SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 53
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
1
NATURAL RESOURCES
Gloucester County’s environment includes
many natural resources, including woodlands,
rivers, creeks, and wetlands. These assets, along
with abundant farm land, have provided a
means of livelihood and a high quality of life for
county residents for more than 350 years.
Watermen benefit from the extensive shoreline
and proximity to the Chesapeake Bay, farmers
profit from plentiful good quality soils, and
everyone reaps the rewards of living in a place
of broad rivers, forests, rural landscapes and
waterfront vistas. Maintaining the resources
that support this traditional way of life is a
priority for Gloucester County and serves as a
guiding principle in its growth management
philosophy.
The effects of population growth and land
development impact the natural environment in
many ways. These include, but are not limited
to:
• loss of plant and wildlife habitat;
• contamination of groundwater;
• saltwater intrusion arising from increased
groundwater withdrawals;
• degradation of surface water quality;
• decrease in groundwater recharge and
availability;
• disruption of natural drainage systems;
• air pollution;
• increased solid wastes; and,
• loss of the County’s visual quality.
The impact of growth and development on the
quality of Gloucester’s environment is an issue
of public concern, but environmental
deterioration is not an inevitable consequence
of population growth. Patterns of development
that are detrimental to natural resources can be
identified and mitigated by encouraging growth
in appropriate areas and by ensuring that new
development is designed and constructed in an
environmentally sensitive manner. Areas of
Gloucester County that are more susceptible to
environmental degradation should be identified
and development directed away from them and
guided to areas of the County where
environmental impacts will be less severe. The
County’s “contained growth” philosophy,
together with countywide land use and zoning
ordinances, provide the framework to manage
the location and character of anticipated future
growth in an environmentally sensitive manner.
Legal Framework
Localities are required by state laws and
regulations to address environmental issues
through their comprehensive plans. The same
enabling legislation that allows and requires
localities to create comprehensive plans
specifies what information those plans should
contain. Specifically, localities should designate
areas for various uses such as agriculture,
mineral resources, and flood plains.1
In
addition, localities should designate areas in
order to implement ground water protection
measures and provide maps showing
agricultural and forest areas. To ensure that
comprehensive plans are based on sound data,
localities are required to study a variety of
conditions, including the use of land, the
preservation of agricultural and forestal land,
natural resources, ground and surface waters,
geologic and environmental factors, drainage,
1
Code of Virginia § 15.2-2223
2 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
and flood control. Beginning in 2013, localities
will also be required to include coastal resource
management guidance currently being
developed by the Virginia Institute of Marine
Science.2
The Commonwealth also requires localities to
address environmental issues via the
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act and its
associated regulations.3
The Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Act explicitly authorizes local
governments to protect the quality of state
waters through their police and zoning powers,
and requires them to incorporate the
protection of the quality of state waters into
their comprehensive plans, zoning ordinance,
and subdivision ordinances. The Chesapeake
Bay Preservation Act is enforced by the
Commonwealth through the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Area Designation and
Management Regulations, which specify the
steps local governments must take to be in
compliance. Localities are required to develop a
local program incorporating several elements,
including:
1. a map delineating Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Areas (CBPAs)
2. performance criteria applying to
developments within those CBPAs
3. a comprehensive plan that incorporates the
protection of CBPAs and of the quality of
state waters
4. a zoning ordinance and a subdivision
ordinance that incorporate measures to
protect the quality of state waters in CBPAs
and require compliance with state
regulations
5. an erosion and sediment control ordinance
or revision that requires compliance with
state regulations, and
2
Code of Virginia § 15.2-2223.2
3
Code of Virginia § 10.1-21
6. a plan of development process that
assures that development within CBPAs
will protect the quality of state waters
prior to the issuance of any building
permits
The regulations go into further detail for each
program element. Comprehensive plans are
required to incorporate data collection and
analysis, policy discussions, maps, and
measures to implement local and state water
quality goals. Specific topics mentioned in the
regulations for data collection and policy
discussions are the location and extent of
CBPAs, physical constraints to development,
fisheries and other aquatic resources, shoreline
and streambank erosion problems, land use,
existing and potential water pollution sources,
public and private waterfront access, the
mitigation of development impacts on water
quality, and the use of redevelopment to
improve water quality.
In response to concerns about water quality
and the health of the Commonwealth’s coastal
resources, the General Assembly passed
legislation in 2011 that established “living
shorelines” as the preferred alternative in
Virginia for shoreline management in terms of
erosion control and water quality protection.
This legislation required the Virginia Marine
Resources Commission (VMRC) to develop and
implement a general permit that “authorizes
and encourages the use of living shorelines as
the preferred alternative for stabilizing tidal
shorelines in the Commonwealth” and the
Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) to
develop comprehensive coastal resource
management guidance for local governments.4
Beginning in 2013, localities will be required to
include this guidance in their comprehensive
4
Code of Virginia § 28.2-104.1
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
3
plans and plan updates.5
Although VIMS has not
developed specific guidance for Gloucester
County, general guidance, tools, and best
management practices have been completed;
this information is included in a later section of
this chapter.
Existing Conditions and Trends
Location and Climate
Gloucester County occupies the southernmost
part of Virginia’s Middle Peninsula, bounded by
King and Queen, Middlesex, and Mathews
Counties, and by the York River, Piankatank
River, and the Chesapeake Bay. Gloucester
County encompasses a total land area of 225
square miles and is characterized primarily by
flat terrain with a few areas of steep slopes
(defined as over a 15 percent grade) in the
northern and western areas of the County.
Gloucester’s climate is influenced by its
proximity to the Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic
Ocean, generally resulting in mild winters and
warm, humid summers. National Weather
Service (NWS) monitoring stations are located
nearby in Mathews County and in the Town of
West Point in King William County. Data from
both stations indicates that the average annual
temperature in the Gloucester area is 57°F to
59°F. January is normally the coldest month,
while July is the hottest. The average annual
rainfall is about 45 inches and is well distributed
throughout the year.
According to the National Climatic Data Center
(NCDC), the most frequently reported weather
events in the County are thunderstorms, severe
lightning, high winds, and flash flooding. In
5
Code of Virginia § 15.2-2223.2
addition to summer thunderstorms, major
producers of rainfall in Gloucester include
northeasters and tropical storms. Hurricanes
occasionally bring heavy rain, high winds, and
tidal flooding. The most significant weather
events in recent years include Hurricane Isabel,
which struck on September 18, 2003 and an
April 2011 tornado. Flooding from the storm
surge of Hurricane Isabel caused extensive
property damage in the region and many trees
were uprooted. The April 2011 tornado
destroyed homes, cost lives, and rendered Page
Middle School unsuitable for use. Storms like
the November Nor’easter of 2009 also caused
flooding in the County. Increased flooding from
“typical” weather events has been noted over
the last decade, with less severe storms causing
flooding in portions of the County.
Soils
A current survey of Gloucester soils is available
from the Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS), part of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture.6
Map NE-1 shows soil types in the
County, according to the NRCS. The soils of
Gloucester County are formed from
unconsolidated marine sediments and vary
from east to west. Most of the area west of a
line running from Hayes north to Dutton
contains generally deep, well-drained
permeable soils, although it also contains some
sandy ravines. The majority of agricultural land
and forests are located in this part of the
County. To the east of this line, the County is
characterized by lower elevation and a high
percentage of soils with wetness problems.
These soils also have a high clay content that
6
This data can be viewed online through the
NRCS Web Soil Survey Tool at
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePa
ge.htm
4 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
restricts the movement of water and limits its
utility for a variety of land uses.
Soils are classified using a taxonomy developed
by the Natural Resources Conservation Service,
which has six levels: orders, suborders, great
groups, subgroups, families, and series.
Gloucester County's numerous soil types fall
under five different soil orders: histosols,
ultisols, alfisols, inceptisols, and entisols.
Histosols are composed mainly of decomposed
organic matter, such as that found in wetlands
or bogs. Ultisols are forest soils that have lost
much of their minerals which can support
agriculture. Alfisols are also forest soils, but
have retained more of their mineral nutrients
so are favorable for agriculture. Inceptisols are
relatively undeveloped soils. Entisols are the
most undeveloped, consisting of
unconsolidated material.7
Specific soil types, as
cataloged by the NRCS, are described in Table
NENR-1 and shown on Map NENR-1.
7
http://soils.cals.uidaho.edu/soilorders/index.htm
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
5
Table NENR-1: Soil Types
SOIL NAME ORDER DESCRIPTION
Alaga Entisols The Alaga series consists of very deep, excessively drained, rapidly
permeable soils on uplands and non-flooding stream and marine terraces
of the Coastal Plain. These soils consist of loamy sand. They formed in
sandy marine or fluvial sediments.
Caroline Ultisols The Caroline series consists of very deep, well drained soils of moderately
slow or slow permeability on marine terraces of the Coastal Plain. These
soils consist of loam, clay, and sandy clay loam. They formed in clayey
fluvial and marine sediments.
Craven Ultisols The Craven series consists of very deep, moderately well drained soils of
slow permeability found on marine terraces and uplands of the Coastal
Plain. These soils consist of silt loam, clay, and sandy clay loam. They
formed in marine deposits.
Dogue Ultisols The Dogue series consists of very deep, moderately well drained soils of
moderately slow permeability found on stream terraces of the Coastal
Plain. These soils consist of fine sandy loam, clay loam, and sandy loam.
They formed from marine deposits.
Emporia Ultisols The Emporia series consists of very deep, well drained soils of moderately
slow to slow permeability found on marine terraces and uplands of the
Coastal Plain. These soils consist of sandy loam, clay loam, and sandy clay
loam. They formed from marine deposits.
Eunola Ultisols The Eunola series consists of very deep, moderately well drained,
moderately permeable soils that formed in fluvial or marine sediments.
These soils consist of fine sandy loam and sandy clay loam. They are on
low stream or marine terraces of the Coastal Plain.
Fluvaquents Entisols Fluvaquents are found on flood plains on the Coastal Plain. They are very
deep, poorly drained, and moderately permeable. These soils consist of
loam, sandy clay loam, and gravelly sand. They formed from alluvium.
Fluvaquents,
saline
Entisols Fluvaquents are found on flood plains on the Coastal Plain. They are very
deep, poorly drained, and moderately permeable. These soils consist of
very fine and fine sandy loam. They formed from alluvium.
Hapludults Ultisols Hapludults are found on marine terraces of the Coastal Plain. They are
very deep, moderately well drained, and of moderately slow
permeability. These soils consist of fine sandy loam and sandy loam. They
formed from marine deposits.
Haplaquepts Inceptisols Haplaquepts are found on flats of the Coastal Plain. They are very deep,
somewhat poorly drained soils of moderately rapid permeability. These
soils consist of loam, sandy loam, and loamy sand. They formed from
marine deposits.
6 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
SOIL NAME ORDER DESCRIPTION
Johns Ultisols The Johns series consists of very deep, moderately well drained soils of
moderate permeability. They are found on stream terraces of the Middle
or Upper Coastal Plain or river valleys. These soils consist of sandy loam,
sandy clay loam, and loamy sand. They formed from alluvium or
fluviomarine deposits.
Kalmia Ultisols The Kalmia series consists of very deep, well drained soils of moderate
permeability. They are found on stream terraces on the Coastal Plain and
river valleys. These soils consist of sandy loam, sandy clay loam, and
loamy sand. They formed from marine deposits.
Kempsville Ultisols Soils of the Kempsville series are very deep, well drained, and moderately
permeable. These soils consist of fine sandy loam, sandy clay loam, and
stratified sandy loam. They formed in loamy sediments on the upper
Coastal Plain.
Kenansville Ultisols The Kenansville series consists of very deep, well drained, soils of
moderately rapid permeability found on Coastal Plain uplands and stream
terraces. These soils consist of loamy fine sand, sandy loam, and loamy
sand. They have formed in marine and fluvial sediments.
Lumbee Ultisols The Lumbee series consists of very deep, poorly drained soils of moderate
permeability found on stream terraces and flats on the Coastal Plain and
river valleys. These soils consist of sandy loam, sandy clay loam, and sand.
They formed from marine deposits.
Meggett Alfisols The Meggett series consists of very deep, poorly drained soils of slow
permeability found on marine terraces on the Coastal Plain. These soils
consist of sandy loam, sandy clay, and very gravelly sandy loam. They
formed from marine deposits.
Ochlockonee Entisols The Ochlockonee series consists of very deep, well drained soils of
moderately rapid permeability that formed from marine deposits. These
soils consist of sandy loam, stratified loamy sand, and stratified sandy clay
loam.
Ochraquults Ultisols Ochraquults are found on flats of the Coastal Plain. They are very deep,
poorly drained soils of moderate permeability. These soils consist of fine
sandy loam and loam. They formed from marine deposits.
Okeetee Alfisols The Okeetee series consists of very deep, somewhat poorly drained soils
of very slow to slow permeability found on marine terraces and stream
terraces on coastal plains and river valleys. These soils consist of sandy
loam and sandy clay. They formed from marine deposits.
Osier Entisols The Osier series consists of very deep, poorly drained, rapidly permeable
soils found on flood plains or low stream terraces of coastal plains. These
soils consist of loamy fine sand. They formed from marine deposits.
Pactolus Entisols The Pactolus series consists of very deep, moderately well drained soils of
rapid permeability found on marine terraces of coastal plains. These soils
consist of loamy sand. They formed from marine deposits.
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
7
SOIL NAME ORDER DESCRIPTION
Pamlico Histosols The Pamlico series consists of very deep, very poorly drained soils of
moderate to moderately rapid permeability found on depressions on
coastal plains. These soils consist of muck and sand. They formed from
organic material.
Portsmouth Ultisols The Portsmouth series consists of very deep, very poorly drained soils of
moderate permeability found on depressions on coastal plains. These
soils consist of loam, silt loam, and stratified loamy sand. They formed
from marine deposits.
Psamments Entisols Psamments are found on marine terraces on coastal plains. They are very
deep, moderately well drained soils of rapid permeability. These soils
consist of fine sand and sand. They formed from marine deposits.
Rumford Ultisols The Rumford series consists of very deep, well drained soils of moderately
rapid permeability found on marine terraces on coastal plains. These soils
consist of loamy fine sand, fine sandy loam, and stratified fine sand. They
formed from marine deposits.
Suffolk Ultisols The Suffolk series consists of very deep, well drained soils of moderate
permeability found on marine terraces on coastal plains. These soils
consist of fine sandy loam, sandy clay loam, and loamy sand. They formed
from marine deposits.
Sulfaquents Entisols Sulfaquents are found on salt marshes on coastal plains. They are very
deep, very poorly drained soils of very slow to slow permeability. These
soils consist of mucky silty clay loam and mucky silty clay.
Wrightsboro Ultisols The Wrightsboro series consists of very deep, moderately well drained
soils of moderate permeability found on stream terraces on coastal
plains. These soils consist of fine sandy loam and sandy clay loam. They
formed from marine deposits.
Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S Department of Agriculture
Soils are evaluated for their suitability for
common uses, primarily agriculture and
conventional septic systems. Typically, soils best
suited for agriculture are also the soils best
suited for conventional septic tank use.
Farmland classification of soils is shown on Map
NENR-2. Highly permeable soils are unsuitable
for conventional septic drain fields and are
shown on Map NENR-3. These classifications
help identify which areas are more suitable for
development.
Map NENR-4 shows that the majority of the
soils in the southeastern part of Gloucester are
classified as hydric, meaning that inundation
occurs for periods of time that are sufficient to
create anaerobic conditions. Hydric soils are
also found along streams and rivers throughout
the County. Although not all areas with hydric
soils are classified as wetlands, these areas
generally have a high water table and are
susceptible to poor drainage and flooding. They
are unsuitable for development or for
traditional septic systems.
8 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
Prior to the implementation of environmental
and land use regulations in the County,
residential and commercial uses developed in
the southeastern half of the County where the
soils are poorly suited for residential
development. Wastewater disposal and
protecting groundwater quality are soil-related
problems that could be aggravated by unguided
future development. The previous Gloucester
County Comprehensive Plan generally
coordinated the proposed Bayside District and
Resource Conservation District, which shows
large areas of soils unsuitable for traditional
septic system use or otherwise unsuitable for
high density or commercial development due to
physical constraints. The issues of water quality
and groundwater protection are discussed in
greater detail later in the chapter.
Slopes
Most of the County is relatively flat. Areas with
slopes greater than 15% are generally not
considered appropriate for building structures.
However Gloucester County does not have any
prohibition against building on steep slopes. In
Gloucester County, most of the areas with high
slopes are along streams and other water
bodies. These are shown on Map NENR-5.
Prime Farmland
Agriculture is an important part of Gloucester
County’s history and economy. Identifying areas
that are well suited for farming is an important
step in preserving those areas for agricultural
uses. The NRCS identifies areas that are
appropriate for farming through its soil surveys.
Gloucester County possesses over 53,000 acres
of prime farmland, over 22,000 acres of land
that would be considered prime farmland if
properly drained, and over 7,500 acres of
farmland that is of statewide importance. The
NRCS classifies farmland based on its potential
agricultural productivity. Prime farmland is
considered the best for agricultural use in terms
of climate, location, physical and chemical
properties, available water supply,
permeability, and erosion potential. Farmland
of statewide importance is land that is not quite
as good as prime farmland for agricultural uses
or that requires additional treatment to
produce high agricultural yields. The precise
definition of farmland of statewide importance
varies by state, while prime farmland meets a
national standard. The County’s prime farmland
is shown on Map NENR-2. When considering
areas of the County for future land use, it is
important to identify the prime soils so that the
areas identified on the future land use plan for
agriculture and forestry coincide with these
prime soils.
Watersheds and Drainage
A watershed is an area of land from which all
water, sediments, nutrients, and other
dissolved materials drain into a common outlet.
When precipitation occurs, water runs to the
lowest point, usually a stream, river, or lake and
eventually the ocean. Gloucester County lies
entirely within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed,
which includes parts of six states (Delaware,
Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and
West Virginia) and the District of Columbia.
These watersheds, or drainage units, cover
Gloucester County's entire land surface and
eventually contribute to the major rivers.
Everything that happens to a watershed can
affect what ends up in the water.
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
9
Table NENR-2: Gloucester County Streams
STREAM NAME DRAINAGE
AREA
(SQ. MILES)
LENGTH
(MILES)
ELEVATION
AT SOURCE
(FEET)
ELEVATION
AT MOUTH
(FEET)
MOUTH IN
COUNTY
Sandy Creek 0.94 2.0 42 0 Gloucester
Jones Creek 4.37 3.9 93 0 Gloucester
Aberdeen Creek 3.26 3.4 84 0 Gloucester
Carter Creek 8.51 6.4 90 0 Gloucester
Cedarbush Creek 2.57 3.7 61 0 Gloucester
Timberneck Creek 3.83 4.1 62 0 Gloucester
Sarah Creek 5.22 0.3 0 0 Gloucester
Northwest Branch 2.96 2.5 11 0 Gloucester
Northeast Branch 2.16 2.3 7 0 Gloucester
Poropotank River 39.19 15.6 123 0 King & Queen,
Gloucester
Unnamed Stream 2.44 3.3 135 0 King & Queen,
Gloucester
Woods Mill Swamp 4.92 4.6 131 0 King & Queen,
Gloucester
Poplar Spring Branch 6.26 4.6 107 0 King & Queen,
Gloucester
Adams Creek 2.87 4.5 100 0 Gloucester
Purtan Creek 1.47 2.9 101 0 Gloucester
Leigh Creek 1.40 2.2 100 0 Gloucester
Bland Creek 5.74 4.7 102 0 Gloucester
Fox Creek 2.92 1.7 52 0 Gloucester
Source: Gloucester County
Thus, effective flood control, conservation of
fresh water, enhancement of water quality, and
control of soil erosion and sedimentation make
land use practices throughout the watershed
almost as important as those located directly on
the shorelines.
The land area occupied by Gloucester County is
drained by the York, Piankatank, North, Ware,
and Severn rivers and their tributaries. Major
stream segments in the County that drain
watersheds to the County's creeks and rivers
are identified in Table NENR-12. The County’s
subwatersheds (Hydrologic Unit Code 12), as
cataloged by the United States Geological
Survey (USGS), are shown on Map NENR-6.
Sources of Potable Water and Water
Use
Present water use is a product of local
geography, water needs, transportation
patterns and requirements, social and economic
forces, and development patterns. Water
10 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
resources are critical to the physical and
economic health of the community as well as
the natural environment. Many practices have
the potential to severely degrade the water
quality and quantity. Many of these practices
and threats were cataloged through the
Hampton Roads Source Water Assessment
Program. This program resulted in a Regional
Source Water Assessment for the region’s
surface water sources, which documented land
uses and threats within critical areas related to
surface water supplies.8
Gloucester County began delivering water
services from the Beaverdam Reservoir and
associated water treatment plant in July 1990.
The Beaverdam Reservoir is located north of
the Gloucester Court House area and is
surrounded primarily by low density zoning with
two to five acre minimum lot sizes. The County
owns an approximately 300-foot to 600-foot
wide buffer surrounding the reservoir, which
makes up Beaverdam Park. The Park is used for
passive recreational activities such as fishing,
boating, nature study, picnics, hiking, bicycling,
and horseback riding. Water quality is
monitored weekly through algae counts. A
survey is conducted every three years to
evaluate development around the reservoir.
Other than the various County ordinances
affecting land use and development, there are
no special requirements or overlay district
around the reservoir to prevent or manage
pollution of the surface water. The existing
buffer area and low density zoning have been
sufficient thus far to protect water quality. The
8
CH2M Hill. Regional Source Water
Assessment. Prepared for the Hampton Roads
Planning District Commission Directors of
Utilities Committee and Hampton Roads Source
Water Assessment Program Subcommittee. July
2001
County should consider additional requirements
if deemed necessary as a result of routine water
quality monitoring. Increasing regulations with
regard to surface water protection will require
the County to adopt more protective measures
should the development around the reservoir
continue. The County also has two wells. More
information regarding the county water supply
is found in the Community Facilities section of
this plan.
Regional Water Supply Planning
In 2007, sixteen cities and counties and eight
towns signed a Memorandum of Agreement to
develop a Regional Water Supply Plan for
Hampton Roads. In July 2011, the Hampton
Roads Planning District Commission accepted
the plan and authorized its distribution to local
governments for adoption. The regional plan
enables the localities to meet the water supply
planning requirements of the Commonwealth
of Virginia, 9 VAC 25-780. The purposes of this
regulation are to (1) ensure that adequate and
safe drinking water is available to all citizens of
the Commonwealth, (2) encourage, promote,
and protect all other beneficial uses of the
Commonwealth’s water resources, and (3)
encourage, promote, and develop incentives for
alternative water sources. The regional plan
covers the existing water supply, future water
needs and alternatives, and water demand
management information and drought response
plans.
In accordance with the Code of Virginia as well
as the State Water Control Board
implementation regulations a regional water
supply plan was prepared by staff of HRPDC.
This Plan was prepared for the Cities of
Chesapeake, Franklin, Hampton, Newport
News, Norfolk, Poquoson, Portsmouth, Suffolk,
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
11
Virginia Beach, and Williamsburg and the
Counties of Gloucester, Isle of Wight, James
City, Southampton, Surry, and York as well as
the Towns of Boykins, Branchville, Capron,
Claremont, Courtland, Dendron, Ivor, Newsoms,
Smithfield, Surry, and Windsor. The plan was
adopted by the Gloucester County Board of
Supervisors in August of 2011. As of November
2011, all of the localities had adopted the plan,
which was then submitted to DEQ. The Plan
includes elements describing existing water use,
assessment of projected water demand,
statement of need, alternatives analysis,
descriptions of water management and drought
response actions. In the Plan Gloucester is
classified as part of the Peninsula sub-region.
Groundwater Framework
Gloucester County is located within the Virginia
Coastal Plain Physiographic Province, which
extends from the Fall Line in the west to the
Atlantic Ocean in the east, and from the
Maryland border in the north to the North
Carolina border in the south. The surface of the
Virginia Coastal Plain consists of a series of
broad, gently sloping, highly dissected north-
south trending terraces bounded by seaward
facing, ocean cut escarpments. The subsurface
is characterized by wedge-shaped
unconsolidated sedimentary deposits that slope
and thicken towards the east. The thickness of
this wedge ranges from 0 feet at the western
edge to over 6,000 feet along the Atlantic coast
(McFarland and Bruce, 2006). These deposits
consist of clay, silt, sand, and gravel, with
variable amounts of shell material. These
sediments overlay a bedrock basement of
igneous and metamorphic rocks that also slopes
gently to the east.
Many different depositional environments
existed during the formation of the Virginia
Coastal Plain deposits. In general, the
stratigraphic section (vertical profile) consists of
a thick sequence of non-marine (riverine and
alluvial) sedimentary deposits overlain by a
thinner sequence of marine (near shore beach,
estuarine, and delta) sedimentary deposits.
Beneath Gloucester there are also breccia type
sedimentary deposits associated with the
Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater (see Map NR-7).
The groundwater flow system in the Coastal
Plain of Virginia is a multi-aquifer system. The
most recent study of the hydrogeologic
framework was completed by USGS in 2006
(McFarland and Bruce, 2006). Based on the
framework, there are eight water bearing
hydrogeologic units (aquifers) and eleven less
permeable units that restrict groundwater flow
(confining zones and confining units). The
aquifers and confining units are stacked on top
of each other and often alternate. Because of
this configuration, flow in the aquifers primarily
is lateral instead of vertical. The flow moves
eastward and toward large withdrawal centers
and major discharge areas near large rivers and
the Atlantic coast. However, the flow pattern is
disrupted by the Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater,
which was formed over 35 million years ago
when an asteroid or comet landed near the
mouth of the Chesapeake Bay and created a
crater over 50 miles in diameter. The impact of
the asteroid or comet obliterated the deepest
aquifers. A mixture of materials rushed into the
crater and created a layer of sediments
(breccia) unique from the non-marine
sediments present before the impact.
As illustrated in Figure NE-1, the groundwater
system beneath Gloucester County is comprised
of five aquifers and five confining units. The
12 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
Columbia aquifer, also referred to as the
surficial aquifer, is the water table aquifer
throughout most of Gloucester. In some areas,
the Columbia aquifer and confining unit below
it have been incised by the bay so the
Yorktown-Eastover aquifer is the water table
aquifer. In other parts of the county, the
Yorktown-Eastover aquifer is a confined aquifer,
covered by the Yorktown-Eastover confining
unit.
The Piney Point aquifer, Aquia aquifer, and the
Potomac aquifer are all deeper confined
aquifers underlying Gloucester. The confined
aquifers are separated from aquifers above and
below by confining beds. The northwest portion
of the Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater covers the
southern third of Gloucester. The Aquia and
Potomac aquifers existed before the crater
impact so both aquifers were obliterated in the
southern portion of Gloucester. They were
replaced by the breccia formed by the impact.
The breccia has a low conductivity and contains
stagnant saltwater in its pore spaces. The
regional groundwater flow appears to diverge
and flow around the crater rim. The Piney Point
aquifer was deposited after the crater impact
and is present across the entire county. The
following paragraphs provide a general
description of the aquifers identified in
Gloucester from youngest to oldest (top to
bottom).
Columbia Aquifer
The Columbia aquifer is the uppermost aquifer
and is unconfined throughout its extent. It
consists of sand and gravel. The Columbia
aquifer is used primarily for domestic water
supplies (drinking water and irrigation). Because
it is shallow and easily accessible, it has
historically been an important water source.
However, it is susceptible to drought and
contamination and is less reliable than confined
aquifers. In favorable conditions, wells may
yield 10 gallons per minute or more (McFarland
and Bruce, 2006).
Yorktown-Eastover Aquifer
The Yorktown-Eastover aquifer is composed of
sand with some interbedded silt. The Yorktown-
Eastover aquifer is separated from the
