complete report in panama leak in pakistan

1. Panama Leaks
1
Summary
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) makes 11.5 million secret documents available
to the public for the very first time. The documents, coming from Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca,
contain confidential attorney-client information for more than 214,488 offshore entities. Eight off-shore
companies were reported to have links with the family of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his brother, Chief
Minister of Punjab, Shahbaz Sharif.
According to documents available on the ICIJ website, the prime minister's children Maryam, Hassan and
Hussain “were owners or had the right to authorise transactions for several companies”.
The leaks breathe a new life into allegations of corruption that the Sharif family has long been haunted by.
At the forefront of the battle is Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf, lead by its chairman ImranKhan.

2. Panama Leaks
2
Introduction
Mossack Fonseca is the world’s fourth biggest provider of offshore services. It has acted for more than
300,000 companies. There is a strong UK connection. More than half of the companies are registered in
British-administered tax havens, as well as in the UK itself.
The Panama Papers are an unprecedented leak of 11.5m files from the database of the world’s fourth biggest
offshore law firm, Mossack Fonseca. The records were obtained from an anonymous source by the German
newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung, which shared them with the International Consortium of Investigative
Journalists (ICIJ). The ICIJ then shared them with a large network of international partners, including the
Guardian and the BBC.
It is a Panama-based law firm whose services include incorporating companies in offshore jurisdictions such
as the British Virgin Islands. It administers offshore firms for a yearly fee. Other services include wealth
management.
The firm is Panamanian but runs a worldwide operation. Itswebsite boasts of a global network with 600
people working in 42 countries. It has franchises around the world, where separately owned affiliates sign up
new customers and have exclusive rights to use its brand. Mossack Fonseca operates in taxhavens including
Switzerland, Cyprus and the British Virgin Islands, and in the British crown dependencies Guernsey, Jersey
and the Isle of Man.

3. Panama Leaks
3
Complete Case
April 4, 2016
PTI Chairman Imran Khan and his party aides consolidate their position on corruption allegations against the
prime minister, demanding immediate action by the government to respond to the allegations.
This marks the beginning of what will be nearly a year long effort to resolve the Panama Papers case, also
dubbed 'Panamgate'in the local media.
Later that afternoon, Maryam Nawaz tweets what appears to be a statement from the Sharif family
spokesman. They arecalling the revelations made under the Panama Papers leaks, a "distortion of
information".
The statement goes on to clarify that "Maryam Nawaz is not a beneficiary or owner of any of the companies"
named in the leaked documents.
View image on TwitterView image on Twitter
April 5, 2016
Under-pressure Sharif announces probe
Realising that silence may deepen the crisis, Sharif takes to the Pakistan Television (PTV) headquarters to
address the nation and clear the air. The prime minister begins his speech with a subtle acknowledgment of
the fact that he is using state apparatus to address a personal matter.
Visibly perturbed, Sharif says he is open to the formation of a judicial commission to probe his family's
alleged finances in offshore tax-havens.
He explains how his family business was ruined by the party of the Bhuttos from the 70s to the 90 and then
was slowly built up again. "On Jan 2, 1972, Bhutto took over the foundry in Lahore, and hence our assets
were lost in mere moments," Mr Sharif confesses.
"My family was not involved in politics till much later, as such, even before I got into politics, we were an
established industrial family," he explained.
The prime minister goes on to speak about how his father established an industrial plant in Makkah,
following the military coup in 1999. The plant, he says, was "later sold, and my sons invested the funds into
their businesses."
Denying the legitimacy of allegations targeting his family and himself, the prime minister assures the country
he is open to legal scrutiny.

4. Panama Leaks
4
April 10, 2016
Khan wants CJP to head commission
Khan wants the government to promptly form an inquiry commission led by the serving Chief Justice of
Pakistan, Anwar ZaheerJamali. To the contrary, the government is keen on having ex-Supreme Court judges
populate the bench.
April 13, 2016
Five ex-SC judges refuse to lead inquiry
Still in its infancy, 'panamagate'begins to ingress into the judicial sphere, albeit turbulently. Interior Minister
Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan reveals that the ex-Supreme Court judges contacted by the government to head the
inquiry commission have turned down the offer.
Nisar regrets: “All of these judges after taking the time to think over the matter refused to lead the
commission without giving any reasons."
April 14, 2016
Frail, Sharif in London for check-up
Despite mounting criticism from local press and political parties, Sharif takes off for London citing a medical
check up as the reason for this five-day tour.
A PML-N source reveals: “The prime minister was looking quite weak when he visited the Planning and
Development Ministry a few days ago and the disclosures of his sons’ involvement in offshore business
definitely had its political and health costs.”
The office bearer adds that apparently due to a mistake by surgeons during a previous medical procedure in
London, Mr Sharif had bled profusely. He recovered, but not completely, and was advised to take breaks
from his engagements for further treatment.
April 16, 2016
A government team headed by Finance Minister Ishaq Dar finalises the terms of reference (ToRs) for the
proposed inquiry commission being formed to investigate the Panama Papers leaks.
The ToRs are meant to define a scope within which the investigation would take place. Understandably, this
is going to be a matter of contention.
Mainly the government's ToRs looked at empowering the proposed judicial commission to look into the
following points:
To examine information relating to involvement of Pakistani citizens, persons of Pakistan origin and legal
entities in off-shore companies in Panama or in any other country.Involvement of former and present holders

