
- Use GE for HMA layer of 0.75’ to get a HMA thickness of 0.35’.
5) Determine GE of combined HMA and AB layers using standard formula:
- Using Table 663.3, the R value for Class 2 AS is 50.
49. 6) Add 0.2’ required safety factor to GEHMA+AB :
Total
7) Subtract GEHMA+AB and GEHMA to find GEAB :
GEAB = GEHMA+AB - GEHMA
GEAB = 1.32’ – 0.693’ = 0.627’
- Table 633.1 shows a value of 0.66’ to be the closest value to the calculated GE of
0.63’ for the AB layer. Therefore, using a GE Base value of 0.66’ gives an AB
thickness of 0.60’.
8) Thickness of GEAS :
GETot = GEHMA + GEAB + GEAS
1.344’ = 0.693’ + 0.627’ + GEAS
GEAS = 0.024’
- Gravel factor based on Table 663.3 for Class 2 AS is 1.0
- Table 633.1 shows a minimum value of 0.35’ to be the closest value to the calculated
GE subbase value of 0.024’.
- Since the subbase value is very small, it is determined that an aggregate subbase is
not needed for this pavement design. To account for this small amount, the AB
thickness will be increased to 0.65’.
The final pavement structural layer thicknesses for the above calculations are as
follows:
Layer Thickness (ft)
HMA 0.35
AB 0.65