Columbia aquifer by the Yorktown confining
zone. The confining zone leaks more than a
confining unit and in some areas the Yorktown
confining zone may function as an aquifer. In
cross section, the Yorktown-Eastover aquifer is
wedge-shaped, sloping, and thickening to the
east. In Gloucester, the top of the aquifer is
roughly 50 to 75ft below ground surface.
Numerous wells withdraw water from the
Yorktown-Eastover aquifer and it typically yields
high-quality water. Wells commonly produce 10
to 30 gallons per minute.
Piney Point Aquifer
The Piney Point aquifer is a homogenous, sandy
aquifer. It extends over the entire county
including the impact crater. In Gloucester, the
top of the Piney Point aquifer is approximately
250 to 400ft below ground surface and wells
commonly yield 10 to 50 gallons per minute
(McFarland and Bruce, 2006). The Piney Point
aquifer includes two formations. The upper
formation is rarely used for water supplies
because of low yields and the prevalence of
hydrogen sulfide. The lower formation is a more
effective water producing zone. However, the
Piney Point aquifer as a whole is not used
across the crater where sediments contain
brackish water.
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
Figure NE-1: Hydrogeology of the Coastal Plain of Virginia
Source: The Virginia Coastal Plain Hydrologic Framework
Aquia Aquifer
The Aquia aquifer only exists in the northwest
portion of Gloucester. It is composed of
medium to coarse sands. It is less than 50ft
thick and is approximately 400ft below ground
surface. Wells in the Aquia aquifer may yield as
little as 5 gallons per minute or as much as 50
gallons per minute. Typically, the glauconitic
sands found in the Aquia aquifer eventually
weather and clog well screens and produce
poor water quality. Also, it is very likely that in
Gloucester the Aquia aquifer contains brackish
water (McFarland and Bruce, 2006).
Potomac Aquifer
The Potomac aquifer is the deepest and thickest
aquifer in Virginia’s Coastal Plain. The aquifer is
composed of sand and gravel with many large
clay interbeds. In previous studies, the Potomac
aquifer was defined as three aquifers.
the most recent hydrogeologic stud
that it is hydraulically continuous on a regional
scale and the clay interbeds affect flow on a
1: Hydrogeology of the Coastal Plain of Virginia
Source: The Virginia Coastal Plain Hydrologic Framework
The Aquia aquifer only exists in the northwest
It is composed of
It is less than 50ft
thick and is approximately 400ft below ground
Wells in the Aquia aquifer may yield as
little as 5 gallons per minute or as much as 50
Typically, the glauconitic
sands found in the Aquia aquifer eventually
weather and clog well screens and produce
Also, it is very likely that in
Gloucester the Aquia aquifer contains brackish
water (McFarland and Bruce, 2006).
is the deepest and thickest
aquifer in Virginia’s Coastal Plain. The aquifer is
composed of sand and gravel with many large
In previous studies, the Potomac
aquifer was defined as three aquifers. However,
the most recent hydrogeologic study indicated
that it is hydraulically continuous on a regional
scale and the clay interbeds affect flow on a
localized scale. In Gloucester, the top of the
aquifer is roughly 500ft below ground surface in
the western part of the county and dips to over
1000ft below ground surface in the eastern part
of the county. The Potomac aquifer is the most
heavily used groundwater resource in the
Virginia Coastal Plain. In 2005, about 90 percent
of the reported annual withdrawals were from
the Potomac aquifer. Major wa
completed in the central and southeastern
parts of the Coastal Plain have yielded 100 to
500 gallons per minute (McFarland and Bruce,
2006). However, the water is generally brackish
and desalination is required to make it suitable
for domestic or industrial use.
Groundwater Recharge and
Discharge Areas
Groundwater flow in unconfined aquifers tends
to reflect surface water flow. Groundwater
flows from areas of relatively high elevation to
adjacent areas of relatively low elevation.
13
In Gloucester, the top of the
aquifer is roughly 500ft below ground surface in
the western part of the county and dips to over
ft below ground surface in the eastern part
The Potomac aquifer is the most
heavily used groundwater resource in the
In 2005, about 90 percent
of the reported annual withdrawals were from
Major water supply wells
completed in the central and southeastern
parts of the Coastal Plain have yielded 100 to
500 gallons per minute (McFarland and Bruce,
However, the water is generally brackish
and desalination is required to make it suitable
stic or industrial use.
Groundwater Recharge and
Groundwater flow in unconfined aquifers tends
to reflect surface water flow. Groundwater
flows from areas of relatively high elevation to
adjacent areas of relatively low elevation.
14 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
Groundwater recharge can occur across almost
any upland surface. Land surfaces with steep
slopes are less effective groundwater recharge
areas than broad and relatively flat grassy
uplands. Groundwater recharge occurs when
rainwater that percolates into the ground
enters the unconfined (water table) aquifer.
Research also suggests that in some areas of
the Coastal Plain groundwater recharge occurs
between aquifers (Meng, A.A. III, and Harsh,
J.F., 1988). This occurs when the hydraulic
pressure of groundwater in one aquifer forces
water through a leaky confining unit into an
adjacent aquifer. This movement can be either
up or down based on the hydraulic properties
of the aquifers. The location and magnitude of
recharge between the aquifers, however, has
not been well documented.
Groundwater discharge areas are located in
low-lying areas and are characterized by rivers,
springs, and wetlands. Discharge areas for the
confined aquifers may occur off the coast
beneath the Atlantic Ocean or beneath the
Chesapeake Bay.
Air Quality
As a requirement of the Clean Air Act, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
maintains National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) for certain criteria
pollutants including ozone, carbon monoxide,
and particulate matter (40 CFR 50). These
standards are implemented in Virginia by the
state Department of Environmental Quality and
are designed to protect the public health and to
prevent harm to the environment. When a
geographic area meets these standards, the
area is known as an attainment area, however if
an area fails to meet these standards, then the
EPA designates the area as nonattainment.
A designated nonattainment area must develop
a plan to bring the region into compliance with
the NAAQS which it is failing to meet. In
addition to developing this plan, known as a
State Implementation Plan (SIP), the area must
also implement transportation conformity
requirements. Transportation conformity
requires all regional transportation plans,
programs, and projects to be analyzed to
ensure conformity with the EPA’s
Transportation Conformity Rule (40 CFR 93).
The EPA must review and concur with this
analysis before the Federal Highway
Administration can approve it. Any changes to
the regional Air Quality transportation plans,
programs, and projects after a conformity
approval is received, must be re-analyzed and
approved before the change can occur.
Transportation conformity is required for 20
years after an area is able to demonstrate
compliance with the NAAQS. During this 20-
year maintenance period, the maintenance
area, as classified by the EPA, must maintain a
SIP to ensure continued compliance with the
NAAQS.
Hampton Roads is currently classified as an 8-
hour ozone maintenance area. The Hampton
Roads ozone maintenance area includes the
counties of Gloucester, Isle of Wight, James
City, and York, along with the cities of
Chesapeake, Hampton, Newport News, Norfolk,
Poquoson, Portsmouth, Suffolk, Virginia Beach,
and Williamsburg. EPA is expected to revise the
ozone standard sometime in the next few years.
This is likely to result in the reclassification of
Hampton Roads as a nonattainment area for
ozone. The main contributors to air quality
deficiencies are heavy industry and automobile
traffic. Although Gloucester lacks heavy
industry that contributes to air pollution,
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
15
surrounding areas do contain industries and
high levels of traffic that impact local air quality.
Current limits on open burning and potential
alternative transportation plans that reduce
traffic congestion will produce positive effects
on local air quality, although these measures
will not prevent regional nonattainment
designation.
Plants and Animals
The Virginia Department of Conservation and
Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage (DCR-
DNH), and the Department of Game and Inland
Fisheries' Fish and Wildlife Information System
maintain inventories of wildlife resources and
habitats for Gloucester County. The Virginia Fish
and Wildlife Information Service Website
currently lists 446 different species found in
Gloucester County. These include quail, dove,
rabbit, wild turkey, hawks and owls, songbirds,
turtles and amphibians, raccoon, beaver,
opossum, muskrat, skunk, squirrel, woodchuck
and white-tailed deer. Bald Eagles have nest
sites established in the County. Tidal
marshlands attract Sora Rail and Clapper Rail,
and numerous varieties of wild ducks and other
waterfowl. Freshwater fish include large and
small-mouth bass and bream. Saltwater fish
include shad, croaker, spot, bluefish, channel
and black sea bass, menhaden, mackerel, eel,
white and silver perch, and a variety of other
saltwater species.
Natural Heritage Resources
The Virginia Department of Conservation and
Recreation’s Division of Natural Heritage
defines natural heritage resources as the
habitat of rare, threatened, or endangered
plant and animal species, unique or exemplary
natural communities, and significant geologic
formations such as caves and karst features.
Twenty-eight species and communities in
Gloucester County have been designated by
DCR as natural heritage resources (Table NENR-
X3).
DCR identifies and protects natural heritage
resources statewide and maintains a
comprehensive database of all documented
occurrences of natural heritage resources in
Virginia. DCR has developed conservation sites
that contain known populations of natural
heritage resources and include adjacent or
surrounding habitat vital for their protection.
Conservation sites do not represent protected
lands; rather, they are recommended for
protection and stewardship because of the
natural heritage resources and habitat they
support, but are not currently under any official
protection designation. Conservation sites are
areas that contain one or more rare plant,
animal, or natural community and are designed
to include the element, its associated habitat
(where possible), and a buffer or other adjacent
land thought necessary for the element’s
conservation. Conservation sites can be used to
screen development projects for potential
impacts to natural heritage resources, aid local
and regional planning, identify targets for
acquisitions and easements and guide priorities
for restoration activities.
A prominent example of a conservation site in
Gloucester County is the Dragon Run
Conservation Site, which contains multiple rare
species and habitat types. The Dragon Run
supports an abundance of fish, wildlife, and
plants, including ancient cypress trees. There
are six natural heritage resources associated
with the Dragon Run Conservation Site: the Bald
Eagles, the Red Turtlehead, Bald Cypress Mixed
Tupelo Intermediate Swamp, Northern Coastal
Plain Tidal Bald Cypress Woodland, Tidal
16 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
Oligohaline Marsh (Narrow-leaved Cattail –
Eastern Rose – Mallow Type), and Tidal
Freshwater Marsh (Wild Rice – Mixed Forbs
type). The Dragon Run’s natural ecosystem has
survived primarily because the area is largely
undeveloped – about 80 percent of the area is
forested and the rest is primarily agricultural.
Conservation sites are given a biodiversity
significance ranking based on rarity, quality, and
the number of element occurrences they
contain; rankings are based on a scale of one to
five, with one being the most significant. The
Dragon Run Conservation Site has been given a
biodiversity ranking of B2, which represents a
site of very high significance. In addition to the
Dragon Run Conservation Site, there are
twenty-four (24) other conservation sites in
Gloucester County (Table NENR-X 4 and Map
NENR-X8).
The Dragon Run watershed is one of the most
important, largely undisturbed natural areas
remaining in Gloucester County. Located along
Gloucester’s northern boundary, this still
pristine spring-fed waterway has been the
subject of intensive study by local, regional, and
state agencies. The Dragon Run Special Area
Management Plan, produced by a partnership
between the Dragon Run Steering Committee,
the Middle Peninsula Planning District
Commission, and the Virginia Coastal Zone
Management Program, part of the Department
of Environmental Quality (DEQ), was completed
in November 2003. The plan represents a
common vision developed by multiple
stakeholders and contains an action plan and
benchmarks to measure progress in the effort
to conserve the resources of the Dragon Run
watershed. Gloucester County adopted the
Dragon Run Watershed Management Plan as an
addendum to the Comprehensive Plan in
November 2004.
The Dragon Run and its surrounding landscape
owe their extraordinary state of preservation to
the landowners in the area that have pursued
compatible land uses such as farming and
forestry. Recent scientific studies have also
highlighted the watershed’s critical ecological
importance to the region and its ecological
value, including the purity of its water, the
wealth of rare and unusual natural species it
harbors, and the rural character of this pristine
watershed. The rural way of life and traditional
landscape in the Dragon Run Watershed are
both valued by the residents of the area and
considered worthy of conservation. One of the
objectives of the Watershed Management Plan
is to “Achieve consistency across county
boundaries among land use plans and
regulations in order to maintain farming and
forestry and to preserve natural heritage areas
by protecting plants, animals, natural
communities, and aquatic systems.” As a result,
the future land use plan identifies the
watershed as the Dragon Run Conservation
District and provides recommendations for this
area to continue to remain largely rural, with
low intensity uses, so as to sustain its key
natural areas, water quality and rural character.
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
17
Table NENR-X3: Natural Heritage Resources
GROUP
NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LAST YEAR
OBSERVED
GLOBAL
RANK
FWS
SPECIES OF
CONCERN
STATE
RANK
FEDERAL
STATUS
STATE
STATUS
Terrestrial
Natural
Community
Acer rubrum - Fraxinus
pennsylvanica / Packera
aurea - Carex bromoides -
Pilea fontana - Bidens
laevis Forest
Coastal Plain Calcareous
Seepage Swamp
2010 G2 SOC S2
Vertebrate
Animal
Ambystoma mabeei Mabee's Salamander 2010 G4 S1S2 LT
Vertebrate
Animal
Ammodramus caudacutus Saltmarsh Sharp-tailed
Sparrow
1992 G4 S2B,
S3N
Vascular
Plant
Cardamine pratensis Cuckooflower 2010 G5 S1
Vascular
Plant
Carex reniformis Reniform Sedge 1964 G4? SH
Vascular
Plant
Chelone obliqua Red Turtlehead 1999 G4 S1
Vertebrate
Animal
Circus cyaneus Northern Harrier 1992 G5 S1S2B,
S3N
Vascular
Plant
Cuscuta cephalanthi Button-bush Dodder 1970 G5 S1?
Vascular
Plant
Cuscuta indecora Pretty Dodder 1997 G5 S2?
Vascular
Plant
Eleocharis tricostata Three-angle Spikerush 1938 G4 S1
Vascular
Plant
Eriocaulon parkeri Parker's Pipewort 1986 G3 S2
18 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
GROUP
NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LAST YEAR
OBSERVED
GLOBAL
RANK
FWS
SPECIES OF
CONCERN
STATE
RANK
FEDERAL
STATUS
STATE
STATUS
Terrestrial
Natural
Community
Fagus grandifolia - Acer
barbatum - Quercus
muhlenbergii /
Sanguinaria canadensis
Forest
Coastal Plain Calcareous
Ravine Forest
2005 G2? SOC S2
Terrestrial
Natural
Community
Fagus grandifolia -
Quercus (alba, rubra) -
Liriodendron tulipifera /
(Ilex opaca var. opaca) /
Polystichum
acrostichoides Forest
Northern Coastal Plain /
Piedmont Mesic Mixed
Hardwood Forest
2010 G5 S5
Terrestrial
Natural
Community
Fagus grandifolia -
Quercus (alba, velutina,
montana) / Kalmia
latifolia Forest
Northern Coastal Plain /
Piedmont Oak - Beech /
Heath Forest
2010 G4 S3
Vertebrate
Animal
Falco peregrinus Peregrine Falcon 1994 G4 S1B,
S2N
LT
Vertebrate
Animal
Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle 2002 G5 S2S3B,
S3N
LT
Vascular
Plant
Isotria medeoloides Small Whorled Pogonia 1997 G2 S2 LT LE
Aquatic
Natural
Community
NC-Great Wicomico-
Piankatank First Order
Stream
NC-Great Wicomico-
Piankatank First Order
Stream
2011 G3 S3
Aquatic
Natural
Community
NC-Great Wicomico-
Piankatank Fourth Order
Stream
NC-Great Wicomico-
Piankatank Fourth Order
Stream
2011 G1G2 SOC S1S2
Aquatic
Natural
Community
NC-Great Wicomico-
Piankatank Second Order
Stream
NC-Great Wicomico-
Piankatank Second Order
Stream
2011 G3 S3
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
19
GROUP
NAME
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LAST YEAR
OBSERVED
GLOBAL
RANK
FWS
SPECIES OF
CONCERN
STATE
RANK
FEDERAL
STATUS
STATE
STATUS
Vertebrate
Animal
Nyctanassa violacea Yellow-crowned Night-
heron
1976 G5 S2S3B,
S3N
Vascular
Plant
Sabatia campanulata Slender Marsh Pink 1965 G5 S2
Vascular
Plant
Schoenoplectus fluviatilis River Bulrush 1995 G5 S2
Terrestrial
Natural
Community
Taxodium distichum -
Nyssa (biflora, aquatica) /
Itea virginica / Saururus
cernuus Forest
Bald Cypress - Mixed
Tupelo Intermediate
Swamp
2000 G3G4 S3S4
Terrestrial
Natural
Community
Taxodium distichum -
Nyssa biflora - Fraxinus
profunda / Peltandra
virginica - (Bignonia
capreolata) Tidal Forest
Northern Coastal Plain
Tidal Bald Cypress
Woodland
2000 G3 S2
Vascular
Plant
Trillium pusillum var.
virginianum
Virginia Least Trillium 1984 G3T2 SOC S2
Terrestrial
Natural
Community
Typha angustifolia -
Hibiscus moscheutos Tidal
Herbaceous Vegetation
Tidal Oligohaline Marsh
(Narrow-Leaved Cattail -
Eastern Rose-Mallow Type)
1999 G4G5 S3?
Terrestrial
Natural
Community
Zizania aquatica -
Pontederia cordata -
Peltandra virginica -
Polygonum punctatum
Tidal Herbaceous
Vegetation
Tidal Freshwater Marsh
(Wild Rice - Mixed Forbs
Type)
2000 G4? S4?
20 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
TERM DEFINITION
S1 Critically imperiled in the state because of extreme rarity or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extirpation
from the state. Typically 5 or fewer populations or occurrences, or very few remaining individuals (<1000).
S2 Imperiled in the state because of rarity or because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extirpation from the state. Typically 6
to 20 populations or occurrences or few remaining individuals (1,000 to 3,000).
S3 Vulnerable in the state either because rare and uncommon, or found only in a restricted range (even if abundant at some locations),
or because of other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation. Typically having 21 to 100 populations or occurrences (1,000 to 3,000
individuals).
S4 Apparently secure; Uncommon but not rare, and usually widespread in the state. Possible cause of long-term concern. Usually having
>100 populations or occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals.
S5 Secure; Common, widespread and abundant in the state. Essentially ineradicable under present conditions, typically having
considerably more than 100 populations or occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals.
S#B Breeding status of an animal within the state.
S#N Non-breeding status of animal within the state. Usually applied to winter resident species.
S#? Inexact or uncertain numeric rank.
SH Possibly extirpated (Historical). Historically known from the state, but not verified for an extended period, usually > 15 years; this rank
is used primarily when inventory has been attempted recently.
S#S# Range rank; A numeric range rank, (e.g. S2S3) is used to indicate the range of uncertainty about the exact status of the element.
Ranges cannot skip more than one rank.
LE Listed Endangered
LT Listed Threatened
SOC Species of Concern species that merit special concern (not a regulatory category)
Federal designations are developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State designations are developed by the Virginia Department of
Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage.
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
21
Table NENR-X4: Natural Heritage Conservation Sites
SITE NAME BIODIVERSITY RANK LEGAL STATUS
Bar Neck B5 SL
Beaverdam Creek Slopes B2 NL
Beech Swamp Uplands B5 SL
Bena Woodlands B5 SL
Carvers Creek at Route 198 (SCU) B4 NL
Carvers Creek B5 SL
Catlett Islands B5 SL
Church Hill Pond B4 SL
Coleman Bridge B5 SL
Dragon Run B2 SL
Dragon Run (SCU) B2 NL
Ferry Creek Ravine B2 NL
Ferry Creek Upstream Route 198 (SCU) B4 NL
Four Point Marsh B5 NL
Harper Creek B5 SL
Heywood Creek B5 SL
Leigh Creek B5 SL
Maryus – Guinea Marshes B5 SL
Piankatank B5 SL
Robins Pond Headwaters B3 FL
Rosewell B2 SL
Shepherdsville Church B5 SL
Signpine B5 SL
White Marsh Pond B5 SL
Woods Mill Swamp B5 SL
Source: Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage
TERM DEFINITION
SCU Stream Conservation Unit
B1 Outstanding Significance
B2 Very High Significance
B3 High Significance
B4 Moderate Significance
B5 General Interest
FL Federally listed species present
SL State listed species present
NL No listed species present
22 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
Important Bird Areas
The Important Bird Areas (IBA) program is a
global conservation effort coordinated by the
National Audubon Society. IBAs are sites that
provide essential habitat for one or more
species of birds. IBAs may be a few acres or
thousands of acres, but they are usually discrete
sites that stand out from the surrounding
landscape. IBAs may include public or private
lands, or both, and they may be protected or
unprotected. The Virginia IBA Program is a
grassroots effort representing all regions of the
state. The program identifies areas that are
most important for nesting, mating, feeding,
and wintering birds and, once identified, works
to protect these areas through partnerships
with local and state agencies and other groups.
IBAs in Gloucester County are shown on Map
NENR-79. These areas can be considered for
protection or conservation status as part of the
County’s future land use plan.
Forest and Farmland
Vegetation serves important functions in
maintaining the land and supporting
development by stabilizing the soil, preventing
erosion, increasing soil permeability, and
decreasing stormwater runoff. Vegetation also
serves as a buffer for adjacent land uses,
lessens the impact of noise, wind and heat,
improves air quality, and provides habitat for
wildlife. Although much of the land in the
southeast portion of Gloucester County (which
is the most suitable for growing loblolly and
Virginia pine) has been lost to residential
development, there are still large undeveloped
portions of the County devoted to forestry uses.
Good to fair soils occur throughout most of the
northern and western portions of the County
where the majority of forested acres include
loblolly and Virginia pine. Other species grown
and harvested as sawtimber commonly include
yellow poplar, red oak, white oak, sweet and
black gum, sycamore, ash, and some red maple.
About 800 to 1,000 acres are planted by the
Virginia Department of Forestry each year in
Gloucester County. Almost all reforestation
involves loblolly pine seedlings planted at 450
to 500 trees per acre. Even with reforestation at
this level, it is doubtful that the present
production of forest products in Gloucester can
be maintained in the future due to the large
scale conversion of forest land to other uses.
The latest available forest surveys indicated
that total forested acres in the County included
approximately 89,000 acres of privately owned
forest land and 500 acres of public land (U.S.
Forest Service, 2007). The 2007 Census of
Agriculture, published by the U.S. Department
of Agriculture, indicated that there were 159
active farms in Gloucester. Land in farms
totaled 22,957 acres with an average farm size
of 144 acres. Most of the farms, approximately
70%, were devoted to cropland. Soybeans, corn,
and wheat were commonly produced crops.
The 2007 Census also reported that Gloucester
County had 3,738 acres of farmland being used
as woodland, down 741 acres from 2002. Many
more acres are currently being utilized by the
forest industry or fall under private ownership.
Figures are continually changing due to trends
in absentee ownership and corporate land
holdings.
One of the County’s future land use goals is to
preserve the rural character of the community.
This can be achieved in a variety of ways;
however the preservation of an active
agricultural economy contributes to rural
character while also providing economic
benefits. In order to preserve viable agriculture
and forestry in the midst of a growing
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
23
residential population, more active support of
agriculture and forestry may be needed. This
can be done through practical land use policies
and local regulations that support profitability
of these industries while also recognizing and
accommodating for the changing nature of
agriculture.
Critical Areas
The regulations of the Chesapeake Bay
Preservation Act (CBPA) require that local
comprehensive plans address existing natural
limitations of the land that can act as physical
constraints to development. These may include:
flood prone areas, highly erodible soils, highly
permeable soils, wetlands, steep slopes, hydric
soils, seasonally high water tables, groundwater
recharge areas, significant wildlife habitat areas,
prime agricultural lands, and protected lands.
An assessment of soils for septic tank suitability
is also required, although engineered septic
systems now allow for development where soils
are unsuitable for traditional septic systems.
Gloucester County adopted a CBPA ordinance
as the cornerstone of its response to state and
interstate efforts to help protect and restore
the Bay. As part of the ordinance, Gloucester
designated CBPA areas that apply to all
property in the County. Sensitive areas such as
tidal shores, wetlands, and highly erodible soils
are designated as Resource Protection Areas
(RPAs) and include minimum 100-foot wide
riparian buffers landward of these
environmentally sensitive areas. All other lands
in the County are classified as Resource
Management Areas (RMAs), and are intended
to protect the integrity of the RPAs. As a result,
the County’s CBPA Ordinance acts as an overlay
district for the entire County regardless of the
zoning district. Gloucester County’s Site Plan
Handbook summarizes the County’s
Chesapeake Bay regulations in checklist form
and includes stormwater calculation
worksheets that can be used by developers to
achieve compliance with pollutant removal
requirements.
Shorelines
Shoreline conditions are described along
primary and secondary shorelines, and
characteristics are described for all contiguous
navigable tidal waterways. The report covers
492.46 miles of the total 506.6 miles of
shoreline, with approximately 98 miles coded
remotely.9
The shoreline of Gloucester County
is made up primarily of various types of marsh.
The only segments of the Gloucester shore not
considered low shore are along the York River
from the Poropotank River to Sarah Creek. In
this area, much of the land is classified as
moderately low shore with bluffs ranging in
height from 20 to 40 feet. The rest of the shore
zone is composed of beaches. According to the
Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS),
three beaches – near Fox Creek, around
Gloucester Point, and on lower Jenkins Neck
around Sandy Point – have the potential for
medium- to high-intensity recreational uses
(2008).
Natural and Altered Shoreline Features
The Gloucester County, Virginia Shoreline
Inventory Report produced by VIMS indicates
9
The Gloucester County Shoreline Inventory
Report includes thirty-four map plates and a
summary table describing shoreline conditions.
They are available online through the VIMS
Center for Coastal Resources Management
website at
http://ccrm.vims.edu/gis_data_maps/shoreline_i
nventories/index.html.
24 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
that the natural shoreline consists primarily of
marsh, accounting for approximately 90% of the
total shoreline. There are also areas of beach,
the most significant of which are located near
Fox Creek, around Gloucester Point, and on
lower Jenkins Neck around Sandy Point. Areas
of forested shoreline are also noted throughout
the County.
Map NENR-8 10 shows manmade shoreline
protection features identified as part of the
shoreline inventory. Bulkheads and riprap
revetments protect about 28 miles of shoreline
in the County. Map NR-11 shows shoreline
recreational structures, such as marinas,
boathouses, docks, and boat ramps. The highest
concentrations of altered shoreline features are
found around Gloucester Point and Sarah
Creek.
Adjacent Land Uses
Gloucester’s Shoreline Inventory Report shows
that the majority of the shoreline in the County
is either forested (44%) or scrub-shrub (29%).
Residential land uses account for the largest
remaining portion of shoreline (20%), with the
rest divided among grass, agriculture,
commercial uses, paved, and timbered areas
(VIMS, 2008).
Impacts of Land Development
Land uses adjacent to the shoreline, both
existing and proposed, are required by the
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act to be
considered in comprehensive planning studies.
This allows for the identification and analysis of
land and water use conflicts and water quality
issues. Activities on land and water regularly
impact the utilization and quality of water
resources. Potential impacts include increased
nutrients, sediment, and pesticides carried in
runoff and increased flows, which can cause
stream bank erosion. In developing areas such
as Gloucester County, local governments have
the opportunity to direct conflicting land and
water uses away from sensitive natural
resources through the comprehensive planning
process. Redevelopment efforts in waterfront
areas within Gloucester County may also utilize
higher densities and other techniques in
conjunction with preservation of open space to
help reduce impacts to the Chesapeake Bay.
Redevelopment
Runoff from developed areas carried from
impervious surfaces can potentially degrade
local water quality. Paved areas cannot absorb
rainwater and the resultant runoff can
transport nutrients, pollutants, and toxic
substances into local waterways. Some of the
older areas of the County were developed prior
to the enactment of environmental regulations
that require water quality protection measures
in their design. In this situation, redevelopment
provides the primary means of making
significant water quality improvements. During
redevelopment of these older areas, water
quality improvement measures such as
stormwater best management practices (BMPs)
and shoreline restoration activities can be
incorporated. Redevelopment activities must
also comply with impervious area limitations,
preserve existing vegetation, and may require
connection to existing sewer service. Several of
these existing developed sites are working
waterfronts and considered to be cultural
resources in Gloucester. Redevelopment of
these sites should be consistent with their
current use.
Potential Shoreline Development Sites
In Gloucester, most of the seafood processing
plants and marinas where boats are moored
have existed for decades and may be
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
25
candidates for redevelopment. Redevelopment
of older sites will also provide the opportunity
for implementation of greater water quality
protection measures. Some of the areas
between Gloucester Point and Achilles, such as
along Guinea Road (Route 216), Terrapin Cove
Road, Tidemill Road, and Yacht Club Road are
served by a Hampton Roads Sanitation District
sewer force main, and the opportunity exists for
marinas to connect for disposal of sanitary
sewer wastes.
Flood Prone Areas
Flood prone areas are those sites in the County
that are predictably subject to overflows from
nearby water bodies. Development in flood
prone areas is potentially both costly and
hazardous. Several factors can determine the
amount of damage caused by flooding, such as
rate of water rise, depth and duration of
flooding, geographic orientation of the
shoreline, topography of the land, and the
amount of threatened development.
Development in flood prone areas can worsen
flooding by increasing the amount of
impervious cover, which prevents the natural
infiltration and absorption of water into the
soil. Preserving floodplains can have many
benefits, including enhancing water quality,
allowing recharge of groundwater aquifers,
reducing flooding, providing fisheries and
wildlife habitat, providing recreational
opportunities, and protecting historic lands.10
Many flood prone areas in the County were
developed before they were identified as part