5. Panama Leaks
5
of public office in writing off their own bank loans or those of their immediate family members through
political influence.
Transfer from Pakistan of funds which have originated from corruption, commissions or kickbacks, and to
determine whether, in any case referred to above, any law for the time being in force in Pakistan has been
infringed.
Maryam Nawaz expresses annoyance on PML-N's response not being "robust" enough. The meeting also
reportedly resolved that: “If at all the commission is formed it will be the one headed by a retired judge of
the Supreme Court as announced by the prime minister in his address to the nation.”
Despite having been rejected by five ex-SC judges, the Muslim League leadership is still adamant to see a
retired judge of the Supreme Court heading the commission. Rumour has it; retired judge Sarmad Jalal
Osmany has accepted the responsibility to lead the probe.
The opposition parties, however, are still unclear on how best to go about the probe.
April 19, 2016
Sharif returns to Pakistan
Amidst political turbulence, Sharif returns to Pakistan, eyeing a difficult job ahead of him.
April 22, 2016
'Will resign if proven guilty,' Sharif in second stateaddress
In yet another address to the nation, Sharif announces that his government has decided to formally ask then
Chief Justice of Pakistan to set up a judicial commission for investigations into Panama Papers leak.
"I challenge all those who allege tax fraud to come forward and present evidence. If charges are proved
against me, I will resign immediately," vowed Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.
Sharif appears visibly piqued and spares no one while targeting his political opponents; the ‘hostile’ media,
the regime of Gen Pervez Musharraf and his allies. Hereserves the bulk of his criticism for Imran Khan.
April 25, 2016
Opposition rejects govt ToRs
Rejecting the inquiry commission proposed by the government, leaders from the PTI, PPP, MQM, PML-Q
demand the ToRs of any such commission be drafted in consultation with the opposition.
May 1, 2016
Bilawal asks Sharif to step down

6. Panama Leaks
6
Coming out strongly against the government, PPP chairperson Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari calls on Prime Minister
Nawaz Sharif to step down, until an inquiry into the money laundering allegations levelled at his family are
completed.
“As long as the investigations into the Panama leaks areongoing, you should resign. You can resume [office]
when you are absolved of the charges,” he said, reminding Mr Sharif of advice he had imparted for the
former prime minister Yousuf Raza Gilani when the latter was facing multiple charges in court.
May 3, 2016
Opposition presents ToRs
After a joint meeting between opposition parties, a set of ToRs have been presented to the government and
the media. The ToRs emphasise on initiating the inquiry into off-shore holdings, starting with the Sharif
family.
Among other points, the ToRs enlist the following:
Whether a respondent, by concealing the ownership and source of income through which the properties
were purchased has committed corrupt and illegal practices under the elections/tax laws.
A special law titled “Panama Papers (inquiry and Trial) Act 2016” should be passed to facilitate the
investigation into the assets, both foreign and domestic, of the prime minister. The law shall be formed with
the consensus of the opposition parties.
A special commission should be formed, headed by Chief Justice and comprising two other SC judges
nominated by him.
The procedure of the inquiry shall be fully inquisitorial in character The commission should complete its
inquiry in relation to the prime minister and his family in three months.
May 5, 2016
Govt rejects opposition's ToRs
Rejecting the opposition’s draft of the ToRs for a judicial probe, the government indicated it was willing to sit
with the opposition and to come up with ToRs that were focused on eliminating corruption and did not target
the prime minister personally.
“The opposition wants the prime minister in the dock, without touching other politicians whose children also
run offshore companies,” said Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, alleging that the opposition was not serious about
holding an inquiry and only wanted to achieve their political goals by simply levelling allegations.
May 10, 2016
Raheel Sharif urges PM to resolve the Panama issue

7. Panama Leaks
7
Gen Sharif, according to a well-placed government source, conveyed a pointed message to the prime
minister in a one-on-one meeting.
The army chief’s view was that the protracted controversy over Panama Papers investigation was affecting
governance and national security and, therefore, the issue needed to be urgently brought to a close.
May 13, 2016
Supreme Court rejects inquiry commission
The Panamagatecontroversy takes a new turn as the Supreme Court returns the federal government’s
request to appoint an inquiry commission to investigate the leaked document's connection with the Sharif
family.
“Formation of commission of inquiry under the Pakistan Commission of Inquiry Act 1956 (Act VI of 1956),
looking to its limited scope, will result in the constitution of a toothless commission, which will serve no
useful purpose, except giving bad name to it,” says a communication sent to the law secretary by Supreme
Court registrarArbab Mohammad Arif.
The letter also observes that the ToRs of the proposed commission are so “wide and open” that “it may take
years” for the commission to conclude proceedings.
May 16, 2016
Sharif explains himself in landmark speech
The prime minister suggests the formation of a joint committee to draft the ToRs, which will establish the
judicial commission he referred to in his first state address on the Panama Papers allegations.
In this speech, Sharif attempts to explain the ownership of his London Park Lane flats. Astonishingly, there is
no mention of Qatari Prince Jassim.
The money used to purchase flats in London, he says, was linked to properties the Sharif family sold off in
Pakistan decades ago.
'Prime minister lied on the floor,' Shah accuses Sharif
After the session, PTI says Sharif has mislead the assembly. “The prime minister lied on the floor of the
house,” says PTI leader Shah Mahmood Qureshi.
“We have rejected the prime minister’s speech and the chief justice has already rejected the ToRs prepared
by the government. So we will see where do we go from here,” he adds.
May 18, 2016
Consensus to form ToR committee
After much back and forth, the federal government and opposition have agreed to form a 12-member
committee in order to draft joint ToRs for an inquiry commission, which would probe the Panama Papers.

8. Panama Leaks
8
After a meeting with opposition members, information minister Pervaiz Rasheed said that government and
opposition will name six legislators each to form the parliamentary committee.
May 22, 2016
Nawaz flies to London for heart surgery
Maryam Nawaz says cardiologists and surgeons carried out tests, following which they decided to go for an
open heart surgery. The surgery will be performed on May 31, and opposition party leaders – including Imran
Khan and Bilawal Bhutto – tweet their best wishes to Sharif. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi also
tweets good luck to Sharif.
Maryam dubs the surgery successful and thanks everyone for their prayers and good wishes.
June 4, 2016
The ToR stalemate
The 12-member bipartisan parliamentary committee seems to have hit a dead end as both sides are not only
refusing to budge from their positions on the issue of offshore companies but are also accusing each other of
toughening their stance.
The opposition insists on starting the Panamagateprobe from Sharif and his three children, whereas the
government side wants to enact a law that would extend the scope of investigations but would not make any
reference to the premier.
Opposition parties later in the month say they will take to the streets if the government doesn’t review its
position on the ToRs.
June 24, 2016
PTI files petition with ECP against Sharif
PTI files a reference with the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) seeking disqualification of Sharif for
allegedly concealing his assets.
Three days later, PPP also petitions the ECP to disqualify the prime minister and his family members. “The
prime minister is not sadiq and ameen anymore and, therefore, is not eligible to hold a seat in the National
Assembly,” says the petition, which also contains charges of money laundering, taxevasion and concealment
of assets.
July 9, 2016
48 days later, Nawaz returns to Pakistan
Sharif returns home from London, kicking off discussions among analysts about what he should now do to
secure his future as the chief executive of the country.

9. Panama Leaks
9
Upon his arrival in Lahore, the prime minister appears relaxed and lighter in weight than when he had left a
month and a half ago.
The prime minister’s arrival also fuels discussions such as the one during which Mr Sharif had repeatedly
been told about the need for having some formal deputies in place, minding the party and the government
on his behalf, should the need arise.
July 12, 2016
PM advised to get tough with PTI
As he returns to work and is updated on the economic, security and political situation, Sharif is also
determined to devise a plan to counter the PTI chief’s ‘propaganda’.
Khan had recently declared that he was now ready “to play the final round of matches” against the ruling
party.
At the meetings in Raiwind, the prime minister is quoted as asking his advisers to prepare the ground for
“multiple strategies” against opposition parties.
A PML-N politician from Lahore remarks that “the prime minister’s body language is that of a leader
determined to stand firm against his opponents. He is in no mood to show leniency,” he says.
July 20, 2016
'No more negotiations,' says opposition
The opposition has decided not to negotiate anymore with the government over the ToR issue.
PTI had invited opposition parties to plot their future course of action after the government refused to accept
their ToRs for a Panama specific probe.
Rather than adopting a hard-hitting stance against the government, opposition parties agreedto use their
presence in the national and provincial assemblies to remind Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif of his promise to
hold a free and fair investigation into the Panamagatescandal.
August 3, 2016
Mr Khan regrets that four months had passed since the Panamagatemade headlines, but not a single
institution had moved or served notice on those whose names had appeared in the Panama Papers for
allegedly committing money laundering and taxevasion.
In the run-up to the ‘movement for accountability’, PTI starts building pressure on the state institutions he
believes areresponsible for election rigging and rampant corruption in the country.
August 24, 2016
JI files 'frivolous' Panama petition in SC