of a Special Flood Hazard Area and before the
creation of federal and state floodplain
protection programs. This historical
development limits the opportunity to realize
10
DCR-CBLA, 1989
the full benefits of floodplain preservation. The
County’s floodplain management efforts will
continue to focus on the identification,
reduction, and mitigation of flood hazards
within developed areas. There may also be
some opportunities for targeted restoration of
floodplains through buy-out and relocation
programs.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) identifies flood prone areas in
Gloucester County on a series of Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), which were most
recently revised by FEMA in September 2010.
As part of the revision FEMA also provided the
County the FIRM in digital format, which has
been incorporated into the County’s online
Geographic Information System (GIS).
Elevations range from 0-160 feet above mean
sea level, and approximately 27,000 acres of the
County are within the 100-year flood plain. All
new structures within these areas are required
to be built with their finished floors above the
100-year flood levels indicated on the maps.
Map NENR-9 12 illustrates the flood prone
areas as indicated on the FIRMs. According to
FEMA, Zone AE is the flood insurance rate zone
that corresponds to the 1-percent annual
chance floodplains. In most instances, Base
Flood Elevations are determined within this
zone and mandatory flood insurance purchase
requirements apply. Zone VE is the flood
insurance rate zone that corresponds to areas
within the 1-percent annual chance coastal
floodplain that have additional hazards
associated with storm waves. Mandatory flood
insurance purchase requirements also apply
here. Zone A indicates areas with a 1% annual
chance of flooding and a 26% chance of
flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage.
Because detailed analyses are not performed
26 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
for such areas; no depths or base flood
elevations are shown within these zones
(Source: FEMA). Areas shown as X-500 have a
moderate flood hazard, usually between the
limits of the 100-year and 500-year floods. All
other areas have a minimal flood risk.
Gloucester County is a FEMA Community Rating
System (CRS) member. Being a CRS member
means that the County is audited annually by
the Insurance Services Office (ISO) on how well
the floodplain regulations in the community are
administered and enforced. The CRS program is
designed to recognize and encourage
community floodplain management activities
that exceed the minimum National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) standards. In 2010,
Gloucester County earned “Class 7” status in
the CRS program. As a result, Gloucester
landowners who have flood insurance receive a
fifteen (15) percent discount on their annual
premiums.
Gloucester County has addressed the potential
hazards of development in flood prone areas
through the adoption and revision of a
Floodplain Management Ordinance, through
inclusion of floodplain protections in its
Subdivision Ordinance, and through
development of a Floodplain Management Plan
(FMP). The Floodplain Ordinance establishes
performance requirements for development
and redevelopment in floodplains. The
ordinance was revised on August 3, 2010 to
provide for increased flood protection
standards of structures in the Flood Prone areas
of the County. The Subdivision Ordinance
directs that land subject to flooding be set aside
for uses that would not be endangered by a
periodic or occasional inundation. Lastly,
County staff finalized a standalone floodplain
management plan for the County that analyzes
the causes of coastal flooding and identifies
vulnerabilities, evaluates existing coastal flood
management practices, and provides feasible
solutions to strengthen the County’s overall
coastal flood management system. Hazard
mitigation strategies for Gloucester County are
also addressed, and recommendations for
improving existing strategies are provided. The
plan incorporated input gained from citizens
during three public meetings and
communications with local, regional, state, and
federal agencies and organizations. A sixteen
(16) member planning committee made up of
County staff and citizens from flood prone areas
in Gloucester is charged with monitoring
implementation, reviewing progress, and
recommending revision to the plan in an annual
report. The plan must be updated at least once
every five years per the requirements of the
CRS program.
Dam Break Inundation Zones
Localities are required to study dam break
inundation zones and the potential impacts to
downstream properties and incorporate that
information into comprehensive plans. In
general, dams are regulated if they exceed a
certain height and capacity; exemptions are also
made for specific uses. The hazard potential of a
dam (low, significant, or high) is calculated
based on its structural integrity and the various
land uses that lie within its dam break
inundation zone. The Middle Peninsula Planning
District Commission covered dams and the
potential for dam failures as part of its Middle
Peninsula Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan,
completed in 2010. According to the Virginia
Department of Emergency Management, there
is one high hazard dam (Beaver Dam, with a
maximum storage capacity of 20,523 acre-feet)
in Gloucester County and one significant hazard
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
27
dam (Cow Creek Dam, with a maximum storage
capacity of 931 acre-feet). There are nine
additional dams that are not rated for their
hazard potential by DCR. Dam break inundation
zones for the two regulated dams in Gloucester
County are shown on Map NENR-1013.
Tidal and Non-Tidal Wetlands
Wetlands are defined in Chapter 13 of Title 28.2
of the Code of Virginia and are classified as non-
vegetated or vegetated wetlands. Non-
vegetated wetlands means non-vegetated lands
lying contiguous to mean low water and
between mean low water and mean high water,
including non-vegetated areas subject to
flooding by normal and wind tides, but not
hurricane or tropical storm tides. Vegetated
wetlands are defined as lands lying between
and contiguous to mean low water and an
elevation above mean low water equal to the
factor one and one-half times the mean tide
range with certain types of vegetation present.
They consist of mostly visible marshes and
swamps. The type and extent of wetlands in
Gloucester County are shown on Map NENR-
1014. Estuarine wetlands are tidal wetlands.
Lacustrine wetlands are wetlands formed
around interior bodies of water or dammed
rivers. Palustrine wetlands are non-tidal
wetlands. Riverine wetlands are those wetlands
found along rivers before they reach lakes or
salinity levels rise near oceans.
According to the Virginia Wetlands
Management Handbook (1996), there are five
major benefits of wetlands. First, wetlands are
important sites of food and energy production
for the marine ecosystem. Second, they provide
important waterfowl and fish and wildlife
habitat. Third, wetlands provide natural
protection from shoreline erosion. Fourth,
wetlands help to filter pollutants, such as
sediment and nutrients, from urban runoff,
minimizing impacts to local water quality.
Finally, wetlands help to reduce flooding
through their capacity to absorb large amounts
of water.
In 2008, the Virginia Institute of Marine Science
(VIMS) published a shoreline situation report
for Gloucester County that describes its tidal
wetlands. Of the more than 492 miles of
shoreline studied, 90% percent is comprised of
wetlands, including fringe, embayed, and
extensive marshes. The total marsh and
wetland acreage of Gloucester County ranks
fifth among political jurisdictions in the
Commonwealth, behind only the counties of
Accomack and Northampton and the cities of
Chesapeake and Virginia Beach. Gloucester
County's more than 12,000 acres of wetlands
are comprised of high and low marshes, creeks,
ponds, wooded areas, and tidal flats. At least
5,000 of these acres are marsh, 3,500 acres are
in creeks, 1,800 acres are comprised of tidal
flats, and nearly 600 acres are swamp land less
than five feet above sea level. Hammocks are
areas elevated above the surrounding marsh
and usually dominated by pines, cedars, and
wax myrtle. They comprise about 1,000 acres of
the County's wetlands and account for about 40
percent of the state's total hammock-type
physiography, more than in any other County.
Existing Wetlands Protection Policies
Gloucester County currently protects wetlands
through its Wetlands Zoning Ordinance. Under
the Ordinance, any proposal to develop any
vegetated or non-vegetated tidal wetland must
first apply for a permit from the local wetlands
board or the Virginia Marine Resources
Commission (VMRC). The Board works in
conjunction with VMRC and the U.S. Army
28 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
Corps of Engineers’ Section 404 permit program
in reviewing applications. In addition, tidal
wetlands are protected as Resource Protection
Area (RPA) features by the County’s
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance. This
ordinance provides protection by requiring a
buffer between development and the RPA
feature. Non-tidal wetlands and other areas not
included in the RPA are protected by
designating them as Resource Management
Areas. Some shoreline projects may include
impacts under both the Wetlands Ordinance
and the Chesapeake Bay Preservation
Ordinance and may require coordinated
reviews to address the requirements of both
programs. Map NENR-11 15 depicts the
approximate location of CBPA Resource
Protection Areas in Gloucester County.
In Virginia, tidal wetlands are also protected by
the 1972 Wetlands Protection Act, as amended.
The Act enabled the County to adopt its
Wetlands Ordinance. This law established the
joint permit process for construction, dredging,
or filling in a tidal wetland and serves as the
source of authority for actions taken on permits
by the Gloucester County Wetlands Board.
VMRC coordinates the joint permit with all
appropriate agencies for review. VMRC also
administers the Wetlands Protection Act and
reviews all decisions handed down by the
County board.
Non-tidal wetlands are currently regulated at
the federal level by Section 404 of the 1977
Clean Water Act, as amended, which prohibits
disposal of dredged or fill material into waters
of the United States and adjacent wetlands. A
permit from the Army Corps of Engineers is
required for non-tidal wetlands impacts. In
addition, the Virginia Nontidal Wetlands Act of
2000 governs activities affecting non-tidal
wetlands within the state and includes the
following provisions. The law:
• Requires permittees first to avoid, then
minimize and, if wetlands must be
destroyed, to replace their acreage and
function.
• Adopts the scientifically accepted definition
of wetlands currently used by the federal
government and the State Water Control
Board.
• Requires permits and mitigation from those
proposing to drain, dredge, excavate, ditch,
flood or impound, fill or discharge into non-
tidal wetlands.
• Requires the state to seek a Corps of
Engineers' State Programmatic General
Permit (SPGP) for most activities, thereby
streamlining the permitting process. This
SPGP has been issued. The Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
issues state permits based on this general
permit.
• Exempts normal agricultural and
silvicultural activities and homeowner
landscaping and maintenance.
• Requires general permits for a variety of
activities, including sand, coal and gas
mining activities, linear easements for
public utilities and transportation projects,
and activities affecting less than one-half
acre. These general permits are issued by
DEQ.
Green Infrastructure
As new residential and commercial
development take place in Gloucester County it
will be important to plan carefully for the
protection of rural character and environmental
resources that support a high quality of life for
the County’s citizens. Green infrastructure is a
systematic approach to conservation planning
that can address a broad range of community
needs. A green infrastructure approach can be
used to identify a network of lands that is
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
29
valuable for a variety of reasons including
natural resource protection, water quality
protection, recreation, and protection of
working lands and cultural resources. Green
infrastructure planning is also useful in
differentiating between areas that are suitable
for future development and those that are not.
The Hampton Roads Planning District
Commission (HRPDC) has completed a series of
reports identifying important environmental
areas in the region for inclusion in a regional
green infrastructure network. This network
extends from Gloucester County through the
Peninsula to the Southside and Western
Tidewater, and includes areas that provide
water quality and wildlife habitat benefits. The
most recent version of the Gloucester portion
of the regional green infrastructure network is
shown on Map NENR-1216. This network is
documented in a series of reports11
that
describe the methodologies used to identify the
network. It also contains an inventory of
resources such as parks and recreational areas.
The regional network will be a starting point for
the development of a more detailed network
for the County. This county network can be
used to connect the County’s rich natural
resources with additional cultural and historic
resources. It can also be used as a tool to plan
for connections between important County
assets. Even as the County grows and develops,
existing rural and cultural landscapes and scenic
views can be protected for residents and
tourists visiting recreational and historic sites
throughout the County.
11
HRPDC Green Infrastructure reports include A
Green Infrastructure Plan for Hampton Roads
(2010), Green Infrastructure in Hampton Roads
(2007), and The Hampton Roads Conservation
Corridor Study(2006).
The HRPDC regional green infrastructure
network identifies areas that are high value for
water quality, habitat protection, and both. In
Gloucester County, the 2010 green
infrastructure plan identified approximately 900
acres that were high value for water quality,
over 16,000 acres that were high value for
habitat protection, and nearly 26,000 acres that
were high value for both. This analysis can be
used to prioritize areas for conservation,
preservation, or outdoor recreational use. It can
also be used to design a network of active and
passive recreational areas that connect to
environmental resources, as well as cultural and
historic resources.
Major Issues
Soil Suitability for Septic Systems
As discussed earlier, the majority of the soils in
the southeastern part of Gloucester are
classified as at least partially hydric, meaning
that inundation occurs for periods of time that
are sufficient to create anaerobic conditions.
Hydric soils are also found along streams and
rivers throughout the County. Although not all
areas with hydric soils are classified as
wetlands, these areas generally have a high
water table and are susceptible to poor
drainage and flooding. They are unsuitable for
development or for conventional septic
systems.
Prior to environmental and land use regulation,
residential and commercial development
occurred in the southeastern half of the County
where the soils are poorly suited for residential
development. Wastewater disposal and
protecting groundwater quality are soil-related
problems that could be aggravated by unguided
30 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
future development. The Future Land Use Plan
identifies those areas of the county that are
unsuitable for septic system use or are
otherwise unfit for intensive residential,
commercial, or industrial development due to
physical constraints.
Shoreline Erosion and Erosion
Rates
Severely eroding shorelines are defined by the
Virginia Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance
Manual as eroding at a rate greater than 3 feet
per year. Although generally small in size, there
are several areas of high bank erosion noted in
Gloucester County. These include the Carmine
and Mumfort Islands in the York River, isolated
areas around Timberneck Creek, and much of
Mill Creek. Areas with high marsh erosion rates
are reported near Morris Bay, Monday Creek,
and along the Ware River in the vicinity of Page
Creek, Goat Point Creek, Four Point Marsh, and
Mud Point. However, areas of high erosion
account for only about 4% of the marshy
shoreline in the County and the remainder
appears to be generally stable.
A recommended hierarchy of possible shoreline
stabilization measures for low, moderate, and
severely eroding shorelines is provided below.
The following ranking, summarized in Table NR-
5, is consistent with the goals of the
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act and may help
to guide recommendations on applications for
installing new stabilization structures or
replacing existing structures. It is important to
note that although erosion control options are
ranked individually, often a combination of
erosion control methods is necessary. The
measures are listed by ranking, with #1 being
the most preferable option. In 2011, the
General Assembly adopted living shorelines as
the preferred shoreline stabilization measure as
opposed to shoreline hardening measures such
as bulkheads.
Where shoreline stabilization is necessary, a
unified area approach, rather than an individual
site-by-site approach, is recommended. When
such an approach is taken, individual costs can
be lessened and worsening erosion problems
for neighboring properties can be avoided. For
more information on erosion control options,
refer to Section V - Shoreline Erosion Control
and Access Policy Options of the HRPDC
Regional Shoreline Element of Comprehensive
Plans, Part I: Guidance Manual. An additional
source of information on shoreline erosion
control options that is useful for homeowners is
Shoreline Management in Chesapeake Bay
(Hardaway and Byrne, 1999). A series of in-
house studies titled Shoreline Erosion Control
Guidelines, by the Virginia Department of
Conservation and Recreation (1993), states that
maintenance and establishment of marsh
grasses should be considered as the first choice
for shoreline erosion control in low energy
areas with adequate site conditions.
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
31
Table NENR-X5: Hierarchy of Possible Shoreline Stabilization
Measures
Ranking Stabilization Measure
Areas with a Low Erosion Rate (<1 foot/year)
1 Vegetative stabilization with/without bank regrading (if applicable)
2 Revetments
3 Bulkheads
Areas with a Moderate Erosion Rate (1-3 feet/year)
1 Vegetative stabilization (depending on site-specific conditions)
2 Beach nourishment
3 Revetments
4 Breakwaters
5 Groins
6 Bulkheads (depending on site-specific conditions)
Areas with a Severe Erosion Rate (>3 feet/year)
1 Relocation
2 Beach nourishment
3 Revetments
4 Breakwaters
5 Groins
6 Seawall
Generally speaking, for enhancing water quality
and aquatic habitat, the Living Shorelines
approach using vegetative and non-structural
forms of erosion control is preferred over other
forms of shoreline stabilization. However, non-
structural forms of erosion control are not
always effective at shoreline stabilization as
wave energy increases and erosion becomes
more severe. Along shorelines with less than 0.5
nautical miles of fetch, marsh planting may be a
viable form of shoreline erosion control. Along
interior creeks where erosion is more severe,
marsh plantings may be protected by a
breakwater type of structure, such as a
submerged sill, to protect the marsh toe. This
approach has been shown to be successful
throughout the Chesapeake Bay.
Gloucester County Code, §7.5-10, allows the
County to designate erosion impact areas under
the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance.
Additionally, approval of a conservation plan for
any erosion impact area can be required and
made subject to all review, bonding, inspection,
and enforcement provisions that apply to
approved land-disturbing permits. The plan
must be submitted by the property owner.
Currently, the County has not determined a
need to designate any areas as erosion impact
areas. It appears that most of the areas with
erosion problems are areas that have already
been developed. Where new development is
considered, the County’s existing regulations
32 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
provide for protection of shorelines through
avoidance (buffers) and mitigation. In areas
where erosion affects already developed land,
erosion control is the responsibility of the
property owner.
Stormwater Management
Managing stormwater is an important local
government function in Virginia. Gloucester
County does not have a municipal stormwater
system along the lines of those in cities such as
Norfolk or Virginia Beach. Instead, it manages
stormwater primarily through regulations such
as the County’s Chesapeake Bay ordinance and
its Erosion and Sediment Control ordinance,
both of which are part of the County Code. This
type of stormwater management program
works best in mostly rural counties like
Gloucester. However, parts of Gloucester such
as Gloucester Point are growing. This may result
in Gloucester being required to manage its
stormwater through a dedicated treatment
program. The United States Environmental
Protection Agency is studying potential changes
to federal stormwater regulations for coastal
communities. This, along with the results of the
2010 U.S. Census, has the potential to redefine
Gloucester as a more urban or highly populated
locality, which would require additional
investment in stormwater infrastructure. The
Chesapeake Bay TMDL and recently-adopted
Virginia state stormwater regulations could also
result in changes to how the County will have to
manage its stormwater system.
Coastal Resources Management
Coastal ecosystems reside at the interface
between the land and water and are naturally
very complex. They perform a vast array of
functions, including shoreline stabilization,
water quality protection, flood protection, and
fish, wildlife, and plant habitat, all of which
provide direct and indirect benefits to coastal
communities like Gloucester County. Research
on coastal ecosystem resource management
has revealed that traditional resource
management practices limit the ability of the
coastal ecosystem to perform many of these
essential functions. The loss of these services
has already been noted throughout coastal
communities in Virginia as a result of
development in coastal areas coupled with
common erosion control practices. For
example, beaches and dunes are diminishing
due to a reduction in a natural sediment supply.
Also, wetlands are drowning in place due to the
combination of sea level rise and barriers to
inland migration resulting from the construction
of bulkheads and revetments. Continued
armoring of shorelines and development in
coastal areas threatens the long-term
sustainability of coastal ecosystems adapting to
sea level rise.
In response, the General Assembly has
designated “living shorelines” as the preferred
alternative for shoreline stabilization in
Virginia’s coastal areas. The term living
shoreline encompasses a full spectrum of
design options appropriate for various wave
energy settings and erosion problems; they
range from marsh plantings to the use of rock
sills in combination with beach nourishment.
These approaches combat shoreline erosion,
minimize impacts to the natural coastal
ecosystem, and reinforce the principal that an
integrated approach for managing tidal
shorelines enhances the probability that the
resources will be sustained. Therefore, local
governments should adopt the guidance and
practices recommended by VIMS to ensure that
functions performed by coastal ecosystems will
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
33
be preserved and the benefits derived by
humans from coastal ecosystems will be
maintained into the future. The guidance
developed by VIMS recommends:
- utilizing VIMS Decision Trees to review and
select appropriate erosion control and
shoreline management practices12
- adopting these shoreline best management
practices as the recommended approach
and requiring justification by applicants
seeking to use another approach
- training local staff on these decision-making
tools
- making local policies consistent with the
general permit being developed by VMRC
- educating citizens and stakeholders on the
benefits of living shorelines
- evaluating and considering a locality-wide
permit to promote living shorelines
- considering preserving available open
spaces adjacent to marshlands to allow for
inland retreat in response to sea level rise
- evaluating and considering cost share
opportunities for construction of living
shorelines
Sea Level Rise
The Hampton Roads region is highly vulnerable
to damages from storm surge and potential sea
level rise. Much of the region is relatively flat
and low-lying, which allows storms to push
ashore and flood large areas. While related,
vulnerability to these two hazards creates
different sets of risk for Gloucester County.
Storm surge vulnerability impacts the County
now. A significant part of the County lying east
of Route 17 lies in a Category 1, 2, 3, or 4 Storm
Surge Area, as shown in Table NENR-36. The
most vulnerable areas of the County are found
12
More information on the VIMS Decision Trees
is available on the website for the Center for
Coastal Resources Management at
http://ccrm.vims.edu/decisiontree/index.html
along Mobjack Bay and include Jenkins Neck,
Maryus, Severn, Achilles, Bena, Perrin, Robins
Neck, Glass, Dutton, Ware Neck, White Marsh
and portions of Gloucester Point. This is
illustrated on Map NR-1317.
Table NENR-36: Area Vulnerable to Storm Surge
in Gloucester County (Areas are cumulative)
STORM SURGE CATEGORY AREA (ACRES)
1 21,476
2 35,518
3 40,254
4 43,904
Source: Hampton Roads Planning District
Commission
Hurricanes and other storms can cause
significant damage to buildings. Tidal and surge
flooding is limited to coastal areas. In addition
to impacts on structures, these storms can have
significant impacts on the natural environment.
Storms can erode beaches and blow down trees
and other vegetation. Many of the most critical
environmental areas in Hampton Roads are
located in areas that could be affected by storm
surge. For example, an analysis by the Hampton
Roads Planning District Commission calculated
the amount of green infrastructure in the region
that is vulnerable to a Category 1 storm surge at
approximately 84,000 acres, or 16.5% of the
region’s entire green infrastructure network.
Sea level rise could potentially result in the
inundation or severe erosion of a significant
part of eastern Gloucester County, as shown on
Map NR-1417. Global sea level rise is the result
of melting ice, which adds to the amount of
water in the oceans, as well as the warming of
the oceans, which results in their thermal
expansion. At the local scale, sea level rise is a
combination of global sea level rise, local and
regional currents, and the vertical movement of
34 Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
land. Gloucester, like much of Hampton Roads
and eastern Virginia, is sinking, or subsiding,
due to several geological processes. The end
result is that the entire region is experiencing
significant local sea level rise. According to the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), the long-term trend of
sea level rise at the Gloucester Point/Yorktown
Tide Station is about 0.15 mminches/year, or
approximately 1.25 feet every 100 years.
However, climate change is projected to
increase the rate of global sea level rise, which
could result in much higher rates of sea level
rise experienced in Gloucester and across
Hampton Roads. Current projections of global
sea level rise by the end of the 21st
century
range from about half a meter to two meters,
according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.13
Surface Water Quality
Point Source Pollution
Point source pollution is a major source of
surface water quality issues. Point sources of
pollution include municipal and industrial
dischargers and individual waste treatment
systems. The Clean Water Act requires
wastewater dischargers to have a permit
establishing pollution limits and specifying
monitoring and reporting requirements.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permits regulate household and
industrial wastes that are collected in sewers
and treated at municipal wastewater treatment
plants. Permits also regulate industrial point
sources and concentrated animal feeding
operations that discharge into other
wastewater collection systems or that discharge
directly into receiving waters. The types of
13
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineering
Circular 1165-2-212, “Sea-Level Change
Considerations for Civil Works Programs”
pollutants regulated include conventional
pollutants (human wastes, food from sink
disposals, laundry and bath waters), toxic
pollutants (organics and metals), and
nonconventional pollutants, (such as nitrogen
and phosphorus), that may require regulation.
In Virginia, NPDES permits are administered by
the Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality (DEQ) and are identified as Virginia
Pollution Discharge Elimination System (VPDES)
Permits. According to data from DEQ, there are
four current holders of VPDES permits in
Gloucester County.
Thirteen Hampton Roads localities, including
Gloucester County, are currently under a
Special Order by Consent with the Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
concerning sanitary sewer overflows. The
Hampton Roads Sanitation District (HRSD) has
separately entered into a Consent Decree with
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA). This consent order is the result of the U.
S. EPA’s expanded enforcement priorities,
which target sanitary sewer systems serving
populations over 1 million. This Consent Order
requires local and regional wastewater utilities
to assess and test their conveyance systems for
failures and capacity related issues, making
necessary replacements and system
enhancements. The affected Hampton Roads
localities and HRSD are working together in this
compliance effort, which will result in a
Regional Wet Weather Management Plan that
will guide prioritization and investment in larger
scale projects.
The Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) contains
information about more than 650 toxic
chemicals that are being used, manufactured,
treated, transported or released into the
environment. Hazardous waste information is
Gloucester County
Comprehensive Plan 2013
35
contained in the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Information System (RCRIS), a
national program management and inventory
system about hazardous waste handlers. In
general, all entities that generate, transport,
treat, store, and dispose of hazardous wastes
are required to provide information about their
activities to state environmental agencies.
According to the EPA, there were no TRI permit
holders in Gloucester in 20102011, the latest
year for which data is available. EPA’s Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act Information
(RCRAInfo) database lists 46 48 RCRIS permit
holders in Gloucester as of October 2011June
2013. Both RCRAInfo and VPDES permit holders
are listed in Table NENR-67.
The release of hazardous materials at
designated hazardous material facilities on
major transportation routes within the County
poses potential threat to both surface water
and groundwater resources. Gloucester County
has established a Local Emergency Planning
Committee (LEPC) to address this threat. In
addition to the benefits to public safety, the
LEPC works to reduce the threat of surface
water and groundwater contamination through
quick response to transportation accidents and
release of hazardous materials.
Non-Point Source Pollution
Non-point sources, which have the most
significant impact on surface water quality in
Gloucester County, encompass all those inputs
to surface water that cannot be identified as
having originated from a distinct discharge
point. These include stormwater runoff from
agriculture, urban or forested land surfaces;
atmospheric inputs; solid waste disposal; land
application of sludge and wastewater; septic
tanks; dredging; development/construction
material spills and leaks; marinas, and
shipyards, as well as impacts from the natural
environment such as weathering of soils which
provides metals, acids, etc. These types of
pollution are not readily quantified, although a
relationship does exist with the amount of
precipitation. More precipitation produces
more runoff and thus a greater non-point
source impact. In Gloucester County,
agricultural runoff, residential septic system
discharges, stormwater runoff, or marina
discharges are generally linked to the
condemnation of shellfish grounds due to non-
point source pollution. Many of the same
sources affecting surface water quality impacts
also have the potential to impact groundwater
resources.
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia
Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Bashir M54 course work 2
Bashir M54 course work 2Bashir M54 course work 2
Bashir M54 course work 2Abubakar Bashir
 