10. Panama Leaks
10
Jamaat-i-Islami (JI) Emir Sirajul Haq filed his party’s long-awaited petition on the Panama Papers leaks in the
Supreme Court.
The petition doesn’t name Nawaz Sharif directly. PTI is expected to file a similar petition next week.
Four days later, the apex court returns the petition, terming it ‘frivolous’.
“This petition prima facie appears to be a frivolous petition within the contemplation of Order XVII Rule 5 of
the Supreme Court Rules 1980,” says an order issued by the registrar office.
August 29, 2016
Seeking PM’s disqualification, PTI files petition with SC
The PTI files a petition with the Supreme Court seeking disqualification of prime minister Sharif from his
office as well as the National Assembly.
The petition was filed by PTI’s counsel Naeem Bukhari on behalf of party chairman Imran Khan. It has been
filed against 10 respondents, which include Nawaz Sharif, his daughter, sons and government institutions.
Bukhari told reporters that their petition is based on the prime minister’s May 16 speech delivered on the
floor of the National Assembly.
"A statement delivered on the floor of an assembly possesses prestige," he said, adding that were a lot of
contradictions between the facts and the claims made by Nawaz.
September 25, 2016
Imran urges followers to put up 'country's biggest ever demonstration'
Khan appeals to people to fully participate in his party’s September 30 march to Raiwind in order to put
pressure on state institutions which, according to him, are not working judiciously on the Panama Papers
issue.
September 30, 2016
PTI protests outside Sharif residence, demands Nawaz's resignation
Doubling the political pressure on Nawaz Sharif, the PTI leadership decides to invite its workers to stage a sit-
in outside the residence of Nawaz Sharif.
On their call, several thousand supporters of the PTI from different parts of the country reach Raiwind Road
to participate in the “accountability movement” seen by many as a “do-or-die” act of Imran Khan.
October 7, 2016
Khan’s next plan: Islamabad lockdown

11. Panama Leaks
11
PTI chairman Imran Khan calls on party workers to lay siege to Islamabad on Oct 30, telling them to paralyse
the capital until Sharif resigns or presents himself for accountability.
October 10, 2016
Imran asks court for early hearing
In a bid to increase pressure on the government, the PTI has asked the Supreme Court to hold an early
hearing of its petition seeking to disqualify Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, his son-in-law retired Capt
Mohammad Safdar and Finance Minister Ishaq Darfor their alleged involvement in the Panamagatescandal.
October 20, 2016
SC accepts petitions
The Supreme Court of Pakistan started accepting petitions filed by Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaaf, Jamhoori Watan
Party, Jamaat-i-Islami and others to begin the proceedings. "I welcome the judicial proceedings in connection
with Panama Papers," said Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in reply.
In a statement issued after consultation with his legal team, he said, "The court of public opinion has been
making decisions, it would be better to wait for the judiciary's decision."
October 28, 2016
SC forms a larger bench to formally initiate proceedings
The SC has formed a larger five-bench to hear petitions regarding Panama. Earlier, a three member bench
accepted petitions filed by PTI and Sheikh Rashid, asking for the Prime Minister's disqualification.
October 31, 2016
Imran's lockdown threat inches closer to reality
Khan calls on supporters to gather in capital, but the numbers aren’t impressive. The government places
shipping containers to block off routes from Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa into Islamabad.
Khan rails against Sharif; government stands its ground.
November 1, 2016
First hearing: SC asks for ToRs, PTI calls off lockdown.It was win-win for all sides when the SC asked the
government and the protesting PTI to present their respective ToRs, in case the court decided to constitute
an inquiry commission on Panamagate.
The order allowed Imran Khan to save face and call off his plan to lock down the capital, while Prime Minister
Nawaz Sharif accepted the formation of a judicial commission to investigate the Panama Papers scam, which
has been a bone of contention between the two parties since the scandal broke in April 2016.

12. Panama Leaks
12
The apex court had, on May 13, declined to accept the federal government’s plea to appoint a commission of
inquiry to probe the Panamagatescandal.
November 2, 2016
PTI holds 'thanksgiving' rally
November 7, 2016
Sharif children submit replies to SC
The Sharif children's counsel, Salman Aslam Butt, informed the bench that Hassan Nawaz has been running a
business lawfully for the last 22 years and Hussain for 16 years.
He added that Maryam Nawaz is not dependent on the prime minister.
Denying allegations levelled in the petitions, Maryam said she is not the beneficiary owner of off shore
companies, Nielsen and Nescoll, but only a trustee.
November 14, 2016
'Good for selling Pakoras': PTI submits evidence
The PTI and the AML chief are two of the four parties who have submitted their documents. Analysing the
evidence will be a five-judge Supreme Court bench, headed by Chief Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali.
The court is currently considering whether or not to appoint a judicial commission to probe the Panamagate
scandal.
The big question: how did Nawaz Sharif's children pay for their London properties?
The Supr-eme Court questioned the quality of the evidence presented by PTI and deplored that their 680-
page submission had almost nothing to do with the Sharif family’s London properties.
Pointing at PTI’s counsel Hamid Khan, Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed observed that it seemed as if the
petitioners were trying to bury the truth under their evidence that consisted mostly of newspaper clippings,
which were only good for selling pakoras the day after publication.
Also read: #Panamagate
Prince Jassim of Qatar presents a different story
Like a rabbit out of a hat, PML-N counsel Mohammad Akram Sheikh pulls out a document dated Nov 5, 2016
— marked private, confidential and not to be disclosed to any party, except for the benefit of the courts of
Pakistan — on the letterhead of Hamad Bin Jassim Bin Jaber Al Thani, who ruled Qatar from 2007 to 2013.
The letter states that Hamad’s father — Jassim bin Jabr Al Thani — had “longstanding business relations with
Mian Mohammad Sharif” — Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s father — “which were coordinated through my

13. Panama Leaks
13
eldest brother”. In the year 1980, “Mian Sharif expressed his desire to invest a certain amount of money in
the real estate business of Al Thani family in Qatar,” the document says.
The Supreme Court is not pleased to hear yet another explanation for how the Sharif family paid for its
London properties, observing that both sides were doing their best to ensure that the court would eventually
have to form a commission to decide the Panamagatecase.
“This document has completely changed the public stand of the prime minister,” Justice Asif Saeed Khosa
observed after the Sharif children’s newly-engaged counsel, Mohammad Akram Sheikh, presented before the
court an attestedletter from a former Qatari prime minister.
November 30, 2016
'Shahbaz forged signatures'
PTI's lead counsel in the Panamagatecase Naeem Bukhari, before the Supreme Court, alleged that Punjab
Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif had forged his cousin Tariq Shafi's signatures on documents.
Addressing a five-judge bench, Bukhari said, "I dont want to say that Shahbaz Sharif forged Tariq Shafi's
signature but there is a difference in the signatures on the affidavit and the contract."
During the hearing, the judges also discussed the evidence presented by Bukhari gatheredfrom news
sources.
The court observed, "If we make a judgement on the basis of news sources, then the PTI should also be
worried."
December 9, 2016
CJ Jamali's retirement halts proceedings
Procee-dings in the case have ended today as Chief Justice Zaheer Jamali is scheduled to retire. The Supreme
Court said that arguments from both sides would commence afresh when hearings resume in January.
A five-judge larger bench headed by Justice Asif Saeed Khosa has been constituted by the Supreme Court to
resume hearing of the Pana-ma Papers case from January 4, 2017.
December 31, 2016
Flipping through lawyers; PM's children change counsel again
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his children submitted documents in the Supreme Court notifying a change
of counsel in the Panamagatecase.
According to the documents, Advocate Makhdoom Ali Khan will now represent Nawaz Sharif in court instead
of Salman Aslam Butt.