Climate changes impact on coastal regions
Climate changes impact on coastal regionsClimate changes impact on coastal regions
Climate changes impact on coastal regionsMakeOil Green
 
Impacts of climate change
Impacts of climate changeImpacts of climate change
Impacts of climate changeHanif Mia
 
IRJET- Hydrogeochemistry and Environmental Implication of Periyar River S...
IRJET-  	  Hydrogeochemistry and Environmental Implication of Periyar River S...IRJET-  	  Hydrogeochemistry and Environmental Implication of Periyar River S...
IRJET- Hydrogeochemistry and Environmental Implication of Periyar River S...IRJET Journal
 
TWCA Annual Convention: Texas State Guard, Mike Thuss and Bill Callegari
TWCA Annual Convention: Texas State Guard, Mike Thuss and Bill CallegariTWCA Annual Convention: Texas State Guard, Mike Thuss and Bill Callegari
TWCA Annual Convention: Texas State Guard, Mike Thuss and Bill CallegariTWCA
 
EFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTS
EFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTSEFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTS
EFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTSGayathri P
 
DU_Presentation on Thesis _Flood Early Warning_Rev3_19 Mar 2015
DU_Presentation on Thesis _Flood Early Warning_Rev3_19 Mar 2015DU_Presentation on Thesis _Flood Early Warning_Rev3_19 Mar 2015
DU_Presentation on Thesis _Flood Early Warning_Rev3_19 Mar 2015Shafiqur Rahman
 
Institute of water and flood management (iwfm)
Institute of water and flood management (iwfm)Institute of water and flood management (iwfm)
Institute of water and flood management (iwfm)Ahad Rudro
 
Rccas presentation gm 11_14_13sm
Rccas presentation gm 11_14_13smRccas presentation gm 11_14_13sm
Rccas presentation gm 11_14_13smgreenbelt82
 
Eacc bangladesh
Eacc bangladeshEacc bangladesh
Eacc bangladeshwiriana
 
Sudan SUDAN: NAPA PROJECT PROFILE
Sudan SUDAN: NAPA PROJECT PROFILESudan SUDAN: NAPA PROJECT PROFILE
Sudan SUDAN: NAPA PROJECT PROFILEelodieperrat
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Mekong ARCC - Final workshop - Socio-Economic Study
Mekong ARCC - Final workshop - Socio-Economic StudyMekong ARCC - Final workshop - Socio-Economic Study
Mekong ARCC - Final workshop - Socio-Economic Study
 
Climate change and Coastal India
Climate change and Coastal IndiaClimate change and Coastal India
Climate change and Coastal India
 
Bashir M54 course work 2
Bashir M54 course work 2Bashir M54 course work 2
Bashir M54 course work 2
 
Climate changes impact on coastal regions
Climate changes impact on coastal regionsClimate changes impact on coastal regions
Climate changes impact on coastal regions
 
Wetlands_term_paper_2015
Wetlands_term_paper_2015Wetlands_term_paper_2015
Wetlands_term_paper_2015
 
Projected impacts of climate change on Arctic marine ecosystems: a summary of...
Projected impacts of climate change on Arctic marine ecosystems: a summary of...Projected impacts of climate change on Arctic marine ecosystems: a summary of...
Projected impacts of climate change on Arctic marine ecosystems: a summary of...
 
Impacts of climate change
Impacts of climate changeImpacts of climate change
Impacts of climate change
 
Challenge and Reconstruct Learning, Mekong Delta
Challenge and Reconstruct Learning, Mekong DeltaChallenge and Reconstruct Learning, Mekong Delta
Challenge and Reconstruct Learning, Mekong Delta
 
IRJET- Hydrogeochemistry and Environmental Implication of Periyar River S...
IRJET-  	  Hydrogeochemistry and Environmental Implication of Periyar River S...IRJET-  	  Hydrogeochemistry and Environmental Implication of Periyar River S...
IRJET- Hydrogeochemistry and Environmental Implication of Periyar River S...
 
TWCA Annual Convention: Texas State Guard, Mike Thuss and Bill Callegari
TWCA Annual Convention: Texas State Guard, Mike Thuss and Bill CallegariTWCA Annual Convention: Texas State Guard, Mike Thuss and Bill Callegari
TWCA Annual Convention: Texas State Guard, Mike Thuss and Bill Callegari
 
EFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTS
EFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTSEFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTS
EFFECTS OF GLOBAL WARMING ON THE COASTS
 
Impact of Climate Change on Coastal Ecosystems
Impact of Climate Change on Coastal EcosystemsImpact of Climate Change on Coastal Ecosystems
Impact of Climate Change on Coastal Ecosystems
 
USGS FishVis and FishTail: Decisions Support Mappers for Assessing Current an...
USGS FishVis and FishTail: Decisions Support Mappers for Assessing Current an...USGS FishVis and FishTail: Decisions Support Mappers for Assessing Current an...
USGS FishVis and FishTail: Decisions Support Mappers for Assessing Current an...
 
Protecting Forests for Fish: Using Conservation Easements to Protect the Wate...
Protecting Forests for Fish: Using Conservation Easements to Protect the Wate...Protecting Forests for Fish: Using Conservation Easements to Protect the Wate...
Protecting Forests for Fish: Using Conservation Easements to Protect the Wate...
 