14. Panama Leaks
14
Hassan and Hussain Nawaz will be represented by Salman Akram Raja, while Maryam Nawaz will be
represented by Shahid Hamid.
January 4, 2017
New bench resumes hearing
The hearing of the Panamagatecase resumed on Thursday where the five member bench, headed by Justice
Asif Saeed Khosa, was appraised about details of the offices held by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif during his
political career.
Naeem Bukhari, who represents PTI’s chief Imran Khan sought court’s permission to refer to a number of
interviews of the Prime Minister, his spouse and children at different point of time to highlight that every one
of them took a divergent stand about the ownership of the London properties.
Bukhari cited an April 10, 2000, interview of Begum Kalsoom Nawaz by Rory McCarthy of The Guardian in
which she conceded that London flats were bought because her son was studying.
At this, Justice Saeed again cautioned the counsel that he was entering into a dangerous territory, adding
that if "we start hanging people on television interviews or news paper clippings then your client will not
survive either."
January 6, 2017
Burden of proof becomes a sticking point
Members of the Supreme Court bench hearing the Panamagatecase expressed divergent opinions over
which side shouldered the burden of proof.
While Justice Asif Saeed Khosa — who heads the five-judge bench — placed the burden of proof on Prime
Minister Nawaz Sharif’s family, Justice Azmat and Justice Ejaz, differed.
January 12, 2017
'Two different money trails' puzzle the bench
The prime minister's counsel is quizzed about a money trail for the London flats and is asked to prove there
were no inconsistencies in the prime minister's speech in the National Assembly last year.
"There are two different money trails before us. How did the money go from Jeddah and then to London?
And how did the money go from Dubai to London and then Qatar?" the judge asked.
January 13, 2017
Sharif family's flats purchased in 1990s, BBC report reveals
Properties owned by the Sharif family in London’s upscale Park Lane neighbourhood were purchased in the
1990s and there has been no change of ownership since then, BBC Urdu has reported.

15. Panama Leaks
15
According to official documents available with BBC Urdu, the four flats were purchased in the name of the
Nielsen and Nescoll companies.
According to the documents, an official record of companies doing business in the United Kingdom reveals
that when Hassan Nawaz established Flagship Investment Ltd in 2001, the address he provided at the time of
registration of the company was that of his Park Lane apartment.
Hussain had said: "The Park Lane apartments in London are ours, two offshore companies, Nielsen and
Nescoll, own these flats and I am the beneficial owner of these companies, working under a trust held by my
sister Maryam Nawaz Sharif."
January 17, 2017
Maryam submits reply
The prime minister's daughter Maryam Nawaz Sharif submitted her reply to the court.
In her reply, she maintained that she was not her father's dependent after her marriagein 1992 to Captain
Safdar, and that she lived with her husband after her wedding.
January 23, 2017
German daily tweets trouble for Maryam
German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung on Monday tweeted documents to 'help' Pakistanis form their own
opinion on the role of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's daughter in Panamagate.
“For those in Pakistan who doubt the role of the prime minister’s daughter MariamSafdar in Panama Papers
– some of the documents. Judge yourself,” Süddeutsche Zeitung tweeted, along with attachments purporting
to show her involvement with Minerva Financial Services. Maryam Safdar is her legal name after marriage.
January 26, 2017
Second letter from Qatari royal
A second letter is floated by Hussain Nawaz's counsel, 'clarifying' Sharif’s investment in Gulf Steel Mills. The
letter is accompanied by transaction details and auditor's reports regarding the Gulf Steel Mills in Dubai and
the Azizia Steel Mills in Jeddah.
"The investment was made by way of provision of cash which was common practice in the Gulf region at the
time of the investment. It was also, given the longstanding relationship between my father and Mr Sharif, a
customary way for them to do business between themselves," the letter states.
"At the end of 2005, after receiving all accruals and other distributions made over the term of the
investment, it was agreed that an amount of approx $8,000,000 was due to Mr Sharif. The amount due to
him was settled in 2006," the letter explains, "by way of the delivery to Mr Hussain Nawaz Sharif's
representative of bearer shares of Nescoll Ltd and Nielsen Enterprises Ltd, which had been kept during that
time in Qatar."