Adapting Lake Fisheries via Cooperation: The Midwest Glacial Lakes Partnership
Adapting Lake Fisheries via Cooperation: The Midwest Glacial Lakes PartnershipAdapting Lake Fisheries via Cooperation: The Midwest Glacial Lakes Partnership
Adapting Lake Fisheries via Cooperation: The Midwest Glacial Lakes Partnership
 
DU_Presentation on Thesis _Flood Early Warning_Rev3_19 Mar 2015
DU_Presentation on Thesis _Flood Early Warning_Rev3_19 Mar 2015DU_Presentation on Thesis _Flood Early Warning_Rev3_19 Mar 2015
DU_Presentation on Thesis _Flood Early Warning_Rev3_19 Mar 2015
 
Institute of water and flood management (iwfm)
Institute of water and flood management (iwfm)Institute of water and flood management (iwfm)
Institute of water and flood management (iwfm)
 
Rccas presentation gm 11_14_13sm
Rccas presentation gm 11_14_13smRccas presentation gm 11_14_13sm
Rccas presentation gm 11_14_13sm
 
Eacc bangladesh
Eacc bangladeshEacc bangladesh
Eacc bangladesh
 
Sudan SUDAN: NAPA PROJECT PROFILE
Sudan SUDAN: NAPA PROJECT PROFILESudan SUDAN: NAPA PROJECT PROFILE
Sudan SUDAN: NAPA PROJECT PROFILE
 

Ähnlich wie Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia

Reasontorescind 130201005411-phpapp02
Reasontorescind 130201005411-phpapp02Reasontorescind 130201005411-phpapp02
Reasontorescind 130201005411-phpapp02Louisette Lanteigne
 
Environmental impact assessment
Environmental impact assessmentEnvironmental impact assessment
Environmental impact assessmentendw
 
Integrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and Policy
Integrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and PolicyIntegrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and Policy
Integrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and PolicyGeoEngineers, Inc.
 
Protection of coastal wetlands and Protection of coastal waters
Protection of coastal  wetlands and Protection of coastal  watersProtection of coastal  wetlands and Protection of coastal  waters
Protection of coastal wetlands and Protection of coastal watersAzad Uddin (Sojib Ahmed)
 
MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908
MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908
MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908DC Kuhns
 
Methods and technologies to improve efficiency of water use
Methods and technologies to improve efficiency of water useMethods and technologies to improve efficiency of water use
Methods and technologies to improve efficiency of water useDamion Lawrence
 
253370873 water-resource-management
253370873 water-resource-management253370873 water-resource-management
253370873 water-resource-managementRamil Artates
 

Ähnlich wie Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia (20)

Project environment
Project environmentProject environment
Project environment
 
Project environment
Project environmentProject environment
Project environment
 
Project environment
Project environmentProject environment
Project environment
 
Poster Presentations
Poster PresentationsPoster Presentations
Poster Presentations
 
Reason to rescind OMB decision
Reason to rescind OMB decisionReason to rescind OMB decision
Reason to rescind OMB decision
 
Reasontorescind 130201005411-phpapp02
Reasontorescind 130201005411-phpapp02Reasontorescind 130201005411-phpapp02
Reasontorescind 130201005411-phpapp02
 
Raceway
RacewayRaceway
Raceway
 
Environmental impact assessment
Environmental impact assessmentEnvironmental impact assessment
Environmental impact assessment
 
Lulc dynamics
Lulc dynamicsLulc dynamics
Lulc dynamics
 
Wetland degradation in Bangladesh
Wetland degradation in BangladeshWetland degradation in Bangladesh
Wetland degradation in Bangladesh
 
Integrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and Policy
Integrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and PolicyIntegrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and Policy
Integrated Water Resource Planning - Water, Forests, People and Policy
 
Protection of coastal wetlands and Protection of coastal waters
Protection of coastal  wetlands and Protection of coastal  watersProtection of coastal  wetlands and Protection of coastal  waters
Protection of coastal wetlands and Protection of coastal waters
 
Habitat glri 10
Habitat glri 10Habitat glri 10
Habitat glri 10
 
Project environment
Project environmentProject environment
Project environment
 
Project environment
Project environmentProject environment
Project environment
 
Session 7 Trans-boundary Perspective Volta
Session 7 Trans-boundary Perspective VoltaSession 7 Trans-boundary Perspective Volta
Session 7 Trans-boundary Perspective Volta
 
MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908
MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908
MM FARMER WHITE PAPER, 060908
 
Methods and technologies to improve efficiency of water use
Methods and technologies to improve efficiency of water useMethods and technologies to improve efficiency of water use
Methods and technologies to improve efficiency of water use
 
hydrology-03-00002
hydrology-03-00002hydrology-03-00002
hydrology-03-00002
 
253370873 water-resource-management
253370873 water-resource-management253370873 water-resource-management
253370873 water-resource-management
 

Mehr von Chuck Thompson

Virginia minute men militia
Virginia minute men militiaVirginia minute men militia
Virginia minute men militiaChuck Thompson
 
Constitutional Law Your Ironclad Guarantee of Freedom
Constitutional Law   Your Ironclad Guarantee of FreedomConstitutional Law   Your Ironclad Guarantee of Freedom
Constitutional Law Your Ironclad Guarantee of FreedomChuck Thompson
 
The American Judiciary
The American JudiciaryThe American Judiciary
The American JudiciaryChuck Thompson
 
Why climate change science does not matter
Why climate change science does not matterWhy climate change science does not matter
Why climate change science does not matterChuck Thompson
 
Constitutional Law And Meaning
Constitutional Law And MeaningConstitutional Law And Meaning
Constitutional Law And MeaningChuck Thompson
 
Judge Jeffery W Shaw Arrest Legal Filing
Judge Jeffery W Shaw Arrest Legal FilingJudge Jeffery W Shaw Arrest Legal Filing
Judge Jeffery W Shaw Arrest Legal FilingChuck Thompson
 
Business Tax Form, Gloucester, Virginia
Business Tax Form, Gloucester, VirginiaBusiness Tax Form, Gloucester, Virginia
Business Tax Form, Gloucester, VirginiaChuck Thompson
 
Circuit Court Judge Jeffrey W Shaw Lawsuit Update
Circuit Court Judge Jeffrey W Shaw Lawsuit UpdateCircuit Court Judge Jeffrey W Shaw Lawsuit Update
Circuit Court Judge Jeffrey W Shaw Lawsuit UpdateChuck Thompson
 
Internal revenue codes of 1879
Internal revenue codes of 1879Internal revenue codes of 1879
Internal revenue codes of 1879Chuck Thompson
 
Letter of Vice Admiral Lord Viscount Horatio Nelson
Letter of Vice Admiral Lord Viscount Horatio NelsonLetter of Vice Admiral Lord Viscount Horatio Nelson
Letter of Vice Admiral Lord Viscount Horatio NelsonChuck Thompson
 
Homeland Security Building Recommendations
Homeland Security Building RecommendationsHomeland Security Building Recommendations
Homeland Security Building RecommendationsChuck Thompson
 
The Battle of Gettysburg, 1863
The Battle of Gettysburg, 1863The Battle of Gettysburg, 1863
The Battle of Gettysburg, 1863Chuck Thompson
 
Les Miserables, five volumes, complete by victor hugo
Les Miserables, five volumes, complete by victor hugoLes Miserables, five volumes, complete by victor hugo
Les Miserables, five volumes, complete by victor hugoChuck Thompson
 
The Art of Making Whiskey
The Art of Making WhiskeyThe Art of Making Whiskey
The Art of Making WhiskeyChuck Thompson
 
The Practical Distiller
The Practical DistillerThe Practical Distiller
The Practical DistillerChuck Thompson
 

Mehr von Chuck Thompson (20)

Virginia minute men militia
Virginia minute men militiaVirginia minute men militia
Virginia minute men militia
 
Constitutional Law Your Ironclad Guarantee of Freedom
Constitutional Law   Your Ironclad Guarantee of FreedomConstitutional Law   Your Ironclad Guarantee of Freedom
Constitutional Law Your Ironclad Guarantee of Freedom
 
Rules For The Militia
Rules For The MilitiaRules For The Militia
Rules For The Militia
 
The American Judiciary
The American JudiciaryThe American Judiciary
The American Judiciary
 
Fake law fake courts
Fake law fake courts Fake law fake courts
Fake law fake courts
 
Why climate change science does not matter
Why climate change science does not matterWhy climate change science does not matter
Why climate change science does not matter
 
Constitutional Law And Meaning
Constitutional Law And MeaningConstitutional Law And Meaning
Constitutional Law And Meaning
 
Judge Jeffery W Shaw Arrest Legal Filing
Judge Jeffery W Shaw Arrest Legal FilingJudge Jeffery W Shaw Arrest Legal Filing
Judge Jeffery W Shaw Arrest Legal Filing
 
Business Tax Form, Gloucester, Virginia
Business Tax Form, Gloucester, VirginiaBusiness Tax Form, Gloucester, Virginia
Business Tax Form, Gloucester, Virginia
 
Circuit Court Judge Jeffrey W Shaw Lawsuit Update
Circuit Court Judge Jeffrey W Shaw Lawsuit UpdateCircuit Court Judge Jeffrey W Shaw Lawsuit Update
Circuit Court Judge Jeffrey W Shaw Lawsuit Update
 
Internal revenue codes of 1879
Internal revenue codes of 1879Internal revenue codes of 1879
Internal revenue codes of 1879
 
Buccaneers no. 22
Buccaneers no. 22Buccaneers no. 22
Buccaneers no. 22
 
Buccaneers no. 19
Buccaneers no. 19Buccaneers no. 19
Buccaneers no. 19
 
Letter of Vice Admiral Lord Viscount Horatio Nelson
Letter of Vice Admiral Lord Viscount Horatio NelsonLetter of Vice Admiral Lord Viscount Horatio Nelson
Letter of Vice Admiral Lord Viscount Horatio Nelson
 
Homeland Security Building Recommendations
Homeland Security Building RecommendationsHomeland Security Building Recommendations
Homeland Security Building Recommendations
 
The Battle of Gettysburg, 1863
The Battle of Gettysburg, 1863The Battle of Gettysburg, 1863
The Battle of Gettysburg, 1863
 
Daredevil 131
Daredevil 131Daredevil 131
Daredevil 131
 
Les Miserables, five volumes, complete by victor hugo
Les Miserables, five volumes, complete by victor hugoLes Miserables, five volumes, complete by victor hugo
Les Miserables, five volumes, complete by victor hugo
 
The Art of Making Whiskey
The Art of Making WhiskeyThe Art of Making Whiskey
The Art of Making Whiskey
 
The Practical Distiller
The Practical DistillerThe Practical Distiller
The Practical Distiller
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1DianaGray10
 
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )Brian Pichman
 
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UbiTrack UK
 
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdfNanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdfPedro Manuel
 
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)Commit University
 
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IES VE
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7DianaGray10
 
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™Adtran
 
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptxIntroduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptxMatsuo Lab
 
ADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE
ADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDEADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE
ADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDELiveplex
 
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXVoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXTarek Kalaji
 
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.YounusS2
 
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAAnypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAshyamraj55
 
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdfMachine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdfAijun Zhang
 
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioComparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioChristian Posta
 
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond OntologiesLinked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond OntologiesDavid Newbury
 
UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1
UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1
UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1DianaGray10
 
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online CollaborationCOMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaborationbruanjhuli
 
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and HazardsComputer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and HazardsSeth Reyes
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
 
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
Building Your Own AI Instance (TBLC AI )
 
201610817 - edge part1
201610817 - edge part1201610817 - edge part1
201610817 - edge part1
 
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
 
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdfNanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
 
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
 
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
 
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
 
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptxIntroduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
Introduction to Matsuo Laboratory (ENG).pptx
 
ADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE
ADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDEADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE
ADOPTING WEB 3 FOR YOUR BUSINESS: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE
 
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXVoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
 
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
Basic Building Blocks of Internet of Things.
 
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAAnypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
 
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdfMachine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
 
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioComparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
 
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond OntologiesLinked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
Linked Data in Production: Moving Beyond Ontologies
 
UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1
UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1
UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1
 
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online CollaborationCOMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
COMPUTER 10: Lesson 7 - File Storage and Online Collaboration
 
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and HazardsComputer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
 

Natural Resources 070213 Gloucester, Virginia

  • 1. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 1 NATURAL RESOURCES Gloucester County’s environment includes many natural resources, including woodlands, rivers, creeks, and wetlands. These assets, along with abundant farm land, have provided a means of livelihood and a high quality of life for county residents for more than 350 years. Watermen benefit from the extensive shoreline and proximity to the Chesapeake Bay, farmers profit from plentiful good quality soils, and everyone reaps the rewards of living in a place of broad rivers, forests, rural landscapes and waterfront vistas. Maintaining the resources that support this traditional way of life is a priority for Gloucester County and serves as a guiding principle in its growth management philosophy. The effects of population growth and land development impact the natural environment in many ways. These include, but are not limited to: • loss of plant and wildlife habitat; • contamination of groundwater; • saltwater intrusion arising from increased groundwater withdrawals; • degradation of surface water quality; • decrease in groundwater recharge and availability; • disruption of natural drainage systems; • air pollution; • increased solid wastes; and, • loss of the County’s visual quality. The impact of growth and development on the quality of Gloucester’s environment is an issue of public concern, but environmental deterioration is not an inevitable consequence of population growth. Patterns of development that are detrimental to natural resources can be identified and mitigated by encouraging growth in appropriate areas and by ensuring that new development is designed and constructed in an environmentally sensitive manner. Areas of Gloucester County that are more susceptible to environmental degradation should be identified and development directed away from them and guided to areas of the County where environmental impacts will be less severe. The County’s “contained growth” philosophy, together with countywide land use and zoning ordinances, provide the framework to manage the location and character of anticipated future growth in an environmentally sensitive manner. Legal Framework Localities are required by state laws and regulations to address environmental issues through their comprehensive plans. The same enabling legislation that allows and requires localities to create comprehensive plans specifies what information those plans should contain. Specifically, localities should designate areas for various uses such as agriculture, mineral resources, and flood plains.1 In addition, localities should designate areas in order to implement ground water protection measures and provide maps showing agricultural and forest areas. To ensure that comprehensive plans are based on sound data, localities are required to study a variety of conditions, including the use of land, the preservation of agricultural and forestal land, natural resources, ground and surface waters, geologic and environmental factors, drainage, 1 Code of Virginia § 15.2-2223
  • 2. 2 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 and flood control. Beginning in 2013, localities will also be required to include coastal resource management guidance currently being developed by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science.2 The Commonwealth also requires localities to address environmental issues via the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act and its associated regulations.3 The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act explicitly authorizes local governments to protect the quality of state waters through their police and zoning powers, and requires them to incorporate the protection of the quality of state waters into their comprehensive plans, zoning ordinance, and subdivision ordinances. The Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act is enforced by the Commonwealth through the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Designation and Management Regulations, which specify the steps local governments must take to be in compliance. Localities are required to develop a local program incorporating several elements, including: 1. a map delineating Chesapeake Bay Preservation Areas (CBPAs) 2. performance criteria applying to developments within those CBPAs 3. a comprehensive plan that incorporates the protection of CBPAs and of the quality of state waters 4. a zoning ordinance and a subdivision ordinance that incorporate measures to protect the quality of state waters in CBPAs and require compliance with state regulations 5. an erosion and sediment control ordinance or revision that requires compliance with state regulations, and 2 Code of Virginia § 15.2-2223.2 3 Code of Virginia § 10.1-21 6. a plan of development process that assures that development within CBPAs will protect the quality of state waters prior to the issuance of any building permits The regulations go into further detail for each program element. Comprehensive plans are required to incorporate data collection and analysis, policy discussions, maps, and measures to implement local and state water quality goals. Specific topics mentioned in the regulations for data collection and policy discussions are the location and extent of CBPAs, physical constraints to development, fisheries and other aquatic resources, shoreline and streambank erosion problems, land use, existing and potential water pollution sources, public and private waterfront access, the mitigation of development impacts on water quality, and the use of redevelopment to improve water quality. In response to concerns about water quality and the health of the Commonwealth’s coastal resources, the General Assembly passed legislation in 2011 that established “living shorelines” as the preferred alternative in Virginia for shoreline management in terms of erosion control and water quality protection. This legislation required the Virginia Marine Resources Commission (VMRC) to develop and implement a general permit that “authorizes and encourages the use of living shorelines as the preferred alternative for stabilizing tidal shorelines in the Commonwealth” and the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) to develop comprehensive coastal resource management guidance for local governments.4 Beginning in 2013, localities will be required to include this guidance in their comprehensive 4 Code of Virginia § 28.2-104.1
  • 3. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 3 plans and plan updates.5 Although VIMS has not developed specific guidance for Gloucester County, general guidance, tools, and best management practices have been completed; this information is included in a later section of this chapter. Existing Conditions and Trends Location and Climate Gloucester County occupies the southernmost part of Virginia’s Middle Peninsula, bounded by King and Queen, Middlesex, and Mathews Counties, and by the York River, Piankatank River, and the Chesapeake Bay. Gloucester County encompasses a total land area of 225 square miles and is characterized primarily by flat terrain with a few areas of steep slopes (defined as over a 15 percent grade) in the northern and western areas of the County. Gloucester’s climate is influenced by its proximity to the Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean, generally resulting in mild winters and warm, humid summers. National Weather Service (NWS) monitoring stations are located nearby in Mathews County and in the Town of West Point in King William County. Data from both stations indicates that the average annual temperature in the Gloucester area is 57°F to 59°F. January is normally the coldest month, while July is the hottest. The average annual rainfall is about 45 inches and is well distributed throughout the year. According to the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), the most frequently reported weather events in the County are thunderstorms, severe lightning, high winds, and flash flooding. In 5 Code of Virginia § 15.2-2223.2 addition to summer thunderstorms, major producers of rainfall in Gloucester include northeasters and tropical storms. Hurricanes occasionally bring heavy rain, high winds, and tidal flooding. The most significant weather events in recent years include Hurricane Isabel, which struck on September 18, 2003 and an April 2011 tornado. Flooding from the storm surge of Hurricane Isabel caused extensive property damage in the region and many trees were uprooted. The April 2011 tornado destroyed homes, cost lives, and rendered Page Middle School unsuitable for use. Storms like the November Nor’easter of 2009 also caused flooding in the County. Increased flooding from “typical” weather events has been noted over the last decade, with less severe storms causing flooding in portions of the County. Soils A current survey of Gloucester soils is available from the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.6 Map NE-1 shows soil types in the County, according to the NRCS. The soils of Gloucester County are formed from unconsolidated marine sediments and vary from east to west. Most of the area west of a line running from Hayes north to Dutton contains generally deep, well-drained permeable soils, although it also contains some sandy ravines. The majority of agricultural land and forests are located in this part of the County. To the east of this line, the County is characterized by lower elevation and a high percentage of soils with wetness problems. These soils also have a high clay content that 6 This data can be viewed online through the NRCS Web Soil Survey Tool at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePa ge.htm
  • 4. 4 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 restricts the movement of water and limits its utility for a variety of land uses. Soils are classified using a taxonomy developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, which has six levels: orders, suborders, great groups, subgroups, families, and series. Gloucester County's numerous soil types fall under five different soil orders: histosols, ultisols, alfisols, inceptisols, and entisols. Histosols are composed mainly of decomposed organic matter, such as that found in wetlands or bogs. Ultisols are forest soils that have lost much of their minerals which can support agriculture. Alfisols are also forest soils, but have retained more of their mineral nutrients so are favorable for agriculture. Inceptisols are relatively undeveloped soils. Entisols are the most undeveloped, consisting of unconsolidated material.7 Specific soil types, as cataloged by the NRCS, are described in Table NENR-1 and shown on Map NENR-1. 7 http://soils.cals.uidaho.edu/soilorders/index.htm
  • 5. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 5 Table NENR-1: Soil Types SOIL NAME ORDER DESCRIPTION Alaga Entisols The Alaga series consists of very deep, excessively drained, rapidly permeable soils on uplands and non-flooding stream and marine terraces of the Coastal Plain. These soils consist of loamy sand. They formed in sandy marine or fluvial sediments. Caroline Ultisols The Caroline series consists of very deep, well drained soils of moderately slow or slow permeability on marine terraces of the Coastal Plain. These soils consist of loam, clay, and sandy clay loam. They formed in clayey fluvial and marine sediments. Craven Ultisols The Craven series consists of very deep, moderately well drained soils of slow permeability found on marine terraces and uplands of the Coastal Plain. These soils consist of silt loam, clay, and sandy clay loam. They formed in marine deposits. Dogue Ultisols The Dogue series consists of very deep, moderately well drained soils of moderately slow permeability found on stream terraces of the Coastal Plain. These soils consist of fine sandy loam, clay loam, and sandy loam. They formed from marine deposits. Emporia Ultisols The Emporia series consists of very deep, well drained soils of moderately slow to slow permeability found on marine terraces and uplands of the Coastal Plain. These soils consist of sandy loam, clay loam, and sandy clay loam. They formed from marine deposits. Eunola Ultisols The Eunola series consists of very deep, moderately well drained, moderately permeable soils that formed in fluvial or marine sediments. These soils consist of fine sandy loam and sandy clay loam. They are on low stream or marine terraces of the Coastal Plain. Fluvaquents Entisols Fluvaquents are found on flood plains on the Coastal Plain. They are very deep, poorly drained, and moderately permeable. These soils consist of loam, sandy clay loam, and gravelly sand. They formed from alluvium. Fluvaquents, saline Entisols Fluvaquents are found on flood plains on the Coastal Plain. They are very deep, poorly drained, and moderately permeable. These soils consist of very fine and fine sandy loam. They formed from alluvium. Hapludults Ultisols Hapludults are found on marine terraces of the Coastal Plain. They are very deep, moderately well drained, and of moderately slow permeability. These soils consist of fine sandy loam and sandy loam. They formed from marine deposits. Haplaquepts Inceptisols Haplaquepts are found on flats of the Coastal Plain. They are very deep, somewhat poorly drained soils of moderately rapid permeability. These soils consist of loam, sandy loam, and loamy sand. They formed from marine deposits.
  • 6. 6 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 SOIL NAME ORDER DESCRIPTION Johns Ultisols The Johns series consists of very deep, moderately well drained soils of moderate permeability. They are found on stream terraces of the Middle or Upper Coastal Plain or river valleys. These soils consist of sandy loam, sandy clay loam, and loamy sand. They formed from alluvium or fluviomarine deposits. Kalmia Ultisols The Kalmia series consists of very deep, well drained soils of moderate permeability. They are found on stream terraces on the Coastal Plain and river valleys. These soils consist of sandy loam, sandy clay loam, and loamy sand. They formed from marine deposits. Kempsville Ultisols Soils of the Kempsville series are very deep, well drained, and moderately permeable. These soils consist of fine sandy loam, sandy clay loam, and stratified sandy loam. They formed in loamy sediments on the upper Coastal Plain. Kenansville Ultisols The Kenansville series consists of very deep, well drained, soils of moderately rapid permeability found on Coastal Plain uplands and stream terraces. These soils consist of loamy fine sand, sandy loam, and loamy sand. They have formed in marine and fluvial sediments. Lumbee Ultisols The Lumbee series consists of very deep, poorly drained soils of moderate permeability found on stream terraces and flats on the Coastal Plain and river valleys. These soils consist of sandy loam, sandy clay loam, and sand. They formed from marine deposits. Meggett Alfisols The Meggett series consists of very deep, poorly drained soils of slow permeability found on marine terraces on the Coastal Plain. These soils consist of sandy loam, sandy clay, and very gravelly sandy loam. They formed from marine deposits. Ochlockonee Entisols The Ochlockonee series consists of very deep, well drained soils of moderately rapid permeability that formed from marine deposits. These soils consist of sandy loam, stratified loamy sand, and stratified sandy clay loam. Ochraquults Ultisols Ochraquults are found on flats of the Coastal Plain. They are very deep, poorly drained soils of moderate permeability. These soils consist of fine sandy loam and loam. They formed from marine deposits. Okeetee Alfisols The Okeetee series consists of very deep, somewhat poorly drained soils of very slow to slow permeability found on marine terraces and stream terraces on coastal plains and river valleys. These soils consist of sandy loam and sandy clay. They formed from marine deposits. Osier Entisols The Osier series consists of very deep, poorly drained, rapidly permeable soils found on flood plains or low stream terraces of coastal plains. These soils consist of loamy fine sand. They formed from marine deposits. Pactolus Entisols The Pactolus series consists of very deep, moderately well drained soils of rapid permeability found on marine terraces of coastal plains. These soils consist of loamy sand. They formed from marine deposits.
  • 7. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 7 SOIL NAME ORDER DESCRIPTION Pamlico Histosols The Pamlico series consists of very deep, very poorly drained soils of moderate to moderately rapid permeability found on depressions on coastal plains. These soils consist of muck and sand. They formed from organic material. Portsmouth Ultisols The Portsmouth series consists of very deep, very poorly drained soils of moderate permeability found on depressions on coastal plains. These soils consist of loam, silt loam, and stratified loamy sand. They formed from marine deposits. Psamments Entisols Psamments are found on marine terraces on coastal plains. They are very deep, moderately well drained soils of rapid permeability. These soils consist of fine sand and sand. They formed from marine deposits. Rumford Ultisols The Rumford series consists of very deep, well drained soils of moderately rapid permeability found on marine terraces on coastal plains. These soils consist of loamy fine sand, fine sandy loam, and stratified fine sand. They formed from marine deposits. Suffolk Ultisols The Suffolk series consists of very deep, well drained soils of moderate permeability found on marine terraces on coastal plains. These soils consist of fine sandy loam, sandy clay loam, and loamy sand. They formed from marine deposits. Sulfaquents Entisols Sulfaquents are found on salt marshes on coastal plains. They are very deep, very poorly drained soils of very slow to slow permeability. These soils consist of mucky silty clay loam and mucky silty clay. Wrightsboro Ultisols The Wrightsboro series consists of very deep, moderately well drained soils of moderate permeability found on stream terraces on coastal plains. These soils consist of fine sandy loam and sandy clay loam. They formed from marine deposits. Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S Department of Agriculture Soils are evaluated for their suitability for common uses, primarily agriculture and conventional septic systems. Typically, soils best suited for agriculture are also the soils best suited for conventional septic tank use. Farmland classification of soils is shown on Map NENR-2. Highly permeable soils are unsuitable for conventional septic drain fields and are shown on Map NENR-3. These classifications help identify which areas are more suitable for development. Map NENR-4 shows that the majority of the soils in the southeastern part of Gloucester are classified as hydric, meaning that inundation occurs for periods of time that are sufficient to create anaerobic conditions. Hydric soils are also found along streams and rivers throughout the County. Although not all areas with hydric soils are classified as wetlands, these areas generally have a high water table and are susceptible to poor drainage and flooding. They are unsuitable for development or for traditional septic systems.
  • 8. 8 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 Prior to the implementation of environmental and land use regulations in the County, residential and commercial uses developed in the southeastern half of the County where the soils are poorly suited for residential development. Wastewater disposal and protecting groundwater quality are soil-related problems that could be aggravated by unguided future development. The previous Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan generally coordinated the proposed Bayside District and Resource Conservation District, which shows large areas of soils unsuitable for traditional septic system use or otherwise unsuitable for high density or commercial development due to physical constraints. The issues of water quality and groundwater protection are discussed in greater detail later in the chapter. Slopes Most of the County is relatively flat. Areas with slopes greater than 15% are generally not considered appropriate for building structures. However Gloucester County does not have any prohibition against building on steep slopes. In Gloucester County, most of the areas with high slopes are along streams and other water bodies. These are shown on Map NENR-5. Prime Farmland Agriculture is an important part of Gloucester County’s history and economy. Identifying areas that are well suited for farming is an important step in preserving those areas for agricultural uses. The NRCS identifies areas that are appropriate for farming through its soil surveys. Gloucester County possesses over 53,000 acres of prime farmland, over 22,000 acres of land that would be considered prime farmland if properly drained, and over 7,500 acres of farmland that is of statewide importance. The NRCS classifies farmland based on its potential agricultural productivity. Prime farmland is considered the best for agricultural use in terms of climate, location, physical and chemical properties, available water supply, permeability, and erosion potential. Farmland of statewide importance is land that is not quite as good as prime farmland for agricultural uses or that requires additional treatment to produce high agricultural yields. The precise definition of farmland of statewide importance varies by state, while prime farmland meets a national standard. The County’s prime farmland is shown on Map NENR-2. When considering areas of the County for future land use, it is important to identify the prime soils so that the areas identified on the future land use plan for agriculture and forestry coincide with these prime soils. Watersheds and Drainage A watershed is an area of land from which all water, sediments, nutrients, and other dissolved materials drain into a common outlet. When precipitation occurs, water runs to the lowest point, usually a stream, river, or lake and eventually the ocean. Gloucester County lies entirely within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, which includes parts of six states (Delaware, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia) and the District of Columbia. These watersheds, or drainage units, cover Gloucester County's entire land surface and eventually contribute to the major rivers. Everything that happens to a watershed can affect what ends up in the water.
  • 9. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 9 Table NENR-2: Gloucester County Streams STREAM NAME DRAINAGE AREA (SQ. MILES) LENGTH (MILES) ELEVATION AT SOURCE (FEET) ELEVATION AT MOUTH (FEET) MOUTH IN COUNTY Sandy Creek 0.94 2.0 42 0 Gloucester Jones Creek 4.37 3.9 93 0 Gloucester Aberdeen Creek 3.26 3.4 84 0 Gloucester Carter Creek 8.51 6.4 90 0 Gloucester Cedarbush Creek 2.57 3.7 61 0 Gloucester Timberneck Creek 3.83 4.1 62 0 Gloucester Sarah Creek 5.22 0.3 0 0 Gloucester Northwest Branch 2.96 2.5 11 0 Gloucester Northeast Branch 2.16 2.3 7 0 Gloucester Poropotank River 39.19 15.6 123 0 King & Queen, Gloucester Unnamed Stream 2.44 3.3 135 0 King & Queen, Gloucester Woods Mill Swamp 4.92 4.6 131 0 King & Queen, Gloucester Poplar Spring Branch 6.26 4.6 107 0 King & Queen, Gloucester Adams Creek 2.87 4.5 100 0 Gloucester Purtan Creek 1.47 2.9 101 0 Gloucester Leigh Creek 1.40 2.2 100 0 Gloucester Bland Creek 5.74 4.7 102 0 Gloucester Fox Creek 2.92 1.7 52 0 Gloucester Source: Gloucester County Thus, effective flood control, conservation of fresh water, enhancement of water quality, and control of soil erosion and sedimentation make land use practices throughout the watershed almost as important as those located directly on the shorelines. The land area occupied by Gloucester County is drained by the York, Piankatank, North, Ware, and Severn rivers and their tributaries. Major stream segments in the County that drain watersheds to the County's creeks and rivers are identified in Table NENR-12. The County’s subwatersheds (Hydrologic Unit Code 12), as cataloged by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), are shown on Map NENR-6. Sources of Potable Water and Water Use Present water use is a product of local geography, water needs, transportation patterns and requirements, social and economic forces, and development patterns. Water
  • 10. 10 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 resources are critical to the physical and economic health of the community as well as the natural environment. Many practices have the potential to severely degrade the water quality and quantity. Many of these practices and threats were cataloged through the Hampton Roads Source Water Assessment Program. This program resulted in a Regional Source Water Assessment for the region’s surface water sources, which documented land uses and threats within critical areas related to surface water supplies.8 Gloucester County began delivering water services from the Beaverdam Reservoir and associated water treatment plant in July 1990. The Beaverdam Reservoir is located north of the Gloucester Court House area and is surrounded primarily by low density zoning with two to five acre minimum lot sizes. The County owns an approximately 300-foot to 600-foot wide buffer surrounding the reservoir, which makes up Beaverdam Park. The Park is used for passive recreational activities such as fishing, boating, nature study, picnics, hiking, bicycling, and horseback riding. Water quality is monitored weekly through algae counts. A survey is conducted every three years to evaluate development around the reservoir. Other than the various County ordinances affecting land use and development, there are no special requirements or overlay district around the reservoir to prevent or manage pollution of the surface water. The existing buffer area and low density zoning have been sufficient thus far to protect water quality. The 8 CH2M Hill. Regional Source Water Assessment. Prepared for the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission Directors of Utilities Committee and Hampton Roads Source Water Assessment Program Subcommittee. July 2001 County should consider additional requirements if deemed necessary as a result of routine water quality monitoring. Increasing regulations with regard to surface water protection will require the County to adopt more protective measures should the development around the reservoir continue. The County also has two wells. More information regarding the county water supply is found in the Community Facilities section of this plan. Regional Water Supply Planning In 2007, sixteen cities and counties and eight towns signed a Memorandum of Agreement to develop a Regional Water Supply Plan for Hampton Roads. In July 2011, the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission accepted the plan and authorized its distribution to local governments for adoption. The regional plan enables the localities to meet the water supply planning requirements of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 9 VAC 25-780. The purposes of this regulation are to (1) ensure that adequate and safe drinking water is available to all citizens of the Commonwealth, (2) encourage, promote, and protect all other beneficial uses of the Commonwealth’s water resources, and (3) encourage, promote, and develop incentives for alternative water sources. The regional plan covers the existing water supply, future water needs and alternatives, and water demand management information and drought response plans. In accordance with the Code of Virginia as well as the State Water Control Board implementation regulations a regional water supply plan was prepared by staff of HRPDC. This Plan was prepared for the Cities of Chesapeake, Franklin, Hampton, Newport News, Norfolk, Poquoson, Portsmouth, Suffolk,
  • 11. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 11 Virginia Beach, and Williamsburg and the Counties of Gloucester, Isle of Wight, James City, Southampton, Surry, and York as well as the Towns of Boykins, Branchville, Capron, Claremont, Courtland, Dendron, Ivor, Newsoms, Smithfield, Surry, and Windsor. The plan was adopted by the Gloucester County Board of Supervisors in August of 2011. As of November 2011, all of the localities had adopted the plan, which was then submitted to DEQ. The Plan includes elements describing existing water use, assessment of projected water demand, statement of need, alternatives analysis, descriptions of water management and drought response actions. In the Plan Gloucester is classified as part of the Peninsula sub-region. Groundwater Framework Gloucester County is located within the Virginia Coastal Plain Physiographic Province, which extends from the Fall Line in the west to the Atlantic Ocean in the east, and from the Maryland border in the north to the North Carolina border in the south. The surface of the Virginia Coastal Plain consists of a series of broad, gently sloping, highly dissected north- south trending terraces bounded by seaward facing, ocean cut escarpments. The subsurface is characterized by wedge-shaped unconsolidated sedimentary deposits that slope and thicken towards the east. The thickness of this wedge ranges from 0 feet at the western edge to over 6,000 feet along the Atlantic coast (McFarland and Bruce, 2006). These deposits consist of clay, silt, sand, and gravel, with variable amounts of shell material. These sediments overlay a bedrock basement of igneous and metamorphic rocks that also slopes gently to the east. Many different depositional environments existed during the formation of the Virginia Coastal Plain deposits. In general, the stratigraphic section (vertical profile) consists of a thick sequence of non-marine (riverine and alluvial) sedimentary deposits overlain by a thinner sequence of marine (near shore beach, estuarine, and delta) sedimentary deposits. Beneath Gloucester there are also breccia type sedimentary deposits associated with the Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater (see Map NR-7). The groundwater flow system in the Coastal Plain of Virginia is a multi-aquifer system. The most recent study of the hydrogeologic framework was completed by USGS in 2006 (McFarland and Bruce, 2006). Based on the framework, there are eight water bearing hydrogeologic units (aquifers) and eleven less permeable units that restrict groundwater flow (confining zones and confining units). The aquifers and confining units are stacked on top of each other and often alternate. Because of this configuration, flow in the aquifers primarily is lateral instead of vertical. The flow moves eastward and toward large withdrawal centers and major discharge areas near large rivers and the Atlantic coast. However, the flow pattern is disrupted by the Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater, which was formed over 35 million years ago when an asteroid or comet landed near the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay and created a crater over 50 miles in diameter. The impact of the asteroid or comet obliterated the deepest aquifers. A mixture of materials rushed into the crater and created a layer of sediments (breccia) unique from the non-marine sediments present before the impact. As illustrated in Figure NE-1, the groundwater system beneath Gloucester County is comprised of five aquifers and five confining units. The
  • 12. 12 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 Columbia aquifer, also referred to as the surficial aquifer, is the water table aquifer throughout most of Gloucester. In some areas, the Columbia aquifer and confining unit below it have been incised by the bay so the Yorktown-Eastover aquifer is the water table aquifer. In other parts of the county, the Yorktown-Eastover aquifer is a confined aquifer, covered by the Yorktown-Eastover confining unit. The Piney Point aquifer, Aquia aquifer, and the Potomac aquifer are all deeper confined aquifers underlying Gloucester. The confined aquifers are separated from aquifers above and below by confining beds. The northwest portion of the Chesapeake Bay Impact Crater covers the southern third of Gloucester. The Aquia and Potomac aquifers existed before the crater impact so both aquifers were obliterated in the southern portion of Gloucester. They were replaced by the breccia formed by the impact. The breccia has a low conductivity and contains stagnant saltwater in its pore spaces. The regional groundwater flow appears to diverge and flow around the crater rim. The Piney Point aquifer was deposited after the crater impact and is present across the entire county. The following paragraphs provide a general description of the aquifers identified in Gloucester from youngest to oldest (top to bottom). Columbia Aquifer The Columbia aquifer is the uppermost aquifer and is unconfined throughout its extent. It consists of sand and gravel. The Columbia aquifer is used primarily for domestic water supplies (drinking water and irrigation). Because it is shallow and easily accessible, it has historically been an important water source. However, it is susceptible to drought and contamination and is less reliable than confined aquifers. In favorable conditions, wells may yield 10 gallons per minute or more (McFarland and Bruce, 2006). Yorktown-Eastover Aquifer The Yorktown-Eastover aquifer is composed of sand with some interbedded silt. The Yorktown- Eastover aquifer is separated from the Columbia aquifer by the Yorktown confining zone. The confining zone leaks more than a confining unit and in some areas the Yorktown confining zone may function as an aquifer. In cross section, the Yorktown-Eastover aquifer is wedge-shaped, sloping, and thickening to the east. In Gloucester, the top of the aquifer is roughly 50 to 75ft below ground surface. Numerous wells withdraw water from the Yorktown-Eastover aquifer and it typically yields high-quality water. Wells commonly produce 10 to 30 gallons per minute. Piney Point Aquifer The Piney Point aquifer is a homogenous, sandy aquifer. It extends over the entire county including the impact crater. In Gloucester, the top of the Piney Point aquifer is approximately 250 to 400ft below ground surface and wells commonly yield 10 to 50 gallons per minute (McFarland and Bruce, 2006). The Piney Point aquifer includes two formations. The upper formation is rarely used for water supplies because of low yields and the prevalence of hydrogen sulfide. The lower formation is a more effective water producing zone. However, the Piney Point aquifer as a whole is not used across the crater where sediments contain brackish water.