16. Panama Leaks
16
January 27, 2017
SC orders NAB to submit Hudaibiya reference record on Dar's 'confession'
As part of the Panamagatecase hearing, Finance Minister Ishaq Dar's lawyer Shahid Hamid addressed
allegations against his client pertaining to the Hudaibiya Paper Mills default reference investigated by NAB.
Hamid read from Dar's confessional statement in court: "After the military coup, I was first kept under house
arrest then was offered a position in that government in exchange for cooperation. I was made to sign a pre-
written statement and then was arrested again."
"The army kept me captive till 2001, after which I told Rauf Klasra everything in a detailed interview and
denied the statement that I was made to sign at the time," he finished.
January 31, 2017
Supreme Court concerned over NAB, Qatari letters
As the Pamanagatecase hearing resumed, NAB Prosecutor General Waqas Qadeer Darwas called once again
to the stand and questioned why the ruling in the Hudaibiya Paper Mills case was not appealed.
During the hearing, the five-judge bench also questioned the absence of any mention of the Qatari
investments in Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's speech in the National Assembly and in Tariq Shafi's affidavit
presented to the apex court.
"We were told that all evidence had been made available, and that perhaps it was we who were unable to
see it in its entirety," Justice Asif Saeed Khosa said in stern admonishment to Akram.
February 15, 2017
The Panama 'onion': PTI presents 'new evidence'
The bench had postponed day-to-day proceedings after Justice Saeed had to be rushed to the Rawalpindi
Institute of Cardiology following chest pains on Jan 31.
“We are submitting three more documents — one from PTI chairman Imran Khan that authenticates all
previous documents presented by the party, the expert opinion of UK-based lawyers and a document that
proves that Maryam Nawaz is the owner of UK-based firms Minerva, Nielson and Nescoll,” PTI spokesman
Fawad Chaudhry told a press conference.
“Where is the actualdocument to show that Hussain Nawaz, the elder son of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, is
the owner of the four London flats?” asked Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed, a member of the five-judge Supreme
Court bench who rejoined proceedings after recovering from a cardiac ailment.
The prime minister's counsel argued that the petitioners had failed to link Nawaz Sharif to any wrongdoing,
nor found any culpability.

17. Panama Leaks
17
They positioned themselves arguing that since no serious chargehas yet been established against the prime
minister except general allegations, there is no possibility of holding his children accountable for the
allegations levelled by petitioners.
Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan regrettedthat the court was getting bogged down, describing the case as an onion,
that yielded a new surprise every day.
“Every day, new documents and new queries are coming up. How shall we sum it all up?” the judge observed.
February 16, 2017
Surprise: Maryam trustee of London flats for six months, admits Maryam's lawyer
The lawyer for Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s sons sprang a new surprise before the Supreme Court by
claiming that the bearer share certificates of the four London flats remained in the custody of Maryam Nawaz
— the prime minister’s daughter — between February and July 2006.
Salman Akram Raja told the court that a trust deed was executed between Maryam and Hussain Nawaz in
February 2006, following which she acted as a trustee for her brother.
The confession could prove to be a major blow to the Sharif's case.
February 18, 2017
Consider Qatari letters void: Imran asks SC
Imran Khan has submitted an affidavit to the SC, asking it to ignore the two Qatari letters produced by the
Sharif family as evidence of their stance in the case.
In the 24-page affidavit, the PTI leader termed the letters a wonderful example of reverse reconstruction,
clearly concocted to cater to the issues before the apex court. The letters, he argued, were simply
‘unbelievable’ and an alleged puerile attempt by a rich Qatari to come to the aid of a rich Pakistani.
February 20, 2017
Record of Hudaibiya, Raiwind references submitted to SC
Today, NAB furnished the Supreme Court with records of two corruption references filed against Prime
Minister Nawaz Sharif and other members of his family over a decade ago.
One deals with the Hudaibiya Paper Mills scam, while the other related to the illegal construction of the
Sharif family’s Raiwind Estate.
February 22, 2017
'If a story has been made up, you should stick to it'
The Attorney General of Pakistan (AG) told the bench that the case record in the Hudaibiya reference had
been examined and that the company had obtained loans through foreign currency accounts.

18. Panama Leaks
18
At this, Justice Saeed expressed the bench's frustration by saying that the lawyers were issuing different
statements each time, which was confusing the bench.
"If a story has been made up, you should stick to it," he remarked.
"The court was told that investments had been made in the Qatari [royal family's] businesses. There was no
mention of foreign currency accounts in the repayment of loans."
Addressing the AG, Justice Saeed said: "You should argue as the attorney general. Don't become a party [to
the case]."
February 23, 2017
Panamagatehearings conclude; judgement awaited
After both the defence and prosecution completed their arguments, the SC said it would reserve its verdict
on the Panamagatecase and issue a detailed judgement.
"It seems 'justice' is whatever serves [each party's] interests," Justice Asif Saeed Khosa remarked as the
arguments wound up.
"If a judgement is not in someone's interest, they [will] say the judiciary is corrupt, or that maybe the judges
aren't fit to handle such cases," he commented, adding; "And if a judgement benefits their own stand [on the
issue], they will say there can be no better judge."
"We will decide this case only by the law; such that people will say, 20 years down the line, that this
judgement was made by the book," concluded Justice Asif Saeed Khosa.
April 20, 2017
Neither a clean chit, nor a conviction: Supreme Court issues split verdict on Panamagatecase, orders
formation of JIT
The SC's split 3-2 verdict on the Panamagatecase ordered, for the first time in Pakistan's political history, that
a sitting prime minister and his children face further investigation by a specially-constituted six-man joint
investigation team (JIT) comprising Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), MI (Military Intelligence), NAB, SECP and
SBP officials.
The JIT was to probe whether PM Nawaz and his family members had amassed wealth beyond their known
sources of income. As a result of the majority verdict, Nawaz Sharif remained the prime minister, but faced a
thorough investigation by the JIT on the issue of money trailin what may be a long-drawn process.
Justice Khosa, who was heading the bench, and Justice Gulzar Ahmed both issued dissenting opinions in the
548-page judgement authored by Justice Ejaz Afzal, with additional notes from Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed
and Justice Ijazul Ahsan.