  • 13. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 Figure NE-1: Hydrogeology of the Coastal Plain of Virginia Source: The Virginia Coastal Plain Hydrologic Framework Aquia Aquifer The Aquia aquifer only exists in the northwest portion of Gloucester. It is composed of medium to coarse sands. It is less than 50ft thick and is approximately 400ft below ground surface. Wells in the Aquia aquifer may yield as little as 5 gallons per minute or as much as 50 gallons per minute. Typically, the glauconitic sands found in the Aquia aquifer eventually weather and clog well screens and produce poor water quality. Also, it is very likely that in Gloucester the Aquia aquifer contains brackish water (McFarland and Bruce, 2006). Potomac Aquifer The Potomac aquifer is the deepest and thickest aquifer in Virginia’s Coastal Plain. The aquifer is composed of sand and gravel with many large clay interbeds. In previous studies, the Potomac aquifer was defined as three aquifers. the most recent hydrogeologic stud that it is hydraulically continuous on a regional scale and the clay interbeds affect flow on a 1: Hydrogeology of the Coastal Plain of Virginia Source: The Virginia Coastal Plain Hydrologic Framework The Aquia aquifer only exists in the northwest It is composed of It is less than 50ft thick and is approximately 400ft below ground Wells in the Aquia aquifer may yield as little as 5 gallons per minute or as much as 50 Typically, the glauconitic sands found in the Aquia aquifer eventually weather and clog well screens and produce Also, it is very likely that in Gloucester the Aquia aquifer contains brackish water (McFarland and Bruce, 2006). is the deepest and thickest aquifer in Virginia’s Coastal Plain. The aquifer is composed of sand and gravel with many large In previous studies, the Potomac aquifer was defined as three aquifers. However, the most recent hydrogeologic study indicated that it is hydraulically continuous on a regional scale and the clay interbeds affect flow on a localized scale. In Gloucester, the top of the aquifer is roughly 500ft below ground surface in the western part of the county and dips to over 1000ft below ground surface in the eastern part of the county. The Potomac aquifer is the most heavily used groundwater resource in the Virginia Coastal Plain. In 2005, about 90 percent of the reported annual withdrawals were from the Potomac aquifer. Major wa completed in the central and southeastern parts of the Coastal Plain have yielded 100 to 500 gallons per minute (McFarland and Bruce, 2006). However, the water is generally brackish and desalination is required to make it suitable for domestic or industrial use. Groundwater Recharge and Discharge Areas Groundwater flow in unconfined aquifers tends to reflect surface water flow. Groundwater flows from areas of relatively high elevation to adjacent areas of relatively low elevation. 13 In Gloucester, the top of the aquifer is roughly 500ft below ground surface in the western part of the county and dips to over ft below ground surface in the eastern part The Potomac aquifer is the most heavily used groundwater resource in the In 2005, about 90 percent of the reported annual withdrawals were from Major water supply wells completed in the central and southeastern parts of the Coastal Plain have yielded 100 to 500 gallons per minute (McFarland and Bruce, However, the water is generally brackish and desalination is required to make it suitable stic or industrial use. Groundwater Recharge and Groundwater flow in unconfined aquifers tends to reflect surface water flow. Groundwater flows from areas of relatively high elevation to adjacent areas of relatively low elevation.
  • 14. 14 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 Groundwater recharge can occur across almost any upland surface. Land surfaces with steep slopes are less effective groundwater recharge areas than broad and relatively flat grassy uplands. Groundwater recharge occurs when rainwater that percolates into the ground enters the unconfined (water table) aquifer. Research also suggests that in some areas of the Coastal Plain groundwater recharge occurs between aquifers (Meng, A.A. III, and Harsh, J.F., 1988). This occurs when the hydraulic pressure of groundwater in one aquifer forces water through a leaky confining unit into an adjacent aquifer. This movement can be either up or down based on the hydraulic properties of the aquifers. The location and magnitude of recharge between the aquifers, however, has not been well documented. Groundwater discharge areas are located in low-lying areas and are characterized by rivers, springs, and wetlands. Discharge areas for the confined aquifers may occur off the coast beneath the Atlantic Ocean or beneath the Chesapeake Bay. Air Quality As a requirement of the Clean Air Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maintains National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for certain criteria pollutants including ozone, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter (40 CFR 50). These standards are implemented in Virginia by the state Department of Environmental Quality and are designed to protect the public health and to prevent harm to the environment. When a geographic area meets these standards, the area is known as an attainment area, however if an area fails to meet these standards, then the EPA designates the area as nonattainment. A designated nonattainment area must develop a plan to bring the region into compliance with the NAAQS which it is failing to meet. In addition to developing this plan, known as a State Implementation Plan (SIP), the area must also implement transportation conformity requirements. Transportation conformity requires all regional transportation plans, programs, and projects to be analyzed to ensure conformity with the EPA’s Transportation Conformity Rule (40 CFR 93). The EPA must review and concur with this analysis before the Federal Highway Administration can approve it. Any changes to the regional Air Quality transportation plans, programs, and projects after a conformity approval is received, must be re-analyzed and approved before the change can occur. Transportation conformity is required for 20 years after an area is able to demonstrate compliance with the NAAQS. During this 20- year maintenance period, the maintenance area, as classified by the EPA, must maintain a SIP to ensure continued compliance with the NAAQS. Hampton Roads is currently classified as an 8- hour ozone maintenance area. The Hampton Roads ozone maintenance area includes the counties of Gloucester, Isle of Wight, James City, and York, along with the cities of Chesapeake, Hampton, Newport News, Norfolk, Poquoson, Portsmouth, Suffolk, Virginia Beach, and Williamsburg. EPA is expected to revise the ozone standard sometime in the next few years. This is likely to result in the reclassification of Hampton Roads as a nonattainment area for ozone. The main contributors to air quality deficiencies are heavy industry and automobile traffic. Although Gloucester lacks heavy industry that contributes to air pollution,
  • 15. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 15 surrounding areas do contain industries and high levels of traffic that impact local air quality. Current limits on open burning and potential alternative transportation plans that reduce traffic congestion will produce positive effects on local air quality, although these measures will not prevent regional nonattainment designation. Plants and Animals The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage (DCR- DNH), and the Department of Game and Inland Fisheries' Fish and Wildlife Information System maintain inventories of wildlife resources and habitats for Gloucester County. The Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information Service Website currently lists 446 different species found in Gloucester County. These include quail, dove, rabbit, wild turkey, hawks and owls, songbirds, turtles and amphibians, raccoon, beaver, opossum, muskrat, skunk, squirrel, woodchuck and white-tailed deer. Bald Eagles have nest sites established in the County. Tidal marshlands attract Sora Rail and Clapper Rail, and numerous varieties of wild ducks and other waterfowl. Freshwater fish include large and small-mouth bass and bream. Saltwater fish include shad, croaker, spot, bluefish, channel and black sea bass, menhaden, mackerel, eel, white and silver perch, and a variety of other saltwater species. Natural Heritage Resources The Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation’s Division of Natural Heritage defines natural heritage resources as the habitat of rare, threatened, or endangered plant and animal species, unique or exemplary natural communities, and significant geologic formations such as caves and karst features. Twenty-eight species and communities in Gloucester County have been designated by DCR as natural heritage resources (Table NENR- X3). DCR identifies and protects natural heritage resources statewide and maintains a comprehensive database of all documented occurrences of natural heritage resources in Virginia. DCR has developed conservation sites that contain known populations of natural heritage resources and include adjacent or surrounding habitat vital for their protection. Conservation sites do not represent protected lands; rather, they are recommended for protection and stewardship because of the natural heritage resources and habitat they support, but are not currently under any official protection designation. Conservation sites are areas that contain one or more rare plant, animal, or natural community and are designed to include the element, its associated habitat (where possible), and a buffer or other adjacent land thought necessary for the element’s conservation. Conservation sites can be used to screen development projects for potential impacts to natural heritage resources, aid local and regional planning, identify targets for acquisitions and easements and guide priorities for restoration activities. A prominent example of a conservation site in Gloucester County is the Dragon Run Conservation Site, which contains multiple rare species and habitat types. The Dragon Run supports an abundance of fish, wildlife, and plants, including ancient cypress trees. There are six natural heritage resources associated with the Dragon Run Conservation Site: the Bald Eagles, the Red Turtlehead, Bald Cypress Mixed Tupelo Intermediate Swamp, Northern Coastal Plain Tidal Bald Cypress Woodland, Tidal
  • 16. 16 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 Oligohaline Marsh (Narrow-leaved Cattail – Eastern Rose – Mallow Type), and Tidal Freshwater Marsh (Wild Rice – Mixed Forbs type). The Dragon Run’s natural ecosystem has survived primarily because the area is largely undeveloped – about 80 percent of the area is forested and the rest is primarily agricultural. Conservation sites are given a biodiversity significance ranking based on rarity, quality, and the number of element occurrences they contain; rankings are based on a scale of one to five, with one being the most significant. The Dragon Run Conservation Site has been given a biodiversity ranking of B2, which represents a site of very high significance. In addition to the Dragon Run Conservation Site, there are twenty-four (24) other conservation sites in Gloucester County (Table NENR-X 4 and Map NENR-X8). The Dragon Run watershed is one of the most important, largely undisturbed natural areas remaining in Gloucester County. Located along Gloucester’s northern boundary, this still pristine spring-fed waterway has been the subject of intensive study by local, regional, and state agencies. The Dragon Run Special Area Management Plan, produced by a partnership between the Dragon Run Steering Committee, the Middle Peninsula Planning District Commission, and the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program, part of the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), was completed in November 2003. The plan represents a common vision developed by multiple stakeholders and contains an action plan and benchmarks to measure progress in the effort to conserve the resources of the Dragon Run watershed. Gloucester County adopted the Dragon Run Watershed Management Plan as an addendum to the Comprehensive Plan in November 2004. The Dragon Run and its surrounding landscape owe their extraordinary state of preservation to the landowners in the area that have pursued compatible land uses such as farming and forestry. Recent scientific studies have also highlighted the watershed’s critical ecological importance to the region and its ecological value, including the purity of its water, the wealth of rare and unusual natural species it harbors, and the rural character of this pristine watershed. The rural way of life and traditional landscape in the Dragon Run Watershed are both valued by the residents of the area and considered worthy of conservation. One of the objectives of the Watershed Management Plan is to “Achieve consistency across county boundaries among land use plans and regulations in order to maintain farming and forestry and to preserve natural heritage areas by protecting plants, animals, natural communities, and aquatic systems.” As a result, the future land use plan identifies the watershed as the Dragon Run Conservation District and provides recommendations for this area to continue to remain largely rural, with low intensity uses, so as to sustain its key natural areas, water quality and rural character.
  • 17. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 17 Table NENR-X3: Natural Heritage Resources GROUP NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LAST YEAR OBSERVED GLOBAL RANK FWS SPECIES OF CONCERN STATE RANK FEDERAL STATUS STATE STATUS Terrestrial Natural Community Acer rubrum - Fraxinus pennsylvanica / Packera aurea - Carex bromoides - Pilea fontana - Bidens laevis Forest Coastal Plain Calcareous Seepage Swamp 2010 G2 SOC S2 Vertebrate Animal Ambystoma mabeei Mabee's Salamander 2010 G4 S1S2 LT Vertebrate Animal Ammodramus caudacutus Saltmarsh Sharp-tailed Sparrow 1992 G4 S2B, S3N Vascular Plant Cardamine pratensis Cuckooflower 2010 G5 S1 Vascular Plant Carex reniformis Reniform Sedge 1964 G4? SH Vascular Plant Chelone obliqua Red Turtlehead 1999 G4 S1 Vertebrate Animal Circus cyaneus Northern Harrier 1992 G5 S1S2B, S3N Vascular Plant Cuscuta cephalanthi Button-bush Dodder 1970 G5 S1? Vascular Plant Cuscuta indecora Pretty Dodder 1997 G5 S2? Vascular Plant Eleocharis tricostata Three-angle Spikerush 1938 G4 S1 Vascular Plant Eriocaulon parkeri Parker's Pipewort 1986 G3 S2
  • 18. 18 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 GROUP NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LAST YEAR OBSERVED GLOBAL RANK FWS SPECIES OF CONCERN STATE RANK FEDERAL STATUS STATE STATUS Terrestrial Natural Community Fagus grandifolia - Acer barbatum - Quercus muhlenbergii / Sanguinaria canadensis Forest Coastal Plain Calcareous Ravine Forest 2005 G2? SOC S2 Terrestrial Natural Community Fagus grandifolia - Quercus (alba, rubra) - Liriodendron tulipifera / (Ilex opaca var. opaca) / Polystichum acrostichoides Forest Northern Coastal Plain / Piedmont Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest 2010 G5 S5 Terrestrial Natural Community Fagus grandifolia - Quercus (alba, velutina, montana) / Kalmia latifolia Forest Northern Coastal Plain / Piedmont Oak - Beech / Heath Forest 2010 G4 S3 Vertebrate Animal Falco peregrinus Peregrine Falcon 1994 G4 S1B, S2N LT Vertebrate Animal Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle 2002 G5 S2S3B, S3N LT Vascular Plant Isotria medeoloides Small Whorled Pogonia 1997 G2 S2 LT LE Aquatic Natural Community NC-Great Wicomico- Piankatank First Order Stream NC-Great Wicomico- Piankatank First Order Stream 2011 G3 S3 Aquatic Natural Community NC-Great Wicomico- Piankatank Fourth Order Stream NC-Great Wicomico- Piankatank Fourth Order Stream 2011 G1G2 SOC S1S2 Aquatic Natural Community NC-Great Wicomico- Piankatank Second Order Stream NC-Great Wicomico- Piankatank Second Order Stream 2011 G3 S3
  • 19. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 19 GROUP NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LAST YEAR OBSERVED GLOBAL RANK FWS SPECIES OF CONCERN STATE RANK FEDERAL STATUS STATE STATUS Vertebrate Animal Nyctanassa violacea Yellow-crowned Night- heron 1976 G5 S2S3B, S3N Vascular Plant Sabatia campanulata Slender Marsh Pink 1965 G5 S2 Vascular Plant Schoenoplectus fluviatilis River Bulrush 1995 G5 S2 Terrestrial Natural Community Taxodium distichum - Nyssa (biflora, aquatica) / Itea virginica / Saururus cernuus Forest Bald Cypress - Mixed Tupelo Intermediate Swamp 2000 G3G4 S3S4 Terrestrial Natural Community Taxodium distichum - Nyssa biflora - Fraxinus profunda / Peltandra virginica - (Bignonia capreolata) Tidal Forest Northern Coastal Plain Tidal Bald Cypress Woodland 2000 G3 S2 Vascular Plant Trillium pusillum var. virginianum Virginia Least Trillium 1984 G3T2 SOC S2 Terrestrial Natural Community Typha angustifolia - Hibiscus moscheutos Tidal Herbaceous Vegetation Tidal Oligohaline Marsh (Narrow-Leaved Cattail - Eastern Rose-Mallow Type) 1999 G4G5 S3? Terrestrial Natural Community Zizania aquatica - Pontederia cordata - Peltandra virginica - Polygonum punctatum Tidal Herbaceous Vegetation Tidal Freshwater Marsh (Wild Rice - Mixed Forbs Type) 2000 G4? S4?
  • 20. 20 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 TERM DEFINITION S1 Critically imperiled in the state because of extreme rarity or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extirpation from the state. Typically 5 or fewer populations or occurrences, or very few remaining individuals (<1000). S2 Imperiled in the state because of rarity or because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extirpation from the state. Typically 6 to 20 populations or occurrences or few remaining individuals (1,000 to 3,000). S3 Vulnerable in the state either because rare and uncommon, or found only in a restricted range (even if abundant at some locations), or because of other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation. Typically having 21 to 100 populations or occurrences (1,000 to 3,000 individuals). S4 Apparently secure; Uncommon but not rare, and usually widespread in the state. Possible cause of long-term concern. Usually having >100 populations or occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S5 Secure; Common, widespread and abundant in the state. Essentially ineradicable under present conditions, typically having considerably more than 100 populations or occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S#B Breeding status of an animal within the state. S#N Non-breeding status of animal within the state. Usually applied to winter resident species. S#? Inexact or uncertain numeric rank. SH Possibly extirpated (Historical). Historically known from the state, but not verified for an extended period, usually > 15 years; this rank is used primarily when inventory has been attempted recently. S#S# Range rank; A numeric range rank, (e.g. S2S3) is used to indicate the range of uncertainty about the exact status of the element. Ranges cannot skip more than one rank. LE Listed Endangered LT Listed Threatened SOC Species of Concern species that merit special concern (not a regulatory category) Federal designations are developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State designations are developed by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage.
  • 21. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 21 Table NENR-X4: Natural Heritage Conservation Sites SITE NAME BIODIVERSITY RANK LEGAL STATUS Bar Neck B5 SL Beaverdam Creek Slopes B2 NL Beech Swamp Uplands B5 SL Bena Woodlands B5 SL Carvers Creek at Route 198 (SCU) B4 NL Carvers Creek B5 SL Catlett Islands B5 SL Church Hill Pond B4 SL Coleman Bridge B5 SL Dragon Run B2 SL Dragon Run (SCU) B2 NL Ferry Creek Ravine B2 NL Ferry Creek Upstream Route 198 (SCU) B4 NL Four Point Marsh B5 NL Harper Creek B5 SL Heywood Creek B5 SL Leigh Creek B5 SL Maryus – Guinea Marshes B5 SL Piankatank B5 SL Robins Pond Headwaters B3 FL Rosewell B2 SL Shepherdsville Church B5 SL Signpine B5 SL White Marsh Pond B5 SL Woods Mill Swamp B5 SL Source: Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage TERM DEFINITION SCU Stream Conservation Unit B1 Outstanding Significance B2 Very High Significance B3 High Significance B4 Moderate Significance B5 General Interest FL Federally listed species present SL State listed species present NL No listed species present
  • 22. 22 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 Important Bird Areas The Important Bird Areas (IBA) program is a global conservation effort coordinated by the National Audubon Society. IBAs are sites that provide essential habitat for one or more species of birds. IBAs may be a few acres or thousands of acres, but they are usually discrete sites that stand out from the surrounding landscape. IBAs may include public or private lands, or both, and they may be protected or unprotected. The Virginia IBA Program is a grassroots effort representing all regions of the state. The program identifies areas that are most important for nesting, mating, feeding, and wintering birds and, once identified, works to protect these areas through partnerships with local and state agencies and other groups. IBAs in Gloucester County are shown on Map NENR-79. These areas can be considered for protection or conservation status as part of the County’s future land use plan. Forest and Farmland Vegetation serves important functions in maintaining the land and supporting development by stabilizing the soil, preventing erosion, increasing soil permeability, and decreasing stormwater runoff. Vegetation also serves as a buffer for adjacent land uses, lessens the impact of noise, wind and heat, improves air quality, and provides habitat for wildlife. Although much of the land in the southeast portion of Gloucester County (which is the most suitable for growing loblolly and Virginia pine) has been lost to residential development, there are still large undeveloped portions of the County devoted to forestry uses. Good to fair soils occur throughout most of the northern and western portions of the County where the majority of forested acres include loblolly and Virginia pine. Other species grown and harvested as sawtimber commonly include yellow poplar, red oak, white oak, sweet and black gum, sycamore, ash, and some red maple. About 800 to 1,000 acres are planted by the Virginia Department of Forestry each year in Gloucester County. Almost all reforestation involves loblolly pine seedlings planted at 450 to 500 trees per acre. Even with reforestation at this level, it is doubtful that the present production of forest products in Gloucester can be maintained in the future due to the large scale conversion of forest land to other uses. The latest available forest surveys indicated that total forested acres in the County included approximately 89,000 acres of privately owned forest land and 500 acres of public land (U.S. Forest Service, 2007). The 2007 Census of Agriculture, published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, indicated that there were 159 active farms in Gloucester. Land in farms totaled 22,957 acres with an average farm size of 144 acres. Most of the farms, approximately 70%, were devoted to cropland. Soybeans, corn, and wheat were commonly produced crops. The 2007 Census also reported that Gloucester County had 3,738 acres of farmland being used as woodland, down 741 acres from 2002. Many more acres are currently being utilized by the forest industry or fall under private ownership. Figures are continually changing due to trends in absentee ownership and corporate land holdings. One of the County’s future land use goals is to preserve the rural character of the community. This can be achieved in a variety of ways; however the preservation of an active agricultural economy contributes to rural character while also providing economic benefits. In order to preserve viable agriculture and forestry in the midst of a growing
  • 23. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 23 residential population, more active support of agriculture and forestry may be needed. This can be done through practical land use policies and local regulations that support profitability of these industries while also recognizing and accommodating for the changing nature of agriculture. Critical Areas The regulations of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act (CBPA) require that local comprehensive plans address existing natural limitations of the land that can act as physical constraints to development. These may include: flood prone areas, highly erodible soils, highly permeable soils, wetlands, steep slopes, hydric soils, seasonally high water tables, groundwater recharge areas, significant wildlife habitat areas, prime agricultural lands, and protected lands. An assessment of soils for septic tank suitability is also required, although engineered septic systems now allow for development where soils are unsuitable for traditional septic systems. Gloucester County adopted a CBPA ordinance as the cornerstone of its response to state and interstate efforts to help protect and restore the Bay. As part of the ordinance, Gloucester designated CBPA areas that apply to all property in the County. Sensitive areas such as tidal shores, wetlands, and highly erodible soils are designated as Resource Protection Areas (RPAs) and include minimum 100-foot wide riparian buffers landward of these environmentally sensitive areas. All other lands in the County are classified as Resource Management Areas (RMAs), and are intended to protect the integrity of the RPAs. As a result, the County’s CBPA Ordinance acts as an overlay district for the entire County regardless of the zoning district. Gloucester County’s Site Plan Handbook summarizes the County’s Chesapeake Bay regulations in checklist form and includes stormwater calculation worksheets that can be used by developers to achieve compliance with pollutant removal requirements. Shorelines Shoreline conditions are described along primary and secondary shorelines, and characteristics are described for all contiguous navigable tidal waterways. The report covers 492.46 miles of the total 506.6 miles of shoreline, with approximately 98 miles coded remotely.9 The shoreline of Gloucester County is made up primarily of various types of marsh. The only segments of the Gloucester shore not considered low shore are along the York River from the Poropotank River to Sarah Creek. In this area, much of the land is classified as moderately low shore with bluffs ranging in height from 20 to 40 feet. The rest of the shore zone is composed of beaches. According to the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS), three beaches – near Fox Creek, around Gloucester Point, and on lower Jenkins Neck around Sandy Point – have the potential for medium- to high-intensity recreational uses (2008). Natural and Altered Shoreline Features The Gloucester County, Virginia Shoreline Inventory Report produced by VIMS indicates 9 The Gloucester County Shoreline Inventory Report includes thirty-four map plates and a summary table describing shoreline conditions. They are available online through the VIMS Center for Coastal Resources Management website at http://ccrm.vims.edu/gis_data_maps/shoreline_i nventories/index.html.
  • 24. 24 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 that the natural shoreline consists primarily of marsh, accounting for approximately 90% of the total shoreline. There are also areas of beach, the most significant of which are located near Fox Creek, around Gloucester Point, and on lower Jenkins Neck around Sandy Point. Areas of forested shoreline are also noted throughout the County. Map NENR-8 10 shows manmade shoreline protection features identified as part of the shoreline inventory. Bulkheads and riprap revetments protect about 28 miles of shoreline in the County. Map NR-11 shows shoreline recreational structures, such as marinas, boathouses, docks, and boat ramps. The highest concentrations of altered shoreline features are found around Gloucester Point and Sarah Creek. Adjacent Land Uses Gloucester’s Shoreline Inventory Report shows that the majority of the shoreline in the County is either forested (44%) or scrub-shrub (29%). Residential land uses account for the largest remaining portion of shoreline (20%), with the rest divided among grass, agriculture, commercial uses, paved, and timbered areas (VIMS, 2008). Impacts of Land Development Land uses adjacent to the shoreline, both existing and proposed, are required by the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act to be considered in comprehensive planning studies. This allows for the identification and analysis of land and water use conflicts and water quality issues. Activities on land and water regularly impact the utilization and quality of water resources. Potential impacts include increased nutrients, sediment, and pesticides carried in runoff and increased flows, which can cause stream bank erosion. In developing areas such as Gloucester County, local governments have the opportunity to direct conflicting land and water uses away from sensitive natural resources through the comprehensive planning process. Redevelopment efforts in waterfront areas within Gloucester County may also utilize higher densities and other techniques in conjunction with preservation of open space to help reduce impacts to the Chesapeake Bay. Redevelopment Runoff from developed areas carried from impervious surfaces can potentially degrade local water quality. Paved areas cannot absorb rainwater and the resultant runoff can transport nutrients, pollutants, and toxic substances into local waterways. Some of the older areas of the County were developed prior to the enactment of environmental regulations that require water quality protection measures in their design. In this situation, redevelopment provides the primary means of making significant water quality improvements. During redevelopment of these older areas, water quality improvement measures such as stormwater best management practices (BMPs) and shoreline restoration activities can be incorporated. Redevelopment activities must also comply with impervious area limitations, preserve existing vegetation, and may require connection to existing sewer service. Several of these existing developed sites are working waterfronts and considered to be cultural resources in Gloucester. Redevelopment of these sites should be consistent with their current use. Potential Shoreline Development Sites In Gloucester, most of the seafood processing plants and marinas where boats are moored have existed for decades and may be