19. Panama Leaks
19
Justice Khosa in his dissent declared that PM Nawaz should be disqualified for not being honest before the
nation, parliament and court, and called for directions to the ECP to immediately de-notify the prime
minister, an opinion echoed by Justice GulzarAhmed.
The JIT was to submit periodical reports to an SC bench every two weeks, and was to complete its
investigation and submit a final report before the special bench within 60 days.
The probe team was formed on May 5 after some back-and-forth on names of officials who were to be a part
of the team.
The JIT was led by FIA’s Additional Director General Wajid Zia, a grade 21 officer, and included the SBP's Amer
Aziz, SECP Executive DirectorBilal Rasool, NAB Director Irfan Naeem Mangi, ISI's Brig Muha-mmad Nauman
Saeed and MI's Brig Kamran Khurshid.
July 10, 2017
JIT submits report to Supreme Court
The JIT submitted a 275-page report on the Sharif family's wealth to the Supreme Court. The apex court said
it would resume hearing the Panamagatecase starting July 17.
The court passed four orders during the session:
The opening of a criminal case against SECP Chairman ZafarHijazi for alleged record tampering of the Sharif's
Chaudhry Sugar Mills records by the FIA
Submission of transcripts of all speeches made by Railways Minister Khawaja Saad Rafique, the PM’s Special
Assistant Asif Kirmani, and PML-N MNA TalalChaudhry over the past two months
Public naming of the person who leaked a photo of the PM's son, Hussain Nawaz, during a JIT appearance.
The court ordered a commission to be formed regarding the matter, as it does not fall within the SC's
jurisdiction
Issuance of contempt of court notices to the publisher, editor and reporter of English daily The News for
"distorting a court order"
July 17, 2017
Supreme Court resumes hearing Panamagatecase
As the Panamgatehearing resumed, Finance Minister Ishaq Darand the Sharif family's lawyers submitted
separate objections to the JIT report.
The PTI's lead counsel Naeem Bukhari presented his arguments before the court.
July 21, 2017
Supreme Court reserves judgement in Panamagatecase

20. Panama Leaks
20
The Supreme Court concludes the hearings in the Panamagatecase and reserves its judgement, but does not
announce a date for the verdict.
The court also opens Volume X of the joint investigation team's report, which was earlier marked
"confidential", a copy of the volume is provided to Nawaz Sharif's lawyer Khawaja Harris.
Volume X of the report, titled "Mutual LegalAssistance Requests ─ Ongoing", is related to JIT's international
correspondence and the documents obtained from foreign countries during the investigation.
The FIA takes SECP Chairman ZafarHijazi into custody in Islamabad after its investigation revealed he had
allegedly altered records related to the Sharif family's Chaudhry Sugar Mills
The SC had ordered Hijazi's arrest in light of the FIA and JIT's probe reports.
July 28, 2017
SC disqualifies Nawaz from holding public office
On July 28, the bench disqualified Nawaz Sharif from holding public office.
The court ordered the Election Commission of Pakistan to de-notify the prime minister from his National
Assembly seat to fulfill the technicalities of implementing the order.
The Supreme Court said the ECP should de-seat the PM for not disclosing his role in the Dubai-based Capital
FZE company in his nomination papers, saying that this meant he was not 'honest' and 'truthful'.
The decision brought to an unceremonious end Sharif's third term in power, roughly one year before
scheduled general elections which would have seen him become the first Pakistani prime minister to
complete a full five-year term.
Additional reporting by Nasir Iqbal, Irfan Raza, Tariq Naqash, Amir Wasim, Naveed Siddiqui and Haseeb
Bhatti.
Conclusion
The two judges who ruled against PM Nawaz Sharif had said he should be disqualified as he could not be
considered 'honest' and 'truthful' (ameen and sadiq), whereas the other three were in favour of forming a
joint investigation team(JIT) to definitively answer the question of whether the allegations against the prime
minister were true or not.