  • 25. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 25 candidates for redevelopment. Redevelopment of older sites will also provide the opportunity for implementation of greater water quality protection measures. Some of the areas between Gloucester Point and Achilles, such as along Guinea Road (Route 216), Terrapin Cove Road, Tidemill Road, and Yacht Club Road are served by a Hampton Roads Sanitation District sewer force main, and the opportunity exists for marinas to connect for disposal of sanitary sewer wastes. Flood Prone Areas Flood prone areas are those sites in the County that are predictably subject to overflows from nearby water bodies. Development in flood prone areas is potentially both costly and hazardous. Several factors can determine the amount of damage caused by flooding, such as rate of water rise, depth and duration of flooding, geographic orientation of the shoreline, topography of the land, and the amount of threatened development. Development in flood prone areas can worsen flooding by increasing the amount of impervious cover, which prevents the natural infiltration and absorption of water into the soil. Preserving floodplains can have many benefits, including enhancing water quality, allowing recharge of groundwater aquifers, reducing flooding, providing fisheries and wildlife habitat, providing recreational opportunities, and protecting historic lands.10 Many flood prone areas in the County were developed before they were identified as part of a Special Flood Hazard Area and before the creation of federal and state floodplain protection programs. This historical development limits the opportunity to realize 10 DCR-CBLA, 1989 the full benefits of floodplain preservation. The County’s floodplain management efforts will continue to focus on the identification, reduction, and mitigation of flood hazards within developed areas. There may also be some opportunities for targeted restoration of floodplains through buy-out and relocation programs. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) identifies flood prone areas in Gloucester County on a series of Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), which were most recently revised by FEMA in September 2010. As part of the revision FEMA also provided the County the FIRM in digital format, which has been incorporated into the County’s online Geographic Information System (GIS). Elevations range from 0-160 feet above mean sea level, and approximately 27,000 acres of the County are within the 100-year flood plain. All new structures within these areas are required to be built with their finished floors above the 100-year flood levels indicated on the maps. Map NENR-9 12 illustrates the flood prone areas as indicated on the FIRMs. According to FEMA, Zone AE is the flood insurance rate zone that corresponds to the 1-percent annual chance floodplains. In most instances, Base Flood Elevations are determined within this zone and mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply. Zone VE is the flood insurance rate zone that corresponds to areas within the 1-percent annual chance coastal floodplain that have additional hazards associated with storm waves. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements also apply here. Zone A indicates areas with a 1% annual chance of flooding and a 26% chance of flooding over the life of a 30-year mortgage. Because detailed analyses are not performed
  • 26. 26 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 for such areas; no depths or base flood elevations are shown within these zones (Source: FEMA). Areas shown as X-500 have a moderate flood hazard, usually between the limits of the 100-year and 500-year floods. All other areas have a minimal flood risk. Gloucester County is a FEMA Community Rating System (CRS) member. Being a CRS member means that the County is audited annually by the Insurance Services Office (ISO) on how well the floodplain regulations in the community are administered and enforced. The CRS program is designed to recognize and encourage community floodplain management activities that exceed the minimum National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) standards. In 2010, Gloucester County earned “Class 7” status in the CRS program. As a result, Gloucester landowners who have flood insurance receive a fifteen (15) percent discount on their annual premiums. Gloucester County has addressed the potential hazards of development in flood prone areas through the adoption and revision of a Floodplain Management Ordinance, through inclusion of floodplain protections in its Subdivision Ordinance, and through development of a Floodplain Management Plan (FMP). The Floodplain Ordinance establishes performance requirements for development and redevelopment in floodplains. The ordinance was revised on August 3, 2010 to provide for increased flood protection standards of structures in the Flood Prone areas of the County. The Subdivision Ordinance directs that land subject to flooding be set aside for uses that would not be endangered by a periodic or occasional inundation. Lastly, County staff finalized a standalone floodplain management plan for the County that analyzes the causes of coastal flooding and identifies vulnerabilities, evaluates existing coastal flood management practices, and provides feasible solutions to strengthen the County’s overall coastal flood management system. Hazard mitigation strategies for Gloucester County are also addressed, and recommendations for improving existing strategies are provided. The plan incorporated input gained from citizens during three public meetings and communications with local, regional, state, and federal agencies and organizations. A sixteen (16) member planning committee made up of County staff and citizens from flood prone areas in Gloucester is charged with monitoring implementation, reviewing progress, and recommending revision to the plan in an annual report. The plan must be updated at least once every five years per the requirements of the CRS program. Dam Break Inundation Zones Localities are required to study dam break inundation zones and the potential impacts to downstream properties and incorporate that information into comprehensive plans. In general, dams are regulated if they exceed a certain height and capacity; exemptions are also made for specific uses. The hazard potential of a dam (low, significant, or high) is calculated based on its structural integrity and the various land uses that lie within its dam break inundation zone. The Middle Peninsula Planning District Commission covered dams and the potential for dam failures as part of its Middle Peninsula Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan, completed in 2010. According to the Virginia Department of Emergency Management, there is one high hazard dam (Beaver Dam, with a maximum storage capacity of 20,523 acre-feet) in Gloucester County and one significant hazard
  • 27. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 27 dam (Cow Creek Dam, with a maximum storage capacity of 931 acre-feet). There are nine additional dams that are not rated for their hazard potential by DCR. Dam break inundation zones for the two regulated dams in Gloucester County are shown on Map NENR-1013. Tidal and Non-Tidal Wetlands Wetlands are defined in Chapter 13 of Title 28.2 of the Code of Virginia and are classified as non- vegetated or vegetated wetlands. Non- vegetated wetlands means non-vegetated lands lying contiguous to mean low water and between mean low water and mean high water, including non-vegetated areas subject to flooding by normal and wind tides, but not hurricane or tropical storm tides. Vegetated wetlands are defined as lands lying between and contiguous to mean low water and an elevation above mean low water equal to the factor one and one-half times the mean tide range with certain types of vegetation present. They consist of mostly visible marshes and swamps. The type and extent of wetlands in Gloucester County are shown on Map NENR- 1014. Estuarine wetlands are tidal wetlands. Lacustrine wetlands are wetlands formed around interior bodies of water or dammed rivers. Palustrine wetlands are non-tidal wetlands. Riverine wetlands are those wetlands found along rivers before they reach lakes or salinity levels rise near oceans. According to the Virginia Wetlands Management Handbook (1996), there are five major benefits of wetlands. First, wetlands are important sites of food and energy production for the marine ecosystem. Second, they provide important waterfowl and fish and wildlife habitat. Third, wetlands provide natural protection from shoreline erosion. Fourth, wetlands help to filter pollutants, such as sediment and nutrients, from urban runoff, minimizing impacts to local water quality. Finally, wetlands help to reduce flooding through their capacity to absorb large amounts of water. In 2008, the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) published a shoreline situation report for Gloucester County that describes its tidal wetlands. Of the more than 492 miles of shoreline studied, 90% percent is comprised of wetlands, including fringe, embayed, and extensive marshes. The total marsh and wetland acreage of Gloucester County ranks fifth among political jurisdictions in the Commonwealth, behind only the counties of Accomack and Northampton and the cities of Chesapeake and Virginia Beach. Gloucester County's more than 12,000 acres of wetlands are comprised of high and low marshes, creeks, ponds, wooded areas, and tidal flats. At least 5,000 of these acres are marsh, 3,500 acres are in creeks, 1,800 acres are comprised of tidal flats, and nearly 600 acres are swamp land less than five feet above sea level. Hammocks are areas elevated above the surrounding marsh and usually dominated by pines, cedars, and wax myrtle. They comprise about 1,000 acres of the County's wetlands and account for about 40 percent of the state's total hammock-type physiography, more than in any other County. Existing Wetlands Protection Policies Gloucester County currently protects wetlands through its Wetlands Zoning Ordinance. Under the Ordinance, any proposal to develop any vegetated or non-vegetated tidal wetland must first apply for a permit from the local wetlands board or the Virginia Marine Resources Commission (VMRC). The Board works in conjunction with VMRC and the U.S. Army
  • 28. 28 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 Corps of Engineers’ Section 404 permit program in reviewing applications. In addition, tidal wetlands are protected as Resource Protection Area (RPA) features by the County’s Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance. This ordinance provides protection by requiring a buffer between development and the RPA feature. Non-tidal wetlands and other areas not included in the RPA are protected by designating them as Resource Management Areas. Some shoreline projects may include impacts under both the Wetlands Ordinance and the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance and may require coordinated reviews to address the requirements of both programs. Map NENR-11 15 depicts the approximate location of CBPA Resource Protection Areas in Gloucester County. In Virginia, tidal wetlands are also protected by the 1972 Wetlands Protection Act, as amended. The Act enabled the County to adopt its Wetlands Ordinance. This law established the joint permit process for construction, dredging, or filling in a tidal wetland and serves as the source of authority for actions taken on permits by the Gloucester County Wetlands Board. VMRC coordinates the joint permit with all appropriate agencies for review. VMRC also administers the Wetlands Protection Act and reviews all decisions handed down by the County board. Non-tidal wetlands are currently regulated at the federal level by Section 404 of the 1977 Clean Water Act, as amended, which prohibits disposal of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States and adjacent wetlands. A permit from the Army Corps of Engineers is required for non-tidal wetlands impacts. In addition, the Virginia Nontidal Wetlands Act of 2000 governs activities affecting non-tidal wetlands within the state and includes the following provisions. The law: • Requires permittees first to avoid, then minimize and, if wetlands must be destroyed, to replace their acreage and function. • Adopts the scientifically accepted definition of wetlands currently used by the federal government and the State Water Control Board. • Requires permits and mitigation from those proposing to drain, dredge, excavate, ditch, flood or impound, fill or discharge into non- tidal wetlands. • Requires the state to seek a Corps of Engineers' State Programmatic General Permit (SPGP) for most activities, thereby streamlining the permitting process. This SPGP has been issued. The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) issues state permits based on this general permit. • Exempts normal agricultural and silvicultural activities and homeowner landscaping and maintenance. • Requires general permits for a variety of activities, including sand, coal and gas mining activities, linear easements for public utilities and transportation projects, and activities affecting less than one-half acre. These general permits are issued by DEQ. Green Infrastructure As new residential and commercial development take place in Gloucester County it will be important to plan carefully for the protection of rural character and environmental resources that support a high quality of life for the County’s citizens. Green infrastructure is a systematic approach to conservation planning that can address a broad range of community needs. A green infrastructure approach can be used to identify a network of lands that is
  • 29. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 29 valuable for a variety of reasons including natural resource protection, water quality protection, recreation, and protection of working lands and cultural resources. Green infrastructure planning is also useful in differentiating between areas that are suitable for future development and those that are not. The Hampton Roads Planning District Commission (HRPDC) has completed a series of reports identifying important environmental areas in the region for inclusion in a regional green infrastructure network. This network extends from Gloucester County through the Peninsula to the Southside and Western Tidewater, and includes areas that provide water quality and wildlife habitat benefits. The most recent version of the Gloucester portion of the regional green infrastructure network is shown on Map NENR-1216. This network is documented in a series of reports11 that describe the methodologies used to identify the network. It also contains an inventory of resources such as parks and recreational areas. The regional network will be a starting point for the development of a more detailed network for the County. This county network can be used to connect the County’s rich natural resources with additional cultural and historic resources. It can also be used as a tool to plan for connections between important County assets. Even as the County grows and develops, existing rural and cultural landscapes and scenic views can be protected for residents and tourists visiting recreational and historic sites throughout the County. 11 HRPDC Green Infrastructure reports include A Green Infrastructure Plan for Hampton Roads (2010), Green Infrastructure in Hampton Roads (2007), and The Hampton Roads Conservation Corridor Study(2006). The HRPDC regional green infrastructure network identifies areas that are high value for water quality, habitat protection, and both. In Gloucester County, the 2010 green infrastructure plan identified approximately 900 acres that were high value for water quality, over 16,000 acres that were high value for habitat protection, and nearly 26,000 acres that were high value for both. This analysis can be used to prioritize areas for conservation, preservation, or outdoor recreational use. It can also be used to design a network of active and passive recreational areas that connect to environmental resources, as well as cultural and historic resources. Major Issues Soil Suitability for Septic Systems As discussed earlier, the majority of the soils in the southeastern part of Gloucester are classified as at least partially hydric, meaning that inundation occurs for periods of time that are sufficient to create anaerobic conditions. Hydric soils are also found along streams and rivers throughout the County. Although not all areas with hydric soils are classified as wetlands, these areas generally have a high water table and are susceptible to poor drainage and flooding. They are unsuitable for development or for conventional septic systems. Prior to environmental and land use regulation, residential and commercial development occurred in the southeastern half of the County where the soils are poorly suited for residential development. Wastewater disposal and protecting groundwater quality are soil-related problems that could be aggravated by unguided
  • 30. 30 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 future development. The Future Land Use Plan identifies those areas of the county that are unsuitable for septic system use or are otherwise unfit for intensive residential, commercial, or industrial development due to physical constraints. Shoreline Erosion and Erosion Rates Severely eroding shorelines are defined by the Virginia Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Manual as eroding at a rate greater than 3 feet per year. Although generally small in size, there are several areas of high bank erosion noted in Gloucester County. These include the Carmine and Mumfort Islands in the York River, isolated areas around Timberneck Creek, and much of Mill Creek. Areas with high marsh erosion rates are reported near Morris Bay, Monday Creek, and along the Ware River in the vicinity of Page Creek, Goat Point Creek, Four Point Marsh, and Mud Point. However, areas of high erosion account for only about 4% of the marshy shoreline in the County and the remainder appears to be generally stable. A recommended hierarchy of possible shoreline stabilization measures for low, moderate, and severely eroding shorelines is provided below. The following ranking, summarized in Table NR- 5, is consistent with the goals of the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act and may help to guide recommendations on applications for installing new stabilization structures or replacing existing structures. It is important to note that although erosion control options are ranked individually, often a combination of erosion control methods is necessary. The measures are listed by ranking, with #1 being the most preferable option. In 2011, the General Assembly adopted living shorelines as the preferred shoreline stabilization measure as opposed to shoreline hardening measures such as bulkheads. Where shoreline stabilization is necessary, a unified area approach, rather than an individual site-by-site approach, is recommended. When such an approach is taken, individual costs can be lessened and worsening erosion problems for neighboring properties can be avoided. For more information on erosion control options, refer to Section V - Shoreline Erosion Control and Access Policy Options of the HRPDC Regional Shoreline Element of Comprehensive Plans, Part I: Guidance Manual. An additional source of information on shoreline erosion control options that is useful for homeowners is Shoreline Management in Chesapeake Bay (Hardaway and Byrne, 1999). A series of in- house studies titled Shoreline Erosion Control Guidelines, by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation (1993), states that maintenance and establishment of marsh grasses should be considered as the first choice for shoreline erosion control in low energy areas with adequate site conditions.
  • 31. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 31 Table NENR-X5: Hierarchy of Possible Shoreline Stabilization Measures Ranking Stabilization Measure Areas with a Low Erosion Rate (<1 foot/year) 1 Vegetative stabilization with/without bank regrading (if applicable) 2 Revetments 3 Bulkheads Areas with a Moderate Erosion Rate (1-3 feet/year) 1 Vegetative stabilization (depending on site-specific conditions) 2 Beach nourishment 3 Revetments 4 Breakwaters 5 Groins 6 Bulkheads (depending on site-specific conditions) Areas with a Severe Erosion Rate (>3 feet/year) 1 Relocation 2 Beach nourishment 3 Revetments 4 Breakwaters 5 Groins 6 Seawall Generally speaking, for enhancing water quality and aquatic habitat, the Living Shorelines approach using vegetative and non-structural forms of erosion control is preferred over other forms of shoreline stabilization. However, non- structural forms of erosion control are not always effective at shoreline stabilization as wave energy increases and erosion becomes more severe. Along shorelines with less than 0.5 nautical miles of fetch, marsh planting may be a viable form of shoreline erosion control. Along interior creeks where erosion is more severe, marsh plantings may be protected by a breakwater type of structure, such as a submerged sill, to protect the marsh toe. This approach has been shown to be successful throughout the Chesapeake Bay. Gloucester County Code, §7.5-10, allows the County to designate erosion impact areas under the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. Additionally, approval of a conservation plan for any erosion impact area can be required and made subject to all review, bonding, inspection, and enforcement provisions that apply to approved land-disturbing permits. The plan must be submitted by the property owner. Currently, the County has not determined a need to designate any areas as erosion impact areas. It appears that most of the areas with erosion problems are areas that have already been developed. Where new development is considered, the County’s existing regulations
  • 32. 32 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 provide for protection of shorelines through avoidance (buffers) and mitigation. In areas where erosion affects already developed land, erosion control is the responsibility of the property owner. Stormwater Management Managing stormwater is an important local government function in Virginia. Gloucester County does not have a municipal stormwater system along the lines of those in cities such as Norfolk or Virginia Beach. Instead, it manages stormwater primarily through regulations such as the County’s Chesapeake Bay ordinance and its Erosion and Sediment Control ordinance, both of which are part of the County Code. This type of stormwater management program works best in mostly rural counties like Gloucester. However, parts of Gloucester such as Gloucester Point are growing. This may result in Gloucester being required to manage its stormwater through a dedicated treatment program. The United States Environmental Protection Agency is studying potential changes to federal stormwater regulations for coastal communities. This, along with the results of the 2010 U.S. Census, has the potential to redefine Gloucester as a more urban or highly populated locality, which would require additional investment in stormwater infrastructure. The Chesapeake Bay TMDL and recently-adopted Virginia state stormwater regulations could also result in changes to how the County will have to manage its stormwater system. Coastal Resources Management Coastal ecosystems reside at the interface between the land and water and are naturally very complex. They perform a vast array of functions, including shoreline stabilization, water quality protection, flood protection, and fish, wildlife, and plant habitat, all of which provide direct and indirect benefits to coastal communities like Gloucester County. Research on coastal ecosystem resource management has revealed that traditional resource management practices limit the ability of the coastal ecosystem to perform many of these essential functions. The loss of these services has already been noted throughout coastal communities in Virginia as a result of development in coastal areas coupled with common erosion control practices. For example, beaches and dunes are diminishing due to a reduction in a natural sediment supply. Also, wetlands are drowning in place due to the combination of sea level rise and barriers to inland migration resulting from the construction of bulkheads and revetments. Continued armoring of shorelines and development in coastal areas threatens the long-term sustainability of coastal ecosystems adapting to sea level rise. In response, the General Assembly has designated “living shorelines” as the preferred alternative for shoreline stabilization in Virginia’s coastal areas. The term living shoreline encompasses a full spectrum of design options appropriate for various wave energy settings and erosion problems; they range from marsh plantings to the use of rock sills in combination with beach nourishment. These approaches combat shoreline erosion, minimize impacts to the natural coastal ecosystem, and reinforce the principal that an integrated approach for managing tidal shorelines enhances the probability that the resources will be sustained. Therefore, local governments should adopt the guidance and practices recommended by VIMS to ensure that functions performed by coastal ecosystems will
  • 33. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 33 be preserved and the benefits derived by humans from coastal ecosystems will be maintained into the future. The guidance developed by VIMS recommends: - utilizing VIMS Decision Trees to review and select appropriate erosion control and shoreline management practices12 - adopting these shoreline best management practices as the recommended approach and requiring justification by applicants seeking to use another approach - training local staff on these decision-making tools - making local policies consistent with the general permit being developed by VMRC - educating citizens and stakeholders on the benefits of living shorelines - evaluating and considering a locality-wide permit to promote living shorelines - considering preserving available open spaces adjacent to marshlands to allow for inland retreat in response to sea level rise - evaluating and considering cost share opportunities for construction of living shorelines Sea Level Rise The Hampton Roads region is highly vulnerable to damages from storm surge and potential sea level rise. Much of the region is relatively flat and low-lying, which allows storms to push ashore and flood large areas. While related, vulnerability to these two hazards creates different sets of risk for Gloucester County. Storm surge vulnerability impacts the County now. A significant part of the County lying east of Route 17 lies in a Category 1, 2, 3, or 4 Storm Surge Area, as shown in Table NENR-36. The most vulnerable areas of the County are found 12 More information on the VIMS Decision Trees is available on the website for the Center for Coastal Resources Management at http://ccrm.vims.edu/decisiontree/index.html along Mobjack Bay and include Jenkins Neck, Maryus, Severn, Achilles, Bena, Perrin, Robins Neck, Glass, Dutton, Ware Neck, White Marsh and portions of Gloucester Point. This is illustrated on Map NR-1317. Table NENR-36: Area Vulnerable to Storm Surge in Gloucester County (Areas are cumulative) STORM SURGE CATEGORY AREA (ACRES) 1 21,476 2 35,518 3 40,254 4 43,904 Source: Hampton Roads Planning District Commission Hurricanes and other storms can cause significant damage to buildings. Tidal and surge flooding is limited to coastal areas. In addition to impacts on structures, these storms can have significant impacts on the natural environment. Storms can erode beaches and blow down trees and other vegetation. Many of the most critical environmental areas in Hampton Roads are located in areas that could be affected by storm surge. For example, an analysis by the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission calculated the amount of green infrastructure in the region that is vulnerable to a Category 1 storm surge at approximately 84,000 acres, or 16.5% of the region’s entire green infrastructure network. Sea level rise could potentially result in the inundation or severe erosion of a significant part of eastern Gloucester County, as shown on Map NR-1417. Global sea level rise is the result of melting ice, which adds to the amount of water in the oceans, as well as the warming of the oceans, which results in their thermal expansion. At the local scale, sea level rise is a combination of global sea level rise, local and regional currents, and the vertical movement of
  • 34. 34 Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 land. Gloucester, like much of Hampton Roads and eastern Virginia, is sinking, or subsiding, due to several geological processes. The end result is that the entire region is experiencing significant local sea level rise. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the long-term trend of sea level rise at the Gloucester Point/Yorktown Tide Station is about 0.15 mminches/year, or approximately 1.25 feet every 100 years. However, climate change is projected to increase the rate of global sea level rise, which could result in much higher rates of sea level rise experienced in Gloucester and across Hampton Roads. Current projections of global sea level rise by the end of the 21st century range from about half a meter to two meters, according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.13 Surface Water Quality Point Source Pollution Point source pollution is a major source of surface water quality issues. Point sources of pollution include municipal and industrial dischargers and individual waste treatment systems. The Clean Water Act requires wastewater dischargers to have a permit establishing pollution limits and specifying monitoring and reporting requirements. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits regulate household and industrial wastes that are collected in sewers and treated at municipal wastewater treatment plants. Permits also regulate industrial point sources and concentrated animal feeding operations that discharge into other wastewater collection systems or that discharge directly into receiving waters. The types of 13 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Circular 1165-2-212, “Sea-Level Change Considerations for Civil Works Programs” pollutants regulated include conventional pollutants (human wastes, food from sink disposals, laundry and bath waters), toxic pollutants (organics and metals), and nonconventional pollutants, (such as nitrogen and phosphorus), that may require regulation. In Virginia, NPDES permits are administered by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and are identified as Virginia Pollution Discharge Elimination System (VPDES) Permits. According to data from DEQ, there are four current holders of VPDES permits in Gloucester County. Thirteen Hampton Roads localities, including Gloucester County, are currently under a Special Order by Consent with the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) concerning sanitary sewer overflows. The Hampton Roads Sanitation District (HRSD) has separately entered into a Consent Decree with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This consent order is the result of the U. S. EPA’s expanded enforcement priorities, which target sanitary sewer systems serving populations over 1 million. This Consent Order requires local and regional wastewater utilities to assess and test their conveyance systems for failures and capacity related issues, making necessary replacements and system enhancements. The affected Hampton Roads localities and HRSD are working together in this compliance effort, which will result in a Regional Wet Weather Management Plan that will guide prioritization and investment in larger scale projects. The Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) contains information about more than 650 toxic chemicals that are being used, manufactured, treated, transported or released into the environment. Hazardous waste information is
  • 35. Gloucester County Comprehensive Plan 2013 35 contained in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS), a national program management and inventory system about hazardous waste handlers. In general, all entities that generate, transport, treat, store, and dispose of hazardous wastes are required to provide information about their activities to state environmental agencies. According to the EPA, there were no TRI permit holders in Gloucester in 20102011, the latest year for which data is available. EPA’s Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information (RCRAInfo) database lists 46 48 RCRIS permit holders in Gloucester as of October 2011June 2013. Both RCRAInfo and VPDES permit holders are listed in Table NENR-67. The release of hazardous materials at designated hazardous material facilities on major transportation routes within the County poses potential threat to both surface water and groundwater resources. Gloucester County has established a Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC) to address this threat. In addition to the benefits to public safety, the LEPC works to reduce the threat of surface water and groundwater contamination through quick response to transportation accidents and release of hazardous materials. Non-Point Source Pollution Non-point sources, which have the most significant impact on surface water quality in Gloucester County, encompass all those inputs to surface water that cannot be identified as having originated from a distinct discharge point. These include stormwater runoff from agriculture, urban or forested land surfaces; atmospheric inputs; solid waste disposal; land application of sludge and wastewater; septic tanks; dredging; development/construction material spills and leaks; marinas, and shipyards, as well as impacts from the natural environment such as weathering of soils which provides metals, acids, etc. These types of pollution are not readily quantified, although a relationship does exist with the amount of precipitation. More precipitation produces more runoff and thus a greater non-point source impact. In Gloucester County, agricultural runoff, residential septic system discharges, stormwater runoff, or marina discharges are generally linked to the condemnation of shellfish grounds due to non- point source pollution. Many of the same sources affecting surface water quality impacts also have the potential to impact groundwater resources.